No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Altercare Of Canal Winchester Post-Acute Rc

6725 Thrush Drive, Canal Winchester, OH 43110 · For profit - Corporation · 72 certified beds · (614) 834-2500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jul 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$142,425 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $142,425 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
625 W Waterloo St Ste 210B · (614) 955-3430 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.7 mi
6266 Gender Rd · (614) 920-0287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.8 mi
720 W Waterloo St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6700 Thrush Dr · (614) 837-6178

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.1%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.2%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.6%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.8%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.0%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.3%12.9%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 198 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.6%CMS range 57.7–71.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 9.8–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.1–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
60.2%
Total nursing turnover
90.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 66.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

32
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-21)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to timely identify and seek necessary medical intervention following an acute change in condition for Resident #78. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, with actual serious life-threatening harm beginning on 03/12/26 at 12:34 P.M., when Resident #78 was noted to be lethargic (a reduced level of consciousness), with elevated blood glucose of 522 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL, normal results 70-99 mg/dL). The resident's blood sugar was not re-checked for four hours and remained elevated at 353 mg/dL when it was rechecked. The resident continued with limited food and fluid intake and lethargy. The facility failed to monitor the resident, provide comprehensive assessments, and medical support for the resident. On 03/13/26 at 8:30 A.M. Resident #78 became unresponsive and could not be awakened by a sternal rub (painful physical stimuli). Certified Nurse Practitioner, (CNP) #561 was notified,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for Resident #88's urinary catheter and failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized plan of care for the urinary (indwelling) catheter including consistent monitoring/assessment of urinary output to prevent a significant complication from catheter use. This affected one resident (#88) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 57 residents. Actual harm occurred on 08/26/25, when Resident #88, who was cognitively impaired, was noted to have a change in condition, which included blood and pus observed in his urinary catheter bag. Subsequently, Resident #88 was transported to the hospital on [DATE], where he was admitted and diagnosed with sepsis attributed to a mispositioned urinary catheter, which resulted in a blockage. Prior to the incident, on 08/13/25 Resident #88 had returned from an outpatient urology…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevent program to ensure residents were thoroughly assessed, interventions were initiated timely and in place as planned and/or staff timely identified the development new pressure ulcers. This affected two residents (#216 and #213) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 61. Actual Harm occurred on 08/04/24 when Resident #216, who was at risk for pressure ulcer development and dependent on staff for activities of daily living, was assessed to develop an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcer to the sacrum. On 08/13/24 the wound physician assessed the pressure ulcer to be a Stage IV (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to implement an effective and individualized pain management program for Resident #50 per physician's orders. This affected resident (#50) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 60. Actual harm occurred on 02/25/24 when Resident #50 experienced significant physical pain when her ordered narcotic pain medication was not administered for over 26 hours. The resident indicated during this time period, the pain which she reported was to her feet was rated a nine on a scale of one to 10 (with 10 being the most severe pain) limiting her ability to get out of bed and eat and causing her to cry. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/29/23 and diagnoses including chronic pain, paresthesia (a tingling or prickly pins and needles sensation), and fibromyalgia. Review of the plan of care dated 11/03/23 revealed has pain related to paresthesia of fingers/toes related to fibromyalgia. The goal included resident would verbalize they are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer as needed stool softeners to prevent a bowel obstruction. This affected one resident (#13) of three residents reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 66. Actual harm occurred on 12/28/23 to Resident #13, who had a diagnosis of constipation, when facility staff failed to assess and monitor the resident and failed to provide ordered medical treatment when the resident did not have a bowel movement for six days resulting in the resident experiencing a bowel obstruction requiring hospitalization and treatment. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, hypertension, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, and constipation. Additional diagnoses were added on 01/01/24 including encephalopathy and abdominal distention. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/03/23 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to promptly respond to resident and family concerns brought up by residents in resident council meetings. This had potential to affect all 57 residents at the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings include:Review of the resident council meeting minutes from August 2025 to March 2025 revealed attendance ranged from six to eleven residents. The minutes noted the following concerns:On 08/20/25 Aides are taking too long to answer call lights. Aides are busy on their phones and/or talking to one another. Aides are not taking food orders and they just drop off the food.On 09/17/25 Call lights and water pass are still a problem mainly on the weekends.On 10/15/25 Residents are concerned with their showers as well as aides being on their cell phones.On 02/18/26 Residents are concerned with not getting showers, beds not being changed. Aids are still not answering call lights, sitting at nurses desk, being on their phones, leaving food trays sit at nurses desk for long periods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, family, and staff interviews, nurse practitioner interview, record review, review of resident council meeting minutes, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of the residents. This affected nine residents (#39, #23, #84, #54, #4, #71, #31, #93, and #88) with the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.On 04/06/26 at 8:00 A.M., the survey team entered the facility for the annual recertification and complaint survey. There were one (1) medication tech, one (1) registered nurse (RN), three (3) licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and five (5) certified nurse aides (CNAs) to provide care for 57 residents currently residing in the facility. Review of the list of Directors of Nursing in the past year revealed that the current DON was hired on 03/05/26. Review of the Resident council meeting minutes from meetings on 08/20/25, 09/17/25, 10/01/25, 02/18/26 and 03/18/26 all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility assessment, review of the Administrator Job Description, and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This affected 21 residents (#39, #23, #84, #54, #4, #71, #78, #88, #31, #55, #91, #93, #6, #9, #12, #61, #85, #87, #83, #81, #86) and had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:1.During the course of the annual and complaint survey conducted from 04/06/26 to 04/21/26, the survey team requested information from the facility regarding the administration and leadership changes of the facility.Review of information provided to the survey team on 04/09/26 at 3:46 P.M. revealed the facility had five changes in Administrator since 06/08/23: 06/08/23 to 10/18/24 Administrator #60110/08/24 to 11/10/24 Administrator #60211/11/24 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, staff and resident interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal hygiene including assistance with eating, nail care, and bathing/showering. This affected seven (Residents #6, #9, #12, #61, #85, #87, and #93) of 12 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 57.Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 01/24/26 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, diabetes, morbid obesity, sepsis, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 01/30/26 revealed Resident #93 had short- and long-term memory problems. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance with personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for showers. The resident was always incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for five (Residents #9, #23, #74, #84 and #88) of 37 sampled residents reviewed in the course of the survey. The facility census was 57.Findings include:1. Medical record review revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 7:52 P.M. and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, other osteonecrosis left femur, unilateral primary osteoarthritis left hip, fatigue and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of physician orders for Resident #74 revealed an order dated 01/07/26 for Modafinil 200 milligrams to be given twice a day to promote wakefulness. Review of a progress note dated 01/08/26 at 12:52 A.M. revealed Resident #74 did not have meds at the facility. The author noted they called the pharmacy, and the pharmacy stated that resident wasn't in their system. The author called the provide and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that provided a safe and sanitary environment that helped to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This affected five (Residents #31, #81, #83, #84, and #86) 37 sampled residents sampled in the course of the survey. The facility census was 57. Findings include:1. Review of the record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 04/05/26 with diagnoses including acute and subacute infective endocarditis (infection of the heart's inner lining). The admission nursing note stated Resident #83 was admitted on [DATE] at 12:10 P.M. from the hospital with a peripherally inserted central line (PICC) and was going to be on intravenous (IV) antibiotics until 05/07/26. Review of hospital records revealed Resident #83 was diagnosed with Clostridioides difficile (C. diff), a bacterium causing severe diarrhea, fever, and colon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed treat the resident with respect and dignity to promote and enhance their quality of life. This affected one (Resident #84) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. The census was 57.Findings include:Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed she was admitted tot he facility on 04/03/26. Diagnoses included orthopedic aftercare, fall with fracture (at home), pain, dementia, osteoarthritis, and high blood pressure. Review of the physicians orders revealed orders dated 04/06/26 for an indwelling urinary catheter for urinary retention/possible bladder outlet obstruction and ensure catheter care is provider every shift.On 04/06/2026 at 9:59 A.M., Resident #84 was observed up in the TV lounge area in a wheelchair and a hospital gown. The resident's catheter bag was hanging from the wheelchair uncovered with urine exposed. Residents and staff were observed passing the area at the time of observation. On 04/06/2026 at 10:01 A.M., interview with Regional Corporate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical record, resident family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change in treatments. This affected one resident (Resident #55) out of thirty-seven residents reviewed during the annual survey process. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, dementia, bilateral open-angle glaucoma, bilateral combined forms of age-related cataracts, and vitreous degeneration of the right eye. Review of Resident #55's care plan dated 09/21/18 revealed that Resident #55 was at risk for decreased visual function as he had a diagnosis of cataracts. A long-term goal listed was that Resident #55 would not experience negative consequences of vision loss. Approaches listed to help Resident #55 achieve this goal included to administer medications as ordered and to obtain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interview, family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident/responsible party had the right to choose activities and schedules consistent with their interests, assessments, and care plan. This affected one resident (#6) of 37 sampled residents. The facility census was 57. Findings include:Review of the record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 and diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke), and aphasia (impaired speaking). He received all of his nutrition through a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube leading into the stomach). Review of the plan of care dated 03/21/25 revealed the resident had impaired cognition related to stroke and memory loss. Interventions included to involve the resident in daily care and decision making as much as possible. It stated to ask simple yes/no questions when able and as needed. The plan of care stated to involve resident in daily care and decision making as much as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the provider of significant weight change and weight refusals for Resident #95. This affected one resident (#95) of 37 residents reviewed for notifications. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included chronic systolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type II diabetes mellitus, other specified anxiety disorders, pneumonia, pleural effusion.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 03/24/25 for Resident #95 revealed Resident #95 was cognitively intact and required supervision or touching assistance with eating, toileting, showering, lower body dressing, putting on footwear, moving from sitting to lying, lying to sitting, chair transfer, toilet transfer and shower transfers. The MDS indicated there were no instances where Resident #95 rejected evaluation or care.Review of the provider orders for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of concern tracking logs, policy review, record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve complaints/grievances by resident/family members. This affected three residents (Residents #31, #55, and #93) of three residents reviewed for concerns and had the potential to affect all residents of the facility due to the lack of policy/procedure and system in place. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of facility Concern Tracking Logs revealed the logs listed the date, resident name, nature of concern, department, and date of resolution. The log did not give specifics of the nature of the concerns. Three residents (Residents #31, #55, and #93) were chosen for review of logged concerns as follows: a. On 03/02/26 it was noted that a concern for Resident #31 was submitted regarding response time. The date of resolution was 03/02/26. No further specifics were documented. Review of the record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 12/04/25. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#88) out of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Review of a closed medical record revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, need for assistance with personal care, disorientation and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #88's admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #88 was admitted to the facility with bruising to his bilateral upper extremities, dry scaly skin to his bilateral lower extremities below the knee, and a cancerous lesion that was removed prior to admission on his upper left back area. Review of Resident #88's Minimum Data Set comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 08,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to execute a timely discharge for a resident. This affected one resident (#41) of eight residents reviewed for the discharge process. The facility's census was 57.Findings include:Record review for Resident #41 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Parkinson's Disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease and dementia Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08. This resident was assessed to be require supervision or touching assistance, along with his walker or cane, for mobility. Review of the nursing progress notes in Resident #41's medical record revealed on 12/09/25 he was identified as being a high fall and high elopement risk. Review of the nursing progress notes in Resident #41's medical record revealed on 10/21/25, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interview, resident interview, policy review, and family interview, the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents in the areas of activities and dental status. This affected two residents (#6, #13) of 37 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 57.Findings include:1. Review of the record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 and diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke), and aphasia (impaired speaking). He received all of his nutrition through a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube leading into the stomach). Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 01/23/26 revealed the resident had short and long term memory problems, had a feeding tube, and was dependent upon staff for mobility, including transfers. Review of an admission activity assessment completed 03/09/25 revealed the resident's previous occupation was a cook. It stated he was not active in religion. It stated participation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop baseline plans of care that included the interventions necessary to properly care for residents within 48 hours of admission. This affected three (Residents #84, #86 and #93) of 37 residents reviewed for plans of care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that a summary of the baseline plan of care was provided to the resident or representative. This affected one (Resident #93) of 37 residents reviewed for plans of care. The census was 57.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare, fall with fracture (at home), pain, dementia, osteoarthritis, high blood pressure, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). No Minimum data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment was completed because she was a new admission. Further review of Resident #84's medical record on 04/08/26 revealed no baseline plan of care was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record reviews, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents. This affected three (Residents #6, 10, and 88) out of thirty-seven resident records reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 57 residents.Findings include:1. Review of a closed resident record revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #88 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 08 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #88 was assessed as being incontinent of bladder and not having a catheter present. Resident #88 was assessed as not having pressure ulcers present on admission. Review of Resident #88's comprehensive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure required plan of care meetings were held with residents and resident representatives. This affected one (Resident #4) of 37 resident records reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 57. Findings include:A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident #4 had moderately impaired cognition. She required supervision or touching assistance for eating, personal hygiene, and turning/repositioning; partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene and toileting; and substantial to maximal assistance for bathing/showers. She was occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel.Review of the care conference documentation for 2025 and 2026 revealed only two documented conferences: 05/22/25 and 09/11/25. There was no care conference in 2025 before 05/22/25 and no care conference in 2026.During an interview on 04/08/26 at 2:32 P.M., Social Service Coordinator (SSC) #208…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program based on resident preferences to create opportunities for a meaningful life. This affected one (Resident #6) of 37 sampled residents. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke), and aphasia (impaired speaking). He received all of his nutrition through a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube leading into the stomach). Review of an admission activity assessment completed 03/09/25 revealed Resident #6's previous occupation was a cook. He was not active in religion. Participation barriers included mobility and physical endurance. His general activity preferences included music and watching television. The assessment was completed with the resident. The focus of programming would be 1:1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary care and treatment as ordered to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This affected one resident (#93) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 57.Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 01/24/26 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, diabetes, morbid obesity, sepsis, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and peripheral vascular disease. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to a change in condition and did not return to the facility. The clinical admission assessment with an observation date of 01/24/26 stated the resident had impaired short and long term memory and was oriented to self only. It indicated the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder and was at moderate risk of skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 57Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included aphasia, high blood pressure, major depression, insomnia, anemia, cerebral infarction, anxiety and history of embolism.Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was moderately impaired. She required supervision or touching assistance for eating, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning, partial to moderate assistance oral hygiene, toileting, substantial to maximal assistance for shower/bathing. Occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. Review of the fall plan of care dated 05/21/21 revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to confusion/altered mental status, history of falls,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to The facility failed to ensure accurate and timely monitoring of Resident #93's weight, resulting in an undetected and unevaluated significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #93) of four residents reviewed for nutritional status. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Review of the record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 01/24/26 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, diabetes, morbid obesity, sepsis, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the admission assessment on 01/24/26 revealed Resident #93 refused to be weighed. Diet ordered: low concentrated sweets, mechanical soft diet with nectar thickened liquids. Review of the physician's order dated 01/24/26 revealed an order for weekly weights for four weeks. No evidence of further attempts to obtain weights until 02/05/26.Review of the physician's order dated 01/28/26 revealed the diet was changed to pureed with honey thickened liquids.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to appropriately check for placement of the gastrostomy tube prior to administration of medication. This affected one (Resident #6) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, high blood pressure, dysphagia following cerebral infarction and aphasia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed short- and long-term memory problems. Resident #6 was dependent on staff for bathing and personal hygiene and received enteral feedings via a gastrostomy tube (tube placed through the abdominal wall into the stomach). Observation on 04/13/26 at 8:31 A.M. revealed Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) #256 checked for placement by flushing the gastrostomy tube with 30 cubic centimeters (cc) of water and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #93 was provided with adequate pain management. This affected one (Resident #93) of two residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 01/24/26 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, diabetes, morbid obesity, sepsis, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, osteoarthritis, pain in thoracic spine, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the clinical admission assessment with an observation date of 01/24/26 revealed Resident #93 had impaired short- and long-term memory and was alert only to self. The resident had non-verbal expressions of pain (not specified) and had a pain level of three (scale went from no pain to 10). The frequency of pain was noted to be daily. There was no evidence the resident was offered or provided with any interventions for pain relief. A baseline care plan (part of the clinical admission assessment referenced above)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available to be administered for Resident #74. This affected one (Resident #74) resident out of 37 residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 7:52 P.M. and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, other osteonecrosis left femur, unilateral primary osteoarthritis left hip, fatigue and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Review of progress notes revealed on 01/07/26 at 7:52 P.M. Resident #74 arrived at the facility via transport from the hospital with a hip fracture. Review of physician orders for Resident #74 revealed the following orders with a start date of 01/07/26:a. acetaminophen 650 milligram (mg) tablet extended release to be given once a day along with 500 mg of acetaminophen. b. acetaminophen 500 mg to be given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication regimen reviews were completed monthly for Resident #8 and #11 and failed to follow-up timely on pharmacist's recommendations for Resident #7 and Resident #8. This affected three residents (#7, #8, and #11) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 57.Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #11 's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory disease, multiple sclerosis, dysphagia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and major depressive disorder. Review of the comprehensive minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact, evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. She was considered dependent for toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the medication regimen reviews (MRR) for Resident #11 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed with an adequate indication for use of the medications. This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 57.Findings include:Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, Von [NAME] disease, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, diabetes, depression, anxiety, high blood pressure and cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He required supervision or touching assistance with eating, setup or clean up assistance with oral hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and partial/moderate assistance for turning and repositioning. Review of the pharmacy recommendations on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors and that medications were given in accordance with physician's orders. This affected one resident (Resident #83) of 37 sampled residents. The facility census was 57. Findings Include:Review of Resident #83's hospital records (prior to admission to the facility) revealed he was diagnosed with Clostridioides difficile (C. diff), (a bacterium causing severe diarrhea, fever, and colon inflammation often triggered by antibiotic use) on 04/02/26. He was placed on Contact plus precautions in the hospital on [DATE]. Contact plus precautions were noted as enhanced infection control measures used, alongside standard precautions, to prevent the spread of highly contagious pathogens, particularly C. diff. He was started on antibiotic treatment Vancomycin 125 milligrams every six hours for the C. diff on 04/02/26 which was to conclude on 04/15/26. Review of the record for Resident #83 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete labs as ordered for two residents. This affected two residents (#88 and 90) out of thirty-seven medical records reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of a closed resident record revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #88's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #88 was assessed as being incontinent of bladder and not having a catheter present. Review of Resident #88's nursing progress notes dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #88 was confused, agitated and restless. Resident #88 complained of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assist Resident #13 in obtaining dental services. This affected one resident (#13) of one resident reviewed for non-Medicaid dental services. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/06/25 with diagnoses including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. The resident was on a regular diet. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 11/12/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, indicating intact cognition. It further stated the resident had obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. A consent for dental treatment was signed by Resident #13 on 02/16/26. Review of a plan of care dated 03/10/26 revealed a potential for alteration in dental/oral status related to aging process and poor nutrition. The goal was for the resident to be free of dental/oral discomfort,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining dental services. This affected two residents (#10 and #62) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1.Record review for Resident #10 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, muscle weakness, hypertension, congestive heart failure, asthma, chronic kidney failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Review of the care conference note for Resident #10, dated 10/29/25, revealed no evidence or mention of Resident #10 declining dental services.Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], Resident #10 had no natural teeth or tooth fragments.Review of Resident #10's care plan dated 01/14/26 revealed the resident was at risk for oral complications due to him being edentulous. Interventions on the care plan included to encourage resident to wear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for nutritional supplements for Resident #60 to maximize the healing potential of wounds. This affected one resident (#60) of three reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 63.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 08/28/25. Pertinent diagnoses included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, chronic kidney disease stage 4 (severe), acute kidney failure, depression, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage; pressure ulcer of left heel, unspecified stage, and obesity.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had moderately impaired cognition. The resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and she had three stage 4 pressure ulcers on admission.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, concern log review, Resident Council Meeting review and record review the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were addressed timely and appropriately. This affected seven residents (#2, #15, 16, #17, #21, #26, #37) who were identified to regularly attend resident council. Facility census was 58.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 01/15/25 revealed concerns of good staff leaving, snacks and water not being offered, medications administered late, and cold food. It was mentioned cold food was also addressed the previous month (12/24 meeting). There were no concerns documented for January 2025 in the concern log.2. Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 02/19/25 revealed concerns of care issues with showers and activities of daily living and issues with food and drink.Review of the concern log revealed no mention of other concerns from Resident Council and no resolutions or evidence of follow up was provided.3. Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 03/19/25 revealed concerns of evening medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview and record review, facility failed to ensure menus and spreadsheets were followed and full meals were provided. This affected five Residents #18, #19, #20, #38 and #57 of five reviewed for nutrition. Facility census was 58. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 03/11/24. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, dementia and aphasia. Review of physician orders dated 03/13/24 for regular diet with puree texture. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was not preformed and stated resident was rarely if ever understood, indicating impaired cognition. Observation and interview on 07/28/25 from 12:20 P.M. to 12:30 P.M. during tray line observation with Kitchen staff #102 and #181 and Regional Kitchen Manager (RKM) #206 revealed a meal ticket for Resident #57 stating puree cookies for lunch meal 07/28/25. Resident #57's tray was made with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, record review and policy review, facility failed to ensure residents were placed in proper isolation type, with appropriate signage. Facility also failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable to isolation status of residents and failed to wear the correct personal protective equipment (PPE). This affected four Residents #19, #20, #23, and #24 of four reviewed for isolation status. Facility also failed to ensure proper sanitization of the glucometer affecting Resident #12 and ensure infection control was maintained during medication administration affecting Resident #68. Facility census was 58. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/22/24. Diagnoses included obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, COVID-19, and atrial fibrillation. Review of progress note dated 07/16/25 revealed resident tested positive for COVID-19, resident family contacted. Progress note dated 07/28/25 at 1:54 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, record review and policy review, facility failed to ensure falls were investigated thoroughly, appropriate interventions were implemented based on the cause of the falls and ensure interventions were in place per the care plan. This affected three Residents #2, #23, and #63 of three reviewed for falls. Facility census was 58. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait, hypertension, diabetes and dysphagia. Review of the Care Plan dated [DATE] revealed interventions for falls prevention including: observe resident safety by looking in room when passing added [DATE]Physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy added [DATE]Pharmacy and Physician to review medication with resident visits added [DATE]report medication side effects added [DATE]encourage resident to use call light for transfer/ambulation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of employee file and policy review, facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication error when Narcotics were not given as ordered and documented for Resident #67 and medications were not given as ordered for Resident #66 upon admission. This affected two Residents #66 and #67 of three reviewed for medications. Facility census was 58. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia without behaviors, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, osteoporosis and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of three indicating significant impaired cognition. Review of the Physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] to [DATE] for Gabapentin capsule 300 MG with instructions to take one capsule twice daily at 6:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. A second order dated [DATE] to [DATE] for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was conducted during medication administration for Resident #105 of three reviewed (#28 and #104), and the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in placed and followed for three (Resident #2, #19 and #104) of three reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 09/14/24 with diagnoses not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, hypertension, pneumonia and gastro-esophageal disease. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 09/21/24 revealed Resident #105 was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation of medication administration on 09/24/24 at 7:37 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor #207 revealed after administering Resident #105's medication, hand hygiene was not performed. RN Supervisor #207 arrived at the nurse's cart,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30's needs were addressed in a timely manner when she waited for 29 minutes for her call light to be answered. This affected one resident (#30) of one resident reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/06/22 with diagnoses including acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity, adult failure to thrive, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #30's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed intact cognition. She required substantial or maximal assistance to roll left and right in bed. Interview on 09/25/24 at 10:43 A.M. Resident #30 revealed she was uncomfortable in her current position and wanted someone to pull her up. The call light was triggered at that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the security and confidentiality of medical records during routine medication administration, leaving information visible to the public. This affected two (Resident #104 and #105) out of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 09/14/24 with diagnoses not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, hypertension, pneumonia and gastro-esophageal disease. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 09/21/24 revealed Resident #105 was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation of medication administration on 09/24/24 at 7:37 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor #207 began by reviewing the medication administration record (MAR) for medications to be administered to Resident #105. Resident # 105 required a blood pressure reading prior to administration of her medications which required RN supervisor #207 to obtain a blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide set up meal assistance to a resident with limited range of motion. This affected one (Resident #213) of three residents who require set up assistance with meals. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #213 revealed an admission date of 09/09/24 with diagnoses not limited to osteoporosis, left femur nailing, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, fracture of upper end of left humerus and history of falls. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 09/16/24 revealed Resident #213 had a severe cognitive impairment, required set up assistance with eating and oral hygiene. Review of admission assessment completed 09/09/24 revealed upon admission, Resident #213 presented with left upper extremity edema and expressed a daily pain level of 3 due to fractures in the left femur and humerus. Nutritional assessment indicated Resident #213's nutritional status was probably inadequate, as she rarely consumed a complete meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #2 and #19 and failed to ensure complete and timely investigations were completed for Resident #2 and #205. This affected three residents (#2, #19, and #205) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/20/24 with diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, unspecified fracture of left talus, dislocation of internal left hip prosthesis, unspecified dementia, depression, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #2's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed intact cognition. She had one fall with no injury since admission and one fall with a non-major injury. Review of Resident #2's fall investigation (event) dated 08/23/24 revealed at 7:13 P.M. she had a fall in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #38 had reasonable access to fluids. They additionally failed to ensure Resident #19 was weighed monthly and failed to ensure Resident #2's significant weight change was addressed and that her nutrition status was accurately assessed. This affected three residents (#2, #19, and #38) of six residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/20/21 with diagnoses including hypertension, muscle weakness, vascular dementia, chronic diastolic heart failure, dysphagia, bipolar disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a severe cognitive impairment. He required set up or clean up assistance with eating. Review of Resident #38's plan of care on 09/23/24 revealed it did not address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were attempted and documented prior to administering 'as needed' anxiety medication. This affected one resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/20/24 with diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, unspecified fracture of left talus (08/23/24), dislocation of internal left hip prosthesis, unspecified dementia, hypertension, depression, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease. chronic pain, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #2's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed intact cognition. Review of Resident #2's plan of care dated 09/06/24 revealed the resident received psychotropic medications including an antidepressant and antianxiety medication. Interventions included physician and pharmacist to review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #42) timely received speech therapy services regarding a change in nutritional condition/status. This affected one of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 61. Findings Include: Review of Resident # 42's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/26/24. Further review revealed diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, diabetes and encounter for attention to gastrostomy tube. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had a feeding tube and was receiving a mechanically altered diet. Review of Resident #42's physician's orders revealed an order dated 06/07/24 that read moist mechanical soft (no breads) with nectar thick liquids. Review of Resident #42's nursing progress notes dated 07/23/24 revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of facility Self-Reported incident (SRI), review of facility investigation, resident and staff interview and policy review the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #21's prescribed narcotics. This affected one resident (#21) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 04/30/21 with diagnoses including myasthenia gravis without exacerbation, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, was on a scheduled pain medication regime, and reported no pain during the previous five days. Review of Resident #21's plan of care dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility Self-Reported incident (SRI), review of facility investigation, resident and staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to timely investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one resident (#21) of three reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 04/30/21 with diagnoses including myasthenia gravis without exacerbation, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, was on a scheduled pain regimen and reported no pain during the previous five days. Review of Resident #21's plan of care dated 05/07/24 revealed he had an alteration in comfort or pain related to diagnoses of myasthenia gravis and osteoarthritis. Interventions included reminding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received timely and physician ordered treatment after a change in condition. This affected one of three sampled residents ( #63). The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 02/15/24 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, hypertension, and syncope. The resident was admitted from the hospital after a stay from 02/11/24 to 02/15/24 following a syncopal episode. Upon discharge from the hospital, medication orders included an albuterol inhaler two puffs every four hours as needed for wheezing (used to treat or prevent bronchospasms in individual's with lung diseases). A nursing progress note on 02/19/24 at 2:16 P.M. revealed the physician was in to see Resident #63. Review of a history and physical completed by the physician on 02/19/24 revealed the resident had been seen at the hospital from [DATE] to 02/15/24 for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented. This affected two of three sampled residents (#50, #63). The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/29/23 and diagnoses including chronic pain, paresthesia (a tingling or prickly pins and needles sensation), and fibromyalgia. Record review revealed a physician's order 11/10/23 for Oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) 5 milligrams every eight hours (scheduled at 6:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 10:00 P.M.). Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 01/27/24 revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Interview with Resident #50 on 03/04/24 at 11:05 A.M. revealed the weekend before last, the facility ran out of her Oxycodone pain medication. She stated she did not get the medication for 26 hours. She stated that not receiving the medication caused her to have severe pain which she described as a 9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment for resident showers. This affected one resident (#64). The facility census was 60. Findings include: Observations of the shower in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 03/04/24 at 1:40 P.M. revealed there were four areas of dried brown material on the floor of the shower that appeared to be bowel movement. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 03/04/24 at 1:40 P.M. confirmed the dried brown material on the floor of the shower in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. She stated that there was currently not a resident residing in the this room. She stated the resident who had resided in the room had went to the hospital the previous day (Resident #64). She stated Resident #64 had not used the shower and did not use a bedside commode/bedpan. She stated that if a resident used a bedside commode/bedpan, it should be emptied in the toilet, not the shower. She stated the dried brown material should not be there. This deficiency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of weight gain as ordered. This affected one resident (#13) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, hypertension, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, and constipation. Additional diagnoses were added on 01/01/24 including encephalopathy and abdominal distention. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/03/23 revealed Resident #13 had intact cognition, no behaviors, was always incontinent of bowel, and was dependent on staff for toileting assistance. In addition, Resident #13 had an order started on 05/01/22 to record daily weight and if there was a two-pound weight gain in one day or five-pound weight gain in one week notify the physician. Resident #13 gained four pounds on 12/04/23, gained two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform oral hygiene for Resident #4 and #9, shaving assistance for Resident #9, showers, and nail care for Resident #317 and #322. This affected four residents (Resident #4, #9, #317, and #322) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 02/07/22 wit diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), reduced mobility, cognitive communication deficit, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, history of positive for COVID-19 on 01/10/22, chronic atrial fibrillation, iron deficiency anemia, and pneumonia. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/10/22 for limited assistance of one staff member for oral hygiene. Review of the comprehensive Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to sufficiently staff the facility to provide activities of daily living assistant for Resident #4, #9, #317, and #322. This affected four residents (Resident #4, Resident #9, Resident #317, and Resident #322) of eight residents reviewed for sufficient staffing. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 02/07/22 wit diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), reduced mobility, cognitive communication deficit, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, history of positive for COVID-19 on 01/10/22, chronic atrial fibrillation, iron deficiency anemia, and pneumonia. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/10/22 for limited assistance of one staff member for oral hygiene. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #51's call light was within his reach. This affected one resident (Resident #51) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed he admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, type two diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, bipolar disorder, depression, acute embolism and thrombosis of iliac vein, spinal stenosis, aphasia, and intervertebral disc degeneration. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had intact cognition. He required the extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and the assistance of two staff for transfers. Review of the plan of care dated 05/04/22 related to activity of daily living functioning revealed Resident #51 needed therapy services related to a decline in prior function of activities of daily living, diagnoses, difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify and treat Resident #4's stage III pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus without complications, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), reduced mobility, cognitive communication deficit, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, history of positive for COVID-19 on 01/10/22, chronic atrial fibrillation, iron deficiency anemia, and pneumonia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/14/22, revealed the resident had (intact/ impaired) cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (no impairment) and no documented behaviors. The resident required extensive assistance of one to two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, observations, medical record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 and #46 oxygen (O2) equipment was stored properly and Resident #4's oxygen orders were documented accurately. This affected two Residents (#4 and #46) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 02/19/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with (acute) exacerbation, chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), other nonspecific abnormal finding of lung field, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/28/22, revealed Resident #46 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15 (moderate impairment). The resident required limited to extensive assistance of one to two or more staff members for all activities of daily living (ADL's).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident #8 social services to obtain sufficient clothing. This affected one resident (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed for social services. Findings include: Resident #8's was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnosis including anxiety, depression, cognition, pain, wheezing, UTI, glaucoma, restless leg syndrome and depression. Resident #8's medical record revealed she did not have family and she had a lawyer for power of attorney. The record identified Resident #8 resided in an apartment prior to falling, going to the hospital and then being admitted at the facility. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed she was cognitively intact, with periods of confusion. The MDS indicated it was very important for Resident #8 to take care of belongings. Observation of Resident #8 on 05/23/22 at 12:21 P.M. revealed the resident had a pair of jeans and shirt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$142,425 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $75,634 — penalty dated 2026-04-21
  • $44,268 — penalty dated 2024-09-26
  • $22,523 — penalty dated 2024-03-06
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-25 for 21 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TSG NURSING CENTERS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/07/2007
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO ANDREW M SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO GERALD F SCHROER JROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO MATTHEW SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 MARGARET S GOODMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
SUSANNE SCHROER DYNASTY TRUST U/AOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
THE SCHROER GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/07/2007
MOCK, DOUGLASIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2021
FILM, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2018
GOODMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/07/2007
JOHNSON, KATHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2010
NUTTER, ORIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2020
ALTERCARE OF OHIO, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/07/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$928K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 15%Other / private 75%

This home reported $928K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$369per resident / day
operating cost
$11,219per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$335per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366367. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next