Haven Of Camp Verde

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 48.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility policy and procedure and police report, the facility failed to ensure life-saving measures including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were provided according to the advance directives for one resident (#10) who was found unresponsive. The deficient practice resulted in the resident not receiving life-saving measures and death.Findings include:Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of pneumonia due to pseudomonas, other acute osteomyelitis, bacteremia, autistic disorder, bipolar disorder, mood disorder, epilepsy, need for assistance with personal care, and unspecified lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood.An Alert Charting note dated January 22, 2026 revealed Resident #10 arrived to the facility at 1:50 p.m. and was on contact isolation precautions; and that, fall mats were placed on the floor next to the resident's bed for safety.The history & physical note dated January 23, 2026 included that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, facility documentation, and facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for one out of three sampled residents (Resident #17) related to blood glucose management. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving treatment as ordered, placing them at risk for potential harm.Findings include:Resident #17 was initially admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 1 Diabetes, Tinea Unguium, Hypo-osmolality, and Hyponatremia. An alert chart progress note dated April 04, 2026, revealed that the resident is alert and oriented times 4. A care plan initiated dated April 04, 2026 revealed a focus area noting that Resident #17 had Diabetes Mellitus (dm). The goal is for the resident to have no diabetes-related complications through the review date. Intervention included diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor, and monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. The intervention further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation and policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that daily staff postings were posted accurately regarding actual number of licensed and unlicensed staff that worked each shift and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed staff for 17 out of 17 days reviewed. The census was 43. The deficient practice could result in residents, visitors, and facility staff not being informed of accurate and current staffing information. Findings include: Review of 17 randomly selected daily staff postings and corresponding punch details revealed the number of Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) that worked each shift and the hours worked by staff were not updated on the daily staff postings to include the actual number of staff that worked each shift and the actual hours worked by staff. The daily staff posting dated October 26, 2024, revealed a census of 44 residents with no evidence of the actual number of nurses and CNAs that worked each shift or the actual number of hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one (#75) of eleven sampled residents by failing to ensure the resident was free from abuse by another resident (#74). The census was 43 residents. The deficient practice resulted in resident-to-resident sexual abuse and had the potential to result in ongoing abuse and further harm to other residents.Findings include:Resident #75 (alleged victim) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, acute kidney failure, morbid obesity due to excess calories, obstructive sleep apnea, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms.A care plan focus for Resident #75, initiated [DATE], revealed that Resident #75 was at risk for an activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care and treatment were provided in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 4 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the implementation of resident safety interventions without physician authorization. Findings Include:Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbance; anxiety; type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and foot ulcer; alcohol abuse; and acquired absence of another left toe.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on January 13, 2023, indicated that Resident #77 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, reflecting moderate cognitive impairment.Review of a Progress Note (Alert Note) dated January 16, 2023, at 1:22 p.m., documented that Resident #77 remained at risk for elopement. The note indicated that a functioning Wander Guard was in place and that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate assessment, monitoring, and supervision to prevent elopement for two of the four sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in injury to residents. Findings Include:About Resident #77:Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbance; anxiety; type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and foot ulcer; alcohol abuse; and acquired absence of another left toe.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on January 13, 2023, indicated that Resident #77 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, reflecting moderate cognitive impairment.Review of a Progress Note (Alert Note) dated January 16, 2023, at 1:22 p.m., documented that Resident #77 remained at risk for elopement. The note indicated that a functioning Wander Guard was in place and that staff continued to closely monitor the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one (#8) out of the three sample residents received activities of daily living (ADL) care as per facility policy. The deficient practice could result in resident's hygiene needs not being met, skin breakdown, and psychosocial harm.Findings include-Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included fracture of right femur, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis on right knee.Orders dated January 16, 2026, revealed a complete skin check weekly.A care plan initiated on January 17, 2026, revealed that the Resident #8 is at risk for functional self-care deficits and mobility. The interventions included Resident #8 required skin inspection during routine cares and per bath schedule, observe for redness, open areas, scratches, cuts, bruises and report changes to the nurse. The care plan further revealed that the resident is at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#2) to be free from physical abuse by another resident (#4). The deficient practice could lead to physical or psychosocial harm of a resident. Findings include: -Resident #2 was admitted to the facility March 28, 2025, and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, pressure ulcer of sacrum, laceration of right foot with foreign body, and unspecified dementia. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The clinical record review revealed no evidence of a description of a resident to resident incident on May 6, 2025, notification of the incident to the medical provider, and any assessment for injury following the incident. -Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the facility abuse policy was implemented for a resident (#2) with an allegation of abuse. The deficient practice could lead to physical or psychosocial harm of a resident. Finidngs include: -Resident #2 was admitted to the facility March 28, 2025, and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, pressure ulcer of sacrum, laceration of right foot with foreign body, and unspecified dementia. The clinical record review revealed no evidence of a description of a resident to resident incident on May 6, 2025, any monitoring or that the resident was placed on alert charting, notification of the incident to the medical provider, and any assessment for injury following the incident. -Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included alcohol dependence, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, nontraumatic subdural…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed to meet the needs of one resident (#2). The deficient practice could lead to care team members not being aware of a resident's medical conditions and/or plan of care to address the resident's individual needs. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility March 28, 2025, and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, pressure ulcer of sacrum, laceration of right foot with foreign body, and unspecified dementia. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. There was no evidence of a baseline care plan to address the resident's impaired cognition. An interview was conducted with the DON (Staff #16) on May 13, 2025, at 1:58 PM. The DON stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for one resident (#2) following an allegation of abuse. The deficient practice could lead to care team members not being aware of a resident's status, and lead to missed or delayed treatment. Findings include: -Resident #2 was admitted to the facility March 28, 2025, and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, pressure ulcer of sacrum, laceration of right foot with foreign body, and unspecified dementia. A facility self-report submitted to the State Agency, dated May 6, 2025, revealed on May 6, 2025, at approximately 2:45 PM, Resident #2 was calling to the clinical staff in the hall for help. Resident #2's roommate, Resident #4, was bothered by the volume and moved his body closer to Resident #2 from the other side of the room. Resident #4 moved his arm in the direction of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,864 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,864 — penalty dated 2026-02-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $394K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ