Sequoyah Pointe Skilled Nursing And Therapy

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 58.1 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/13/25, a past noncompliance situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to protect residents. An incident report, dated 05/02/25, showed Resident #1 had left the facility without staff knowledge and was found by local police in a commercial establishment's parking lot approximately 400 feet from the facility. Resident #1 was returned to the facility within 30 minutes of their departure and was transferred to a secured facility two days later. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of elopement did not elope from the facility for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. Corp. Nurse Consult. #1 reported five residents wandered at the facility. Findings: On 05/13/25 at 10:30 a.m., the lock on the kitchen door was observed during the initial tour. A facility document titled Elopement Risk Guideline, dated 04/2025, read in part, 1. The Elopement risk assessment is completed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for one (#35) of 24 sampled residents observed for call lights. The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #35 had diagnoses which included chronic pain. The Care Plan, dated 09/28/22, documented to place call light within reach and to encourage the resident to use it. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/31/24, documented Resident #35's cognition was severely impaired. It documented the resident required assistance from staff for their ADLs and mobility. On 01/06/25 at 12:50 p.m., Resident #35 was observed laying in bed in their room. Resident #35 was heard screaming out wanting clean clothes. The call light was observed clipped to the privacy curtain out of reach of the resident. An orange sign was observed on the wall next to the resident's window. The sign read, Before leaving residents room please ensure all call light button are within residents reach. CNA #2 was observed going into Resident #35's room to provide care. On 01/06/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within 14 days of admission for one (#24) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 54 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, acute cystitis with hematuria, and indwelling urinary catheter. On 01/06/25 at 2:22 p.m., no comprehensive care plan was present in the EHR nor paper chart for Resident #24. On 01/08/25 at 8:21 a.m., the ADON was asked the process for completing comprehensive care plans for new admissions. They stated care plans for residents receiving skilled services were completed by the corporate nurse within 14 days of admission. After a review of Resident #24's care plan, the ADON acknowledged it had not been completed within 14 days of admission.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure heel lift boots were in place as ordered for one (#36) of two sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The administrator identified seven residents had orders for heel lift boots. Findings: Resident #36 had diagnoses which included left side hemiplegia. Resident #36's Order Summary Report, dated 05/03/23, documented for heel lift boots to be in place every shift for wound prevention. A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk assessment, dated 12/18/24, documented Resident #36 was at high risk for developing a pressure ulcer A Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/18/24, documented Resident #36's cognition was severely impaired. It documented the resident had impairment to their upper and lower extremities. On 01/06/25 at 2:31 p.m., Resident #36 was observed laying in their bed. Heel lift boots were not observed on the resident's feet. On 01/07/25 at 7:45 a.m., Resident #36 was observed up in their geri chair in their room. Heel lift boots were not observed on the resident's feet. On 01/07/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained to promote food safety and sanitation. The administrator reported 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/26/23 at 10:20 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. The handwashing sink was observed to have a brown dirt like substance on the back of it. b. A sink and countertop in the dry storage area was observed to have a red sticky substance on it. c. The cabinet under the sink in the dry storage was observed to be open exposing the pipes. d. A freezer temperature was observed to be at 38 degree Fahrenheit. The freezer contained a box of corn dogs, a bag of garlic bread, and a box of tater tots. All the foods were observed not frozen. The temperature log documentation stopped on 10/04/23. e. The stove/oven was observed to have a grease film on the front and down the sides. A dried white substance was observed on the oven door and the side of the oven. f. A three compartment sink in the cooking area was observed to have a bucket under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained a clean, odor-free, and homelike environment. The CMS 671 form, dated 10/26/23, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Housekeeping Policies and Procedures packet, revised 06/29/12, read in parts, .Every resident room should undergo complete wet cleaning, disinfection and deodorizing daily .Pick up all litter on resident room floor and bathroom floor .Dust mop, making sure closet and areas under furniture are included . On 10/26/23 at 1:00 p.m., the following observations were made: a. The east hallway had a strong smell of urine, b. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a strong smell of urine. A bedside commode was observed located beside the bed with a large amount of medium yellow urine observed inside the basin. The bottom of the commode basin had dark yellow and brown stains. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] had large amount of dust and food debris observed underneath and around both beds. Multiple dead cockroaches…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for two (#8 and #43) of five sampled residents reviewed for bathing. The CMS 671 form, dated 10/26/23, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #43 was admitted with diagnoses which included respiratory failure, depressive disorders, and anxiety. An admission assessment, dated 06/07/23, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive one person physical assistance with bathing. A care plan, dated 06/16/23, documented the resident was to be bathed with the physical help of one person every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday during the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift. The August 2023 bathing record documented Res #43 was bathed four out of 13 opportunities. The September 2023 bathing record documented Res #43 was bathed six out of 13 opportunities. The October 2023 bathing record documented Res #43 was bathed four out of 13 opportunities. On 10/26/23 at 2:12 p.m., Res #43 stated they were upset because they often have not received their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to document and retain daily staffing information for the past 18 months. The CMS 671 form, dated 10/26/23, documented a census of 58 residents. Findings: On 10/26/23 at 11:00 a.m. and throughout the survey, the white boards behind each nursing station was observed to include documentation of the census number, name and titles of the staff on duty. Staffing hours were not documented. On 11/02/23 at 11:55 a.m., the administrator reported they were not aware of the requirements to post staffing hours and retain the documentation for 18 months.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was physically restrained was assessed, monitored, and the restraint was used to treat a medical symptom for one (#16) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for seat belt usage. The DON identified one resident who used a seat belt. Findings: Res #16 was admitted with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, dementia with behavioral disturbances, muscle weakness, neuropathy, macular degeneration and age-related osteoporosis. A fall risk care plan initiated on 03/21/18, documented Res #16 was at risk for falls due to requiring staff assistance with ADL's and psychotropic medication use. A non-restraint safety devices care plan initiated on 03/21/18, documented Res #16 may use an alarming self-releasing seatbelt when up in wheelchair. The care plan also documented Res #16 was able to release belt at will and upon request. A list of falls from 06/10/22 to present was provided by the DON and documented Res #16 had 11 falls. A physician order dated, 01/15/23, read in part, May use alarming…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a new mental health diagnosis to OHCA for a PASRR level II evaluation for one (#8) of one sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. The administrator reported 37 residents had mental health diagnoses. Findings: Res #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of intellectual disabilities and mood disorder due to known physiological condition. A PASRR level I, dated 02/12/13, documented Level II cleared, eligible for admission to LTC 02/06/13. The resident record documented the resident received a new diagnosis of schizophrenia on 08/19/22. The record contained no documentation that OHCA was contacted about the new diagnosis. On 11/02/23 at 8:36 a.m., MDS #1 reported that OHCA should have been contacted about the new mental health diagnosis.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $531K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK