Claremore Skilled Nursing and Therapy

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 06/11/25, a past non-compliance situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure staff provided supervision to prevent falls from lifts. A facility reported incident, dated 03/26/25, showed Resident #2 fell while being transferred by CNA #4 using a lift. 1. Immediate Action Taken: a. A quality assurance meeting was held to initiate a plan of action. b. all lifts and slings were inspected for wear and tear. 2. Systemic Changes Implemented: a. a schedule of inspection for slings and lifts to ensure all are in good working order. 3. Education and Training: a. All direct care staff were educated on safe use of lifts and slings. An initial incident report, dated 06/03/25, showed certain injuries for Resident #1 as a result of a sling failing during a transfer. 1. Immediate Action Taken: a. A quality assurance meeting was held to initiate a plan of action. b. Inspect all slings b. Discard all old slings and order new slings. 2. Systemic Changes Implemented: a. Method of laundering slings was changed to prevent excess wear by drying. 3. Education and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to respond to concerns and recommendations of the resident council.The administrator identified 87 residents who resided at the facility.Findings: A Resident Council Response Form, dated 01/08/26, showed: a. concerns from the resident council regarding the nursing department, including slow call light response. The form directs the department head to respond in writing to the council by 01/22/26. The form does not show a written response from the DON;b. concerns from the resident council regarding the dietary department, including wanting fresh fruit and a varied menu. The form directs the department head to respond in writing to the council by 01/22/26. The form does not show a written response from the dietary department; andc. concerns from the resident council regarding the housekeeping department, including wanting labels for clothes. The form directs the department head to respond in writing to the council by 01/22/26. The form does not show a written response from the housekeeping department.A Resident Council Response…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided according to the plan of care for 3 (#9, 11, and #74) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for ADL care.The administrator reported 87 residents who resided in the facility.Findings:1. An admission assessment, dated 12/10/25, showed Res #9 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment also showed Res #9 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing.A care plan, reviewed 12/16/25, showed Res #9 required substantial staff assistance with bathing and was dependent on staff to transfer to the shower.The task portion of Res #9's EHR showed the resident was to receive showers on Monday and Thursday. The EHR also showed that Res #9 had received a shower on 02/17/26. The EHR did not show Res #9 was given a shower on 02/02/26, 02/05/26, 02/09/26, 02/12/26, 02/19/26, 02/23/26 or 02/26/26. Res #9 received one shower out of eight opportunities for February 2026.Additional documentation of showers for Res #9 was requested, but none was provided by the end of the survey.On 03/03/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents for 3 (#9, 11, and #74) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for ADL care.The administrator reported 87 residents who resided in the facility.Findings:1. An admission record, dated 07/25/24, showed Res #9 had diagnoses which included respiratory failure and chronic kidney disease.An admission assessment, dated 12/10/25, showed Res #9 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment also showed Res #9 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing.A care plan, reviewed 12/16/25, showed Res #9 required substantial staff assistance with bathing and was dependent on staff to transfer to the shower.The task portion of Res #9's EHR showed the resident was to receive showers on Monday and Thursday. The EHR also showed that Res #9 had received a shower on 02/17/25. The shower on 02/17/25 was the only shower documented between 02/01/26 and 03/03/26.On 03/03/26 at 1:45 p.m., CNA #4 stated on 03/02/26 they were responsible to give Res #9 a bath, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff: a. served food in a manner to reduce the risk of cross contamination; b. kept the kitchen clean; c. wore hair and beard restraints when in the food preparation area; and d. discarded leftover food per facility policy during 1 of 2 kitchen observations. The dietary manager identified 87 residents received meals prepared by the kitchen. Findings: On 03/01/26 at 10:14 a.m., dietary aide #1 was observed standing by the stove in the kitchen. Dietary aide #1 had a beard and was not wearing a hair restraint or a beard guard. On 03/01/26 at 10:17 a.m., the deep fryer was observed to have dark grease and food particles floating in the grease and piled on the outer edges. On 03/01/26 at 10:22 a.m., a steam table pan labeled sausage was observed in the refrigerator and dated 02/26. On 03/01/26 at 10:28 a.m., there was a thick black substance observed around the wheels of the oven, and a brown substance had dripped down the outside of the stove. A tater tot was observed under the stove. A facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care plan meetings were held for 1 (#1) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The administrator identified 87 residents residing in the facility findings.Findings:An admission assessment, dated 07/03/25, showed Res #1 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. It further showed the resident had a BIMS score of 13 which indicated intact cognitive functioning.A review of Res #1's EHR showed a comprehensive care plan meeting had occurred on 07/11/25. No other care-plan meetings notes were found in the resident's EHR.On 03/01/26 at 11:36 a.m., Res #1 stated they did not recall attending any care plan meetings.On 03/03/26 at 10:34 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated they were assigned to conduct the care plan meetings for the long-term care residents at the facility. They stated they had not known they were supposed to have quarterly care plan meetings with the residents or their representatives. They stated the only care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for 2 (#2 and #4) of 4 sampled residents who were reviewed for activities of daily living. The administrator identified 85 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. A significant change assessment for Resident #2, dated 04/03/25, showed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 7, which indicated they were moderately impaired for daily decision making. The assessment showed Resident #2 was dependent for showers. Task flow sheets for showers in April, May, and June of 2025 showed Resident #2 was to receive showers twice a week. The flow sheet for April 2025 showed one shower was given on 04/15/25 out of nine opportunities for showers. The flow sheet for May 2025 showed four showers were given on 05/07/25, 05/23/25, 05/28/25, and 05/30/25 out of nine opportunities in the month for showers. The flow sheet for June showed no showers had been given as of 06/10/25. On 06/10/25 at 12:38 p.m., Resident #2 stated they had only get one shower a week. 2. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/13/25, showed Resident #4 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identifed 85 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A undated facility policy titled Resident Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, read in part, The administrator and or facility designee will report all allegations to the QAPI committee. The QA committee will monitor for compliance.A member of the administrative staff will then conduct a thorough investigation of the incident/allegation to obtain information about the incident and complete ODH-283 [Oklahoma Department of Health]. An undated Transfer/Discharge Report documented the resident had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, chronic pain, anxiety disorder, and persistent mood disorders. A discharge return anticipated assessment, dated 12/01/24, did not show a BIMS for the resident. The assessment showed the resident was independent for daily decision making. An OSDH incident report, dated 12/17/24, showed an allegation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two (#58 and #7) of two residents/representatives reviewed for care plans, were involved in the care planning process. The administrator identified 80 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #58 admitted with diagnoses which included anxiety. On 06/25/24 at 8:32 a.m., Resident #58 stated they did not know when the care plan meetings were held. Review of progress notes revealed, no notes concerning care plan meetings. On 06/27/24 at 10:41 a.m., the MDS Coordinator stated they conducted the care plan meetings and invited the resident and resident representatives. They stated the invitations were not documented, however the representative for Resident #58 came. The MDS Coordinator stated they did not believe it was documented. On 06/27/24 at 10:59 a.m., the MDS Coordinator returned and stated they did not have anything the representative for Resident #58 had signed to indicate they had attended the care plan meeting. 2. Resident #7 was admitted with diagnoses which included hypertension,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide showers for four (Resident #7, 21, 33, and Resident #37) of four sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for ADL care to dependent residents. The facility Administrator identified 80 residents. Findings: A facility policy, effective date 10/01/01, documented showering was important because it rid the body of surface dirt, eliminated body odors, stimulated circulation, and provided an opportunity to inspect the resident's skin for any abnormalities or breakdown. A quality improvement report, dated 04/01/24, documented the facility identified showers as a problem and suggested they dedicate one to two staff to provide showers. 1. Resident #7 was admitted with diagnoses which included hypertension, depression, and over-active bladder. The care plan, revised 03/25/24, documented the resident required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathing. The quarterly assessment, dated 06/07/24, documented the resident was mildly impaired in cognition and required partial/moderate assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to ensure lab work was completed as ordered for two (#39 and #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator reported the census in the facility was 80. Findings: 1. Resident #39 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and hypertension. A physician's order, dated 02/16/24, documented to repeat a lipid level in 3 months, April 2024. A review of Resident #39 records did not document a lipid level had been collected in April of 2024. On 06/27/24 at 2:40 pm, The ADON stated that the lab had not been completed in April of 2024. They also stated the lab had been completed on 06/27/24 and the results had been addressed by the physician. On 06/28/24 at 12:41 pm, The DON stated the ADON was responsible for ensuring lab work was completed as ordered. 2. Resident #33 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation and an unspecified coagulation defect. A laboratory report, dated 01.25.24, documented the resident had a critical low potassium level of 2.7 mEq/L (normal range 3.5-5.1 mEq/L). On the laboratory report was a hand written…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $599K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK