The Wilshire Skilled Nursing And Therapy

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 40.5 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-06-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and failed to ensure 2 of 2 dumpsters observed were covered to reduce the potential for harboring insects or rodents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings included: The U.S. FDA Food Code, dated 2022, revealed, Chapter 5. Water, Plumbing, and Waste revealed, 5-501.15 Outside Receptacles, which included, (A) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE, recyclables, and returnable used with materials containing FOOD residue and used outside the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers; and (B) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE and recyclables such an on-site compactor shall be installed so that accumulation of debris and insect and rodent attraction and harborage are minimized and effective cleaning is facilitated around and, if the unit is not installed flush with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, facility document review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification requirements was provided a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) prior to the end of covered Medicare Part A services. Findings included: The facility's undated Resident's Rights and Family Handbook included a document titled, Licensed Nursing Facility's Policy Statement Regarding Residents' Right to Self-Determination, which revealed, 1. It is our policy to follow the directions of our Residents who have the capacity to make decisions to the extent allowed by law. You will be considered to have capacity to make health care decisions unless unconscious, determined to be incompetent by a court of law, or medically determined by your attending physician to be unable to make health care decisions. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 02/02/2024. According to the admission Record, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances with regard to missing property, which affected 1 (Resident #27) of 2 residents reviewed for personal property concerns. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident/Family Grievances, revised 03/03/2020, revealed, The facility promotes an atmosphere in which the resident/family has a right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Resident/Family grievances could include treatment, funds, lost items or violation of rights. The facility will attempt to work with resident/family to resolve grievances promptly. The policy revealed, Any grievance from resident/family should be recorded on a Grievance Log (NRSG-O02-G). Grievance Log should be updated and reviewed in the Q2 meeting and a designee will be assigned to call or follow-up on the grievance using the To Do List (NRSG-062-H). The Designee will document any follow-up contact on the Grievance Log and discuss any resolution in the Q2 meeting. Resident/Records/Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nails were kept clean and trimmed for 1 (Resident #3) of 1 resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Nursing Skills Guideline, revised 03/2025, indicated, Assistance with activities of daily living will be provided in a manner that prioritizes the resident's comfort, safety, and personal preferences. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 01/09/2026. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of legal blindness and sequelae of cerebral infarction (long-term condition or complications as a result of a stroke). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/08/2026, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated that Resident #3 required substantial/maximal assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician orders with regard to laboratory testing, dressing changes, and application of ice packs, which affected 1 (Resident #50) of 14 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Skin and Wound Care Guidelines Skin Integrity/Wound Care, revised 07/2024, indicated, 4. Current Treatment, which specified, Medical treatments will be ordered by a physician or their designee. The policy revealed, 7. The nurse who identifies areas of skin breakdown should complete the following, which included Notify the attending provider; and Obtain a treatment and initiate. The policy further indicated, 11. A multidisciplinary plan of care will be implemented that reflects intervention strategies designed to alleviate, reduce, or minimize the negative effects of each resident's identified risk factors, and manage and treat existing pressure ulcers. Care plan to be implemented by the charge or staff nurse, *Document appropriate interventions on falling stars. An admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0914 — isolated
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility document review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident shared bedrooms were designed and equipped to maintain full visual privacy for residents in them, which affected 4 (Residents #43, #35, #24, and #14) 4 residents identified with privacy curtain concerns. Findings included: During an interview on 06/10/2026 at 11:15 AM, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) stated that the facility did not have a policy related to resident privacy. The facility's undated Resident's Right's and Family Handbook revealed Federal Resident Rights, which included You have the right to privacy, as well as private telephone calls, meetings and mail. 1. A quarterly Minimum Data Screening Assessment (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/24/2026, indicated that the facility admitted Resident #43 on 02/16/1999. The MDS revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Per the MDS, the resident had active diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for two (#7 and #8) of two sampled residents whose medications were observed not to be stored according to company policy and procedure. The administrator identified 26 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Storage of Medications policy, dated 01/2022, read in part, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufactuers' recommendations or those of the supplier. The medications supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. On 11/22/24 at 11:10 a.m., medication cart #1, located on the west hall, was observed to be unattended. Res #7's metformin 500 mg (diabetic medication) was observed on top of the medication cart. On 11/22/24 at 11:11 a.m., medication cart #1, located on the west hall, was observed to be unattended. Res #8's clonidine 0.1 mg (blood pressure medication) and sevelamer 800 mg (phosphate binder) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident Council meetings were held. The administrator identified 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility Resident Rights and Family Handbook, undated, read in part, .The Resident Council is designed to give residents and family members a regular opportunity to participate in the planning of future activities and events. The Resident Council meeting also provides a forum to exchange ideas and socialize with people facing similar challenges. Resident Council meetings are scheduled monthly on the activity calendar . The September 2024 Activity Calendar documented a Resident Council meeting was scheduled on 09/18/24 at 2:00 p.m. On 09/18/24 at 8:25 a.m., the Resident Council president stated they took over a Resident Council president four weeks ago. They stated they thought there was a Resident Council meeting scheduled, but they had not heard when. On 09/18/24 at 8:26 a.m., the administrator stated they were the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure scheduled activities were held. The administrator identified 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility Resident Rights and Family Handbook, read in part, .We have a full program of social, intellectual, recreational, creative and religious activities available to residents at our Center. The variety of activities offers something of interest to everyone. A calendar of monthly events is posted in a convenient location . The September 2024 Activity Calendar documented on 09/18/24 the facility was to have exercise at 9:00 a.m. and cup pong at 10:00 a.m. 1. Resident #24 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness and multiple sclerosis. An admission Resident Assessment, dated 04/16/24, documented it was very important for Resident #24 to do things with groups of people and it was very important for them to do their favorite activities. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 07/17/24, documented Resident #24's cognition was intact. On 09/17/24 at 1:50 p.m., Resident #24 stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. expired foods were removed from circulation; b. the kitchen was kept clean and in good repair; and c. leftover reheated soup reached an internal temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit. The administrator identified 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Weekly Cleaning Schedule, documented the refrigerator, and the wall behind the back and front door to the kitchen were to be cleaned weekly to include the bottom of the refrigerators and freezers. On 09/17/24 at 10:54 a.m., the initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the CDM. On 09/17/24 at 11:03 a.m., a carton of nectar thickened tea in the refrigerator was dated 08/23/23 with a best used by date of 12/28/23. The CDM stated the policy for food storage was to label, date, and rotate. On 09/17/24 at 11:05 a.m., the CDM stated the thickener was expired. On 09/17/24 at 11:13 a.m., the dry storage area had five more cartons of the same thickener with the same best used by date of 12/28/23. The CDM stated they must have gotten…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $142K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK