Cape Heritage Rehabilitation & Health Care Center
37 Route 6a, Sandwich, MA 02563 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (508) 888-8222 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.1% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.3% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.7% | 15.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.7% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.6% | 21.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.8% | 21.4% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.7% | 77.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.97 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.3%CMS range 46.7–65.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.9%CMS range 10.3–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.6–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 109.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and develop and implement fall interventions for one Resident (#4), out of a sample of 19 residents, resulting in a fall with major injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls Management, last revised August 2018, included but was not limited to: -The facility will utilize all resident/patient related information made available upon admission and ongoing to determine resident/patient at-risk for fall status. The information includes but is not limited to the following: -Hospital admission -Discharge summary -Nursing admission Evaluation -Fall Risk Evaluation -A fall risk evaluation will be conducted on each resident/patient upon admission, with the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) cycle when a significant change in status occurs, annually and following a fall. -The interdisciplinary team will develop, initiate, and implement an appropriate individualized care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor the nutritional status of two Residents (#43 and #42), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility 1. Failed to monitor the weight loss of Resident #43, resulting in a significant weight loss; and 2. Failed to implement nutritional interventions for Resident #42. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Weights, dated August 2015, indicated the following residents would be weighed weekly for four weeks: -residents with unanticipated weight loss of more than 5% in one month -all residents with significant weight loss are reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and interventions implemented as appropriate and are monitored weekly -a weight loss/gain of 5 pounds or more on a resident weighing over 100 pounds, requires a reweigh for verification Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in January 2019 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Review of the care plans indicated Resident #43 was at risk for a nutritional decline related to Parkinson's disease with a goal, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff available to provide nursing services and care required to meet the needs of two Residents (#43 and #40), in a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed 1. For Resident #43, to ensure weekly weights were obtained to monitor weight loss, resulting in significant weight loss; and 2. For Resident #40, to ensure wound care was provided as ordered. Findings include: 1. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in January 2019 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Review of the care plans indicated Resident #43 was at risk for a nutritional decline related to Parkinson's disease with a goal, revised on 5/23/22, to have the weight stable at 165 pounds. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 indicated the following nutritional history: -On 02/04/22, the Resident weighed 176.4 pounds (lbs.). On 03/04/22, the Resident weighed 166.8 lbs. which was a -5.44 % loss in four weeks. -On 02/10/22, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who during his/her admission assessments informed staff that his/her dietary preference was skim milk, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she received his/her drink of preference as identified on his/her care plan and nutritional assessment.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Rights, dated as revised January 2001, indicated that each resident has the right to be fully informed in advance of their care or treatment, to be fully informed in advance of any changes in their care or treatment and to participate in planning their health care and treatment.The Policy further indicated that each resident has the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of their needs and preferences.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2026, diagnoses included but not limited to fracture of the right and left pelvis, major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, gastro-esophageal reflux…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that trash, garbage, and refuse were disposed of and properly contained within a receptable constructed with a tight-fitting lid. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code (a model for safeguarding public health and ensuring food is unadulterated and honestly presented when offered to the consumer) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated outside receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. Proper equipment and supplies must be made available to accomplish thorough and proper cleaning of garbage storage areas and receptacles so that unsanitary conditions can be eliminated. Review of an e-mail from the local Fire Department, dated 2/6/25, to the Department of Public Health indicated but was not limited to the following: -Over the past year, since I have been in this position we have run into several safety concerns and issues with the facility from overflowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure mechanical equipment in the main kitchen was maintained in a safe operating condition, specifically (1) the walk-in freezer, (2) the stove hood, and (3) the ice machine. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 4-5 Maintenance and Operation 4-501 Equipment 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment. (A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under Parts 4-1 and 4-2. (B) EQUIPMENT components such as doors, seals, hinges, fasteners, and kick plates shall be kept intact, tight, and adjusted in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. 1. On 5/15/25 at 8:15 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the walk-in freezer in the main kitchen: -Freezer door unable to fully seal due to ice buildup; -Only two plastic freezer strip curtains were intact, the rest were missing; -Large amount of ice build-up at the base of freezer door, extending into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain their septic system drain field in working order and/or increase pumping of their septic tank to prevent the liquid wastewater from running into their parking lot. Findings include: Review of website www.epa.gov/septic/how-septic-systems-work, included but was not limited to the following information from the federal government: How a typical conventional septic system works: 1. All water runs out of your home from one main drainage pipe into a septic tank. 2. The septic tank is a buried, water-tight container usually made of concrete, fiberglass, or polyethylene. Its job is to hold the wastewater long enough to allow solids to settle down to the bottom forming sludge, while the oil and grease floats to the top as scum. Compartments and a T-shaped outlet prevent the sludge and scum from leaving the tank and traveling into the drainfield area. 3. The liquid wastewater (effluent) then exits the tank into the drainfield. 4. The drainfield is a shallow, covered, excavation made in unsaturated soil. Pretreated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure it provided a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for the residents residing on one unit ([NAME]) out of three units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Policy for Environmental Rounds, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Environmental rounds will be an integral part of daily routine and will also be performed regularly throughout the entire facility. -Environmental survey worksheets will be retained for review to illustrate the improvement of quality of life within the facility and for review/comparison purposes within the facility over a period of time. Review of the most recent Resident Council Minutes, dated 4/24/25, indicated it has been noted there was a lack of maintenance in the building. On 5/15/25 at 8:40 A.M., during the initial tour of the [NAME] unit, the surveyor observed the following: -Two keypads to the unit were loose (due to missing screws) and duct tape was visibly holding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident with an alteration in skin integrity related to a wound, specifically a gastrocutaneous fistula (an abnormal opening between the stomach and the skin allowing gastric contents to leak onto the skin) at an old feeding tube site, received necessary treatment and services to promote healing for one Resident (#85), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to transcribe and implement wound care per recommendations by the stoma clinic, complete wound care as ordered, and to notify the physician when the surrounding skin at the wound site was macerated (white and soggy skin from exposure to excessive moisture from body fluids). Findings include: Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th Ed. (2019) indicated: Scope of Practice, Licensure, and Certification: The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. The National Council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain one of three kitchenettes in a clean and sanitary condition; and 2. Properly label and date food products in the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy provided by the Administrator for food storage in the kitchen, which was untitled and not dated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The Dietary Department will be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness. -All food items shall be labeled and dated to allow for rotation of supplies. -Meats will be stored on the bottom shelves of the refrigerator to prevent drippings from contaminating food on lower shelves. -All items stored in the refrigerator will be covered and labeled with contents and the date. -All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and test tray results, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, and was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for two of two test trays. Findings include: During initial resident screening on 4/7/24, the survey team identified the following concerns expressed by residents about food palatability: -Resident #8 said the food could be ice cold and could be improved. -Resident #88 said the food was sometimes not warm enough. -Resident #70 said the food was deplorable; the taste was not good and was usually not warm despite mentioning these concerns during previous food committee meetings. -Resident #38 said the food was always stone cold, especially the soup. The Resident said these things had previously been discussed at Resident Council. -Resident #45 said the food was terrible and cold all the time. -Resident #74 said sometimes the food temperature was not right.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the main kitchen was maintained in a sanitary condition; 2. Ensure food items were properly labeled and dated in the main kitchen refrigerators; 3. Ensure food and drink items were properly stored, labeled, and dated in two of three kitchenettes; 4. Handle ready-to-eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross-contamination (transfer of pathogens (biological contaminants) from one surface to another). In addition, to ensure the use of gloves was limited to a single use task; and 5. Utilize proper equipment cleaning and sanitation to prevent cross-contact (the inadvertent introduction of an allergen into a product that would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in good repair to promote a homelike environment on one of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to repair areas of chipped and loose textured ceiling, also known as popcorn ceiling, in five resident rooms in one out of three units. Findings include: During an observation with interview on 4/8/24 at 9:30 A.M., the surveyor observed several patches of popcorn ceiling missing from Resident #12's room in the area above the bed. Resident #12 said a storm caused water to leak from the ceiling causing areas of the popcorn ceiling to peel away and fall from the ceiling. Resident #12 said a piece of the popcorn ceiling fell and hit them on the head with no injury occurring. Resident #12 said the edges of the area where the popcorn ceiling was missing were peeling. Resident #12 said the remainder of the popcorn ceiling should be chipped away and repaired. Resident #12 said the ceiling had been in that condition for about three months and did not know why the facility had not yet made the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, for one Resident (#66) of 21 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported to the Department of Public Health's (DPH) Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS-a web-based system that health care facilities must use to report incidents and allegations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation) as required. Specifically, for Resident #66, the facility failed to report alleged abuse by a visitor within the required timeframe. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2/2023, indicated but was not limited to: -Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish it includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, for residents on the [NAME] unit (a locked dementia unit), the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication was secured and not accessible to residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated 2/2018, indicated but was not limited to: -Medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel. -Storage for other medications will be limited to a locked medication room. On 4/8/24 at 1:37 P.M., on the [NAME] unit, where 28 of 30 residents were diagnosed with Alzheimer's/ dementia, the surveyor observed: -Nurse #1 pop one Trazodone (antidepressant) 12.5 milligram (mg) tablet into a medication cup -Nurse #1 place the medication cup on top of the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, policy review, and interviews, for one Resident (#66), out of 21 sampled residents, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. Specifically, for Resident #66, the facility failed to ensure his/her weight was documented in the medical record as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights, dated 8/2015, indicated but was not limited to: -Weights are documented in the resident/patient's medical record and/or weight book Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in July 2019 with the following diagnoses: dementia and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/13/24, indicated Resident #66 had experienced a significant weight loss and was not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. Review of Resident #66's progress note, dated 2/9/24, indicated weights were trending down and his/her physician was made aware. The progress note indicated a new order had been obtained to weigh the Resident weekly for four weeks then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections within the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to infection control protocols for personal protective equipment (PPE) use when providing care and services to residents requiring precautions to prevent the possible spread of germs and illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -Enhanced barrier precautions require the use of gown and gloves for certain residents during specific high-contact resident care activities in which there is an increased risk for transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms. High-contact care activities include bathing/showering, providing hygiene, dressing, transferring, linen changes, toileting, device care and wound care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control and prevention program to help prevent the potential transmission of a communicable disease when the facility was experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19 infections. Specifically, the facility failed to implement outbreak testing for both staff and residents in accordance with the most current guidance and the facility policy. Findings include: During an interview on 11/16/23 at 7:18 A.M., the Administrator said the facility was currently in a COVID-19 outbreak with four resident cases remaining and two staff cases. Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Pandemic Resident and Staff Testing, dated as revised 5/16/23, indicated but was not limited to the following: -An outbreak is identified as a new COVID-19 infection in any healthcare personnel (HCP) or any resident -Upon identification of a single new case of COVID-19 infection in any staff or residents, testing should begin per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of employee education files, and document review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff received the appropriate competencies and skill sets for 5 out of 5 licensed nurses. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool indicated the following: -the facility will actively secure resources to ensure that employees are properly trained and have competency -licensed nurse competencies include: medication administration, IV (intravenous care), tracheostomy care/suctioning, colostomy care, feeding tubes, wound care, etc. Review of the Resident Census and Condition (from CMS-672) provided by the facility on 9/27/22 indicated the following: -8 residents with indwelling or external catheter -5 residents with pressure ulcers -1 resident with IV therapy -1 resident with ostomy care -1 resident with tube feeding Review of the Competency Schedule, provided by the Staff Development Coordinator on 10/4/22 indicated the following competencies, including but not limited to, should be conducted annually for licensed staff: -cardiovascular assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services safely and effectively in the kitchen. Findings include: On 9/27/22 at 8:45 A.M. the surveyor observed the Food Service Director (FSD) doing dishes. During an interview at the time of the observation, the FSD said she had one cook, a diet aide and herself to feed and prepare food for the 90 plus residents. The FSD said the kitchen was short staffed. On 9/27/22 at 8:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Styrofoam containers in the meal trucks. The FSD said the kitchen had been serving meals in the Styrofoam containers because of dishwasher problems, but more because of short staffing. She said short staffing also prevented the kitchen staff from opening the dining room for Resident dining. During an interview on 9/27/22 at 9:25 A.M., Resident #147 complained that all his/her meals were served in to go containers. Resident #147 said the food was cold and he/she felt that it was a constant picnic. On 9/27/22 during the noon meal, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observations, facility failed to ensure that food was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature. Findings include: On 9/27/22 at 9:45 A.M., Resident #147 said his/her meals were served in a Styrofoam container and the food was often served late, was cold, and was not always palatable. Review of the Resident Council minutes for August and September 2022 indicated Resident concerns about food temperatures and palatability of foods. The Resident Council requested a Food Committee. On 9/28/22 at 11:00 A. M., the surveyor held a Group Meeting with 17 residents in attendance. The residents reported concerns of having their meals served in Styrofoam containers, cold food, terrible coffee, and the meats were not recognizable. The Residents said that they had requested a Food Committee and that it was supposed to start. During an interview on 9/27/22 at 8:45 A.M., the Food Supervisor (FS) said she was unaware of any food complaints. The FS said she did not have a Food Committee and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and interview, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan that described their approach to improving the quality of life, care, and services delivered to residents in the facility. Findings include: A review of the facility's QAPI policy, dated 4/2015, indicated the facility's QAPI plan serves to accomplish the following: -Address all systems of care management practices. -Always assure clinical care, quality of life and resident choice. -Ensure safety and high quality with all clinical interventions. -Emphasize autonomy and choice in daily life for residents/agents. -Utilize the best available evidence to define and measure goals. -Have a written QAPI Plan adhering to these principles. -Develop a culture that involves leadership seeking from facility staff, and their families and/or representatives. -Assure adequate resources exist to conduct QAPI efforts. -Designate one or more persons to be accountable for QAPI. -Developing leadership and facility-wide training on QAPI, ensuring staff time, equipment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure infection control policies and procedures were reviewed at least annually; 2. Document staff with signs/symptoms (e.g., fever) of COVID-19 according to their surveillance plan; 3. Implement return to work criteria for healthcare personnel (HCP) with SARS-CoV-2 infection; 4. Implement appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE); 5. Post proper signage for residents on transmission-based precautions (TBP) to ensure staff were aware of precaution needs; 6. Ensure adequate drainage from a washing machine while in operation in the laundry room; and 7. Ensure staff performed proper handwashing and the proper cleaning of glucometer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program that promoted appropriate use of antibiotics and included a system to monitor antibiotic use. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To adequately track infections to review for trends and review antibiotic therapy usage to provide feedback, and 2. For Resident #40, to ensure the criteria for the initiation of antibiotics, per the facility's policy and infection control requirements, was followed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: It is the policy of this facility to treat only symptomatic infections meeting criteria, and to promote antibiotic stewardship to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use, improve patient care outcomes and reduce possible consequences of antimicrobial use. -The facility will establish an antimicrobial stewardship team (AMS) dedicated to improving antimicrobial use -All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespreadReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, policy review, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives/families were notified of each new COVID-19 positive staff member or resident case by 5:00 P.M. the following day. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 New Facility Outbreak for MA, revised 3/23/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Legal representatives, families, residents, and staff should be notified by 5 pm the following day after a new positive case (staff or resident) with documentation of notification Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes, updated February 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Notify residents and families promptly about identification of SARS-CoV-2 in the facility and maintain ongoing frequent communication with residents and families with updates on the situation and facility actions During an interview on 9/27/22 at 9:01 A.M., the Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespreadPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff conducted testing and specimen collection in a manner that was consistent with current standards of practice for conducting COVID-19 tests. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure testing of staff whose COVID-19 vaccination status was not up to date was based on the level of community transmission according to the recommended frequency; 2. Ensure documentation of COVID-19 testing was completed including the results of each staff test, and 3. Perform BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card testing (rapid testing) correctly for five out of five staff members observed. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 9/27/22 at 1:15 P.M., the Infection Preventionist (IP) said the facility used BinaxNOW rapid testing and all staff, including contract staff, were being tracked for compliance with COVID-19 testing protocols by utilizing an alphabetical spreadsheet. The IP said he was responsible for oversight and checked the spreadsheet three times a day to ensure staff were testing as required,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician for four Residents (#3, #43, #40, #147 and #6), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify physicians of the following: 1. A recommended antipsychotic medication for Resident #3 with delusions and hallucinations; 2. A change in weight for Resident #43 with a history of significant weight loss; 3. A recommendation to a change in wound treatments for Resident #40; 3. A new prescription from an Endocrinologist for Resident #147; and 4. A recommended antipsychotic medication, Seroquel, for Resident #6. Findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in December 2021 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #3 was seen by the consultant Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 7/21/22. The Psychiatric NP progress note indicated Resident #3 reported delusions and visual hallucinations and that he/she was bothered by the delusions and hallucinations. The Psychiatric NP made a recommendation to start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for seven Residents (#8, #38, #48, #6, #94, #77, and #147), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #8, to develop a care plan for the use of a blood thinning medication; 2. For Resident #38, to implement care plan interventions for falls; 3. For Resident #48, to implement care plan interventions for an indwelling urinary catheter; 4. For Resident #6, to develop a comprehensive care plan for psychotropic medication use that identified target behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, and measurable goals of treatment; 5. For Resident #94, to develop a care plan for smoking; 6. For Resident #77, to assess or develop a plan of care for the treatment of his/her laryngeal stoma (hole (opening) made in the skin in front of your neck to allow you to breath), and 7. For Resident #147, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents were provided care in accordance with professional standards of practice for four Residents (#4, #90, #6, and #8), from a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed 1. For Resident #4, to ensure physician's orders for a bowel protocol was implemented which resulted in the Resident not having a bowel movement for seven days; 2. For Resident #90, to ensure the physician's order for an air mattress was implemented and accurately documented; 3. For Resident #6, to ensure a physician's order was transcribed as per the acceptable professional standards of clinical practice; and 4. For Resident #8, to ensure the Resident's pacemaker was monitored and evaluated as per the facility policy and standards of practice. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the 6/15/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #4 has severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC- a long catheter inserted through a peripheral vein then into a larger vein to administer intravenous (IV) treatments over a long period of time). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff (a) administered flushes, (b) changed the dressing, (c) measured the external catheter length, and (d) monitored the IV site for one Resident (#77), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the Pharmacy's policy, followed by the facility, for PICC Catheter flushing and care, undated, indicated: -Flushing is performed to ensure and maintain cannula patency; -A physician's order is required to flush a PICC; -Document date and time of flushing, flushing agents, and amounts, on the Infusion Medication Administration Record (IMAR); and -Document and date the care on the Infusion Therapy Flowsheet (ITF). Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including wound infection that required IV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that emergency drug kits were re-ordered when medications were dispensed from the emergency kits in two out of three medication rooms observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Emergency Boxes (EBox), undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: Contents and quantities of each EBox are determined by the facility's Medical Director/Director of Nursing - Each EBox will be locked with a tamper resistant lock indicating if the box has been opened. - Each box that is opened needs to be returned to the pharmacy for replenishment. - Each box contains a label with the soonest to expire medication clearly displayed on the outside of the box. - Boxes should be reviewed monthly and returned to the pharmacy to be replaced. - Antibiotic PO EBox - Emergency Ebox - Super Ebox - Injectable Med Ebox - IV Ebox - Insulin Ebox - Anaphylaxis/Glucagon/SPS Ebox A laminated instruction of each EBox is provided by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that for six Residents (#38, #48, #4, #90, #40, and #19), out of a total sample of 19 residents, that each Resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an appropriate diagnosis was identified, targeted behaviors/signs and symptoms were monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of psychotropic medication, and/or potential side effects were identified and monitored to promote or maintain the Residents' highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being, per the facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Management, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Each resident's drug regimen will be free from unnecessary drugs -Administration of psychoactive medications will focus on the individual needs of the resident, and will be prescribed only when necessary and clinically indicated to treat specific conditions and symptoms as diagnosed and documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were safely stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain a temperature log for one out of one medication refrigerators to preserve the integrity of the vaccines stored. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 2 degrees Celsius (C) (36 degrees Fahrenheit (F)) and 8 degrees C (46 degrees F) with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring -The facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures -The facility should check the refrigerator or freezer in which vaccines are stored, at least two times a day, per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines On 10/5/22 at 8:22 A.M., the surveyor reviewed the vaccine medication refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless immunization was medically contraindicated, or the resident had already been immunized for 38 of 92 residents currently residing in house. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Resident Vaccination Policy, revised 3/16/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) by offering our residents immunization to COVID-19 -It is the policy of this facility, in collaboration with the medical director, to have an immunization program against COVID-19 disease in accordance with national standards of practice -COVID-19 vaccinations and boosters will be offered as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and/or U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines unless such immunization is medically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0888 — patternEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to 1) Develop a COVID-19 vaccination policy for staff that included all the required components that were current and based on national standards; 2) Ensure additional precautions, intended to mitigate the transmission and spread of COVID-19, were implemented for all staff who were not fully vaccinated for COVID-19; and 3) Track and document the COVID-19 vaccination status for two of eight staff members sampled. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Employee Vaccination Policy, revised April 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility will require and maintain for each individual staff member proof of vaccination status or the individual's declination statement and maintain a central system to track the vaccination status of all personnel. Individual proof of current vaccination may include, but is not limited to, copy of CDC Vaccination Card, copy of vaccination from their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light system on 1 of 3 Resident units. Findings include: On 9/30/22 beginning at 8:50 A.M., on the [NAME] Unit, the surveyor observed several call lights to be lit up above the doors of residents' rooms, and several staff members were observed to not be responding to the call lights. On 9/30/22 at 9:20 A.M., the surveyor arrived at the nurses' station and observed that the call bell system was disconnected. The surveyor observed multiple call lights lit and staff were observed to not be responding to the call lights. The surveyor connected the call bell system and could hear the audible alert; the alert could be heard at the nursing desk and throughout the unit hallways. On 9/30/22 at 9:35 A.M., Nurse #10 said the call bell system does not work and could not remember when she last heard the call bell working on the unit. Nurse #10 said if the receiver of the system is engaged, the sound cannot be stopped and continually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Promote dignity while dining for all residents in the facility by serving meals in Styrofoam containers for almost a year; and 2. Ensure the dignity of Resident (#48) by not covering a urinary catheter bag. Findings include: 1. On 9/27/22 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyor conducted the initial tour of the facility's kitchen. The surveyor observed Styrofoam containers on the tray carts. The surveyor reviewed the dishwasher temperature logs, which indicated the dishwasher had not been functioning properly for months prior to 9/23/22. The Food Service Director said the dishwasher had been broken and was recently repaired on 9/23/22, but she continued to use Styrofoam containers after it had been repaired because of low staffing. On 9/27/22 at 9:45 A.M. on the [NAME] Unit, Resident #147 said all his/her meals had been served in to go containers and wonders why as this feels like a constant picnic. Resident #147 said the to go containers did not keep the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directive decisions were made by the activated Health Care Proxy (HCP) for Resident #37, who was deemed to lack capacity to make health care decisions. The total sample was 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #37 appointed a Health Care Proxy prior to admission to the facility. A Documentation of Resident Incapacity Pursuant to Massachusetts Health Care Proxy Act M.G.L. c201D indicated Resident #37 lacked capacity to make health care decisions, invoking the Health Care Proxy as the medical decision maker as of 6/15/20, due to dementia. A review of the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) for Resident #37 indicated advanced directive decisions of Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Intubate was signed by the Resident on 6/15/20, the same day the physician determined the Resident was unable to make health care decisions. During an interview on 9/28/22 at 3:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to personal privacy and confidentiality was promoted and protected for one Resident (#6), from a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was provided privacy during a neuropsychiatric evaluation conducted by the facility's consultant Psychiatrist in the Resident's room. Findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia and depression. On 9/28/22 at 9:42 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #6 sitting upright in bed and the facility's consultant Psychiatrist was seated in a chair talking to Resident #6. The door to the Resident's room was opened wide, the privacy curtain was not pulled, and the Resident's roommate was sitting on his/her bed next to the clinician. On 9/28/22 at 9:45 A.M., the surveyor and Social Worker observed the clinician speaking to Resident #6. The Social Worker said the Psychiatrist was performing a neuropsychiatric examination and should have taken the Resident to a private space to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for two Residents (#4 and #72), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure 1. For Resident #4, two incidents of bruises of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated and reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) as required; and 2. For Resident #72, an allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated September 2020, included but was not limited to: -Policy: Every [NAME] facility has the responsibility to ensure that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of his or her personal property; -Procedure: Identifying events, occurrences, patterns, and trends of potential abuse for residents; -Performing internal facility investigations of alleged violations and identification of staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported bruises of unknown origin to the Department of Public Health (DPH) for one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse Prohibition Policy (undated), included but was not limited to: -Reporting/Documentation Requirements: All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, the the Administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were investigated for two Residents (#4 and #72), out of a sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #4, to investigate two incidents of bruises of unknown origin; and 2. For Resident #72, to investigate allegations of sexual abuse and report results to the representative. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated September 2020, included but was not limited to: -Policy: Every [NAME] facility has the responsibility to ensure that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of his or her personal property; -Procedure: Identifying events, occurrences, patterns, and trends of potential abuse for residents; -Performing internal facility investigations of alleged violations and identification of staff members responsible for investigating incidents and the reporting of same to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident and/or the Resident's representative and the Ombudsman were provided a written notice of a bed hold transfer as required for one Resident (#95), out of a total sample of 19 residents and three closed records. Findings include: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with medical diagnoses including pain in left hip, unspecified osteoarthritis, and other chronic pain. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident #95 was transferred to the hospital emergency department (ED) in July 2022 for further evaluation. Review of a Nurse's Note, dated 7/2022 at 12:11 P.M., indicated Resident requesting to be transferred to the hospital for assessment and evaluation related to increase in pain and decrease in lower extremity movement. The nurse's note indicated the physician was notified, and family was made aware. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated July 2022, including a written telephone order to transfer the Resident to the hospital for assessment and evaluation related to increase pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident's representative was provided a written notice of a bed hold transfer as required for one Resident (#95), out of a total sample of 19 residents and three closed records. Findings include: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with medical diagnoses including pain in left hip, unspecified osteoarthritis, and other chronic pain. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident #95 was transferred to the hospital emergency department (ED) in July 2022. Review of a Nurse's Note, dated 7/19/22 at 12:11 P.M., indicated Resident requesting to be transferred to the hospital for assessment and evaluation related to increase in pain and decrease in lower extremity movement. The nurse's note indicated the physician was notified, and family was made aware. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/29/22, indicated Resident #95 was discharged to the hospital. The MDS indicated return anticipated. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident was discharged to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one Resident (#94), in a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #94 included a Smoking Evaluation and Safety Screen, dated 9/7/22. The evaluation indicated Resident #94 was a current smoker and would be smoking at the facility. Review of the care plans for Resident #94 failed to include any documentation regarding smoking or a plan for smoking. On 9/28/22 at 4:15 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #94 smoking outside during the supervised smoking time. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 9/14/22, indicated Resident #94 was not a smoker. During an interview on 9/30/22 at 10:05 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said she was unaware Resident #94 was a smoker and it should have been indicated on the MDS dated [DATE].
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to evaluate for effectiveness and revise the comprehensive care plan for one Resident (#40), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #40, to review and revise the care plan to indicate a new pressure injury developed from the use of a catheter leg bag and to indicate interventions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, undated, indicated the following: -Care Plans are oriented toward preventing avoidable decline in clinical and functional levels, maintaining a specific level of functioning -Care Plans were to be evaluated and revised as needed, but at least quarterly Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diabetes and had a suprapubic catheter. Review of the Wound Consultant's Progress Notes indicated on 8/17/22 Resident #40 developed a pressure area to the left medial lower leg caused by the catheter leg bag. The Wound Consultant noted the pressure injury had a scant serosanguineous exudate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#43) received assistance with eating. The total sample was 14 residents. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in January 2019 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Review of the care plans for Resident #43 indicated the Resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) deficit related to Parkinson's disease and needed assistance with sequencing tasks. The interventions indicated the level of assistance may fluctuate depending on tremors and level of fatigue, staff were to provide interventions as needed for task completion when self-performance fluctuated and included Resident #43 needed continual 1 to 8 supervision during eating. Review of an Occupational Therapy (OT) progress note, dated 11/4/22, indicated Resident #43 was able to feed self with regular utensils and a lip plate, with minimal verbal cues. On 11/30/22 at 11:59 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #43 eating a lunch of spaghetti and mixed vegetables as follows: -At 12:06 P.M., the Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to promote healing for one Resident (#40), in a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diabetes and a wound to the right heel and had developed multiple diabetic wounds. Review of the Wound Consultant's Progress Note, dated 9/14/22, indicated the diabetic wound of the right heel measured 2.0 centimeters (cm) in length by 2.2 cm in width, with no depth measured. The notes indicated the wound showed signs of slow progression toward healing with a plan to continue to off-load the wound. Review of the September 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) on 9/28/22 indicated the following treatment: -8/1/22 Right heel: Cleanse with normal saline wash, pat dry, then apply nickel-thick Santyl ointment to wound bed, cover with ABD pad, wrap with Kerlix, change daily. The September 2022 TAR indicated the right heel treatment was not completed on 9/2, 9/5, 9/7,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments to a pressure injury were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to promote healing for one Resident (#40), in a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diabetes and had a suprapubic catheter. Review of the Wound Consultant's Progress Notes indicated on 8/17/22 Resident #40 developed a pressure area to the left medial lower leg caused by the catheter leg bag. The Wound Consultant noted the pressure injury had a scant serosanguineous exudate (draining clear liquid with red blood) and the wound bed was 100% dry stable eschar/necrosis measuring 4.0 centimeters (cm) length by 2.7 cm width with an immeasurable depth. The plan for the wound was to check positioning of catheter leg bag frequently and off-load the device from the wound and the following treatment was ordered: apply protective Optifoam dressing and change daily. Review of the September 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) on 9/29/22 indicated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #72, admitted with a catheter was assessed for the removal of the catheter as soon as possible, out of three sampled residents with catheters. Findings include: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 following a fall at home with pelvic and ischium fractures and a new urinary catheter. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #72 continued to have a Foley catheter, one year after admission. Review of the nursing Foley Catheter Evaluation, dated 9/19/21, indicated Resident #72 had a Foley catheter for less than a month related to pelvic and ischium fractures with a plan for removal. Review of a Physician's Progress Note, dated 9/20/21, indicated Resident #72 had urinary retention, with a Foley catheter present, had previously failed a voiding trial at the hospital, and another voiding trial would be attempted. Review of a Physician's Progress Note, dated 10/5/21, indicated Resident #72 should be referred to urology. Review of the nursing Foley Catheter Evaluation, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to administer medications and prevent complications of an enteral feeding tube (a method of providing nutrition and fluids directly into the stomach via a gastric tube (G-tube), which is inserted through the abdominal wall to give direct access to the stomach or upper intestines) to one Resident (#67), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Pharmacy policy and procedure titled Prescription Association Procedure for Enteral Tube Medication Administration, dated 2017, included but was not limited to the following: - The facility assures the safe and effective administration of medications via enteral tubes and the routes and methods of the administration of medications are based on assessment and consultation with the physician. - Procedure includes the Physician order which specifies the route of administration of all medications, the preparation of the medication (crushing, mixing with water), flush the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility 1. Failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with the facility policy/protocols and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#77) with a trachea/laryngeal stoma (a stoma is a surgically created hole (opening) made in the windpipe/skin in front of your neck to allow you to breathe). Specifically, the facility failed to: a.) Obtain physician's orders to provide a person-centered care plan for care of trachea/laryngeal stoma; b.) Implement the facility protocol to maintain a clear and patent airway; and c.) Provide emergency bedside tracheostomy equipment needed for accidental occlusion (the blockage or closing of an opening) or mucus plugging (buildup of thick mucus); and 2. Failed to ensure proper care and storage of respiratory equipment and maintain consistent documentation of respiratory care for one Resident (#71). Findings include: 1. Review of The National Tracheostomy Safety Project manual dated 2013…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that for three Residents (#8, #90, and #67), out of a total sample of 19 residents, that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor for potential adverse consequences related to the use of an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication. Findings include: 1. Review of the manufacturer's (Bristol-[NAME] Squibb) website, revised September 2016, indicated Plavix (Clopidogrel) is a P2Y12 platelet inhibitor indicated for acute coronary syndrome, recent myocardial infarction (MI), recent stroke, or established peripheral arterial disease to reduce the rate of MI and stroke. Adverse Reactions -Bleeding, including life-threatening and fatal bleeding, is the most reported adverse reaction Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including sick sinus syndrome (heart rhythm disorder) and had a cardiac pacemaker. Review of current Physician's Orders, dated 9/1/22 through 9/30/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated the preferences of 1 Resident (#94), in a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility in August 2022. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/14/22, indicated Resident #94 scored a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired. During an interview on 9/27/22 at 9:40 A.M., Resident #94 said he/she wanted fresh fruit every day for breakfast, that he/she did not like the other breakfast foods and preferred to eat fresh fruit for breakfast. He/she said the fresh fruit did not always come on the breakfast tray, sometimes he/she received canned fruit and sometimes no fruit at all. On 9/30/22 at 7:57 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #94 in the unit dining room having breakfast. The Resident did not have any fruit on his/her meal tray. At this time, the Resident said he/she did not get the fruit and requested fruit from a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete, accurate, and systemically organized within accepted professional standards of practice for two Residents (#77 and # 67), out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #77, the documentation on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was accurate and completed on the date specified; and 2. For Resident #67, the Decree and Order of Appointment of Guardian for an Incapacitated Person was included as part of the medical record, readily accessible, and confirmed the guardian's authority to sign the Resident's Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form. Findings include: 1. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses that included acute osteomyelitis of the right foot and ankle and cancer of the larynx. Record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2022 indicated an entry for: -Fax Monday labs (laboratory results) to the Infectious Disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to define, implement, and maintain a comprehensive quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) plan to address the full range of care and services provided by the facility, including infection control practices, Quality of care, falls, and medication review. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, dated April 2015, indicated the facility's QAPI program is a proactive approach to improving the quality of life, care, and services in the nursing home. The Governing Body should foster a culture where QAPI is a priority by ensuring that policies are developed to sustain QAPI despite personnel changes and staff turnover. Their responsibilities include, setting expectations around safety, quality, rights, choice, and respect by balancing safety with resident-centered rights and choice. The governing body must implement and maintain an ongoing QAPI Committee designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care/services, pursue methods to improve quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a functional, safe, and clean environment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or staff properly dispose of cigarette butts in designated smoking receptacles. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) circular letter, dated November 10, 2011, titled Smoking Safety in Long Term Care Facilities indicated but was not limited to the following: -The Life Safety Code (NFPA 101, 2000 ed., 19.7.4) requires each smoking area be provided with ashtrays made of noncombustible material and safe design. -Metal containers with self-closing covers into which ashtrays can be emptied must be readily available. Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking, dated as revised 11/2020, indicated but was not limited to: -It is the policy of the facility to provide a healthy and safe environment for residents, staff and visitors by limiting the use of tobacco smoking materials on its campus -Purpose: to afford residents the privilege of smoking while maintaining a safe and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA R LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/25/2012 |
| CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 09/25/2012 |
| CURTIS, DIANE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/25/2012 |
| MOSIER, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 6% | since 09/25/2012 |
| REZENDES, LORRIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/25/2012 |
| SANTILLI, LAWRENCE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 74% | since 05/04/2020 |
| ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/25/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225337. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.