Altercare Cambridge Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to timely identify and address a resident's change in condition following a mechanical lift transfer. This affected one resident (#55) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 47. Actual harm occurred on 11/16/25 when Resident #55, who was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance for activities of daily living, slammed her body down into a sit-to-stand (mechanical lift) device on her right side and back due to an episode of increased weakness. The facility staff failed to notify the resident's medical provider of the change in condition including the episode of weakness and slamming of the right side of her body and back down into the sit-to-stand device. The resident was assessed at the time with no injuries noted. Following the initial assessment, there was no documented evidence of ongoing monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer program to timely identify, treat and/or prevent a decline of pressure ulcers. This affected two residents (Resident #42 and #07) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Actual Harm occurred on 12/06/25 when Resident #42, who had been identified at risk for pressure ulcer development and required maximum staff assistance for bed mobility, returned from the hospital with a red and blanchable area to his (unidentified) buttock without evidence of a comprehensive skin assessment or implementation of pressure relieving interventions or wound treatment to prevent decline in the pressure ulcer. On 12/11/25, a skin assessment identified a new Stage III (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed) pressure ulcer to the coccyx without implementation of pressure relieving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of the medical record, review of the facility policy, and interview with staff the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications were not used beyond 14 days without rationale. This affected two residents (#1, #51) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis, pneumonia, dysphagia, end stage renal disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, congestive heart failure, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, macular degeneration, vitamin D deficiency, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, depression, hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had intact cognition, had no behaviors, and was not on any antipsychotic medications. Review of the December 2025 physician's orders revealed Resident #1 had an order for lorazepam (benzodiazepine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, facility investigation review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation following an allegation of abuse. This affected one (#55) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47.Findings include: Review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #267738 submitted to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) on 11/19/25 revealed an investigation was initiated by the facility for an allegation of physical abuse. The SRI revealed Resident #55 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] following a non-SRI related critical lab finding. Resident #55's daughter contacted the facility on 11/19/25 to report the resident had bruising on her right hip and possibly small bruises on her back. There was no alleged perpetrator. Staff were interviewed and it was revealed that over the weekend 11/15-11/16/25 staff had attempted to utilize a mechanical lift known as a sit-to-stand to safely transfer the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a person-centered, comprehensive care plan, developed and implemented to meet the preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. This affected two residents (#37, #48) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 47.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis; muscle weakness; need for assistance with personal care; methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus; bacteremia; noncompliance with other medical treatment and regimen; Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy; depression; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; anxiety disorder; hyperlipidemia; hypokalemia; anemia; acute kidney failure; hyperglycemia; and gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0, dated 11/18/25, for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored. This affected one resident (#27) of one resident reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 47.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #27, revealed an admission date of 08/19/21. Diagnoses included: spinal stenosis, lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, Alzheimer's disease, dementia and major depressive disorder.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14. Observation on 12/22/25 at 10:23 A.M. revealed a medicine cup containing four pills on Resident #27's bedside table. Resident #27 stated she does not know how long they have been there.Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #27 did not have an order to self-administer medications or for medications to be left at bedside.Interview on 12/22/25 at 10:25 A.M. with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, self reported incident review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the incident log was complete and accurate for a resident fall and failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete. This affected one resident (#55) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 47.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 09/24/25. Diagnoses included infection following a procedure surgical site, cellulitis of left lower limb, muscle weakness, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, repeated falls, fracture of left femur, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anemia, and anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0, dated 10/13/25, revealed a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of seven on a 0-15 scale. A BIMS score of seven would indicate severe problems with thinking and memory. It also indicated the resident needed assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of a Care Plan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the job descriptions, review of the employee handbook, review of a self-reported incident investigation, review of timed stamped and dated photographs, review of the facility assessment, review of time sheets, interviews, policy review, and review of the Nurse Practice Act, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided within acceptable standards of quality when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #133 was observed pre-pouring resident medications and also observed sleeping multiple times throughout the shift. This had the potential to affect the residents residing on the Rodeo Unit where LPN #133 was working. The facility census was 48.1. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #133's timecard dated 11/06/25 and 11/07/24 revealed LPN #133 clocked in at 11:54 P.M. on 11/06/25 and clocked out at 6:12 P.M. on 11/07/24. The LPN worked 17.75 hours.Review of photographs dated 11/07/24 at 4:33 A.M., revealed LPN #133 standing in front of medication cart with the card drawer open. There were approximately nine medication cups with several loose pills in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received timely pain management. This affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The census was 48. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, hypertension, thyroid atrophy, hypomagnesemia, anxiety, and femur fracture with surgical intervention.Review of Resident #50 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C for cognition revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15, indicating Resident #50 was cognitively intact.Review of MDS section J for health conditions revealed Resident #50 was receiving a scheduled pain medication regimen, and received as needed (PRN) pain medication.Review of Resident #50 care plan completed on 06/11/25 revealed Resident #50 has a left hip surgical wound. Goals include resident will have controlled pain and a level of comfort maintained daily. Interventions include to administer pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for Resident #100. This affected one resident (#100) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of urinary tract infections and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The resident returned to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia, prostate cancer, obstructive uropathy, and an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making and utilized an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the Physician Orders dated 12/30/24 revealed Resident #100 was ordered a suprapubic catheter to straight drainage. On 12/30/24 at 9:19 A.M., observation revealed Resident #100 and Resident #83 were sitting in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) document accurately reflected medications and a psychiatric hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #37) of four residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 46. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, dementia with psychotic disturbance, and panic disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/19/24, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and received an anti-anxiety medication. Review of Resident #37's PASRR document, dated 08/26/24, revealed under Section E, no anti-anxiety medication. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated 03/29/24, revealed the order for Xanax 0.5 milligrams (mg) to be administered three times per day.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed weekly and documented as administered in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #8) of two residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Observations of Resident #8 on 09/03/24 at 9:26 A.M. revealed the resident lying in bed. Supplemental oxygen was supplied by an oxygen concentrator (machine that separates nitrogen from atmospheric air delivering 95% pure oxygen) via a nasal cannula. No evidence of any date to the tubing and nasal cannula was observed. Additional observations of Resident #8 on 09/03/24 at 3:58 P.M., 09/04/24 at 7:38 A.M. and 09/04/24 at 12:05 P.M. revealed supplemental oxygen in use by Resident #8 with no date on the tubing. Observation on 09/05/24 at 9:50 A.M. revealed Resident #8 sitting in her recliner and supplemental oxygen lying on her bed with the tubing undated. Interview with Resident #8 on 09/05/24 at 9:50 A.M. revealed that she uses the supplemental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $246K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH