Haven Health Prescott, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 288 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 56.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure that PASARR Level II is completed.Number of residents sampled: 1Number of residents cited: 1Based on facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#2) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II was completed in a timely manner. The deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving the specialized services needed.Findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, current episode depressed, mild or moderate severity, unspecified.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognitive function. The MDS also revealed that Resident #2 was diagnosed with bipolar disorder.Review of the physician's order revealed the following order:Duloxetine HCl Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles 60 Milligram (Duloxetine HCl). Give 60 milligram by mouth in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left at the bedside for one resident (#92). The deficient practice could result in harm to the residents, and/or visitors who have access to medications.Findings Include:Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, unspecified fracture of left patella, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle spasm, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, depression, atherosclerotic heart disease, and (osteo)arthritis. The Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] is in progress.Resident #92 care plan did not address that resident was able to self-administer medication. Review of the physician's orders revealed no orders to self-administer medications.Review of the assessments revealed not assessed to self-administer medications.Review of progress note revealed no interdisciplinary meeting for self-administer medication.Further review of the Physicians orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, representative and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to assess and monitor one resident's (#77) nutritional needs. The deficient practice could result in residents' nutritional needs not being met.Findings include:Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, diverticulitis of intestine, and dementia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated that the resident had no swallowing impairments, but was noted to have had a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or a loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months, while not on a physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen.Review of Resident #77's care plan revealed a problem focus, initiated on November 6, 2023, which indicated that Resident #77 had a nutritional problem, related to a hip fracture and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, facility documentation, policies and procedures assessment, the facility failed to ensure that food items in the dry storage room and the freezer were properly labeled and dated. The deficient practice could result in food contamination which could cause sickness and potential food poisoning among the residents.Findings Include:On July 22, 2025 at 9:40 a.m during an initial walk-through visit with [NAME] #106 on behalf of the kitchen manager, staff #77 who was on leave that day at the storage room, one half-full bag of macaroni noodles was observed sitting on the shelf with no label or date. Also, two other opened bags- one of chicken tenders and one of French fries-in the freezer that were not labeled or dated. Furthermore, these bags were not stored in sealed containers or zipper bags, as required. The [NAME] stated that opened bags of food items should be dated to the date it was opened and stored in a closed container or a zipper bag. An interview was immediately conducted on July 22, 2025 at 10:00 a.m with the [NAME] #106 confirmed what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#89) was offered or provided showers in accordance with his shower schedule. This deficient practice could result in residents not being provided hygiene care and services.Findings include:Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, pneumonia, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS also revealed that Resident #89 required substantial/maximal assistance with showering and bathing.Review of the shower schedule revealed that Resident #89 was scheduled to receive showers in the morning on Tuesdays and Fridays. Review of the bathing task documentation for May 2025 through June 2025 revealed three dates (May 20, 2025; May 27, 2025; June 10, 2025) in which there was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an incident involving allegation of abuse between a staff member and one resident (#11) was reported according to professional standards. The deficient practice could result in unnoted abuse. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included toxic encephalopathy, pleural effusion, cirrhosis of the liver, and injuries of the head. A late-entry progress note dated April 16, 2025 revealed that on April 15, 2025 at 11:15 p.m., Resident #11 woke up crying and angry, and made allegations that a, chinese man hit her. The progress note revealed that on April 16, 2025, at approximately 1:30 a.m., Resident #11 stated that a Chinese man who worked at the facility hit her; and that, she wanted her husband to call the police and make a report. The progress note further revealed that staff asked the resident about the allegation and she, did not give clear…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical records review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#34) was not physically abused by another resident (#3). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically injured. Findings include: - Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. The care plan initiated and revised on August 9, 2023 revealed a care plan that stated resident #34 had behavior problem related to refusal of medications, hallucinations, and impaired cognitive function. Review of the facility five-day report submitted on September 19, 2023 documented an interview with resident #34 who stated she scratched me as I rolled by referencing resident #3. The report also documented no past encounters with the alleged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary treatment and services were provided for one resident (#1) out of fourteen sampled residents, regarding bowel care. The deficient practice could result in excessive discomfort for the resident. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unspecified dementia, injury of conjunctiva and corneal abrasions of both eyes, and muscle weakness. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated July 11, 2024 for implementing a routine bowel care 3 step program if the resident did not have a bowel movement in 3 days. Review of the progress notes revealed multiple entries from July 15, 2024 to July 26, 2024 from the Nurse Practitioner (NP) that claim the resident had no constipation or abdominal pain, indicating that the NP was unaware of any constipation issues during this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Resident #207 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, depression, insomnia, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder and sedative, hypnotic, or anxiolytic dependence. A physician's order dated 12/12/22 was noted for alparzolam (an antianxiety medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg) as needed (PRN) once a day. The order did not include a stop date. The resident's anxiety care plan, dated 12/12/22, noted the resident received antianxiety medications. An intervention included to administer the medication as ordered. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the resident did receive the medication. A medication regimen review by the pharmacist revealed a recommendation to place an end date on the alpazolam PRN order. There was no evidence that the facility added an end date to the order or that the pharmacy recommendation was acknowledged. There was no evidence that the provider had documented a rationale for having the medication order without an end date. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and labeled appropriately, failed to ensure fans and vents in the kitchen were clean, and failed to ensure refrigerator temperature logs were consistently monitored for one nourishment refrigerator. The deficient practice could result in a potential for food borne illness. Findings include: Regarding food labeling and storage: An observation of the kitchen was conducted on 12/19/22 at 9:41 AM. The following was observed: -Two bins in the dry storage room had food products stored directly in them (they were out of the original boxes they came in). The bins were not labeled with the product name or dated. The products appeared to be flour and bread crumbs. -In the walk-in freezer, there was a box of mini turkey corn dogs that was partially opened. The corn dogs were in a bag that was torn open and the contents were spilling out resulting in two of the corn dogs to be on the shelf with the rest of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTH — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $502K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ