No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arbors At Sylvania

7120 Port Sylvania Drive, Toledo, OH 43617 · For profit - Corporation · 77 certified beds · (419) 841-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 841-2200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2024
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7140 Port Sylvania Dr · (419) 843-8100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3400 Meijer Dr · (419) 843-1370 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.2 mi
3160 Percentum Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Waterworks Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2728 King Rd · (419) 843-9393

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%5.3%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.9%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.2%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.2%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.4%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%12.9%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.2%CMS range 33.9–61.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.2–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.7–11.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
47.4%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 71.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.548 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-17)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-22)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms and shower rooms were kept in a clean and sanitary manner, and in good repair. This affected 11 residents (#20, #23, #24, #29, #35, #40, #54, #59, #60, #70, and #73) residing on the 400 hall and 39 residents (#1, #2, #3, #6, #7, #13, #14, #17, #18, #21, #25, #26, #27, #31, #32, #33, #34, #36, #37, #38, #39, #42, #43, #44, #47, #48, #49, #50, #52, #53, #55, #56, #58, #62, #63, #64, #66, #69, and #72) on the 100/200 hall. The facility census was 72.Findings include:Observation on 06/29/26 at 9:46 A.M. with Housekeeping Group Manager (HGM) #300 of the shared bathroom for Resident #20 and Resident #73 revealed there was a buildup of debris and grime in the bathroom corners, dust on the air vent above the toilet, stained flooring, and the shower tiles had a buildup of a black/brown substance in the grout lines.Interview on 06/29/26 at 9:46 A.M., with HGM #300 verified the condition of the bathroom. HGM #300 revealed it was on the list to clean the grout in the showers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0778 — isolated
    Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility's resident appointment calendar, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure transportation was timely scheduled for an echocardiogram. This affected one (#7) of three residents reviewed for medical appointments and transportation. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/08/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage three, and the presence of a cardiac pacemaker. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan last revised 12/15/25 revealed Resident #7 had impaired cardiovascular status related to atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, pacemaker placement, obesity, chest pain, and hyperlipidemia. One of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility investigation documents, review of an incident and accident log, review of a performance improvement document, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate medications were ordered upon admission to prevent significant medication errors. This affected one (#100) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 08/18/25 and a discharge date of 09/03/25. Diagnoses included depression and displace Maisonneuves fracture of the left leg (severe ankle injury that caused a spiral fracture in the tibia bone of the leg).Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #100 revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of the community referral form (CRF; a document on which admitting physician orders are obtained from for continued medication compliance) dated 08/18/25 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #274) of four reviewed for significant weight loss. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #274 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include myasthenia gravis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, dementia, gastroparesis, anxiety disorder, depression, paraplegia (paraparesis), and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and showering. Further, the resident required setup assistance for eating and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #274's weight record revealed a significant weight loss noted between the dates of 01/30/25 (admission) and 06/10/25. On 01/30/25 Resident #274 weighed 165 lbs. On 05/03/25 (prior to hospitalizations) Resident #274 weighed 147.3 lbs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain and administer ordered medication for Resident #274 in a timely manner. This affected one (#274) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #274 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include myasthenia gravis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Dementia, gastroparesis, anxiety disorder, depression, paraplegia (paraparesis), and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and showering. Further, the Resident required setup assistance for eating and personal hygiene. Further review of the medical record for Resident #274 revealed upon admission, the resident had a medication order for Pyridostigmine Bromide 30 milligrams (mg) three times a day. Pyridostigmine is a medication ordered to treat a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate infections control practices were carried out. This had the potential to affect the 38 residents (#55, #37, #4, #33, #50, #5, #29, #47, #17, #11, #35, #28, #26, #9, #44, #42, #41, #18, #51, #43, #67, #7, #15, #25, #30, #6, #277, #52, #24, #12, #22, #8, #36, #54, #13, #27, #1, and #49) who resided on the 100 and 200 hallways. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/14/25 at 9:18 A.M. of the 200 hallway found four rooms identified as being on droplet isolation. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including gowns, gloves, respirators (N-95s), and a face shields were available for each room on the over the door organizer. Signs with directions for donning personal protective equipment (PPE) were posted on the doors. Observation on 04/14/25 at 9:21 A.M. found Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #562 donned a gown, N-95, gloves and face shield and entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a comfortable mattress was provided following a request. This affected one (#53) of 24 residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs and requests. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of bilateral lower extremity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, spinal stenosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, mood disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 4, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and muscle weakness. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #53 had intact cognition, had range of motion impairment to upper and lower bilateral extremities, was dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to address edema were initiated. This affected one (#01) of two residents reviewed for edema prevention and monitoring. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #01 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, anxiety disorder, contracture to bilateral hands, elbows and shoulders, localized edema, and chronic pain. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #01 had severely impaired cognition, no refusals of care, bilateral upper and lower extremity range of motion impairment, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown. Observation on 04/14/25 at 8:55 A.M. noted Resident #01 seated in a specialized wheelchair with bilateral arms resting dependent at her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent deterioration of contractures. This affected one (#01) of two residents reviewed for range of motion and positioning. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #01 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, anxiety disorder, contracture to bilateral hands, elbows and shoulders, localized edema, and chronic pain. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #01 had severely impaired cognition, no refusals of care, bilateral upper and lower extremity range of motion impairment, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown. On 08/27/21 a physician order was written to place a washcloth in each of Resident #01's hands to keep fingers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented as indicated. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for fall management. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Resident #24's medical record review revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, [NAME] lymphoma, hypertension, seizure disorder, abnormal posture, chronic kidney disease stage 3, coronary artery disease, anemia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, and cardiac arrhythmia. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #24 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, no recorded refusal of care, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living, incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the fall assessment dated [DATE] at 8:06…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure timely care and treatment was provided to address incontinence. This affected two (#40 and #63) of five residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence services. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, depressed mood, stage 2 pressure ulcer to sacral region and left buttock. dysphagia, and anemia. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #40 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, range of motion impairments to the bilateral upper and lower extremities, dependency on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility and incontience care as Resident #40 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was running at the prescribed rate. This affected one resident (#29) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility identified 15 residents required the use of oxygen therapy. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 12/09/22 with admitting diagnoses of heart failure and end stage renal disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #29 revealed he was cognitively intact and required the use of oxygen. Review of the care plan revised 02/25 for Resident #29 revealed he was care planned for impaired cardiovascular stated related to heart failure with an intervention for oxygen therapy as ordered. Review of the current physician orders for 04/25 revealed Resident #29 was ordered oxygen at two liters per minute continuously via nasal cannula. Observation on 04/14/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure alternative and non-pharmacologic interventions were implemented to address pain in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (#177) of two residents reviewed for pain control interventions. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #177 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cauda equina syndrome, spinal stenosis lumbar region, abnormal posture, chronic venous hypertension, chronic pain, chronic fatigue, allergy status to unspecified drugs, medications and biological substances, and lumbago with sciatica. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #177 was cognitively intact, was able to make needs known, had limited bilateral lower extremity range of motion, required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living, received scheduled and as needed (PRN) pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to keep the privacy curtain clean in the residents room. This affected one resident (#5) of 24 reviewed for environment. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/12/21 and an admission diagnosis of dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #5 revealed he was cognitively impaired and was dependent for all care. Review of the care plan revised 02/25 for Resident #5 revealed he was care planned for behaviors related to dementia of taking his brief off in bed. Observation on 04/15/25 at 1:28 P.M. revealed Resident #5's privacy curtain had several brown stains that were unidentifiable along the bottom of the privacy curtain approximately one third up the privacy curtain and approximately two feet in length. Interview on 04/15/25 at 1:37 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #569 verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, facility documentation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of medication diversion was reported to the Administrator in a timely manner. This affected one (#71) of three sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, protein calorie malnutrition, mild dementia, heart failure, anemia, bipolar disorder, major depression, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and dysphonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was assessed with intact cognition, required substantial assistance to full dependence for completion of activities of daily living, received scheduled and as needed pain medication, and received antianxiety, antidepressant,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, facility documentation, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of medication diversion was thoroughly investigated. This affected one (#71) of three sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, protein calorie malnutrition, mild dementia, heart failure, anemia, bipolar disorder, major depression, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and dysphonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was assessed with intact cognition, required substantial assistance to full dependence for completion of activities of daily living, received scheduled and as needed pain medication, and received antianxiety, antidepressant, opioid medications. Review of a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed per physician order. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 66. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertension, dementia, anemia, depression, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/16/24, revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact. The resident required assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of an interdisciplinary team progress note dated 01/05/24 revealed the wound to the bridge of Resident #24's nose was an area that began as a small open area that the resident continually picked at. Review of Resident #24's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/28/23 through 03/05/24 to cleanse the bridge of the nose with saline, pat dry, and apply the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper bed mobility assistance to a dependent resident resulting in a avoidable fall. This affected one (#19) of three resident falls reviewed. Facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include multiple sclerosis, type II diabetes, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder, mild cognitive impairment, osteoarthritis, dementia, hypertension, attention and concentration deficit, difficulty walking, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/01/23, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Resident #19 required partial/moderate assistance with rolling from left to right. Review of Resident #19 fall incident report and progress notes, dated 11/23/23, revealed State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #101 was assisting Resident #19 with moving in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility corrective action documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter had orders for the placement and received associated care with maintenance of the drainage system. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The census was 70. Finding include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, metabolic encephalopathy, acute lymphadenitis, autoimmune encephalitis, muscle weakness, depression, hypertension, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was dependent with toileting and elimination with assistance. There was no documentation an indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was documented evidence contained in the medical record to include the placement and care of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The census was 70. Finding include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, metabolic encephalopathy, acute lymphadenitis, autoimmune encephalitis, muscle weakness, depression, hypertension, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was dependent with toileting and elimination with assistance. There was no documentation an indwelling urinary catheter was in place. Review of a nursing admission evaluation completed on 06/08/23 revealed Resident #1 was documented with a Foley catheter (indwelling urinary catheter) in place. Review of a Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility recipe, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were the correct texture. This affected four residents (#3, #4, #8, and #27) the facility identified on a pureed diet. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation of dining on 12/19/22 at 11:45 A.M. revealed residents in the dining room eating lunch. Further observation of the pureed chicken pot pie revealed concerns regarding appropriate texture due to the varied appearance of the texture. Tasting on 12/19/22 at 11:56 A.M. of the pureed chicken pot pie by the surveyor and the Dietary Account Manager #367 confirmed it was not fully pureed. The surveyor suggested the skins of corn were still intact while the Dietary Account Manager #367 suggested it was skins of beans that were still intact. Continued interview at that time confirmed the texture was inappropriate to be served as a pureed texture. Review of the recipe for Pot Pie Filling, Chicken revealed For Pureed: Measure desired number of servings into food processor. Blend until smooth.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level 2 Pre admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for one (Resident #10) resident of four reviewed for a Level 2 PASRR. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 04/12/21 with diagnoses of transient ischemic attack, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, altered mental status, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #10 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and toileting, extensive assistance of one person for hygiene, and total dependence on two people for transfers. Further review revealed he received an antipsychotic and an antidepressant. Antipsychotics were received on a routine basis only. Review of a letter from the Ohio Department of Medicaid titled Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Result, dated 07/11/22, revealed a referral had been made for a Level II evaluation. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents that required assistance with oral care were provided adequate care and services. This affected one resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified 29 residents that required staff assistance with activities of daily living. The census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/30/19. Diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, anogenital herpes viral infection, anxiety disorder, pseudobulbar affect, contracture of the left and right hands, dysphagia, localized edema, and contracture of the left and right shoulders. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was assessed with impaired cognition and did not speak. The activities of daily living (ADLs) Care Area Assessment (CAA) as part of the annual MDS assessment revealed Resident #1 required the totally dependence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for one (Resident #49) of two residents reviewed for fall interventions. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 04/23/21 with diagnoses of history of falling, difficulty in walking, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had impaired cognition and required supervision of one person for bed mobility and hygiene, was independent with setup help for transfers and eating, required limited assistance of one person for dressing, extensive assistance of one person for toileting. Review of the Fall Risk Assessment completed 05/20/22 revealed Resident #49 had a score of 17.0 indicating fall interventions were required. Review of the physician order dated 05/25/22 revealed Resident #49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (tube feeding) was provided per physician orders for one (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 09/10/22 with diagnoses of unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, acute kidney failure, history of urinary tract infections. Review of the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was rarely/never understood and was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily life. Review of a physician order dated 12/01/22 revealed Resident #6 received enteral nutrition at 100 milliliters (ml) per hour for 12 hours daily from 6:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. Review of Resident #6's weight history revealed a significant weight loss of 19.9% over six months from 157.4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for oxygen use. This affected one (#24) of two residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 11/23/22 and a readmission date of 12/14/22 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the 5-day minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had intact cognition and received oxygen. Review of the current physician orders revealed no orders for oxygen. Review of the current care plan revealed Resident #24 received oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute. Observation on 12/19/22 at 10:44 A.M. revealed Resident #24 wearing a nasal cannula and receiving oxygen at 3 liters per minute. Interview at that time with Resident #24 confirmed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of facility policies, and review of manufacturer instructions ,the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This resulted in three medication errors of 25 total opportunities for a medication error rate of 12%. This affected three (#17, #30 and #60) of nine residents observed during medication administration. The census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's record revealed an admission date of 11/23/21. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type II, vitamin D deficiency, gastroesophageal reflux, atrial flutter, cerebral infarction, osteoarthritis, and dementia. Review of a physician order dated 12/13/22 revealed Resident #17 was ordered Insulin Detemir, 100 units per milliliter, with 15 units ordered to be injected subcutaneously each morning. Observation of Registered Nurse (RN) #300 on 12/20/22 at 8:13 A.M. revealed RN #300 completed hand hygiene, removed the individual bag labeled for Resident #17 from the top…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of drug manufacturer's instructions, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered as ordered. This affected three (#17, #30 and #60) of nine residents observed during medication administration and three (#17, #30 and #60) of three residents reviewed for insulin usage. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's record revealed an admission date of 11/23/21. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type II, vitamin D deficiency, gastroesophageal reflux, atrial flutter, cerebral infarction, osteoarthritis, and dementia. Review of a physician order dated 12/13/22 revealed Resident #17 was ordered Insulin Detemir, 100 units per milliliter, with 15 units ordered to be injected subcutaneously each morning. Observation of Registered Nurse (RN) #300 on 12/20/22 at 8:13 A.M. revealed RN #300 completed hand hygiene, removed the individual bag labeled for Resident #17 from the top drawer of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure smoking safety for one resident (#10) of one reviewed for smoking. The facility identified eight residents who smoked. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 04/23/21 with diagnoses of history of falling, difficulty in walking, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had impaired cognition and required supervision of one person for bed mobility and hygiene, was independent with setup help for transfers and eating, required limited assistance of one person for dressing, extensive assistance of one person for toileting. Review of the Nursing Quarterly/Significant Change Evaluation dated 12/01/22 revealed a Safe Smoking Evaluation was completed on Resident #49 and the evaluation concluded Resident #49 was safe to smoke unsupervised in designated smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, staff interview, resident interview, and a resident group interview, the facility failed to address resident concerns regarding call lights being turned off by staff and needs not being met. This affected thirteen residents (#2, #5, #12, #21, #22 #26, #31, #33, #34, #47, #50, #57, and #60) who attended Resident Council during the months of December 2019, January 2020, and February 2020 and one resident (#23) whose light was turned off twice without care. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident Council minutes from 12/20/19, 01/17/20, and 02/19/20 revealed residents had a concern of call lights being turned off and staff not coming back. Thirteen residents (#2, #5, #12, #21, #22 #26, #31, #33, #34, #47, #50, #57, and #60) were in attendance over the three months. Observation on 02/24/20 at 8:58 A.M. revealed Resident #23's call light was activated. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #400 was observed to exit the resident's room and the call light was turned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of a daily medication refrigerator temperature log, and review of manufacturers' storage recommendations, the facility failed to store medication requiring refrigeration at the proper temperature in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. This had the potential to affect seven residents (#10, #17, #33, #47, #48, #50, and #61) identified by the facility as having orders for medications being stored in the refrigerator. The census was 59. Findings include: Observation on 02/27/20 at 9:42 A.M., revealed the medication refrigerator located in the Subacute East Unit medication room had an internal temperature of 30 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Resident medication found to be stored in the refrigerator included six unopened Humalog insulin pens, three unopened Lantus insulin pens, 10 unopened Novolog insulin pens, two unopened Basaglar insulin pens, three unopened Levemier insulin pens, and an unopened vial of Novolog insulin. Review of February 2020 daily medication refrigerator temperatures located in the Subacute East Unit medication room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, review of list of supervised smoking residents, staff interview, and review facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who required supervision with smoking were not in possession of cigarettes and lighters. This affected one (#23) of one residents reviewed for smoking at the facility. The census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/23/19. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left dominant side, antisocial personality disorder, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, and diabetes type 2. Review of the last Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/20, revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #23 was a supervised smoker. Review of list of residents who smoke provided by the facility revealed Resident #23 was a supervised smoking resident. Interview on 02/24/20 at 10:08…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0772 — isolated
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered by the physician and at the appropriate times to monitor therapuetic drug levels for one (#48) of one resident reviewed for intravenous antibiotic therapy. The facility census was 59. Findings include; Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type 1 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, benign prostatic hyperplasia, epilepsy, major depression, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, osteomyelitis, acute kidney failure, and history of transient cerebral attack. Review of the physician orders dated 02/04/20 revealed an order for the antibiotic Vancomycin 1250 milligrams (mg) to be administered intravenously (IV) every day shift for osteomylitis with the pharmacy to dose. Review of the February 2020 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to wear clean gloves during medication administration for one (#45) resident. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/31/19. Diagnoses included dysthymic disorder, chronic diastolic heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hypertension, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/08/20, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Observation on 02/24/20 at 11:20 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #402 entered Resident #45's room for medication administration, which included an injection. LPN #402 dropped one disposable glove on the resident's floor, picked up the glove off the floor, and put it on. LPN #402 then administered medication, including an injection. Interview on 02/24/20 at 11:22 A.M. with LPN #402…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
NOBLE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$536K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 17%Medicare 4%Other / private 79%

This home reported $536K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$288per resident / day
operating cost
$8,764per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366060. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next