The Commons

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 158 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 91.1 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly; failed to ensure staff utilized facial hair restraint/covers when preparing, distributing, and serving food during 2 of 2 meal preparation observations; and failed to ensure staff washed/sanitized their hands when serving meals to residents during 1 of 1 meal service observations. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the facility kitchen, and all residents who received staff assistance with meals in the dining room.Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Dining Services Policies and Procedures Receiving Food and Supplies, revised 06/25/2012, indicated, Food items will be received and handled in accordance with established sanitary practices. The policy further indicated, 7. All foodstuffs are to be dated. During a concurrent initial tour of the kitchen and interview on 06/01/2026 at 10:30 AM, an observation of the walk-in freezer revealed frozen chicken in a stainless-steel pan covered with clear plastic wrap and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medication, failed to obtain a physician's order for self-administration of medication, and failed to obtain a physician's order to keep medication at the bedside for 1 resident (Resident # 34) of 5 residents observed during medication pass.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Self-Administration Of Medications, effective 01/2022, indicated, In order to maintain the residents' high level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. The policy further indicated, A. If the resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive (including orientation to time), physical, and visual ability to carry out this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when medication was not available for administration for 1 (Resident #34) of 5 residents observed for medication administration.Findings included: During an interview on 06/05/2026 at 9:20 AM, the Assistant Administrator stated it was common practice to notify the physician if medication was not available; subsequently, the facility did not have a policy regarding physician notification. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #34 on 08/21/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of systolic congestive heart failure. Resident #34's Order Summary Report, for the timeframe from 06/01/2024 through 06/30/2026, included an order dated 04/30/2025 for Lasix oral tablet 20 milligrams (mg) one tablet daily for systolic congestive heart failure. Resident #34's May 2026 Medication Administration Record [MAR] revealed staff documented 9 for Lasix 20 mg for 05/28/2026 through 05/31/2026. Per the MAR, a chart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) form to the state-designated authority after the addition of a new psychiatric diagnosis for 1 (Resident #10) of 2 residents reviewed for the accuracy of the PASRR.Findings included: During an interview on 06/05/2026 at 1:43 PM, the Assistant Administrator revealed that the facility had no PASRR policy. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #10 on 01/02/2025. According to the admission Record the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, or anxiety (onset 01/02/2025), delusional disorders (onset 02/11/2025), and unspecified depression (onset 03/17/2025). A Level I PASRR Screen, dated 01/13/2025, indicated Resident #10 had a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia. The screening form indicated the resident had no evidence of a serious mental illness including possible disturbances in orientation or mood. The screening form revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter tubing was secured and a urine collection bag was stored in a manner to prevent infection for 1 (Resident #60) of 2 residents with a urinary catheter.Findings included: A facility document titled, Catheter Care Guideline, with an effective date of 03/2025, indicated, Our facility is committed to providing proper catheter care in accordance with current professional standards of practice. The document further indicated the Purpose was, To ensure care aligns with safe and effective management of urinary catheters and reduce the risk of infection and promote resident comfort and dignity. The document also indicated, 3. Daily Catheter Care: e. Position properly to prevent pulling. -May use external anchoring device. The document also revealed, 5. Managing the Drainage Bag: a. Keep the bag below bladder level and secure it properly to prevent pulling. b. Empty the drainage bag regularly, ensuring the spout does not touch any surfaces. An admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were trained on the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required for contact isolation for 1 (Dietary Aide [DA] #15) of 1 dietary staff reviewed for infection control competencies.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Infection Control and Isolation Guideline, dated July 2025, indicated, To prevent the spread of infectious diseases and promote a safe environment for residents, staff, and visitors utilizing evidence-based infection control and isolation practices in accordance with current Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. The policy also indicated, Transmission-Based Precautions used in addition to Standard Precautions for known or suspected infections. A. Contact Precautions-PPE: Gown and gloves upon room entry. During an observation and concurrent interview on 06/01/2026 at 9:51 AM, DA #15 was observed entering and exiting a resident room that had signage indicating the resident was on contact precautions.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff donned Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on entering a resident's room with contact isolation precautions for 1 (Resident #45) of 4 residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. Specifically, Dietary Aide (DA) #15 entered and exited Resident #45's room without donning PPE, when the resident was on contact isolation precautions.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Infection Control and Isolation Guideline, effective 07/2025, indicated, Purpose - To prevent the spread of infectious diseases and promote a safe environment for residents, staff, and visitors utilizing evidence-based infection control and isolation practices in accordance with current CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] guidelines. The policy also indicated, 2. Transmission-Based Precautions - Used in addition to Standard Precautions for known or suspected infections. A. Contact Precautions, and PPE: Gown and gloves upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-31 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit payroll based staffing information to CMS as required for the 3rd quarter of 2024. The administrator identified 95 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A PBJ Staffing Data Report - FY Quarter 3 2024, documented there was no data submitted for the third quarter. On 10/31/24 at 10:08 a.m., the administrator stated they did not think anyone had been completing it. They were asked what was the process for ensuring it was accepted. They stated, I don't think it was getting done.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL care to dependent residents for two (#21 and #64) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The administrator identified 95 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Significant Change Assessment, dated 09/09/24, documented Resident #21's daily decision making was severely impaired. It documented the resident was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. On 10/27/24 at 9:41 a.m., Resident #21 was observed seated in their gerichair in their room. Their hair was observed uncombed, and their facial hair was observed to be straggled, and unshaven. On 10/28/24 at 1:34 p.m., Resident #21 was observed in bed. Their hair was observed uncombed, and their facial hair was observed to be straggled, and unshaven. On 10/29/24 at 9:53 a.m., Resident #21 was observed seated in their gerichair in their room. Their hair was observed uncombed, and their facial hair was observed to be straggled, and unshaven. 2. Resident #64 had diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at a resident's bedside for one (#55) of 24 sampled residents observed for bedside medications. The administrator identified 95 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #55 had diagnoses which included dementia. Resident #55 had the following physician orders, dated 08/19/24, documented Vicks Vapor rub 4.8 % - 1.2 % -2.6% topical ointment, apply by topical route two times per day to toenails for nail fungus; nystatin 100,000 unit/gram topical powder apply by topical route two times per day under bilateral breasts for rash; and Aquaphor or equivalent to bilateral lower extremities every day for dryness and itching. There were no self administrating of medications orders. An Annual Assessment, dated 09/12/24, documented Resident #55's cognition was moderately impaired. On 10/27/24 at 12:50 p.m., Resident #55 was observed seated in their wheelchair in their room. Resident #55 was not interviewable. Two medication cups with white cream and one medication cup with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$3,174 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $3,174 — penalty dated 2023-11-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $806K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK