No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arbors At Pomeroy

36759 Rocksprings Road, Pomeroy, OH 45769 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 91 certified beds · (740) 992-6606 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$52,231 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $52,231 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
33101 Hiland Rd # B · (740) 992-0220 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Kroger4.6 mi
700 E Main St · (740) 992-5490 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
700 East Main Street
Park
OH-248 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.2%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication48.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.8%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.2%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.501.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.101.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.9%CMS range 30.4–58.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.6–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 3.8–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.17
RN hours/ resident / day
0.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.82
RN hoursweekends
46.0%
Total nursing turnover
52.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 73.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.17 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-06)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) reports, review of hospital records, review of National Weather Service website, review of a facility investigation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate and proper interventions were provided to prevent resident heat stroke during an outside activity. The facility also failed to ensure outdoor activities were planned and provided to meet the safety and total care needs of residents. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm and/or adverse health outcomes on 06/21/25 when facility staff took 13 residents to the zoo with the outside temperature reaching 88 degrees with a heat index of 90. The residents were at the zoo from approximately 12:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Residents complained of not feeling well and being hot at the zoo. After leaving the zoo, the residents loaded a bus that had not been pre-cooled and drove to a local fast-food restaurant where they were provided meals while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility's fall investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #55 was provided the assistance needed to prevent an avoidable fall from occurring that resulted in major injury to the resident and failed to ensure Resident #44's room was free of a safety hazard (an electrical heated curling iron). This affected two residents (#55 and #44) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 65. Actual harm occurred on 09/26/23 when Resident #55, who was severely cognitively impaired was observed ambulating in the hall, without the use of her walker, and was only educated by a staff member that she needed her assistive device when ambulating. At the time of the incident, Resident #55 was encouraged to return to her room, without being provided the appropriate staff assistance needed and fell fracturing her left hip requiring surgical repair Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #55's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-04-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, and generalized muscle weakness. There was no documented evidence of left hand/wrist contractures on admission. A plan of care, dated 09/15/21 revealed Resident #7 required activity of daily living assistance for personal care. The care plan revealed physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy were to evaluate and treat resident as needed. Review of Resident #7's Nursing admission Evaluation Part 2 document, dated 09/16/21, revealed Resident #7 had limited range of motion (ROM) to the left lower extremity (LLE). There was no documented evidence of limited ROM to the left upper extremity. Review of Resident #7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/22/21 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, policy review, and review of narcotic log the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication and insulin were administered by a licensed qualified staff member. This affected two residents (#18, #64) of 32 residents who had narcotic and/or insulin orders. The census was 71. Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, asthma, dysphagia, peripheral vascular disease, lymphedema, cognitive impairment, restless leg syndrome, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/11/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14. Record review of Resident #18's orders revealed an order placed on 04/28/25 for hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 milligram (mg), give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for severe pain. Review of Resident #18's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline plan of care related to Resident #116's orthotic splint. This affected one resident (#116) of 19 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an initial admission date of 01/19/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to osteoarthritis right wrist, osteonecrosis of right carpus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, Kienbock's disease of adults, major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence with withdrawal delirium, altered mental status, confusional arousals, anxiety disorder, Wernicke's encephalopathy, repeated falls, anemia, abnormal weight loss, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, disorders of plasma protein metabolism, metabolic acidosis, seasonal allergic rhinitis, hypertension and allergy to mammalian meats. Review of the plan of care dated 01/20/25 revealed the resident is at risk for impaired skin integrity related to splint to right hand. Interventions included administer medications as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to review and revise two residents (#5, #46) in the area of activities of daily living (ADL) and palliative care. This affected two residents (#5, #46) of 19 sampled residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an initial admission date of 02/14/20 with the latest readmission of 12/26/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with right sided hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), aphasia, mild intellectual disabilities, dysphagia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, vertigo, protein calorie malnutrition, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, osteoporosis, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease, cerebellar ataxia, hypertension, malignant neoplasm of prostate, solitary pulmonary nodule, dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia, alcohol abuse and nicotine dependence. Review of the plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide ensure one resident (#24) who was dependent on staff assistance with nail care as physician ordered. This affected one resident (#24) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an initial admission date of 04/23/23 with the latest readmission of 12/05/24 with the diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, polyneuropathy, spondylosis, disease of pancreas, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, disorders of urethra, obstructive and reflux uropathy, noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen, calculus of kidney, congestive heart failure, dysphagia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, chronic pain syndrome, insomnia, major depressive disorder, basal cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified eyelid, acanthosis nigricans,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#46) received routine palliative care visits. Additionally, the facility failed to monitor one resident's (#116) orthotic splint causing increased edema. This affected two residents (#46, #116) of 19 sampled residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an initial admission date of 03/08/23 with the latest readmission of 04/02/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure, severe morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, depression, diabetes mellitus, pain in foot, sleep disorder, liver disease, fatty liver and gout. Review of the plan of care dated 10/17/23 revealed the resident had a terminal prognosis with admit to Compass Palliative Care with diagnoses of COPD. Interventions included administer medications as ordered and observe for effectiveness, Allow resident to express fears and concerns related to terminal diagnosis, notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents (#24, #50) were provided routine podiatry services. This affected two residents (#24, #50) of three residents review for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an initial admission date of 04/23/23 with the latest readmission of 12/05/24 with the diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, polyneuropathy, spondylosis, disease of pancreas, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, disorders of urethra, obstructive and reflux uropathy, noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen, calculus of kidney, congestive heart failure, dysphagia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, chronic pain syndrome, insomnia, major depressive disorder, basal cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified eyelid, acanthosis nigricans, hypothyroidism and hyperlipidemia.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented for residents with a history of falls and another resident known to have non-pressure skin injuries had a footboard padded as per their plan of care. This affected three residents (#29, #37, and #50) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, unspecified psychosis, schizo-affective disorder, age-related cognitive decline, unsteadiness on her feet, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and her cognition was moderately impaired. Hallucinations and delusions were noted. The resident had other behaviors director at others…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to address a pharmacy recommendation timely for one resident (#24). Additionally, the physician failed to provide a rationale for the decline of a pharmacy recommended gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Resident #5. This affected two residents (#5, #24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an initial admission date of 02/14/20 with the latest readmission of 12/26/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with right sided hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), aphasia, mild intellectual disabilities, dysphagia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, vertigo, protein calorie malnutrition, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, osteoporosis, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease, cerebellar ataxia, hypertension, malignant neoplasm of prostate, solitary pulmonary nodule, dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory testing for one resident (#45) of five sampled for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/22/22 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, Crohn's disease, dementia, delusional disorders, hallucinations, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 03 indicating a severe cognitive deficit. Further review revealed Resident #45 had hallucinations in the seven days prior to the MDS date of 10/29/24. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #45 had received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications in the seven days prior to the MDS date of 10/29/24. Review of the pharmacy recommendation note to attending physician/prescriber dated 07/25/24 revealed Resident #45 was receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a resident's advance directives. This affected one of 24 sampled residents (#7). The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. The resident was out to the hospital from [DATE] to [DATE]. The resident was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of physician's orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for do not resuscitate in the event of cardiac arrest. However, review of a binder at the nurses station titled code status revealed a paper dated [DATE] which was signed by Resident #7 expressing a desire to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) be done in the event of cardiac arrest. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)# 100 on [DATE] at 2:45 P.M. revealed that she puts the code status information in the binder at the nurses station for reference by the nurses. She confirmed the paper in the binder desiring CPR be done for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in resident rooms. This affected two residents (#18 and #55) of four residents reviewed for homelike environment. The census was 65. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, schizoaffective disorder, major depression, and acute kidney failure. Observation on 11/29/23 at 10:44 A.M. revealed Resident #18 in his room. The bathroom door in his room had three holes on the bottom, each approximately the size of a golf ball. Interview on 11/29/23 at 10:46 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #145 confirmed the holes in Resident #18's bathroom door. During the course of the annual survey, Resident #18 was not available for interview. 2. Record review revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately in the area of gradual dose reduction attempts being completed when on an antipsychotic medication and the use of personal alarms and wander guards. This affected two residents (#18 and #36) of 23 residents reviewed for assessments. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #18's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder and major depressive disorder. A review of a pharmacy recommendation for Resident #18 dated 06/27/23 revealed the pharmacist had recommended a gradual dose reduction (GDR) attempt for the use of Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication). The pharmacist indicated the resident had been on 25 milligrams (mg) twice a day since October 2021. The nurse practitioner responding to the recommendation agreed to the recommendation and reduced the dose of the Seroquel from 25 mg twice a day to 12.5 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a new resident review completed after a newly diagnosed mental illness was added to their diagnoses. This affected two residents (#12 and #43) of two residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #43's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder and depression at the time of his admission. His diagnoses list was updated to reflect an added diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder (type of schizophrenia that also included a mood disorder component) on 12/14/21. A review of Resident #43's PASARR Identification Screen dated 10/26/21 that was completed within 30 days of his admission revealed it was being completed as part of his pre-admission screen (PAS) and was an out of state PAS. Section (E.) Indications of Serious Mental Illness documented any known…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, policy review, the facility failed to ensure a residents care plan properly reflected a resident's code status. This affected one resident (#67) of the 23 residents reviewed for accurate care planning. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included COVID-19, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral infarction and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #67's code status document dated [DATE] revealed a completed and signed document indicating Resident #67 wished to be a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR), Comfort Care, Arrest (CCA) DNR-CCA indicating the provider will treat resident as any other without a DNR order until the point of cardiac or respiratory arrest at which point all interventions will cease and the DNR Comfort Care protocol will be implemented. Review of Resident #67's orders for [DATE] revealed a code status order for DNR-CCA with an original…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain ordered weekly weights for nutritional support monitoring. This affected one resident (#15) of the two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an initial admission date of 08/09/11 and a re-entry date of 05/26/23. Diagnoses included dementia, dysphasia, muscle weakness, and impaired renal tubular function. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #15 was noted to be independent with set up only for eating and was noted to weigh 157 pounds. Review of Resident #15's dietary progress note dated 11/08/23 at 12:27 P.M. created by Dietitian #500 revealed a recommendation for weekly weights due to weight decline. Review of Resident #15's orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving supplemental oxygen had a physician's order to administer oxygen and a physician's order to specify the flow rate in which it was to be received. This affected one resident (#16) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: A review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified asthma, and personal history of Covid-19. A review of Resident #16's active care plans revealed he had impaired pulmonary/ respiratory status related to COPD. The care plan was initiated on 09/26/23. Interventions included administering medications and treatments as ordered. The care plan did not specifically indicate the use of supplemental oxygen as one of the interventions implemented. A review of Resident #16's physician's orders revealed the resident did not have an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure as needed antipsychotic medication had an appropriate diagnosis for use and was not administered to residents prior to attempting nonpharmacologic interventions. This affected one resident (#36) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 65. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, type II diabetes, Crohn's disease, depression, hypertension, dementia, aortic valve stenosis, anxiety disorder, dementia with behaviors, dysphagia, insomnia, atherosclerotic heart disease without angina, fibromyalgia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of orders revealed Resident #36 had orders in place for a mood stabilizer, depakote 250 milligrams (mg), and an anti-anxiety medication, ativan 0.5 mg. Review of quarterly minimum data set (MDS) from 10/11/23 revealed Resident #36 had impaired cognition and physical behaviors four to six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility failed to ensure a resident received an antibiotic for an appropriate diagnosis. This affected one resident (#223) of six residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 65. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), paraplegia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, type II diabetes, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, dysphagia, insomnia, flaccid neuropathic bladder, emphysema, and atrial fibrillation. Review of progress notes revealed Resident #223 was seen by Medical Director (MD) on 06/26/23 for a regulatory visit. MD stated Resident #223 had complaints of being short of breath with movement, is oxygen dependent at baseline, and has a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During the visit, Resident #223's vitals were stable, had no congestion, and respiratory system was diminished to bilateral lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #4, a male resident who displayed inappropriate sexual behaviors prior to admission to the facility was not placed in a room with a bathroom that adjoined to another room where a female resident, Resident #74 resided. This affected two residents (#4 and #74) of the three residents reviewed for appropriate care planning. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an initial admission date of 06/22/23 and a re-entry date of 09/29/23. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder current, dementia with behavioral disturbances and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #4 was noted to be independent no set up assistance required for for bed mobility, walk in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, self-reported incident review, staff interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse in a timely manner and to the appropriate State agency. This affected one resident (#74) of three residents reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of a facility self-reported incident, tracking number 238948 dated 09/07/23 revealed an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the State agency. Time and location of occurrence was noted to be 08/24/23 in residents room. Narrative of the incident included, Allegation of sexual abuse. Resident #74 states that male resident, Resident #4 exposed himself and asked her to kiss it or he would break her arm. Staff reported both residents were in females' room, Resident #74's room with the door closed. Both residents were fully clothed during this time. Resident #4 was sitting on the bed and Resident #74 was next to the door in a wheelchair. No report of residents making contact just verbal remarks. Initially on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, this facility failed to develop a comprehensive person centered care plan to reflect behaviors including inappropriate sexual behaviors. This affected one resident (#4) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an initial admission date of 06/22/23 and a re-entry date of 09/29/23. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder current, dementia with behavioral disturbances and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #4 was noted to be independent no set up assistance required for for bed mobility, walk in and out of room, locomotion on and off the unit. Resident #4 was noted to be free of any impairment to the bilateral upper or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the narcotic contingency box and refrigerated contingency narcotics were reconciled each shift and failed to ensure accurate count of Ativan. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents. Findings include: Observation on 04/05/22 at 10:14 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #860 revealed there was plastic narcotic contingency box sitting on the counter that contained 196 controlled narcotics per the control drug disposition and audit record dated 04/01/22. The box was not double locked and was attached to the bottom of on upper cabinet with a small (1/16) wire that could have been easily cut. Further observation of refrigerated contingency narcotic revealed there was six one milliliter (ml) injectable Ativan's in the unlocked plastic box in the unlocked refrigerator. There was no evidence of Ativan Intensol (oral) per the control drug disposition and audit record. Review of the control drug disposition and audit record dated 04/01/22 revealed no evidence of the lock numbers or evidence the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were packaged, labeled, and stored properly. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation on 04/05/22 at 10:14 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #860 revealed there was a plastic narcotic contingency box sitting on the counter that contained 196 controlled narcotics per the control drug disposition and audit record dated 04/01/22. The box was not double locked and was attached to the bottom of on upper cabinet with a small (1/16) wire that could have been easily cut. Further observation of refrigerated contingency narcotic revealed there was six one milliliter (ml) injectable Ativan's in the unlocked plastic box in the unlocked refrigerator. Interview on 04/05/22 at 10:25 A.M., with LPN #860 during the observation verified the Ativan was not double locked in the refrigerator, nor was the contingency box double locked in a fixed compartment. Review of the facilities policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-13 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) sign-in sheets and staff interview the facility failed to hold quarterly meetings with the attendance of the Administrator, the Medical Director, and Director of Nursing (DON). This had the potential to affect all 74 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Review of QAA sign-in sheets from 04/16/2021 to 03/03/2022 revealed the second quarter of 2021 revealed no meeting was held that included all the required members: the 04/16/21 meeting the DON was not in attendance, the May 2021 meeting neither the Administrator or the DON were in attendance, and the June 2021 meeting neither the Administrator nor the Medical Director were in attendance. Review of third quarter of 2021 revealed no meeting was held that included all the required members: the July 2021 meeting neither the Administrator nor Medical Director were in attendance, the August 2021 meeting revealed the DON was not in attendance, and September 2021 the Director of Nursing was not in attendance. There were no sign-in sheets available for review for October…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-13 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident medical records contained comprehensive and specific documentation pertaining to the circumstances of transfers and failed to ensure required information was provided to the receiving provider for all residents at the time of transfer/hospitalization. This affected four residents (#47, #73, #74 and #57) of five residents reviewed for transfers/hospitalizations. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an initial admission date of 12/30/21 and a readmission date of 03/08/22. Resident #73 had diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, diastolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Stage III chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypothyroidism, chronic pain syndrome, cervical radiculopathy, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer and inflammation of the left lower extremity, pain in the left leg,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-13 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents, their responsible parties and/or the Ombudsman were notified of resident transfers/discharges as required. This affected four residents(#64, #47, #74 and #57) of five residents reviewed for transfer/discharge/hospitalizations. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 02/06/20 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, type II diabetes mellitus (DM2) with neuropathy, encounter for palliative care, lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), mild cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/01/22 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition with the a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. Review of a progress note, dated 11/11/2021…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-13 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were accurate and/or resubmitted after change of diagnoses that required Level II review. This affected four (Resident #43, #46, #49, and #71) of five reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 02/03/20 psychosis was added to the diagnoses list, 06/16/20 schizoaffective disorder was added to the diagnoses list, and on 12/13/20 major depression was added to the diagnoses list. Review of Resident #43 last PASARR dated 12/14/15 revealed no evidence the resident had any mental illness and did not qualify for level two services. Review of Resident #43's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not currently considered by the state Level II PASARR process to have serious mental illness and or/or intellectual disability or related condition. Review of Resident #43's orders and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to care plan Oxygen therapy and restorative therapy. This affected three (#71, #41, and #59) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 03/04/22. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), emphysema, schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, mood disorder due to known physiological conditions with mixed features, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/04/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (no impairment) and no behaviors. The resident was independent or required supervision for all Activities of daily Living (ADL's). Further Review of the MDS assessment revealed the resident did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure interventions were timely implemented to prevent significant weight loss and residents were provided with accurate nutritional assessments and care plans. This affected three residents (#1, #7, and #57) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 74. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #7's weights revealed on 01/05/2022, the resident weighed 223.0 pounds (lbs.) and on 01/19/2022, the resident weighed 207.8 pounds. This was a 6.82% weight loss in two weeks. Resident #7 lost over 5% of her weight in a two-week period. She then continued to lose weight as noted with a weight of 203.4 lbs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to store and change respiratory tubing per facility policy. This affected four (#47, #71, #325, and #73) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 03/04/22. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), emphysema, schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, mood disorder due to known physiological conditions with mixed features, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/04/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (no impairment) and no behaviors. The resident was independent or required supervision for all Activities of daily Living (ADL's). Further review of the MDS assessment revealed the resident did not receive Oxygen services but did have a COPD diagnosis. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, review of glucometer disinfecting guidelines, review of Sani-Cloth (germicidal disposable wipe) instructions, and policy review the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter tubing was maintained to prevent contamination and failed to ensure multiple use glucometers were disinfected properly to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. This affected one (Resident #36) of one reviewed for urinary catheter and had the potential to affect all 19 residents (Resident's #63, #60, #35, #62, #5, #33, #12, #43, #20, #46, #16, #7, #73, #57, #21, #324, #47, #40, and #22) that the facility had identified as receiving blood glucose monitoring with the facilities glucometers. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/05/22 at 5:13 P.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #860 revealed the LPN had two glucometers lying on the top of the medication cart. One glucometer was wrapped in a Sani-Cloth bleach wipe and the other one was uncovered. LPN #860 performed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's code status book, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #62's code status was consistent between what was identified in the medical record and what the advanced directives indicated the code status to be in the facility's code status book maintained on the unit. This affected one resident (#62) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: A review of Resident #62's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #62 had diagnoses including a history of a stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) affecting the right dominant side, adult onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension and history of a myocardial infarction (heart attack). A review of Resident #62's physician's orders revealed his advance directives/code status was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A). The order had been in place since 02/18/22. A review of the facility's code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the advance beneficiary notices, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their responsible parties received the appropriate advance beneficiary notices when cut from Medicare (MCR) Part A services. This affected two resident (#225 and #226) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's list of residents who received a liability notice in the past six months revealed Resident #225 was cut from MCR Part A services on 01/20/22. The resident was identified as having remained in the facility after her skilled service had ended. The facility was not able to provide documented evidence of Resident #225 and/or the resident's representative receiving the required notice of the resident's skilled service ending. The facility could not find the CMS Form 10123 (Notice of MCR Non-Coverage) or CMS Form 10055 (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice) that should have been provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative when the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #73 and Resident #22 were provided privacy in their shared room. Observations on 04/04/22 and 04/05/22 revealed no privacy curtain or privacy devices were in the resident's room to ensure the visual privacy of both residents. This affected two residents (#73 and #22) of two residents observed for privacy curtains. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/20/20 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis or the right middle cerebral artery, chronic atrial fibrillation, type II diabetes mellitus (DM2), hypertension (HTN), hypomagnesemia, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, anemia, restless leg syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (GERD) and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/19/22 revealed Resident #22 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 of 15 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #59 was free from an incident of verbal abuse. This affected one resident (#59) of two residents reviewed for resident to resident altercations. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia C5-C7, convulsions, neurogenic, bowel, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder, with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, hearing loss, impacted teeth and hypokalemia. Review of Resident #59's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/30/2021 revealed the resident had clear speech, understands others, made self-understood and her cognition was intact. Resident #59 had minimum depression, no indicators of psychosis, no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #59 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, was dependent on two staff to transfer,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of personal funds statements, interview and policy review the facility failed to prevent an incident of misappropriation of personal funds for Resident #43. This affected one resident (#43) of one reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes, amputation of left leg below knee and amputation of right leg above knee. Review of Resident #43's quarterly Minimums Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/14/22 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. Review of Resident #43's personal funds statements dated 01/2022 to 04/05/22 revealed the resident withdrew $50.00 cash on 01/06/22 and 02/17/22, $25.00 on 03/15/22, $45.00 on 03/21/22, and $30.00 on 04/05/22. On 04/05/22 at 8:47 A.M. interview with Resident #43 revealed he was missing $58.00, which he kept in a small plastic box. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure all alleged incidents of abuse and/or misappropriation were immediately reported to the Administrator and/or to the State agency as required. This affected two residents (#43 and #59) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes, amputation of left leg below knee and amputation of right leg above knee. Review of Resident #43's quarterly Minimums Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/14/22 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. Review of Resident #43's personal funds statements dated 01/2022 to 04/05/22 revealed the resident withdrew $50.00 cash on 01/06/22 and 02/17/22, $25.00 on 03/15/22, $45.00 on 03/21/22, and $30.00 on 04/05/22. On 04/05/22 at 8:47 A.M. interview with Resident #43 revealed he was missing $58.00,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse and misappropriation were thoroughly and timely investigated. This affected three residents (#12, #43 and #59) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes, amputation of left leg below knee and amputation of right leg above knee. Review of Resident #43's quarterly Minimums Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/14/22 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. Review of Resident #43's personal funds statements dated 01/2022 to 04/05/22 revealed the resident withdrew $50.00 cash on 01/06/22 and 02/17/22, $25.00 on 03/15/22, $45.00 on 03/21/22, and $30.00 on 04/05/22. On 04/05/22 at 8:47 A.M. interview with Resident #43 revealed he was missing $58.00, which he kept in a small plastic box.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents assessments were accurate with regard to pressure injuries, life expectancy, and functional range of motion. This affected two of 23 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #43) whose assessments were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute and chronic respiratory failure, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, morbid obesity, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and anemia. Review of Resident #1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #1 had no speech, rarely/never was understood, rarely/never understands, and he had no recall. Resident #1's life expectancy was not six months or less and was on hospice. Resident #1 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/ or their resident representative were invited to attend quarterly care planning conferences to be a part of the resident's care planning process. This affected one (Resident #5) of one residents reviewed for care planning conferences. Findings include: A review of Resident #5's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, personality disorder, schizo-affective disorder, major depressive disorder, difficulty walking and need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident #5's profile in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed the resident was identified as her own responsible party for financial and clinical. No other people were identified as her emergency contact. A review of Resident #5's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented per therapy recommendation and failed to assess and implement new intervention to maintain resident's ability to eat without physical assistance. This affected one Resident (#7) of 11 residents reviewed for decline in activity of daily living. The facility census was 74. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, and generalized muscle weakness. There was no documented evidence of left hand/wrist contractures. Review of Resident #7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was moderately cognitively impaired and was eating with supervision with one person physically assisting. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided showers per their preference. This affected nine Residents (#5, #31, #36, #41, #62, #64, #66, #73, and #424) of 11 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 74. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), cervical disc disorder, seizures, and syncope and collapse. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. She required one person to physically assist with bathing activity and that the ability to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath was somewhat important to her. Review of the facility's shower schedule, undated, revealed Resident #31 was to have two showers a week. Review of Resident #31's shower documentation, dated 02/2022 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, facility policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure communication between the facility and the hospice provider in order to provide continuity of care for the resident. This affected one of two residents reviewed who received hospice services (Resident #1). The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute and chronic respiratory failure, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, morbid obesity, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and anemia. Review of Resident #1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #1 had no speech, rarely/never was understood, rarely/never understands, and he had no recall. Resident #1 had no indicators of psychosis, and no behaviors were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review, and interview the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services for the care of pressure ulcers. This affected two residents (#1 and #73) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an initial admission date of 12/30/21 and a readmission date of 03/08/22. Resident #73 had diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, diastolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Stage III chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypothyroidism, chronic pain syndrome, cervical radiculopathy, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer and inflammation of the left lower extremity, pain in the left leg, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus (DM2), major depressive disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and anxiety disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to implement ordered fall interventions. This affected one (#22) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/20/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis or the right middle cerebral artery, chronic atrial fibrillation, type II diabetes mellitus (DM2), hypertension (HTN), hypomagnesemia, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, anemia, restless leg syndrome, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (GERD), and hyperlipidemia. Review of the physician order dated 08/11/21, revealed the resident was to have mats next to her bed due to recent falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/19/22, revealed the resident had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 (moderate impairment) and no documented behaviors. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to label/date an intermittently ran tube feeding bottle. This affected one (#51) of three residents who received enteral feedings. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 02/28/11. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gastrostomy, and alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/23/22, revealed the resident had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 (severe impairment) and no noted behaviors. The resident required total assistance of one staff member for eating. He required extensive to total assistance of one to two or more staff members for all Activities of daily Living (ADL's). Review of the plan of care dated 01/11/22 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary mental health treatment to maintain the resident's highest mental health status. This affected one resident (Resident #25) of two residents reviewed for behavioral health needs. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, single episode, and mental disorder. Review of Resident #25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was mildly cognitively impaired with a mood interview score of 05 (mild depression). The resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively intact with a mood interview score of 00 (no depression). Review of Resident #25's orders, dated 10/01/22, revealed mental health medication orders for Venlafaxine HCL Extended Release 150 milligram (mg) capsule one time a day for depression, Bupropion HCL Extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor and treat psychotropic medication side effect/adverse reactions. This affected one (Resident #73) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an initial admission date of 12/30/21 and a readmission date of 03/08/22. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the left lower limb, diastolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Stage III chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypothyroidism, chronic pain syndrome, cervical radiculopathy, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer and inflammation of the left lower extremity, pain in the left leg, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus (DM2), major depressive disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and anxiety disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/14/22, revealed Resident #73 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the infection and antibiotic stewardship program, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents met criteria of antibiotic treatment. This affected one (Resident #47) of five residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation, paraplegia, diabetes, emphysema, and history of COVID-19 on 02/09/22. Review of Resident #47's hospital records dated 12/18/21 revealed the resident's principal diagnoses was hypoxia and secondary was acute exacerbation of COPD. Resident #47 was provided instructions on atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, and booster injection for COVID-19. Review of Resident #47 nursing progress note dated 12/14/21 revealed the hospital reported the resident was admitted to intensive care and was on antibiotics for a urinary tract infection (UTI). Further of Resident #47 discharge prescriptions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolated
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes, staff interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was not up to date on COVID-19 vaccination was tested between the fifth or seventh day after admission. This affected one (Resident #124) of one resident reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #124's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/25/22 with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, chronic kidney, obstructive reflux, anemia, chronic congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, and urinary retention. Resident #124 was placed on quarantine upon admission as he was not up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations. Interview of the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/04/22 at 7:10 A.M. revealed Resident #124 was on transmission-based precautions because he was a newly admitted and was not up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations. Observation of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was functional. This affected one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for call light function. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cervical disc disorder, seizures, and syncope and collapse. Review of Resident #31's care plan dated 01/19/22 revealed she should have the call light within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance as needed. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and could walk in her room or in the corridor independently without physical assistance from staff. Interview on 04/04/22 at 8:20 P.M. with Resident #31 revealed her call light was not working. Resident #31 reported the call light had not been working for a while since she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review transfer notices, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the local Ombudsman was notified of resident transfers as required. This affected two residents (#57 and #65) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, history of a tracheostomy (removed), seizures, adult onset diabetes mellitus, heart failure and cerebellar stroke disorder. Review of Resident #57's census tab and Minimum Data Set assessments under the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and did not return to the facility until 12/10/24. Review of Resident #57's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated 11/30/24 at 8:57 P.M. that indicated the resident was transferred from the facility via local emergency medical services (EMS). The progress note did not specify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$52,231 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $37,551 — penalty dated 2025-07-03
  • $14,680 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-28 for 40 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARBORS AT OHIO — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
NOBLE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$499K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 6%Other / private 25%

This home reported $499K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$277per resident / day
operating cost
$8,429per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$258per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365450. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next