Senior Village Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 44.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physicain's orders were followed as ordered for one (#32) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The Administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #32 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of COPD, depression, and diabetes. A physician's order, dated 06/28/24, documented Oxygen 5 liters via NC if O2 sats are less than 90%. On 07/29/24 at 9:27 a.m., the resident was observed resting in bed with eyes closed. Oxygen settings were observd at 7 L/M with a nasal canula. On 07/30/24 at 12:25 p.m., the resident was observed wearing their oxygen. Oxygen settings were at 7 L/M via NC. On 07/31/24 at 9:32 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in their room watching tv. The resident was observed wearing oxygen with the setting at 7L/M via NC. On 08/01/24 at 10:00 a.m., the DON was made aware of the observations. The DON reported the physician's orders were not being followed.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review andinterview, the facility failed to ensure yearly nursing skill and competencies were completed for three (LPN #1, LPN #2, and RN #1) of the seven employees reviewed. The Adminstrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/01/24 at 9:21 a.m., the skills and competencies for licensed nurses were reviewed. Three licensed nurse skills review had not been completed for , LPN #1, LPN #2, and RN #1, since 2022. On 08/01/24 at 11:44 a.m., the DON reported she did not realize the yearly skills and competencies had not been completed for the three licensed nurses.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to follow/implement the Preparation for Medication Administration policy for one (#2) of four sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The Administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #2 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes, anxiety, and depression. An Incident Report, dated 04/04/24, documented the resident received another resident's medication. On 07/31/24 at 10:46 a.m., the facility's policy for Preparation for Medication Administration was reviewed. The Preparation for Medication Administration Policy, last revised 12/01/12, documented, Preparation- Prior to administration, the medication and dosage schedule on the resident's MAR is compared with the medication label. Administration- Residents are identified before medication is administered. The medication nurse or certified medication aide will turn to that resident's medication sheet, compare photo with resident and positively identify the resident. Each resident must have a completed Resident Information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN order for an antianxiety had a 14 day stop date for one (#3) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #3 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia in other diseases with mild anxiety. A physician's order, dated 6/24/24, documented, Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML (Lorazepam) *Controlled Drug* Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for ANXIETY/RESTLESSNESS, no stop date provided on the order. A Medication Regimen Review, dated 1/18/24, documented a request for physician to add a stop date. The physician signed the request with no response documented and no stop date was added to the Lorazepam. On 08/01/24 at 9:56 a.m., the DON reported the medication should have had a stop date added.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a new mental health diagnosis to OHCA for a PASRR level II evaluation for one (#3) of one sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. The Administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #3 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes, dementia, depression, and hypothyroidism. A review of the resident's record documented a PASRR level I was completed on 04/27/23. On 12/26/23, the resident received a new diagnosis of psychosis. The resident's record contained no documentation that OHCA was notified of the new mental health diagnosis. On 08/01/24 at 9:58 a.m., the DON reported that OHCA was not notified of the new mental health diagnosis.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were were free from unnecessary drugs related to inadequate monitoring for three (#2, #3, and #28) of seven residents whose medications were reviewed. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #3's physician order, dated 12/21/21, documented to administer lisinopril 10 mg in the afternoon for a diagnosis of hypertension. The order documented to hold the medication if the resident's SBP was less than 100 or the DBP was less than 60. Physician orders, dated 01/15/22, documented to administer hydralazine 25 mg two times a day and metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg two times a day for a diagnosis of hypertension. The order documented to hold the medications if the resident's SBP was less than 100 or the DBP was less than 60. On 04/21/22 at 4:08 p.m., CMA #1 was observed, during medication pass, to administer the blood pressure medications, lisinopril, metoprolol, and hydralazine, without obtaining a blood pressure reading.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% for two residents (#2 and #3) of six residents observed during medication pass. A total of 25 opportunities were observed with two errors. Total error rate was 8%. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #3's physician order, dated 12/21/21, documented to administer lisinopril 10 mg in the afternoon for a diagnosis of hypertension. The order documented to hold the medication if the resident's SBP was less than 100 or the DBP was less than 60. Physician orders, dated 01/15/22, documented to administer hydralazine 25 mg two times a day and metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg two times a day for a diagnosis of hypertension. The order documented to hold the medications if the resident's SBP was less than 100 or the DBP was less than 60. On 04/21/22 at 4:08 p.m., CMA #1 was observed, during medication pass, to administer the blood pressure medications, lisinopril, metoprolol, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered lab services were obtained for one (#19) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 39 residents lived in the facility. Findings: Res #19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, hyperlipidemia, hyperkalemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, and hyperglycemia. A physician order, dated 2/15/22, documented the facility was to obtain a CBC, CMP, BNP, TSH, and T4. A care plan, dated 3/18/22, documented the facility was to obtain labs and x-rays as ordered and report significant findings to the physician. The care plan documented the labs required for the resident were CBC, CMP, TSH, and T4, every six months in March and September. A physician order, dated 3/28/22, documented the facility was to obtain a CBC, CMP, TSH, and T4 every six months starting on the 28th. On 4/25/22 at 11:55 a.m., the DON stated the procedure for lab draws was the nurses who received the orders would place them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. The Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 39 residents lived in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/20/22 at between 4:18 p.m. and 4:23 p.m., observations of the evening meal service in the dining room was made. CNA #1 sat down to assist a resident to eat and did not perform hand hygiene. Another resident was feeding herself at the table and was using a butter knife to eat. CNA #1 replaced the butter knife with a spoon and returned to assisting the first resident to eat without performing hand hygiene. On 04/20/22 at 4:24 p.m., CNA #2 was observed to move a chair between two residents and assisted both residents with their meal without using hand hygiene between residents. On 04/20/22 at 4:25 p.m., CNA #1 touched a resident's fork, put some meat on it, and gave the fork to the resident, then continued to assist another resident she was helping eat. Hand hygiene was not observed. CNA #1 was observed to take a dirty napkin from one resident, assisted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-26 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to conduct a significant change assessment after a decline in two or more areas for one (#28) of eleven sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #28's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/15/21, documented the resident walked with limited assistance, was frequently incontinent, weighed 214 lbs, was not on a physician prescribed weight loss program. The assessment documented the resident had no wounds, no pain, and no pain medication administered. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/01/22, documented the resident did not walk, was always incontinent, weighed 159 lbs, had a significant weight loss, was not on a physician prescribed weight loss program. The assessment documented the resident had a surgical wound, occasional moderate pain, and received opioid medication seven days of seven day look-back period. On 04/26/22 at 10:36 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the resident should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $307K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK