Haven Of Safford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 7% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 73.9 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.25 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident, family, and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of two residents (#10) and (#20) to be free from abuse by another Resident (#50). This deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include: -Resident #10 (Victim #1) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include hemiplegia, cerebral vascular accident, dementia, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus type 2, and sepsis. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated November December 8, 2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the care-plan for Resident #10 revealed the resident has a behavior problem related to impaired cognitive function, impaired safety awareness, and verbal behaviors with noted interventions of anticipate and meet the resident's needs, allow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-08-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, facility documentation, staffing records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide care and services to meet residents' needs. The deficient practice could result in delayed or unmet care needs for residents requiring staff assistance.Findings include:Review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report revealed that the facility consistently triggered for excessively low weekend staffing during three reporting quarters in 2025. The facility assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the facility was licensed to provide care for 106 residents and had an average daily census of 70 to 80 residents. The average census included 10 to 25 short-stay residents and 30 to 45 long-stay residents. The facility assessment further identified 65 residents who required at least two-person assistance.The facility assessment staffing plan identified the following nursing staffing structure:Full-time Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-08-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and review of applicable policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled resident's (Resident #75 and Resident #52) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (Resident #43 and Resident #6). The deficient practice had the potential to result in additional incidents of abuse and failure to take appropriate measures to protect the residents. Findings included: Regarding resident #75 and Resident #43: -Regarding Resident #75 Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including dementia, chronic heart disease, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, visual hallucinations, generalized muscle weakness, and other related comorbidities. A care plan dated June 26, 2025, revealed that Resident #75 had impaired cognitive function related to dementia, which affected her ability to make her own decisions, with noted interventions to reduce distractions, such as television…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-08-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure the facility policy for abuse was followed for 1 of 5 sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being accurately identified, reported, investigated, and addressed, thereby placing residents at risk for further abuse, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Findings include: - Regarding resident #6: Resident #6 (Perpetrator) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, hypertension, a history of fractures and malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment. The care-plan revealed the resident has a behavior problem related to impaired safety awareness, verbal behavior, and physically aggressive behaviors, with a goal of maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident, family, and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of a resident (#10) to be free from misappropriation from staff. This deficient practice could result in further incidents of staff to resident abuse. Findings Include: -Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include hemiplegia, cerebral vascular accident, dementia, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus type 2, and sepsis. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated November December 8, 2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the care-plan for resident #10 revealed the resident is at risk for functional care deficits and functional mobility limitations with noted interventions of requiring assistance with ambulation, and require supervision and assistance with various activities of daily living.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy when there was an allegation of sexual abuse of one resident (#5). The deficient practice could lead to residents not being protected from abuse.Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include early onset Alzheimer's disease, aphasia, and depression.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment.A care plan, initiated on August 11, 2025 indicated Resident #5 had behavior problems that included poor safety awareness, wandering, and exit seeking. Interventions included intervening as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others.The same care plan was updated on January 5, 2026 to include lifting shirt exposing breasts at times. However, there were no revisions made to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse of one resident (#5). The deficient practice could lead to residents not being protected from abuse.Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include early onset Alzheimer's disease, aphasia, and depression.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment.A care plan, initiated on August 11, 2025 indicated Resident #5 had behavior problems that included poor safety awareness, wandering, and exit seeking. Interventions included intervening as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others.The same care plan was updated on January 5, 2026 to include lifting shirt exposing breasts at times. However, there were no revisions made to the interventions related the Resident #5's behaviors. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for one resident (#5) and take steps to correct it. The deficient practice could lead to residents being subjected to continued abuse. Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include early onset Alzheimer's disease, aphasia, and depression.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment.A care plan, initiated on August 11, 2025 indicated Resident #5 had behavior problems that included poor safety awareness, wandering, and exit seeking. Interventions included intervening as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others.The same care plan was updated on January 5, 2026 to include lifting shirt exposing breasts at times. However, there were no revisions made to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to ensure that safeguards and systems were in place to ensure accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled substances for one of three medication carts sampled. The deficient practice could result in inventory loss and potential diversion. A medication cart observation was conducted on December 9, 2025, at 10:24 a.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff # 46). Photographic images were obtained, with Staff # 46 present, of the Progressive Care Units (PCU) Narcotic Count Reconciliation Sheets. The narcotic sheets were reviewed with Staff # 46 for the months of October 2025 to December 2025. Staff #46 identified multiple entries with either no nurse signatures or only one nurse signature. The review of the Narcotic Count Reconciliation Sheet was conducted for two weeks, October 1-14, 2025 revealed the following:-Two nurses' signatures were not present on 2 shifts between October 1 and 14, 2025.-One nurse's signature was not present on 9 shifts between October 1 and 14,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of records and staff interviews, it was revealed that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines for laundry services, medication preparation, and medication storage. This deficient practice can result in the failure to prevent and control infection transmission amongst a vulnerable population.Findings include:-Regarding the Laundry AreaRe: Laundry RoomAn observation of the facility's laundry room was conducted on December 9, 2025, at 10:15 a.m., with a laundry services employee (Staff #16). During the observation, the following deficiencies were identified on the dirty (soiled) side of the laundry department:1. The linen cart designated for dirty items contained loose articles of clothing that were uncovered.2. Two folded white blankets with visible debris and areas of dark soiling were located underneath both the washer and dryer.3. A blue and white fitted sheet was uncovered inside a gray mobile storage container.4. Two of the three yellow mobile storage containers were uncovered, containing soiled laundry. The third yellow container had its lid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (# 76) to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member (Staff # 30). The deficient practice has the potential to violate the resident's right to safety and prevent further harm. Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (# 76) to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member (Staff # 30). The deficient practice has the potential to violate the resident's right to safety and prevent further harm. Findings include,Resident #76 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the most recent admission date being July 19, 2025, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, unspecified; legal blindness, as defined in USA; chronic pain syndrome, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, other bipolar disorder, restlessness and agitation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,210 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,210 — penalty dated 2026-02-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $499K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ