Haven Of Globe

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 88.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 77.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.83 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.00 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (#96) rights to be free from staff-to-resident physical abuse. The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally harmed.Findings include:Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included encounter for palliative care, muscle spasms, atherosclerotic heart disease, malignant neoplasm of the cervix uteri, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, urinary incontinence, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, polyneuropathy, and generalized anxiety disorder.A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. A skin assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident did not have any skin impairments.Review of an alert charting progress note dated June 15, 2026, at 7:02 p.m. revealed that the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the abuse policy was implemented following an incident of staff-to-resident abuse for one resident (#96). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally harmed.Findings include:Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included encounter for palliative care, muscle spasms, atherosclerotic heart disease, malignant neoplasm of the cervix uteri, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, urinary incontinence, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, polyneuropathy, and generalized anxiety disorder.A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of an alert charting progress note dated June 15, 2026, at 7:02 p.m. revealed that the resident had activated her call light and that the certified nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an incident of staff-to-resident abuse was reported within the required timeframe for one resident (#96). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally harmed. Findings include:Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included encounter for palliative care, muscle spasms, atherosclerotic heart disease, malignant neoplasm of the cervix uteri, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, urinary incontinence, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, polyneuropathy, and generalized anxiety disorder.A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of an alert charting progress note dated June 15, 2026, at 7:02 p.m. revealed that the resident had activated her call light and that the certified nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an incident of staff-to-resident abuse involving one resident (#96) was thoroughly investigated. The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally harmed.Findings include:Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included encounter for palliative care, muscle spasms, atherosclerotic heart disease, malignant neoplasm of the cervix uteri, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, urinary incontinence, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, polyneuropathy, and generalized anxiety disorder.A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of an alert charting progress note dated June 15, 2026, at 7:02 p.m. revealed that the resident had activated her call light and that the certified nursing assistant (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policies, and review of the State Agency (SA) database, the facility failed to protect the rights of 3 out of 18 sampled residents (#92, #93, #8) to be free from physical and verbal abuse by another resident. The deficient practice could result in further resident abuse.Findings included:-Regarding Resident #92 (alleged victim) and Resident #12 (alleged perpetrator) -Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dementia, and blindness of one eye.Review of clinical records dated December 21, 2022 through December 29, 2022 revealed that the resident had to be redirected back to her room several times, and wandered multiple times throughout residents' rooms and on various hallways. wandering required supervision.A daily skilled evaluation progress note dated December 30, 2022 revealed that the resident required supervision and guidance due to intermittent periods of wandering,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, documentation and policy, the facility failed to report the results of abuse allegation investigations to the state survey agency within 5 working days of the incident for 2 of 18 sampled residents (#12, #92) in accordance to state law. The deficient practice could result in facilities not submitting investigation reports to the State Survey agency within 5 working days.Findings include:Regarding Resident #92-Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dementia, and blindness of one eye. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 99, which indicated that the assessment could not be completed. A Staff Assessment for Mental Status assessment revealed Short-Term and Long-Term memory problems, and severely impaired daily decision making. Review of clinical records dated December 21, 2022 through December 29, 2022 revealed that the resident had to be redirected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated, for 2 of 18 sampled residents (#12 and #92). The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being thoroughly investigated. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #92 (alleged victim) and Resident #12 (alleged perpetrator): -Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dementia, and blindness of one eye. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 99, which indicated that the assessment could not be completed. A Staff Assessment for Mental Status assessment revealed Short-Term and Long-Term memory problems, and severely impaired daily decision making. Review of clinical records dated December 21, 2022 through December 29, 2022 revealed that the resident had to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility assessment, facility documentation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the appropriate care to maintain safety, and the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care.Findings include:The PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) Staffing Data Report revealed that the facility consistently triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for all four quarters in 2025, and the first quarter of 2026. The facility assessment reviewed on June 9,2026, revealed the facility was licensed to provide care for 104 residents, had an average daily census of 78-85, and had an average number of 3-6 weekday admissions and 1-2 weekend admissions, and 2-5 weekday discharges and 0-3 weekend discharges. Staffing plan included the following:-full time Director of Nursing (DON)-full…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored, secure, and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents in accordance with facility policy, state, and federal laws for four of eighteen sampled residents (#5, #22, #69, #89). The universe was seventy-one. The deficient practice could lead to medications being incorrectly administered or accidentally ingested by a resident. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including bipolar disorder, current episode-depressed, dementia-unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, psychosis not due to a substance or known psychological condition, schizoaffective disorder, essential hypertension, edema, dermatitis, cellulitis and pruritis. A review of the annual MDS (minimum data set) dated March 23, 2026 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 99, indicating the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to ensure one out of eighteen sampled residents (#47) received treatment and care related to insulin and blood pressure medications in accordance with the provider's order, professional standards of practice and the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan. The deficient practice could place the residents' health at risk.Findings include:Resident #47 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis treatment. The Resident's care plan revealed that the Resident had diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The goal was for the Resident to have no complications related to his diagnoses of diabetes and hypertension. The interventions included for the staff to administer medications for diabetes and anti-hypertensive as ordered by the doctor, obtain fasting blood sugar test as ordered by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $618K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ