No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arbors At Fairlawn The

575 S Cleveland Massillon Road, Fairlawn, OH 44333 · For profit - Corporation · 88 certified beds · (330) 666-5866 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 666-5866 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)3 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3562 Ridge Park Dr · (330) 664-0766 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walmart0.8 mi
3750 W Market St · (330) 666-0742 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.8 mi
120 S Cleveland Massillon Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
461 Trunko Rd · (330) 668-9518 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.1%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.8%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.9%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.7%75.6%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.5–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
46.1%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 80.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-13)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the ambulance run report, review of hospital documents, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #73 was provided a transfer to bed in a safe manner to prevent an incident/accident with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 08/25/24 when Resident #73, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on two staff with maximal assistance needed for transfers, sustained a 10-centimeter laceration that went to the bone with profuse bleeding to her right calf during a staff assisted transfer. As a result of the incident/injury, Resident #73 was emergently transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] for treatment which included 21 sutures to the wound. The resident also exhibited increased pain because of the injury as evidenced by her yelling out following the incident. This affected one resident (Resident #73) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 69.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide care and treatment to ensure one resident (Resident #50) did not develop a pressure injury of the sacrum. Actual harm occurred when Resident #50 developed a Stage 4 (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible on some parts of the wound bed. Epibole [rolled edges], undermining and/or tunneling often occur. Depth varies by anatomical location.) of the sacrum. The facility also failed to ensure pressure injuries of a lower stage did not develop for Resident #47. This affected two of three residents (#47, #50, and #57) reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility identified five resident with pressure ulcers. The census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/12/20. Diagnoses included Stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region , type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #24 during toileting. Actual harm occurred when Resident #24 was left unsupervised in the bathroom, fell and hit her head causing a laceration requiring an emergency room visit and a staple was needed to close her head/scalp laceration. This affected one of six residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lack of coordination, difficulty walking and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated she had severe cognitive impairment and memory impairment. Review of Resident #24's current fall care plan revealed she was high risk for falls related to her confusion, use of psychoactive medications, unsteadiness when walking, incontinence and history of falls. Interventions dated 08/08/17 and 03/05/18 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record reviews and interviews with staff the facility failed to notify Resident #90's physician and daughter of notification of changes. This affected one resident of three reviewed for notifications of change. The census was 80. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #90 revealed an initial admission date of 08/23/24 and re-admission date of 04/05/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, diabetes and congestive heart failure. Resident #90 was discharged on 04/18/25. Review of the profile tab in the electronic medical record revealed Resident #90 was listed first as his own responsible party then his daughter as the second contact. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 was cognitively intact. He was independent with chair to chair transfers. Review of Resident #90's progress note on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #90's safety after not returning timely after a leave of absence (LOA). This affected one resident (Resident #90) of three residents reviewed for LOA's. The census was 80. Findings include: Review of closed medical record for Resident #90 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] and re-admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, diabetes and congestive heart failure. Resident #90 was discharged on [DATE]. Review of the profile tab in the electronic medical record revealed Resident #90 listed first as his own responsible party then his daughter as the second contact. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed the facility would honor Resident #90's preferences including leaving the building unsupervised and traveling throughout the community in his powerchair via public transport. Review of the elopement assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #90 revealed he was not at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure the residents received timely assistance with showers/bathing, incontinence care, dressing, personal hygiene, and changing of soiled sheets. This affected six of six residents (Resident #9, #13, #38, #46, #49, and #56) reviewed for sufficient staffing and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 07/08/24. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required supervision or touch assistants with bathing and tub/shower transfers. Review of the facility tasks revealed Resident #46 preferred showers every Tuesday and Friday. From 02/26/25 through 03/11/25, Resident #46 did not receive or refuse the scheduled shower/bath on 02/28/25 or 03/07/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) received assistance with bathing/showers. This affected four (Resident #9, #13, #38, and #46) of five residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 07/08/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, foot drop right foot, acquired absence of left fingers, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required supervision or touch assistants with bathing and tub/shower transfers. Review of the facility tasks revealed Resident #46 preferred showers every Tuesday and Friday. Record review from 02/26/25 through 03/11/25 of scheduled showers revealed Resident #46 did not receive or refuse the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident with a history of falls and was a fall risk. This affected one (Resident #68) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Record review for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 09/19/19. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety disorder, history of falling, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the census revealed Resident #68 moved from 100 hall to 200 hall on 12/11/24. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #68 used a wheelchair for mobility, required supervision or touching assistance with personal hygiene, transfers, and toilet transfers. Resident #68 had no falls since prior assessment. Review of the care plan for Resident #68 updated 11/13/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents received timely incontinence care. This affected three (Residents #9, #49, and #56) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 01/08/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), obstructive and reflux uropathy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Resident #9 had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Resident #9 used a wheelchair for mobility, required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, partial/moderate assistants for bed mobility, and dependent on staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #74 and resident representatives were properly notified in writing of an emergency discharge for Resident #74. This affected one resident (Resident #74) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the closed record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 10/30/24 with diagnoses including schizoaffective and mood affective disorder, unspecified intellectual disabilities, sexual dysfunction not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety, insomnia, manic episodes, and assistance with personal care. Resident #74 was transferred to the hospital for an acute, inpatient psychiatric stay on 12/09/24 and did not return to the facility. Resident #74 had a legal guardian of person. Review of Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 discharge return not anticipated assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 was modified independent for cognitive daily decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to collaborate with the hospital to ascertain an accurate status of Resident #74's condition before refusing to allow Resident #74 to return to the facility after hospitalization. This affected one resident (Resident #74) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the closed record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 10/30/24 with diagnoses including schizoaffective and mood affective disorder, unspecified intellectual disabilities, sexual dysfunction not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety, insomnia, manic episodes, and assistance with personal care. Resident #74 was transferred to the hospital for an acute, inpatient psychiatric stay on 12/09/24 and did not return to the facility. Resident #74 had a legal guardian of person. Review of Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 discharge return not anticipated assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure all treatments were completed per physician orders for Resident #39. This affected one resident (Resident #39) of four residents reviewed for treatment administration. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 02/24/23 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the skin, hypothyroidism, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and hypertension. Review of Resident #39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #39 required set up help only for eating, partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene, substantial to maximal assistance for toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. Resident #39 was dependent for showers. Review of Resident #39's physician orders dated August 2024, September 2024, and October 2024 revealed orders to cleanse biopsy sites with soap and water,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the security and confidentiality of resident medical records. This affected thirteen (Residents #5, #10, #12, #16, #18, #20 #36,#42 #262, #263, #264, #265 #266) of thirty six sampled residents. The facility census was 59. Findings Include: Observation on 06/10/24 at 5:15 P.M. of the facilities information board on the wall after the main entrance area noted information such as contact information for advocacy agencies (i.e local social security office, local area agency on aging and local ombudsman office), resident rights, state agency contact information and numerous other important information for residents. On the wall was also a plastic file holder. In that filed holder was a file that was easily accessible that contained the following information -Specific information regarding medications taken by Residents #5, #10, #12, #16, #18, #20 #36,#42 #262, #263, #264, #265 #266. -Skilled therapy information for Resident #263. -Information concerning bowel movements for Residents #18 and #42. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate orders and monitoring were in place regarding a urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#112) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #112's record revealed an admission date of 05/22/24 and diagnoses including Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, ulcerative colitis, hypertension, iron deficiency anemia, anxiety, insomnia, constipation, depression and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #112's admission minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #112 was moderately cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #112's current physician's orders revealed there were no orders to change the urinary catheter bag monthly or as needed, to monitor urine from the indwelling catheter or to change the catheter as needed prior to 06/10/24. Interview on 06/10/24 at 10:10 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was dated and monitored for routine replacement. This affected three residents (#19, #35 and #113) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/25/23 and diagnoses including depression, acute and chronic respiratory failure, malignant neoplasm of lower lobe, right bronchus or lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #35's annual minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively intact and used oxygen. Review of Resident #35's physician's orders as of 06/10/24 revealed an order dated 06/25/23 for oxygen at three liters/minute via nasal cannula continuous every day and night shift for COPD. No orders for replacing oxygen tubing on a routine basis were available in the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to monitor residents using anticoagulant and psychotropic medications. This affected one resident (#113) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/24/24 and diagnoses including type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic congestive heart failure, depression, insomnia and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #113's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #113 was cognitively intact and was coded as taking an antidepressant, a hypnotic medication, an anticoagulant, an antibiotic, a diuretic, an opioid and a hypoglycemic medication. Review of Resident #113's physician's orders as of 06/10/24 revealed an order dated 05/24/24 for Eliquis (anticoagulant) oral tablet five milligrams (mg) and an order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility policy and review of guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the facility failed to ensure adequate signage was posted to instruct staff and visitors of proper precautions to take for a resident on enhanced-barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one resident (#112) of three residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #112's record revealed an admission date of 05/22/24 and diagnoses including Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, ulcerative colitis, hypertension, iron deficiency anemia, anxiety, insomnia, constipation, depression and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #112's physician's orders on 06/10/24 revealed an order dated 05/24/24 for enhanced barriers while performing high-contact activity with the resident. No rationale for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) was specified in the order. Observation on 06/10/24 at 9:52 A.M. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, interviews, policy review, and review of the investigation notes for self-reported incident (SRI) #243949 the facility failed to prevent staff to resident abuse. This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 56. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 01/27/24 with diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis (infection of bone) of the left thigh, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, unstageable pressure ulcer, Sjogren syndrome (an immune system illness that mainly causes dry eyes and dry mouth), major depression, and history of respiratory failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had intact cognition and minimal signs of depression. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and nursing unit refrigerator and ensure proper food storage. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen on 08/08/22 from 8:21 A.M. to 8:33 A.M. revealed a large icicle was hanging from the fan unit onto a box of food on a shelf down to a box of buns underneath the fan unit that was sitting on a crate and onto the floor in the walk-in freezer. The walk-in cooler had a slight unpleasant odor and there was a large white bucket of pickles that was uncovered sitting on the top shelf on the left hand side of the cooler. There was food debris on the floor between the oven and steamer and on two light fixtures above the stove were heavily coated in greased dust. The reach-in cooler close to the kitchen door had a large white splatter on the inside bottom. Interview on 08/08/22 between 8:21 A.M. to 8:33 A.M. with [NAME] #164 verified the findings. Observation on 08/09/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was maintained in a clean, sanitary, homelike condition and in good repair. This had the potential to all residents. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Observation on 08/08/22 at 9:40 A.M. of Resident #50 privacy curtain revealed various dried stains. Observation on 08/08/22 at 3:21 P.M. of Residents #52 and #59's room revealed the door of the armoire to the right and the door of the armoire closer to the room door did not stay shut. Resident #52's bedside tray table was in disrepair. The hot water handle in the bathroom was missing and the floor was dirty. The blinds in the window were in disrepair and under the window near the molding, the wall was cracked. Observation and interview on 08/10/22 from 8:27 A.M. to approximately 8:35 A.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #169 of Resident #59's bathroom revealed the floor was dirty. HS #169 verified the observation but stated the dark areas of the floor was floor damage but the dark areas in the entryway of the bathroom was wax…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control and infection prevention guidelines for community equipment. This affected one resident (Resident #3) out of 15 residents (Residents #3, #14, #18, #20, #21, #24, #28, #33, #37, #45, #48, #49, #50, #57) with an active physician order to monitor blood sugar. The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected one resident (Resident #3) and had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility failed to ensure staff donned proper personal protective equipment (PPE). This affected one Resident (Resident #49) and had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/10/22 at 7:40 A.M. of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #135 revealed no hand hygiene was observed after capillary blood draw of Resident #3. LPN #135 removed her protective gloves and proceeded to touch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Residents #47 and #56 were treated with respect by facility staff. This affected two of three residents reviewed for respect and dignity, Resident's #47 and #56. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/15/22 and diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, developmental disorder of scholastic skills, need for assistance with personal care and glaucoma. Review of Resident #56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was unable to complete an interview for cognitive status. Resident #56 required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Review of Resident #56's care plan dated, 07/16/22 included Resident #56 had impaired cognitive function, dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia, developmentally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #211 transfer notice contained the accurate state's information under the appeal rights. This affected one resident (#211) of two residents (#210 and #211) reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #211 revealed an admission date of 06/09/22 and a discharge date of 06/20/22. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity, secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, Alzheimer's disease, stage two pressure ulcer on the sacral region, and an unstageable ulcer on the right hip. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #211 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, total dependence of two staff for transfers, and total dependence of one staff for toilet use. Review of the nurses' notes dated 06/20/22 timed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was provided to Resident #211 upon hospitalization. This affected one resident (#211) of two residents (#210 and #211) reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #211 revealed an admission date of 06/09/22 and a discharge date of 06/20/22. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity, secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, Alzheimer's disease, stage two pressure ulcer on the sacral region, and an unstageable ulcer on the right hip. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #211 had a severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, total dependence of two staff for transfers, and total dependence of one staff for toilet use. Review of the nurses' notes dated 06/20/22 timed 1:07 P.M. revealed therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, review of manufacturer instructions, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for Resident #24, ensure Resident #210 was provided appropriate assistance with bed mobility during incontinence care, and ensure vaping supplies were kept secured. This affected one resident (Resident #24) of 16 residents (Resident #1, #3, #4, #11, #13, #19, #22, #26, #41, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, and #58) reviewed who required a mechanical lift for transfers, one resident (Resident #210) out of three residents reviewed for falls, and one resident (Resident #28) out of nine residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 03/29/21 and a readmission date of 10/26/21. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, paraplegia (paralysis in the lower half of the body), chronic pain, morbid obesity, heart disease, Covid-19, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #300) known for wandering did not walk out of the facility unaccompanied by a staff member. This affected one resident (Resident #300) out of six residents (Resident's #5, #6, #7, #17, #21, #23) reviewed who were at risk for elopement. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of Resident #300 medical record revealed an admission date of 12/21/21 and diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, atrial fibrillation, and unsteadiness on feet. Resident #300 was transferred to a sister facility with a secured unit on 06/09/22. Review of Resident #300's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #300 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person for locomotion on the nursing unit. Further review revealed Resident #300 was not steady when walking but able to stabilize without staff assistance. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antipsychotic as needed medication was not ordered beyond 14 days without first re-evaluating the resident, and ensure all psychotropic medications were reviewed to ensure the appropriateness of their use. This affected one resident (Resident #44) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Record review on 08/09/22 of Resident #44 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including pathological fracture in neoplastic disease, right femur; malignant neoplasm of colon, liver and interscholastic bile duct; anxiety disorder; major depressive disorder, and retention of urine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had intact cognition. Review of physician orders for June, July and August 2022 revealed Resident #44 was ordered the antipsychotic medication Prochlorperazine Maleate (Prochlorperazine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, store and distribute food in a sanitary kitchen environment. This affected 80 of 81 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified Resident #52 as not receiving food by mouth. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 08/12/19 from 8:30 A.M. to 8:53 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #600 revealed in the walk-in cooler, three of the five blower fans were coated in dust. In the dry storage room, one box of cornbread was noted to be dated 09/24/18. Observation of the hood over the flat-top grill revealed a sticker indicating the hood had last been cleaned on 02/28/19 and a cobweb was noted on the right-most light over the hood. In the dish room, the log to left of the high-temperature dish machine to record dishwasher temperatures was incomplete. Observation of a dishmachine temperature log for August 2019 revealed there were spaces for staff to document temperatures three times daily. There were only breakfast temperatures recorded on 08/01/19, 08/02/19, 08/03/19, 08/04/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and menu spreadsheet review the facility failed to ensure meals were provided as planned on the menus. This affected three residents (Resident #43, Resident #62 and Resident #85) of three residents on a pureed diet and one resident (Resident #6) of one resident on a level-II mechanically altered diet. The facility census was 81 residents. Findings include: Review of the spreadsheet titled, Week 4, Day 3 corresponding to 08/13/19 revealed residents receiving a pureed diet were to receive a #12-scoop of pureed pork, a #8-scoop of pureed potatoes, a #16-scoop of pureed cauliflower, a #16-scoop of pureed bread and a #10-scoop of pureed peanut butter brownie. The spreadsheet indicated residents receiving a level-II mechanically altered diet were to receive ground garlic pork, soft mashed potatoes, soft mashed cauliflower, a #16-scoop of pureed bread and a #10-scoop of pureed peanut butter brownie. The level-II mechanically altered diet consisted of moist and soft foods; meats were to be minced and moistened with sauces or gravies. Observation of lunch tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain clean, functional and sanitary shower rooms. This affected Resident #41, Resident #56 and Resident #61 and affected four of four facility shower rooms, which had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility, except for 13 residents receiving only bed baths (Residents #8, 9, 15, 29, 35, 40, 43, 48, 50, 52, 62, 70 and 80). Findings include: On 08/12/19 at 10:10 A.M. interview with Resident #41 revealed the 200 hall shower room fan was not functioning and had not been since their admission [DATE]). Resident #41 indicated the shower room gets so hot it is difficult to breath and the nurse aides almost pass out from the heat. Observation on 08/12/19 at 10:20 A.M. in the room of Resident #56 and Resident #61 revealed significant chipped paint, scrapes and scuff marks on the walls by both resident's beds. A large unpainted patched hole was noted on the wall next to the window. An interview with Housekeeper #615 at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of abnormal glucose levels for Resident #33. This affected one of five residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: Review of the record of Resident #33 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. Review of her care plan for diabetes mellitus dated 01/13/16 and updated through 10/21/19 revealed interventions to include administration of diabetes medications as ordered, fasting serum blood sugar as ordered by physician, and for staff to monitor/document/report to the physician as needed any signs or symptoms of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. Review of Resident #33's current physician orders revealed an order for Lantus insulin (a long acting insulin to treat high blood sugar) to be administered twice a day, and for a routine dose of Novolog insulin, 21 units, to be given three times a day with meals. She also had an order dated 08/31/18 for Novolog insulin (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment to Resident #52's pressure ulcer per the physician orders. This affected one of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) of the vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, dementia without behavioral disturbance, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the right dominant side. Review of Resident #52's physician orders revealed an order dated 07/22/19 for nursing staff to gently cleanse the wound and wound bed with normal saline, pat dry, lightly pack wound with Dakin's solution soaked gauze, and cover with an adhesive foam dressing twice daily and as needed. Review of Resident #52's pressure ulcer wound grid dated 08/08/19 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #52's medical record contained a physician order for oxygen therapy. This affected one of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, dementia without behavioral disturbance, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the right dominant side. Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #52's current respiratory care plan revealed an intervention dated 06/13/19 for oxygen settings via nasal cannula as ordered by the physician. Review of Resident #52's medical record did not reveal a physician order for oxygen therapy. Observations at 08/12/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #50's medications and renal diet were provided as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/07/18 with diagnoses including obesity, anemia, end stage renal (kidney) disease with dependence on dialysis, diabetes, and hypotension (low blood pressure). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was alert and oriented with intact cognition and rejected care one to three days in the seven day review period. Review of a care plan dated 05/16/18 revealed Resident #50 received dialysis treatments on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Review of Resident #50's current physician orders revealed an order dated 08/08/19 directing staff to send all morning and afternoon medications to dialysis with the resident every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility error rate was 18.51%, with 5 errors in 27 opportunities. This affected two of four residents observed for medication pass (Resident #'s 2 and 52). Findings include: 1. Review of the record of Resident #2 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including myasthenia gravis, gastroesophageal reflux disease and iron deficiency. An observation of medication pass for Resident #2 was made on [DATE] at 8:25 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse LPN #613. LPN #613 could not find the correct dose of Ferrous Gluconate (an iron supplement, ordered [DATE]), so LPN # 611, who was nearby, found a box of the medication for LPN #613. LPN #613 popped a tablet into the cup for the resident from a blister sealed package that was in a box. The package and the blister package all were marked with an expiration date of 02/19, (February 2019). LPN #613 then individually put all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #50's medications were appropriately stored and labeled. This affected one resident of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/07/18 with diagnoses including obesity, anemia, end stage renal (kidney) disease with dependence on dialysis, diabetes, and hypotension (low blood pressure). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was alert and oriented with intact cognition. Review of a care plan dated 05/16/18 revealed Resident #50 received dialysis treatments on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Interview with Resident #50 on 08/14/19 at 8:34 A.M. revealed the facility recently started sending medications with him to dialysis. Resident #50 stated he received medications when he returned to the facility after dialysis treatments and stated the dialysis center did not administer medications. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2016
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
NOBLE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$419K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 4%Other / private 77%

This home reported $419K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$332per resident / day
operating cost
$10,092per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$265per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365689. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next