University Park Skilled Nursing And Therapy Memory

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 47.9 residents a day — about 34% occupied, or roughly 91 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-03-10 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that annual competency reviews were completed for 2 (CNA #2 and CNA #3) of 5 staff members reviewed for annual competency reviews. The administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. CNA #3 was hired on 04/10/03. 2. CNA #2 was hired on 04/11/22. CNA #3 and CNA #2's personnel files were reviewed and did not contain annual competency reviews. On 03/06/25 at 2:37 p.m., the administrator was asked to provide documentation of the annual competency reviews for CNA #3 and CNA #2. On 03/10/25 at 1:20 p.m., the administrator stated they were unable to locate the annual competency reviews for CNA #3 and CNA #2.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform post fall neurological checks for 1 (#49) of 1 death record reviewed. The administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Fall Program policy, revised 05/24, read in part, Complete incident report and include neurological check sheet if suspect or confirmed the resident hit their head. Resident #49 had diagnoses which included epilepsy, history of falling, and unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. An Incident Report, dated 01/12/25, read in part, Unwitnessed fall. Resident was found by staff on the floor in prone position in front of his wheelchair in the lobby. Full head to toe assessment completed at the time of incident. Laceration to forehead with moderate bleeding noted. Laceration to right hand with moderate bleeding noted. Pressure dressing applied to both sites and EMS contacted. EMS left with resident at approximately 2000 [8:00 p.m.] Notified DON, administrator and son of transfer. A hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrator filters were sanitary for 1 (#39) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The administrator identified seven residents received oxygen in the facility. Findings: On 03/04/25 at 2:12 p.m., Resident #39's oxygen concentrator filters were observed to have moderate dust build up. The Cleaning Oxygen Concentrators policy, revised 02/27/20, read in part, Oxygen concentrators are cleaned monthly or every four weeks, and as needed. Resident #39 had diagnoses which included shortness of breath and sleep apnea. On 03/06/25 at 2:08 p.m., LPN #2 stated the filters were dirty and had dust build up. They stated they needed to be cleaned. On 03/06/25 at 2:10 p.m., the DON stated the oxygen concentrator filters were to be cleaned monthly. They stated they put an order in the system for the cleaning to keep track but no order was needed. On 03/06/25 at 2:14 p.m., LPN #2 reviewed Resident #39's orders. They stated there was no order to clean the oxygen concentrator filters. On 03/06/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure post dialysis documentation had been completed for 1 (#26) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility MDS [minimum data set] Resident Matrix, showed one resident received dialysis. Findings: Resident #26 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The Dialysis Communication forms, read in part, B. Post Dialysis This section to be completed by dialysis unit and returned with the resident: A. Blood pressure B. Pulse C. Respirations D. Temperature E. Pre dialysis weight E1. Post dialysis weight F. Time dialysis started G. Time dialysis ended H. Check all that apply 1. dressing dry and intact 2. ports capped and clamped 3. pain 4. bleeding 5. new orders sent with resident 6. s/s of infection. A physician's order, dated 08/22/22, showed the resident was to receive dialysis weekly Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 02/20/25, showed the resident was cognitively intact and received dialysis while in the facility. The Dialysis Communication forms dated, 02/19/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented for 1 (#30) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The DON reported five residents with urinary catheters. Findings: On 03/07/25 at 8:19 a.m., LPN #1 and the ADON were observed providing catheter care for Resident #30, they were not observed to be wearing gowns. An Infection Control and Isolation Policy, revised 03/28/24, read in part, EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following .Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with an MDRO.EBP expands the use of PPE [personal protective equipment] and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities. Resident #30 had diagnoses which included benign prostate hyperplasia and diabetes mellitus. A physician's order, dated 10/31/24, showed catheter care was to be completed every shift and as needed. A physician's order, revised 11/01/24, showed enhanced barrier precautions were to be used because…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the regulatory requirements for transfer and discharge a resident for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for discharge. The charge nurse reported the census was 49. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia and psychotic disorder. A nurse's note, dated 01/01/25 at 8:30 p.m., documented LPN #1 notified RN #1 that Resident #1 was threatening to leave the facility and stating they could not force them to stay in the facility. The note also documented the on call physician was contacted and they requested a BIMS assessment (an assessment to determine cognitive statue) be completed. The note documented the assessment was completed and the resident was cognitively intact. The note documented if the resident insisted on discharging the discharge would be AMA. A police report #2501T0167, dated 01/01/25, documented a police officer observed Resident #1 standing on the side of the road. The report stated the police officer contacted Resident #1 and they reported they had been kicked out of the motel.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The charge nurse reported the census was 49. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia and psychotic disorder. A care plan, initiated 12/12/24, documented Resident #1 was at risk for leaving the facility related to confusion and they needed staff to monitor their location. A Medicare five-day assessment, dated 12/13/24, documented Resident #1 was severely impaired for daily decision making. A nurse's note, dated 12/16/24 at 12:40 a.m., documented Resident #1 was going into other resident rooms and required redirection. A nurse's note, dated 12/16/24 at 1:25 a.m., documented Resident #1 had blocked the entrance to their room and Resident #1 had opened their window more than once during this shift. A nurse's note, dated 12/16/24 at 4:43 a.m., documented Resident #1 had been going into other resident rooms. A nurse's note, dated 12/19/24 at 2:49 p.m., documented Resident #1 had been wandering and exit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The charge nurse reported the facility census was 49. Findings: A facility policy titled Content of Resident Medical Records, revised on 08/19/03, read in part, A medical record is to be completed as a confidential medicolegal document containing sufficient data to identify the resident, justify the diagnosis and treatment, and document the end results accurately. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia and psychotic disorder. A nurse's note, dated 01/01/25 at 8:30 p.m., documented LPN #1 notified RN #1 that Resident #1 was threatening to leave the facility and stating that they could not force them to stay in the facility. The note also documented that the on call physician was contacted and they requested a BIMS assessment (an assessment to determine cognitive statue) be completed. The note documented the assessment was completed and the resident was cognitively intact. The note documented that if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food and dishes were stored properly. The administrator identified all residents received services from the kitchen. Findings: A Food Storage policy, dated 04/20/09, read in part, .Storage: Area .floor should be .regularly cleaned .Shelving should be .cleaned .Any opened products should be placed in zip lock bags . On 11/27/23 at 12:28 p.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. a blue bag of shredded cheese and a gallon bag of sliced cheese were not sealed or dated in the walk in refrigerator, b. several beans were observed on bottom shelf in dry storage not in a container/bag, c. a container of all purpose mix with the lid not secured in the dry storage, d. one potato on the floor under empty crates in the dry storage area, and e. different sized bowls and plates on multiple shelves next to dishwasher area were faced up and not inverted. On 11/28/23 at 10:00 a.m., a follow up tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. several…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for two (#52 and #53) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for activities. The administrator identified 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Activities Policy, dated 03/07/01, read in part .It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each elder . 1. Resident #52 had diagnoses which included, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, anemia, and depressive disorder. Resident #52's admission assessment, dated 06/22/23, documented Resident #52's activity preferences as very important to have books and magazines to read, listen to music, be around animals, keep up with the news, do their favorite activities, go outside when the weather was good, and participate in religious services or practices. On 11/28/23 at 10:17 a.m., Resident #52 was observed sitting in their room watching television and was asked if they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIDGES HEALTH — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $432K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK