No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Altercare Of Wadsworth

147 Garfield St, Wadsworth, OH 44281 · For profit - Individual · 90 certified beds · (330) 335-2555 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 335-2555 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
119 Broad St · (330) 334-1534 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
120 High St · (330) 335-2595 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
153 Broad St · (234) 217-8117 · Call to confirm hours
Park
153 Pine St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.7%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%30.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.6%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.9%CMS range 31.3–52.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 7.6–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
53.1%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 66.1 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure food was served at palatable temperatures. This had the potential to affect 64 residents that received meals from the facility. The facility identified one resident (Resident's #9) that received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation of tray line on 07/23/25 from 4:40 P.M. through 5:34 P.M. revealed food was above 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on the tray line. Further observation revealed that the plate warmer was not turned on and the hot bottoms were on but Dietary Aide (DA) #255 did not use them for the entire line. The food truck left the kitchen at 5:23 P.M. and arrived at the unit within a minute. When the last tray on the cart was delivered on 07/22/25 at 5:36 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) #246 went to take the temperature of the food and stated that the temperature for the chicken tender was 108 degrees F, French fries were 104.9 degrees F, and the green beans were 106.9 degrees F. DM #246 stated that DA #255 forgot to put on the hot bottom for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received activities to meet her needs and preferences. This affected one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/20/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #4 dated 11/27/24 and revised 01/03/25 revealed Resident #4 needed encouragement to participate in activities and needed assistance to and from activities. Interventions included placing an activity calendar for each month in the resident's room, encouraging the resident to explore activity opportunities available and providing regularly scheduled dog therapy visits. Review of Resident #4's activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed music, pets, going outside to get fresh air, and doing things with groups of people was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with staff and Resident #70's wife, the facility failed to document and adequately address Resident #70's complaints of change in condition. This affected one (Resident #70) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 65. Findings include: A review of Resident #70's clinical record revealed and admission date of 03/17/23 with diagnoses including hydrocephalus with normal pressure, gastronomy with tube feeding, obstructive sleep apnea, spinal stenosis, chronic sinusitis, low blood pressure, and hypothyroidism.Resident #70's electronic clinical record contained the following documentation on 07/11/25 from 4:41 P.M. to 4:39 A.M. on 07/12/25: 4:41 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) checked for tube feed residual. 5:34 P.M. the DON administered medications to Resident #20 and blood pressure (92/52) was documented. The tube feeding rate was signed off and gastronomy placement was checked. Ensured the head of bed (HOB) was elevated. Administered enteral flush. 6:49 P.M. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) charted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination of germs during Resident #1's and Resident #3's medication administration and failed to remove the soiled wound treatment gauze from Resident #2's room after wound care and failed to ensure staff properly cleaned wound care equipment after use during Resident #2's wound treatment procedure. This affected two (Residents #1 and #3) out of three residents observed for medication administration and one (Resident #2) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 05/13/25 with diagnoses including [NAME] Syndrome (colonic pseudo-obstruction, is the acute dilatation of the colon in the absence of any mechanical obstruction in severely ill patients), chronic constipation, anemia, vascular implant, deep vein thrombosis, gastrointestinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4's wheelchair was maintained in a safe operational condition. This affected one (Resident #4) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 65. Findings include: A review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/24 with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, insomnia, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, heart disease, gastroenteritis/colitis, diarrhea, malnutrition, osteoarthritis, high blood pressure and cholesterol, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia and viral wart. Resident #4's occupational therapy notes dated 02/21/25 indicated Resident #4 was provided with a drop seat wheelchair. Resident #4 demonstrated good upright posture at all times utilizing bilateral leg rests. A review of the Concern Log dated 03/03/25 indicated Resident #4's daughter voiced a concern regarding Resident #4's wheelchair. Resident #4's daughter requested an update from therapy regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were dated and labeled after opening. This affected three residents (#9, #16, and #40) of four residents observed for insulin pens during medication administration. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical records revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes. Review of Resident #9's physician order for March 2025 revealed resident was ordered Glargine insulin (long-acting insulin) 25 units subcutaneous (SQ) twice a day (BID). Observation during medication administration on 03/13/25 at 8:22 A.M. of the insulin pens with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 154 revealed multiple insulin pens were not dated when opened with expiration date. Resident #9's Glargine insulin pen had no date to indicate when it was opened. Interview on 03/13/25 at 9:03 A.M. with LPN #154 confirmed Resident #9's insulin pen was not dated when opened. LPN #154 reported the insulin pen should be dated when opened and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures while administering medications. This affected two residents (#46 and #49) of four residents observed for infection control during medication administration. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnosis including but not limited to scoliosis, stage three chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had intact cognition. Review of physician orders for March 2025 revealed resident #49 was ordered, Gabapentin 100 milligram (MG) one capsule three times a day (TID) for pain, Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (ER) 50 mg one tablet once a day (QD) for blood pressure, and Pantoprazole 40 mg one tablet qd for acid reflux. Observation of medication administration on 03/13/25 at 7:27 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #122 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-25 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have the designated infection control preventionist participate in the quality assurance committee and attend meetings as required. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the certificate of completion of the infection preventionist training course revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #596 completed the course on 03/01/23. Review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee members revealed RN #596 was not listed as a member. Review of the QAPI monthly committee meetings for 12/15/23, 01/11/24, 02/23/24 and 03/22/24, revealed RN #596 had not attended the meetings. Interview on 04/22/24 at 9:12 A.M. with RN #596 revealed she was the interim infection preventionist for the facility and had been in that role since December 2023. She stated the Director of Nursing was in the process of completing the infection preventionist training. Follow up interview on 04/24/24 at 10:23 A.M. with RN #596 verified she was not on the document provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to invite one resident, Resident #60's, Power of Attorney (POA) to all care plan meetings. This affected one resident (#60) of one resident reviewed for care plan meetings. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/04/23. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent for activities of daily living. Interview on 04/23/24 at 9:39 A.M. with Resident #60's POA revealed she was only invited to two of Resident #60's care plan meetings. Resident #60's POA revealed she would prefer to attend all care conference meetings. Review of the Resident Care Conferences revealed Resident #60 was scheduled to have a quarterly care plan meeting on 05/05/24, 08/04/24, 12/06/24 and 03/10/24. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or responsible party was notified of changes in wound treatment and skin injury. This affected two (#26 and #60) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/04/23. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #60's face sheet revealed Resident #60 had a Power of Attorney (POA) for Health Care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for activities of daily living, and had no ulcers, wounds or skin problems. Review of the care plan for Resident #60 dated 05/04/23 revealed Resident #60 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and was at risk for skin breakdown. Interventions included to observe and report any noted redness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were ambulated per physician order to maintain function abilities. This affected one (Resident #65) of two residents reviewed for restorative programs. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 02/09/24 with diagnoses including Parkinsonism (having the same symptoms of Parkinson's Disease), muscle weakness and age-related physical debility. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #65 revealed he had intact cognition, had no behaviors or refusals of care and was able to understand staff and be understood. Review of the Restorative Program Initial Observation dated 03/25/24 authored by Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #505 revealed therapy had referred Resident #65 for a restorative ambulation program related to weakness. Review of the physician's order dated 03/25/24 revealed a restorative program, staff were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding application of Tubigrip (a tubular stocking that provides compression) and elevation of an extremity and failed to ensure incontinence briefs fit appropriately and did not cause skin injury. This affected one (#60) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living and one of four residents (#60) reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/04/23. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and aphasia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 05/04/23 revealed Resident #60 had potential for fluid imbalance/complications related to edema.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow orders and implement new orders for a resting hand splint for one resident (#60) of one resident reviewed for splints. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/04/23. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 05/04/23 revealed Resident #60 had potential for fluid imbalance/complications related to edema. Interventions included to evaluate edema. Review of the physician orders for Resident #60 revealed an order dated 05/23/23 for a resting hand splint to the right hand during hours of sleep four to six hours every shift. Observation on 04/23/24 at 9:22 A.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21's urinary catheter bag was placed below his bladder at all times. This affected one (#21) of four residents reviewed for bowel and bladder/incontinence care. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 12/27/23. Diagnosis included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the physician order with a start dated on 03/30/24 revealed suprapubic catheter to straight drain for neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the plan of care dated 01/09/24 revealed interventions included resident would not develop complications related to Foley (urinary) catheter such as urinary tract infection. Keep drainage bag below bladder and off of the floor. Observation of Resident #21 on 04/22/24 at 11:27 A.M. revealed his urinary catheter drainage bag was lying on the bed with clear yellow urine in the tubing and in the drainage bag. The urinary catheter drainage bag was not positioned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition per physician's order. This affected one (#60) of one resident reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/04/23. Diagnoses included esophagitis, gastroparesis, and dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for activities of daily living, and received tube feeding. Review of the care plan dated 05/05/23 for Resident #60 revealed Resident #60 was at risk for altered nutrition related to a diagnosis of recent stroke with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) tube placement (feeding tube). Resident #60 received nothing by mouth (NPO) and was dependent on tube feed for nutrition and hydration. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor oxygen saturation levels for residents receiving continuous and as needed oxygen. This affected three residents, Residents #26, #31 and #60 of six residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/04/23. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, esophagitis, lack of coordination, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease and emphysema. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for activities of daily living, and had medically complex conditions. Review of the care plan for Resident #60 dated 05/04/23 revealed Resident #60 had alteration in respiratory function related to emphysema and former smoker. Interventions included to administer oxygen as ordered. Review of the physician orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dialysis residents were monitored after dialysis treatments. The facility also failed to maintain communication with the dialysis center. This affected one ( #16) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/10/23 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease. Review of the physician's order dated 03/30/24 revealed Resident #16 received dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Review of Resident #16's dialysis assessments revealed he did not have post-dialysis assessments on 04/06/24, 04/09/24, 04/11/24, 04/18/24 and 04/20/24. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed there was no documentation received from the dialysis center for Resident #16 from 03/30/24 through 04/22/24. Interview on 04/23/24 at 2:44 P.M. with Dialysis Nurse #598 revealed the facility did not send communication with Resident #16 at times and never required any information to be sent back to the facility from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order for an as needed psychotropic medication had a time-frame for usage for Resident #13. This affected one resident (#13) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/20/23 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia with anxiety, major depressive disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of the Psychotropic Medication Regimen Evaluation, dated 03/04/24, revealed a gradual dose reduction (GDR) would be attempted for Ativan. Resident #13's new orders included Change routine Ativan to 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID) and add Ativan 0.5 mg as needed (PRN) with no stop date to monitor PRN usage and GDR attempt. Review of the physician's orders for April 2024 identified orders for Ativan 0.5 mg as needed ordered on 03/04/24 with no end date. On 04/24/24 at 11:19 A.M., interview with Registered Nurse (RN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record for residents. This affected two ( #26 and #40) of 26 residents reviewed. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 12/01/18 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #26 had an order dated 11/09/23 for Medihoney to his left buttock, cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Medihoney and cover with dry dressing twice a day. This order had a discontinue date of 01/16/24. Review of the wound provider's progress note dated 12/14/23 revealed Nurse Practitioner (NP) #597 had assessed Resident #26 for a left buttock abrasion. NP #597 documented the wound was intact and healed. NP #597 provided an order for staff to gently cleanse the wound, pat dry, apply Medihoney (treatment for the management of wounds and burns that help in the management of chronic and stalled wounds and to assist in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect 72 out of 73 residents in the facility. Resident #69 was identified as being nothing by mouth (NPO). Findings include: A tour of the kitchen on 06/25/23 from 8:06 A.M. through 8:25 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #833 revealed there was ice buildup in the walk-in freezer that had ice forming on the boxes of frozen supplements and a container of Canadian bacon. In the walk-in refrigerator there was cole slaw not labeled or dated. The ceiling was peeling in the dry storage room. In the kitchen area, there was paper, food residue, dishes, and a steam table lid was on the floor behind the cooking equipment, the dish dolly, where clean plate lids were stored, had dried food residue on it, and the microwave was dirty with food residue inside. Interview on 06/25/23 at 11:30 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #833 revealed that dietary had been short staffed lately and there were no sanitation policies for the kitchen. DM #833 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide/ensure, one resident, Resident #47, had his glasses available and a recliner chair per the fall/risk for fall, plan of care and Resident #57's call light was in reach. This affected two residents, Resident #47 and #57, of three residents reviewed for fall risk prevention. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 03/28/23. Diagnosis included need for assistants with personal care, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, type two diabetes mellitus, and repeated falls. Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact. Resident #47 required extensive assistants of two for bed mobility, toileting, extensive assistants of one for transfers, and limited assistants of two for ambulation. Resident #47's vision was impaired. Record review of the care plan dated 04/06/23 included Resident #47 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure advance directives were updated per resident preference. This affected two of 26 residents reviewed for advance directives. the facility census was 73. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission dated of [DATE]. Diagnosis Include delusional, altered mental status, suicidal ideations, and anxiety. Review of the hard chart for Resident #32 revealed no Do Not Resuscitate (DNA) paperwork in hard chart. Review of the initial Resident Care Conference dated [DATE], for Resident #32 revealed the resident wants to be a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC), per resident and family. Interview on [DATE] at 7:35 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #330 revealed if a resident codes the nurse would first look in the hard chart to see if there was a DNR paper, if there wasn't a DNR paper in the resident's hard chart then CPR would be started. Interview on [DATE] at 8:30 A.M. with Licensed Social Worker (LSW)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Residents #14 and #30 were free from verbal abuse including intimidation. This affected two residents (Residents # #14 and #30) of four residents (#14, #27, #30 and #61) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff for mobility and transfer. Further review of the MDS revealed no behaviors. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff for mobility, supervision with one staff for transfer and extensive assistance with one staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Further review of the MDS revealed no behaviors. Interview on 06/25/23 at 3:14 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed that she was upset because of a State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reassess one resident, Resident #13 for restraint reduction and failed to release restraints on Resident #13 every two hours and with meals while in use per the physician orders. This affected one resident, Resident #13 of two residents reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 04/03/19. Diagnosis included epilepsy not intractable, without status epilepticus, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, weakness, cerebral palsy, and abnormal posture. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #13 required extensive assistants of two assists for bed mobility, dressing, total dependence of two for transfers, and extensive assist of one for eating. Resident #13 had no functional limitation in range of motion to bilateral upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility's Self-Reported Incidents, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy regarding allegations of verbal abuse including intimidation. This affected two residents (Residents #14 and #30) of four residents (#14, #27, #39 and #61) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Interview on 06/25/23 at 3:14 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed that she was upset because of a State Tested Nurse (STNA) #857 being mean to her and another resident (Resident #14) and felt that nothing was being done because STNA #857 continued to be mean. Resident #30 stated that a week ago STNA #857 called her and another resident (Resident #14) liars while they were smoking outside. Review of the statement from Hospitality Aide (HA) #886 dated 06/20/23 revealed HA #886 took Resident #14 and Resident #30 outside to smoke. HA #886 stated that STNA #857 came outside where residents #14 and #30 were smoking and asked Resident #30, Why are you telling people that I'm being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse including intimidation was reported to the state agency as required This affected two residents (Residents #14 and #30) of four residents (#14, #27, #39 and #61) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Interview on 06/25/23 at 3:14 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed that she was upset because of a State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #857 being mean to her and another resident (Resident #14) and felt that nothing was being done because STNA #857 continued to be mean. Resident #30 stated that a week ago STNA #857 called her and another resident (Resident #14) liars while they were smoking outside. Review of the statement from Hospitality Aide (HA) #886 dated 06/20/23 revealed HA #886 took Resident #14 and Resident #30 outside to smoke. HA #886 stated that STNA #857 came outside where residents #14 and #30 were smoking and asked Resident #30, Why are you telling people that I'm being too rough with you and I'm not.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, and policy review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of alleged verbal abuse. This affected two residents Resident (#14 and #30) of four reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Interview on 06/25/23 at 3:14 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed that she was upset because of a State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #857 being mean to her and another resident (Resident #14) and felt that nothing was being done because STNA #857 continued to be mean. Resident #30 stated that a week ago STNA #857 called her and another resident (Resident #14) liars while they were smoking outside. Review of the statement from Hospitality Aide (HA) #886 dated 06/20/23 revealed HA #886 took Resident #14 and Resident #30 outside to smoke. HA #886 stated that STNA #857 came outside where residents #14 and #30 were smoking and asked Resident #30, Why are you telling people that I'm being too rough with you and I'm not. Resident #30 replied to STNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all residents received showers per the shower schedule. This affected three of four residents reviewed for showers (Resident #10, #16 and#19.) The facility census was 73. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date on 10/08/19. Diagnosis included anxiety, heart failure, depression and Excoriation Disorder (picking skin disorder). Review of annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 stated it is very important to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. Review of the shower schedule for the 300 unit revealed showers were to be given twice a week on Wednesday and Saturday for Resident #19. Review of the shower sheets revealed on 05/27/23, 06/07/23, 06/10/23, 06/17/23, 06/21/23 and 06/24/23, the showers were not given. Interview on 06/26/23 at 2:45 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #855 verified on 05/24 through 05/31 Resident #19 did not receive a shower or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dressing to one resident, Resident #18's, dialysis port was secured to prevent exposure and potential infection to the insertion site. This affected one resident, Resident #18, of one resident reviewed for assessment and treatment of dialysis ports insertion sites. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 01/11/19. Diagnosis included chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus and weakness. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact. Resident #18 required supervision with activities of daily living and used a wheelchair for mobility. Record review of the care plan dated 06/25/23 revealed Resident #18 will have no complications with access site and will receive renal dialysis without complications in coordination between dialysis center and facility. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 83 of 84 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. One resident (Residents #68) received enteral nutrition and did not receive meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/30/19 from 8:19 A.M. through 8:50 A.M. revealed the inside of the ice machine had black spots on the ice shoot. When wiped with a paper towel, the black residue was noted on the towel. The six-burner stove had grease and food build-up. The kitchen floor throughout the kitchen was dirty with greasy build-up around the edges, under the sink and under shelving. The shelf under the steam table was greasy and had crumbs on it. The sides of the steam oven, stove, fryer and coolers were dirty with dried on food. The floor in the dishwasher room had food spatters on the walls, and the floor under the dishwasher had thick grime build-up. The dishwasher doors had food build-up around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TSG NURSING CENTERS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2003
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO ANDREW M SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO GERALD F SCHROER JROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO MATTHEW SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 MARGARET S GOODMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
SUSANNE SCHROER DYNASTY TRUST U/AOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2019
THE SCHROER GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2001
MOCK, DOUGLASIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2021
FILM, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2019
GOODMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/15/2003
LOGAN, JUSTINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2022
NUTTER, ORIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
ALTERCARE OF OHIO, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2001

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 15%Medicare 3%Other / private 82%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$317per resident / day
operating cost
$9,626per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365268. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next