No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Altercare Of Nobles Pond, INC

7006 Fulton Drive, NW, Canton, OH 44718 · For profit - Corporation · 71 certified beds · (330) 834-4800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 834-4800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jun 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jun 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7292 Fulton Dr NW · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7138 Fulton Dr NW · (330) 236-2130 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7138 Fulton Dr NW · (330) 834-3400 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7350 Cheryl Lane Street Northwest · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%5.3%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%0.4%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.3%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.0%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.5%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.3%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%12.9%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 152 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.72U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.37hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.8%CMS range 51.7–67.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 9.3–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.5–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.98
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
61.7%
Total nursing turnover
52.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 63.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate sanitation and temperature tracking logs were maintained, failed to ensure resident foods were stored at an appropriate temperatures, and failed to ensure the resident refrigerator for outside foods was monitored and food was appropriately labeled and discarded when expired. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 61.Findings include: 1.Observation on 03/16/26 at 8:40 A.M. during the initial kitchen tour with [NAME] #607 revealed the March 2026 sanitizer tracking log, food service cart sanitation record, and the dishwasher temperature tracking log were incomplete with dates that were missing or not completed. Review of the facility form called Sanitizer Tracking for March 2026 for the three-compartment sink revealed lunch sanitization checks were not completed for 03/02/26, 03/03/36, 03/04/26, 03/05/26, 03/09/26 and dinner sanitization checks were not completed on 03/01/26, 03/04/26, 03/05/26, 03/09/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to preserve the dignity of one resident with a Foley (indwelling) catheter. This affected one resident (Resident #98) of two residents reviewed for dignity with Foley catheters. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary retention, severe sepsis with septic shock, high blood pressure, and congestive heart failure.Observation of Resident #98 on 03/19/26 at 10:01 A.M. revealed the resident was sitting in a wheelchair in a hospital gown. A Foley drainage bag containing urine was hanging from the back of the wheelchair and did not have a privacy cover covering the drainage bag. Interview with Regional Registered Nurse (RRN) #633 at the time of observation stated the resident must be a new admission as the facility went through every resident with a Foley catheter and ensured a privacy bag was in place. Interview with RRN #619 on 03/19/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party was notified of a medication change. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, a urinary tract infection, calculus of the kidney, and osteonecrosis to the left femur from a previous trauma. Review of Resident #4's admission psychiatric evaluation on 03/04/26 by Medical Doctor (MD) #950, the facility's consulting psychiatrist, revealed the resident reported feeling sad and depressed, complaints of not sleeping, feeling anxious and restless as he is not able to do things. MD #950 diagnosed Resident #4 with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and added BuSpar (an antianxiety medication) 10 milligrams (mg) orally twice a day to treat it.Review of the nursing progress notes from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment was maintained for Resident #58. This affected one resident (#58) of 61 residents screened for environmental concerns. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/04/25. Diagnoses include but not limited to the need for personal care, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and repeated falls.Review of Resident #58's care plan dated 01/21/26 revealed the resident had an impaired ability to perform or participate in daily ADL care. Interventions included to assist with toileting if needed and provide incontinence care as needed. Interview and observation on 03/16/2026 at 11:40 A.M. with Resident #58 revealed her bedpan smelled terrible and staff did not clean the bedpan after use. During the interview, two unlabeled and unbagged orange bedpans were observed in the bathroom. One bedpan was inside the toilet bowl and one bedpan was on the floor between the wall and toilet. Both bedpans appeared to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was provided appropriate medical treatment in response to a change in condition. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure appropriate wound care and services were provided to Resident #24 and Resident #95. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained as ordered for Resident #76. This affected four residents (#4, #24, #76, and #95) of 25 residents reviewed for quality of care and treatment. The facility census was 61. Findings include:1.Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, calculus of the kidney and urinary tract infection. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/27/26 for Eliquis (an oral anticoagulant medication) 2.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/28/26 for catheter care twice a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and treatment was provided for Residents #4 and #24's pressure ulcers. This affected two residents (#4 and #24) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 61.Findings Include:1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, a urinary tract infection, calculus of the kidney, and osteonecrosis to the left femur from a previous trauma. Review of the admission Assessment and Baseline Care Plan for Resident, dated 02/27/26 and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #588, revealed the resident did have a wound but the location was not documented. The Baseline Care Plan revealed a care plan for wound care was initiated. Review of the nursing progress notes from 02/27/26 through 03/17/26 revealed no documentation regarding Resident #4 having any wounds. Review of the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, interview, review of facility investigations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure complete and thorough fall investigations were completed for one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/06/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus, abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of contusion of lung, type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and stage III chronic kidney disease.Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #5 was noted to require substantial staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the facility incident log revealed Resident #5 had falls on 12/07/25, 12/27/25, 02/06/26, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based of medical record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure weights and reweights were obtained as required to ensure accuracy. This affected one (Resident #24) of seven reviewed for weights. The facility census was 61.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 11/25/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to infection following a procedure, colostomy, secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, unspecified severe calorie malnutrition, and malignant neoplasm of colon.Review of the 02/19/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #24 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #24 was noted to require set up for eating and was noted to be on a therapeutic diet with desired weight gain.Review of the weights recorded for Resident #24 revealed:On 11/26/25, the resident weighed 132 pounds (lbs) upon admission. On 12/04/25, the resident weighed 142.2 lbs, reflecting a 10.2 lb (7%) gain in one week. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received appropriate care and services to manage the resident's pain. This finding affected one (Resident #4) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, calculus of the kidney, and urinary tract infection.Review of Resident #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/27/26 for Acetaminophen (a mild over-the-counter pain reliever and fever reducer) 325 milligrams (mg) orally every four hours as needed for pain. The medication was discontinued on 03/03/26. Resident #4 also had an order dated 03/03/26 for Oxycodone (a narcotic analgesic) 2.5 mg orally every eight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical record, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were implemented timely. This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 61.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 indicated an admission date of 12/06/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to a displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus, abnormalities of gait and mobility, type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity and chronic kidney disease.Review of the 01/13/26 five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #5 indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #5 was noted to be receiving diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, and antidepressant.Review of the physician order dated 01/27/26 for Resident #5 revealed an order for 25 milligram (mg) capsule of Hydroxyzine Pamoate (a prescription antihistamine used to treat anxiety and itching) 25 milligrams (mg) to be given orally one time per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents medication regimens had an appropriate indication for use. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, a urinary tract infection, calculus of the kidney, and osteonecrosis to the left femur from a previous trauma. Resident #4's medical record did not include diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder, depression, or any psychiatric conditions. Review of Resident #4's progress notes from 02/27/26 through 03/04/26 revealed no indication or record of Resident #4 exhibiting any signs or symptoms of anxiety. There was no documentation of Resident #4 being referred to the facility's psychiatric services. Review of Resident #4's admission psychiatric evaluation on 03/04/26 by Medical Doctor (MD) #950,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less. A total of 26 medications were administered with six errors for a medication error rate of 23.08%. This affected two residents (Residents #27 and #37) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 61.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of Resident #37's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/13/26 for Calcium Citrate (supplement) 250 milligrams (mg) once daily; an order dated 02/17/26 for Glucosamine-Chondroit-Vitamin C-minerals (supplement) 500-400 mg administer 200-250 mg twice daily; an order dated 02/20/26 for Miralax (laxative) 17 grams once daily; an order dated 03/02/26 for Preservision Areds (eye vitamin supplement) 200…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to protect from contamination/spoilage, the oven was maintained in a clean/sanitary manner, and food was prepared/served in accordance with standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 68 out of 69 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Resident #127 was identified as not receiving anything by mouth and received no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Observation during tour of the kitchen on 06/09/25 at 8:10 A.M. with the Dietary Manager revealed in the dry goods storage room there was an open bag of cake mix and an open bag of instant mashed potatoes with no label or date as to when opened. Inside the walk-in freezer there were frozen french toast sticks in a zip lock bag and an opened bag of biscuits with no labels or dates. In the preparation area, the oven had food residue and food splatter on it. Observation on 06/10/25 from 11:30 to 12:53 P.M. during lunch meal service tray line revealed that at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with their preferences during meals. This affected five ( #28, #30, #31, #32, and #40 ) of six residents reviewed for food and drink. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #28 medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anorexia, adult failure to thrive and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #28's care plans revealed an intervention dated 11/25/24 to provide the diet per the physician's order and honor preferences. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #28's physician orders for June 2025 revealed an order for a regular diet, thin liquid consistency. Observation on 06/09/25 at 1:36 P.M. revealed Resident #28's lunch ticket indicated the resident chose apple juice but received cranberry juice. This was verified by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21's left palm protector was implemented as ordered to prevent skin breakdown and prevent deformity. This affected one (Resident #21) of one resident reviewed for position and mobility. Findings Include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, muscle weakness and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #21's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/23/25 for a left palm protector to be placed on in the morning and removed at bedtime and to check skin integrity twice daily. Review of Resident #21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #21's care plans revealed an intervention dated 04/15/25 for a palm protector to the left hand. Review of Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide enteral feeding as ordered for Resident #127. This affected one (#127) of one resident who received enteral feedings. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #127 revealed an admission date of 05/24/25 with diagnoses including dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, aphasia, and gastrostomy status. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 05/31/25, revealed Resident #127 was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for activities of daily living, and received 51 percent or more of calories and 501 milliliter (ml) or more of fluids from tube feeding daily. Review of the physician's orders for June 2025 for Resident #127 identified an order dated 05/27/25 for continuous enteral feeding formula Isosource 1.5 at 55 ml per hour. There were no physician's orders for enteral feeding formula substitutions. Review of the medication administration record for 06/08/25 revealed continuous enteral feeding formula Isosource 1.5 at 55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #34's carbohydrates were monitored during meals, assisted with adding the carbohydrate count to the insulin pump, the resident's care plans were updated to reflect accurate interventions for caring for the resident's insulin pump, the resident's physician orders accurately reflected the amount of as needed insulin to be administered to the resident and the staff were knowledgeable in operating the resident's insulin pump. This resulted in significant insulin medication errors affecting one (Resident #34) of two residents reviewed for insulin administration. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified nondisplaced fracture of the surgical neck of the right humerus, type one diabetes mellitus and spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Review of Resident #34's admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document the details of a fall and fall investigation. This affected one resident (#10) out of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/17/25 and readmission date of 05/13/25 with diagnoses including bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee, atrial fibrillation, difficulty in walking, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, hypertension, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and weakness. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was at low risk for falls with a score of 4.0 (the assessment indicated high risk was a score of 10.0 or higher). Review of the fall investigation report dated 05/20/25 timed 6:00 A.M. indicated Resident #10 had a fall with injury. The question asking Was the patient injured? was answered Other: -states none. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in working order. This affected one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for call light placement. Findings Include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pancytopenia, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic heart disease.Review of Resident #36's admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of a plan of care dated 04/21/25 revealed Resident #36 was at risk for falls. Interventions included to encourage Resident #36 to use call light for transfer/ambulation assistance.Observation and interview on 06/10/25 at 12:57 P.M. revealed Resident #36 needed assistance. Resident #36 stated that he had been using the call light, and it was not working. He stated that he wanted to be positioned for when lunch arrived. An attempt to activate the call light at time of observation/interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on interview, record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review the facility failed to protect Residents #70, #22, #21, #64, #71 from misappropriation of narcotic medication. This affected five residents (#70, #22, #21, #64, #71) of the 29 residents who received narcotic medication. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 04/09/24 and was discharged from the facility on 04/13/24. Medical diagnoses included fracture of the neck of the left femur, aftercare following joint replacement, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #70's physician orders dated 04/09/24 revealed an order to administer Oxycodone Hydrochloride (HCL) 5 milligrams (mg) (opioid pain medication) for severe pain every six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility stock medications, and interview with the staff the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained timely and initiated as ordered for Residents #26, #65, and #57. This affected three residents (#26, #57, and #65) of nine residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included post hemorrhagic anemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, vitamin D deficiency, diabetes, anxiety disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), gout, low back pain, urinary tract infection, acute kidney disease, and osteoarthritis. She discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 had intact cognition. Review of the December 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #65 did not receive her morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure aerosol masks and oxygen tubing were dated as to when they were last changed for Residents #27, #12, #42, #49 and #37, failed to place aerosol mask/mouthpieces in a protective barrier bag for Residents #27, #49 and #37, and failed to ensure the aerosol mask was cleaned for Resident #37. This affected five residents (#27, #12, #42, #49 and #37) of 19 residents with oxygen or aerosol treatments. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis, sepsis, fluid overload, hypertension, acute respiratory failure, bacteremia, traumatic ischemia of the muscles, falls, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition. An observation on 01/25/24 at 9:40 A.M. revealed the oxygen tubing and aerosol mask for Resident #27 were not dated as to when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure urinary drainage bags for Residents #27, #40, and #62 were covered to maintain dignity. This affected three residents (#27, #40, and #62) of nine residents reviewed for dignity and respect. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis, sepsis, fluid overload, hypertension, acute respiratory failure, bacteremia, traumatic ischemia of the muscles, falls, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition and had an indwelling urinary catheter. An observation on 01/25/24 at 9:40 A.M. revealed the urinary drainage bag of Resident #27 was uncovered, and the urine in the bag was visible from the hallway. The drainage bag was secured to the bed frame. On 01/25/2 at 9:46 A.M. an interview with Nurse #100 verified the urinary drainage bag of Resident #27 should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean sanitary environment for Resident #26. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for facility sanitation. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced bimalleolar fracture of the right lower leg, falls, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait, acute respiratory failure, COVID-19, thyrotoxicosis, acute pain due to trauma, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and osteoporosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition. She was dependent on staff for sitting up on the side of the bed and standing. She had not transferred at the time of the assessment. She was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. On 01/25/24 at 1:50 P.M. an interview with Resident #26 revealed when she was readmitted to the facility, she was placed in the room she was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with the staff the facility failed to ensure showers were given to dependent Resident #26. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for showers. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced bimalleolar fracture of the right lower leg, falls, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait, acute respiratory failure, COVID-19, thyrotoxicosis, acute pain due to trauma, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and osteoporosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition. She was dependent on staff for sitting up on the side of the bed and standing and required substantial/maximal assist with bathing/showering. She was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the shower documentation revealed there was no documentation Resident #26 had a bath or shower from 12/27/23 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record and interview with staff the facility failed to timely treat a urinary tract infection for Resident #26 and failed to have a physician's order for indwelling urinary catheters for Residents #27 and #40. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for medications and two residents (#27 and #40) of nine residents reviewed for physician's orders. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced bimalleolar fracture of the right lower leg, falls, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait, acute respiratory failure, COVID-19, thyrotoxicosis, acute pain due to trauma, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and osteoporosis. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #26 had an order for a bladder scan twice daily and to straight catheterize her if the bladder had more than 500 milliliters of urine dated 12/29/23. Review of the admission Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely notify Resident #56's representative of a fall with injury. This affected one (#56) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 59. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including inclusion body myositis, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, anemia, depression, hypertension, pneumonia, constipation, vitamin D deficiency, age related physical debility, anxiety disorder, gastrostomy status, altered mental status, and diabetes mellitus. The resident expired on [DATE]. There was no comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment because Resident #56 was only in the facility for six days prior to his expiration. Review of the assessment titled Clinical admission Documentation 0419, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 was not at high risk for falls. The assessment also indicated there was no baseline care plan for falls. Review of the nurse note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed for two (Residents #162 and #265) of 25 residents whose records were reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #162 revealed an original date of admission of 09/09/23 and a readmission date of 09/30/23. Diagnoses included infection following a procedure, other surgical site, subsequent encounter, altered mental status, unspecified, need for assistance with personal care, enterostomy malfunction, bacteremia, parastomal hernia, anal fistula, unspecified intestinal obstruction, retention of urine, personal history of other malignant neoplasm of rectum, rectosigmoid junction, and anus, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, unspecified cystostomy status, sepsis, unspecified organism, urinary tract infection, site not specified, and malignant neoplasm of lateral wall of bladder. Review of Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility investigation, review of the coroner's investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely assess for injury of Resident #56 after he was found deceased on the floor, failed to timely notify the coroner of a potential head injury for Resident #56 which resulted in a delay of post-mortem evaluation, and failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for Resident #56's fall and death. This affected one (#56) of three residents reviewed for falls and one (#56) of three residents reviewed for death. In addition, the facility failed to ensure transfers were performed according to physician orders, which affected one (#28) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including inclusion body myositis, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, anemia, depression, hypertension, pneumonia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were completed per the facility policy. This finding affected two (Residents #5 and #28) of two residents investigated for dialysis services. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, mixed hyperlipidemia and diabetes. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an order dated 07/20/23 for dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday with pick up time of 10:45 A.M. and chair time of 11:00 A.M. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #5's medical record from 09/01/23 to 10/04/23 did not reveal evidence the resident was assessed on 09/05/23 before or after dialysis, on 09/07/23 after dialysis, on 09/09/23 before or after dialysis, on 09/12/23 before or after dialysis which included a blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate procedures following the fall and subsequent death of Resident #56. This affected one (#56) of three residents reviewed for death. The census was 59. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including inclusion body myositis, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, anemia, depression, hypertension, pneumonia, constipation, vitamin D deficiency, age related physical debility, anxiety disorder, gastrostomy status, altered mental status, and diabetes mellitus. The resident expired on [DATE]. There was no comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment because Resident #56 was only in the facility for six days prior to his expiration. Review of the assessment titled Clinical admission Documentation 0419, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 was not at high risk for falls. The assessment also indicated there was no baseline care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the multi-use glucometer testing (BGT) machine was disinfected and sanitized after use per the facility policy and manufacturer's directions to prevent the risk of cross-contamination of blood-borne pathogens, failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored effectively to prevent the potential for cross contamination of airborne pathogens and failed to ensure appropriate infection control was maintained during Resident #261's tracheostomy care This finding affected one resident (Resident #161) of two residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring, one resident (Residents #13) of four residents investigated for respiratory care and one resident (Resident #261) of one resident investigated for tracheostomy care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #161's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes, anxiety disorder and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #161's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#69) of seven residents reviewed for medications being administered timely. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 06/13/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, depression, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #69 revealed she had orders dated 06/13/23 for Amlodipine 5 milligrams (mg) once daily between 6:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. for hypertension, Duloxetine 60 mg twice daily between 6:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. and between 6:30 P.M. to 10:30 P.M. for depression, Pantoprazole 50 mg twice daily between 6:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. and between 6:30 P.M. to 10:30 P.M. for acid reflux, Pravastatin 50 mg twice daily between 6:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. and between 6:30 P.M. to 10:30 P.M. for high cholesterol, and Toprol XL 25 mg twice daily between 6:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. and between 6:30 P.M. to 10:30 P.M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TSG NURSING CENTERS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2003
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO ANDREW M SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO GERALD F SCHROER JROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO MATTHEW SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 MARGARET S GOODMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
SUSANNE SCHROER DYNASTY TRUST U/AOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2019
THE SCHROER GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/25/2001
MOCK, DOUGLASIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2021
POWELL, LESLIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/15/2015
FILM, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2018
GOODMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2003
LOGAN, JUSTINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2022
NUTTER, ORIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2020
ALTERCARE OF OHIO, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/18/2004

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$894K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 7%Medicare 12%Other / private 81%

This home reported $894K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$391per resident / day
operating cost
$11,892per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366298. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next