Altercare Of Mayfield Village, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 129 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 44.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of 911 communications, review of the American Heart Association (AHA) guidance for adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), review of Ohio Revised Code related to pronouncement of death, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #46, who had a Full Code status, received appropriate and timely emergency response (including CPR) consistent with the resident's advance directives, facility policy, professional standards of practice, and physician expectations. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death on [DATE] at 7:20 A.M. when Resident #46 was found unresponsive (without vital signs) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #509 discontinued cardiopulmonary recusation (CPR) without a physician order, without emergency medical services (EMS) present, and without the qualifications necessary to pronounce the resident deceased . Additionally, LPN #510 failed to ensure EMS response by canceling or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility procedure review, the facility failed to ensure medications were ordered and available in a timely manner for newly admitted residents. This affected one (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for timely medication administration. The census was 42. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were chronic kidney disease (stage IV), spinal stenosis, weakness, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty walking, obstructive and reflux uropathy, schizophrenia, spondylosis, migraine, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #41's progress note dated 12/11/24 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 8:14 P.M. Review of Resident #41's progress note dated 12/12/24 revealed information that some medications needed to be clarified with the physician and faxed to the pharmacy. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30 had a comprehensive care plan regarding interventions to maintain her peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) (a catheter inserted through the arm vein and passed through to larger veins near the heart) line and monitor her intravenous (IV) antibiotics. This affected one resident (#30) out of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 11/01/24 with diagnoses including endocarditis (serious infection of the heart's inner lining), cognitive communication deficit, hypotension, and heart failure. Review of the undated comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #30's care plan only included areas related to activities and nutrition. There was nothing in her care plan related to interventions to maintain the PICC line or the IV antibiotic use due to endocarditis. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) (a catheter inserted through the vein in the arm and passed through to larger veins near the heart) line dressing changes were changed as ordered, and failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained to maintain the PICC line, including flushing before and after intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy and changing of IV tubing timely. This affected one resident (#30) out of one resident with an IV. The facility census was 41. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 11/01/24 with diagnoses including endocarditis (serious infection of the heart's inner lining), cognitive communication deficit, hypotension, and heart failure. Review of the undated comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #30's care plan only included areas related to activities and nutrition. There was nothing in her care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to change Resident #38's PICC (peripheral inserted central catheter) line dressing as ordered. This affected one resident (#38) of three residents reviewed for PICC line dressings. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/22/24. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, discitis, dorsalgia, diabetes mellitus type 2, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 03/28/24 indicated Resident #38 had no cognitive impairment. Observation and interview on 04/17/24 at 8:39 A.M. with Resident #38 complained the facility nurses were not changing her right arm PICC line dressing as ordered. It had been about two weeks since the last change and finally it was completed the day prior, 04/16/24. The PICC dressing on Resident #38's right arm was dated 04/16/24. Review of Resident #38's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/26/24 to change PICC line dressing every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-02 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing data was submitted appropriately to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 36. Findings include: Review of the CMS staffing data report for quarter three of the 2023 fiscal year (from April 1 to June 30 2023) revealed the facility did not submit staffing data for the affected quarter. Interview with the Administrator on 10/31/23 at 8:37 A.M. confirmed the above findings.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen of each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a pharmacist and ensure pharmacy recommendations were acted upon. This affected four of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #26, #30, #13, and #33). The total census was 36. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #26 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, and cardiomegaly. Record review of pharmacy communications regarding Resident #26 revealed she had a recommendation from pharmacy dated 01/03/23 for a digoxin lab with the next blood draw and every six months thereafter. The recommendation was marked as accepted, however no evidence was found of any digoxin lab draw being done until 09/05/23. Additionally, a recommendation dated 05/01/23 asked for a comprehensive metabolic panel on the next lab draw and to be repeated every 12 months…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, medical record review and policy review the facility did not ensure Resident #48 was free of a significant medication error. This affected one resident (Resident #48) out of one resident reviewed for insulin administration. This had the potential to affect eight residents (Resident #6, #10, #20, #18, #30, #33, #47, and #48) that had orders for insulin. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 10/13/23 and diagnoses included diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Review of care plan dated 10/16/23 revealed Resident #48 had an alteration in blood glucose metabolism related to her diagnosis of diabetes. Interventions included to administer diabetic medications per physician orders and observe for signs of hypoglycemia/ hyperglycemia. Review of November 2023 physician orders for Resident #48 revealed she had an order for lispro (a rapid acting insulin) insulin pen to administer three units subcutaneously (SQ) with meals scheduled at 7:30 A.M. and an order for insulin lispro insulin pen to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of facility investigation, and interviews with facility staff and residents, the facility failed to ensure food served to the residents was free of mold. This affected one resident (Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for palatable food. The facility census was 45. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included right tibia fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia right dominant side, Hepatitis C, osteomyelitis, depression, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, liver disease, alcohol abuse and cocaine abuse. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the progress notes dated 09/13/23 revealed Resident #24 was upset about the food on his tray, the nurse did not see his tray because the resident had already eaten his meal. Resident #24 came out of his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within residents' reach. This affected two (Residents #35 and #36) of two residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 27 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 03/04/21. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and lack of coordination. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Interview on 06/21/21 at 1:42 P.M. with Resident #36 revealed she wanted to ask staff about her shower. During the interview, Resident #36 attempted to reach for her call light; however, the call light was on the other side of her bed near the headboard tucked under the bed linen, and Resident #36 was sitting in her wheelchair near the foot of the bed. Interview on 06/21/21 at 1:48 P.M. with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident in writing of the reason the reason for transfer. This affected three (Residents #3, #41 and #43) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 27 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, urinary tract infection, and heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and had active diagnosis of acute respiratory failure and had a kidney transplant. Review of Resident's #3 progress notes revealed on 04/26/21 at 12:59 P.M. the resident was transported 911 the hospital for an evaluation due abnormal laboratory result. There was no documented evidence to indicate the resident was notified in writing of the reason for the transfer. 2. Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's, and heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$72,646 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $72,646 — penalty dated 2026-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $670K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH