Arbors At Gallipolis

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, review of a self-reported incident (SRI), review of facility investigative documentation, review of facility video footage, personnel file review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to protect Resident #70's right to be free from abuse by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) #210, #220 and #225. Actual harm occurred on 04/11/26 when Resident #2, who was cognitively impaired and diagnosed with dementia, was physically and psychosocially abused by CNAs #210, #220, and #225. The three CNAs forced the resident into a chair, held his arms down to keep him seated, and were overheard by other residents teasing and laughing at him. A reasonable person in the resident's position would have experienced fear, distress, humiliation, and a loss of dignity as a result of this treatment. Following the incident, Resident #2 was noted to have bruising and a skin tear to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of online manufacturer guidance, and interview the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained in a safe manner to prevent falls with injury for Resident #43 and Resident #50. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent Resident #48 from falls and eloping. Actual harm occurred on 02/03/23 when Resident #50 sustained a fall when the anti-rollbacks on his wheelchair were not properly functioning. The resident complained of severe pain for three days following the incident, with a decrease in functional mobility without any type of interventions. On 02/06/23 the resident was admitted to the hospital with a fractured right hip. Actual harm also occurred on 06/01/23 when Resident #43, who required staff assistance for personal care fell from a shower gurney after the rail of the gurney broke sustaining a fractured femur. Prior to the incident, there was no evidence the facility conducted any type of preventative maintenance or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #2, who had a diagnosis of dementia with behaviors received adequate, necessary and effective interventions as per his care plan to de-escalate a behavioral episode and to prevent increased agitation for the resident. This affected one resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, unspecified psychosis, depression, seizure disorder, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. Record review revealed a plan of care dated 03/13/26 for behaviors related to dementia, psychosis, depression, and insomnia as evidenced by restlessness, anxiousness/ nervousness, physical aggression, hallucinations, delusions, exit seeking, history of verbal aggression, and wandering. Interventions included administer medications as ordered and observe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure opened multi-dose Tuberculin Purified Protein (TB) vials were dated when opened. This had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 04/17/25 10:15 A.M., observation of the third floor medication room refrigerator revealed an opened vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein one milliliter (ml) was undated to when the first dose was obtained. Registered Nurse (RN) #196 verified the vial of TB solution was not dated when opened at the time of the observation. On 04/17/25 at 10:22 A.M., observation of the second floor medication room refrigerator revealed an opened vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein one milliliter (ml) was undated to when the first dose was obtained. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #157 verified the TB solution was not dated when opened at the time of the observation.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement adequate and effective interventions to promote healing and prevent the deterioration of a left below the knee surgical site with staples for Resident #48 at the time of the resident's admission. This affected one resident (#48) reviewed for surgical wounds and for pressure wounds.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 3/20/25 with diagnoses including acquired absence of left leg below knee, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, cerebral infarction, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with gangrene, left leg, hemiplegia, affecting left non-dominant side, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #48's admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a left below the knee amputation with 35 surgical staples measuring 7.82 centimeters (cm) by by 2.87 cm. Review of Resident #48's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to implement interventions to promote skin integrity for a resident ordered to wear a knee brace. This affected one resident (#48) of one resident reviewed for skin integrity. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48, revealed an admission date of 3/20/25 (from the hospital). Diagnoses included but were not limited to acquired absence of left leg below knee, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, cerebral infarction, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with gangrene, left leg, hemiplegia, affecting left nondominant side, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the hospital discharge paperwork dated 03/20/25 for Resident #48 revealed a left knee immobilizer to be on at all times. Review of the plan of care dated 03/20/25 for Resident #48 revealed the resident had impaired skin integrity related to recent surgery; mobility status as evidenced by: assist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered fall interventions were in implemented as ordered for two residents (#6 and #40) with known falls. This affected two residents of six residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an initial admission date of 12/26/22 with the diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, diverticulosis, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, psychosis, mood disorder, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, polyneuropathy, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, cardiomyopathy and dysphagia. Review of the plan of care dated 07/28/23 and last revised on 04/16/25 revealed the resident was at risk for falls/injury related to bladder incontinence, generalized weakness, history of falls, impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the administration of oxygen therapy and post an oxygen warning sign. This affected one resident (#48) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48, revealed an admission date of 3/20/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to acquired absence of left leg below knee, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, cerebral infarction, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with gangrene, left leg, hemiplegia, affecting left nondominant side and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 which suggests moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self, bed mobility and total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop a comprehensive plan of care for one resident (#31) with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This affected one of four residents reviewed for mood/behavior. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an initial admission date of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to psychosis, schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, hypertension, hypothyroidism, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, obstructive sleep apnea, tremor, anxiety disorder, severe morbid obesity, constipation, dissociative and conversion disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic kidney disease, insomnia, borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, osteoarthritis and overactive bladder. Review of the resident's initial social service history dated 01/19/23 revealed the resident did not have PTSD. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility alternative dispute resolution agreements, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents understood the agreement they signed. This affected two of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements (Residents #15 and #68). The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 01/23/25. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 01/27/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of a facility Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement dated 01/23/25 revealed Resident #68 signed the agreement on 02/14/25. The agreement stated it demonstrated a mutual intention to resolve disputes between them outside of court and to submit their disputes to Alternative Dispute Resolution through mediation and/or arbitration. The form also stated that the resident had been offered to, or had been able to view an audio/visual recorded video that details this agreement and what it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's infection control logs, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained an effective infection control program that adequately identified organisms causing infections within the facility and properly track those infections to identify any trends or patterns. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility's census was 80. Findings include: A review of the facility's infection control logs for the past 12 months revealed the facility's infection preventionist was utilizing a floor plan to identify where infections were noted throughout the facility for each month. She had a floor plan for the second floor and a floor plan for the third floor. The floor plan was color coded to show the locations of the rooms in which different types of infections occurred. One color was used to signify each type of the following infections: urine, respiratory, skin, and other. The floor plan did not indicate what organisms were present for the different types of infections…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's infection control log, infection reports, record review, review of the McGeer's criteria, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure residents only received antibiotics when warranted and antibiotics prescribed were appropriate for the infections being treated. This affected four (Resident #33, #75, #77, and #235) of five residents reviewed for infections. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #33's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included adult onset diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. A review of Resident #33's physician's orders revealed she had an order in place to cleanse a wound to the left sole of her foot, pat dry, apply Betadine to the wound bed, and cover with a foam dressing daily. The treatment was ordered on 05/04/23. A review of Resident #33's skin and wound assessments revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $650K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH