Haven Of Flagstaff

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 301 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 77.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#10) was free from a preventable accident that resulted in serious injury. The deficient practice could lead to further instances of accidents resulting in injuries to residents. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, cardiac murmur, repeated falls, difficulty in walking, and age-related osteoporosis. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A physician order dated March 22, 2025, indicated for a right ankle boot for possible calcaneal stress fracture, and to repeat right ankle x-ray the week of April 7, 2025. A care plan dated April 16, 2025, revealed that the resident had or was at risk for having functional mobility deficits or functional mobility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, clinical record reviews, facility documentation, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not diverted for two residents (#13 and #15). This deficient practice could result in Controlled Substance being diverted and not being available to residents as prescribed.Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #15:Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hyperlipidemia, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), and heart failure.A care plan initiated on November 13, 2025, revealed a focus area for the Resident #15 to be on Opiate medications related to post-surgical. The care also revealed a goal to be free of adverse reactions related to opiate medication and an intervention to administer medication as needed. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident is cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled resident (#136) were safe to self-administer medication. The deficient practice could result in a medication overdose. Findings Include: Resident #136 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of dysphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety and pressure ulcer. The admission Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. A Care Plan dated March 07, 2025 revealed no indication of a focus for medication self-administration. Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence of a medication self-administration order. Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence of a medication self-administration assessment. During an initial observation of resident #136's room was conducted on March 11, 2025 at 12:01 p.m., there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident # 284) was free from abuse by another resident (#183). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #183 Resident #183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2024 with diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and history of falling. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The assessment did not indicate any behaviors. A comprehensive care plan dated January 18, 2024, revealed that Resident #183 had communication problems due to dementia, and impaired cognitive function due to dementia. There was no evidence of a focus on interventions related to behaviors in the care plan. An alert charting progress note dated January 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was adjusting well to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy involving an allegation of abuse with two residents (#284 and #183) to law enforcement. The deficient practice could result in the appropriate State Agencies not being notified and allegations of abuse not being thoroughly investigated. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #183 Resident #183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and history of falling. A comprehensive care plan dated January 18, 2024 revealed that Resident #183 had communication problems due to dementia. The care plan also revealed that she had impaired cognitive function due to dementia. -Regarding Resident #284 Resident #284 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, visual hallucinations, and urinary tract infection. Review of the facility's investigation report revealed that on February 26, 2024, Resident #284…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident (#183) to resident (#284) abuse was reported to all applicable state agencies. The deficient practice could result in further allegations of abuse not being reported. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #183 Resident #183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and history of falling. A comprehensive care plan dated January 18, 2024 revealed that Resident #183 had communication problems due to dementia. The care plan also revealed that she had impaired cognitive function due to dementia. -Regarding Resident #284 Resident #284 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, visual hallucinations, and urinary tract infection. Review of the facility's investigation report revealed that on February 26, 2024, Residents #284 and #183 were found to be in in an altercation, with an allegation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated, when stored for residents' use. The deficient practice could increase the risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: -Regarding food labeling, dating and storage An initial kitchen observation was conducted on March 11, 2025 at 11:10 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM/staff #43). During the observation, the following items were found in the refrigerator not labelled and dated: -An apple juice in a clear pitcher with the lid -An orange juice in a clear pitcher with the lid -Cranberry juices in clear pitchers with lid -Roasted potatoes stored in a stainless-steel container and covered with the plastic wrap An interview was conducted on March 13, 2025 at 11:08 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM/staff #43). The DM stated that unlabeled prepared food have the potential risk for foodborne illness. Additionally, during the interview with the DM (staff #43) conducted on March 11, 2025 at 11:10 a.m., staff #43 explained that the unlabeled apple juice, orange juice,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are complete and accurate in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 15 sampled residents (# 183, 284). The deficient practice could result in records that do not accurately and completely reflect the care and services provided to residents. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #183 Resident #183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and history of falling. A comprehensive care plan dated January 18, 2024 revealed that Resident #183 had communication problems due to dementia. The care plan also revealed that she had impaired cognitive function due to dementia. A late entry change of condition summary note dated February 26, 2024 at 11:44 p.m., revealed that the resident was adjusting well to a new room. However, there was no evidence in the progress note regarding what the change of condition was or why the change of room was necessary.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#1 and #2) were free from physical abuse. The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include: -Regarding resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, low back pain, unsteadiness on feet, hypertension, unspecified glaucoma, major depressive disorder-recurrent, insomnia, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, osteoporosis, repeated falls and urinary tract infection. A review of the admission MDS (minimum data set) dated January 6, 2021 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. -Regarding resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified fracture of right femur, repeated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to submit a 5-day written investigation summary regarding physical altercation between 2 residents (#1 and #2). The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being investigated. Findings include: -Regarding resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, low back pain, unsteadiness on feet, hypertension, unspecified glaucoma, major depressive disorder-recurrent, insomnia, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, osteoporosis, repeated falls and urinary tract infection. A review of the admission MDS (minimum data set) dated January 6, 2021 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. -Regarding resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified fracture of right femur,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#3) received care for pressure ulcers consistent with professional standards when observed wound care assessments were not completed on a weekly basis. This had the potential for pressure ulcers for resident #3 to worsen. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including venous insufficiency (chronic-peripheral), pressure ulcer of the left heel (unstageable), pressure ulcer of the right heel (unstageable), acute posthemorragic anemia and cellulitis of the left lower limb. A review of the discharge MDS (minimum data set) dated March 10, 2021 revealed no BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score. A review of the physician orders revealed orders for daily wound care to both right/ left heels and posterior right/ left calf. Orders were further observed for physical and occupational therapy. An order dated March 10, 2021 was also observed for a consult for heel debridement. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,098 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,098 — penalty dated 2025-03-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $722K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ