Capitol Hill Skilled Nursing And Therapy

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 70.9 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.483 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-06-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the 2 (Dumpster #1 and Dumpster #2) of 3 dumpsters in the facility were kept covered at all times. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who currently reside in the facility.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Safe Facilities and Pest Management, specified, Make sure the containers have tight-fitting lids and are kept covered at all times. During an observation of the facility garbage receptable area on 06/15/2026 at 9:02 AM, the surveyor noted there were three dumpsters and Dumpster #1 had no side door to close the dumpster and there was opened access to the trash located in the dumpster. The surveyor noted Dumpster #2 did not have a functioning lid, it was left opened and there were flying insects in and around both Dumpster #1 and Dumpster #2. During an observation of the facility garbage receptable area on 06/16/2026 at 12:49 PM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and the Regional Dietary Consultant (RDC), the surveyor noted Dumpster #2 had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for 1 (Resident #30) of 1 sampled resident who required a specialized call light. Findings included: On 06/16/2026 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy regarding accommodation of residents' needs. A document titled, AliMed Worry-Free Pull-Cord Alarm, #72140 Instructions for Use and Care, indicated, A tug on the cord in any direction will cause magnetic sensor to release and alarm will be triggered. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #30 on 10/19/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/23/2026, revealed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed antipsychotic medication was limited to 14 days for 1 (Resident #59) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Appendix 19: Medications Requiring Behavior & Side Effect Monitoring, updated 10/25/2021, specified, PRN [pro re nata, as needed] anxiolytics can have only an initial 14 day stop date. They can be continued for longer periods of time such as 30 [days], 60 [days], or 90 [days] days as long as the prescribing physician indicates that new stop date - they cannot be continued indefinitely. Per the Appendix 19: Medications Requiring Behavior & Side Effect Monitoring, Xanax was listed as an anxiolytic medication. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #59 on 01/04/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/10/2026, revealed Resident #59…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was timely reported to the state survey agency for 1 (Resident #72) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Reports to State and Federal Agencies, revised 02/02/2018, revealed, Timeline for Reporting. All reports to the Department shall be made by telephone or facsimile. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries on unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #72 on 11/06/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of bone. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/17/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to educate the staff on the proper usage of a pull-cord alarm for 1 (Resident #30) of 1 sampled resident who required a specialized call light. Findings included: On 06/16/2026 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy regarding accommodation of residents' needs. A document titled, AliMed Worry-Free Pull-Cord Alarm, #72140 Instructions for Use and Care, indicated, A tug on the cord in any direction will cause magnetic sensor to release and alarm will be triggered. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #30 on 10/19/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/23/2026, revealed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (200 Hall medication cart) of 5 medication carts in the facility was kept locked when out of sight of the staff authorized to have access. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, effective 01/2022, indicated, Policy Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is assessable only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. The policy specified, Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access. During a concurrent interview and medication administration observation on 06/16/2026 at 7:52 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #12, being trained by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8, was observed to leave the medication cart on the 200 Hall unlocked while she administered a resident's medications in the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach of a resident for one (#20) of 24 sampled residents observed for call lights in reach. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #20 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia. Resident #20's quarterly resident assessment, dated 09/27/24, documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #20's care plan for falls, revised 10/17/24, documented call light in reach and encourage to use. On 11/06/24 at 10:41 a.m., Resident #20 called out to the surveyor and asked the surveyor to hand them their call light. The call light was on the recliner and out of the reach of the resident. Resident #20 was sitting in a wheelchair. The resident was asked how they would call for help with the call light out of their reach. Resident #20 stated, They cant. The resident stated they needed ice water. On 11/06/24 at 10:54 a.m., CNA #4 stated the policy was to ensure the call light was always in reach.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's ceiling vent was cleaned for one (#55) of three sampled residents reviewed for a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Housekeeping Policies and Procedures policy, revised 06/29/12, read in part, Weekly Procedures: Begin cleaning resident rooms from the ceiling and work toward the floor. The only part of the room which is allowed to be dry dusted is the ceiling, high vents, and other high dust areas. Resident #55's quarterly resident assessment, dated 10/18/24, documented Resident #55 was cognitively intact. On 11/06/24 at 8:56 a.m., Resident #55's ceiling vent was observed to have moderate dust build up. On 11/08/24 at 12:04 p.m., Resident #55's ceiling vent was observed to have moderate dust build up. Resident #55 stated they had not cleaned the vent. On 11/08/24 at 12:59 p.m., Housekeeper #1 stated they had not paid attention to the ceiling vents in the resident rooms during their cleaning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a MDS was coded accurately for one (#42) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. They identified one resident received dialysis. Findings: Resident #42 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. A Care Plan, dated 07/11/24, documented the resident received dialysis at a local facility three times a week. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 10/01/24, did not code Resident #42 received dialysis. On 11/07/24 at 11:01 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated if someone was receiving dialysis then it would be coded on the MDS. They reviewed Resident #42's MDS and stated it was not coded. They stated it was not accurate.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold a care plan meeting for one (#35) of one sampled resident reviewed for a care plan meeting. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #35 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and need for assistance with personal care. On 11/07/24 at 1:19 p.m., Resident Rep #1 stated a care plan meeting was scheduled for 10/24/24. They stated the facility did not inform them the reason the care plan meeting was not held and if it would be rescheduled. On 11/08/24 at 8:01 a.m., the administrator stated the social worker was responsible for care plan meetings. They stated the current social worker had been in their position for a week. The administrator stated care plan meetings were held quarterly. On 11/08/24 at 8:06 a.m., the administrator stated the last care plan meeting held for Resident #35 was on 07/25/24. They stated another meeting was scheduled for 10/24/24. On 11/08/24 at 8:08 a.m., the administrator stated the care plan meeting was not held because the social worker…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $585K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK