Haven Of Scottsdale

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 46Number of residents cited: 1Based on observation, interview, review of clinical record, staff interviews, review of facility's video footage, policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to one resident (#27). The deficient practice resulted in the resident sustaining injury from accidental foley catheter dislodgement and a transfer to the hospital.Findings include:-Resident #27 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute on chronic congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, pneumonia, unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, and retention of urine.A care plan dated December 5, 2025, revealed Resident #27 was at risk for functional self-care deficits and/or functional mobility limitations related to subdural hemorrhage; and, had a catheter. Goals were to safely perform functional self-care and mobility tasks; and, that the resident will be and will remain free from catheter-related trauma. Interventions included that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to implement their policy on abuse reporting and investigation for allegations of abuse for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#77 and #72). The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not reported, not investigated and residents not protected from continued abuse.Findings include: -Resident #77 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, osteoporosis and chronic pain. The ADL (activities of Daily Living) care plan dated August 1, 2023 included the resident was at risk for ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention included to encourage resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. The progress note dated August 1, 2023 revealed the resident was admitted after a GLF (ground level fall) at home and presented with left hip fracture. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) fall review dated August 7, 2023 included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegations of abuse were reported to APS and law enforcement; and failed to ensure that the results of the investigations of the alleged violation for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#77 and #72) were submitted to the SA within 5 working days of the incident. The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not investigated and residents not protected from continued abuse.Findings include: -Resident #77 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, osteoporosis and chronic pain. The ADL (activities of Daily Living) care plan dated August 1, 2023 included the resident was at risk for ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention included to encourage resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. The progress note dated August 1, 2023 revealed the resident was admitted after a GLF (ground level fall)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#77 and #72) were thoroughly investigated. The deficient practice could result in residents not protected from continued abuse and appropriate corrective action not taken.Findings include: -Resident #77 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, osteoporosis and chronic pain. The ADL (activities of Daily Living) care plan dated August 1, 2023 included the resident was at risk for ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention included to encourage resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. The progress note dated August 1, 2023 revealed the resident was admitted after a GLF (ground level fall) at home and presented with left hip fracture. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) fall review dated August 7, 2023 included that the resident sustained a fall on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Regarding Resident #82: Resident #82 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. An admission Evaluation note dated January 2, 2026, revealed Resident #82 admitted from short-term general hospital for intravenous (IV) infusions with contact isolation. A physician order dated January 3, 2026, included contact isolation due to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) for 5 days or until treatment has been completed on January 6. A care plan focus dated January 4, 2026, revealed the resident had an active infection including ESBL with interventions that included contact/droplet isolation precautions, educate resident and staff regarding preventative measures to contain infection, use as much disposable equipment as possible or use dedicated equipment (i.e. BP cuff, thermometer), non-disposable resident care equipment to be appropriately cleaned and disinfected per facility protocol, provide independent activities or 1:1 activities as tolerated by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#27) was treated with dignity and respect. The deficient practice could lead to psychosocial harm of a resident.-Findings include:Resident #27 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute on chronic congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, pneumonia, unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, and retention of urine.An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #27 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.A care plan focus dated December 5, 2025, revealed Resident #27 was at risk for functional self care deficits and / or functional mobility limitations, with a goal to safely perform functional self care and mobility tasks. Interventions included: -The resident required assistance with transferring-Encourage resident to participate to the fullest extent possible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that the Ombudsman was provided a copy of the notice of discharge for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#76 and #70). The deficient practice could result in residents being inappropriately discharged .Findings include:-Resident #76 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and anxiety. The admission evaluation dated September 16, 2025 included that the resident was admitted from a short-term general hospital via a stretcher for post-op rehabilitation. The skilled needs review dated September 17, 2025 revealed that the IDT (interdisciplinary team) attested that the resident met all the criteria for skilled services and the case manager approved continued stay through September 18, 2025. According to the documentation, the resident was expected to be discharged to community. The social services progress note dated September…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#27) was administered narcotic medication according to physician order. The deficient practice could lead to physical harm of a resident from overdose of narcotic medication.-Findings include:Resident #27 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute on chronic congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, pneumonia, unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, and retention of urine.An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #27 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.A care plan focus initiated December 5, 2025, revealed Resident #27 had or was at risk for pain, with interventions that included to administer analgesia medication as per orders, to anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond as soon as possible to any complaint of pain, to monitor / record / report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care and services related to pressure ulcer was provided to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#64). The deficient practice could result in worsening of the resident's pressure ulcer.Findings include:Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of the upper end of the left tibia, type II diabetes with hyperglycemia and pulmonary fibrosis. The late entry admission evaluation note dated September 19, 2024 included that the resident was admitted from a short-term general hospital, had shortness of breath with lying flat, was on 2 liters of oxygen via nares to keep oxygen saturation above 90% while lying flat, and had bowel and bladder incontinence. The Braden scale dated September 19, 2024 revealed a score of 15 indicating the resident had low risk of developing pressure ulcers. The progress note dated September 19, 2024 included the resident was alert to name only and had a stage 4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure protocols for reconciliation of controlled medications were followed by staff to prevent diversion of narcotic medications for 2 sampled residents (#73 and #74). The deficient practice could result in result in risk of harm including inadequate relief of pain and complications associated with the medication use and misuse.Findings include: -Resident #74 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis of the right ankle and foot, infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left hip prosthesis and pain in the left hip. The admission evaluation dated February 9, 2024 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] from short-term general hospital. The care plan dated February 9, 2024 included that the resident was prescribed with high risk medications and was at risk for pain. Interventions included to administer analgesia medications as per orders, observe for and report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food was labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards. The deficient practices could result in food-borne illnesses.Findings include:-Regarding food labeling, dating and storageA kitchen observation was conducted on January 4, 2026 at 7:21 a.m. with the morning cook (staff #6) and revealed the following:-A [NAME] style cooking wine in walk-in dry storage was found with use by date of August 25, 2025--Within the large, three-door freezer, peas and sliced carrot were discovered wrapped in a blue plastic bag and lacked any date labeling.Initial observation of the nourishment refrigerator located close to nurse station was conducted on January 4, 2026, at approximately 8:20 a.m., revealed that the multiple edible items which were almost full capacity in an unorganized fashion and the following items were not labelled and dated:-A transparent plastic container with a red lid containing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $459K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ