Arbors At Minerva

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 72.9 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, emergency medical services (EMS) run report review, death certificate review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor and provide timely and necessary care and treatment following a change in condition for Resident #1. This affected one (Resident#1) of three reviewed for change in condition. Actual Harm occurred on 12/27/24 at 1:48 A.M. when Resident #1 (who had previously been medicated for nausea/vomiting on 12/26/24 at 3:56 P.M. and 10:38 P.M.) vomited brown-colored emesis and had a decline in her baseline vital signs. The resident's blood pressure was 94/52 millimeters of Mercury (mm/Hg) (normal blood pressure is 120/60 mm/Hg), heart rate was 120 beats per minute (normal is 60-90), temperature was 99.4 Fahrenheit (F), and oxygen saturation was 90% on room air (normal is 92% or higher on room air). Resident #1 complained of aching all over and was given Tylenol (analgesic and fever reducer) 325 milligrams (mg) two tablets. On 12/27/24 at 4:49 A.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from staff to resident verbal, physical, and sexual abuse. This affected two residents (#35 and #50) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Actual Psychosocial Harm occurred in August 2023 (exact date unknown) to Resident #35 when State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #76 told him to scoot your fat a$$ back in the chair, move your fu### legs. Resident #35 was upset. Additionally, on another occasion, date unknown, STNA #76 flung Resident #35's legs into the bed. STNA #76 stretched his legs out and flung them in the bed. Resident #35 told STNA #76 it hurt when she did that. On 08/17/23 Resident #35 remained visibly upset raising his voice when he was describing the actions of STNA #76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/20 with admission diagnoses that included impulse disorder, shizoaffective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate assistance, including appropriate lower extremity support during transport of Resident #3 (with hemiparesis/hemiplegia to the right side) in a wheelchair. This affected one resident (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for a fall with major injury. The facility census was 70. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #3 on 02/20/23 when staff failed to provide adequate lower extremity support to the resident during transport resulting in the resident's leg dragging on the floor and the resident falling from the wheelchair and suffering a right clavicle fracture and proximal humeral fracture. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness) affecting the right side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic embolism and thrombosis, spinal stenosis, osteoporosis, long term use of anticoagulants, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were followed for Resident #2 and failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during catheter care for Resident #2 and #76. This affected one resident (Residents #2) out of five residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions and two (Residents #2 and #76) out of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 74.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/16/26 with diagnoses including sepsis, the presence of right artificial hip joint, need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Discharge summary dated [DATE] from the hospital for Resident #14 revealed she had diagnoses of sepsis and acute on chronic right hip periprosthetic methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) wound infection status post revision of total hip arthroplasty and debridement. Review of the care plan dated 01/16/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician notification occurred with a change in resident condition . This affected one (Resident#1) of three reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, morbid obesity, obstructive hydrocephalus, presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, major depressive disorder, and abnormal posture. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had intact cognition. The resident required physical assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the nursing progress note dated 12/25/24 at 11:30 A.M. revealed the resident received Zofran 4 mg (ordered 11/04/24) by mouth for nausea and vomiting. The administration was listed as effective. Review of the nursing progress note dated 12/26/24 at 8:55 A.M. revealed Resident #1 had frequent episodes of emesis for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on employee file review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) had evaluations completed as required. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the employee file for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #274 revealed a hire date of 06/14/23. No annual performance evaluation was found. Review of the employee file for STNA #219 revealed a hire date of 08/17/22. No annual performance evaluation was found. Review of the employee file for STNA #501 revealed a hire date of 02/2024. A 90-day performance evaluation was not found. Interview on 08/22/24 at 12:30 P.M. the facility Administrator verified the evaluations for STNAs #274, STNA #219, and STNA #501 were not completed. Review of the facility policy Performance Appraisals dated 01/01/22 revealed it is the facility policy to evaluate performance of employees at least annually.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were in place, indwelling catheters were not dragging on the floor, handwashing met professional standards and tuberculin testing of staff was conducted on hire and annually. This affected Resident's #35 and #51 and had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/10/21 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, generalized anxiety, cognitive communication disorder, depression, need for assistance with personal care, metabolic encephalopathy, gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, nicotine dependence, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, fractured femur, obstructive and reflux uropathy, anemia, hypertension, acquired absence of left great toe, acute respiratory failure, anemia, acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This affected five (Resident's #4, #35, #37, #42, and #49) of 19 records reviewed. The census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/22/24 with diagnoses including dysphagia, palliative care, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, transient cerebral ischemic attack, and hypertension. Interview 08/19/24 at 01:59 P.M. with the resident's wife included her husband does not get out of bed. He doesn't watch television and isn't interested in a whole lot. Activities does not come in and interact with him. Review of the monthly calendar for August 2024 revealed the resident had on the television/movie in room, radio, reminisce, conversation, sermon on in room on television on Sundays. There were up to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean environment. This affected residents but had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 69. Findings include: On 08/22/24 fro 9:00 A.M. through 9:20 A.M. the following observations were made: 1. Torn wallpaper border was noted between resident rooms, above the medical and storage room on the 100 hall; 300 hall resident rooms as well as above the 300 hall shower room and nurses' station; and 400 hall resident rooms. 2. Black marks from adhesive tape where noted on the ceiling near Resident #20's room and the ceiling above the medical and storage rooms on 100/200 halls. 3. Repaired drywall with unfinished/untextured drywall compound was observed outside the women's bathroom in the front lobby, inside and outside the private dining room, at the 300/400 nurses' station and fire doors, 100/200 hall nurses' station and fire doors. 4. Scraped and damaged drywall from resident beds was noted in the following resident rooms: Resident #7, Resident #20, Resident #33, Resident #42,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility to maintain privacy during Resident 7's wound care and failed provide a covering to prevent Resident #51's urine from being visible related to his catheter. This affected two residents (#7 and #51) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 04/21/17. Diagnoses included spina bifida, paraplegia, and stage three pressure ulcers to the resident's right and left ischial tuberosity. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had two stage three pressure areas. Observation on 08/21/24 at 1:06 P.M. through 1:20 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #216 and State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #502 entered Resident #7's room to complete wound care. LPN #216 left the resident's door open and pulled the treatment cart up to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the use of a geri chair was appropriate and not considered a restraint. This affected one (Resident #58) of one residents reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Observation of Resident #58 throughout the annual survey from 08/19/24 to 08/22/24 revealed the resident seated in a reclined geri chair (comfortable and supportive wheeled seating solution beyond typical wheelchairs and recliners). Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/20/23 with diagnosis that included cerebrovascular accident with hemiplegia, prostate cancer and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment with a reference date of 07/24/24 indicated the resident had a severely impaired cognition level and indicated no restraint use in place for the resident. Review of the resident assessments found no evidence of any type of assessment for the use of the geri chair to determine if the resident was able…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide comprehensive, resident centered activities for dependent residents. This affected two (Resident's #35 and #42) of three residents reviewed for activities. The census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/22/24 with diagnoses including palliative care, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, depression, and weakness. Review of an Activities Evaluation dated 06/24/24 revealed he finds strength in faith/religion, gardening/outdoors, movies/television, music/talk radio, pet visits, religious activities, and beauty and barber. Prefers activities in his room in the afternoon and evenings and 1:1 activities. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, no behaviors, has little interest or pleasure in doing things, feeling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure preventative skin care was provided to residents with pressure ulcers. This affected one (Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/22/24 with diagnoses including palliative care, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, depression, weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, transient cerebral ischemic attack, and hypertension. Review of a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 06/23/24 revealed the resident had no sensory impairment, skin was occasionally moist, walks occasionally, very limited mobility, probably inadequate nutrition, potential problem with shear and friction, and was identified at risk for pressure ulcer development. Review of a resident plan of care for at Risk for Impaired Skin Integrity related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $519K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH