Arbors At Mifflin

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or call 911 for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for Resident #69, who was found unresponsive, without a pulse/heartbeat and was identified as a full code status. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death when Resident #69 did not receive CPR and EMS was not contacted for medical services assistance. Resident #69 subsequently expired. This affected one resident (Resident #69) of three (#69, #70, and #71) residents reviewed for death in the facility. The facility census was 68 residents. On [DATE] at 2:26 P.M., the Administrator and Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #181 were notified Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at approximately 5:30 A.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were administered as ordered and the physician was notified when the antibiotics were not available for administration. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #25) out of two residents reviewed for antibiotic medication orders. The facility's census was 87. Findings Include: A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed admission date 10/03/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to urinary tract infection (UTI), infection of prosthetic hip joint, osteoarthritis, and major depression disorder. Resident #25 required assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily (ADL) tasks including transfers by a mechanical lift. Resident #25 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 dated 10/10/24. A review of Resident #25's physician orders revealed an ordered dated 11/13/24 for an antibiotic Doxycycline Hyclate capsule 100 milligrams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to datemark potentially hazardous food items in the walk-in cooler and maintain kitchen utensils in a safe and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility and receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Observations of the kitchen on 05/19/24 at 8:30 A.M. to 8:37 A.M. with Dietary Manager #113 revealed in the walk-in cooler, there were two blocks of sliced orange cheese stored undated, an open block of ham was stored undated, an open block of turkey breast was stored undated, an open pork loin was stored undated, and a large box of colored eggs with a label of activities was stored undated. Interview with Dietary Manager #113 confirmed the cheese, the ham, the turkey breast meat, the pork loin were not dated. Dietary Manager #113 stated the pork loin was was cut Friday night and the colored eggs were from Easter (03/31/24). Review of the facilities Food Storage: Cold Foods policy dated 02/2023 revealed all foods will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, review of facility admission packet, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's advance directives were clearly identified in their medical record. This affected two (Residents #36 and #129) of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's electronic medical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included obstructive uropathy, malnutrition, and chronic kidney disease. The physician orders in the electronic record revealed Resident #36 was a Full code. Review of Resident #36's paper chart revealed there were two different advanced directive forms in a plastic sleeve in the front of the chart. There was a Full code document and also a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) document, that were not dated. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on [DATE] at 11:00 A.M. confirmed Resident #36's advanced directives were not clearly identified in the medical record.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interview, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) for Resident #48 and the SNFABN and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was not filled out correctly for Resident #16. This affected two (Residents #16 and #48) of two residents reviewed for discharged from skilled therapy but remained in the facility. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #16 was receiving skilled services under Medicare part A from 01/11/24 to 02/10/24. Resident #16's record revealed Resident #16 remained in the facility. Review of Resident #16's SNFABN form/Form-CMS 10055, dated revealed the estimated cost category was monthly patient liability and did not include a dollar amount on the form. Review of Resident #16's NOMNC form/CMS-10123…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had physician orders for oxygen use and failed to safely store the resident's oxygen. This affected three (Residents #17, #41, and #69) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 23 resident who utilized supplemental oxygen. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 06/15/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/30/24, revealed Resident #17 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #17 required the use of supplemental oxygen and had shortness of breath while lying flat. Review of Resident #17's physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/08/24 for continuous supplemental oxygen at two to eight liters per minute (LPM) per nasal cannula. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was free from a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #16) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 04/11/14. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment, dated 03/01/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #16 was noted to have hallucinations and delusions and was not noted to reject any care or treatment. Resident #16 was noted to receive antipsychotic medications on a daily basis and a gradual dose reduction had been documented as clinically contraindicated. Review of Resident #16's physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/11/24 for Loxapine (an antipsychotic medication) 50 milligrams (mg) give three capsules daily at bedtime. Resident #16 also had an order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the menu and give residents the appropriate food. This affected three (Residents #28, #39, and #134) of six residents who had their meals and meal tickets reviewed. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #28's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/06/22 for a regular diet with regular texture and regular fluid with thin consistency. Review of Resident #28's lunch meal ticket dated 05/19/24 Sunday lunch, indicated the meal included a half cup of marinated cucumber salad. Observation on 05/19/24 at 11:45 A.M. revealed Resident #28's lunch was missing the marinated cucumber salad. Interview on 05/19/24 at 11:51 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #67 confirmed Resident #28…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transmission based precautions (TBP) were implemented for Resident #36. This affected one (Resident #36) of one resident reviewed for transmission based precautions. The facility identified only one resident on transmission based precautions. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 12/02/21. Medical diagnoses included enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/15/24, revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed. Resident #36 was not recorded as having any behaviors or rejection of care. The resident was noted to be dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of Resident #36's physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/19/24 for contact precautions related to clostridium difficile…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraint. This affected one resident (#68) of one resident reviewed for a physical restraint. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, malignant neoplasm of the colon, personal history of transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pain, and anorexia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was severely cognitively impaired, had physical behaviors, verbal behaviors and rejection of care one to three days of the review period. The resident required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #68 utilized a walker and a wheelchair for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance was provided with nail care. This affected one resident (#57) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living care. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed admission date of 10/01/19. Diagnoses included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, left sided hemiplegia, contractures of right knee and hip, contractures of left hand, elbow, wrist, forearm, shoulder, hip, and knee, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had intact cognition and required extensive two staff assistance with personal hygiene and dependent on two staff assistance for bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 07/26/22 revealed Resident #57 refused care at times and preferred certain staff to care for him. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $604K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH