Southshore Health Care Center
115 North Avenue, Rockland, MA 02370 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (781) 848-3100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,395 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-19)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 26.1% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.3% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.7% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.3% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.2% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.5% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.2% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.0% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.17 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.12 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 60% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.4%CMS range 32.6–58.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.7–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 2.6–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #3 and Resident #1) who were assessed by nursing to be at risk for skin breakdown and were assessed to have pressure injuries, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff adequately assessed, obtained physician's orders for and provided wound care treatments in accordance with professional standards of practice in an effort to promote wound healing, as result there was a delay in treatment for both residents, and Resident #3's pressure injury which was facility acquired, was noted to have worsened. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Prevention and Management of Pressure Injuries, dated 07/2017, indicated residents with pressure injuries and those at risk for skin breakdown are identified, assessed, and provided appropriate treatment to encourage healing and/or maintenance of skin integrity. The Policy further indicated the following; -A head to toe skin assessment is to be performed upon admission and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, for three of four sampled residents (Residents #1, #3 and #4), who had court appointed legal representatives or health care agents, the Facility failed to ensure it honored requests for copies of medical record information within two working days, when their representatives requested copies of documentation from their medical records verbally and/or through email correspondence, but were not provided with copies in accordance with federal regulations.Findings include: Review of the Facility Medical Record Policy and Procedure, dated January 2020, indicated it was the policy of the Facility to honor a resident's right of access to inspect and obtain a copy of their protected health information.Resident #1's clinical record indicated he/she was admitted to the Facility during July 2023 and his/her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder.Resident #1's clinical record contained documentation which indicated the court appointed him/her a legal Guardian in April…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed, for two of four sampled residents (Residents #1 and #3) whose diagnoses included psychiatric disorders, the Facility failed to ensure they received and were provided appropriate Behavioral Health services that addressed and met their mental health needs.Findings include: The Facility Behavioral Management Guidelines Policy, dated April 2015, indicated it was the policy of the Facility to develop behavior plans and medication regimes, when appropriate, to optimize the functional abilities of residents.The Facility Assessment, dated as most recently updated 3/23/26, indicated the resident population served by the Facility included residents with psychiatric/mood disorders. The Assessment indicated the services provided by the Facility to address resident needs included consultant psychiatric services.The Behavioral Health Services Agreement between the Facility and the Psychiatric Service Agency, dated 9/21/23, indicated the Agency provided psychotherapeutic services to residents of the Facility.Resident #1's clinical record indicated he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed, for two of three sampled residents (Residents #1 and #3) the facility failed to ensure it protected and facilitated the resident's right to communicate with individuals and entities external to the facility, when staff failed to answer the Facility telephone on multiple days, leaving the telephone to ring and ring unanswered. Findings include: Resident #1's clinical record indicated he/she was admitted to the Facility during July 2023 and his/her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder. Resident #1's clinical record contained documentation which indicated the court had appointed him/her a legal Guardian in April 2023.Review of Resident #1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/26, indicated Resident #1's cognitive patterns were intact.During a telephone interview on 4/13/26 at 10:09 A.M., Resident #1's Guardian said that on multiple dates, when she called the Facility, the phone often rang and rang and went unanswered. The Guardian said that although Resident #1 had a telephone in his/her room, if he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #4), the Facility failed to ensure they reported an injury of unknown origin to the State Survey agency. On 03/11/26, Resident #4 was observed with an injury of unknown origin and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation, however the injury was not reported to their State Agency as required.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 2023, indicated the Facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property and establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations.The Policy indicated reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within a specific time frame:-Immediately, but no later than two (2) hours after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #4), who on 03/12/26 was found with an injury of unknown origin (bump on Resident #4's forehead), the Facility failed to ensure they conducted and maintained evidence of an investigation into the injury.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Accidents/Incidents, dated 04/2015, indicated that it is the responsibility of the staff to report all accidents and incidents which occur at the Facility.The Policy indicated that all accidents and incidents must be reported to the supervisor and appropriate documentation must be completed and every attempt will be made to ascertain the cause of the occurrence.Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 2023, indicated that an immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur. The Policy indicated that an alleged violation is a situation or occurrence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physicians orders included the administration of a controlled substance medication, the facility failed to ensure that medication was properly secured and under direct supervision of nursing staff, when on 01/06/26 after administering him/her the medication, Nurse #1 left the blister pack card containing oxycodone (narcotic medication) unattended in Resident #1's room.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility-ID1: Storage of Medications, undated, indicated that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly.Review of the Facility's Policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility-ID2: Controlled Substance Storage, undated, indicated the following:-medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and record keeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that it maintained an effective pest control program that provided an environment that was free of pests and rodents for the 79 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen on 8/21/2025 at 7:56 A.M., the surveyor observed the main kitchen dry food storage area and made the following observations: -On the left side of the room there were multiple shelves of canned goods with a large amount of mouse droppings on top of the cans. During an interview on 8/21/25 at 8:20 A.M., the Food Service Director (FSD) inspected the dry storage area with the surveyor and said the cans of food with rust along the ends and mouse droppings were the emergency food supply. He said they have had a mouse problem for a while. During an interview with observation on 8/21/25 at 9:00 A.M., Resident #88 said there were mice in their room. The surveyor observed a grocery store paper bag with a loaf of bread, an open box of snacks and an unopen box of snacks, none of the items were in plastic containers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, a resident group meeting, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances brought forward from the Resident Council were addressed and promptly resolved to ensure the residents felt their concerns were acted upon. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 4/8/25, indicated but was not limited to:-Two residents on the west unit indicated they were missing clothes Further review of the Resident Council Minutes and corresponding documents, dated 4/8/25, failed to indicate the concern had been addressed and responded to by the facility. On 8/25/25 at 4:26 P.M., the Activities Director reviewed the Resident Council Minutes and corresponding documentation. The Activities Director said there should be a response from the Laundry/Housekeeping Department head but there was not. Review of the Resident Council and Food Committee Minutes, dated 5/21/25, indicated but was not limited to:-Multiple residents from both units stated that the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) spoke to the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician and/or responsible party was notified of changes in a resident's condition for two Residents (#83, #8), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #83, that the physician was notified of a change in mental status, verbalizations of wanting to leave the facility and exit seeking behavior; and2. For Resident #8, to inform the attending physician of a significant weight loss. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Condition: Significant Change; dated 4/2015; indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -The physician, resident/patient, and/or responsible party will be notified by the nurse in the event of a change in condition -This notification shall be documented in the clinical record 1. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 and had diagnoses including alcohol dependence with withdrawal and major depressive disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/25, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for five Residents (#72, #57, #31, #1, #5), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #72, to implement physician's orders to apply palm rip/palm roll to the Resident's left hand; 2. For Resident #57, to implement physician's orders to apply his/her glasses and left upper extremity splint;3. For Resident #31, to implement physician's order for laboratory blood work;4. For Resident #1,a. to reconcile and implement physician's order for enteral tube feeding, andb. to reconcile and implement physician's order for oxygen use; and5. For Resident #5,a. to implement the physician's order for oxygen use, and b. to implement the physician's orders for wound treatments. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11ed, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide two Residents (#15, #83), out of a total sample of 20 residents, with adequate supervision and effective interventions to prevent avoidable accidents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #15, to develop and consistently implement effective interventions to prevent recurrent falls; and2. For Resident #83, to provide adequate level of staff supervision to maintain his/her safety in an effort to prevent an elopement from the facility.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Accidents/Incidents, dated 4/2015, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -It is the responsibility of staff to report all accidents and incidents which occur at the facility. -Occurrences of a serious nature requires notification to the Administrator and Director of Nurses. Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 11/2017, indicated, but was not limited to, the follow: -The facility is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the results of 2 of 2 test trays (one breakfast and one lunch meal) and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with meals and drinks that were palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Findings include: During the Resident Council Meeting, held with the surveyor on 8/25/25 at 1:30 P.M. with 12 residents in attendance, the residents complained about the food as follows:-8 of 12 residents said the food is not good, it's repetitive, and desserts are served frozen. During interviews on 8/21/25 at 9:05 A.M., four residents (#30, #81, #27, and #13) on the [NAME] Unit complained that they disliked the meals they are served. Review of Food Committee Minutes, dated 5/21/25, indicated residents complained that the temperature of the food was so-so. The Food Service Director (FSD) indicated that dining services does at least two test trays a month and will do one every week as a follow-up.Review of Test Tray Evaluations provided by the FSD, indicated test trays were conducted with inadequate food temperatures as follows:-6/3/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure the main kitchen dry food storage was maintained in a sanitary condition; 2. Follow proper sanitation and food handling practices while thawing chicken to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness; and3. Ensure the tile flooring in the main kitchen was maintained in a sanitary and safe condition.Findings include:1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated, but was not limited to: -6-501.111 Controlling Pests. Insects and other pests are capable of transmitting disease to humans by contaminating food and food-contact surfaces. Effective measures must be taken to eliminate their presence in food establishments.-6-501.111 Controlling Pests. The PREMISES shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and records reviewed, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), specifically Isolation Precautions, were implemented as indicated for residents positive for COVID-19;2. Maintain and implement a Water Management Program to mitigate the risks of Legionella;3. Ensure the infection surveillance line lists were complete and accurate;4. Ensure medications were handled in a sanitary manner during administration for one out of two nurses observed; and5. Ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used properly by staff while caring for Resident #1 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the potential spread of infection. Findings include:1. Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 New Facility Outbreak for Massachusetts (MA), dated 6/24/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 20 residents, had their call light accessible and within reach in order to utilize to call for assistance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Call Light, Use of, dated April 2015, indicated but was not limited to the following:- All [Corporate Name] Health Care Systems resident/patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within his/her reach when unattended.- When providing care to the residents/patients be sure to position the call light conveniently, telling/showing the resident/patient where the call light is located. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility and heart failure. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/5/25, indicated he/she was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. On 8/22/25 at 10:41 A.M., the surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when one Resident (#51), was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation, in a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure facility staff who were aware of the incident reported the altercation to leadership to allow for reporting, investigating, and implementing measures to prevent potential future altercations. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as reviewed 2/2023, indicated but was not limited to:1.Verbal abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability.2. The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations.3. The facility will provide ongoing oversight and supervision of staff to assure that its…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, for one Resident (#51), of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported timely to the state agency as required. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as reviewed 2/2023, indicated but was not limited to:-Verbal abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability- The facility will have written procedures that include reporting of all alleged violations to the administrator, state agency, adult Protective Services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes (Immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, for one Resident (#51), of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, for Resident #51, the facility failed to ensure a resident-to-resident verbal altercation was investigated. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as reviewed 2/2023, indicated but was not limited to:1. Verbal abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability.2. The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations.3. The facility will provide ongoing oversight and supervision of staff to assure that its policies are implemented.4. The facility will have written procedures to assist staff in identifying the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and individualize comprehensive care plans for three Residents (#83, #51, and #5), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #83, to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for a change in mental status including delusions and hallucinations and elopement risk;2. For Resident #51, to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address his/her history of thoughts to self-harm; and3. For Resident #5, to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address his/her oxygen therapy usage. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, last revised November 2017, indicated but was not limited to: -This facility is committed to providing residents with all necessary care and services to enable them to achieve the highest quality of life. Recognizing each resident as an individual, we identify and meet those needs in a resident-centered environment. Care plans are oriented toward preventing avoidable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide indwelling catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside of the body) care and management consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Foley catheter was assessed for removal as soon as possible or determine a clinical condition related to the Foley catheter placement on admission to the facility. Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including heart failure, muscle weakness, and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/4/25, indicated he/she was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. Furthermore, the MDS assessment indicated he/she had an indwelling catheter and no genitourinary diagnoses. During an observation with an interview on 8/21/25 at 2:08 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #5 in bed with a Foley catheter hanging from the side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's inhaler, topical gel, and allergy nasal spray medications were stored securely. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated February 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following:- The facility provides pharmaceutical services that are conducted in accordance with accepted ethical and professional standards of practice and that meet applicable Federal, State and Local Laws, rules and regulations.- Medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, muscle weakness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests.Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code (a model for safeguarding public health and ensuring food is unadulterated and honestly presented when offered to the consumer) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated outside receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. Proper equipment and supplies must be made available to accomplish thorough and proper cleaning of garbage storage areas and receptacles so that unsanitary conditions can be eliminated.On 8/26/25 at 11:33 A.M., the surveyor observed two dumpsters with the top lids closed, however, the dumpster on the left's cover was bent and not tight fitting exposing the garbage to potential harborage and feeding of pests. The surrounding area had a buildup of trash and debris including but not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was alert and oriented, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 2/24/25, after being found a second time with a vape pen (electronic cigarette is a handheld device consisting of a battery attached to a cartridge filled with a liquid solution that is vaporized and simulates tobacco or marijuana smoking) in his/her possession, the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) asked Resident #1 to come to her office, accompanied by two other staff members for a skin check, during which Resident #1 was instructed to and removed his/her upper body clothing items, as part of a strip search. Findings include: Review of the Facility Notice of Resident Rights Policy, most recently revised 1/01, indicated the Facility must promote and protect the rights of residents. Review of the Facility Room Entry and Search Policy, dated April 2016, indicated the Facility may enter and search a resident room if there is reason to believe that an illegal activity or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an activated Health Care Proxy with his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) making his/her medical decisions, and had requested a change in attending Physician's for him/her in early October 2024, the Facility failed ensure they honored the residents right to change attending physicians in a timely manner, when the requested was not facilitated until two months later. Findings include: Review of the Commonewealth of Massachusetts Notice of Nursing Facility Resident's Rights, dated as last revised 01/2001, indicated that when one enters a nursing facility, you do not lose your rights as an individual and the nursing home must protect and promote your rights and the rights of each resident. - The Notice also indicated that all residents have the right to choose a personal physician. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in July 2023, diagnoses include metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance), schizoaffective disorder, seizure disorder, a history of urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations, for two of two sampled nursing units (Unit #1 and Unit #2), the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff properly secured all medications (prescription and over the counter), when on 12/09/24, the [NAME] Units' medication room door was observed to be open and unlocked, and the East Units' medication room door was found to be unlocked, therefore leaving medications unsecured. Findings include: Review of the facility Policy titled, Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart, dated 02/2018, indicated that the facility provides pharmaceutical services that are conducted in accordance with accepted ethical and professional standards of practice and that meet Federal, State, and Local Laws, rules and regulations. The Policy further indicated that medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart, however storage for other medications will be limited to a locked medication room. During an observation on 12/09/24 at 11:56 A.M., the Surveyor observed the medication room door on Unit #1 was open, unlocked and access to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, #2 and #3), the Facility failed to ensure nursing provided care and services that met professional standards of practice, when upon admission to the Facility, their medications and/or treatments were not accurately reconciled, and as result not all medications and/or treatments were administered in accordance with what was indicated on the Hospital Discharge Summary, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with facility policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Medication Reconciliation, dated as last revised 08/04/22, indicated that medication reconciliation involves collaboration with the resident/representative and multiple disciplines, including admissions liaisons, licensed nurses, physicians, and pharmacy staff. The policy indicated the following steps are part of the pre-admission process; -Obtain current medication list from the referral source (i.e. hospital, home health, hospice, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program, as evidenced by sanitation concerns, mice sightings, and mice droppings on two of two units and the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the Pest Control Program Description indicated the following: -Depending on specific pest concerns there will be variation in control methods used. Methods used will consider the following options in the order listed: -inspection- technicians will inspect relevant areas -sanitation- these needs will always be communicated to you. Issues may seem small but select pests do not need much to survive. Review of the Resident Council minutes indicated the following: March 2024: Residents still complain they see mice in their rooms and living room. Residents complain the mice are a big issue and residents can hear the mice in the ceiling. Review of the response indicated the pest company was in on 3/25/24 and residents need to keep their food in plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a resident group meeting, staff interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances and concerns from the Resident Council were documented to ensure they were acted upon timely and included the facility response and rationale for response. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Resident Council, dated 10/15, indicated but was not limited to: -Notify department heads in writing of concerns that come up during the meeting. -Retain a copy of the resolutions that address each concern. During the Resident Group meeting held on 6/24/24 at 11:00 A.M., the Resident Council President said that every month the same concerns are brought up again and again with no resolution. In addition, multiple residents said they voice their concerns month after month with no improvement in the issues they bring up. Review of Resident Council minutes from March 2024 indicated but was not limited to the following concerns brought up by residents: -The noise level of staff in hallway is too loud on the 3-11 shift on the [NAME] unit. -Medication room is not stocked.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for the residents at the facility, for 2 of 2 nursing units, and throughout areas of the facility used by residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Preventative Maintenance and Testing, last reviewed 5/05, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility provides a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, personnel, and public. -Daily Building inspection includes but is not limited to inspection of hallways and exit access corridors and stairwells and ensure they remain free and unobstructed of debris; no storage should be permitted in these areas. -Inspect corridor, lobby, and public areas for obvious defects, i.e. loose handrails, peeling paint/wall covering, broken/missing ceiling assembly and floor tiles, etc. East Unit: On 6/21/24 at 8:00 A.M., and on all days of the survey, the surveyor smelled a foul, musty odor throughout the East Unit. The surveyor observed the green carpets on the East unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided, according to facility protocols and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#50), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure preventative skin care treatments were implemented, wound care treatments were implemented when a break in the skin was discovered, non-pressure ulcer evaluations were completed weekly and weekly skin checks were completed, and to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented for a non-pressure wound, resulting in worsening of a non-pressure ulcer on the left heel from a split with slight darkness to unstable eschar (type of necrotic (dead) tissue that can develop on severe wounds. Typically dry, black, firm and usually attached to wound bed). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Skin and Wounds, dated as last revised March 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: Pressure Injury/Non-Pressure Wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to minimize the risk of falls for one Resident (#33), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff accurately assessed the Resident's risk for falls, falls were thoroughly investigated, and interventions were developed and implemented to mitigate the risk of future falls resulting in six falls in five months, one of which resulted in two skin tears and a left hip fracture. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls Management, dated as last revised April 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -A fall risk evaluation will be conducted on each resident upon admission, with the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) cycle, and when a significant change in status occurs (including a fall). -The Interdisciplinary team (IDT) will develop, initiate, and implement an appropriate individualized care plan based on the Fall Risk Evaluation Score. A score of 0-9 indicated no risk to low risk, while a score of 10+…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented dialysis care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#50 and #15), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #50, to assess and monitor a left Arteriovenous (AV) fistula (a surgically connected artery and vein used for long term dialysis) site, to assess and monitor for adverse reactions/complications, to provide ongoing communication between the nursing facility and dialysis facility, to consistently document assessments of the Resident's condition, to obtain weights for physician evaluation, and to develop a comprehensive care plan for dialysis; and 2. For Resident #15, to provide ongoing communication between the nursing facility and dialysis facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hemodialysis, dated April 2015, indicated but was not limited to the following: -To provide comprehensive care to residents/patients that receive hemodialysis treatments. -Obtain physician orders for dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication without adequate monitoring for two Residents (#1 and #25), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to ensure the May 2024 Pharmacy Nursing Recommendation was acted upon in a timely manner to prevent Resident #1 was not receiving a weekly double dose of Alendronate (Fosamax-slows bone loss and prevents fractures in osteoporosis) 70 milligrams for five weeks; and 2. For Resident #25, to monitor for signs/symptoms of adverse consequences (i.e., side effects) of a prescribed anticoagulant agent (blood thinner). Findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses which included age related osteoporosis (a condition that weakens bones and increases the risk of fractures). Review of the Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations to Nursing, dated 5/27/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Resident #1: Resident has duplicate orders for Alendronate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen dry food storage was maintained in a sanitary condition. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated, but was not limited to: -6-501.111 Controlling Pests. Insects and other pests are capable of transmitting disease to humans by contaminating food and food-contact surfaces. Effective measures must be taken to eliminate their presence in food establishments. -6-501.111 Controlling Pests. The PREMISES shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the PREMISES by: -(B) Routinely inspecting the PREMISES for evidence of pests -(D) Eliminating harborage conditions. On 6/21/24 at 8:30 A.M., the surveyor observed the main kitchen dry food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer the Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and/or document refusal in the medical record and facility policy for three Residents (#33, #50, #55), out of a total sample of five residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #33, to document refusal of the influenza vaccine in the electronic medical record; 2. For Resident #50, to administer the pneumococcal vaccine after consent had been obtained (4/22/24); and 3. For Resident #55, to administer the pneumococcal vaccine after consent had been obtained (10/22/21). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Vaccine, dated as last revised 3/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -All eligible residents will be offered the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines unless medically contraindicated. The resident or the resident's legal representative will be provided education regarding the pros and cons of the vaccine prior to administration. -If the vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess, educate, and administer the COVID-19 vaccine and/or booster in a timely manner and/or to document refusal in the medical record for four Residents (#33, #79, #76, and #50), out of five residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #33, to educate, offer, and administer the COVID-19 vaccine, and document in the medical record consent/refusal; 2. For Resident #79, to administer the COVID-19 vaccine after consent had been obtained (5/1/24); 3. For Resident #76, to educate, offer, and administer the COVID-19 vaccine, and document in the medical record consent/refusal; and 4. For Resident #50, to document refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine in the electronic medical record. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Vaccine, dated as last revised 3/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from COVID-19 by offering our residents immunization to COVID-19.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the rights of one Resident (#26) to leave the facility, in a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility restricted Resident #26, who was their own responsible person, from leaving the facility with persons of their choice based on a history of substance use disorder. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Leave of Absence, dated December 2015, indicated the following: -Nursing staff will obtain an order for leave of absence with responsible party for a resident/patient on admission. Responsible party may include self if the resident is his/her own responsible party -If a resident is their own responsible party, they may go on a leave of absence unattended Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in April 2019 with a history of substance use disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/24, indicated Resident #26 scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Representative was fully informed in advance and given information necessary to make health care decisions to the extent required by the court for one Resident (#71), from a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder). Review of the medical record indicated Resident #71 had been declared an incapacitated person and had a guardian appointed by the court in April 2023. The guardianship protects the rights of the person that is unable to make or communicate decisions about everyday health, care, and safety. The guardian is responsible for and must be consulted for all healthcare decisions and required consents. An alternative guardian was not assigned. During an interview on 6/27/24 at 2:18 P.M., the Resident Representative, who is the legal guardian, said she was upset the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#72), out of a sample of 19 residents that the Resident had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he/she preferred. Specifically, the facility failed to inform the Resident of a toxicology screen (laboratory testing for substance use) being obtained. Findings include: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses that included hypertension and chronic diastolic heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/6/24, indicated Resident #72 scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #72 continued to be his/her own responsible party. During an interview on 6/25/24 at 3:02 P.M., Resident #72 said he/she was never made aware that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#72), out of a total sample of 19 residents, was treated with dignity and respect. Specifically, the facility failed to treat the Resident's belongings with respect during a room search. Findings include: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses that included hypertension and chronic diastolic heart failure. Further review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/6/24, indicated Resident #72 scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #72 continued to be his/her own responsible party. During an interview on 6/25/24 at 3:02 P.M., Resident #72 said that on two occasions staff had searched their room without any rationale or reason and without his/her consent. The Resident said he/she did not have a history of substance use disorder. Resident #72 said he/she thought the staff only searched rooms of people who had a history of substance use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for potential misappropriation of resident property for one Resident (#15), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of a stolen wallet for Resident #15. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, undated, indicated the following: -if the grievance involves an allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, exploitation or injuries of unknown source, the incident or allegation shall be investigated and reported pursuant to the facility policy on Abuse Prohibition. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated September 2020, indicated but was limited to the following: -Misappropriation of Resident Property: is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. -An alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure potential misappropriation was reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) no later than 24 hours in accordance with federal guidelines, for one Resident (#15), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report an allegation of a stolen wallet for Resident #15. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, undated, indicated the following: -if the grievance involves an allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, exploitation or injuries of unknown source, the incident or allegation shall be investigated and reported pursuant to the facility policy on Abuse Prohibition. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated September 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Misappropriation of Resident Property: is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. -An alleged violation involving abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to investigate potential misappropriation of resident property for one Resident (#15), out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of a stolen wallet for Resident #15. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, undated, indicated the following: -if the grievance involves an allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, exploitation or injuries of unknown source, the incident or allegation shall be investigated and reported pursuant to the facility policy on Abuse Prohibition. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated September 2020, indicated but was limited to the following: -Misappropriation of Resident Property: is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. -The incidents require an incident report, supervisory follow-up and a comprehensive internal facility investigation which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed to reflect the status for one Resident (#50), in a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS accurately reflected that the Resident had been receiving dialysis treatments. Findings include: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dependent on renal dialysis. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #50 had dialysis three times weekly. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 5/7/24, failed to indicate Resident #50 received dialysis treatments. During an interview on 6/27/24 at 9:30 A.M., the MDS Nurse said she was unsure why she did not code the dialysis on the MDS as Resident #50 does in fact go out for dialysis and it should have been coded on the MDS. It was an error and a modification needed to be done.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendation to obtain an A1c (blood test that measures an average blood sugar level over a period of two to three months) made by the pharmacy consultant was addressed timely and maintained as part of the permanent medical record for one Resident (#8), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Pharmacist Reports, revised December 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record at least monthly. The medication regimen review (MRR) includes evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practicable level of functioning and preventing or minimizing adverse consequences related to medication therapy. All findings and recommendations are reported to the Director of Nursing and the attending physician, the medical director and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an activated Health Care Proxy (HCP) due to confusion and an inability to make his/her own health care decisions, the Facility failed to ensure that his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) was fully informed in advance and given information including the risk and benefits of psychotropic medications prior to their use, when Resident#1 was administered antipsychotic medication for approximately two months by nursing, before obtaining his/her HCA's consent to administer the medication. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Management, dated 04/2015, indicated that the nursing staff would notify the resident or his/her responsible party of the initiation if psychoactive medications and obtain and document informed consent for the initiation of antipsychotic medication. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in November 2023, diagnoses included dementia, anemia, septicemia (an infection in the blood), metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure grievances were addressed in a timely manner for four Residents (#50, #78, #75, and #45), out of a total sample of 20 residents, and 2. Ensure grievance forms were available in resident care and public areas so residents and/or visitors were able to access forms without requesting staff assistance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Residents have the right to voice grievance without discrimination or reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances may include issues with care of treatment that has been received or not received, the behavior of staff or other residents and other concerns regarding the resident's stay at the facility. - The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve any grievance in accordance with this policy. - The facility will appoint a grievance officer who will be responsible for overseeing the grievance process. - The right to file grievance orally or in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-02 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee which included the required members at their meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Performance Improvement, dated 4/2015, indicated but was not limited to: - The Administrator or Staff Development Coordinator shall act as Chairperson for the Quality Improvement Committee and shall be responsible for assuring the minutes are recorded for all meetings. - The full Quality Improvement Committee which included the Medical Director, shall meet at least quarterly. - The Quality Improvement Committee Membership includes: - Administrator - Medical Director - All department heads - Director of Nursing - Assistant Director of Nursing - Staff Development Coordinator - Infection Control Nurse - QI Coordinator - Staff Representative - Social Service - Dietary On 3/1/23, the surveyor reviewed the sign-in sheets provided by the Administrator which indicated: - The attendance sheet for the QAPI meeting held on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a functional, safe, and clean environment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Monitor the smoking sessions to ensure cigarettes were being extinguished and disposed of in a safe manner in the smoking area, and 2. Provide ongoing monitoring of water temperature and pressure to ensure residents could comfortably complete their personal care needs. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking, dated June 2018, included but was not limited to: -It is the policy of the facility to provide a healthy and safe environment for residents, staff and visitors by limiting the use of tobacco smoking materials on its campus. -To afford residents the privilege of smoking while maintaining a safe and clean environment within the policy of this facility, that also is respectful to the non-smoker. On 2/22/23 at 11:10 A.M., the surveyor toured the designated smoking area and observed multiple cigarette butts on the ground mixed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and documentation review, the facility failed to ensure concerns identified in the Resident Group meeting were resolved effectively related to call light response, staff using cellular devices during care, limited availability of the day rooms for resident use, access to the social worker, and the need for the facility to provide ice to residents instead of buying ice themselves. Findings include: On 2/24/23 at 11:00 A.M., the surveyor held a Resident Group Meeting with 17 residents in attendance, representing both resident care units. The Residents said, and all agreed, although the group brought forward concerns, the concerns were not heard, and issues fell on deaf ears. The Residents said the resolutions were not effective and the group had presented the same issues month after month which included: - call light response time continued to be an issue, - staff continued to use cellular devices/earbuds while care was provided, - Residents had limited availability of the use of the day rooms on both units, - Residents wanted more accessibility to the social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents residing on two of two units. Specifically, the survey team observed: environmental cleanliness concerns in resident rooms which included dirty wall surfaces, wall surfaces in disrepair, broken blinds, missing tiles, dirty vents, and floors in need of washing. Findings include: East Unit: On 2/22/23 at 9:30 A.M., the surveyor observed: -Shower rooms: black staining in the grout between the floor tiles, cracked tiles on the wall, brown debris on the wall between the grout, rust noted on the floor tiles, on the vent, and on the handheld shower head. -East Unit Linen closet: missing left door/panel. On 2/22/23 at 12:17 P.M., the surveyor observed: room [ROOM NUMBER]: -Bathroom doors with chipped wood and scratches/scrapes present. -The doorframes had chipped and missing paint. -Multiple missing tiles around the toilet with built up dirt and debris where the tiles should have been. -Built up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement the weight policy to ensure weights were obtained monthly to monitor for changes for one Resident (#29), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights, dated August 2015, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The following residents are weighed weekly x 4: - Newly admitted residents - Newly readmitted residents - Residents with an unanticipated, unplanned weight loss of >5% in one month - Residents with a physician order for weekly weights - Thereafter, residents will be weighed monthly, unless clinically indicated - If a significant weight loss/gain is identified (>5% in 30 days or >10% in 6 months) the Interdisciplinary team, dietician, physician, and family are notified Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, infection following a surgical procedure, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of Resident #29's Interdisciplinary Care Plans indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0917 — patternMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure functional furniture, which included chairs for the comfort of residents, was provided for two of two units. Findings include: On 2/27/23 at 11:17 A.M., the surveyor observed the East Unit Day Room with three tables and only one chair. On 3/1/23 at 8:47 A.M., the surveyor observed the East Unit Day Room with three tables and only one chair. On 3/1/23 at 8:50 A.M., the surveyor made the following observations on the East Unit: -room [ROOM NUMBER]: occupied by two residents and contained one rocking chair -room [ROOM NUMBER]: occupied by one resident and contained zero chairs -room [ROOM NUMBER]: occupied by four residents and contained one chair -room [ROOM NUMBER]: occupied by two residents and contained zero chairs -room [ROOM NUMBER]: occupied by two residents and contained one chair -room [ROOM NUMBER]: occupied by one resident and contained zero chairs -room [ROOM NUMBER]: occupied by two residents and contained zero chairs On 3/1/23 at 11:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Representative was fully informed in advance and given information necessary to make health care decisions to the extent required by the court for one Resident (#11), from a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent - Massachusetts Only, dated February 2016, indicated but was not limited to: -Prior to administering psychotropic medication, the facility shall obtain the informed written consent of the resident, the resident's health care proxy, or the resident's guardian. -The written consent form shall be kept in the resident's medical record. -Documentation of informed consent for prescribing psychotropic medication including but not limited to, drugs that treat depression, anxiety disorders, or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. Review of the most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality for two sampled Residents (#30 and #11), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #30, to ensure medications were consumed after being administered, and 2. For Resident #11, to follow consultant recommendations to obtain a blood level of Lithium (a mood stabilizer used to treat bipolar disorder, with a narrow range of safety). Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration - Oral, dated June 2015, indicated but was not limited to: -Stay with the resident/patient until he/she has swallowed the medication. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in July 2019 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarct (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and ataxic gait (unsteady gait). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/30/22, indicated Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. ensure the janitorial closet was securely locked, and hazardous items were not easily accessible to all residents, and 2. for two Residents (#3 and #25), out of a total sample of 20 residents, ensure smoking assessments were completed to determine resident capabilities and deficits to determine whether or not supervision was required. Findings include: 1. On 3/2/23 at 1:30 P.M., the surveyor observed that the janitorial closet door on the East Unit was not fully closed and could easily be pushed open by the surveyor. The following items were observed: - One pair of scissors - One opened container of MicroKill One Germicidal Alcohol Wipes - One quart bottle of Medline Heavy Duty Toilet Bowl Cleaner - One quart bottle of Tile and Grout Rejuvenator - One gallon bottle of Medline MicroKill Q10 Disinfectant Cleaner - 5 gallon bucket of 60 Seconds Floor Finish Stripper and Heavy Duty Degreaser On all days of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure targeted behaviors and signs and symptoms of side effects were adequately monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of psychotropic medication to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for three Residents (#49, #70, and #11), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Management, dated 4/15, indicated but was not limited to: -Psychoactive medication management will include implementation of behavioral interventions, gradual dose reduction attempts, and adequate monitoring that complies with Federal and State guidelines. -Monitor target behaviors daily for Antipsychotics, Antidepressants and Anxiolytics using a behavior monitoring tool. Sedative/Hypnotic medications do not require targeted behavior monitoring if appropriate diagnosis is in place. -Monitor the resident's response to the medication and for any potential adverse consequences of the medication. A.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in one out of one resident unit nourishment kitchens. Findings include: On 2/22/23 at 9:15 A.M., the surveyor observed the residents' microwave oven, located in the kitchenette, to be visibly stained on the interior bottom, and top and back walls. The turn table was dirty with visible dried, food-like particles. The inside top was heavily rusted with the surface area noted to be bubbling/cracking/flaking with the white paint lifting off the surface. During an interview on 2/22/23 at 9:18 A.M., [NAME] #1 said the kitchenette microwave was used by residents to heat food. During an interview on 2/22/23 at 10:19 A.M., the Administrator and Regional Director of Operations was made aware of the surveyor's observation and the Regional Director of Operations said it needed to be replaced.
- No harm found · B2025-08-27 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to encode and transmit discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two Residents (#33 and #71), out of two MDS assessments reviewed. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #33, on 8/21/25, indicated but was not limited to the following:- the Resident was discharged to another facility on 3/25/25- an MDS had not been completed since for the Resident's discharge and was 133 days overdue Review of the medical record for Resident #71, on 8/21/25, indicated but was not limited to the following:- the Resident was discharged home on 3/26/25- an MDS had not been completed since for the Resident's discharge and was 134 days overdue During an interview on 8/22/25 at 7:32 A.M., the MDS Nurse reviewed the medical record of both Resident #33 and #71 and said the MDSs should have been completed within seven days and transmitted within 14 days following the discharges and that she must have just missed these two.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-03-02 · tag F0641 — widespreadEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the Resident's status for six Residents (#35, #59, #12, #29, #7, and #88), out of 20 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Residents #35, #59, #12, #29, and #7, to accurately reflect the Resident's cognition, and 2. For Resident #88, to accurately code the Resident as a discharge to the community. Findings include: 1A. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in December 2021 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructed pulmonary disease, heart failure, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/15/23, indicated the Resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), assessed in section C, was coded as not assessed. B. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses which included hypertension, arthritis, asthma, and dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated of 1/4/23, indicated the Resident's BIMS, assessed in section C, was coded as not assessed. C.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,395 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $26,395 — penalty dated 2024-03-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2010 |
| MOSIER, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 5% | since 12/01/2010 |
| REZENDES, LORRIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/17/2015 |
| SANTILLI, LAWRENCE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 77% | since 10/07/2019 |
| ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/05/1993 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225215. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.