No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Haven Of Cottonwood

197 South Willard Street, Cottonwood, AZ 86326 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (928) 634-5548 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (928) 634-5548 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
340 S Willard St · (800) 656-7880 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
269 S Candy Ln · (928) 639-6635 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
740 E Mingus Ave · (928) 642-4680 · Call to confirm hours
Park
39 S Brian Mickelsen Pkwy · (928) 639-3200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
102 S Willard St · (928) 634-3645

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.6%10.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.5%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.9%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.3%12.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%21.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.1%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.2%10.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%87.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%23.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.8%10.4%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.5%CMS range 51.1–63.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.4–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.8–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
59.7%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 65.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.54 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.92 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-21)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure wounds were adequately assessed and monitored for one resident. The deficient practice could result in the clinical team not being fully aware of a resident's wound status and could lead to a delay of care for a worsening or non-healing wound.Findings include:Resident #10 was admitted to the facility December 10, 2024, with diagnoses that included atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with gangrene of left leg, polyneuropathy, and hypertension. The resident re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a new diagnosis of acquired absence of left leg below knee.A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not assessed for Resident #10.A physician order dated June 12, 2025, and discontinued July 18, 2025, indicated to complete a skin check weekly.A care plan dated April 11, 2025, revealed Resident #10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#11) was discharged in a manner that prevented accident hazards. The deficient practice resulted in a resident being inadvertently discharged with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in place, which could pose a risk of infection or potential misuse of the PICC line.Findings include:Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, extradural and subdural abscess, alcohol abuse with withdrawal, and generalized muscle weakness.Review of the care plan revealed a problem focus, dated April 19, 2025, which revealed that Resident #11 was receiving IV antibiotic medication. The goal in place for this focus was that the resident would not have any complications related to IV therapy. Interventions included administering IV per order via PICC line, changing the dressing per order, usage of EBP during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and safe environment in the residents' shower rooms, and in shared resident bathroom on the 200-Hall. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection and the failure to achieve a home-like environment. Findings include: A facility walkthrough was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor (Staff #302) and the Maintenance Manager (Staff #31) on May 19, 2025 at 08:58 a.m. to observe a resident shared restroom on the 200-Hall. All parties observed feces stuck to the inside of the commode, feces on the handrail, feces on the floor, dust and calcification in the toilet bowl, and a used and stained urinal (occupants of both rooms were females). During a facility walkthrough on May 19, 2025 at 9:15 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (Staff #302), an unlabeled blue chemical in a squirt bottle was observed on the handle near the commode in the 200-Hall shower room. The shower drains had soap scum and multiple strands of hair. The shower room vent was covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported timely to required entities for one resident (#326). The deficient practice could lead to ongoing abuse leading to harm of a resident. -Findings include: Resident #326 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypotension, unsteadiness on feet, degeneration of nervous system due to alcohol, and unspecified dementia. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A Health Status Note dated November 8, 2021, by a Registered Nurse (RN / Staff #112), revealed Resident #326 had a smoker's patch in place on the right arm. The resident stated rudely, If you people would let me smoke and let me out of here, I would be content!, as the resident raised his hand at the nurse. Staff #112 was startled and told the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of the State Agency (SA) database, staff interviews and review of policy and procedure facility failed to ensure two allegations of abuse (resident #171& #326) and an allegation of neglect (resident #26) were fully investigated. The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse and neglect not being investigated and abuse/neglect occurring in the facility. Findings include: Regarding Resident #26 -Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypotension, chronic kidney disease, and nocturia. A report was received by the State Agency on January 4, 2023 regarding an allegation of neglect. However, the report did not identify the alleged perpetrator. Review of the SA database revealed that the facility failed to submit a thorough investigation of the allegation to the SA. Furthermore, review of the facility's 5-day investigation report dated January 20, 2023 revealed that the investigation did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff and resident interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to assess and monitor the activities for one resident (#24). Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acquired absence of right leg above knee, depression, and anxiety disorder. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The activities care plan dated February 6, 2025 revealed that the resident spends his day in bed either watching TV, playing games on his phone or visit with family. Interventions included: -provide leisure supplies for self-directed pursuits. -introduce to other resident with similar interests, disabilities, and/or limitation. -modify daily schedule, treatment plan as needed to accommodate activity participation. -offer a variety of activity types and locations.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one resident (#34); and, failed to ensure one resident (#324) was free from preventable accidents of repeated falls. The deficient practice could result in avoidable accidents and/or decline in fuction. Findings include: - Regarding resident #34 Review of resident #34's hospital records prior to his admission to the facility revealed a progress note dated January 10, 2023 which documented that the resident is incompetent to make his own decision. The note indicated that the resident has a public fiduciary. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of mandible, tempomandibular joint disorder, and severe protein-calorie deficit. A speech therapy eval dated February 3, 2023 documented that the resident had a history of cognitive impairment and had a guardian. A progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 67 and the sample was 20. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving advanced care activities to meet their needs. Findings include: The Facility assessment dated of May 25, 2021, revealed an average daily census range of 38 - 42, with full capacity being 80 residents. Staffing planning included one FT (full time) DON (director of nursing), wound nurse, admission nurse, unit manager, and, an MDS (minimum data set) nurse. Per the assessment there should be at least one RN per 24-hour period; individual nursing staff assignments was based on patient care needs and individual staff needs/training; and that, nursing shifts are twelve hours with a goal of consistent assignments. The following dates were reviewed of the punch detail for registered nurses: -November 23 - 27, 2023; -February 16 - 19, 2024; -May 24 - 27, 2024; -August 30 - 31, 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure safeguards and systems were in place to ensure accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled substances. The deficient practice could result in inventory loss, and potential diversion. Findings include: An observation of the Medication Cart # 1 narcotic logbook was conducted on May 19, 2025 at approximately 8:09 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON/Staff # 56). The Shift to Shift Narcotic Sheet & Card Verification revealed the following for May 1 to May 19, 2025: - Count inconsistencies from May 1, 2025 through May 3, 2025. - 6 missed staff signature entries - Duplicate signature entries on May 18, 2025. - The date of May 2020 is written on the log sheet with the entries for May 17 - May 19. An interview was conducted with the DON on May 19, 2025 at approximately 8:09 a.m. The DON revealed the expectation is to have two licensed nurses to sign the log once narcotic count has been completed accurately. In an interview conducted on May 19, 2025 at 10:10 a.m. the Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation and policies, it was found that the facility failed to incorporate food safety, storage and hygiene. Findings Include: -Regarding food storage and expired food items: A kitchen observation was conducted with the morning cook (staff #20) on April 18, 2025 at 9:53 AM and revealed the following: - food items found in the refrigerator were beyond their use by date and food items were not sealed properly. -Within the large, three-door refrigerator,cooked bacon was discovered wrapped in tinfoil and lacked any date labeling. - A full one-pound plastic container of strawberries contained two strawberries exhibiting approximately one-inch diameter white colored substance. - A one-gallon plastic bag of lettuce was observed to be brown and wilted, and the bag was undated. - A second plastic bag of spring lettuce was unsealed and bore an illegible date. - A 32 ounce bag of green onions was unsealed and bore a May 2, 2025. - A carton containing multiple heads of green lettuce was observed, with a significant number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure that staff followed appropriate infection control practices. The deficient practice could result in a spread of preventable illness to residents and staff. Findings included: On May 19, 2025 at 11:03AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/Staff #64) was observed completing a resident's vitals near a nursing station. It was observed that Staff #64 did not sanitize or wash his hands before and after obtaining the resident's vital signs. Upon exiting the room the CNA was observed to write the vital signs of the resident on a clipboard and set the clipboard on the nursing station. Staff #64 was then observed entering another resident;s room without first sanitizing his hands. An interview was conducted on May 19, 2025 at 11:19AM with Staff #64, who stated that the facility's expectations regarding hand hygiene was to perform handwashing before and after providing care or coming in direct contact with a resident. Staff #64 also stated that hand hygiene and infection control practices are expected when obtaining the vitals of a resident. Staff #64 stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#326) was treated with respect and dignity. The deficient practice could lead to psychosocial harm of a resident. -Findings include: Resident #326 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypotension, unsteadiness on feet, degeneration of nervous system due to alcohol, and unspecified dementia. A Health Status Note dated November 8, 2021, by a Registered Nurse (RN / Staff #112), revealed Resident #326 had a smoker's patch in place on the right arm. The resident stated rudely, If you people would let me smoke and let me out of here, I would be content!, as the resident raised his hand at the nurse. Staff #112 was startled and told the resident to please settle down and stop acting like a a. Staff #112 offered to make the resident a sandwich, but, he settled with yogurt, and drank water. The resident was then resting peacefully. An admission minimum data set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (#47) consent was given prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication. The deficient practice could result in the resident not being informed of the risk and benefits of proposed care and not being given the opportunity to choose the care option of care he or she prefers. Findings include: Resident # 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, dementia with mood disturbance, anxiety, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 indicating the resident had impaired cognition. In addition, the Resident Mood Interview screening, revealed the resident scored a 0, indicating no concerns of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. The MDS revealed no evidence of high-risk drug classes for anti-anxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, staff interviews, review of facility documentation, policy and procedures and the State Agency (SA) database the facility failed to implement their policy regarding conducting thorough investigation of abuse/neglect allegation and protecting residents from further abuse for two residents (#26 and #171). The deficient practice could result in abuse/neglect continuing and not being prevented. Findings include: Regarding resident #26 (alleged victim) -Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypotension, chronic kidney disease, and nocturia. Review of the SA database revealed that a self-report was submitted by the facility on January 4, 2023. The report indicated an allegation of neglect. However, it did not detail information on what occurred nor did it indicate who the alleged perpetrator was. The report did not identify that the perpetrator was a staff member and whether the staff member was suspended pending an investigation. However, review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interviews, and review of facility process and policy the facility failed to ensure that all transfer/discharge notifications were made for one resident (#176). The deficient practice could lead to notifications of resident transfer/ discharge not being made to all required parties. Findings include: Resident #176 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's face sheet revealed that the resident #176 had a Public Fiduciary identified as his responsible party, guardian, and emergency contact. The face sheet also listed the contact information for the responsible party which included an office number, fax number, and e-mail address. A Discharge assessment dated [DATE] revealed the reason for the assessment as hospital transfer. The section Parties notified prior to transfer? indicated a check mark that responsible party was notified but did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required timeframe for one resident (#34). The deficient practice could result in delayed identification of potential risks and care needs. Findings include: Review of resident #34's hospital records prior to his admission to the facility revealed a progress note dated January 10, 2023 which documented that the resident is incompetent to make his own decision. The note indicated that the resident has a public fiduciary. A hospital progress note date January 24, 2023 documented that the resident had a history of cognitive impairment. The note indicated that resident was inpatient status at the hospital and needed long term care that can accommodate his needs. The note stated that the hospital was waiting on public fiduciary for assistance to place resident in a facility. Resident #34 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (#34) cognitive communication deficit was appropriately care planned and implemented. The deficient practice could result in a plan of care that does not meet the resident's needs. Findings include: Review of resident #34's hospital records prior to his admission to the facility revealed a progress note dated January 10, 2023 which documented that the resident is incompetent to make his own decision. The note indicated that the resident has a public fiduciary. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of mandible, tempomandibular joint disorder, and severe protein-calorie deficit. A speech therapy eval dated February 3, 2023 documented that the resident had a history of cognitive impairment and had a guardian. A progress note dated February 6, 2023 documented that the resident was a poor historian, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to meet the resident's needs for one resident (#324). The deficient practice could lead a resident not receiving care and services to meet their needs, which could lead to harm or injury. -Findings Include: Resident #324 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, personal history of traumatic brain injury, dementia, unspecified abnormality of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment that was not completed. Section J revealed the resident had two or more falls with injury since admission, re-entry, or prior assessment. A care plan initiated February 6, 2023, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and facility policy and process, the facility failed to ensure pain medications as needed (PRN) was administered within the Pain Parameters for one resident (#54). The deficient practice could result in residents being overmedicated. Findings include: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hepatic encephalopathy and alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites The order summery included Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Solution 20 mg/ml give 5 mg by mouth every 3 hours as needed for pain 7-10 ordered April 25, 2025. The medication administration record (MAR) dated May 2025 revealed that Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Solution 20 mg/ml give 5 mg by mouth every 3 hours as needed for pain 7-10 was administered on May 16, 2025 three times for a pain level of 6, 3, 6. An interview was conducted on May 20, 2025 at 11:33 a.m. with the registered nurse (RN/staff #3), who stated that an order for pain medication as needed (PRN) requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#94) did not receive medications against their wishes. This deficient practice can result in not respecting the rights of the resident. Findings include: Resident # 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, dementia with mood disturbance, anxiety, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. An order for one Bupropion HCL Extended release tablet for anxiety was dated May 11, 2025. According to the Medication Administration Record (MAR), 150 mg of Bupropion HCL ER was given to the resident for anxiety on May 11, 2025 - May 13, 2025. A progress note dated May 13, 2025, revealed the antidepressant was considered a good option and was started. The note further explains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that two of four sampled medication carts had medications stored according to professional standards. The deficient practice can result in cross-contamination of medications and medication errors. Findings include, During medication cart storage observation with the Director of Nursing (DON/Staff # 56), the following was observed on March 19, 2025 at 8:09 a.m. : Medication Cart # 1: -An unrefrigerated vial of Lorazepam 2 mg/ml , with the affixed label stating keep refrigerated, was located in the narcotic storage area of the cart. -A pink like solution was crusted on the outside of a Geri-Tussin bottle. -Product crusting was present on an opened and unlabeled sixteen-ounce bottle of Milk of Magnesia. - A bottle of Wild Cherry Pro-Stat with the open date of April 5, 2025 had a crusted solution extending down the sides of the bottle. - Geri-Lanta bottle was opened but not dated. -Pepto Bismol Ultra was opened and not dated. Medication Cart # 2 -A medicine cup, contained two tablets,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for one resident (#324) The deficient practice could lead to care team members not being aware of a resident's status, and could lead to missed or delayed treatment. -Findings Include: Resident #324 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, personal history of traumatic brain injury, dementia, unspecified abnormality of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment that was not completed. Section J revealed the resident had two or more falls with injury since admission, re-entry, or prior assessment. Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence of any neuro check logs for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of the clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#2) was provided care and services to meet professional standards regarding following physician orders for assessment of a resident post-fall. The deficient practice could lead to an injury being missed and a delay of care provided to a resident. -Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility January 10, 2025, and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pneumonia, end-stage renal disease, acute pulmonary edema, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left side, and dysarthria. An admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment, dated January 16, 2025, revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition. A physician order dated March 4, 2025, indicated for an x-ray of Resident #2's right arm to rule out a fracture. A progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete, accurate, and readily accessible for one resident (#55). The deficient practice could lead to care team members not having accurate, complete, and current resident information to coordinate care, which could lead to a decreased quality of care for residents. -Findings include: Resident #55 was admitted [DATE], and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system, urinary tract infection, functional quadriplegia, depression, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and conversion disorder. An admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 12, indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition. A care plan dated February 18, 2025 for the resident experiencing impacts of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care and services according to physician orders regarding weight monitoring for one resident (#10). The deficient practice could result in a residents not receiving treatment to meet their needs. -Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dysarthria, dysphagia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection. A care plan dated February 1, 2025, revealed that the resident was at risk for nutritional problems with an intervention to monitor weights per orders. A physician order dated February 1, 2025, indicated for an enteral feed of Osmolite 1.5 to start at 35 ml/hr to increase by 10 ml/r until goal of 65 ml/hr and 90 ml of free water flushes every 2 hours. A physician order dated February 1, 2025, indicated for Weekly Weights: On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, observations, policy review and the State Agency (SA) complaint tracking system, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#1 and #2) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to provide wound care as ordered by a physician. The sample size was 5. The deficient practice could lead to residents acquiring wound infections. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include osteoporosis, acute post-hemorrhagic anemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician's orders revealed resident #1 was to have wound care by cleaning the Right surgical area with normal saline, pat dry, and apply dressing at the surgical site once a day every three days.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation for a resident to resident complaint. The deficient practice could result in residents not being protected from further abuse and appropriate corrective action not taken. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including anemia, dysphagia, protein-calorie malnutrition, pulmonary fibrosis, macular degeneration, insomnia, intervertebral disk degeneration-lumbar region, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis-lumbar region, radiculopathy-lumbar region, mild cognitive impairment, age related osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, palmar fascial fibromatosis and depression. A review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated November 4, 2022 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15, suggesting the resident was cognitively intact. The facility final incident report dated January 10, 2023 revealed that an alleged incident of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to ensure that the electronic health record for resident #2 was complete and accurately documented. The deficient practice could result in incomplete and/or inaccurate clinical records. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on September 21, 2023 with diagnosis including pleural effusion, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites, congestive heart failure, thrombocytopenia, hypothyroidism, dorsalgia, anxiety disorder, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hepatorenal syndrome, urinary tract infection, chronic kidney disease, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review of the MDS (minimum data set) dated September 6, 2023 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 13 suggesting that the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the electronic health record for resident #1 revealed no evidence of a personal inventory form at admission or subsequent prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#41) received nail care as needed and showers, and one resident (#12) received assistance with showers as needed. The deficient practice could result in poor hygiene and infection. Findings include: Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, Type II diabetes, and acquired absence of the left leg below the knee. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating the resident had a moderate impairment. The assessment also included that the resident needed substantial/maximal assistance with bathing. Review of the care plan dated March 12, 2024 revealed that the resident was at risk for functional self-care deficits. Interventions included the resident required substantial/max-total assist to bathe. Review of the shower task sheet for the month of March 2024 revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, facility policy and procedures, and CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Certification) guidance, the facility failed to ensure that staff used appropriate enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for two residents (#23 and #172). The deficient practice could result in the transmission of infections to residents and staff. Findings include: -Resident #172 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute cystitis without hematuria and acute kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment included that indwelling catheter was not coded for resident #172. The nursing admission evaluation on April 2, 2024 revealed the resident was oriented to person, place, and situation and had bowel and bladder incontinence. The care plan dated April 3, 2024 included that the resident had an indwelling catheter for bladder outlet obstruction. Interventions included to change catheter as ordered and catheter care every shift. An observation was conducted on April 10, 2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician order for the use of an indwelling catheter for one resident (#172). The deficient practice could result in inappropriate use of an indwelling catheter for residents who do not need them. Findings included: Resident #172 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute cystitis without hematuria and acute kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment included that indwelling catheter was not coded for resident #172. The nursing admission evaluation on April 2, 2024 revealed the resident was oriented to person, place, and situation and had bowel and bladder incontinence. The care plan dated April 3, 2024 included that the resident had an indwelling catheter for bladder outlet obstruction. Interventions included to change catheter as ordered and catheter care every shift. Review of the catheter evaluation dated April 3, 2024 revealed the justification for use of indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-17 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to designate a qualified individual as the Infection Preventionist (IP) on an ongoing basis. The deficient practice could result in improper infection prevention practices in the facility. Findings include: An interview was conducted with the [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (staff/#68) and telephone interview with the Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist (RN/IP/staff #9) on November 17, 2022 at 11:26 AM. The IP stated that she comes in once a month to do rounds and the last time she was in the facility was at the end of September 2022. It was then stated that the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #25) is overseeing the day to day infection control and education. They stated the DON is not certified. A policy regarding Infection Control included that the facility will identify one or more individuals with training in infection control to provide on-site management of the infection prevention control program.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to develop a complete baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for three residents (#97, #102, and #147). The sample size was 19. The deficient practice could result in resident care needs not being met. Findings include: -Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included biventricular heart failure, lobar pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pleural effusion, acute pulmonary edema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the admission evaluation dated November 5, 2022 revealed the resident exhibited shortness of breath while lying flat, with exertion, and while sitting at rest and used oxygen (O2). Review of the November 5, 2022 physician's orders included: -O2 at 0-5 liters per minute (LPM) as needed to keep O2 saturation above 89%. -Albuterol Sulfate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement appropriate standard and transmission-based precautions. The deficient practice could result in transmission of infection. Findings include: An interview was conducted on November 14, 2022 at 10:07 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #25). She stated the residents in the rooms marked with signs were COVID-19 positive residents. She stated that you would need to don personal protective equipment (PPE), gown, gloves, N95 mask, and eye protection, from the supply cart in the hallway prior to entering the marked transmission-based precautions (TBP) rooms. She stated when you are finished in the TBP room, the PPE should be doffed and put in the receptacles in the hallway. The DON indicated an open trash can which contained discarded PPE including face shields, masks and gloves and a covered canister marked gowns only. She stated if the eye protection is to be re-used it would need to be disinfected with the provided disinfecting wipes. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the clinical record, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#98) had means to communicate with staff, by failing to ensure the call device was accessible to the resident. The sample size was 19. The deficient practice can result in residents' needs not being met in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included repeated falls, and acute kidney failure, and unsteadiness on feet. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 which indicated the resident had moderate impaired cognition. A review of the care plan initiated on September 28, 2022 revealed the resident was at risk for falling related to deconditioning and gait/balance problems. Interventions included ensuring the resident's call light is within reach, encouraging the resident to use the call light for assistance, and promptly responding to all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to notify two residents (#1 and #45) and residents' representatives in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge. The sample size was 2. The deficient practice could result in residents not knowing their discharge rights. Findings include: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive urgency, and urinary tract infection. Review of a nurse's progress note dated November 5, 2022 included that the resident had a change in level of consciousness, low blood pressure, and a low heart rate. The note included the resident's family member was present in the room. The Nurse Practitioner was notified and an order was received to send the resident to the emergency room for evaluation. The note stated the resident left the facility and was admitted to the hospital. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to notify the residents and/or the residents' representatives of the facility policy for bed hold at the time of discharge/transfer from the facility for two residents (#1 and #45). The sample size was 2. The deficient practice could result in residents not being informed of the bed hold policy. Findings include: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive urgency, and urinary tract infection. Review of a nurse progress note dated November 5, 2022 revealed the resident left the facility and was admitted to the hospital. Review of the resident's census list included a transfer to the hospital on November 5, 2022. Review of a discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an unplanned discharge to the hospital. Review of the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#14) had a referral for a Level II PASRR (pre-admission screening and resident review form). The sample size was 2. The deficient practice could result in resident's not receiving needed care in the facility. Findings include: Resident #14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, depression and sleep terrors. Review of the clinical record revealed a Level I preadmission screening and resident review form (PASRR) dated September 6, 2022 from an acute care hospital. Upon review of the document, the box indicating that the resident qualified for a 30-day convalescent care was selected. No selections regarding mental illness in section B were selected. The remainder of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to develop the person-centered care plan to include the resident's medication/medical needs for one resident (#14). The sample was 19. The deficient practice could result in an incomplete plan of care for the resident. Findings include: Resident #14 was readmitted on [DATE] with an original admission date of September 6, 2022 with diagnoses to include diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), nicotine dependence, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety disorders and sleep terrors. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had shortness of breath while lying flat and upon exertion, used oxygen, was a current smoker and had hypokalemia (low potassium level). Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to fully assess one resident's (#97) nutritional status and needs by not obtaining a baseline weight. The sample size was two residents. The deficient practice could result in unmet nutritional needs and unidentified weight loss. Findings include: Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included biventricular heart failure, hyperlipidemia, anemia, and hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia. Review of the physician's orders revealed: -November 5, 2022 orders for: A regular diet, regular texture, thin liquids consistency, fluid restrictions, fortified foods; and weights per facility protocol. -A November 10, 2022 order for Pro-stat supplement 30 milliliters (ml) one time a day. -A November 15, 2022 order for Ensure clear nutritional supplement two times a day for weight management. Review of a Nutritional Data Collection and assessment dated [DATE] revealed no weight for the resident, that the goal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#14) had an order for oxygen use. The sample size was 2. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving oxygen without a physician order. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, depression and sleep terrors. Review of the admission note dated September 9, 2022 revealed the resident used oxygen at home for chronic COPD as well as during the stay at the acute care hospital prior to admission to the facility. The nursing admission note on this date stated that respiratory equipment (oxygen) was in place. Review of the clinical record revealed several head to toe evaluations dated September 9, 2022, October 2, 2022 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to complete behavior monitoring for one resident (#14). The sample size was 2. The deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving appropriate care and services to attain their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident #14 was readmitted on [DATE] with an original admission date of September 6, 2022 with diagnoses to include diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), nicotine dependence, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety disorders and sleep terrors. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician note dated October 26, 2022 revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired food was not available for consumption. The deficient practice could cause food-borne illness. Findings include: During the initial kitchen walk-thru on November 14, 2022 at 9:47 a.m. with the dietary manager (staff #43) a reach-in refrigerator was observed to contain two pudding-like in disposable mini cups with a lid labeled peanut butter pudding with a use by date of November 7, 2022. A large clear square graduated container with apple sauce was observed labeled use by November 10, 2022. Staff #43 stated that they must have been mislabeled. They were not disposed of at that moment. At 11:02 a.m. that same day, the food items were observed still in the refrigerator. This time staff #43 was observed disposing of them immediately. An interview was conducted on November 17, 2022 at 7:32 a.m. with staff #43. She stated that she conducts inventories every Thursday after food deliveries are made and that she attempts to check every day for expired food. Staff #43 stated there is a risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a policy to ensure two residents (#9 and #1) were administered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. The sample size was 5. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving immunizations. Findings include: -Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident received the influenza vaccine in 2016. Continued review of the clinical record revealed the resident was educated and offered the influenza vaccine, and the consent was signed October 25, 2022. Additional review of the clinical revealed the vaccine was added to the schedule but not administered. Further review of the clinical record revealed the resident had received the pneumococcal (PCV13) vaccine October 15, 2013. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident was educated and offered the pneumococcal vaccine, the consent was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure two residents (#9 and #1) received the COVID vaccine. The sample size was 5. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the COVID vaccine per their request. Findings include: -Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident received a COVID vaccine series on March 11, 2021 and April 5, 2021. Continued review of the clinical record revealed the resident was educated and offered the COVID booster, and the consent was signed October 25, 2022. Additional review of the clinical revealed the vaccine was added to the schedule but not administered. -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident had received the primary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-11-17 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#151) received the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) when there was an ending of Medicare services and the resident remained in the facility. The sample size was 3. The deficient practice could result in residents not being informed of their potential liability of payment. Findings include: Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 6 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating the resident had Review of the NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-coverage) revealed the resident effective date of coverage of the current skilled nursing services would end 7/29/2022. The form included the signature of the resident's representative and the date 7/28/2022. Continued review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SAMUELIAN, ROBERTIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2025
SAMUELIAN, SPENCERIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2025
SAMUELIAN, STEPHENIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2025
SEASTRAND, JASONIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2013
WEST, CHRISTIANIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2025
HAVEN ARIZONA REAL ESTATE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2013
HAVEN COTTONWOOD REAL ESTATE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2013
HAVEN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2013
ROBERTSON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2013
HEALTH GROUP MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/25/2024
ESPINOSA, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2024
FRAGOSO, LINDSAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2021
HAMMER, RONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/28/2024
LONGHURST, STOCKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2020
NIELSEN, CODYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/26/2024
VIJ, NEERAJIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$497K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 22%Other / private 26%

This home reported $497K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$426per resident / day
operating cost
$12,949per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$400per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arizona
$8,365/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,437/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,250/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035093. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next