No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Plymouth Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

123 South Street, Plymouth, MA 02360 · For profit - Corporation · 186 certified beds · (508) 746-4343 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 746-4343 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$141,373 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $141,373 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-29)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
59 Long Pond Rd · (781) 626-5180 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
121 Camelot Dr Ste 3 · (508) 732-9700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
164 South St · (508) 746-1886 · Call to confirm hours
Park
29 Mt Pleasant St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8 Pleasant St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.1%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms23.4%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.4%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.9%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.3%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table34.6%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.301.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.511.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
10.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 10.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.5%CMS range 27.6–52.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.8–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge10.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge11.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge21.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.9–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
30.5%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 186 beds and averages 141.2 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-02)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Plan of Care indicated he/she required physical assistance of two staff members with toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, bathing and turning side to side in bed, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff consistently implemented and followed interventions from his/her Plan of Care while meeting his/her care needs. On 09/26/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided personal care to Resident #1 in bed without another staff member present to assist her, when she turned Resident #1 on his/her side in bed, Resident #1 fell out of bed and landed on the floor on his/her left side. On 10/01/23, Resident #1 was noted with bruising to his/her left shoulder, and his/her left ankle was noted to be bruised and swollen. An x-ray was ordered and revealed a nondisplaced left distal tibial (along the length of the bone, below the knee and above the ankle) fracture. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing at risk for falls, whose Plan of Care indicated he/she required physical assistance of two staff members with toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, bathing and turning side to side in bed, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the required level of staff assistance during care to maintain his/her safety, in an effort to prevent incidents/accidents resulting in an injury. On 09/26/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided personal care to Resident #1 in bed without another staff member present to assist her, when she turned Resident #1 on his/her side in bed, Resident #1 fell out of bed and landed on the floor on his/her left side. On 10/01/23, Resident #1 was noted with bruising to his/her left shoulder, and his/her left ankle was noted to be bruised and swollen. An x-ray was ordered and revealed a nondisplaced left distal tibial (along the length of the bone, below the knee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for three Residents (#18, #78, and #97), of 27 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure quality care was provided. Specifically, 1. For Resident #18, the facility failed to monitor, document, and assess the impaired skin on his/her left lateral ankle, resulting in cellulitis (a serious bacterial infection of the skin); 2. For Resident #78, facility staff moved the Resident with a broken hip off the floor and into a wheelchair prior to the arrival of emergency services; and 3. For Resident #97, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for wound treatments. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Skin Care Non-Pressure Wound Assessment, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility strives to provide the resident with high quality, consistent, timely wound assessments. If a resident presents with a venous, arterial or diabetic ulcer, the wound will be assessed on a weekly basis. Non-pressure alterations in skin integrity also include skin tears and post op surgical incisions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 29 residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, for Resident #10, the facility failed to implement treatments from the wound consultant physician for a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss of skin) on the left ischium/buttock.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Prevention and Management of Pressure Injuries, revised 1/2025, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Wound treatments are done per MD order.Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses including Stage 4 pressure ulcer of the left buttock.Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/26, indicated the Resident was cognitively intact, as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident had one Stage 4 pressure ulcer present on admission to the facility and received pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident #50's Prednisolone Acetate 1% and Timolol Maleate 0.5% ophthalmic drops were stored securely; 2. Ensure medication and topical treatments were securely stored and not left at the bedside on 1 out of 5 units in the facility; and3. Ensure that medications in the refrigerator were stored under the proper temperature for 1 out of 3 medication rooms.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated 2/2018, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel.-Storage for other medications will be limited to a locked medication room.-Drugs requiring refrigeration are stored separately in a refrigerator, that is used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#33), out of a total sample of 29 residents, was treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #33, to ensure a Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag was consistently covered with a privacy bag. Findings include:Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 and had diagnoses including urinary retention (inability to completely empty the bladder leading to frequent urination or leakage of urine).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/25, indicated Resident #33 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 and had an indwelling urinary catheter.Review of Physician's Orders indicated but was not limited to:-Foley catheter size #16 French with 10 milliliter (ml) balloon (6/27/25)-Catheter to bedside drainage bag while in bed every shift (6/27/25)-Flush Foley catheter with 30 ml normal saline as needed and every shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for the investigation of allegations of abuse, protection of residents during investigations and reporting of allegations and investigative findings for one Resident (#18), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate their abuse policy after an allegation of potential abuse was reported by the surveyor during the survey.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2/2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.- Alleged Violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report a potential allegation of abuse for one Resident (#18), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2/2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.-Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes:a. immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, orb. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury.-The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff thoroughly investigated an allegation of abuse for one Resident (#18), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2/2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.- Alleged Violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property.-An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for four Residents (#12, #1, #145, and #5), out of 29 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #12, to administer an antihypertensive medication as ordered on days the Resident left the facility to go to dialysis;2. For Resident #1, to monitor that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were not working out of their scope of practice by adjusting liter flow on oxygen tanks;3. For Resident #145, to administer Ativan according to physician's orders; and4. For Resident #5, to ensure a physician's order was in place for self-administration of Muscle Rub (topical analgesic treatment).Findings include:Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11ed, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when one of one nurses observed during a medication pass made two errors out of 32 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.25%. Those errors impacted two Residents (#50 and #56), out of three residents observed.Findings include:Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers. 1. Review of Resident #50's Physician's Orders indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension 1% - Instill 1 drop in both eyes two times a day (order date 10/4/24)On 1/28/26 at 10:24 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #9 prepare and administer Resident #50's morning medications. Nurse #9 returned to the medication cart, put the Resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential for foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Properly label and date food and beverage products as well as maintain safe and clean equipment in three of four nourishment kitchenettes; and2. Handle ready-to-eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Personal Food Policy, dated 11/2016, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Families and visitors of residents are permitted to bring food into the facility for resident use. - The staff person receiving the personal food shall label the container with the date it was brought into the facility and the name of the resident receiving it. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two Residents (#13, #33), out of a total of five residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #13, to ensure his/her indwelling Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag outside of the body) drainage bag was maintained in a sanitary manner through implementation of infection control practices for resident care; and2. For Resident #33, to ensure his/her indwelling Foley catheter drainage bag was maintained in a sanitary manner. Findings Include:Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, dated 2009, updated 6/6/19, page 13, section III, Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance, indicated but was not limited to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for six Residents (#82, #93, #96, #59, #104, #54) on the [NAME] Unit. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the Residents with assistive devices (wheelchairs and walkers) that were maintained in a clean and comfortable manner and promptly addressed any repair needs as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Rehabilitation Services Policy and Procedure Manual, dated 1/17, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Adaptive devices will be checked with each use. Needed replacement parts will be kept in inventory to ensure timely replacement. Tightening of nuts/bolts will be done when needed as will wiping off of tips to prevent slipping. -All equipment malfunctions are to be reported immediately to the Rehab Program Manager. The equipment will be tagged Do Not Use and stored in a non-patient treatment area until repaired. On 12/19/24 at 9:05 A.M., the surveyor observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided, according to the plan of care, facility protocols, and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#79), out of 28 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments for Resident #79 were reflective of recommendations from the wound consultant physician and in line with the primary physician's treatment plan. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Treatments, dated April 2015, indicated but was not limited to the following: -in order for residents to achieve an optimum in their physical state, various treatments may be necessary -these treatments may be ordered by the physician or, within the scope of nursing -it is the responsibility of all nursing staff to constantly evaluate the health state of residents as to the need for treatments -once treatments are ordered, they are to be carried out as prescribed -an order is written for each treatment indicating type, frequency and location -treatments are reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for one Resident (#91), in a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the correct liter flow per physician's orders, failed to ensure oxygen equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner to help decrease the risk of potential contamination and infection, and failed to ensure the Resident was referred to a pulmonologist. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, undated, indicated a physician's order is necessary for the administration of oxygen. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Concentrators, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Verify the physicians order and review the patients' chart. -Adjust the liter flow in accordance with the physician's order by rotating the flow selector knob on the flow meter located on the front panel of the unit. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three Residents' (#1, #123, and #87) drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of the antipsychotic medications risperidone and chlorpromazine were attempted, unless clinically contraindicated and documented in the medical record, in an effort to discontinue the drug; 2. For Resident #123, to ensure a GDR of the antipsychotic medication olanzapine was attempted, unless clinically contraindicated and documented in the medical record, in an effort to discontinue the drug; and 3. For Resident #87, to ensure a GDR of psychotropic medication was attempted, unless clinically contraindicated and documented in the medical record, in an effort to discontinue the drug. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Management, dated 4/15, included but was not limited to the following: -Each resident's drug regimen will be free from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for four Residents (#58, #92, #79, and #90), out of 28 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Residents #58, #92, #79, and #90 to ensure that documentation of wound physician visits was part of the medical record in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Thinning of the Clinical Record, dated September 2015, indicated the following records were to be maintained in the active clinical record: Consultations: Most current year with exception of a one-time only consult. 1. Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in February 2019 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #58's current Physician's Orders indicated but was not limited to: -Monitor dressing site: left foot dressing every shift, dated 12/19/24 -Monitor dressing site: right foot dressing every shift, dated 11/21/24 -Treatment order: Wash with wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a consistent medical order honoring Advanced Directives for two Residents (#1 and #123), in a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to ensure the physician's order and medical record for Advance Directives matched the court ordered directives; and 2. For Resident #123, to ensure the physician's order and medical record reflected the resident's executed Advance Directives. Findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in [DATE]. Resident #1 has a legal guardian who is responsible for making healthcare decisions. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #1 was admitted to hospice services on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders indicated: Code Status: Full Code revised [DATE]. Review of the Resident's record indicated a decree to authorize the guardian to consent to the following Advanced Directives: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Do Not Intubate (DNI), dated [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Resident's physician about changes in condition so as to re-evaluate the potential need to alter the treatment plan for one Resident (#90), from a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the primary physician of a new pressure ulcer in order to alter the treatment plan to prevent deterioration. Findings include: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility in February 2021. Review of the medical record indicated the Resident switched primary care physicians in October 2024. Review of the care plans for Resident #90 indicated the Resident was at risk for alterations in skin integrity related to weakness, poor safety awareness, and diabetes. Review of the current Physician's Orders indicated an order for triad paste (a zinc-oxide based sterile coating designed to manage low to moderate levels of exudate (drainage), while promoting a moist wound healing environment) to the coccyx (base of the spine, near the top of the buttocks) was implemented on 9/2/24. Review of the Pressure Injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a required Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for one Resident (#91) with a diagnosed mental condition, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Resident #91 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and alcohol abuse. Review of the Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) admission Note, dated 1/1/24, indicated the Resident's past medical history included bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder. Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation for Resident #91, dated 2/19/24, indicated the Resident's diagnoses included bipolar disorder and alcohol abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #91, dated 12/3/24, indicated under Section I (Active Diagnoses) the Resident had bipolar disorder coded as an active diagnosis. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a Level 1 PASARR was completed for Resident #91. During an interview on 12/23/24 at 4:31 P.M., Social Worker #1 said that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan to meet the physical, psychosocial, and functional needs for one Resident (#91), out of 28 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to address Resident #91's BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure, a non-invasive ventilation therapy that delivers air through a face mask to help with breathing) machine use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled C-Pap (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) and Bi-PAP Ventilatory System, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Place the mask or pillows on the patient's face, and explain to the patient that he or she should breathe in and out normally. Resident #91 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels), and obstructive sleep apnea (airway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper care and treatment of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line device (inserted into a vein in the upper arm and is advanced until the internal tip of the catheter is in the superior vena cava, one of the central venous system veins that carries blood to the heart) was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#92), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained and implemented for the care and maintenance of the Resident's PICC line. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Central Venous Access Device Flushing, dated January 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: 2. A prescriber order is required for vascular access device (VAD) flushing. The order will be specific with regards to flush solution, volume, and frequency. 3. The VAD will be flushed before and after intravenous medication administration, in between multiple medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, for one Resident (#92) of 28 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs and was not used for an excessive duration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's Fosfomycin (an antibiotic) was administered for only one weekly dose instead of daily, resulting in an additional three administrations of the medication. Findings include: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone), resistance to Vancomycin (an antibiotic), ESBL resistance (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase, enzymes produced by some bacteria that cause resistance to many common antibiotics), and Crohn's disease (an inflammatory bowel disease) with fistulas (connections between two body parts that don't normally connect). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/9/24, indicated Resident #92 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, for Resident #53, the facility failed to ensure that a bottle of Fluticasone nasal spray (a medication used to treat allergy symptoms), a Trelegy inhaler (a medication used to treat symptoms of lung disease, such as shortness of breath and wheezing), a bottle of Calcium Carbonate chewable tablets (a medication used to treat indigestion), and a tube of Diclofenac cream (a topical medication used to treat pain) were not left unsecured in the Resident's room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated February 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel. -Storage for other medications will be limited to a locked medication room. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient support staff were available to carry out food and nutrition services to provide a dignified dining experience and maintain clean and well stocked nourishment kitchenettes. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure all meals provided to residents were served on dishware, not Styrofoam; and 2. Ensure 4 of 4 nourishment kitchenettes were adequately cleaned and stocked daily, per facility policy. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 3:29 P.M., the Ombudsman said the facility has been using Styrofoam instead of dishware during meal service for almost a year and a half, but not daily. The Ombudsmen said the residents cannot cut with plastic utensils. The Ombudsmen further said the facility had decreased the use of Styrofoam from all meals to just breakfast and dinner. During a resident group meeting with the surveyor on 9/27/23 at 10:30 A.M., 6 of 6 residents said that it is typical for meals to be delivered on Styrofoam. The residents in attendance said that all last week, referring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food is labeled, dated, and stored according to facility policy, and ensure adequate sanitation of equipment in the main kitchen, and 4 of 4 nourishment kitchenettes; and 2. Ensure dish washer temperatures were adequate to wash and sanitize all dishware; and 3. Provide a thermometer or device (T-stick) to ensure the foods brought from home were reheated to an internal temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F), to prevent potential foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dietary Department, dated May 2015, indicated but was not limited to: Food Service It is the policy of this facility that all food stored, prepared, and served within the facility will meet, at a minimum, all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to maintain and consistently implement an infection prevention and control program. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Follow COVID-19 testing guidance during a COVID-19 outbreak for staff; 2. Ensure glucose monitoring equipment was cleaned per written policies and procedures to prevent the potential spread of infection; 3. Ensure two staff members appropriately wore their surgical masks covering their nose; and 4. Ensure the removal of resident's personal items and terminally clean the room, before a new resident was admitted to the room to prevent the potential spread of infection. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Pandemic Resident and Staff Testing, dated as last reviewed/revised 5/16/23, indicated but was not limited to the following: -An outbreak is defined as a new COVID-19 infection in any healthcare personnel (HCP) or any nursing home-onset COVID-19 infection in a resident. -Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented for four Residents (#70, #87, #106, and #18), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #70, implement his/her activities of daily living (ADL) care plan of utilizing two staff members during care; 2. For Resident #87, develop a care plan for cardiac conditions and the use of high risk medications; 3. For Resident #106: a. develop a care plan for a pressure ulcer and for the use of antibiotics, and b. implement his/her alteration in skin integrity care plans; and 4. For Resident #18, develop a care plan for impaired skin integrity of the left lateral ankle. Findings include: 1. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in September 2017 with the following diagnoses: anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by a complete loss of oxygen to the brain resulting in death of brain cells), abnormal posture, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/25/23, indicated Resident #70 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain professional standards in managing and caring for urinary catheter devices for two Residents (#70 and #15), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #70, to ensure that catheter care and flushes were provided per physician's orders to prevent blockage; and 2. For Resident #15, to ensure that catheter care and monitoring of bedside drainage was performed every shift to prevent catheter complications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Section U-Urinary Catheter, dates as reviewed March 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility that all residents with catheters will receive catheter care to prevent irritation and possible infection. 1. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in September 2017 with the following diagnoses: anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by a complete loss of oxygen to the brain resulting in death of brain cells), muscle weakness, neuromuscular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for two Residents (#70 and #62), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #70, to ensure tracheostomy (trach- an opening created in the windpipe to allow air and oxygen to reach the lungs) care and respiratory evaluations were done per physician's orders and to maintain and monitor the Resident's trach and equipment; and 2. For Resident #62, to ensure Oxygen was administered according to physician's orders. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Tracheostomy Suctioning and Care, dated as revised 9/1/17, indicated but was not limited to: -the objective is to maintain a clear and patent (unobstructed) airway. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in September 2017 with the following diagnoses: anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by a complete loss of oxygen to the brain resulting in death of brain cells),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff completed training as outlined in the Facility Assessment tool. Specifically, the facility failed to provide documentation that all training was completed for 3 out of 5 staff training records reviewed. In addition, the facility could not verify all licensed nursing staff currently working completed all their competencies and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) training was a minimum of 12 hours. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, most recent revision dated 8/1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: Staff training/education and competencies: -Employee competencies are those traits, skills, or attributes that employees need to perform their job most effectively. These competencies will vary by job and position, but there are some commonalities that apply to just about any job in just about any organization. -Training topics common to all employees of Plymouth Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center include: -Communication -Resident rights and facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed the required no less than 12 hours of annual training, which at a minimum must include dementia and abuse training for 1 of 2 CNA education files reviewed. In addition, the facility could not provide documentation to show CNAs working in the building completed at least 12 hours of annual in-service training. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, most recent revision dated 8/1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: Staff training/education and competencies Training for nurses' aides includes: -Required in-service training for nurses' aides, in-service and training must: -Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurses' aides and must be no less than 12 hours per year. -Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. -Address areas of weakness as determined in nurses' aide performance reviews and facility assessment and may address the special needs of residents as determined by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a discussion regarding advance directives occurred for one sampled Resident (#46), in a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with a history of rectal cancer and new diagnosis of lung cancer. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/8/23, indicated the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired, as evidenced by a score of 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of the medical record indicated the Health Care Proxy (HCP) was activated on 8/12/23. Review of the medical record, including progress notes, care plan meeting notes, and assessments for Resident #46 failed to indicate evidence of a discussion regarding advance directives with the activated HCP. Review of the physician's progress note, dated 9/4/23, indicated the facility was waiting for the activated HCP to complete the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST). Review of the handwritten physician's orders included an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified of recommended medication changes for one Resident (#78) in order to alter the treatment, in a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner of recommendations from Hospice to increase pain medications and decrease psychotropic medications. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in November 2020 with a diagnosis of dementia and hospice services were initiated in September 2023. Review of the medical record included the following recommendations from hospice on 9/21/23: -decrease Trazodone (antidepressant) to 50 milligrams (mg) twice per day -decrease Zyprexa (antipsychotic) to 2.5 mg twice per day -start Morphine (narcotic for pain management) 20 mg/milliliter (ml); give 0.125 ml=2.5 mg by mouth three times per day at 8:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. for pain. Additional recommendations noted as to have on hand, does not need this visit: -Morphine 20 mg/ml give 0.25 ml=5 mg every four hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the bathroom in a clean, comfortable, working order for one Resident (#63), out of a sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses of dementia and Parkinson's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/4/23, indicated the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a score of 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 9/26/23 at 9:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #63's bathroom and found the toilet clogged, the water was running in the sink, the floor molding was lifting away from the wall on the left side and from behind the toilet, the sink was pulled away from the wall with an approximate 2-3 inch gap, the wall paper behind the sink was peeling, the wooden bracket built to support the sink was pulled away on the left side of the sink, and the 11 tiles in front of the toilet and to the right were heavily soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement the physician's orders for an air mattress and accurately document its use for one Resident (#105) with a history of pressure ulcers, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed - Use Of Specialty, dated April 2015, indicated but was not limited to: - Specialty beds are used to provide pressure relieving capabilities for select residents/patients with multiple Stage 2 pressure ulcers on more than one turning surface, Stage 3 pressure ulcers and Stage 4 pressure ulcers, residents/patients with full thickness wounds and with select other needs. - Procedure: assess each resident individually for appropriate specialty bed therapy, obtain approval for the use of the specialty beds according to corporate policies and order according to policy, and provide correct mattress setting if needed. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility in February 2021 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed for one Resident (#70), out of a total sample of 27 residents, to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and assistance to prevent two falls. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls Management, dated as revised August 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -A fall is defined as any incident in which a resident unintentionally has a change in elevation/plane, including an incident where a resident rolls off a bed or mattress. -Anytime a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred. -The interdisciplinary team will develop, initiate, and implement an appropriate individualized care plan. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in September 2017 with the following diagnoses: anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by a complete loss of oxygen to the brain resulting in death of brain cells), abnormal posture, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/25/23, indicated Resident #70 was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#105) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, undated, included but was not limited to: - It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. - Social Service will screen each resident for a history of trauma upon admission. - Documentation regarding the resident's psychosocial well-being including their response to stressful life events/trauma and coping mechanisms will be reflected in the Initial Social Service Assessment and/or Social Service Progress Notes. - A trauma informed care plan will be documented in the resident's medical record by Social Service in conjunction with the IDT. Resident #105 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs, without adequate monitoring for signs/symptoms of adverse consequences (i.e., side effects) to ensure the safe administration of medications for one Resident (#87), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor for adverse side effects of an anticoagulant (blood thinning medication to prevent clots), including signs/symptoms of bruising, bleeding, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT-blood clot). Findings include: Resident #87 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with the following diagnoses: fracture of fifth lumbar vertebrae, fracture of the sacrum, cardiac pacemaker, atrioventricular heart block, hypertension, and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/17/23, indicated Resident #87 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Additionally, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications without adequate monitoring for behaviors to ensure the safe administration of medications for one Resident (#87) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for Resident #87, resident specific, targeted behaviors were identified and monitored for the use of Xanax (used to treat anxiety), Buspar (used to treat anxiety), Zoloft (used to treat depression and anxiety) and Trazodone (used to treat depression). Findings include: Resident #87 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with the following diagnoses: anxiety, depression, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/17/23, indicated Resident #87 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and takes psychotropic (anti-anxiety and anti-depressant) medications daily. Review of the current Physician's Orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and only authorized personnel were permitted access. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated February 2018, indicated but was not limited to: -Storage for other medications will be limited to a locked medication room. On 9/27/23 at 1:48 P.M., the surveyor observed the [NAME] Unit (a locked unit with multiple cognitively impaired residents) medication room door to be propped open, with no nursing staff present at the nurses' station. Nurse #4 returned to the medication cart located outside of the nurses' station at 1:51 P.M. At 1:59 P.M., Nurse #4 left the medication cart and entered the activity/dining room, the medication room door continued to be propped open and unattended with no nursing staff present at the nurses' station. Residents were present in the area of the nurses' station both times the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and records reviewed for one Resident (#18) of 27 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide timely dental services. Specifically, for Resident #18, the facility failed to initiate replacement of lost/missing dentures. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dental Services/Dentures, dated as revised September 2017, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility must promptly, within 3 days refer the resident with lost or damaged dentures for dental services. If a referral does not occur within 3 days, the facility must provide documentation of what was done to ensure the resident could still eat and drink adequately while awaiting dental services and the extenuating circumstances that led to the delay. -An investigation will be conducted to determine the cause for loss or damage to a resident's dentures. If staff mishandling of dentures is found to be a causative factor, the facility will be responsible for repair or replacement. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or staff properly disposed of cigarette butts in designated smoking receptacles. Findings include:Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) circular letter, dated November 10, 2011, titled Smoking Safety in Long Term Care Facilities indicated but was not limited to the following:-The Life Safety Code (NFPA 101, 2000 ed., 19.7.4) requires each smoking area be provided with ashtrays made of noncombustible material and safe design.-Metal containers with self-closing covers into which ashtrays can be emptied must be readily available.Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking, dated revised November 2020, indicated but was not limited to:-Purpose to afford residents the privilege of smoking while maintaining a safe and clean environment within the policy of this facility, that is also respectful to the non-smoker.On 1/28/26 at 6:55 A.M., the surveyor observed the temporary designated smoking area and identified a tall black receptacle for cigarette butts with numerous cigarette…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-09-29 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, interview, and records reviewed for three Residents (#18, #116, and #12), of 27 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure written notice for transfer or discharge was provided to the Residents and/or Resident Representatives before transferring to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Planning Policy and Procedure, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents will only be discharged or transferred for the following reasons: The transfer/discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in this facility. - Social Service will ensure systems are implemented to provide written notification to the resident/responsible party prior to transfer/discharge. - Acute Care Setting Transfer/Discharges: In the event of an unplanned transfer to an acute setting, notice will be provided in writing to the resident/responsible party as soon as practicable. 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus, hypertension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-09-29 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, interview, and records reviewed for three Residents (#18, #116, and #12), of 27 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure written notification of the bed hold policy was provided to Residents and/or Resident Representatives prior to hospital transfers. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Planning Policy and Procedure, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents will only be discharged or transferred for the following reasons: The transfer/discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in this facility. - Social Service will ensure systems are implemented to provide written notification to the resident/responsible party prior to transfer/discharge. - Acute Care Setting Transfer/Discharges: In the even of an unplanned transfer to an acute setting, notice will be provided in writing to the resident/responsible party as soon as practicable. 1.Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-09-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the Resident's status for 1 out of 2 closed records reviewed and for one Resident (#70), out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #137, to ensure accuracy when coding discharge status; and 2. For Resident #70, to ensure accuracy when coding falls. Findings include: 1. Resident #137 was admitted to the facility in January 2023. Review of Resident #137's medical record indicated a Physician's Order, dated 7/20/23, may discharge as planned on 7/27/23. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/27/23, indicated Resident discharged home. Review of the Discharge MDS assessment section A, dated 8/3/23, indicated Resident #137 was discharged to an acute care hospital. During an interview on 9/29/23 at 2:15 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said the discharge status of Resident #137 was incorrectly coded and should have been coded as discharged to the community.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$141,373 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $141,373 — penalty dated 2023-09-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5AdviniaCare Orchard, LLCEast Providence, RI 1 of 5Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterCenterville, MA 1 of 5Civita Care BayviewWaterford, CT 1 of 5Civita Care NorthbridgeBridgeport, CT 1 of 5Civita Care Sheriden WoodsBristol, CT 1 of 5Lanessa Extended CareWebster, MA 1 of 5Marlborough Hills Rehabilitation & Health Care CenMarlborough, MA 1 of 5Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLowell, MA 1 of 5Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterHaverhill, MA 1 of 5Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterNorth Easton, MA 1 of 5Southshore Health Care CenterRockland, MA 1 of 5Wadsworth Glen Health Care And Rehabilitation CentMiddletown, CT 1 of 5Worcester Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5AdviniaCare Waterview Villas, LLCEast Providence, RI 2 of 5Berkshire Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterSandisfield, MA 2 of 5Cape Heritage Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSandwich, MA 2 of 5Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5Southbridge Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSouthbridge, MA 2 of 5Webster Manor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWebster, MA 3 of 5Tremont Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterWareham, MA 4 of 5Civita Care MeadowbrookGranby, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA R LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2012
CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2012
CURTIS, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
KAUFMAN, DANIELLEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2018
MOSIER, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE6%since 09/01/2012
REZENDES, LORRIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
SANTILLI, LAWRENCEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER74%since 05/04/2020
WHITCRAFT, CARLYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2019
ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 91%Medicare 4%Other / private 5%

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,675per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225207. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next