Haven Of Phoenix

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 106.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (#5) by not properly securing the resident and failing to maintain a safe speed during transport. The deficient practice could result in residents being physically injured.Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on December 28, 2023, with a diagnosis including infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis, subsequent encounter, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of the Care Plan, date-initiated December 18, 2023, revealed a focus for fall risk related to generalized weakness. Interventions included anticipating and meeting the residents' needs and following the facility's fall protocol. Further review of the care plan identified a focus for anticoagulant therapy. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of records, observation, interviews, policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#122 and #163) were not abused by another resident (#121 and #60) out of 11 sampled residents. The Universe was 99. The deficient practice could lead to physical and psychosocial harm to residents.Regarding the altercation between Resident #121 and Resident #122-Regarding #121, (Alleged Perpetrator) Resident #121 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, anxiety, and bipolar disorder.A Physical Aggression incident report dated April 27, 2026, at 5:35 p.m., revealed that a Nurse was notified of an incident involving Resident #121 (alleged perpetrator) and #122 (alleged victim), who shared a room. The note included that the nurse entered the room and observed Resident #121 screaming it's my walker, and physically hitting Resident #122 in the right upper extremity. The note indicated that the residents were separated, and Resident #121 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered for two of five sampled residents (Resident #32 and #56). The deficient practice could result in resident's pain not being controlled.Regarding Resident #32: Resident #32 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; bipolar disorder; major depressive disorder; and anxiety disorder. A care plan focus dated February 24, 2025, revealed Resident #32 had polyneuropathy pain. Interventions included that the staff were to anticipate his need for pain relief and respond as soon as possible. A physician's order dated October 8, 2025, revealed Resident #32 is to take one 325 mg tablet of oxycodone-acetaminophen every 5 hours as needed for pain levels of 6 to 10. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #32 had a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical records, staff interviews, review of the Blood Glucose Monitoring System User's Guide, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that staff conducted proper hand sanitizing during a meal service and infection control procedures were performed after a point of care testing for blood sugar check, for one resident (#164) to help prevent a transmission of infections according to acceptable clinical standards of practice. The census was 99. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infectious diseases to other residents and could place the residents at risk for infection.Findings include: -Regarding Following Hand Hygiene: An observation of residents in the dining room was conducted on April 4, 2026 at 7:38 AM. There were a total of five Residents having breakfast and one staff member (#37) a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assisting the residents. Each of the Residents were sitting at their own table. Residents had their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of the clinical records, staff interviews, and from the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (pre-admission screening and resident review) was updated appropriately and accurately submitted, when applicable, for one resident (#32). The census was 99. The deficient practice could result in residents' medically related social and emotional needs not being met. The census was 99.Findings include:Resident #32 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses that included Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 5-day assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the Resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed. The Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15.0, indicating that the Resident was cognitively intact. The assessment also revealed that no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to one resident (#137) consistent with professional standards of practice, and the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan. The deficient practice could place the resident's health at risk by not adequately treating the resident's pain.Findings include:Resident #137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included aftercare following a joint replacement surgery and fibromyalgia.The assessment for Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/03/2026, revealed a score of 12.0, indicating that the Resident was moderately impaired.A review of the physician's pain medication orders revealed an order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 MG (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain level of 4-6 and give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain level of 7-10; and Ibuprofen oral tablet 200 MG give 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy documentation, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing information posted included all data requirements. The deficient practice could result in residents and visitors not being informed of accurate and current staffing information. Findings include:An observation on May 3, 2026, at 6:59 AM, of the staff postings for May 3, 2026, included the number of certified nursing assistants (CNAs), the number of restorative nursing assistants (RNAs), the number of registered nurses (RNs), the number of licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and the number of medication technicians, categorized by shift. There was no evidence of an area where the actual hours worked by staff could be completed. A review of randomly chosen days of staff postings compared with the staff assignment sheets revealed that none of the staff postings matched the actual number of staffs that worked.Review of the Daily Staffing reports revealed the following missing data requirements.- May 23, 2025, revealed no evidence of the calculation of actual hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left at the bedside for one (#56) of 29 sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in harm to the residents, and/or visitors who have access to medications.Findings include:Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphagia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, hypertension, and anxiety.An admission evaluation record dated November 18, 2026, revealed that the resident did not desire to self-administer drugs.A quarterly Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition.There was no evidence in the progress notes of an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting related to medication self-administration.During an initial observation of Resident #56's room on May 03, 2026, at 08.47 a.m., a bottle of Soursop [NAME] supplement for gut…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This deficient practice could have resulted in the activities provided not meeting the assessed needs of the residents. Findings Include: A review of the personnel file for the role of activity manager (AD/Staff #111) was conducted on May 21, 2024. However, the review did not reveal evidence that staff #111 possessed the qualifications required for the role of activities director. An interview was conducted on January 23, 2025, at 9:38 A.M. with staff #111, Activities Director. Staff #111 stated that she had been working at the facility as an Activities Director for several years. She stated that as an activities manager, she visited the residents, providing them with menus that included the activities of the day as well as the food menu. She also stated that she oversaw the smoke break. An interview was conducted on January 23, 2025, at 9:43 A.M. with staff #41, Human Resources. She was asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documents, staff interviews, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#395) was free from neglect, by failing to ensure the resident was administered care and services to meet his needs. The deficient practice could result in residents not being provided the necessary services. Findings include: Resident #395 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included osteomyelitis, sepsis, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, quadriplegia, extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance, urinary tract infection, protein calorie malnutrition, and major depressive disorder. A care plan initiated on [DATE] revealed that the resident had bowel incontinence related to inability to control bowels. Interventions indicated included check resident every two hours and assist with toileting as needed. A laboratory result dated [DATE] indicated that Coranavirus was not detected.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (#82) had a referral for a Level II PASRR (pre-admission screening and resident review).The deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving specialized services needed. Findings include: Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, post- traumatic stress disorder, and depression. Review of the clinical record revealed a Level I pre-admission screening and resident review (PASSR) dated November 27, 2024. Upon review of the document, the box indicating that a referral for Level II determination for mental illness (MI) only was selected. There was also boxes that were selected indicating that the resident had major depression, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The form was signed and dated. Additional review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-12-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $877K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ