Lanfair Center For Rehab & Nsg Care INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 288 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 79.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with continued weight loss was provided with nutritional supplements as ordered. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 82. Findings include: During the annual survey completed 05/08/25, a deficiency was issued related to Resident #5's weight loss. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 on 06/10/25 revealed an admission date of 07/25/24 and diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, and acute kidney failure. Review of physician's orders revealed an order on 12/24/24 for a pureed diet, nectar thick liquids, and four ounces of Gelato (an ice cream type nutritional supplement containing 260 calories) with meals. Review of the plan of care started on 07/29/24 revealed Resident #5 was at nutritional risk. The goal was for no significant weight change. The interventions included Gelato at all meals (beginning 12/24/24). Observations on 06/10/25 at 11:58 A.M. revealed Resident #5's lunch tray was taken to his room. It…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review and review of The Center for Clinical Standards and Quality QSO-24-08-NH memo, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during wound care. This affected one resident (#61) of one resident observed for wound care. The facility census was 82. Findings included: During the annual survey completed 05/08/25, a deficiency was issued related to the facility's failure to implement EBP during wound care. Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 04/25/25 and diagnoses including fracture of right lower leg with orthopedic surgery and sepsis with surgical wound infection. Review of hospital records revealed the resident was admitted with severe sepsis secondary to a right ankle wound infection. The resident had surgery on the right ankle on 04/15/25 and 04/22/25. The surgical culture showed Enterococcus facialis. The resident then admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and store food in a safe manner. This affected all the residents residing in the facility, except Resident #69 who was nothing by mouth. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 05/05/25 at 9:30 A.M., revealed an undated jar of minced garlic that was more than half empty, three deli sandwiches, open and undated, and a package of deli meat, open and undated. Interview on 05/05/25 at 9:32 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #194, confirmed three undated items in the walk-in refrigerator. DM #194 dated minced garlic at the time of discovery and discarded the deli sandwiches and package of deli meat. Observation of the pantry on 05/05/25 at 9:35 A.M., revealed, an undated half of a bottle of orange concentrated syrup and a large undated open bag of crackers. Interview on 05/05/25 at 9:40 A.M. with DM #194, confirmed undated items in the pantry. DM #194 dated orange concentrated syrup at time of discovery. She also discarded the undated bag of crackers.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 had appropriate diagnosis for psychotropic's and failed to monitor Resident #51's behaviors. This affected one residents (#51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/16/23 with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, and hypertension. Review of Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #51's plan of care dated 03/17/23 revealed the resident received psychotropic medications including antidepressants, antianxiety medications, and antipsychotics related to her diagnosis of dementia with psychotic disturbance. Interventions included observing for side effects,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure the state was notified of a change in mental disease for Resident #28 and #51. This affected two residents (#28 and #51) of two residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening/Resident Review Identification Screen (PASARR). The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/01/17 with diagnoses including dementia, epilepsy, bipolar disorder, other psychotic disorder, and dysphagia. In 2022 diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder were added and on 01/14/23 a diagnosis of major depressive disorder was added. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the last PASSAR was submitted 08/16/18 and indicated she had a mood disorder and insomnia. Interview on 05/06/15 at 10:40 A.M. with Regional Director of Social Services and Activities #229 verified a PASSAR was not completed when Resident #28's diagnoses changed and should have been. 2. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/16/23 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for two residents (#5 and #184) in the area of swallowing strategies and c-pap use. This affected two residents (#5 and #184) of 23 sampled residents. The facility was 82. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an initial admission date of 07/25/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular disease, fungal endocarditis, choledocholithiasis, Alzheimer's disease, hypothyroidism, obstructive and reflux uropathy, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, seizures, chronic kidney disease, retention of urine, benign prostatic hyperplasia, abdominal aortic aneurysm, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and dementia. Review of the resident's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident's diet order on discharge was to resume his home diet. Review of the Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) results dated 07/22/24 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide daily wound care as ordered for Resident #182. This affected one (Resident #182) out of one resident reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #182's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of the pelvis, falls, pustular psoriasis, diabetes mellitus type 2, moderate protein malnutrition, HLD and low back pain. Review of Resident # 182's physicians orders dated 05/01/25, revealed an order for SilvaSorb gel; cleanse right dorsal foot with IHWC (in house wound cleanser), pat dry, apply thin layer SilvaSorb and cover with foam dressing daily and as needed, and an order dated 05/02/25, to cleanse left lower extremity with IHWC (in house wound cleanser), pat dry, apply thin layer SilvaSorb to open wound bed, cover with non-adherent and wrap with kerlix daily and prn. Review of Resident # 182's care plan dated 05/03/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 03/19/25, with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, abnormal weight loss, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of weight record for Resident #62 revealed on 03/17/2025, the resident weighed 215.6 lbs. On 04/14/2025, the resident weighed 190.8 lbs, which reflects an 11.50% loss. Review of care plan dated 03/20/25 revealed the resident is at risk for altered nutrition related to urinary tract infection, candidal sepsis, impaired skin integrity, diabetes, edema, obesity, and the need for a therapeutic diet. The resident's care approaches included offering menu alternatives as needed, honoring food preferences, monitoring weekly weights for four weeks then monthly if stable, and notifying the registered dietitian and physician if there is a significant weight change over five percent. Review of minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 03/26/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical record, and review of facility policy the facility failed to have physician orders in place for Resident #184's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) and failed to ensure oxygen orders were followed and oxygen administration was documented for Resident #33. This affected two residents (#33 and #184) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/15/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate protein- calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, and altered mental status. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was rarely or never understood. He received oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #33's physician order dated 09/24/23 revealed an order for continuous oxygen at two liters via a nasal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure the physician gave a clear reason why a pharmacy recommended gradual dose reduction (GDR) was not performed on residents with psychotropic's. This affected two residents (#28 and #51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/16/23 with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, and hypertension. Review of Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #51's pharmacy recommendation dated 09/19/24 revealed the pharmacist recommended trialing a decrease of Quetiapine (an antipsychotic) to 25 milligrams (mg) every other day for seven days due to no documented behaviors on MDS and a dementia diagnosis.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH