No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arbors At Milford

5900 Meadowcreek Drive, Milford, OH 45150 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (513) 248-1655 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$117,782 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $117,782 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-09)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5861 Cinema Dr · (513) 248-8800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
931 Business 28, Unit 204 · (513) 831-3735 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Meijer0.7 mi
1082 State Route 28 · (513) 576-5500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5951 Buckwheat Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
959 State Route 28

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.4%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.5%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication41.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.4%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.6%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.2%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.5%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.671.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.491.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.6%CMS range 31.4–62.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.3–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.3–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
53.1%
Total nursing turnover
78.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 71.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.82 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a hospital record, staff interview, review of the facility investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician or nurse practitioner was notified timely of a significant change in condition for a resident (#70). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death when on [DATE] at 7:46 P.M., Resident #70 was found to have elevated blood glucose levels by a nurse and after notification to the nurse practitioner, additional insulin was ordered, which the resident refused. The nurse did not make notification to the nurse practitioner or physician of the resident's refusal of additional insulin and no additional checks of the resident's blood glucose level were attempted. Resident #70 was later found on the floor, was not answering questions, but was able to move all extremities, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a hospital record, staff interview, review of the facility investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#70) was free from neglect when the facility failed to provide appropriate and timely assessment, treatment, service, and notification to the physician or nurse practitioner. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death when on [DATE] at 7:46 P.M., Resident #70 was found to have elevated blood glucose levels by a nurse and after notification to the nurse practitioner, additional insulin was ordered, which the resident refused. The nurse did not make notification to the nurse practitioner or physician of the resident's refusal of additional insulin and no additional checks of the resident's blood glucose level were attempted. Resident #70 was later found on the floor,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a closed medical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer appropriate respiratory care, administration of a ventilator at night, as ordered for Resident #10, who had a compromised respiratory status. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when the ventilator was not applied, and Resident #10 was found unresponsive, and required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for ventilator use in the last three months. The census was 62 residents. On [DATE] at 11:06 A.M., the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), [NAME] President of Clinical (VPC) #900 and Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #901 were notified the Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at bedtime when Resident #10 was not placed on a ventilator as ordered by physician from the hospital to apply a vent at hour of sleep and to wean as tolerated. On [DATE] at 6:04 P.M., Respiratory Therapist (RT) #400 transcribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, interview with the outside wound nurse practitioner (NP), review of the facility policy, and review of online guidelines per the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess residents' skin and failed to identify pressure ulcers until they reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #123 who was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer to his sacrum and developed an additional pressure ulcer to his right scapula which was not identified until it was an unstageable ulcer with slough (nonviable tissue which could impede wound healing) and necrotic (dead) tissue. This affected one (Resident #123) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified five residents with in-house acquired pressure ulcers. The facility census was 72 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 02/21/25 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the appropriate care and services for a treatment change to a nephrostomy tube. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #42 when a registered nurse utilized scissors to cut a dressing off and accidentally cut Resident #42's nephrostomy tube. Resident #42 had to undergo a surgical procedure to put the nephrostomy tube back into the right kidney and be monitored at the hospital for seven days. This affected one of three residents reviewed for an ostomy tube. Findings include: Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/14/24. Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder disorder and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #42 was dependent on staff for transfers, personal care, and bed mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 02/17/24 revealed Resident #42 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for alterations in skin integrity weekly and failed to ensure a treatment was ordered for a pressure ulcer. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #55 was admitted with a stage II pressure ulcer. No assessment or treatment was initiated on admission and the ulcer progressed to a stage III. This affected one (Resident #55) of ten residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 78. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #55 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, colostomy, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, diabetes, reduced mobility, muscle weakness, dysphagia, hypertension, and altered mental status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the pressure ulcer risk assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident experiencing chronic pain received as needed (PRN) pain medication in a timely manner. This resulted in actual harm when staff failed to ensure Resident #277 received PRN pain medication in a timely manner, when she reported pain. This affected one (#277) of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility identified 68 residents who received pain medication. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #277 revealed an admission date of 04/23/22. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, moderate persistent asthma, cellulitis of right and left lower limbs, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, muscle weakness, oral phase dysphagia, reduced mobility, anemia, and hypothyroidism. Review of the nursing admission evaluation dated 04/23/22 revealed the resident reported occasional pain during the last five days, which limited her day-to-day activities. The resident described the pain as intermittent and dull pain to her legs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs.) This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the employee file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #228 revealed a hire date of 09/14/22. CNA #228's employee file did not include an annual performance review. 2.Review of the employee file for CNA #229 revealed a hire date of 12/19/18. CNA #229's employee file did not include an annual performance review. Interview on 03/12/26 at 7:36 A.M with the Administrator confirmed the facility had not completed annual performance reviews for CNAs #228 and #229.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to properly store food. This had the potential to affect 65 facility-identified residents of 69 who consumed food prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 69 residents.Findings include: 1.Observation of dry storage area on 03/09/26 at 6:23 A.M. revealed there were three containers of cereal with ill-fitting lids which left the cereal open to air. There was also a bag of rice which was unsealed and open to air. Interview on 03/09/26 at 6:24 A.M. with the Assistant Kitchen Manager (AKM) confirmed the cereal and rice were open to air and should be discarded. 2.Observation of the walk-in freezer on 03/09/26 at 6:45 A.M. revealed it included a box of Salisbury steak patties in an unsealed bag which was unsealed and open to air and a box containing cookie dough balls in a bag that was unsealed and open to air. Interview on 03/09/26 at 6:46 A.M. with the AKM confirmed the Salisbury steak patties and cookie dough were open to air and should be discarded. 3.Observation of walk-in refrigerator on 03/09/26 at 7:07…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff spoke to residents in a respectful manner. This affected one resident (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 69 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 12/03/20 with diagnoses including spinal muscular atrophy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and type two diabetes. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #61 dated 11/05/25 per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #247 revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had not treated the resident in a respectful manner. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #61 dated 01/08/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required moderate to maximal assistance with staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the facility SRI regarding Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from emotional/verbal abuse. This affected one (Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 10/29/25 with diagnoses including generalized anxiety, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #67 dated 02/05/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and used a motorized wheelchair for mobility. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #67 dated 02/24/26 per Registered Nurse (RN) #219 revealed the resident requested to go to the hospital because she could taste soap in her mouth. Resident #67 reported she had used vaginal soap to eliminate odors after others had complained about her smell and posted about it on Facebook. RN #219 notified management and social services of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to hold quarterly care conferences for residents. This affected two (Residents #1 and #7) of 17 residents sampled. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 02/09/24 with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, epilepsy, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and systolic and diastolic heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7 dated 02/13/26 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed the only care conference documented for Resident #7 from March 2025 to March 2026 was held on 12/11/25. Interview with the Social Services Designee (SSD) on 03/11/26 at 11:21 A.M. confirmed the facility had held only one care conference for Resident #7 from March 2025 to March 2026, and the care conference was held on 12/11/25. 2.Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/26/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of medication error logs, staff interview, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected two (Residents #69 and #42) of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/02/24 with diagnosis including end stage renal disease, diabetes, and osteomyelitis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 dated 12/18/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #42 revealed an order dated 01/04/26 for Cubicin 700 milligrams (mg) per intravenous (IV) administration every other day for 34 days for treatment of an abdominal abscess. Review of the medication error log revealed the facility had a medication error involving Resident #42 on 01/28/26. Interview on 03/12/26 at 10:15 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/27/26 staff administered Cubicin 500 mg per IV to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital documentation, personnel file review, review of self-reported incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of neglect to the Administrator and State Survey Agency. This affected four (#59, #70, #122, and #123) of five residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus Type I, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic viral Hepatitis C. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge-return not anticipated assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had no cognitive deficit and was always continent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of urine. The resident required set up assistance for eating, oral and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital documentation, personnel file review, review of self-reported incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report the results of an investigation regarding resident neglect to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner and failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of neglect. This affected four (#59, #70, #122, and #123) of five residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus Type I, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic viral Hepatitis C. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge-return not anticipated assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had no cognitive deficit and was always continent of bowel and occasionally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, pharmacist interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin was properly dated and stored. This affected 10 (#2, #21, #23, #30, #49, #55, #62, #121, #124, and #321) of 26 residents the facility identified as receiving insulin. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type II, end-stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had severe cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident received nutrition through an enteral feeding tube and was dependent for oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #23 had an order dated [DATE] for Lispro…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of a planned menu, and policy review, revealed the faciity failed to follow the menu for residents ordered a regular diet. This affected 47 (#26, #21, #8, #28, #40, #58, #51, #49, #19, #31, #323, #44, #62, #56, #43, #30, #272, #37, #63, #24, #7, #48, #45, #271, #60, #57, #35, #3, #18, #32, #41, #10, #14, #324, #25, #33, #122, #15, #2, #50, #47, #64, #27, #38, #322, #39, and #54) of 47 residents ordered a regular diet. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the menu for breakfast on 03/12/25 revealed assorted juice, choice of hot or cold cereal, scrambled eggs, bacon, hash browns, and milk/beverage. Observation on 03/12/25 at 7:15 A.M revealed food to be served included hot or cold cereal, scrambled eggs, and hashbrowns, but no bacon was observed on the steam table. Interview on 03/12/25 at 7:15 A.M with Dietary [NAME] #161 stated the kitchen did not have enough bacon for everyone, so they did not put any out and they were also out of sausage, so they did not prepare a substitute. Review of the facility policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store and prepare foods in a manner to prevent spoilage and contamination. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. The facility identified 10 (#1, #5, #23, #29, #59, #65, #121, #123, #124, and #321) who received no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 03/10/25 between 7:12 A.M. and 9:30 A.M., with Food Service Director (FSD) #157 revealed two packages of pie crusts undated and unlabeled in the dry food storage area. There were two packages of English muffins and six packages of rolls that were not dated. Observation of a garbage can located by the primary preparation station and a garbage can in the dishwashing room revealed neither garbage can had lids on them. Further observation of the kitchen revealed four ceiling air ventilator covers had black spots around the ventilators and a black substance built up on them. Interview with FSD #157 verified the two packages of pie crusts were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directive was fully completed and dated by the physician. This affected one (#65) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, cutaneous abscess of the abdominal wall, renal dialysis, essential primary hypertension, heart failure, dysphagia, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/25, revealed Resident #65 had impaired cognition. Resident #65 was dependent on staff for medication administration, eating, dressing, bathing, and personal hygiene. Review of the undated form titled, DNR Comfort Care, revealed Resident #65 was indicated to have a DNR Comfort Care (DNRCC) advanced directive selected; however, there was no selection made under the section titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, and review of a government website, the facility failed to accurately code the status of a non-invasive mechanical ventilation on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected one (#60) of four residents reviewed for ventilators. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #60 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure, asthma, essential primary hypertension, chronic kidney disease, anemia, dysphagia, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 02/18/25, for Resident #60 revealed she was cognitively intact. Resident #60 was dependent on staff for medication administration, toilet use, and lower body dressing. Resident #60 required maximum assistance from staff with showers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurately completed. This affected one (#25) of two residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Medical record review for Resident #25 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with hospice services. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, acute and chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, hypothyroidism, bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and alcohol dependence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25, dated 02/15/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #25 was dependent on staff for medication administration, toilet use, bathing, lower body dressing, sit to lying position, chair to bed transfer, and tub transfer. Resident #25 required moderate assistance from staff with oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop care plans for dental care for residents with dental concerns. This affected one (#49) of three residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, combined congestive heart failure, and oropharyngeal dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #49 had no natural teeth and was not assessed as having loose fitting dentures. Review of the care plan dated 02/24/24 revealed Resident #49 had no care plan for dental care. During an interview on 03/10/25 at 1:01 P.M. Resident #49 stated his dentures did not fit due to recent gradual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented as care planned. This affected one (#55) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, and stage III chronic kidney disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of care plan dated 04/29/24 revealed Resident # 55 was at risk for falls related to generalized weakness, poor balance, decreased strength and endurance, and need for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions included to encourage to rest in the afternoon, encourage to lay in the center of the bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and physician interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed timely by the physician after admission. This affected one (#25) of three residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Medical record review for Resident #25 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with hospice services. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, acute and chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, hypothyroidism, bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and alcohol dependence. Resident #25 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25, dated 02/15/25, revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact. Resident #25 was dependent on staff for medication administration, toilet use, bathing, lower body dressing, sit to lying position, chair to bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment was worn while providing care and services for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions, failed to perform adequate hand hygiene between resident contact, and failed to ensure blood-contaminated materials were properly disposed of. This affected one (#47) of five residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions, one (#324) of two residents reviewed for laboratory services, one (#37) of one residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, morbid obesity, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and clean environment. This affected three (#12, #14, and #46) of 12 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, and dementia. Observation on 03/10/24 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Resident #46's room had an area of the wall located below heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) unit that was unpainted drywall was stained with a black substance. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident with right (dominant) side hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type II, morbid obesity, alcoholic cirrhosis, and congestive heart failure. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, review of the guidance from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement recommended infection control practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene and sterile practices during a resident's wound treatment. This affected (#2, #9, #14, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #40, #42, #43, #44, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, and #73). The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date 03/02/24. Diagnoses included COVID-19 on 03/05/24, acute diastolic heart failure, pulmonary fibrosis, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Resident #14 was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date 02/19/24. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, cognitive communication deficit, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Resident #1 was dependent with maximum assistance from staff for transferring, ambulating by wheelchair with staff, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Interview on 03/06/24 at 2:00 P.M. with Resident #1 stated the staff were nasty and did not respect her or provide appropriate care and privacy. Observation on 03/07/24 from 11:00 A.M. through 11:19 A.M. revealed Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, observations, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide activities to the residents. This affected two (#73 and #74) of five residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date 02/14/23. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer, paraplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 was cognitively intact. Resident #73 was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #73 used a wheelchair with staff at the facility to get to room or activities. Review of the plan of care dated 03/01/24 revealed Resident #73 had risks for altered activity patterns or pursuits related to her current medical condition. Interventions included to allow resident to make choices or decisions about their preferred activity pursuits, encourage to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely using a mechanical lift with two-person assistance as specified in the care plan. This affected one (#26) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility identified 26 residents that utilize mechanical lifts for transfers. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/09/24, with diagnoses including: generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, dependence on wheelchair, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #26's admission change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #26 was independent with eating. Resident #26 also required set up assistance with oral hygiene, personal hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of video camera footage, review of the ventilator manual, family and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely respond to a resident's ventilator alarm. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for ventilators. The facility identified five residents who were on a ventilator. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date 02/06/24. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, acute pulmonary insufficiency, and dependence on respirator (ventilator). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment date 02/13/24 revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Resident #34 was dependent on staff for personal care dependent on a ventilator. Review of the plan of care dated 02/06/24 revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of video footage, family and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely assessment and pressure to a resident's dialysis access site that was actively bleeding. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date 02/06/24. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease and acute pulmonary insufficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment date 02/13/24 revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Resident #34 was dependent on staff for transfers, personal care, toileting, upper and lower dressing, and bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 02/07/24 revealed Resident #34 was at risk of abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage related to anticoagulant therapy, recent surgery, and medication. Interventions included avoiding activities that could result in injury, observe for and report to physician of bleeding, blood tinged or frank blood in urine, blood in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen and acceptable food storge practices. This had the potential to affect 72 out of 72 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Tour of kitchen on 05/02/22 at 8:50 A.M. revealed there were no towels at the employee hand washing sink and there was a 12 inch by six inch hole in the wall behind the hand washing sink. There was thawing wrapped meat in a pan of water. The reach in refrigerator and freezer had no temperature log completed after the date of 04/28/22 and had no inside thermometers. There were approximately 10 to 15 containers of covered food bowls without labels and dates. The dry storage shelving and pan storage shelves in the tray line contained debris of dried food. Two trash containers, on carts, had dried food debris on the wheels and up the sides of the trash containers. The walk-in refrigerator and the walk in freezer had no inside thermometer, and a last date of 04/30/22 of logged temperatures on the outside door. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of personnel files, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility implemented contact precautions for a resident with methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This affected one resident (#42) out of two residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. The facility identified 12 residents that were assisted by respiratory therapists. In addition, the facility failed to implement their tuberculosis control plan and ensure all newly hired employees were tested for tuberculosis. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, dependence on respirator ventilator status, tracheostomy status, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, aphonia, other dysphagia, weakness, and atopic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely feeding assistance to a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility identified nine residents that required assistance with feeding. The facility also failed to ensure residents were provided with routine showers and/or bathing. This affected four (Residents #5, #33, #53, and #63) of five residents reviewed for hygiene. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1a. Review of the medical record of Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/19/16. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, dysphagia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, heart failure, end-stage renal disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, feeding difficulties, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was enough staff to respond to call lights, provide timely incontinence care, provide assistance with meals and provide treatments. This affected 11 (Residents #45, #34, #42, #33, #24, #68, #10, #64, #26, #5, #63, ) of 25 residents reviewed for staffing. The census was 78. Findings included: 1. During interview on 05/02/22 and 05/03/22, Residents #45, #34, #42, and #24 stated the response time for call lights was long. 2. During observation on 05/03/22 at 7:44 A.M., the call lights for Residents #10, #64 and #68 were on. During observation on 05/03/22 at 8:03 A.M., an unidentified State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) said there was no STNA assigned to these resident's hall. She did not stop to answer any of the three call lights. AT 8:13 A.M., Unit Manager UM) #328 came down the hall but did not answer any of the three call lights. Resident #38's call light. Resident #10's call light was answered at 8:21 A.M. Resident #64's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were timely addressed by the physician and timely implemented pharmacy recommendations agreed by the physician. This affected four (Residents #5, #31, #45, and #52) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, with hypoxia, dependence on respirator ventilation status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, post traumatic stress disorder, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner. This affected seven (Residents #10, #24, #34, #42, #45, #64, and #68) of 25 residents reviewed for call lights. The census was 78. Findings include: 1. During interview on 05/02/22 and 05/03/22, Residents #45, #34, #42, and #24 stated the response time for call lights was long. 2. During observation on 05/03/22 at 7:44 A.M., the call lights for Residents #10, #64 and #68 were on. During observation on 05/03/22 at 8:03 A.M., an unidentified State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) said there was no STNA assigned to these resident's hall. She did not stop to answer any of the three call lights. AT 8:13 A.M., Unit Manager UM) #328 came down the hall but did not answer any of the three call lights. Resident #38's call light. Resident #10's call light was answered at 8:21 A.M. Resident #64's light was answered at 8:23 A.M. and Resident #68's light was finally answered at 8:30 A.M. During interview on 05/03/22 at 8:34 A.M., Resident #68 stated it can take up to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive and quarterly assessments. This affected two (Residents #46 and #60) of 28 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, and Osteoarthritis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment and requires extensive assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The MDS indicated Resident #46 was receiving hospice services. During an interview on 05/04/22 at 9:09 A.M., Resident #46's assigned nurse, Registered Nurse (RN) # 334 revealed the resident does not receive hospice services. During an interview on 05/04/22 at 9:18 A.M., the MDS nurse, RN #400, revealed resident #46…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure routine care conferences were completed. This affected three (Residents #33, #51, and #53) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included undisclosed fracture of cervical vertebra, type II diabetes, and chronic diastolic heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had moderately impaired cognition, no behaviors, did not refuse care, and did not wander. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 had documentation for care conferences on 06/25/21 attended by speech therapy, the social worker, the dietitian, the nursing staff and the healthcare Power of Attorney/daughter, and on 05/03/22 attended by the nursing staff, the social worker, and two daughters. Interview on 05/04/22 at 1:02 P.M., the Social Worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, anxiety disorder, diabetes, and weight loss. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #31 had a new physician order dated 04/20/22 for hospice services. Review of the medical record revealed no hospice provider documentation, including the hospice plan of care and hospice progress notes. Review of the Plan of Care dated 04/20/22, revealed Resident #31 was identified to receive hospice services. The interventions included to coordinate facility care with the hospice provider. Review of Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #348's progress notes dated 04/25/22 and review of Care Conference dated 04/25/22 revealed LSW #348, the physician, Resident #31's Power of Attorney and a facility nurse attended the care conference. During interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided to residents. This affected two (Residents #33 and #26) of two residents reviewed for incontinent care. The facility identified there were 46 residents who were incontinent. The census was 78. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, fibromyalgia, depression, pain, hypertension, dementia without behavioral disturbances. Review of care plan, dated 06/23/21, for Resident #33 revealed she needed activities of daily living (ADL) assistance related to hip replacement. her interventions were to check and change every two hours, change briefs and provide incontinence care. Review of quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/27/22, revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. She was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure physician orders were accurate and implemented. This affected two (Residents #5 and #60) of 28 residents reviewed for accuracy of physician orders. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed a readmission date of 01/22/22 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/01/22, revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment and required limited assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The MDS indicated the resident had one stage two pressure ulcer and the treatments included a pressure reducing device for her bed. Review of Resident #60's May 2022 physician orders revealed an order for a low loss air mattress, dated 12/29/21 and an order dated 04/29/22 to cleanse buttocks with peri wash, pat dry,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered without error. This affected one (Resident #31) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 78. Findings included Review of the medical record review for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 10/17/19. Diagnoses included diabetes. Review of the physician orders dated 09/15/21 revealed Novolog Solution 100 unit milliliters (ml) (Insulin Aspart) to inject five units subcutaneously before meals related to diabetes. Observation of the medication administration on 05/04/22 at 12:10 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #345 pulled out the Novolog pen and placed a needle on the end of the pen and dialed up five units of the insulin and administered the insulin to Resident #31. Interview with LPN #345 on 05/04/22 at 12:15 P.M. revealed she was not aware she was supposed to expel two units from the insulin pen to ensure the pen was working correctly. She she verified she had not expelled two units of insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services. This affected one (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, with hypoxia, dependence on respirator ventilation status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, post traumatic stress disorder, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #45 was not reported to have a broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and provide the correct puree diet food portion. This affected one (Resident #31) of three residents who received a physician ordered puree diet. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, anxiety disorder, diabetes, and weight loss. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders dated May 2022 revealed Resident #31 had a puree consistency diet order. Observation on 05/04/22 at 11:55 A.M. during lunch tray line, revealed Resident #31 received three ounces of meat instead of the menu planned four ounces of meat. The portion of puree bread was an approximate served from an incorrect sized scoop. Interview on 05/04/22 at 12:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-05-13 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nurse Aide (STNAs) received annual performance review evaluations. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nurse (STNA) #302's personnel file revealed STNA #302 was hired on 07/08/20. Further review of STNA #302's personnel file reviewed STNA #302 had not received an annual performance review evaluation from 07/08/20 to 07/08/21. Review of State Tested Nurse (STNA) #380's personnel file revealed STNA #380 was hired on 01/07/20. Further review of STNA #380's personnel file reviewed STNA #380 had not received an annual performance review evaluation from 01/07/21 to 01/07/22. Review of State Tested Nurse (STNA) #396's personnel file revealed STNA #396 was hired on 04/25/06. Further review of STNA #396's personnel file reviewed STNA #396 had not received an annual performance review evaluation from 04/21/21 to 04/25/22. Review of State Tested Nurse (STNA) #406's personnel file revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$117,782 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
  • $66,291 — penalty dated 2024-12-04
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-03-19
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-17 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/02/2015
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/02/2015
NOBLE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$688K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 25%Medicare 5%Other / private 70%

This home reported $688K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$468per resident / day
operating cost
$14,237per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$397per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365675. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next