Haven Of Saguaro Valley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 98.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.85 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.00 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that blood pressure medication was administered in accordance with physician ordered parameters for 1 out of 3 sampled residents (Resident # 1). The deficient practice could result in uncontrolled blood pressure. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that include fractures of T11-12, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute pulmonary edema, other heart failure, and cardiomegaly. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed an active diagnosis of Orthostatic Hypotension and Hypertension.An order initiated on November 13, 2025, for Midodrine HCL 5 milligrams (MG) 2 tablets by mouth every 8 hours for orthostatic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure bowel and bladder care was provided for one resident (#3) out of 3 sampled. The deficient practice could result in skin breakdown and possible formation of pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on September 30, 2024 with diagnosis including essential hypertension, major depressive disorder-recurrent, peripheral vascular disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, occlusion and stenosis of the left carotid artery, benign prostatic hyperplasia without urinary tract symptoms, pressure induced deep tissue damage of the sacral region and anxiety disorder. A review of the 5-day MDS (minimum data set) dated September 15, 2024 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the care plan revealed a focus area of bladder incontinence due to impaired mobility. The interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free from abuse. The deficient practice could result in further resident abuse. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, cardiomegaly, weakness, heart failure and type II diabetes. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 12 indicating the resident had intact cognition. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident will require 24/7 supervision upon discharge; and that, the resident will be discharge to an assisted living. The physician's history and physical revealed the resident had an increase need of assistance with activities of daily living such as continence care and medical assistance such as medication administration. The social services progress note dated March 11, 2022 revealed that there had been an ongoing issue between the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions and proper hand hygiene was implemented during incontinence care. The sample size was one. The deficient practice could result in transmission of infections to residents. Findings include: An observation of incontinence care was conducted with a certified nurse assistant (CNA/staff#60) and a licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #91) on October 18, 2023 at 4:45 p.m. The LPN performed pericare and brief change while the CNA assisted the resident on her right side. During the observation, the LPN donned a clean pair of disposable gloves and then touched the resident. However, the LPN did not perform hand hygiene prior to donning of gloves. The LPN then removed the wet incontinent brief, placed it in a trash bag and cleaned the resident's perineal area. The LPN then proceeded to apply the new and clean incontinent brief on the resident using the same pair of gloves she used for pericare and handling of the soiled incontinent brief. The LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 66 and the sample was 17. The deficient practice could result in resident not provided with advanced care activities to meet their needs. Findings include: The Facility Assessment with completion dated of February 1, 2023 revealed tan average daily census range of 90-105. Staffing planning included one FT (full time) DON (director of nursing), wound nurse, admission nurse, unit manager; and, two FT MDS (minimum data set) nurses. Per the assessment there should be at least one RN per 24-hour period; individual nursing staff assignments was based on patient care needs and individual staff needs/training; and that, nursing shifts are twelve hours with a goal of consistent assignments. Review of facility punch detail for registered nurses for March and April 2023 revealed no evidence of RN coverage on the following dates: -March 11, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24, 25 and 30; and,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the responsible party was notified of a fall with injury for one resident (#186). The deficient practice could result in required decisions regarding treatment and care not made timely. Findings include: Resident #186 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the brain, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations. A face sheet included that this resident had a Power of Attorney (POA) for financial and care. A care plan dated September 30, 2022 included that the resident was at risk for falls and injury An incident note dated November 2, 2022 included that the resident was on the floor with small pool of blood from a small cut to the right eyebrow. Per the documentation, pressure was and a small band-aid was applied to injury; and that, the director of nursing (DON) and the unit manager (UM) were notified of fall. Further review of the clinical record revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure intervention was implemented to prevent a fall for one resident (#29). The sample size was 19. The deficient practice may result in avoidable accidents. Findings include: -Resident #29 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of COVID-19, weakness and unspecified lack of coordination. The baseline care plan dated February 17, 2023 included the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness and history of falls; and, was at risk for ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance. Goal included that the resident will be free of falls and will safely perform ADLs. Interventions included following facility fall protocoal and call light within reach. The history and physical note dated February 20, 2023 included the resident subsequently fell twice, the most recent fall was 3 days ago; and that, the resident reported that he was losing his balance easily and his legs were giving in even though he was using a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#11) was free from unnecessary pain medications. The deficient practice could result in residents experiencing adverse side effects. Findings Include: Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of pubic fracture, pulmonary embolism and hypertension. The care plan dated January 19, 2023 revealed the resident was on opiate medication related to pelvic fracture. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and to monitor for side effects. Review of the physician order revealed for oxycodone (opioid narcotic) 5 mg (milligram) 1 tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain on a scale of 6-10. The MAR (Medication Administration Record) for February and March 2023 included that oxycodone was administered outside of the ordered pain parameter on the following dates: -February 11 at 8:18 p.m. for pain scale of 2; -February 18 at 8:23 p.m. for pain scale of 3; -March 24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that expired supplies and medications were not available for resident use. The census was 85. The deficient practice may result in ineffective treatments and/or in residents receiving the expired medications. Findings include: An observation of the #100 medication room was conducted on April 13, 2023 at 2:04 p.m. with a licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #80). There was a quadrivalent flucelvax (influenza vaccine) 2022-2023 formula, with an open date of March 8, 2023 written on the side of the box; and, two bags of 1000 ml (milliliters) 0.9% sodium chloride injection with a label that listed a resident who had been discharged from the facility in June, 2022. In an interview conducted with staff #80 immediately following the observation, the LPN stated that the influenza vaccine was good for 28 days after opening and should have been thrown out. The LPN also stated the two bags of sodium chloride injections should have been sent back to the pharmacy. An observation of the #200…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one resident (#53) regarding providing an assistive device. The sample size was 23. The deficient practice could result in residents' needs not being met. Findings include: Resident #53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of paraplegia, schizoaffective disorder and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder. Review of the Care Plan revised March 5, 2020 revealed the resident has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self Care Performance Deficit related to weakness, edema, incontinence, obesity, history of cellulitis, scoliosis, paraplegia, and a history of falls. The goal included the resident will improve their current level of function in eating. Interventions stated the resident requires limited assistance to eat, and to give the resident a cup with a sippy type lid to assist with fluid intake. An annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 2 on the Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $742K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ