Wildewood Skilled Nursing And Therapy

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 74.9 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide mail service to residents on Saturdays. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/12/24 at 2:52 p.m. during a Resident Council group meeting with 18 residents in attendance, they stated they were not aware of any mail being delivered on Saturdays. On 09/13/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Social Services Director stated the BOM received the mail from the reception desk and sorts through it. They stated the residents personal mail went in to the Social Service Director's box. The Social Services Director stated they delivered personal mail to the residents. On 09/13/24 at 2:01 p.m., the DON stated the mail was not delivered on the weekends.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was informed about a fall intervention for one (#237) of two residents reviewed for falls. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Fall Program policy, revised 05/24, read in part, Educate resident's family .regarding these interventions and encourage family assistance and support. Resident #237 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included history of falling, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Resident #237's care plan for falls, revised 09/06/24, documented intervention for mattress on the floor. On 09/11/24 at 10:37 a.m., Resident #237 was observed laying on a floor mattress. There were two mattresses laid side by side. On 09/12/24 at 9:56 a.m., Resident #237 stated they did not like sleeping on the floor mattress. They stated staff told them it would stop them from falling. Resident #237 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a NOMNC to one (#239) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. Regional Nurse Consultant #1 identified two residents who received skilled services in the facility. Findings: Resident #239 admitted to Part A skilled services on 02/12/24 and discharged from Part A services on 03/06/24. Resident #239 discharged home. There was no documentation a NOMNC was provided to Resident #239. On 09/12/24 at 1:39 p.m., the DON stated they could not locate a NOMNC for Resident #239.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a home like environment for one (#30) of two residents reviewed for homelike environment. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #30 had diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia. On 09/10/24 at 2:44 p.m., Resident #30's bed had an off white, dirty fitted sheet with a yellow spot and a torn pillow with no pillowcase. On 09/11/24 at 9:37 a.m., multiple brown spots were observed on Resident #30's fitted sheet. The yellow spot was still on the Resident's fitted sheet. Resident #30 stated their linens needed to be changed. On 09/11/24 at 10:16 a.m., CNA #1 stated they personally changed residents' linens every day. They stated the facility's process was Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. On 09/11/24 at 10:17 a.m., CNA #1 stated if a resident had dirty linens, they would change them. On 09/11/24 at 10:18 a.m., CNA #1 stated the use of torn pillows was not acceptable and they would replace them. On 09/11/24 at 10:19 a.m., CNA #1 stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#39) of one sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property policy, undated, read in part, .The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse .Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enable through the use of technology . Resident #39 had diagnosis which included vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety. Resident #39's quarterly assessment, dated 08/04/24, documented Resident #39 had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance with ADLs. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, dated 12/01/23, documented an allegation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed in a timely manner for one (#84) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #84 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure and general anxiety disorder. There was no baseline care plan located in Resident #84's EHR or hard chart. On 09/12/24 at 12:40 p.m., MDS coordinator #1 stated the policy for initiating a baseline care plan was to access the baseline assessment on the EHR and it should be completed upon admission by the nurse admitting the resident. On 09/12/24 at 12:44 p.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated Resident #84 did not have a baseline care plan in their records.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received restorative services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one (#4) of one sampled resident reviewed for restorative services. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. MDS Coordinator #1 identified 10 residents on restorative services. Findings: A Restorative Nursing policy, revised 07/06/09, read in part, .It is the policy of this facility to provide restorative nursing services to promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on maintaining optimal physical, mental and psychosocial function. Skill practice in such activities as walking and mobility, dressing and grooming, eating and swallowing, transferring, amputation care, and communication can maintain function in physical abilities and ADLs and prevent further impairment .Interventions will be assigned to designated nursing assistants and they will initial the daily record of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered for one (#38) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified eight residents who received continuous oxygen therapy in the facility. Findings: Resident #38 had diagnoses which included COPD and heart failure. A physician's order, dated 05/24/24, documented continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula related to COPD. On 09/10/24 at 3:34 p.m., Resident #38 was observed receiving oxygen. They stated they were on continuous oxygen at 2 liters. The concentrator was set at 3 liters per minute. On 09/10/24 at 3:46 p.m., LPN #1 reviewed Resident #38's orders. They stated the Resident was to receive 2 liters oxygen and there were no orders to increase as needed. On 09/10/24 at 3:49 p.m., LPN #1 observed Resident #38's concentrator. They stated it was set at 3 liters per minute. They stated it was wrong and adjusted the concentrator to 2 liters per minute. On 09/12/24 at 10:10 a.m., the DON stated oxygen should be administered as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviewed and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis resident had orders for monitoring for one (#78) of one sampled resident who were reviewed for dialysis. The Administrator identified 80 residents who resided in the facility. The DON identified five residents who received dialysis. Findings: Resident #78 had diagnoses which included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with stage five chronic kidney disease, or end stage renal disease. Resident #78's renal care plan, initiated 01/24/24, documented the following interventions; a. check and change dressing daily at access site, b. check AVF for thrill and bruit every shift. If absent notify the physician, c. monitor AVF for S/S trauma and/or infection every shift, and d. remove AVF dressing four hours after dialysis treatment one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. There were no orders or documentation for monitoring the above. On 09/16/24 at 1:25 p.m., LPN #2 stated dialysis residents were monitored by taking vital signs and checking the thrill and bruit upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for one (#30) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Regional Nurse Consultant #1 identified 15 residents who received insulin in the facility. Findings: A Specific Medication Administration Procedures policy, effective 01/22, read in part, .To administer medications via subcutaneous .routes in a safe, accurate, and effective manner .Check the order on the medication administration record to see that an injection is currently ordered and due .Document administration . Resident #30 had diagnoses which included type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications and for type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. A Physician's order, dated 01/23/24, documented Humalog injection solution inject 5 units intramuscularly with meals related to type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. A Physician's order, dated 01/23/24, documented Humalog injection solution inject…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $501K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK