Altercare Coshocton Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 67.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, podiatrist note review, facility contract review, policy review, the American Association of Diabetes Standards of Diabetic Care 2025 and Cleveland Clinic web resource review, and facility staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure routine podiatry services and toenail trimming were provided to Resident #11 every one to three months as recommend by the American Diabetic Association Standards of Diabetic Care 2025 for individuals at high risk for development of diabetic ulcers. This affected one resident (#11) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 71. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission to facility on 07/21/24 with diagnoses including diabetes, diabetic peripheral angiopathy, gout, cellulitis right lower leg, diabetes, chronic lung disease, peripheral vascular disease (poor circulation from hardening or blockage of blood vessels in limbs including peripheral artery disease), heart disease, kidney disease, morbid obesity, heart failure, high…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store food products to prevent contamination. The facility also failed to maintain a clean, sanitary environment to prevent contamination of food prepared in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect 68 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility census was 71.Findings include:On 09/29/25 at 8:45 A.M., in the kitchen, an observation of the area around the steam table and the stove top were covered in water, food substance and other white substances. This was confirmed by Dietary Coordinator (DC) #124 during the observation and tour of the kitchen. On 09/29/25 at 8:50 A.M., an observation of the kitchen area revealed a squeeze bottle with yellow liquid. The bottle was unlabeled and undated and sitting out on the metal preparation area table. On 09/29/25 at 8:55 A.M., DC #124 confirmed the yellow liquid in the bottle was butter and was unlabeled and undated. She reported this had been out on the preparation table since the night before. On 09/29/25 at 8:55 A.M., an observation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. This had the potential to affect four (#36, #68, #3, and #33) of four residents identified by the facility to be ordered pureed diets. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the facility menu for 09/29/25 revealed pureed Citrus Glazed Turkey and Prince [NAME] Vegetables for the lunchtime meal. Dietary Coordinator (DC) #124 confirmed the menu, which she indicated was supplied to the facility, along with a recipe for each pureed item, by corporate. On 09/29/25 at 10:48 A.M., an observation and interview of [NAME] #113 revealed he was preparing pureed Prince [NAME] Vegetables for four residents. [NAME] #113 added four-4 ounce (oz) scoops of prepared Prince [NAME] Vegetables to the food processor, (four ounces of vegetables per resident serving). He then added two cups of hot water, and indicated the mixture was to be baby food consistency and should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident representative was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the proposed care, the treatment alternatives or other options and was able to choose the option he or she preferred. This affected one (#10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 07/14/25. She was admitted with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, dysphagia of oropharyngeal phase, obstructive and reflux uropathy, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension, major depressive disorder, single episode, hypotension, hyperlipidemia, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, gastro-esophageal reflux, morbid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident financial record review, staff interview/email communication, and facility in-service documentation review, the facility failed to ensure all resident funds were placed in an interest-bearing account. This affected one (#44) of five residents reviewed for financial accounts. The census was 71.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were dementia, schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, drug induced akathisia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, edema, type II diabetes, pure hypercholesterolemia, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, chronic kidney disease (stage III), cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, depression, paranoid personality disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obesity, vitamin D deficiency, other specified anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/08/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident financial record review, staff interview/email communication, and facility in-service documentation review, the facility failed to ensure all resident funds were not co-mingled in other facility accounts. This affected one (#44) of five residents reviewed for financial accounts. The census was 71. Findings Include:Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were dementia, schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, drug induced akathisia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, edema, type II diabetes, pure hypercholesterolemia, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, chronic kidney disease (stage III), cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, depression, paranoid personality disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obesity, vitamin D deficiency, other specified anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/08/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and documented their decision in regards to continuation of skilled therapy services and their inpatient stay at the facility as required. This affected two residents (#53, #60) of three residents sampled. The census was 71. Findings include:1. Medical record review revealed Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, muscle weakness and difficulty walking.Review of the SNF ABN dated 08/11/25 revealed Resident #60's inpatient skilled facility services including their inpatient stay at the facility would no longer be covered as of 08/14/25. The SNF ABN identified three options for the resident to chose including to continue receiving services and bill Medicare, continue to receive services without billing Medicare, or do not continue the skilled care. The SNF ABN indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents observed for skin treatments. The census was 71. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, pyoderma (bacterial skin infection), and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection of the scalp. Review of the Dermatology Physician Assistant Progress Note dated 08/21/25 revealed treatment orders for Resident #22's pyoderma included to apply a thick layer of gentamicin 0.1 % ointment to the red areas on her scalp and inside her nose twice a day until healed. On 09/29/25 at 11:53 A.M., observation revealed Resident #22's privacy curtain and wall next to the bed had a dried brown substance smeared on both surfaces. On 09/30/25 between 9:00 A.M. and 9:13 A.M., observation revealed Resident #22 was laying in bed. The resident's privacy curtain, pillow and wall next…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to review baseline care plans with newly admitted residents within the required timeframe. This affected one resident (#81) of four newly admitted residents sampled. The census was 71. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including left hip replacement revision and diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed an unsigned Baseline Care Plan dated 09/27/25. There was no evidence the resident was provided the baseline care plan or that it had been reviewed with him. Review of the Clinical admission Documentation assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision-making. The document indicated the facility was to obtain a resident signature and date confirming the baseline care plan was provided to them. Review of the record revealed no evidence this was completed. On 09/29/25 at 10:10 A.M., interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide nail care to a dependent resident. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). The census was 71. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, schizoaffective disorder, pyoderma and cerebral vascular accident. Review of the electronic Profile Sheet dated 01/17/25 revealed the resident was dependent on staff for nail care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, had functional impairment of the upper and lower extremities and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene which included nail care. Review of the care plan: ADL (activities of daily living) Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential revised 08/15/25 revealed impaired ability to perform ADL's due to weakness and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services related to the treatment of constipation, preventative measures for urinary tract infections, and post-operative treatment of hip surgery. This affected two residents (#22, #81) of seven residents reviewed for quality of care and treatment. The facility census was 71. Findings include:1. Medical record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, schizoaffective disorder and chronic idiopathic constipation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, was always incontinent of bowel, dependent on staff for toileting, and was receiving antibiotics and opioid medications. a. Review of Resident #22's Bowel Records revealed no evidence of a bowel movement (BM) between 07/31/25, 08/01/25, 08/02/25, 08/03/25 and 08/04/25. Review of the Bowel Records dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $323K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH