No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arbors At Marietta

400 Seventh Street, Marietta, OH 45750 · For profit - Corporation · 133 certified beds · (740) 373-3597 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 373-3597 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$79,853 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $79,853 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
408 3rd St · (740) 373-5119 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy0.2 mi
128 Gross Street, Frontier Shopping Center
Grocery
128 Gross St · (740) 373-5567 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N 7th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%30.1%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.7%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication41.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.5%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.2%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.3%12.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.921.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.811.801.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
34.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 34.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 44.0–65.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.6–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge34.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge24.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge20.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting81.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.3–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
47.2%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 125.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.65 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-25)
31
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

80 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 67 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident safety during facility provided transportation to prevent injury. In addition, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for residents at risk for falls. This affected two residents (#1 and #15) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 117. Actual Harm occurred on 10/27/25 when Resident #1, a resident dependent on staff for transportation, was on her way back to the facility from an appointment at a local hospital when Transport Aide (TA) #118 failed to ensure the wheel straps on the left side of Resident #1's wheelchair were secured appropriately. This resulted in Resident #1 being dislodged from her wheelchair as the bus turned, falling and hitting her head. Resident #1 was transported to the local hospital emergency room where she required medical treatment including 10 staples to a head laceration. Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews, policy review, mechanical lift user manual review, and review of fall assessments, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance, supervision and/or interventions to prevent resident falls. The facility also failed to develop and implement adequate safety interventions for resident smoking to prevent accidents/injury. This affected five residents (#24, #42, #47, #70, and #80) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Actual psychosocial and physical harm occurred on 12/27/23 during a staff assisted transfer using a mechanical lift for Resident #47 resulting in a fall. During the transfer facility staff failed to provide a safe, clear, environment resulting in the lift becoming stuck under the resident's wheelchair. Staff pulled the mechanical lift in an effort to release it from under the wheelchair causing Resident #47 to bounce in the mechanical lift which then leaned too far to the left, tipping over and Resident #47 made contact with her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI) and the facility related investigation, review of controlled drug record/disposition forms and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #86 was provided an adequate and effective pain management program, including the administration of as needed (PRN) narcotic pain medication as requested and to meet the resident's pain and total care needs. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 10/11/22 when Resident #86 requested the ordered narcotic pain medication (Percocet) but was administered Colace (a stool softener) in place of the medication resulting in the resident having increased bowel movements during the night, increased pain and an inability to sleep. Subsequent requests by the resident for the Percocet from the same nurse (Registered Nurse (RN)) #125 resulted in additional doses of Colace being administered and not the Percocet as ordered resulting in unrelieved pain for the resident. This affected one resident (#86) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident assessment was completed that accurately reflected the resident's status at the time of the assessment. This affected one resident (#102) of three sampled for Minimum Data Set (MDS) accuracy. The facility census was 122.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 01/15/26 diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on respirator (ventilator), Parkinson's disease, anemia, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, contracture of muscle, right lower leg, left lower leg, right upper arm and left upper arm, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #102's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/26, revealed Resident #102 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #102 was dependent on facility staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs)and indicated the resident had no impairments to her range of motion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person centered care plan that met the resident's medical and physical care needs related to contractures and failed to implement the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan as it was written when providing care to the resident. this affected on e resident (#102) of three sampled for care planning. The facility census was 122.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 01/15/26 diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on respirator (ventilator), Parkinson's disease, anemia, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, contracture of muscle, right lower leg, left lower leg, right upper arm and left upper arm, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #102's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/26, revealed Resident #102 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #102 was dependent on facility staff for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's cycle menus, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were provided as per the menu and all substitutions of the meal that deviated from the planned menu were recorded and kept on record as required. This had the potential to affect all but 11 residents (#25, #26, #54, #55, #57, #58, #65, #66, #68, #119, and #127), who the facility identified as being on nothing by mouth (NPO) diets, and did not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility's census was 127. Findings include: Review of the facility's cycle menu for Week #1 of 2025- 2026 revealed the lunch menu for Wednesday 02/11/26 was to be cranberry orange chicken, roasted Brussels sprouts, garlic and rosemary roasted red skin potatoes, dinner roll, and Mandarin oranges. The alternate for that meal was cheese ravioli with marinara sauce and a tossed salad with dressing. The menu included a message that indicated meals were subject to change without notice due to product availability. On 02/11/26 at 11:21 A.M., a visit was made to the facility's kitchen for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a possible situation of neglect was reported to the State survey agency, as required, when a resident choked during a meal resulting in the resident's death. This affected one resident (#128) of two residents reviewed for death. Findings include:Review of Resident #128's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a malignant neoplasm of the prostate and obesity. Review of Resident #128's advanced directives revealed the resident's code status was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (full treatment provided, including resuscitation efforts, until the resident experienced cardiac or respiratory arrest, when all life-saving interventions stop). The advanced directive had been signed into place by an advanced level provider on [DATE]. Review of Resident #128's physician's orders revealed he was to receive a regular diet, with regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the shower room and resident rooms in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected one (#43) of two residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 124. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. Review of an admission minimum data set (MDS) completed on 03/27/25 revealed Resident #43's cognition remained intact. Interview on 04/21/25 at 3:07 P.M. with Resident #43 revealed sometimes the shower rooms are not cleaned well, and she had a stain on her shower curtain since her admission. Interview and tour on 04/23/25 at 4:01 P.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #201 and Maintenance Staff (MS) #567 revealed the first-floor shower room had a quarter-sized, soft bowel movement on the floor next to the drain in the third stall, and a used washcloth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure minimum data set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for falls, dental status, catheter and continence status. This affected three (#86, #104, and #178) of four residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #178 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including occlusion and stenosis of right carotid artery, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of a nursing note dated 04/01/25 at 1:00 P.M. by Unit Manager (UM) #595 revealed Resident #178 admitted to the facility with a #16 French (the size of the catheter) indwelling catheter for urinary retention. Review of a Urinary Continence Evaluation dated 04/08/25 at 4:47 P.M. revealed Resident #178 was always continent and did not have a urinary catheter in use. Review of an admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #178's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Record review revealed Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, tracheostomy status, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Interview and observation on 04/21/25 at 1:28 P.M. with Resident #104 revealed the resident had broken and missing teeth due to history of drug use. Review of Resident #104's current plan of care did not address oral/dental status. Interview on 04/22/25 at 2:33 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #592 confirmed staff provide oral care for Resident #104 and the resident has several missing and broken teeth but does not complain of pain during care. Interview on 04/22/25 at 2:38 P.M. with MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #564 confirmed there was no care plan to address oral/dental status. Review of a policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 06/30/22 revealed the facility is to develop and implement a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, medical record review and missing items log review, the facility failed to ensure missing hearing aides were reported to the appropriate staff and failed to ensure hearing aides were worn as directed to aide in communication. This affected one (Resident #32) of one resident reviewed for vision/hearing. The census was 124. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #32 admitted to the facility 09/04/23 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, diastolic heart failure, congestive heart failure, hearing loss. Review of Resident #32 care plan completed 08/16/23 and revised 02/10/24 revealed Resident is at risk for impaired communication related to being hard of hearing. Goals include Resident#32 will understand others when communicating through next review. Interventions include Allow ample time for the resident to comprehend what is being communicated and allow time for response, Audiology referral as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a comprehensive treatment plan for altered skin integrity to Resident #48. This affected one resident (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for non pressure skin conditions. The facility census was 124. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 11/05/20 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, diabetes mellitus type two, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Review of the plan of care revised on 03/11/25 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for skin impairment with interventions in place to decrease risk. The plan of care did not include interventions for bilateral lower extremities discoloration and dry skin. Review of the Medicare five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Resident #48 was dependent on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received comprehensive and resident centered care related to indwelling urinary catheters. This affected two residents (#28 and #178) of three sampled for catheters. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/02/18, a re-entry date of 05/21/18 and diagnoses including diabetes, anemia, neurogenic bladder, dementia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact, used an indwelling catheter to empty her bladder and had a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. An observation of Resident #28 on 04/21/25 at 10:45 A.M. revealed the resident to have a catheter and the catheter bag to be hanging on the positioning rail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 67 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff planned to administer the appropriate dose of medication, without resident intervention, to prevent a potential overdose. This affected one resident (Resident #104) of one residents reviewed for a medication error. The census was 124. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and tracheostomy status. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #104 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Record review revealed on 12/24/24 an order was received for Methadone 10 milligrams (mg): Give two tablets by mouth three times a day However the order was discontinued on 12/24/24. On 12/26/24, an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a potential medication error and the disposition of controlled medications. This affected one resident (#104) of one residents reviewed for a medication error. The facility census was 124. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and tracheostomy status. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #104 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Record review revealed on 12/24/24 an order was received for Methadone 10 milligrams (mg): Give two tablets by mouth three times a day However the order was discontinued on 12/24/24. On 12/26/24, an order for Methadone 10 mg give two tablets via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility alternative dispute resolution agreements, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents understood the agreement they signed. This affected three of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements (Residents #31, #89, and #178). The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/20/25. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 01/27/25 and 03/06/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of a facility Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement dated 01/20/25 revealed Resident #31 electronically signed the agreement on 01/23/25. The agreement stated it demonstrated a mutual intention to resolve disputes between them outside of court and to submit their disputes to Alternative Dispute Resolution through mediation and/or arbitration. The form also stated that the resident had been offered to, or had been able to view an audio/visual recorded video that details this agreement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration and to maintain contact isolation precautions while in a resident's room with clostridium difficile. This affected two residents (#104 and #178) of five sampled for infection control. The facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/24 and diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, chronic pancreatitis, anemia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food or vomit, tracheostomy status, and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #104's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Further review revealed the resident was receiving enteral feedings via a gastrostomy tube. Review of Resident #104's orders revealed an order for the resident to be on enhanced barrier precautions (due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility self-reported incident (SRI) including investigation, observations, staff and resident interviews and review of facility Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation policy, the facility failed to ensure residents was free from physical and sexual abuse. This affected two residents (#57, #61) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility in-house census was 110. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure peripheral vascular disease, anemia, and mental disorder. Review of Resident #61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact and he had one to three days of other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others. Review of Resident #61's orders and medication administration records dated 02/2024 revealed on 02/08/24 new orders were added to have two staff with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner and failed to ensure food preparation equipment was clean. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Six residents (#1, #23, #28, #29, #39, and #198) received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the facility kitchen. The facility also failed to ensure two residents (#32 and #62)'s personal refrigerators were kept clean and at an appropriate temperature and failed to ensure four residents (#10, #33, #62, and #81)'s personal refrigerator temperatures were logged for safety. The facility census was 97. Findings included: 1. Observation on 01/02/24 at 8:09 A.M. revealed the onion powder and ground cinnamon containers were not closed properly. Observation on 01/03/24 at 9:15 A.M. revealed the onion powder, ground cinnamon, garlic powder, and lemon pepper seasoning salt containers were not closed properly. Interview on 01/03/24 at 10:10 A.M. with [NAME] #192 verified the spice container noted above were open,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This had the potential to affect all 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 01/02/24 at 9:20 A.M. of the facility dumpster/compactor revealed trash on the ground around the dumpster/compactor. The trash included milk cartons, straws, lids, rubber gloves and a used depends. Interview on 01/02/24 at 9:22 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #131 verified the debris on the ground around the dumpster/compactor and that it should not be there. Review of the facility policy titled, Environment, (revised 09/2017), revealed all trash will be properly disposed of in external receptacles (dumpsters) and the surrounding area will be free of debris. Review of the facility policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, (reviewed/revised 01/01/22), revealed refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Surrounding area shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident showing signs of Covid-19 was promptly identified, tested, and placed in transmission based precautions (TBP's) for Covid-19 when symptoms originated, failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a room of another resident who was on TBP's for being positive for Covid-19, failed to timely identify and place a third resident in TBP's who had a multi-drug resistant organism in his urine, and failed to ensure sharps (syringes and vacutainers needles) were properly disposed of inside of sharps containers so the needles could not be easily retrieved. This affected three residents (#21, #72, and #82) of three residents reviewed for infections (two for Covid-19 and one for urinary tract infections) and had the potential to review all residents that resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #21's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the noise levels were not too loud for Resident #82 and failed to ensure the walls were in good repair for Resident #46, #60, and #192. This affected four residents (Resident #82, #46, #60, #192) of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Observation on 01/02/24 at 10:21 A.M. revealed the wall in Resident #46's room had a eight-inch area of wall which had been patched but not painted. Interview on 01/02/24 at 3:09 P.M. with Resident #82 revealed the facility is too loud because another resident keeps a television turned up and Resident #82 has sensitive hearing. Resident #82 stated she could not keep her door closed, and the other resident did not have to turn the television down and declined to wear hearing aids. Observation on 01/03/24 at 8:46 A.M. revealed a ceiling at the foot of Resident #192's bed by the window had a brown-stained tile and there were four quarter-sized holes in the wall in the middle of the room. During a tour with Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of medication error reports, review of staff education reports, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents only received medications ordered and intended for them, medications were administered in accordance with professional standards, and medications were administered within appropriate time frames set forth by the physician's orders. This affected 11 residents (#12, #17, #38, #46, #54, #60, #63, #64, #70, #191, and #192) who were identified from a review of one medication error report. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #38's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified dementia, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and hyperlipidemia. A review of Resident #38's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Atorvastatin 40 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) at bedtime (hs) for hyperlipidemia. His orders included some psychotropic medications such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide evidence all food was temperature checked prior to serving to confirm food had reached a safe cooking temperature. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Six residents (#1, #23, #28, #29, #39, and #198) received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the Service Line Checklists, dated 12/01/23 to 12/31/23, revealed there were no documented food temperatures on 12/15/23 for breakfast and lunch (prior to service to the residents) and no documented food temperatures on 12/19/23 for lunch. Interview on 01/03/24 at 9:50 A.M. with Dietary Manager #191 verified there was no evidence to support food temperatures were assessed for breakfast and lunch on 12/15/23 and for lunch on 12/19/23. He verified that without checking the temperatures of food, there would be no way to confirm it had reached or was maintained at a safe temperature for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's week at a glance menu, menus posted in the dining areas, review of the facility's daily newsletter, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of all alternate meals that were made available to them to allow them to make informed choices about the food they wanted to eat with each meal. This had the potential to affect all but six residents (Resident #1, #23, #28, #29, #39, and #198) who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO) and did not receive any food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 01/03/24 at 7:59 A.M., an interview with Resident #43 revealed he had food complaints when interviewed during the annual survey. He felt the food could be better and did not like what was always offered by the facility. He questioned whether the facility was required to offer an alternate meal, in addition to the main meal that was served for each of the three meals they received. He stated he often asked for an alternate to what was being served but there was only so many hot dogs you…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the probate court local rules of practice, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident had a legal guardian when the resident no longer had the ability to maintain capacity. This affected one resident (#7) of two residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility initially on [DATE] with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit (added [DATE]), intellectual disabilities (added [DATE]), dementia with mild psychotic disturbance (added [DATE]), major depression, bipolar, anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, asthma, hemiplegia, peripheral vascular disease, plasma-protein metabolism, calculus of gallbladder, spinal stenosis, wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra, nontoxic single thyroid nodule, constipation, contracture of right upper arm, dysphagia, hypertensive heart, gout, hyperlipidemia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was afforded the right to choose how often they bathed and received the type of bathing activity they preferred. This affected one resident (#83) of two residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: A review of Resident #83's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, need for assistance with personal care, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #83's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. She was not known to have displayed any behaviors or reject care during the seven day assessment period. She had a functional limitation in her range of motion of her bilateral lower extremities. A partial/ moderate assist was needed with showers/ bathing. A review of Resident #83's care plans revealed she had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident financial records and staff interview, the facility failed to notify a resident that received Medicaid benefits when the amount in the resident's account reached $200 less than the SSI resource limit for one person, and that, if the amount in the account, reaches the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose eligibility for Medicaid or SSI. This affected one of six residents whose financial records were reviewed (#59). The facility handled the funds for 62 residents. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the financial records for Resident #59 revealed the facility managed her funds. Review of a statement landscape revealed the balance in the resident's account had been greater than $1800.00 since 05/31/23. On 05/31/23 the balance was $1819.35. The current balance in the account was $1920.74. Interview with Business Office Manager #135 on 01/10/24 at 9:04 A.M. confirmed Resident #59 received Medicaid benefits. She further revealed Resident #59's power of attorney was sent a letter on 06/16/23 notifying her that the balance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advanced directives were clear and consistent. This affected one resident (#25) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 97. Findings included: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, type two diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #25's electronic medical record face sheet revealed she was a full resuscitation in case of an emergency for her advanced directives. Review of Resident #25's physician order, dated [DATE], identified she was a full resuscitation. Review of Resident #25's plan of care, dated [DATE], revealed her advanced directives were Do Not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI), review of grievance/concern log, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to resolve a resident's grievances. This affected one resident (#65) of two residents reviewed for personal property. Finding include: Medical record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, paraplegia, atrial fibrillation, pressure ulcer, heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and chronic pain. Interview on 01/02/24 at 9:39 A.M., with Resident #65 revealed someone had stolen $60.00 the first part of December (2023) out of his room while he was at an appointment. The resident also reported his transfer board was missing as well. He had to buy a new transfer board to leave the facility for Christmas due to the facility couldn't find his and the therapy would not let him borrow one from the facility. The facility had completed an investigation regarding the stolen money; however, they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident or their representative was provided with a written summary of the baseline care plan. This affected one residents (#88) of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 09/29/23. The resident had diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the prostate, liver, colon, and bone. He went home on [DATE] but was readmitted on [DATE] as he was unable to care for himself at home. He remained at the facility until 11/20/23, when he was transferred to the hospital. He did not return to the facility. Record review revealed a care plan meeting was held on 10/02/23 with the resident and his daughter. There was a section of the care plan meeting form to indicate who a copy of the care plan was provided to. It stated upon request. An additional care plan meeting was held on 10/19/23 with the resident. There was a section of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the concern log, review of invoice, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident had a comprehensive plan of care for vision. This affected one resident (#70) of two residents reviewed for sensory needs. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit. Review of the grievance/concern log dated 02/23/23 and 06/07/23 revealed Resident #70's glasses were missing. The resolution on 02/23/23 indicated the glasses would be replaced. There was no documentation regarding the resolution of resident's missing glasses for 06/07/23. Review of Resident #70's vision note dated 03/07/23 revealed the resident had 20/30 vision in bilateral eyes and required glasses. There was an additional note to encourage the resident to wear the glasses part-time for reading. Review of Resident #70's eye glass invoice dated 03/07/23 revealed the resident received a pink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans and failed to have quarterly care conferences. This affected three residents (#18, #65, and #70) of four residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and type II diabetes. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 06/06/23 revealed Resident #18 had intact cognition and had no behaviors. Review of an assessment titled Care Plan Conference Summary revealed Resident #18 had a care conference on 12/08/22, then had a care conference on 07/27/23. Review of the MDS schedule revealed Resident #18 had a quarterly MDS on 12/02/22, a quarterly MDS on 03/03/23, a quarterly MDS on 06/02/23, a quarterly MDS on 06/06/23, a discharge MDS on 07/03/23, an annual MDS on 08/23/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the care plan, and resident choice, in the areas of orthopedic follow up services, hospice services, and specialty physician consult services. This affected three residents (#26, #80, and #191) of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 09/27/23 with diagnoses including dementia and hypertension. The resident resided on the secured dementia unit. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 10/01/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It indicated the resident had no functional limitation in range of motion and required only supervision or touching assistance for sit to stand, chair to bed, toilet transfer, and walking 10 feet. It indicated a fall history but no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to arrange an audiology consult per physician's orders for a resident who was hard of hearing. This affected one resident (#30) of two residents reviewed for communication. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, and conductive hearing loss. Review of a care plan dated 08/16/23 revealed Resident #30 was at risk for impaired communication related to hard of hearing and interventions included audiology referral as needed. Review of orders revealed an order from 12/11/23 to please schedule audiology exam dx (diagnosis): hearing loss. Review of a progress note from 12/11/23 by Physician #303 revealed Resident #30 was seen regarding complaints of bilateral hearing loss with a plan of getting a consult for an audiology exam. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#65) of two reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 97. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, Stage 4 pressure ulcers (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible on some parts of the wound bed) to left and right buttocks, paraplegia, and heart failure. Review of the wound center note dated 12/18/23 revealed the resident would return in three weeks (01/08/24). Review of Nurse Practitioner (NP) note dated 12/27/23 revealed the resident reported he would not be going to the wound center for three weeks due to the holidays fell on Monday, which was his scheduled day. The resident reported he would like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure suprapubic catheter treatments and antibiotics were administered per order. This affected one resident (#65) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheter/urinary tract infection. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, paraplegia, pressure ulcers, and heart failure. Review of Resident #65's pertinent charting for infections dated 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 revealed the resident had completed antibiotic (Clindamycin) regimen and was still having pain and redness around catheter site. New antibiotic being ordered. Review of Resident #65's current orders revealed on 12/21/23 a new order was written to wash suprapubic catheter site with soap and water, pat dry, apply split drain gauze and change daily. There was no evidence a new antibiotic order was written after the resident finished the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to evaluate a resident's decline in intake to ensure the resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight. This affected one resident (#80) of four residents reviewed for nutritional status. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 09/27/23 with diagnoses including dementia and hypertension. The resident resided on the secured dementia unit. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 10/01/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It indicated the resident was independent with eating. It stated the resident was 64 inches tall, weighed 118 pounds, and had no weight changes. The resident was admitted on a regular diet. Review of the plan of care dated 09/28/23 revealed the resident was at risk for altered nutritional status related to age, variable intake, abnormal labs, history of significant weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received timely respiratory care. This affected one resident (#73) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 06/03/23 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 12/15/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of a nurse practitioner progress note dated 12/26/23 at 1:45 P.M. revealed the resident had recent heart catheterization. He was having some chest pain today with drop in oxygen saturation to 88%. He tells me that his pain is localized right to his left sided chest. He does have a moist cough. He does have some shortness of breath. He does not feel it is heart related. He has a history of heart failure as well as hypertension. Does not appear in any distress.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to schedule a pain management appointment for a resident per physician orders. This affected one resident (#65) of one resident reviewed for pain. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, chronic pain, right hip pain, low back pain, radiculopathy, lumbar and cervical region, paraplegia, Stage 4 pressure ulcers, and heart failure. Review of Resident #65's pain plan of care dated 10/16/23 revealed the resident had low back, pain, pressure ulcers, right hip pain, myalgia, neuralgia, and polyneuropathy. The resident's intervention included pain management/physician referral. Review of Resident #65's pain assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had frequent pain in back and hips that was a constant ache. The pain occasionally affected his sleep and physical activities. Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) note dated 12/27/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required dialysis services received ordered care. This affected one resident (#197) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #197 revealed an admission date of 12/19/23 and diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes, and morbid obesity. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 12/23/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. It also documented the resident was on dialysis. Interview with Resident #197 on 01/03/24 at 3:25 P.M. revealed she goes out for dialysis three times weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. She stated, and it was observed, that she has a port in her chest used for the dialysis treatments. She stated she leaves around 6-6:30 A.M. and returns around 11-11:30 A.M. She confirmed she had went to dialysis on 01/03/24. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication regimen review irregularities were reviewed by the physician and Director of Nursing (DON). This affected one resident (#47) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes mellitus, acute kidney failure, acute congestive heart failure, constipation, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/04/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #47's medication regimen review (MRR), dated for recommendations created between 06/01/23 and 06/23/23, revealed the pharmacy had noted Resident #47 was receiving an antipsychotic, Abilify, to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident medications were monitored per orders. This affected two residents (#65, #70) of five residents reviewed for medication review. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia and heart failure. Review of Resident #65's medication orders dated 10/14/23 and 01/10/24 revealed the resident was receiving Lipitor 40 mg at bedtime for hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #65's pharmacy review dated 11/27/23 revealed the pharmacist recommended laboratory monitoring for the resident's Lipitor therapy. The physician agreed on 11/29/23 to check lipid panel and liver function test (LFT) every six months. Review of Resident #65's laboratory orders revealed on 12/03/23 staff entered an order for lipid panel and LFT's every six months, however the start date wasn't until 12/04/24 (a year later). Review of Resident #65's laboratory results dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of medication error report, review of drug administration information sheet, staff education sheet, interview, and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#191) of one resident reviewed for psychotropic medication review. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #191 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, anxiety, seizures, hypertension, needs for assistance with personal care, difficult walking, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, irritable bowel syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, constipation, and moderate intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #191's pertinent charting-change in condition progress note dated 12/29/23, 12/31/23, and 01/02/24 revealed on 12/28/23 the resident received a duplicate medication administered on night shift. No adverse reaction was noted at this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained per orders. This affected one resident (#191) of one resident reviewed for change of condition. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #191 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, anxiety, seizures, hypertension, needs for assistance with personal care, difficult walking, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, irritable bowel syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, constipation, and moderate intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #191's admission history and physical dated 12/17/23 revealed to have follow-up blood work tomorrow and have psychology see her. The resident had been running up and down the hallways. She had currently fallen twice. She was on significant psychotropic medication and just need to clarify, if Depakote to be discontinued. She has a history of ulcerative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's infection control tracking logs, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not treated with an antibiotic, unless they met criteria for the treatment of an infection. They also failed to ensure a resident treated for a urinary tract infection caused by a multi-drug resistant organism received the appropriate antibiotic the identified organisms were sensitive to. This affected one resident (#21) of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI) and one resident (#47) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #21's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cerebral palsy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. A review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered a pneumococcal immunization as appropriate. This affected three of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #80, #21, and #82). The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 09/27/23. There was no evidence the resident had received or been offered a pneumococcal immunization. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/03/24 at 2:23 P.M. confirmed the resident had not had and resident/responsible party had not been offered a pneumococcal immunization. She stated it was offered on 01/03/24 and the daughter wanted her to have one but it had not been provided yet. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 08/10/22. Record review revealed he had received a Prevnar 13 vaccine on 01/26/23. (He was less than 65 when getting this vaccine). There was no evidence he had received a follow up dose of PPSV23 as recommended. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 vaccines to residents. This affected two residents (#46 and #26) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 02/07/19. Review of the immunization record revealed it simply stated the resident refused a COVID-19 vaccine. However, there was no documented evidence of education provided regarding the vaccine or a signed declination of the vaccine. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 01/03/24 at 2:23 P.M. confirmed no evidence for Resident #46 of education or signed declination of COVID-19 vaccine. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 07/17/23. Review of the immunization record revealed the resident had received COVID-19 vaccines on 01/18/21 and 06/10/22. There was no evidence the resident was provided with a booster or education regarding a booster vaccine. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 01/03/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of Resident #92's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, pseudobulbar affect (PBA), generalized anxiety disorder, difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident #92's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments revealed she had an admission MDS assessment completed on 02/18/22. Quarterly MDS assessments had been completed on 04/06/22, 07/01/22 and 10/01/22. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and her cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment noted the resident was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. No behaviors were noted. A review of Resident #92's Care Plan Conference Summary assessments revealed the resident had a care planning conference held on 08/08/22. The Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility self-reported incidents and related investigations, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse and misappropriation were thoroughly investigated. This affected eight residents (Resident #7, #10, #23, #50, #71, #72, #101, and #102) reviewed in 10 facility self-reported incidents. The facility census was 100. Findings include: 1. The following self-reported incidents (SRIs) were reviewed involving Resident #102: a. Self-reported incident (SRI) tracking number 218831 revealed an allegation of misappropriation of medications was made by Resident #102 on 03/09/22. Resident #102 alleged his medications, including Methadone 10 milligrams (mg) and Adderall 20 mg that were scheduled to be given as a scheduled dose on 03/09/22 at 12:00 P.M. and 2:00 P.M. respectively were misappropriated by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #510. The resident denied he received either medication as scheduled. The facility indicated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility self-reported incident review and related investigation, facility policy and procedure review, review of Controlled Drug Receipt/ Record/Disposition Forms, review of narcotic shift count sheets and interview the facility failed to ensure routine medications were provided to residents as ordered and failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure controlled narcotic pain medication was timely/appropriately documented when administered to residents and proper shift to shift reconciliation counts of controlled medication were completed to identify any discrepancies in the counts. The facility also failed to ensure medications were available for administration from their contracted pharmacy. This affected three residents (#86, #102 and #110) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of medication and one resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendation were addressed timely. This affected four residents (#2, #21, #39 and #71) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #2's pharmacy medication reviews from 10/2021 to 10/2022 revealed the pharmacist made recommendations on 10/22/21, 11/23/21, 12/21/21, 01/27/22, 02/25/22, 03/25/22, 04/28/22, 06/30/22, 08/26/22, 09/28/22 and 10/26/22. Further review revealed no evidence the physician addressed the recommendations made during the 10/22/21, 11/23/21, 12/21/22, 03/25/22, 04/28/22, 06/30/22 or 09/28/22 reviews. On 11/03/22 at 3:34 P.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she was not able to find or provide evidence of Resident #2's pharmacy recommendations from 10/22/21, 11/23/21, 12/21/22, 03/25/22, 04/28/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure and interview the facility failed to provide timely dental services. This affected five residents (Resident #38, #50, #54, #81, and #92) of six residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, hereditary spastic paraplegia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and essential hypertension. Review of Nursing admission Evaluation, dated 08/18/22 revealed Resident #38 came into the facility with upper and lower dentures. Documentation revealed the resident informed the facility at that time she did not wear her dentures because they did not fit properly. Review of Resident #38's Authorization Form for Ancillary and Medical Services, dated 08/19/22 revealed authorization had been provided for dental services. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in a sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 10 residents (#1, #33, #51, #59, #62, #71, #73, #76, #106 and #310) of 10 residents identified by the facility to receive pureed foods. The facility census was 100. Findings include: On 11/01/22 at 9:00 A.M. Dietary Aide (DA) #157 was observed preparing pureed foods. After preparing brussels sprout puree, DA #157 washed the puree processor in the facility dishwasher. Once the processor came out of the dishwasher, DA #157 used her bare hands to reassemble the inner workings of the processor. She then put pork into the processor before the processor was dry and proceeded to process the pork. After preparing the pork puree, DA #157 washed the puree processor in the facility dishwasher. She then used gloved hands at this time to reassemble the inner workings of the processor. DA #157 then placed potatoes into the processor before the processor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #38's advance directives/code status was consistent between the paper (hard) chart and the electronic health record (EHR). This affected one resident (#38) of 32 residents reviewed for advanced directive. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, hereditary spastic paraplegia, dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #38's paper/hard chart revealed, effective [DATE] an advanced directive indicating the resident was a Full Code with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) desired. Review of Resident #38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #38's electronic health record revealed an advanced directive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a beneficiary protection notification review form and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #41 was provided an appropriate liability notice when discontinued/cut from Medicare Part-A services with days remaining. This affected one resident (#41) of two residents reviewed for liability notices who remained in the facility. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, aphasia, apraxia, lupus, pressure ulcer of right hip, peripheral vascular disease, pseudobulbar affect, Vitamin D and Vitamin B12 deficiency, depression, anemia, hyperlipidemia, history of malignant neoplasm of the testis, alcohol abuse, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, cognitive communication deficit, and insomnia. Review of Resident #41's undated Beneficiary Protection Notification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #50 was not forced to receive care against her wishes resulting in an allegation of rough care and the resident sustaining minor skin alterations. This affected one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for physical abuse. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety, major depression, bipolar, heart disease, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #50's plan of care, dated 04/26/22 revealed the resident had potential to be physically aggressive or agitated related to anger, depression, history of harm to others, and poor impulse control. Interventions included to analyze times of days, places, circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document. Assess and anticipate resident's needs: food, thirst, toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and related investigation, review of controlled drug records/disposition forms, review of an employee personnel file, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of controlled (narcotic) medications. This affected two residents (#86 and #110) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #86's closed medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 07/08/22. The resident had diagnoses including a left femoral neck fracture (hip fracture), low back pain, and the presence of bilateral artificial hip joints. Record review revealed the resident was discharged home on [DATE]. A review of Resident #86's admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment, dated 07/14/22 revealed the resident did not have any communication issues as he was able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were provided with a transfer notice as required and failed to ensure the State Ombudsman was notified of facility initiated transfers/discharges. This affected three resident (#75, #52 and #109) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage 4, and urinary tract infection (UTI). The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/10/22 for diagnoses of small bowel obstruction, UTI, abscess of chest wall, and high troponin level. Further review of the resident's electronic medical record and paper/hard chart revealed no evidence a transfer/discharge form was completed and given or sent to the resident/resident representative. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #109 was provided a bed hold notice upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one resident (#109) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #109 had diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, absence of part of a lung, sacrolitis, paraplegia, pneumonia, Parkinson's disease, pressure ulcers, cognitive communication deficit, depression, restless leg syndrome, overactive bladder, muscle weakness, anxiety, hyperlipidemia, and lumbago with sciatica. Review of Resident #109's nursing note, dated 09/25/22 revealed the resident's oxygen saturation reading was 70 percent. No other signs of hypoxia, respirations even and unlabored. The resident was alert and oriented times four (person,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documentation was accurate to reflect the resident's cumulative diagnoses and updated following a change in mental health diagnoses. This affected one resident (#77) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, essential hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and tremors. Review of Resident #77's PASARR, dated 08/02/22 revealed under Section E, subsection 1.: Indications of Serious Mental Illness the boxes beside panic or other severe anxiety disorder and personality disorder were marked with an X. The box beside of mood disorder was not marked with an X even though Resident #77 had a depression and bipolar disorder diagnosis. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for Resident #39 prior to admission. This affected one resident (#39) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility originally on 06/23/22 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with moderate behavioral disturbance, major depression, anxiety, psychosis, and insomnia. Review of Resident #39's progress notes revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and transferred back out to the psychiatric hospital a few hours later. Review of Resident #39's paper/hard chart and electronic medical record revealed no evidence a PASARR was completed for the 06/23/22 admission or the 07/11/22 re-admission. Review of Resident #39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/19/22 revealed the resident was not considered for Level II services through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure comprehensive and individualized care plans were developed and implemented for all residents. This affected three residents (#38, #54, and #77) of 36 sampled residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, hereditary spastic paraplegia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and essential hypertension. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/25/22 revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact, had no broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture and had no natural teeth or tooth fragments. Review of Resident #38's care plan, dated 08/19/22 revealed a focus area related to the resident's dentures not fitting appropriately. An intervention included to coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, person-centered care plans were accurate to reflect the resident's current status and/or revised to include current interventions for Resident #28 related to pressure ulcers and for Resident #41 related to falls/accident hazards. This affected two residents (#28 and #41) of 36 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of shaft of left humerus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/06/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (out of 15), which indicated intact cognition. There assessment revealed the resident had no behaviors or rejection of care. The MDS 3.0 assessment further revealed Resident #28 required extensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #39 received the necessary care and weight monitoring as ordered related to a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and failed to ensure Resident #2 had appropriate indication of use of an anti-fungal medication and monitoring. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for non-pressure related skin impairment and one resident (#39) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of Resident #39's congestive heart failure plan of care, dated 07/12/22 revealed to monitor vital signs and monitor, document, report to the nurse and physician as needed for any signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) such as weight gain and weight monitoring as ordered. Review of Resident #39's physician's orders revealed an order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received optometry services timely when needed. This affected two residents (#50 and #92) of four residents reviewed for vision/hearing. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #92's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a history of a stroke with hemiplegia/ hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #92's ancillary service consent form revealed the resident consented to receive optometry services from the facility's contracted optometrist while residing in the facility. A review of Resident #92's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/01/22 revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and her cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment revealed the resident's vision was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure a thorough and complete pressure ulcer assessment was completed for Resident #28 following a re-admission to the facility and failed to ensure wound treatments were provided as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents with pressure ulcers. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of shaft of left humerus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/06/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (out of 15), which indicated intact cognition. The assessment revealed the resident had no behaviors or rejection of care. The MDS 3.0 assessment further revealed Resident #28 required extensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #28 received appropriate services to maintain range of motion/mobility and failed to ensure Resident #38 received restorative services. This affected two residents (#28 and #38) of five residents reviewed for position/range of motion and mobility. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of shaft of left humerus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/06/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (out of 15), which indicated intact cognition. The assessment revealed the resident had no behaviors or rejection of care. The MDS further revealed Resident #28 required extensive, two-person assistance with personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS assessment revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility fall investigations, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #92 received the appropriate level of assistance during a transfer and had proper footwear on at the time of the transfer to prevent an avoidable fall. The facility also failed to develop a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program for Resident #41 and failed to ensure comprehensive fall investigations were completed to identify the root cause of falls so appropriate interventions could be initiated to prevent additional falls from occurring for the resident. This affected two residents (#41 and #92) of four residents reviewed for falls and/or accident hazards. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #92's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting the left non-dominant side, unsteadiness on her feet, abnormalities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #79 received adequate and proper care during incontinence care to decrease the resident's risk of developing a urinary tract infection. In addition, the facility failed to timely obtain a urinalysis with reflex culture for Resident #28, who had symptoms of a urinary tract infection, as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#28 and #79) of nine residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use or urinary tract infection. Findings include: Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes, morbid obesity, systemic lupus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #79's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/24/22 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and always incontinent. On 11/02/22 at 2:10 P.M. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to accurately document Resident #78's enteral (tube) feeding intake to ensure the resident's overall nutritional status was monitored. This affected one resident (#78) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 07/07/22 with a readmission date of 10/28/22. Resident #78 had diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #78's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/28/22 revealed the resident was cognitively intake and received enteral feeding via a gastrostomy (feeding) tube for nutritional intake. Review of Resident #78's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 10/26/22 for dietary to evaluate calorie intake/tube feedings. Review of Resident #78's physician's order revealed an order, dated 11/03/22 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure oxygen was delivered at the flow rate ordered by the physician for Resident #38. This affected one resident (#38) of four residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, hereditary spastic paraplegia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #38's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 08/20/22 for oxygen at three liters/minute via a nasal cannula continuously. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/25/22 revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact, had an active diagnosis of respiratory failure and was receiving oxygen prior to admission and while a resident. Review of Resident #38's October and November 2022 Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #78 had an appropriate diagnosis for the use of the anti-psychotic medication, Seroquel. This affected one resident (#78) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 09/22/22 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/28/22 revealed Resident #78's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 (out of 15), which indicated intact cognition. The assessment revealed the resident did not have any hallucinations, delusions, physical or verbal behaviors, or rejection of care. The resident required total, two-person physical assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and dressing. Review of the resident's plan of care reflected the use of anti-psychotic medication. Review of a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent (%). The medication error rate was calculated to be 6.25% and included two medication errors of 32 medication administration opportunities. This affected one resident (#98) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: A review of Resident #98's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, history of a myocardial infarction (heart attack), and arthropathy (any disease of the joints such as arthritis). On 11/02/22 at 8:27 A.M., a medication administration observation was made for Resident #98's morning medication administration. The resident's medications were administered by Registered Nurse (RN) #90. During the observation, the resident was administered a Coreg (a beta blocker used in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #38 received timely diagnostic services. This affected one resident (#38) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, hereditary spastic paraplegia, dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #38's care plan, dated 08/19/22 revealed a focus related to the resident having a potential for nutritional deficits related to therapeutic and mechanically altered diet, abnormal labs, and potential for weight fluctuations related to fluid, variable intake. The goal was for Resident #38 to maintain an adequate nutritional status as evidenced by diet tolerance and adequate intakes for weight stability without significant change. An interventions to meet this goals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program including the timely implementation of contact isolation for Resident #92 who was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection that was positive for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#92) of nine residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use or urinary tract infections. Findings include: A review of Resident #92's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a history of a stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, urinary tract infection (UTI), and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection. A review of Resident #92's nursing progress notes revealed a nurse's note, dated 10/27/22 that revealed the resident was complaining of a burning sensation at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program as part of their infection control program to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotic treatment for infections. This affected three residents (#2, #79 and #77) of nine residents reviewed for unnecessary antibiotic use or urinary tract infections. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #77 revealed the resident had diagnoses including acute infections, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, essential hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and tremors. Review of acute care documentation, dated 08/16/22 revealed Resident #77 had a urine culture positive for pseudomonas, E. coli, candida with susceptibility pending. The acute care facility recommended to change the antibiotic, Rocephin to Cefepime and add Diflucan for seven days with renal dose adjustment following the first dose. Record review revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #52's call signal device was in proper working order. This affected one resident (#52) of six residents reviewed for physical environment. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #52's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/02/22 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision with (staff) set up assistance only for eating. On 10/31/22 at 2:30 P.M. observation of Resident #52's call signal device revealed the device did not activate when the button was pushed. On 11/02/22 at 8:50 A.M. observation revealed Resident #52's call signal device did activate when the button was pushed. The resident was observed to attempt to activate the call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee personnel files, review of the background check monitoring log, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their criminal background check policy for one employee. This had the potential to affect all 124 residents. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Registered Nurse (RN) #513 revealed she was hired on 05/14/24. There was no evidence that the facility determined whether RN #513 had resided in the state for the past five years. Review of the Background Check Monitoring Log revealed a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) background check was not completed. It indicated that only a state Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) check was completed with no findings. The facility had also conducted a background check with the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the System for Award Management (SAM) on RN #513 at the time of hire with no findings. Interview with the Administrator on 04/24/25 at 1:19 P.M. revealed RN #513 did not reside in the state when hired and did not move to Ohio until August 2024. He confirmed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-11-15 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of an employment list for the social service department, review of quality assessment and process improvement committee minutes, review of the facility assessment, review of facility job descriptions and interview the facility failed to provide a qualified social service worker, on a full time basis as required. This had the potential to affect all 100 residents residing in the facility. The facility capacity was 150 beds. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment, dated 11/2020 to 10/2021 revealed the facility was licensed for 150 beds and census averaged 115 to 123. The staffing section of the facility assessment only included nursing staffing (Registered Nurse, Licensed Practical Nurses, and State Tested Nurse's Aide). There was no evidence the assessment reflected the need for or use of a licensed social worker. Review of an undated employment list for the social service department revealed the last Licensed Social Worker (LSW) worked in the facility from 02/28/22 to 07/25/22. The facility indicated Corporate Licensed Social Worker (LSW)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$79,853 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $79,853 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-10 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
NOBLE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$812K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 7%Other / private 27%

This home reported $812K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$348per resident / day
operating cost
$10,586per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365687. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next