Civita Care Sheriden Woods
321 Stonecrest Drive, Bristol, CT 06010 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 146 certified beds · (860) 583-1827 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,030 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-30)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.4% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.6% | 6.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.3% | 22.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.8% | 16.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.9% | 17.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.2% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.7% | 17.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 53.8% | 69.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.5% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 10.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 2.06 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.46 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.0%CMS range 42.3–60.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.1–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.3–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 120.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policy, and staff interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent an accident for a resident identified as cognitively impaired and at risk for falls. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was supervised during bedside urinal use when left out of staff line of sight behind a privacy curtain, resulting in a fall with injury. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time) with dyskinesia (involuntary, erratic and uncontrollable movements), dysarthria (speech disorder causing slurred, slow or quiet speech due to weakened muscles) and anarthria (severe form of dysarthria resulting in an inability to speak), generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking and anxiety disorder.A Fall Risk Evaluation dated 1/20/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Resident #1's clinical records (including Minimum Data Set assessments, care plan, admission documentation, and nursing notes), facility policies, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who required two-person assistance for transfers as per the care card, was transferred per protocol on 1/16/2026. As a result, Resident #1 sustained an acute comminuted fracture of the left distal femoral shaft above the knee, confirmed by X-ray and hospital records. This constitutes a preventable accident, reflecting a breakdown in supervision and adherence to established protocols. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included osteoarthritis of the knee, rheumatoid arthritis and generalized anxiety disorder.The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of twelve (12) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 had some memory recall deficits, required partial assistance with bed mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #128) reviewed for catheter use, the facility failed to ensure the resident did not develop a pressure area related to the catheter use. The findings include: Residents #128's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, obstructive uropathy, urinary retention, enlarged prostate, hydro-nephrosis with renal, and urethral calculous obstruction. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #128 had moderately impaired cognition, had an indwelling catheter, and had no pressure ulcers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/30/2021 identified Resident #128 was at risk for skin breakdown and had a foley catheter. Interventions directed to inspect skin for redness, catheter care every shift, leg bag when out of bed, and keep foley catheter holder in place. A physician's order dated 9/7/2021 directed foley catheter 20 Fr. (French scale) with 10 milliliters (ml) balloon.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of five residents (Resident #40) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided for a dependent resident to prevent a fall with injury. The findings include: Resident #40's diagnoses included Alzheimer's and a history of repeated falls. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, required extensive assistance of one (1) staff for toilet use and transfers, used a walker, and had three falls since 12/17/2020 (two of the falls were with injury). The Assessment further identified that Resident #40 was not steady and only able to stabilize with human assistance for moving from a seated to standing position, for turning, and for getting on or off the toilet. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/12/2021 identified Resident #40 was at risk for falls.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure Resident Care Conferences (RCCs) were completed at least quarterly. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnoses included fracture of the scaphoid bone of the left wrist (one of the carpal bones on the thumb side of the wrist important for both motion and stability), weakness, Alzheimer's disease and aphasia following a cerebral infarction (language disorder affecting expression, comprehension, reading and writing following a stroke). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/19/25 identified Resident #2 was at risk for falls secondary to being newly admitted to the facility, cognitive impairment and generalized weakness. Interventions included placing the call light within reach and orienting to surroundings, instructing to ask for assistance prior to attempting to transfer or ambulate and instructing the proper use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure a Fall Risk Evaluation was completed at least quarterly. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnoses included fracture of the scaphoid bone of the left wrist (one of the carpal bones on the thumb side of the wrist important for both motion and stability), weakness, Alzheimer's disease and aphasia following a cerebral infarction (language disorder affecting expression, comprehension, reading and writing following a stroke). Cross-reference F657 A Fall Risk Evaluation dated 10/30/25 identified Resident #2 was not at risk to a low fall risk. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/19/25 identified Resident #2 was at risk for falls secondary to being newly admitted to the facility, cognitive impairment and generalized weakness. Interventions included placing the call light within reach and orienting to surroundings,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure a nursing assessment was completed and documented in the clinical record at the time of the fall when the assessment was completed.1. Resident #1's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time) with dyskinesia (involuntary, erratic and uncontrollable movements), dysarthria (speech disorder causing slurred, slow or quiet speech due to weakened muscles) and anarthria (severe form of dysarthria resulting in an inability to speak), generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking and anxiety disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11) and required moderate assistance with personal hygiene and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures, and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Residents #2 and #37) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that a resident at risk for the development of a pressure injury and had an existing pressure injury had patient-centered preventative interventions and treatments that were implemented based on the resident's diagnoses and positioning risk factors contributing to the development and worsening of a pressure injury. The findings include: Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility in September 2025. Diagnoses included Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Sjogren syndrome, chronic combined systolic (congestive and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. A review of physician's orders for the period of 9/26/25 through 10/7/25 identified an order that directed to apply triad paste to the buttocks for wound/skin care. The care plan dated 10/2/25 identified Resident #2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a control drug reconciliation process was in place. The findings includeReview of the 2024, 2025, control drug and receipt program identified 9 yellow control drug and receipt disposition records in the 2025 binder that were not matched up with the white control drug and receipt disposition record (CDR.) Oxycodone IR tab 5mg CDR#1399084 Received 11/27/25Oxycodone IR tab 5mg CDR#1399086 Received 11/27/25Pregabalin Cap 200mg CDR#1493284 Received 1/21/26Oxycodone IR tab 5mg CDR#1505372 Received 10/25/25Morphine ER tab 30mg CDR#1399082 Received 11/27/25Morphine ER tab 30mg CDR#1399083 Received 11/27/25Oxycodone tab 10mg CDR#1399088 Received 11/27/25Lorazepam Conc. 2mg/ml 30ml CDR#1462405 8/23/25Morphine Conc. 20mg/ml 30ml CDR#1462406 8/23/25Review of the 2024 reconciled control drug receipt dispositions identified:Morphine Sol 100mg/5ml received 11/12/24 with a remainder of 14.5ml with no evidence of where the remainder of the medication was located.Lorazepam tab…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 1 of 5 sampled resident (Resident #114) reviewed for unnecessary medication, the facility failed to follow up on the consultant pharmacist's recommendations. The findings include: Resident #114's diagnoses included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia, anxiety disorder, and mood disorder.The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #114 was severely cognitively impaired, had no behavior, independent for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene. required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. The assessment further identified that the resident ambulated short distances. The care plan dated 4/25/24 identified Resident #114 utilized psychotropic medication related to anxiety with interventions that included administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a substantial evening snack daily. The findings include:Observation of the dietary department's dry storage room on 2/19/26 at 11:15 AM identified one box of crackers and seven 1-liter bottles of cola on a shelf identified as the snack shelf. Observation on 2/27/26 at 12:30 PM identified there were no more snacks available to residents. Observation of the snack cart identified there was a coffee carafe present, a basket with one package of crackers, but nothing else on the cart. Interview with FSD on 3/02/2026 at 2:07 PM identified that snacks were received on Thursdays and ran out by Mondays with the new budget. Observation of the snack cart on 3/02/2026 at 1:45 PM identified a coffee carafe, a ginger ale bottle and a half pack of crackers on the bottom of the cart. Interview with FSD at this time identified the kitchen aides refill the cart from the storage room but on observation of the storage room there are 6 bottles of cola and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored or prepared in accordance with professional standards to ensure food service safety. The findings include:Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 2/19/2026 at 10:15 AM identified the following: Two turkeys thawing on the second shelf with visible drainage from the thawing turkeys on the shelf above cartons of liquid eggs and cartons of milk. [NAME] Slaw dressing marked as received on 10/21/24 and marked as opened 11/2 without a year. Unable to locate an expiration date on the top, container, or bottom.Barbeque (Boom Boom) Sauce marked as received into the facility 10/21/24 and marked as opened 11/6 without a year listed. Unable to locate an expiration date or directions for use after opening.Ranch salad dressing received into the facility 9/22/25 and opened 11/6 without a year. Unable to locate an expiration date.An opened jar of maraschino cherries jar with visible crusting around the cap.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for three sampled residents (Residents #37, Resident #77 and Resident #117) reviewed for infection surveillance, failed to appropriately track and place a resident with an open wound on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), the facility failed to appropriately cohort residents with a known Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) colonization per facility policy, the facility failed to review the infection prevention control program policies and procedures at least annually, the facility failed to ensure environmental rounds were conducted by the department heads on a quarterly basis, the facility failed to ensure that the infection control surveillance data collected monthly was analyzed for trends, and failed to follow the policy and procedural measures developed by the facility to prevent the growth of Legionella and other water borne pathogens in the building water system and for one sampled (Resident #49) on droplet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility policy, facility documentation, and interview for three of five sampled residents (Resident #5, Resident #8 and Resident #50) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the COVID-19 booster vaccine was administered as requested by the resident/responsible party and offered on admission. The findings include:F887 Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility policy, facility documentation, and interview for three of five sampled residents (Resident #5, Resident #8 and Resident #50) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the COVID-19 booster vaccine was administered as requested by the resident/responsible party and offered on admission. The findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in January of 2026 and had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedure, and interviews for two of six sampled residents (Resident #9 and Resident #79) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place and consents were obtained regarding the resident's wishes regarding advance directives and decisions related to cardiopulmonary code status. The findings include: Resident #9's diagnoses included systemic lupus erythematosus, depression and hypothyroidism. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 was cognitively intact and was independent with dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. The care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 had an established advance directive with a wish to be a DNR (do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation)/ DNI (do not intubate)/RNP (Registered Nurse may Pronounce death) with interventions that directed to not administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #114) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #114's diagnoses included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies dementia, major depressive disorder, and mood disorder.The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #114 was moderately cognitively impaired, had no behaviors, required limited assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene. The assessment further identified the resident utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The care plan dated 10/3/25 identified Resident #114 was at risk for refusing care and not waiting for assistance with transfers related to behavior problems with interventions that included assistance of two staff for care and transfers, introduce self to resident, explain what you are going to do, use calm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #114) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the allegation of abuse was reported to the state survey agency in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #114's diagnoses included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies dementia, major depressive disorder, and mood disorder.The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #114 was moderately cognitively impaired, had no behaviors, required limited assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene. The assessment further identified the resident utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The care plan dated 10/3/25 identified Resident #114 was at risk for refusing care and not waiting for assistance with transfers related to behavior problems with interventions that included assistance of two staff for care and transfers, introduce self to resident, explain what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #45) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were passed on time. The findings include: Resident #45's diagnoses included hypertension, type 2 diabetes, cirrhosis of liver, seizures. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressings and personal hygiene. The assessment further identified the use of a walker for mobility. The care plan dated 1/21/26 identified Resident #45 was at risk for seizures with interventions that included caution patient to lie down and push call button if experiencing a prodromal or aural warning, keep call light within reach, medications as ordered. Review of the active physician's orders for March 2026 directed to administer Keppra Oral tablet 500mg 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #2) who was incontinent, dependent on staff for care, and had a pressure injury, the facility failed to ensure the timely provision of care allowing the resident to go without incontinent care for over five hours. The findings include:Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility in September 2025. Diagnoses included Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Sjogren syndrome, chronic combined systolic (congestive and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. The Norton Plus Assessment (determines the risk of developing pressure ulcers), dated 10/6/25 identified Resident #2 scored 11 which indicated Resident #2 was at high risk. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition, utilized a wheelchair, was dependent for transfers, showering and toileting hygiene, was always incontinent of bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #79) reviewed for foot care, the facility failed to ensure the resident received podiatry services for trimming of toenails. The findings include:Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in November of 2025 and had diagnosed that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, and paraplegia. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #79 was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for dressing, personal hygiene, putting on/taking off footwear, transfers and was non-ambulatory. The care plan dated 11/21/25 identified Resident #79 had diabetes with interventions that directed podiatry consult as ordered and skin audits per facility protocol. The care plan further identified the resident requires assistance with dressing, bathing hygiene, transfers, total care except feeding, oral care and dressing with interventions directed assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #102) reviewed for pain, the facility failed to ensure the resident received pain medication timely. The findings include: Resident #102's diagnoses included primary osteoarthritis left shoulder, pain disorder with related psychological factors, chronic pain syndrome, unilateral primary osteoarthritis right knee. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #102 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, required limited assistance with bed mobility, independent to supervision or touching assistance with transfers, partial to moderate assistance with dressing and independent with personal hygiene. The assessment further identified that the resident utilized a walker and a wheelchair for mobility.The care plan dated 2/26/26 identified Resident #102 was at risk for pain related to being on pain medication therapy with interventions that included administer analgesic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedure, and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #5) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was offered and/assessed for pneumococcal and influenza immunization upon admission as per facility's policy. The findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in January of 2026 and had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 was cognitively intact and had not received the influenza vaccine as it was not offered. Review of Resident #5 immunization and clinical records with the Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse (RN #6) on 2/24/26 at 12:31 PM failed to identify that the influenza and the pneumococcal vaccine was offered and/or assessed for past immunization. Interview with RN #6 on 2/24/26 at 12:31 PM identified that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with transfers and ambulating, the facility failed to review and revise the mobility care plan when there was a change with the physician's order. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included osteoarthritis (the most common type of arthritis that occurs when the cartilage that lines the joints is worn down or damaged and the bones rub together when the joint is used) of the knee, rheumatoid arthritis (when the immune system attacks the tissue lining the joints causing joint inflammation and pain), and generalized anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 3/2/25 and remained a currant order directed to provide the resident with bed mobility assistance of two (2) and transfer assistance of two (2) with a rolling walker. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had sustained an injury, the facility failed to administer pain medication following observations of pain to keep the resident comfortable. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included osteoarthritis (the most common type of arthritis that occurs when the cartilage that lines the joints is worn down or damaged and the bones rub together when the joint is used) of the knee, rheumatoid arthritis (when the immune system attacks the tissue lining the joints causing joint inflammation and pain), and generalized anxiety disorder. A monthly physician's order that was initially ordered on 1/26/24 directed to administer acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg), give three (3) tablets by mouth every six (6) hours as needed for pain. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for palliative care, the facility failed to administer medications as prescribed by the physician. The findings include: Resident #32's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, and adult failure to thrive. A significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #32 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and was dependent on staff with all activities. The care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #32 was admitted to hospice on [DATE]. Interventions directed to administer pain medications according to the physician order. The hospice narrative note dated [DATE] identified Resident #32 had a significant decline, was not eating and had difficulty swallowing. On assessment, the resident was minimally responsive, breathing was labored, and moaned in pain when moved. Recommendations included discontinue all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for palliative care, the facility failed to ensure that clinical record documentation was accurate by documenting medications that were not actually given. The findings include: Resident #32's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, chronic kidney disease and adult failure to thrive. A significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #32 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and was dependent on staff with all activities. The care plan dated 2/16/25 identified Resident #32 was admitted to hospice on 1/28/25. Interventions directed to administer pain medications according to the physician order. Further review of the care plan identified the resident had episodes of anxiety and history of anxiety. Interventions included anti-anxiety per order and monitor for effectiveness. The hospice narrative note dated 2/25/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan to include known smoking incidents. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and nicotine dependence. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen (15/15), indicative of being cognitively intact and was independent for mobility with a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/12/24 identified Resident #1 had a smoking history. Interventions directed to instruct about the facility smoking policy, smoking materials locked in the medication room, offer nicotine patch and address smoking cessation. Clinical record review of the nursing progress notes identified the following: a. Nursing note dated 7/18/2024 at 10:28 PM identified Resident #1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure known resident smoking incidents were investigated timely. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and nicotine dependence. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen (15/15), indicative of being cognitively intact and was independent for mobility with a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/12/24 identified Resident #1 had a smoking history. Interventions directed to instruct about the facility smoking policy, smoking materials locked in the medication room, offer nicotine patch and address smoking cessation. Clinical record review of the nursing progress notes identified the following: a. Nursing note dated 7/18/2024 at 10:28 PM identified Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and policies, and interviews for two (2) sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) who were reviewed for the misappropriation of personal property, the facility failed to ensure the residents' controlled medications and the controlled disposition sheets were not removed from the facility. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and malignant neoplasm of the colon. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, received scheduled pain medication, experienced shortness of breath, and was on hospice services. The Resident Care Plan dated 6/11/24 identified Resident #1 had the potential for pain. Interventions directed to administer pain medications as ordered and assess the characteristics of the pain, location, and severity. A physician's order dated 7/12/24 directed to administer Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to treat the resident in a dignified and respectful manner. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included knee replacement, difficulty walking, and pain. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time and required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene, transferring in and out of the bed and chair and dressing, was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of stool. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/21/24 identified Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions directed to provide incontinent care every two (2) hours, provide privacy and dignity while providing care, and offer bedpan and toileting assist every two (2) hours. The nurse's note dated 11/12/24 at 12:44…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #2), reviewed for misappropriation of funds, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation from a facility staff member. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease and deep vein thrombosis (blood clot) of the left lower extremity. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had severely impaired cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). The care plan dated 6/12/24 identified Resident #2 had episodes of anxiety with interventions included to observe for behaviors as indicated, offer support and reassurance to the resident and family, and provide a calm quite environment. Review of the accident and incident form (A & I) dated 8/30/24 identified Resident #2 told his/her niece…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for impaired skin integrity, the facility failed to document completed weekly skin evaluation forms in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia and coronary artery disease. Physician's treatment order dated June 2024 directed weekly skin checks on bath/shower day Thursday every evening shift (3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift). The Norton_assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was at moderate risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. A weekly skin evaluation form dated 6/6/24 identified Resident #1 had no new skin impairments since the last review. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bladder, and required assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use. The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policies and procedures, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #6) who were reviewed for an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from verbal and physical abuse when a staff member pushed resident into a seated position with force and used profanity directed towards the resident. The findings include: Resident #6's diagnoses included dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and generalized muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required extensive assistance of one (1) staff member for most activities of daily living including locomotion on unit, and a wheelchair was utilized for mobility. The social service progress note dated 3/23/22 at 11:13 AM identified on this date the social worker witnessed a 7AM-3PM charge nurse use inappropriate language towards Resident #6 and aggressively pulled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Residents #1 and #10) who were reviewed for an allegation of misappropriation of the resident's medication, the facility failed to ensure Residents #1's medications were not consumed by a licensed nurse and Resident #10's narcotic medication was not missing and unaccounted for. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, chronic pain syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A physician's order dated 2/21/23 directed Gabapentin also known as Neurontin 300 milligrams (mg) one (1) capsule two (2) times per day for neuropathy, weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage usually in the hands and feet. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 made poor decisions regarding tasks of daily life and required cueing or supervision. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/24/23 identified Resident #1 had pain. Interventions directed to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Residents #1 and #10) who were reviewed for allegations of misappropriation of medications the facility failed to report the allegations timely and did not remove the involved staff member from the facility immediately. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, chronic pain syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A physician's order dated 2/21/23 directed Gabapentin also known as Neurontin 300 milligrams (mg) one (1) capsule two (2) times per day for neuropathy, weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage usually in the hands and feet. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 made poor decisions regarding tasks of daily life and required cueing or supervision. The Facility Reported Incident report dated 5/10/23 at 1:40 PM identified on 5/6/23 at 11:00 PM the Nursing Supervisor consumed 900 mg of Gabapentin from a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #9) who were reviewed for the administration of medication, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse followed standards of practice when administering insulin. The findings include: 1. Resident #9's diagnoses included diabetes with diabetic neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy without macular edema. A physician's order dated 2/7/22 directed to administer a long-acting medication to lower the blood sugar, Levemir FlexTouch solution Pen Injector 100 units/ml, inject 56 units subcutaneously (under the skin) two (2) times a day, hold for blood sugar under 130. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #9 made reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily life and received insulin daily. A physician's order dated 3/4/22 directed to give a short acting medication that lowers the blood sugar, Insulin Lispro Solution Pen-injector 100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for dignified treatment, (Resident 1) , the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the with diagnoses that included post-polio syndrome and dementia. The physician's orders dated 1/11/24 directed an assist of one staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and toileting and assist of two staff for transfers with hoyer lift. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The care plan dated 4/12/24 identified Resident #1 had mobility deficits and was a hoyer list with assist of two (2) staff for transfers with interventions that included to provide assistance with mobility as ordered and allow the resident sufficient time to complete a task. The care plan further identified Resident #1 required assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for transfer status, (Resident #1) , the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in care plan and physician orders. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the with diagnoses that included post-polio syndrome and dementia. Physician's orders dated 1/11/24 directed an assist of one staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) and assist of two staff for transfers with hoyer lift. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, and required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) The care plan dated 4/12/24 identified Resident #1 had mobility deficits and was a hoyer list with assist of two staff for transfer with interventions included to provide assistance with mobility as ordered, and allow the resident sufficient time to complete a task. The care plan further identified Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews for five of twenty-four sampled residents (Residents #33, #51, #69, 78, &107) reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders and the signed advanced directive forms were congruent. The findings include: 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting non-dominant side, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the clinical record identified an Advanced Directive form dated [DATE] that identified Resident #33 elected a code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), which means if the resident stops breathing or if the resident's heart stops beating cardiopulmonary resuscitation will not be provided. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the Resident #33 had intact cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance with activities of daily living. The Care Plan dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #11) observed during the medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist identified a discrepancy in a written physician's order. The findings include: Resident #11's diagnoses included dementia, psychotic disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and pain. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 had moderately impaired cognition and was independent with ambulation and transfers but required assistance with bathing, dressing, and toileting. The physician's order dated 4/18/2024 (origination date of order was 1/19/24) directed: administer Gabapentin capsule 300 mg give 100mg by mouth two times a day for pain. The care plan dated 4/22/2024 identified resident had pain/potential for pain related to generalized discomfort and recent falls with interventions that included to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for sample one of two sampled residents (Resident #24) who required total assistance with activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's nails were trimmed. The findings include: Resident #24's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, contracture of right hand, and macular degeneration. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #24's cognition was severely impaired, required total assistance for toileting, transfers, personal hygiene, transfers, and was non-ambulatory. The care plan dated 3/11/24 identified Resident #24 had an ADL deficit due to dementia diagnosis with interventions that included explain tasks to resident, breakdown tasks into simple subtasks as able if necessary. The care plan further identified Resident #24 required assistance with grooming with interventions with an intervention for weekly skin inspections. The physician's orders for April/2024 included an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #113) with a non-pressure related wound, the facility failed to ensure the wound was assessed by a registered nurse upon initial observation, and failed to ensure the wound was assessed on a weekly basis. The findings include: Resident #113 's diagnoses included heart failure, lymphedema, chronic embolism, venous insufficiency, and chronic pain. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #113 had intact cognition and required limited assistance with toileting, hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/14/24 identified Resident #113 was at risk for skin breakdown related to impaired mobility and lower extremity edema. Care plan interventions directed to inspect skin for redness, irritation and breakdown during care, weekly skin inspections, treatment as ordered, and pressure reducing mattress/cushion as needed. The physician's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #27) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that the initial and weekly assessments of the wound were completed by a registered nurse. The findings include: Resident #27's diagnoses included type 1 diabetes mellitus, adult failure to thrive, weakness, anemia, and hyperlipidemia. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #27 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. The assessment further identified Resident #27 was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers and was admitted with an unstageable pressure injury. The care plan dated 2/22/24 identified Resident #27 was at risk for skin breakdown related to mobility, nutrition, and incontinence with interventions that included weekly skin inspections, off-load heels, and pressure reducing cushion or mattress as needed. The Wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for a resident-to-resident interaction, the facility failed to ensure the resident's dignity was maintained. The findings include: Resident #58's diagnoses included schizophrenia, hypotension, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 had severely impaired cognition, and required supervision with toileting hygiene, transfers, and ambulation. The care plan dated 2/19/24 identified Resident #58 had impaired cognition related to long term and short memory loss with interventions that included: encourage socialization and recreational activities, identify self, speak slowly and clearly, and explain all procedures. The care plan further identified Resident #58 had a history of trauma with potential of traumatization with interventions that included social services to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation review, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed ensure timely notification of an allegation of inappropriate behavior to the State Survey Agency. The findings include: Resident #58's diagnoses included schizophrenia, hypotension, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 had severely impaired cognition, required moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and transfers. The assessment further identified the resident was ambulatory. The care plan dated 2/19/24 identified Resident #58 had impaired cognition related to long term and short memory loss with interventions that included: encourage socialization and recreational activities, identify self, speak slowly and clearly, and explain all procedures. The care plan further identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for an allegation of resident-to-resident mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure a timely investigation was initiated. The findings include: Resident #58's diagnoses included schizophrenia, hypotension, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 had severely impaired cognition, required moderate assistance with toileting, hygiene, and transfers. The assessment further identified the resident was ambulatory. The care plan dated 2/19/24 identified Resident #58 had impaired cognition related to long term and short memory loss with interventions that included: encourage socialization and recreational activities, identify self, speak slowly and clearly, and explain all procedures. The care plan further identified Resident #58 had a history of trauma with potential of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely of an allegation of abuse. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, and anxiety. A nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 7:13 PM identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented, and required staff supervision for toileting, transfers, and ambulating with a walker. The A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/23/2024 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls due to decreased endurance. Interventions directed to instruct Resident #1 to ask for assistance prior to attempting to transfer or ambulate, and to assist with transfers. A facility grievance form dated 1/24/2024 identified the Administrator received a phone call from Resident #1 and indicated no staff assisted for toileting on the second and third…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include an assessment after reported pain. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included status post fracture of the left femur, closed reduction. A nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 7:13 PM identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented, and had a left thigh surgical incision with bruising notes. A MDS assessment screening tool dated 1/23/2024 identified Resident #1 was independent for range of motion for upper extremities and dependent for range of motion for lower extremities. The A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/23/2024 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls due to decreased endurance. Interventions directed Physical Therapy as ordered. A facility grievance form dated 1/24/2024 identified the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility documentation review and interviews for kitchen review, the facility failed to ensure bread was labeled with an expiration date. The findings include: Interview and tour of kitchen on 11/15/2021 at 10:20 AM with the Director of Dining Services (DoD) identified although four (4) loaves of bread were marked with an expiration date of 11/10/2021, over twelve (12) loaves of bread had no manufacturer's label with expiration dates. Further, the loaves of bread were not marked to identified when it was received or an expiration date. The DoD indicated that the loaves of bread should be marked to indicate an expiration date. Interview with Director of Kitchen on 11/10/2021 at 11:47 AM identified the facility receives bread is delivered frozen and kept frozen until time for use. Then it is thawed overnight for use the next day and is usually deemed good for 72 hours after being thawed. Per the Director of Kitchen, the bread should be labeled with a green sticker to identify the date of thawing, and it was an oversight that the observed loaves of breads had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #191 and #588) who were reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to notify a physician at the time the residents experienced a decline in their health status. The findings include: 1. Resident #191's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #191 made reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily life and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. The nurse's note dated 3/22/20 at 5:15 PM identified the charge nurse notified the Nursing Supervisor that Person #2 stated Resident #191 had slurred speech while talking. The charge nurse stated Resident #191 had weakness earlier in the day and upon assessment Resident #191 was sitting up in bed unassisted, watching TV, and eating a fish sandwich using both hands. Resident #191's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #190) who was discharged home, the facility failed ensure the Inter-Agency Patient Referral Form had the correct demographic information and an order for oxygen therapy. The findings include: Resident #190's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COVID-19, anxiety and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #190 had short and long-term memory problems, had modified independence with cognitive skills for daily decision making, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and received oxygen therapy while not a resident. A physician's order dated 1/6/21 directed oxygen via nasal cannula at three (3) liters per minute as needed to maintain an oxygen saturation level greater than or equal to 92%, may titrate if needed and check the pulse oximetry every shift. The physician's progress noted dated 1/28/21 identified Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews, for one sample resident (Resident #22) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed a comprehensive care plan to include resident refusals to attend dialysis appointments. The findings include: Resident # 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]with diagnosis that included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) that required hempdialysis A physician's order dated 6/2/2021 directed hemodialysis three times a week. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #22 received dialysis treatments. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified that Resident #22 was alert and oriented, refused care during the last 1-3 times during the last 7 days, received hempdialysis and refused care at times. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified that Resident #22 was alert and oriented, refused care one to three times during the last seven days, and received hemodialysis, and refuses care at times. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #588) who was a new admission, the facility failed to transcribe onto the Medication Administration Record the correct frequency a medication was to be administered . The findings include: Resident #588's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus. The Inter-Agency Patient Referral Form dated 10/5/21 directed aspart protamine-insulin aspart (70-30) units/milliliter injection, inject 15 ml (15 units total) under the skin 2 (two) times a day before meals. A physician's order dated 10/5/21 directed insulin aspart prot and aspart suspension (70-30) 100 unit/ml, inject 15 units subcutaneously before meals for diabetes. Review of the October 2021 Medication Administration Record (MAR) identified the transcribed order read insulin aspart and aspart suspension 15 units administer three (3) times a day before meals at 7:30 AM, 11:30 AM and 4:30 PM. Upon further review, the MAR identified the insulin was administered three (3) times on 10/6/21 instead of only twice.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #588) who was a new admission, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order when the resident required oxygen therapy. The findings include: Resident #588's diagnoses included COVID-19, chronic congestive heart disease, and pleural effusion. The nurse's note dated [DATE] at 2:09 PM identified Resident #588's family was notified Resident #588's oxygen saturation level dropped to 84% on room air (normal level 95-100%) and oxygen at two (2) liters per minute was initiated. Upon further review, the clinical record failed to reflected documentation a Registered Nurse assessed Resident #588 when his/her oxygen level dropped to 84% and oxygen was required and that an order was obtained for the oxygen. The nurse's note dated [DATE] at 8:02 AM identified at 4:45 AM an nurse aide reported Resident #588 did not look good, Resident #588 was immediately assessed by the Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-30 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) nurse aides, the facility failed to complete an annual performance evaluation. The findings include:Review of a 3-11PM nurse aide's, Nurse Aide (NA) #1, personnel file identified a hire date of 11/26/12 and the last performance evaluation was completed on 12/18/22. The facility failed to identify a yearly performance evaluation was completed in 2023, 2024, and 2025. Interview with the Administrator on 1/20/2026 at 2:45 PM identified each employee was required to have a performance evaluation completed annually based on their date of hire, yearly anniversary. The Administrator identified although the facility does not currently have a Human Resources (HR) staff member, HR was expected to make the notification of when the performance evaluation was due, and the annual evaluation was then distributed to the nursing supervisor to complete, HR was then responsible for ensuring the annual performance evaluations were completed and in the employee's record. The How to Complete the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-04-26 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident # 120) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure a written summary of the baseline care plan was discussed and provided to the resident and/or representative. The findings include: Resident #120 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Covid-19, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and polyarthritis. Resident #120's baseline care plan was completed on 1/13/24. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #120 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance for toileting, hygiene, bed mobility, transfer, and ambulation. Interview with RN #1 (7-3 shift nursing supervisor) on 4/24/24 at 11:15 AM identified that the nursing supervisors develop the resident baseline care plans on admission and the interdisciplinary team meets and discusses the plan of care with the resident and/or resident representative within 72 hours of the resident's admission.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy, and interviews for three of five sampled residents (Residents #9, #64, and #74) reviewed for unnecessary medication, the facility failed to ensure laboratory and/diagnostic medical records were readily accessible and complete in the resident's physical chart and/or electronic medical record system. The findings include: 1. Resident #9's diagnoses included anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and delusional disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 was moderately cognitively impaired and required partial moderate assistance with toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, required set-up or clean up assistance with eating and oral hygiene and required the use of a walker and wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/15/24 identified Resident #9 was at risk for falls with interventions that included monitor for possible side effects from psychotropic medication, MD to consider dosage reduction when clinically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-04-26 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #23) reviewed for hospice care, the facility failed to ensure that the clinical record contained hospice documentation, The findings include: Resident #23 's diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, dementia, and abnormal weight loss. A physician's order dated 11/19/23 directed to admit Resident #23 to hospice. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for all activities of daily living and received hospice care. The care plan dated 3/12/24 identified Resident #23 was at end of life, had an overall decline in status, and death was anticipated. Interventions included assist with meals, encourage food/fluid as tolerated, and provide frequent mouth care to keep mucous membranes moist. Review of the clinical record on 4/22/24 at 12:34 PM failed to identify the following hospice documentation:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,030 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-01-30
- $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-01-30
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-03 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLACI, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 9% | since 10/30/1985 |
| SANTILLI, LAWRENCE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 21% | since 01/01/2016 |
| MOSIER, MICHAEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/30/1985 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075350. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.