Haven Of Tucson

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 306 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 101.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered laboratory and intravenous treatment was administered as ordered; and failed to ensure the physician was notified of a critical laboratory result for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#22). This deficient practice resulted in the resident not receiving the prescribed and appropriate treatment needed, resulting in further decline.Findings include:Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the upper lobe right bronchus or lung, malignant pleural effusion, and pneumonia. The care plan dated November 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was at malnutrition status related to diagnoses of emphysema, pneumonia, dementia, acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and malignant neoplasm of the right lung. Interventions included diet and supplements as ordered. A 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], included that the resident was cognitively intact and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-03-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#127) received care and services to restore and/or maintain continence. The sample size was 18. The deficient practice could adversely impact the resident's dignity and result in bowel and bladder continence not being maintained. Findings include: Resident #127 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of sacrum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region and retention of urine. An indwelling catheter care plan dated 02/14/23 related to acute neurogenic bladder had a goal to be/remain free from catheter-related trauma. Interventions included to monitor/document for pain/discomfort due to catheter. The 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating intact cognition. She required extensive 2+ person physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that one shower room was maintained in a clean and safe condition in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents by failing to provide a clean, safe, and homelike environment. The sample was 1 of 1 and the census was 121.Findings Include:Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, respiratory failure, and other comorbid conditions.Resident #15 was one of the residents on the Heritage 200 hallway who had recently received a tracheostomy due to respiratory failure. According to a resident minimum data set (MDS) assessment submitted by the facility to the state agency data system on April 22, 2026, Resident #15 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15.During the initial visitation on April 19, 2026 at 10:50 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident was referred for a level II Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASRR). The universe was 21. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the appropriate level of care needed to achieve their highest and practicable wellbeing.Findings include:Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment. The same MDS also indicated Resident #77 had Bi-polar disorder and schizoaffective disorder. It further indicated he was taking antidepressant medications.The Order Summary Report for Resident #77 revealed he was taking Risperidone oral tablet 3 milligrams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident, #4, was monitored and assessed for changes in her condition. The universe was 21. The deficient practice could lead to residents having an adverse health event as a result of not being monitored adequately.Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes, dysphagia, and renal and perinephric abscess.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 which indicated Resident #4 had moderate cognitive impairment. The same MDS also indicated Resident #4 had no history of falls prior to her admission.A Weekly Skin Check and Wound Assessment, dated April 8, 2026 at 4:20 P.M. made no notation regarding a bruise on the upper right arm.A shower sheet, dated April 11, 2026 indicated Resident #4 had a bruise to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA/Staff#98) maintained current Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and First Aid certification. The facility also failed to follow its policy requiring one Registered Nurse (RN/Staff#90) to remain in non-probationary status. The deficient practice could place residents at risk for delayed or ineffective emergency response and for receiving care that does not meet accepted standards of care.Findings include:Review of a personnel file for a CNA, Staff #46, revealed a hire date of [DATE], and a CNA job description signed on [DATE]. The signed job description revealed that an Active, Class-Instructed CPR Certification was a Minimum Requirement for the position. Continued review of the personnel file revealed evidence that Staff #46 obtained and maintained a CPR and First Aid certification. Review of a personnel file for a CNA, Staff #98, revealed a hire date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to implement its policy to ensure that an allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 residents was reported to all applicable state agencies. The deficient practice could result in further allegations of neglect not being reported.Findings include: Resident # 1 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, intracerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not completed due to Resident #1 rarely or never understood and his cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The MDS documented that the resident is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene.A comprehensive care plan revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 residents was investigated. The deficient practice could result in further neglect of residents and appropriate corrective actions not being taken. Findings include: Resident # 1 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, intracerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarct affecting left non-dominant side.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not completed due to Resident #1 being rarely or never understood. The MDS documented his cognitive skills for daily decision making as severely impaired. The MDS also revealed that the resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene.A comprehensive care plan revised on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that monitoring and evaluation of physical restraints are completed for the continued use of physical restraints for one resident (Resident #62). The deficient practice could lead to increased isolation and/or other psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident #62 was initially admitted into the facility on April 16, 2024, and then re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit. A review of a care plan focus initiated on August 13, 2024 revealed that Resident #62 used a form of physical restraints, bilateral soft mitts. The focus also revealed interventions to ensure the resident is positioned correctly with proper body alignment while restrained, and, as well as monitoring and assistance every 2 hours for daily care. An order dated August 13, 2024 revealed that staff will ensure proper placement of bilateral soft mitts are released every two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met during medication administration. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection and undesirable medication- induced harm. The facility census was 106, and there were 22 sampled residents. Findings include: A medication administration observation was conducted on December 17, 2024 at 7:32 A.M. with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff #242). The LPN was observed to dispense a Mirapex tablet into his ungloved hand, split the tablet in half while his hands continued to be ungloved. The LPN then placed the medication into a clear medication cup, placing the residual half of the tablet into an unlabeled medication cup and stored it in the medication cart, stating to save for the afternoon. The LPN was also observed to reach into a medication cup with ungloved hands to retrieve a medication that the resident refused and disposed of the medication in the resident's room trash, then administered the rest of the medications. An interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of clinical records, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#46) received assistance to maintain hearing ability. This deficient practice can result in in-effective communication. Findings Include, Resident # 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of a right pelvic fracture, atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant therapy, anxiety, depression, and lack of coordination. The resident's inventory dated November 27, 2024 failed to list hearing aids under the resident's personal property. The resident's order dated November 27, 2024 revealed the resident could be seen by an audiologist. The care plan dated November 27, 2024 with the download date of December 16, 2024, revealed no focus, goals, or interventions for resident's hearing. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#149) was not discharged with an unnecessary device. this deficient practice could result in infection and increased risks of death. Resident #149 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, Klebsiella pneumoniae and type 2 diabetes. This resident was discharged to an assisted living facility on February 6, 2024. A care plan initiated on January 16, 2024 included that the resident was on Antibiotic Therapy including Meropenem for a urinary tract infection. Interventions included to observe for possible infection every shift. A physician's order dated January 16, 2024 included Meropenem (antibiotic) Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1 gram Use 1 gram intravenously every 8 hours for urinary tract infection for 3 Days was discontinued on January 19, 2024. A review of the clinical record did not find any medications administered intravenously after January 19, 2024. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ