No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Haven Of Lakeside

3401 North Lockwood Drive, Lakeside, AZ 85929 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (928) 368-2060 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (928) 368-2060 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$8,278 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-11)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5171 Cub Lake Road, Suite C380
Pharmacy
5160 S White Mountain Rd · (928) 532-5502 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway3.6 mi
900 W Deuce of Clubs · (928) 532-5656 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rim Trail1.6 mi
Rim Trail · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.4%10.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.9%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%2.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%12.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.4%21.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.5%94.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.1%20.6%21.2%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.3%87.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%23.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%10.4%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.011.471.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.531.421.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.6%CMS range 43.7–57.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.2–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting87.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge89.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.7%CMS range 5.9–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.34
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
51.2%
Total nursing turnover
46.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 96.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-19)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#75 and #10) were free from injuries from a preventable accident. The deficient practice could lead to serious injury or death to residents. Findings include: - Regarding resident #10: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of myocardial infarction type 2, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition, bipolar disorder current episode with hypomanic, burn of third degree of abdominal wall, burn of second degree of abdominal wall, dependence on supplemental oxygen, depression and anxiety disorder. Review of a smoking policy signed by the resident dated [DATE] revealed that the policy indicated that smoking is prohibited in any area where oxygen is being administered or stored. The policy indicated acknowledgement by the resident that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that a pressure ulcer was assessed and treated timely and according to physician orders for one resident (#10). The deficient practice could lead to deterioration of a resident's medical condition.-Findings include:Resident #10 was admitted to the facility December 25, 2025, with diagnoses of dementia, other acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, sepsis, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of right heel, non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, Alzheimer's disease, and acquired absence of left great toe.A physician order dated December 25, 2025, included to complete a skin check weekly.A Weekly Skin check and Wound assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had the following skin impairments:nephrostomy tube on the right iliac crestskin impairment on the back of the right handsignificant diabetic foot ulcer on the right heel that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that the medical record was complete, accurate, and readily accessible for one resident (#10). The deficient practice could lead to care team members not being aware of a resident's status.-Findings include:Resident #10 was admitted to the facility December 25, 2025, with diagnoses of dementia, other acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, sepsis, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of right heel, non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, Alzheimer's disease, and acquired absence of left great toe.A physician order dated December 25, 2025, included to complete a skin check weekly.A Weekly Skin check and Wound assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had the following skin impairments:nephrostomy tube on the right iliac crestskin impairment on the back of the right handsignificant diabetic foot ulcer on the right heel that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation, the facility failed to implement their policy on abuse regarding reporting and investigation of an allegation of abuse for one of 3 sampled resident (#51). The deficient practice could result in residents not protected from further abuse. Findings include:-Resident #17 (alleged perpetrator) was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction.A care plan revised on August 12, 2025 revealed the resident had behavior problems consisting of eating other resident's food, wandering, refusing care, and being sexually inappropriate. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, removing from situations and explaining why the behavior is inappropriate/unacceptable. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse for one of 3 sampled residents (#51) was reported to the State Agency, Ombudsman and law enforcement and failed to report the results of the investigation to the State Agency within 5 working days of the incident as required. The deficient practice could result in abuse not being reported and residents not protected from further abuse.Findings include: -Resident #17 (alleged perpetrator) was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction.A care plan revised on August 12, 2025 revealed the resident had behavior problems consisting of eating other resident's food, wandering, refusing care, and being sexually inappropriate. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, removing from situations and explaining why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse for one of 3 sampled residents (#51) was thoroughly investigated. The deficient practice could result in appropriate corrective action not taken to protect residents from further abuse.Findings include: -Resident #17 (alleged perpetrator) was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction.A care plan revised on August 12, 2025 revealed the resident had behavior problems consisting of eating other resident's food, wandering, refusing care, and being sexually inappropriate. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, removing from situations and explaining why the behavior is inappropriate/unacceptable. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documents and policy, [NAME] Nursing Drug Handbook, and Medlineplus.gov website, the facility failed to ensure medications for four residents (#24, #64, #9, #86) were administered as ordered by the physician. The deficient practice could place residents safety at risk and could result in resident's not receiving the treatment that they need.Number of residents sampled: 20Number of residents cited: 4Findings include:-Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, depression and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia.The care plan dated March 17, 2023 revealed the resident was on opiate medication and was at risk for pain related to pain and history of right hip fracture and generalized discomfort. Intervention included to administer medications as ordered.Another care plan dated March 18, 2023 revealed resident use antidepressant medication related to Depression. The interventions included to give antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The deficient practice could result in the activities provided not meeting the assessed needs of the residents. Findings include: A review of the personnel file for the Activities Director (staff #24) revealed staff #24 was hired on October 18, 2024. Review of staff #24's job description revealed that as the Activity Manager she directs the development, implementation, supervision, and ongoing evaluation of the activities program. This includes the completion of the activities component of the comprehensive assessment along with the comprehensive care plan goals and approaches. The job description indicated that the Activity Manager oversees the direction of the activity program to include scheduling of activities, both individual and groups, and the implementation of such programs. The Activity Manager directs the monitoring of the residents' responses as well as the evaluation of responses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documents and policy review, the facility failed to ensure current nurse staffing information was accurate for actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed direct care nursing staff and that the census was updated daily to reflect the actual number of residents. The deficient practice could result in residents and visitors not being informed of accurate and current staffing information and census. Findings include: The PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) Staffing Data Report revealed that the facility consistently triggered for excessively low weekend staffing the last two quarters in 2024 and the first three quarters of 2025. Per the report, submitted weekend data was excessively low. A weekend date was picked from each of the quarters that triggered for excessively low weekend for review. -Regarding June 30, 2024 Review of the June 30, 2024 Staff Posting indicated the following:-5 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) scheduled for the 6:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m. shift-Total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation and policy, [NAME] Nursing Drug Handbook and Medlineplus.gov website, the facility failed to ensure that medication error rates were not five percent or greater. The deficient practice could place residents safety at risk.Findings include:-Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, depression and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia.The care plan dated March 17, 2023 revealed the resident was on opiate medication and was at risk for pain related to pain and history of right hip fracture and generalized discomfort. Intervention included to administer medications as ordered.Another care plan dated March 18, 2023 revealed resident use antidepressant medication related to Depression. The interventions included to give antidepressant medications as ordered by the physician and monitor/document side effects and effectiveness.On September 15, 2025 at 7:36 AM, a medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation, staff interviews, and facility policies the facility failed to ensure that four staff members (#21, #58, #1, & 55) received Disaster training. The deficient practice could result in staff not being familiar with the procedures to follow in the event of an emergency and/or disaster.Findings include:On September 15, 2025 at 9:11 a.m., a written request for personnel files which included staffs #21, #58, #24, #16, #1, & 55) was submitted specifically asking for proof of Disaster training. -Regarding Staff #21Review of the personnel record for a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #21) revealed a hire date of August 1, 2024. Additionally, the personnel file revealed a signed job description dated August 4, 2024 that outlined tasks and responsibilities which stated that staff will participate in all required meetings, trainings and events. The file also included a New Employee Orientation Acknowledgement signed August 4, 2025. However, it did not indicate what training were covered under this orientation. Further review of the personnel file provided by the facility did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation, staff interviews, and facility policies the facility failed to ensure that two staff members (#21 and #58) are educated on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. The deficient practice could result in staff not being familiar with residents' rights. Findings include:On September 15, 2025 at 9:11 a.m., a written request for personnel files which included staffs #21 and #58 was submitted specifically asking for proof of training for Resident Rights. -Regarding Staff #21Review of the personnel record for a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #21) revealed a hire date of August 1, 2024. Additionally, the personnel file revealed a signed job description dated August 4, 2024 that outlined tasks and responsibilities which stated that staff will participate in all required meetings, trainings and events. However, review of the personnel file provided by the facility did not reveal any evidence that staff #21 completed Resident Rights training. Review of the Inservice training log/binder conducted on September 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation, staff interviews, and facility policies the facility failed to ensure that one staff member (#21) was educated on abuse, and that seven staff members (#21, #58, #24, #1, #12, #55 & #11) and one nursing aide (NA) student (staff #255) received Elder Justice Act training. The deficient practice could result in staff not being familiar with the detection, prevention and reporting of abuse, neglect, and exploitation of property.Findings include:On September 15, 2025 at 9:11 a.m., a written request for personnel files which included staffs #21, #58, #24, #1, #12, #55 & #11) was submitted specifically asking for proof of training for Abuse and Elder Justice Act. Additionally, a written request for personnel file for staff #255 specifically asking for proof of training for Abuse and Elder Justice Act was submitted on September 15, 2025 at 10:16 a.m. -Regarding Staff #21Review of the personnel record for a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #21) revealed a hire date of August 1, 2024. Additionally, the personnel file revealed a signed job description dated August 4, 2024 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure that the advance directive was consistent and correct for one Resident.(#7)Number of residents sampled: 20Number of residents cited: 1 Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that the advance directives were consistent throughout one (#7) of twenty sampled resident's clinical records. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving services that are not in accordance with their wishes. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],.2025 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation and Vascular Dementia. The resident was admitted to Hospice on August 18,2025. A Prehospital Medical Care directive signed by the resident's representative on August 18,2025 provided by the Hospice, revealed the resident chose the code status of DNR. (Do not resuscitate). The advance directive form signed by the resident on August 22, 2025 found in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#14) was referred for Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving appropriate services to meet their needs.Number of residents sampled: 20Number of residents cited: 1Findings include:Resident #14 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included myocardial infarction, depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder.A review of care plan dated January 3, 2024 revealed resident use antipsychotic and antidepressant medications related to schizoaffective disorder. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered, monitor side effects of the antipsychotic medication and report side effects and adverse reactions of medication to provider; and consult with pharmacy and provider to consider gradual dosage reduction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to coordinate with hospice to ensure quality care and services for one resident (#29). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the appropriate interventions for their comfort and end of life services.Findings include: A hospital record dated June 12, 2025 documented resident's plan of care included full liquid diet and continue supportive care. The plan indicated that the resident is to remain on full liquid diet indefinitely. Resident # 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the pancreas, atherosclerotic heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of the hospice respite care document dated August 29, 2025 revealed a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the pancreas. The paperwork indicated the resident's diet as as tolerated. A care plan revised on August 29, 2025 revealed that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policies and procedure, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services was provided to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#22) with limited ROM.Findings include: Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, cerebral atherosclerosis, dysphagia, and dysarthria. The OT (occupational therapy) evaluation dated November 1, 2021 included that resident required skilled OT services to improve rehab potential, increase functional activity tolerance, increase independence with ADLs (activities of daily living) and increase safety awareness. Per the documentation, the resident presented with deficits in ADL performance, strength, functional mobility and cognition; and that, skilled OT services was required to maximize functional performance, address deficits and promote safe discharge. Musculoskeletal assessment included that ROM (range of motion) of both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of facility documentations and policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were secured and stored properly. The deficient practice could result in unauthorized access to medications and could place resident's safety at risk.Findings include:A medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff #47) on September 15, 2025 at 11:19 AM. There was a gray basin covered with a white towel located on top of the medication cart. Staff #47 pulled a bottle of lactobacillus acidophilous (probiotic) from the gray basin then took one capsule from the bottle placed it in the medication cup and administered the medication to a resident. An interview was conducted with the LPN (Staff #47) on September 15, 2025 at 11:29 AM. Staff #47 stated that the gray basin which was covered with white towel and located on the top of the medication cart contained apple sauce, acidophilous (probiotic), and ensure (supplement). She stated that she keeps the bottle of lactobacillus acidophilous in the basin to keep it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation, staff interviews, and facility policies the facility failed to ensure that two staff members (#21, and #58) are educated on infection control and prevention. The deficient practice could result in staff not being familiar with process and procedures for the control and prevention of infection. Findings include:-Regarding Staff #21Review of the personnel record for a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #21) revealed a hire date of August 1, 2024. Additionally, the personnel file revealed a signed job description dated August 4, 2024 that outlined tasks and responsibilities which stated that staff will participate in all required meetings, trainings and events. The file also included a New Employee Orientation Acknowledgement signed August 4, 2025. However, it did not indicate what training were covered under this orientation. Further review of the personnel file provided by the facility did not reveal any evidence that staff #21 completed Infection Control training. Review of the Inservice training log/binder conducted on September 15, 2025 at 4:03 p.m. did not reveal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation, staff interviews, and facility policies the facility failed to ensure that five staff members (#21, #58, #1, #55 & #11) received Dementia Care training. The deficient practice could result in staff not being familiar with process and procedures to care for residents with dementia.Findings include:On September 15, 2025 at 9:11 a.m., a written request for personnel files which included staffs #21, #58, #24, #1, #55 & #11) was submitted specifically asking for proof of training for Dementia Care. -Regarding Staff #21Review of the personnel record for a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #21) revealed a hire date of August 1, 2024. Additionally, the personnel file revealed a signed job description dated August 4, 2024 that outlined tasks and responsibilities which stated that staff will participate in all required meetings, trainings and events. The file also included a New Employee Orientation Acknowledgement signed August 4, 2025. However, it did not indicate what training were covered under this orientation. Further review of the personnel file provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and facility policy, the facility failed to protect the residents' (#26, #24, #4, and #6) right to be free from physical abuse by a resident. The deficient practice could result in physical and psychosocial harm.Regarding Resident #26 and Resident #24:-Resident #26 was admitted to the facility November 6, 2023, with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, prediabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, cardiomegaly, delirium due to known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, bradycardia, and adult failure to thrive.An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section C revealed the resident had inattention and disorganized thinking. Section E revealed the resident had wandering behavior that occurred daily.A care plan dated November 15, 2023, revealed the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving two residents (#37 and #42) was reported to the State Agency. Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving two residents (#37 and #42) was reported to the State Agency (SA).Findings include:Regarding Resident #37Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The care plan, focusing on behavior, dated May 2, 2023, revealed the resident frequently misplaced items accusing others of taking them, and then needed help finding them. Review of a progress note dated June 27, 2025, indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure a complete investigation involving an alleged violation with two residents (#37 and #42) was conducted.Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure a complete investigation involving an alleged violation with two residents (#37 and #42) was conducted. Findings include:Regarding Resident #37Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The care plan, focusing on behavior, dated May 2, 2023, revealed the resident frequently misplaced items accusing others of taking them, and then needed help finding them. Review of a progress note dated June 27, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of facility documentation, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement their policy to report and investigate allegations of neglect for one resident (#8) and failed to protect a reporter from retaliation. The deficient practice could result in allegations of neglect not being reported and investigated timely, which could result in continuing neglect. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-polio syndrome, chronic pain syndrome, asthma, and dyspnea. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview or Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Additionally, Section E revealed that the resident had no potential indicators of psychosis, and no physical behavioral symptoms. A physician order dated February 12, 2025, at 10:58 AM, indicated to send Resident #8 to the emergency room (ER)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of facility documentation, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to assess a resident for a change of condition timely, and provide timely transfer to emergency services for one resident (#8). Additionally, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for administration of oxygen therapy according to professional standards for one resident (#8). The deficient practice could result in a delay of care for a resident, leading to a worsening medical condition, and could lead to a physician not being aware of a resident's respiratory status regarding oxygen use. Findings Include: -Regarding resident assessment and timely transfer to emergency services for Resident #8: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-polio syndrome, chronic pain syndrome, asthma, and dyspnea. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview or Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of facility documentation, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one resident (#8) regarding administration of oxygen therapy dose. The deficient practice could result in an incomplete medical record which could lead to interdisciplinary team members not being aware of a resident's respiratory status regarding oxygen use. Findings Include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-polio syndrome, chronic pain syndrome, asthma, and dyspnea. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview or Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Section O indicated that the resident was not receiving oxygen therapy on admission or while a resident. Review of the O2 Sats Summary log revealed the resident was on room air on all log entries except the following entries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that four residents (#24, #68, #10, #12) were free from physical abuse. The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include: Regarding Resident #24 -Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on September 30, 2023 with a re-admission date of October 3,2023. Resident passed away on October 9, 2023 with diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with mood disturbance, major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified, anxiety disorder, unspecified, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified. A review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated June 22, 2023 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 06, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (#1) was not abused by another resident (#2). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally harmed. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, delirium, depression, and anxiety. The OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The assessment also revealed that the resident was exhibiting behavioral symptoms including physical and verbal on one to three days, and utilized a wheelchair and walker for mobility. A skin assessment dated [DATE], revealed that there was a resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of two residents (#24 and #15) to be free abuse by residents (#6 and #34). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and mentally harmed. Findings include: Regarding resident #24 and #6 -Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia, unspecified affecting the right dominant side, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. A care plan dated July 12, 2021 revealed the resident had the potential to demonstrate physical and verbal behaviors (hitting and swearing, threatening) related to poor cognition and understanding of situations. Interventions included that when the resident becomes agitated, intervene before agitation escalates; guide away from the source of distress; engage calmly in conversation; and if the resident was aggressive, staff were to walk away, and approach later. The care plan dated January 28,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on concerns identified during the survey, review of the facility assessment, staff interviews, Quality Assurance (QA) documentation, and policy review, the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to ensure the director of nursing (DON) attended the QAA meeting. The deficient practice can result in quality care concerns not being identified and corrected. Findings include: During the survey which was conducted on June 3, 2024 through June 6, 2024, concerns were identified regarding the attendance of the director of nursing during QAA meeting. Review of the facility document titled, QAPI Attendance Record revealed that on January 25, 2024 the executive director, medical director, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), and others revealed a signature for each attendee except the pharmacy consultant. But for the months of February through May 2024, the document revealed the DON's QAPI Attendance Record signature was left blank. Furthermore, a review of the facility document titled, Facility Assessment revealed a list of Persons involved in completing assessment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#31) was able to make choices about their care. The deficient practice could result in residents being denied the right to make their own choices. Findings include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spondylolisthesis, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and osteoarthritis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment from 02/29/2024, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 which suggested moderate cognitive impairment. There was no evaluation of bathing ability due to the bathing activity not being performed in the lookback period. Care plan initiated on 10/13/2022 had a goal for a performance deficit for activities of daily living (ADL) related to her diagnoses. It documented that she is bedfast most of the time and interventions included encouraging resident to participate to the fullest extent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, facility documentation and policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#304) was free from abuse by another resident (#20). Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (CVA), epilepsy, traumatic brain injury (TBI), major depressive disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the care plan initiated on January 28, 2022 and revised on April 4, 2022 revealed that resident #20 have a psychosocial well-being problem related to anxiety, ineffective coping, lack of acceptance to current condition, TBI, schizophrenia, verbal and physical aggression. It also stated that he had been involved in altercation with peer. The interventions initiated on January 29, 2022 included need of assistance/encouragement/support to identify problems that cannot be controlled, and identify precipitating factor(s)/stressors. Another care plan initiated on July 12, 2021 revealed resident #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving abuse were reported within required timeframe for one resident (#16). Findings include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiomegaly, and dementia. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment from 01/18/2024 revealed resident #16 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was unable to be assessed due to the resident being rarely or never understood. Staff assessment indicated there were short- and long-term memory problems and resident's cognitive skills were severely impaired. There was no fall history documented. Review of care plan initiated on 12/02/2019 reveal that resident #16 did have a goal related to her risk for falls with interventions that were updated after her 03/23/2024 fall which included being on the Falling Leaf…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#27) received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene. The deficient practice may cause a decline or decrease in a resident's quality of life. Findings include: Resident #27 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included myotonic muscular dystrophy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and major depressive disorder. Care plan initiated on 02/04/2023 had a goal for a performance deficit for activities of daily living (ADL) related to her diagnoses. Interventions included encouraging resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction, use the call light to call for assistance, and assistance with bathing/showering per bath schedule preference and as necessary. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment from 04/04/2024 revealed resident #27 the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13 which indicated no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure baseline care planning as required for 4 residents (#1, #62, #64, and #88). The sample was 35 residents. The deficient practice could result in lack of resident involvement in the plan of care. Findings Include: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acquired absence of left leg above knee, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the clinical record did not reveal documentation that the facility provided the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan as required. An interview was conducted on December 8, 2022 at 1:27 p.m. with the [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (staff #84). She stated the baseline care planning was not completed as required for Resident #1. -Resident #62 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, pneumonia, acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#47) or resident's representative was able to participate in the care planning process. The sample was 35 resident. The deficient practice could result in residents and representatives not participating in and understanding their plan of care. Findings include: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, hypertension, and major depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a staff assessment for mental status which indicated the resident had some difficulty making decisions in new situations. Review of the care plan dated April 6 2020 for impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia, short-term memory loss included the intervention that resident needs supervision/assistance with all decision making. Review of facility documentation did not reveal documentation to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy, the facility failed to ensure that an appropriate level of supervision was provided for one resident (#8) resulting in two another residents (#24 and #6) being slapped and grabbed. The sample was 7 residents. The deficient practice could result in other residents being physically harmed. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, unspecified intellectual disabilities, unspecified mood affective disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 8 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the progress notes revealed the following: -January 28, 2022 a registered nurse (RN) notified that this resident struck another peer in the arm. Staff member states that resident was walking down the hall when the resident struck peer in the arm without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide urinary catheter care as ordered to one resident (#64). Three residents were reviewed for urinary catheter/Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The deficient practice could result in complications with indwelling urinary catheters, including infection. Findings Include: -Resident #64 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease, flaccid neuropathic bladder, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was always incontinent and required total assist for toileting. Review of the physician's orders for August 23, 2022 revealed: -An order for a Foley Catheter Size 16 french/30 cubic centimeter (cc) balloon. -An order for catheter care with soap & water or wipes every shift for flaccid neuropathic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, personnel record review, facility assessment review, and policy, the facility failed to ensure 2 staff (#26 and #89) possessed the competencies and skills needed to care for residents with behaviors. The deficient practice could result in a delayed and inappropriate response to deescalate behaviors. Findings include: Staff #26 was hired as a licensed nursing assistant (LNA) on November 23, 2021. Review of the employee's personnel record did not reveal that she had completed behavior intervention training. Review of the staff's time card revealed that staff #26 worked October 23, 2022 from 5:57 a.m. to 7:07 p.m. -Staff #89 was hired as a licensed practical nurse (LPN) on August 11, 2022 and resigned on October 26, 2022. Review of the employee's personnel record did not reveal that she had completed behavior intervention training. Review of the staff's time card revealed that staff #89 worked on October 23, 2022 from 5:57 p.m. to 6:04 a.m. Review of a 5-day written investigation report dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#64) receiving psychotropic medications received consistent monitoring for behaviors and side effects; failed to document the use of non pharmacologic interventions; and failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication had a duration for treatment. Five residents were reviewed for medication use. The deficient practice could result in unnecessary medication use and adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident #64 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease, anxiety disorder, and depression. A psychotropic medication informed consent form dated April 28, 2022 was reviewed for Ativan (Lorazepam) which included the medication class as an antianxiety and the target symptoms as restlessness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed: a staff assessment of mental status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to notify one resident (#1), or the resident's representative, and ombudsman in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge. The sample size was 1. The deficient practice could result in residents not knowing their discharge rights. Findings include: -Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acquired absence of left leg above knee, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments revealed a discharge, return anticipated assessment dated [DATE]. The coding included that it was an unplanned discharge to a acute hospital. Review of a nurse's progress note dated October 14, 2022 included the resident stated that she wanted to go to the hospital because she felt that her kidneys were blocked. The nurse called the on call physician and tried to get an order. The Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to notify one resident (#1), or the resident's representative of the bedhold and reserve bed payment policies at the time of transfer/discharge to the hospital. The sample size was 1. The deficient practice could result in residents not knowing their discharge rights. Findings include: -Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acquired absence of left leg above knee, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments revealed a discharge, return anticipated assessment dated [DATE]. The coding included that it was an unplanned discharge to a acute hospital. Review of a nurse's progress note dated October 14, 2022 included the resident stated that she wanted to go to the hospital because she felt that her kidneys were blocked. The nurse called the on call and tried to get an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents (#62 and #64). The sample was 35 residents. The deficient practice could result in inadequate assessment of resident needs. Findings include: -Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of a comprehensive/admission MDS dated [DATE] included that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be conducted. There was no information documented for the BIMS and the BIMS score was dashed/- which meant it was not assessed. The staff assessment for mental status was not completed. The assessment included the Mood interview should be completed. Each section of the Mood interview was dashed/-. The staff assessment of mood was not completed. The assessment included the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents (#1 and #64). The sample was 35 residents. The deficient practice could result in inadequate assessment of resident needs. Findings include: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acquired absence of left leg above knee, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: The Brief Interview for Mental Status should have been completed, however, the interview questions were left blank and the score has a dash/not assessed. The staff assessment for mental status was not completed. The mood interview should have been conducted, however, all of the mood questions and the severity score contain dashes. The staff assessment of mood questions were not assessed. The pain assessment interview should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and job description, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The deficient practice could result in lack of appropriate activity programs for residents. Findings include: A review of the personnel file for the activity director (AD/staff #5) revealed she was hired on June 24, 2020 as an activity assistant, but was identified by the facility as the Activity Manager. Further review of the file did not reveal any experience in a social, recreational, or therapeutic activities program. The personnel file also revealed no evidence of completion of a course and certification in therapeutic activities. A review of the facility staff list revealed that staff #5 was the Activities Manager. During an interview conducted on December 7, 2022 at 11:49 a.m. with human resources (staff #32), ten employee files were reviewed and he identified staff #5 as the Activities Manager. An interview was conducted on December 8, 2022 at 11:43 a.m. with the [NAME] President of Clinical Operations/Regional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to assess for interventions for identified decreased Range of Motion (ROM)/contractures for one resident (#64) of two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving required services and a further decline in resident status. Findings Include: -Resident #64 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a care plan focus dated April 28, 2022 revealed the resident had impaired functional mobility with a goal to remain free from complications of impaired range of motion. The interventions included to report and document any declines in ability and to refer to therapy as necessary. Review of Occupational Therapy (O.T.) notes for start of care April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide pain management in a timely manner in accordance with physician's orders for one resident (#289). The sample size was 6 residents. The deficient practice could result in resident's pain not being managed timely. Resident #289 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included scoliosis surgery, fusion of spine, and hypertension. Review of the clinical record revealed the following physicians orders: -Oxycodone Tablet 5 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain level of 6 to 10. Order dated 11/22/22 10:00 am -Tylenol Extra Strength Tablet 500 mg (Acetaminophen) 2 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Pain Scale 1-5, not to exceed 3mg per 24/hour period. Order dated 11/22/22 9:54am Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident received extensive assistance on all activities of daily living (ADLs) attempted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed in regard to food served. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of nutritional problems and dissatisfaction with their meals. Findings include: Resident #189 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diverticulosis, anemia and hypertension. Review of the residents discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident had a mild cognitive deficit. Review of the facility documentation of an event (date not listed) revealed that the menu called for tuna salad, chips, sliced tomatoes, banana pudding and choice of beverage. However, the facility cook served potato salad sandwiches and a bag of chips. The facility was unable to provide documentation that a change in the menu was approved by a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN). An interview was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-06-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 54.7-3.7 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ROBERTSON, BRETTIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
SAMUELIAN, ROBERTIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
SAMUELIAN, SPENCERIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
SAMUELIAN, STEPHENIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
SEASTRAND, JASONIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2015
WEST, CHRISTIANIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
HAVEN HEALTH PROPERTIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2015
HAVEN LAKESIDE REAL ESTATE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2015
ESPINOSA, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
FRAGOSO, LINDSAYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
CLARK GLOBALMED, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
HEALTH GROUP MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/25/2024
CLARK, RANDOLPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2015
FAIR, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/21/2019
HANSEN, CALEBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/20/2023
LONGHURST, STOCKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$746K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 14%Other / private 18%

This home reported $746K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$9,990per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$374per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arizona
$8,365/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,437/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,250/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035277. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next