No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

1010 Varnum Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854 · For profit - Partnership · 123 certified beds · (978) 458-8773 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (978) 458-8773 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)3 actual-harm citations$85,178 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $85,178 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-29)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
595 Pawtucket Blvd · (978) 955-9500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
595 Pawtucket Blvd · (978) 459-8447 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Park
101 Trotting Park Rd · (978) 369-6312 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.4%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.5%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.9%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.7%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.9%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.6%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.7%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table40.9%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine25.0%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.3%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.251.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.221.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.1%CMS range 38.9–56.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.1–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.5–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
23.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 115.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.83 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.87 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#108 and #100) with pressure ulcers receive care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, 1. For Resident #108 the facility failed to: 1a. Implement recommendations from the consultant wound physician and, 1b. Ensure air mattress settings were set according to the plan of care. 2. For Resident #100 the facility failed to implement recommendations from the consultant wound physician. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Consultant Services, dated as April 2015, indicated the following: -Policy: [The facility] will identify and facilitate consultant services to meet the resident's needs, to ensure optimum care for each resident/ patient through consultant services. - Procedure: The charge nurse will then notify the attending physician of findings and he/she can then order the specific treatments as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services by a) ensuring recommendations from the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner were implemented and b) psychotropic medications were provided as ordered for one Resident (#80) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Management, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -Administer medications as directed by the physician and manufacturer. -Monitor target behaviors daily for antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics using behavior monitoring tool. -Review the care plan with IDT (interdisciplinary team) when a resident is admitted on psychoactive medications, quarterly, annually and as needed for changes in resident status and revise as necessary. -Review should include verification that adequate indications for use of the psychotropic medication exist, the medications are note being used for extended duration, and residents are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review , policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#71 and #73) were provided effective interventions and supervision to prevent falls, out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to 1) ensure for Resident #71 that effective interventions were in place to prevent further falls after sustaining multiple falls which then resulted in Resident #71 sustaining a hip fracture, and 2) ensure for Resident #73 was provided effective supervision and interventions to prevent a fall. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Falls Management last revised August 2018 indicated that a fall risk evaluation will be conducted after each fall and the interdisciplinary team will develop, initiate, and implement an appropriate individualized care plan based on the fall risk evaluation score. Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated last revised November 2017 indicated the care plan is revised as needed. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to provide each resident with an over the bed table on 1 out of 3 units. Specifically, the C unit had tray tables for only 19 of the 41 beds available on the floor. Findings include:On 8/12/25 at 7:35 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 said he has worked at the facility for several years and has noticed that in recent months the over the bed tables on the C unit have been taken to other units for use, leaving the residents on the C unit without enough tables. CNA #5 said the residents on the C unit are forced to share tables from room to room, creating a wait time for passing out meals, inability to leave activity materials within reach for residents, and eliminating a place for residents to keep personal items. CNA #5 said he has taken this concern to the Administrator for several months without a response. The surveyor observed all rooms on the C unit and observed that the unit only has 19 tray tables for 41 available beds. On 8/12/25 at 12:15 P.M., the surveyor observed a family member exiting a room to come to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for dependent residents for five Residents (#66, #47, #52, #12 and #79) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically:For Resident #66 the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care.For Residents #47, #52 and #12, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals as indicated in the Resident's plan of care.For Resident #79, the facility failed to ensure facial hair was being shaved.Findings include: 1 Review of facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living, dated April 2015 indicated the following: -A program of activities of daily living (ADL) is provided to residents to maintain or restore maximum functional independence. The ability for each resident to meet the demands of daily living is assessed by a licensed nurse and/or other members of the interdisciplinary team. A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is developed and implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the Registered Dietitian and Physician of a significant change in nutritional status for one Resident (#12) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Weights, undated, indicated the following:-If a significant weight loss gain is identified (> 5% in 30 days or > 10% in six months), the IDT (interdisciplinary team), dietitian, physician and family are notified.-All residents with a significant weight loss are reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and the resident/responsible party and interventions implemented as appropriate and are monitored weekly. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including dysphagia, diabetes, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of Resident #12's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she has severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#66) was free from neglect out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #66, the facility neglected to provide the necessary care for incontinence management. Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, dementia and aphasia. Review of Resident #66's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/11/25, indicated that the Resident could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam and was assessed by staff to be severely impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS further indicated that Resident #66 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and activities of daily living (ADLS). On 8/13/25 the surveyor observed Resident #66 continuously from 7:42 A.M. to 1:15 P.M. At 7:42 A.M., Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #1 brought Resident #66 into the dining room before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#52) was assessed for and free from restraints, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Restraint Management, dated August 2018, indicated the following: -It is the policy of the facility to utilize restraints only when clinically justifiable to treat the resident's medical condition while maintaining the resident's highest practicable level of physical and psychological wellbeing. Restraints will be utilized only after alternatives to restraints and/or least restrictive restraints have been attempted. The need for a restraint will be evaluated by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) and this recommendation will be reviewed with the residents and/or responsible party. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate the resident on admission, annually, quarterly and initiation of restraint with significant change of condition to determine the need for continued use of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for neglect by a staff member for one Resident (#66), out of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures related to the timely reporting of neglect and removal of the alleged perpetrator from the unit.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as implemented February 2023, indicated the following:-Neglect means failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.- Alleged Violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be an indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property.-VI.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement person centered care plans for two Residents (#52 and #45), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #52, a. to develop a care plan for the use of a scoop mattress,b. to implement a personalized care plan for the use of two staff during activities of daily living, andc. to implement a personalized care plan for the use of a pressure relieving device; and2. For Resident #45, to develop and implement an individualized behavioral care plan. Findings include: 1. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including dementia and repeated falls. Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/11/25, indicated Resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 out of a possible 15, which indicated the Resident has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #52 requires substantial assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for two Residents (#40, #10), out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #40, to ensure he/she received two tablets of Lactaid as ordered by the physician; and2. For Resident #10, to ensure a wander guard (a bracelet and monitor placed on a resident who is at risk for elopement, that is part of an alarm system to alert staff if a Resident is attempting to exit a unit or facility) was in place per the physician's order. Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications Policy, dated July 2015, indicated: Evaluate the resident's cognitive, physical and visual ability to self-administer medications, update the care plan for self-administration to include where the medications will be stored, documentation of self-administration and location of the drug administration. [NAME] the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for each medication being self-administered for daily compliance monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement an activity program of choice for one Resident (#12) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease. Review of Resident #12's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #12 requires supervision for self-feeding tasks and is dependent on staff for all other self-care and mobility tasks. During an interview on 8/1/2/25 at 8/12/25 8:13 A.M., Resident #12 said he/she does not get out of bed and does not participate in activities. The Resident's television was on and there were no activity materials observed in the Resident's room. On 8/12/25, Resident #12 was observed lying in bed with the television on throughout the 7:00 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#52) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the Resident's choices out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility did not provide a left-hand splint for Resident #27 to use for contracture management. Findings include:Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including dementia and left hand contracture. Review of Resident #52's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 out of a possible 15, which indicated the Resident has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #52 has an impairment in range of motion in the left hand and requires supervision for eating. On 8/12/25 at 9:10 A.M., Resident #52 was observed lying in bed. His/her morning care had not yet been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement fall interventions to potentially prevent falls for two Residents (#52 and #22) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including dementia and repeated falls. Review of Resident #52's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 out of a possible 15, which indicated the Resident has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #52 has an impairment in range of motion in the left hand and requires supervision for eating. Review of Resident #52's physician orders indicated the following orders: -bed alarm - check placement and function q (every) shift, every shift for preventative maintenance s/p (status post) fall, 3/13/24. -chair alarm - check placement and function q (every) shift, every shift for preventative maintenance s/p (status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards in the management and care for urinary catheter devices for one Resident (#81) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the urinary catheter drainage bag was not placed in direct contact with the floor. Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Urinary Catheter Care, dated April 2015, indicated the following:-Policy: Routine urinary catheter care will be provided by trained CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] as necessary, to keep the catheter insertion site clean in order to prevent infection and other complications. Resident #81 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses that included weakness and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #81's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/30/25, indicated that the Resident was unable to participate in a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam and was assessed by staff as being severely impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide nutritional intervention for one Resident (#12) with a significant weight loss out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Weights, undated, indicated the following:-A weight loss/gain of 3 pounds or more on a resident weighing 100 pounds or less and weight loss/gain of 5 pounds or more on a resident weighing 100 pounds or more requires a reweigh for verification. A reweigh is done on the same scale, with a licensed nurse present.-if a significant weight loss/gain is identified (> 5% in 30 days or > 10% in six months), the IDT (interdisciplinary team), dietitian, physician and family are notified.-All residents with a significant weight loss are reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and the resident/responsible party and interventions implemented as appropriate and are monitored weekly. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses that included dysphagia, diabetes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC: a flexible tube inserted through a vein in one's arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart, used to deliver medications intravenously [IV] ), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#131), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #131, the facility failed to obtain weekly measurements for the external length of Resident #131's PICC line to ensure the PICC line had not migrated (moved from the heart to another area, which could have a significant impact on treatment, or cause serious harm). Findings include: Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th Edition, dated 2021, included the following for documentation relative to PICC line migration and dressing changes: Use a sterile measuring tape or incremental markings on the catheter to measure the external length of the catheter from hub to skin entry to make sure that the catheter hasn't migrated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#11) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing assessments, including the assessment of the dialysis access site were performed when Resident #11 returned from dialysis treatments. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Hemodialysis', dated April 2015, indicated care of arteriovenous (AV) fistula (how patients are connected to a dialysis machine):-Assess AV fistula every shift for the following and document:a. pain.b. signs and symptoms of infection (drainage, swelling, tenderness).c. scab formation.d. color, motion, and sensitivity of access arm.e. palpate fistula for a thrill (vibration felt over fistula).f. auscultate fistula for a bruit (whooshing heard over fistula).-Documentation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#86) was seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission. Findings include:Resident #86 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses that included hallucinations and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #86's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/14/25, indicated that the Resident could not participate in a Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam and was assessed by staff to have severe cognitive impairment. Review of the paper medical record and electronic medical record indicated one physician's progress note, dated 5/9/25. Further review of the entire medical record failed to indicate another physician's visit since 5/9/25. During an interview on 8/13/25 at 1:50 P.M., the Chief Nurse Specialist provided the requested physician's visit notes. She said that the only physician's note in the medical record for the Resident was from 5/9/25. During an interview on 8/14/25 at 10:02 A.M., The Director of Nurses said that she would expect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performance reviews for five of five sampled CNA's. Findings include:During the review of five CNA employee records on 8/14/25 at 11:05 A.M., the surveyor noted that five of five sampled CNAs did not receive annual performance reviews. During an interview on 8/14/25 at 11:33 A.M., the Human Resource representative said she provides the Unit Managers with the annual performance review paperwork, and once completed she files them in the employees' file. The Human Resource representative said annual performance reviews for this year have not been completed. During an interview with the Corporate Nurse on 8/14/25 at 12:31 P.M., the above concerns were reviewed. The Corporate Nurse said performance reviews should be completed on an annual basis. The Corporate Nurse said we are currently working on getting all performance reviews completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing behavioral health services were provided for Resident #45. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the behavioral health provider completed follow up services after the introduction of a new medication and failed to alert the provider when his/her behaviors continued and was sent out on a section-12 hospitalization, (an involuntary psychiatric hospitalization). Findings include: Review of the facility's Consultant Services policy, dated April 2015 indicated: [The Facility] will identify and facilitate consultant services to meet the resident's needs to ensure optimum care for each resident/patient through consultant services.The policy did not include information related to communication of resident status from the facility to the provider.Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and psychoactive substance abuse.Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically:1. The facility failed to ensure medications were dated once opened according to manufacturer's guidelines in one of three medication carts observed.2. The facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely in a resident room for one Resident (#40) out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated February 2018, indicated: Licensed personnel will be responsible to check expiration dates on ordered medications, house stock medications, and supplies. Medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel. Review of the Self-Administration of Medications Policy dated July 2015. indicated: Evaluate the resident's cognitive, physical and visual ability to self-administer medications, Update the care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0778 — isolated
    Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents were assisted in making transportation arrangements to Radiology appointments for one Resident (#8) out of a total sample of 27 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was provided assistance to obtain transportation for a brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) appointment as recommended by a Neurologist. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Policy & Procedure Manual Transportation, dated 4/20/2021, indicated the following:- It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are transported safely to and from medical/clinical appointments. It is the goal to ensure residents are transferred to their scheduled appointments and/or events.- The facility may opt to obtain contract transportation for the resident.- If a contracted provider cancels scheduled transportation arrangements, parties will be notified as soon as possible. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate medical record was maintained for one Resident (#52) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include:Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including dementia and repeated falls. Review of Resident #52's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one out of a possible 15, which indicated the Resident has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #52 had an impairment in range of motion in the left hand and required supervision for eating. On 8/12/25 at 9:10 A.M., Resident #52 was observed lying in bed. His/her morning care had not yet been completed, and his/her left hand was observed lying on the bed without an orthotic on and both feet were lying directly on the bed with no protective boot or pillow. There was no orthotic observed near the bed or in the room. On 8/13/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient staffing levels were maintained to safely and adequately meet each resident's personal care needs. Finding Included: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: Staffing Plan: Nursing: Licensed Nurses (LN): RN (Registered Nurse, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse), provided direct care: -Director of Nursing: 1 RN Full time days. -Assistant Director of Nursing: 1 RN full-time days. -2 Unit managers' days: 1 RN, 1 LPN. - Weekend supervisor: 1 RN. -Second Shift Supervisor: Position is open. -12 Nurses for 116 residents first and second shift. -3 Nurses for 116 residents third shift. -8 RN's, 18 LPN's. Direct Care Staff: Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA): -1 CNA per 10 Residents first shift. -1 CNA for 12 Residents second shift. -1 CNA for 20 Residents third shift. -2 Nurses per shift per unit (3) first and second shift and 1 Nurse for third shift each unit (3) -Infection control/wound nurse Staffing Assignments: -On shift software allow staff and scheduler to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record for four Residents (#46, #80, #16 and #53) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #46 staff documented in the medical record that blood pressures were being taken in the left arm, when they were being taken in the right arm. 2a. For Resident #80 the facility failed to maintain a valid Massachusetts Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) in the medical record. 2b. For Resident #80 the facility failed to accurately code the MDS regarding Advanced Directive status. 2c. For Resident #80's his/her medical record failed to indicate any physician notes were included in the medical chart. 3. For Resident #16 the facility failed to accurately document the wearing of bilateral lower extremity multipodus boots 4. For Resident #53 staff documented in the medical record that blood pressures were being taken in the left arm, when they were being taken in the right arm. Findings Include: 1. For Resident #46 staff documented in the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain informed consent for the administration of psychotropic medication for two Residents (#80 and #98) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent-Massachusetts Only, dated February 2016, indicated the following: -Prior to administering psychotropic medication , the facility shall obtain the informed consent of the resident, the resident's health care proxy or the resident's guardian. 1. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility June 2024 and has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/12/24, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #80 scored a 0 out of a possible 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of the record indicated the following: -A Health Care Proxy was on file however the Physician had not yet invoked the HCP. -A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a physician or provider of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine that was not functioning and was unable to be implemented as per the Resident's plan of care for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Condition: Significant Change, dated April 2025, indicated the following: -Staff will communicate with the physician, resident/ patient, and family regarding changes in condition to provide timely communication of resident/ patient status change which is essential to quality care management. -This notification should be documented in the clinical record. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #26's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/22/24 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident protected health information (PHI) was secure and not visible to others on one of three nursing units. Findings include: On 8/27/24 at 8:01 A.M., Nurse #2 prepared medications for a resident on the A unit. Nurse #2 left her medication cart to administer medications and left her computer screen open with the electronic health record visible in the hallway. On 8/27/24 at 8:07 A.M., Nurse #2 prepared medications for a resident on the A unit. Nurse #2 left her medication cart to administer medications and left her computer screen open with the electronic health record visible in the hallway. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 8:09 A.M., Nurse #2 said that she should have locked her computer screen because the resident's protected health information was visible on the screen when she walked away, but she did not. On 8/28/24 at 8:52 A.M., Nurse #7 on the A unit walked away from her medication cart and left the computer screen open with the electronic health record visible and protected health information exposed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the resident's access to the only resident bathroom in the facility located on the level of their main dining room and activity room. Findings include: During a Resident Group Meeting on 8/27/24 at 11:00 A.M., the residents in attendance indicated that the only resident bathroom on the main floor, next to the resident dining room has been out of service for 6 months. They said they were told by facility management that the toilet is cracked but that there is no plan to fix it. The residents expressed being upset stating it is very inconvenient and said that they are forced to go back to their units, during meals if they need to use the bathroom. During an interview on 8/28/24 at 10:47 A.M., a family member said the main floor resident bathroom has been broken for a long time with no resolution from facility and the residents who come downstairs for meals and activities are inconvenienced by it and may miss things…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident-centered personalized care plan was developed and/or implemented for two Residents (#16 and #105) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #16, the facility failed to implement multipodus boots (pressure relieving boots) per his/her physician's order. 2. For Resident #105, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a hearing loss diagnosis. Findings Include: Review of policy titled, Splints/Orthotics/Prosthetics, last revised April 2015, indicated the following: Policy: -Residents will receive splint/orthotic/prosthetic devices as deemed appropriate by the physician and rehabilitation services. Staff will monitor the circulation and skin integrity of residents using these devices at least every shift as part of routine care, or more often as ordered by the physician. -Nursing staff will apply remove the designated splint/orthotic/prosthetic device during scheduled wearing times. -If the resident refuses to wear the device, notify the rehab department,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide showers for one Resident (#100) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -A program of activities of daily living (ADL) is provided to residents to maintain or restore maximum functional independence. The ability of each resident to meet the demands of daily living is assessed by a licensed nurse and/or other members of the interdisciplinary team. A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is developed and implemented based on the individual evaluation to encourage the highest level of functioning. This process is reviewed minimally quarterly. Resident #100 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including heart failure and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #100's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to 1) ensure a diabetic wound dressing was changed daily for one Resident (#8) and 2) failed to follow a physician's order for monitoring of congestive heart failure for one Resident (#100) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes. Review of Resident #8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #8 required supervision for all functional daily tasks. During an interview on 8/26/24 at 10:09 A.M., Resident #8 was observed lying in bed with both legs raised on pillows. The Resident had dressings on both feet, dated 8/24/24. Both dressings were significantly discolored with a brown substance and there was a spoiled odor in the room. When asked about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain the nutrition and hydration status of three Residents (#66, #86, and #34) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to 1) identify and implement interventions for a significant weight loss for Resident #66), 2) identify and implement interventions for a significant weight gain for Resident #86 and 3) failed to obtain monthly weights for one Resident (#34) who was identified to have a significant weight loss when the weight was obtained, out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weights, dated August 2015, indicated the following: -The following residents/patients are weighed weekly X4: -Newly admitted residents/patients. -Newly readmitted residents/patients. -Residents/patients with an unanticipated, unplanned weight loss of >5% in one month. -Residents/patients with an MD order for weekly weights. -Other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, record review and interview the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for two residents (#26 and #30) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #26 the facility failed to ensure physician's orders included settings for a Continuous Passive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine, and that the CPAP machine was functioning and available for use. 2. For Resident #30 the facility failed to obtain a complete physician's order for oxygen administration that included an oxygen flow rate. Findings Include: 1. Review of Facility Policy titled CPAP/ BiPAP Management, dated as revised April 2015, indicated the following: - Licensed nursing will provide CPAP/ BiPAP to treat sleep apnea or sleep disorders as ordered by the physician. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #26's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services consistent with professional standards of practice related to Hemodialysis (the process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine, necessary when the kidneys are unable to filter the blood) were provided for two Residents (#46 and #51) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, for Residents #46 and #51, the facility failed to ensure that emergency supplies were at the bedside. Findings include: The facility policy titled Hemodialysis, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -Policy: to provide comprehensive care to residents/patients that receive Hemodialysis treatments. -Care of a venous catheter: a non-serrated clamp is to be kept at the bedside for emergencies. -Emergency Care: 2. Accidental dislodgement or removal of catheter -a. Clamp the catheter using non-serrated clamp 1. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 and has diagnoses that include End Stage Renal Disease and dependence of renal dialysis. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Trauma Informed Care Plan, with resident specific interventions and triggers, was developed for one Resident (#75), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care, undated, indicated the following: 4. Social Service will screen each resident for a history of trauma upon admission. Documentation regarding the resident's psychosocial well-being including their response to stressful life events/trauma and coping mechanisms will be reflected in the initial Social Service Assessment and/or Social service Progress notes. 5. A trauma informed care plan will be documented in the resident's medical record by social service in conjunction with the IDT Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 and has diagnoses that include alcohol-induced pancreatitis, depression and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/09/24, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident scored a 10 out of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when 1 out of 2 nurses observed made 5 errors out of 26 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 19.23%. Those errors impacted one Resident (#86), out of four residents observed. Specifically, for Resident #86, Nurse #4 failed to administer his/her medications within the one-hour time frame. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration- Oral, dated June 2015 indicated the following: Procedure: 1. Verify Medication order on Medication Administration Record (MAR). Check against physician order. 9. Verify that the medication is being administered at the proper time, in the prescribed dose, & by the correct route. On 8/27/24 at 10:12 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #4 prepare and administer morning medications to Resident #86 including the following: -Metformin 500 milligrams (mg), 2 tablets -Metoprolol 25 mg, 1 tablet -Methocarbamol 500 mg, 1 tablet -Lantus insulin 12 units -Colace…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored according to manufacturer's guidelines in two of four medication carts. 2. The facility failed to ensure that unlicensed personnel were supervised while in the medication room. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Medication Storage room/ Medication Cart Policy, dated February 2018, indicated the following: -The facility provides pharmaceutical services that are conducted in accordance with accepted ethical and professional standards of practice and that meet applicable Federal, State and Local Laws, rules, and regulations. -Medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel. -Storage for other medications will be limited to a locked medication room. 1. On 8/27/24 at 7:45 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the A wing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were followed to prevent the spread of infections, and that appropriate hand hygiene practices were followed. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to ensure a nurse and a certified nursing assistant (CNA) appropriately donned (put on) a precaution gown while caring for a Resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). 2. The facility failed to ensure a nurse performed hand hygiene between glove use. Findings Include: 1. Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, undated, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for preventing transmission of novel or targets multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs). Novel or targeted MDROs are organisms that are resistance to all or most antibiotics tested, are uncommon in a geographic area, or have special genes that allow them to spread their resistance to other genes. -Enhanced barrier precautions require the use of gown and gloves for certain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), whose diagnosis included diabetes, with physician orders to monitor and evaluate skin integrity to his/her feet, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record, when from 03/06/24 through 04/02/24, diabetic foot care was documented as not applicable (N/A) on a recurring basis. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Nursing Documentation, dated 02/2016, indicated licensed staff would document information related to the resident's condition and care provided in the resident's medical record, and documentation would be clear, concise, and not subject to misinterpretation. The Facility Policy, titled Diabetic Foot Care, dated 06/2015, indicated nursing staff would provide diabetic foot care which included washing, examining, and reporting any changes or irregularities to the physician. The Facility Policy, titled Refusal of Treatment and Services, dated 04/2015, indicated that residents had the right to refuse treatment, and that professional staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 2 Residents (#1 and #59) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised November 2017, indicated the following: *Policy *Based on the above, the Interdisciplinary Team develops a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timelines to accommodate preferences, special medical, nursing and psychosocial needs identified in the Resident Assessment Instrument and Interdisciplinary Team. 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in July 2018 with diagnoses including dementia, major depression with severe psychotic symptoms and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #59 has as severe cognitive deficit and was unable to participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. Further review indicated Resident #59 is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to 1. monitor and notify the medical provider to evaluate the effectiveness of a psychotropic medication, prescribed and administered for the targeted behavior of refusing showers for one Resident (#86) and 2. failed to ensure psychotropic medications administered as needed (PRN) were re-evaluated, included a duration of use for 2 Residents (29 and #38) and 3. failed to review the duplicative use of two different anti-anxiety medications for one Resident (#38) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, 1. Resident #86 was administered a dose of Trazadone once a week for 8 consecutive weeks and a shower was not provided. 2. For Resident #38 the facility failed to review the use of PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication every 14 days as required and failed to review the consecutive use of 2 different benzodiazepines (Valium and Xanax) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Psychotropic Medication Management, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for 4 Residents (#46, #74, #88 and #23) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services/Dentures, dated September 2017, indicated the following: -Dental services will be provided to each resident, as needed, by a qualified dentist, as part of the facility's oral health program. -Staff will assist residents in obtaining routine and emergency dental care. Services will be provided by the resident's dentist of choice or by the facilities consulting dentist. -Staff will make transportation arrangements and or provide transportation as necessary to the dentist office for care if such car is not able to be provided at the facility. -The administrator, Director of Nursing, or designee will arrange for emergency dental services if a resident attending dentist is unavailable. Review of the facility policy titled Oral Health, dated August 2018, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an unexpected death to the state survey agency for 1 Resident (#101) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of regulation §483.12(c) indicates that in response to alleged abuse or injuries of unknown origin, the facility must (1) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to 1. investigate a bruise of unknown origin for 1 Resident (#62) and 2. investigate an unexpected death for 1 Resident (#101) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated July 2018, indicated the following: - Any incidents of actual or suspected abuse must have an incident report completed. In addition to the incident report, the supervisory personnel are responsible to ensure that the initial investigation regarding the incident occurs timely and appropriate interventions are put into place to ensure resident safety or protect the resident from additional harm. - These interventions will include the obtaining of statements from witnesses of incidents, the outcome of the supervisory investigation, and the timely notification of Administrative personnel regarding the incident to ensure that a comprehensive internal facility investigation is completed in a timely fashion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary activities of daily living care for a dependent resident for one Resident (#37) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to 1a) provide supervision with meals and 1b) remove unwanted facial hair for Resident #37. Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living dated April 2015 indicated the following: *A program of activities of daily living (ADL) is provided to residents to maintain or restore maximum functional independence. A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is developed and implemented based on individual evaluation to encourage the highest level of functioning. Findings include: 1a) Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in July 2017 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparalysis affecting left dominant side, unspecified osteoarthritis and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #37's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide activities for 1 Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 36 Residents. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, hemiplegia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #23 indicates the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she has intact cognition. The MDS also indicates Resident #23 requires extensive assistance from staff for all functional tasks. On 8/8/23 at 9:26 A.M., Resident #23 was observed in his/her room lying in bed, watching television. Resident #23 said he/she was bored sitting in his/her room watching television every day. There were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided care consistent with professional standards, related to replacing and dating oxygen tubing for two Residents (#32 and #40) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Nasal Cannula, dated and revised November 2020 indicated the following: *Replace and date cannula and tubing weekly or when visibly soiled or damaged Findings include: 1. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #32's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of a possible 15 indicating that he/she is cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #32 requires assistance with all activities of daily living. The surveyor made the following observations: *On 8/8/23 at 10:32 A.M. and 8/9/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive trauma informed care plan for 2 Residents (#38 and #45) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, undated, indicated the following: *Policy It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Procedure: *4. Documentation regarding the resident's psychosocial well-being including their response to stressful life events/trauma and coping mechanisms will be reflected in the Social Service Assessment and/or Social Service Progress Notes. *5. A trauma informed care plan will be documented in the resident's medical record by social service in conjunction with the interdisciplinary team. 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in July, 2023 with diagnoses including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 Resident (#86) was seen by a physician every 90 days out of a total sample of 36 residents. Finding include: Resident #86 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including anemia, Parkinson's Disease, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition and dementia. Review of Resident #86's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date of 5/10/23, indicated Resident #86 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, indicating he/she had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #86 required extensive assistance from staff for care activities including bathing, hygiene, toileting and dressing. Review of Resident #86's medical record indicated a physician's progress note dated 3/15/23. The medical record failed to include any notes from the physician to indicate the Resident was seen by the physician in the last 90 days. During an interview on 8/9/23 at 3:45 P.M., Unit Manager #1 (UM#1) said Resident #86's physician was in last week,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Two out of 4 nurses observed made 2 errors in 27 opportunities on one of four units resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. These errors impacted 2 Residents (#56 and #96) out of 6 residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration by Route or Dosage and dated March 2017, indicated that the nurse is to verify medication orders on Medication Administration Record (MAR) and check against physician order. 1. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses including anemia in chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the doctor's orders dated June 2023 indicated an order for Sevelamer Carb - Renvela (used to treat end stage renal disease) 3200 mg (milligrams) four tablets (800 mg) by mouth three times daily at 8:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., and 4:00 P.M. Medication to be taken with food. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a prescribed therapeutic diet for one Resident (#34) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide lactose free milk during meals for Resident #34. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food & Dining Service, dated April 2015 indicated the following: *The objective of food service is to supply to the resident a diet comparable with his/her needs *Therapeutic Diets: Prepared and served as prescribed by attending physician. Planned by a qualified registered dietitian. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #34's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated that the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of a possible 15 indicating that he/she is cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS indicates that the Resident requires assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. Specifically, staff signed off on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that oxygen tubing was changed, when it had not been changed, for 2 Residents (#32 and #40) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Nasal Cannula, dated and revised November 2020 indicated the following: *Replace and date cannula and tubing weekly or when visibly soiled or damaged Review of the facility policy titled Treatments dated April 2015 indicated the following: *All treatments must be charted as ordered on the treatment sheet by indicating initial inappropriate slot. If the treatment is omitted, circle your initials and indicate on the back of the treatment sheet the date, time, and reason for omission. Findings include: 1. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #32's most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two Residents (#38 and #110), out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 7/25/25, indicated Resident #38 is cognitively intact evidenced by a score of 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS). During an interview on 8/12/25 at 11:18 A.M., Resident #38 was wearing glasses and said he/she is having issues with his/her vision. Resident #38 said he/she goes out to ophthalmology appointments. Review of the physiatry note, dated 7/20/25, indicated: Ophthalmology exam. Patient also evaluated by ophthalmology on 7/1, noted to have reduced VA (visual acuity) of left eye, healthy macula and nerve. Reviewed TIA/ stroke symptoms with patient and to present to ED…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$85,178 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $85,178 — penalty dated 2024-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5AdviniaCare Orchard, LLCEast Providence, RI 1 of 5Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterCenterville, MA 1 of 5Civita Care BayviewWaterford, CT 1 of 5Civita Care NorthbridgeBridgeport, CT 1 of 5Civita Care Sheriden WoodsBristol, CT 1 of 5Lanessa Extended CareWebster, MA 1 of 5Marlborough Hills Rehabilitation & Health Care CenMarlborough, MA 1 of 5Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterHaverhill, MA 1 of 5Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterNorth Easton, MA 1 of 5Southshore Health Care CenterRockland, MA 1 of 5Wadsworth Glen Health Care And Rehabilitation CentMiddletown, CT 1 of 5Worcester Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5AdviniaCare Waterview Villas, LLCEast Providence, RI 2 of 5Berkshire Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterSandisfield, MA 2 of 5Cape Heritage Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSandwich, MA 2 of 5Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5Plymouth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterPlymouth, MA 2 of 5Southbridge Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSouthbridge, MA 2 of 5Webster Manor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWebster, MA 3 of 5Tremont Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterWareham, MA 4 of 5Civita Care MeadowbrookGranby, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA R LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2012
CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2012
CURTIS, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
MOSIER, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE6%since 09/01/2012
REZENDES, LORRIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
SANTILLI, LAWRENCEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER74%since 05/04/2020
ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$941K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 7%Other / private 9%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $941K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$394per resident / day
operating cost
$11,989per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$370per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225298. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next