No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lanessa Extended Care

751 School Street, Webster, MA 01570 · For profit - Partnership · 96 certified beds · (203) 465-8321 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (203) 465-8321 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0603) — cited Apr 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)3 actual-harm citations$119,962 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $119,962 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-08)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
344 Thompson Rd · (508) 671-4050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5 Schofield Ave · (508) 949-0513 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
75 Main St · (508) 461-5087 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13 May St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.5%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.2%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms31.6%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.4%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.6%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.0%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.1%94.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.0%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table38.1%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.7%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.3%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%11.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.641.881.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.051.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge23.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
25.0%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 85.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-03)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-11-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#79) of one applicable resident, in a total sample of 19 residents, who received enteral nutrition (method of delivering nutrition through the stomach or the small intestine) via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube: tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to provide nutrition) received care and services to prevent complications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that all pertinent Physician's orders were implemented relative to the G-tube, that fluids were administered and monitored to maintain acceptable parameters of hydration, resulting in clinical signs of dehydration and need for the administration of intravenous fluids (IV fluids: specially formulated liquids that are injected into a vein to prevent or treat dehydration) for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Feeding, dated April 2015, indicated enteral feeding provides an alterative method of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff maintained a hazard free environment for five Residents (#5, #55, #136, #19, and #25) out of a total of 19 sampled residents and in one out of two medication rooms, resulting in an injury for one Resident (#5). Specifically, For Resident #5 the facility failed to ensure that its staff performed neurological checks, completed a comprehensive fall investigation, and developed and implemented new fall interventions after an unwitnessed fall, resulting in a subsequent fall, a hospital admission and a diagnosed impacted proximal humerus (arm) fracture. 2) For Resident #55 and #136 the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided the required supervision with eating. 3) For Residents #19 and #25 the facility failed to ensure its staff completed an assessment and care plan for smoking safety. 4) The facility staff also failed to ensure that medications were a) secured for one Resident (#136) and b) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff revised the care plan for one Resident (#5) out of 19 sampled residents after he/she sustained an unwitnessed fall on 8/29/22 and had a subsequent unwitnessed fall of similar circumstances on 8/31/22 that resulted in an impacted proximal humerus fracture [A proximal humerus fracture is a break of the upper part of the bone of the arm (humerus)]. Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in November 2015, with diagnoses including Dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety, Alzheimer's Disease, mild cognitive impairment, and moderate intellectual disability. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/17/22, indicated Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a score of 8 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The MDS assessment also indicated the Resident required supervision with one assist for toileting and transfers. Review of the Nursing Note, dated 8/29/22, indicated Resident #5 had a fall in his/her room next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had dementia, resided on a secured unit, was known by staff to exhibit exit seeking behaviors and was assessed at being at risk for elopement, the Facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision to prevent an incident of elopement when on 01/05/26, Resident #1 exited the secured unit, through an alarmed door unbeknownst to staff and was found outside at the end of the block by the police.Findings include:Review of the Facility's policy titled Elopement, dated July 2015, indicated the Facility would maintain a process to screen all residents for risk of elopement, implement preventative strategies for those identified at risk, and institute measures for resident identification at the time of admission. Elopement is defined as the ability of a resident who is not capable of protecting him/herself from harm to successfully leave the facility unsupervised and unnoticed and who may enter harm's way.Review of the report submitted by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident # 1), who developed a pressure related injury on his/her right wrist area and required wound care, the Facility failed to ensure nursing developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions, treatment goals and outcomes that addressed his/her wound care needs. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated November 2017, indicated that: - the Facility provides individualized, person-centered care which is reflected in each resident's care plan. To facilitate the creation of such plans, the Facility performs a comprehensive assessment on all residents. - the care plan will include an assessment of residents' strengths and needs. - the care plans are oriented toward preventing avoidable decline in clinical and functional levels. Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Condition: Significant Change, dated April 2015 indicated that: -In the event of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who sustained a right distal humerus (long bone in upper arm ) fracture that would potentially need surgical intervention to treat, and who required a one week follow up appointment with his/her Orthopedic Surgeon, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality care and services when transportation services were not properly arranged for several of his/her follow up appointments, which resulted in more than a months delay in him/her being seen and evaluated by an Orthopedic Surgeon. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record indicated that he/she was admitted to the Facility during September 2021 and his/her diagnoses included dementia, chronic kidney disease, anemia, and a recent fractured right humerus. Review of the Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #1 was hospitalized for a right distal humerus fracture, had an immobilizer splint placed on the right arm and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled substance medications management and reconciliation for four locked medication carts on two Units (Elmwood Unit and Windsor Unit). Specifically, the facility failed to: -maintain accurate records of controlled substance medications that had been removed from locked medication carts and stored in the DON's office while awaiting disposal/ destruction. -maintain accurate records of controlled substance medications that were awaiting disposal/destruction for a period of six months. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Disposal of Medications and Medication Related Supplies, revised December 2019, indicated: -Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. -All controlled substances remaining in the facility after a resident has been discharged , or the order is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the facility was free of pests on one Unit (Windsor) and the facility's Main Dining Room. Specifically, the facility failed to: -obtain routine pest control services. -obtain pest control services when staff and residents at the facility identified fruit flies in the facility's Main Dining Room and on the Windsor Unit. Findings include: Review of the facility's Pest Control Services Agreement with [Contracted Pest Control Company], dated 1/15/20, indicated the following: -Inspection and treatment for pests would be provided at least 12 times per year. -Areas of service included the exterior perimeter of the facility, common areas, kitchen and food preparation areas, dining areas, storage areas, restrooms, laundry, and resident rooms upon request. -The technician was to check in on each visit and maintain the pest control log book. Review of the facility's Pest Control Service Reports indicated: -Pest control services were provided to the facility 11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-03 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for one discharged Resident (#82) out of three closed records reviewed, and for four Residents (#235, #38, #54, and #51) out of a total sample of 18 active resident records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #82, code Hospice services on the Resident's Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) when the Resident received Hospice services while at the facility. 2. For Resident #235, code that the Resident was taking antipsychotic, antidepressant, antianxiety, and anticoagulant medications when staff administered these medications to the Resident during the observation period for the MDS Assessment, while the Resident was at the facility. 3. For Resident #38, code that the Resident was taking an opioid medication when staff administered the medication to the Resident during the observation period for the MDS Assessment. 4. For Resident #54, ensure that the Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 18 residents, was free from a significant medication error when an order for twice daily Allopurinol (medication used to prevent Gout pain - caused by a high uric acid level in the blood, leading to joint pain and inflammation) was not accurately transcribed to a new monthly Medication Administration Record (MAR). Specifically, for Resident #23, the facility failed to ensure that the Allopurinol medication order for twice daily administration was accurately transcribed to a new month's MAR, resulting in decreased Allopurinol medication administration to once a day, and increasing the Resident's risk for gout pain not being appropriately managed. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled Physician Orders- Transcription, dated April 2015, indicated: -All written physician's orders or telephone orders must be duly noted and accurately transcribed by licensed nursing staff. -Carefully transcribe orders as written to MAR and/or Treatment Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four residents with a Physician ' s order for pureed texture diet received chicken at the lunch meal that was a pureed consistency (altered diet in which foods are ground and strained to a smooth soft pudding like consistency free of lumps or texture making them easier to chew and swallow). Findings include: Review of the facility US Foods Diet Guide last updated 3/19/21, indicated the following: -National Dysphagia Diet (NDD) Level 1: Pureed is designed for people who have moderate to severe dysphagia and reduced ability to protect their airway. -NDD Level 1 diet consists of pureed and cohesive foods in pudding-like consistency. Review of the facility Dining Services Assistant Job Description dated April 2013, indicated the following: -The primary purpose of your position is to provide assistance in all dining service functions as directed and in accordance with established dining services policies and procedures. -Major Duties and responsibilities include to follow therapeutic diet cards as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the facility kitchen and dining areas and follow safe sanitation and food handling practices while storing and serving food to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff stored a multi use thickening agent in the facility's main kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner. 2. Ensure staff stored food at the proper and safe holding temperature on the steam table prior to serving the food to residents on the Windsor Unit. 3. Ensure staff labeled and stored food in a sanitary and safe manner in the facility kitchen and unit nourishment kitchens and maintained the facility dishwasher at the proper temperature for sanitization of dishware. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dietary Department Guidelines, revised 1/2014, indicated: -The facility must store, prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions. -The Dietary Department Supervisor will oversee the entire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide notification to the invoked Health Care Proxy (HCP) and obtain consent for the use of psychotropic medications for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain informed consent and provide information regarding the risks and benefits of the medication use to Resident #23's HCP prior to the administration of Ativan (psychotropic medication used for anxiety). Findings include: Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent Policy, dated February 2016 indicated the following: -Prior to administering psychotropic medication, the facility shall obtain the informed written consent of the resident, the resident's health care proxy or the resident's guardian. Informed written consent shall be obtained on a form approved by the DPH. The written consent form shall be kept in the resident's medical record. -Informed written consent shall include the following information: >The purpose of administering the psychotropic medication, >The prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 58 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one Resident (#79) out of a total sample of 18 residents, for the clinical appropriateness to self-administer medications. Specifically, for Resident #79, the facility failed to complete an assessment for the appropriateness and safety of self-administration of medications when an order was received to leave a Benadryl cream at the Resident's bedside. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated July 2015 indicated: -Evaluate the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to self-administer medications. -Complete the Self Administration Evaluation and document whether the resident can safely self-medicate or is unable to safely self-medicate. If the resident can't safely self-medicate, document the reason why. -Inform the resident/responsible party of the decision. -Update the care plan for self-medication to include where the medication will be stored, documentation of self-administration, and location of the drug administration. -Perform resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to act upon, provide timely responses, and document written responses and rationale to grievances of resident care and services brought to facility administration by the Resident Council. Specifically, the facility failed to: A) address grievances related to staffing levels on the 11:00 P.M.- 7:00 A.M. shift when reported in Resident Council Meeting on 12/18/24. B) document response and rationale when concerns with staffing levels on 11:00 P.M.- 7:00 A.M. shift were reported in Resident Council Meeting on 1/21/25. Findings include: Review of the facility Grievance Policy, undated, indicated the following: -The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve any grievances . -The facility will appoint a grievance officer who will be responsible for overseeing the grievance process including: >Receiving and tracking grievances to conclusion >Conducting any necessary investigations >Issuing written grievance decisions to the resident if requested Residents will be notified individually or through postings in prominent locations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately execute Advance Directives for two Residents (#41 and #234) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident # 41, ensure that the MOLST (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form was valid and reflected the signature of Resident #41's invoked (made active by a Physician) Health Care Proxy (HCP- the person chosen as the healthcare decision maker when the individual is unable to do so for themself) after the Physician had determined that the Resident lacked the capacity for informed medical decision making. 2. For Resident #234, ensure that the MOLST form was valid and reflected the signature of the Resident who maintained his/her capacity for informed medical decision making. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for MOLST, dated August 2015, indicated: -the admitting nurse will note the existence of the MOLST form on the admissions assessment and review the form for completeness (e.g. signed by the resident/patient or legally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC: notice issued to a resident who is receiving benefits under Medicare Part A when all covered services end) and/or Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN: notice issued to a resident when a facility determines the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all his/her Medicare benefit days) were accurately issued for three Residents (#483, #63, #34) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #483: >issue a NOMNC with Provider contact information inserted above the title of form. >provide the NOMNC two days prior to discharge. 2. For Resident #63: >provide a NOMNC with Provider contact information inserted above the title of form. >provide paper copies of NOMNC to responsible party. >obtain signature on the SNF ABN form, indicating the responsible party…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one Resident (#54) out of a total sample size of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain Resident's #54 wheelchair in a clean and sanitary manner when the Resident was dependent on the wheelchair for mobility and the wheelchair was visibly soiled. Findings include: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait, Mobility and Weakness. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #54: -was severely cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of a total possible score of 15. -was dependent for wheelchair mobility. Review of the Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for Resident #54 indicated: -Resident #54 had impaired mobility and required intervention of a wheelchair for a mobility device. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of practice for two Residents (#56 and #51) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #56, schedule a urology appointment when the Resident had been discharged back to the facility from the hospital with a kidney stone and related infection. 2. For Resident #51, implement a Physician order for a Pulmonary Consultation to evaluate the Resident for clinical symptoms and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). 3. For Resident #51, implement the Physician's orders for weekly weight monitoring. Findings include: Review of the facilty Policy and Procedure for Consultant Services dated April 2015, indicated: >The organization will identify and facilitate consultant services to meet the Resident's needs, to ensure optimum care for each resident/patient through their consultant services. >The licensed charge nurse will obtain an order for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a smoking environment that was free of accidental hazards for one Resident (#62), out of a total sample size of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #62 was appropriately supervised during smoking activity when the Resident was assessed as needing supervision, placing the Resident at risk of accident and/or injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Smoking; revised November 2020 indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of the facility to provide a healthy and safe environment for residents, staff, and visitors by limiting the use of tobacco smoking materials on its campus. -Purpose is to afford residents the privilege of smoking while maintain a safe and clean environment within the policy of this facility, that also is respectful to the non-smoker. <Residents who smoke will be evaluated for their ability to smoke safely upon admission, quarterly, and as dictated by any significant change in condition, to ensure that they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to an indwelling urinary catheter for one Resident (#34) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -reassess Resident #34's indwelling catheter status upon re-admission when the Resident was hospitalized with indwelling urinary catheter associated complications. -obtain a Physician order to include the current indwelling urinary catheter size required for the Resident. -update the Resident's Indwelling Catheter Care Plan to reflect the Resident's current indwelling catheter status. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Urinary Catheter Insertion (Indwelling), dated April 2015, indicated an indwelling urinary catheter would be inserted when the resident's clinical condition demonstrates necessity by a licensed nurse, as ordered by the physician. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in February 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff to provide care to residents on one unit (Elmwood) out of two sampled nursing units, when no staffing waivers were in place. Specifically, the facility failed to: -ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and respond to resident's basic needs on the 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. (night) shift. -ensure that positions are filled timely when there are staff call outs. -schedule the type and level of staff that reflect the expectations described in the facility assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated July 2024, indicated: -Total Number of beds: 96 -Windsor Unit: >Short term rehab unit/long term care with 49 Beds. >Residents on the unit are short term rehab services, medication management. >Some residents do transition to long term care and are at a higher functioning level. -Elmwood Unit: >Secure long term care unit with 47 beds. >Residents often transition to this unit for long term care. >Most residents have advanced cognitive loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that competency in skills and techniques necessary to provide resident care were demonstrated for one Certified Nurses Aide (CNA [#3]), out of a total of five staff reviewed. Specifically, for CNA #3, the facility failed to ensure that annual competency training with demonstrated competency in the skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs was completed for 2024 as required. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated July 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Staff training/education and competencies: Required in-service training for nurses' aides. In-service training must: >Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year. >Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training >Address areas of weakness as determined in nurses' aides performance reviews and facility assessment and may address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff. >For nurses' aides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary Behavioral Health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for two Residents (#51 and #23) out of a total sample size of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the Residents (#51 and #23) received follow-up Behavioral Health Services after recommendations for continued follow-up visits were made by the Provider. Findings include: Review of the facilities policy on consultant services dated April 2015 indicated: >The facility will identify and facilitate consultant services to meet the resident's need, to ensure optimum care for each resident/patient consultant services. 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Major Depressive Disorder, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated: -The Resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications (medication that affect the mind, emotions and behavior) administered were necessary for one Resident (#27) out of five applicable residents reviewed, out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -For Resident #27, that the obtained consent from the Resident's Health Care Proxy (HCP) for the use of psychotropic medications was necessary when the Informed Consent for Psychotropic Administration was obtained from and signed by another residents' HCP. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Management, dated April 2015, indicated: -Each resident's drug regimen will be free from unnecessary drugs. Administration of psychoactive medications will focus on the individual needs of the resident and will be prescribed only when necessary and clinically indicated to treat specific conditions and symptoms as diagnosed and documented. -Notify resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of meal intake percentages by Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) when Resident #24 was identified as being at risk for weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Documentation, dated 2/2016 indicated: -The nursing personnel documents information related to the resident's condition and care provided in the resident's medical record. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including Alcohol Dependence, Traumatic Fracture, COPD and Muscle Weakness. Review of Resident #24's Clinical Progress notes indicated: -11/27/24 - Dietary Risk Meeting: >Resident admitted to risk on 11/20/24 .weight 153.6, weight loss 8.5% over 30 days and 10.9% over 90 days, >Resident re-weight 11/20/24: 159.4, weight loss 5% over 30 days . -12/11/24 - Dietary Risk Meeting: >Resident admitted to risk on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices per professional standards for three Residents (#7, #47 and #11) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #7, appropriately provide care for a urinary drainage bag that was not in use when the Resident interchanged the urinary drainage bags for daytime and nighttime use, placing him/her at risk for contamination and infection. 2. For Resident #47, assist with hand hygiene prior to eating, following the Resident's participation in a group activity when his/her hands were visibly soiled, placing the Resident at risk for contamination and infection. 3. For Resident #11, maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing high contact care during a bolus feeding (administering a dose of formula through a feeding tube using a catheter syringe [syringe without a needle]) procedure, placing the Resident at risk for transmission of organisms.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 who had a history of exit seeking and routinely wandered the unit during the evening shift and Resident #4, his/her roommate who was also ambulatory) the Facility failed to ensure that they were free from involuntary seclusion by being confined to their room by staff, when on 01/12/24 from approximately 9:30 P.M. to 11:30 P.M., a plastic bag was tied from the door handle of Resident #1 and Resident #4's room to the handrail in the hallway outside their room, by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 who admitted to doing it in order to prevent Resident #1 from exiting his/her room to wander the unit and exit seek. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as implemented February 2023, indicated the Facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Further review of the policy indicated it included the following definition of involuntary seclusion:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4), the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy related to the need to immediately report an allegation of involuntary seclusion to the Administrator or designee, when on 01/13/24, Nurse #1 and Nurse #2 became aware during the overnight shift, that the door to a bedroom occupied by two ambulatory residents was tied shut, preventing them from exiting the room at will. However, although both Nurse #1 and Nurse #2 were both aware of the incident, the Facility Administration was not made aware of the incident until 01/15/23 (two days later), when Director of Nurses (DON) #1 spoke with Nurse #1 and Nurse #2 after discovering a progress note about the incident. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as implemented February 2023, indicated the Facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4), the Facility failed to ensure that an allegation of involuntarily seclusion, was reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours, as required, per Federal Regulations and Facility policy. When on 01/15/24 at approximately 7:30 A.M., Director of Nurses (DON) #1 became aware of an incident that occurred on 01/12/24, where the door to the bedroom occupied by Resident #1 and Resident #4 was found to be tied shut, however the incident was not reported that day to DPH until 6:07 P.M., more than ten hours later. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as implemented February 2023, indicated the Facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The Policy indicated the following definition of Involuntary Seclusion: the separation of a resident from other residents or from his/her room or confinement to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who had dementia and was known by staff to wander the hallways and exhibited exit seeking behaviors, the Facility failed to ensure that Resident #2 was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision, in an effort to maintain his/her safety to prevent an elopement. On 03/11/2024, at some point during the day shift, unbeknownst to staff, Resident #2 exited the Facility, unit staff only became aware of the elopement after Resident #2's lunch tray was left untouched, and staff could not locate him/her. Resident #2 was found later that same day by the police, seated on the side of a road, four miles from the Facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled Elopement, dated July 2015, indicated the Facility would maintain a process to screen all residents for risk of elopement, implement preventative strategies for those identified at risk, institute measures for resident identification at the time of admission, and conduct missing resident procedures, as warranted. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) the Facility failed to ensure they provided sufficient nursing staff so that the care and safety needs of the residents were adequately met, when on 01/12/24 during the evening shift, Resident #2 was able to wander off the locked unit he/she resided on, and that same night, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 admitted to securing the door to Resident #1's room to prevent him/her from exiting his/her room to wander and exit seek while she attended to another resident, because the unit was short staffed. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated as implemented February 2023, indicated the following: - Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse, neglect, exploitation and/or misappropriation of resident property is more likely to occur with deployment of trained and qualified, registered, licensed, and certified staff on each shift in sufficient numbers to meet the needs of residents, and assure that the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to provide care and services to the meet the needs of four Residents (#40, #39, #47 and #78) on two Units (Windsor and Elmwood), out of two units observed. Specially, the facility failed to ensure that: 1) For Resident #40, scheduled medications were provided within the required timeframe. 2) For Resident #39, nursing staff were available to assess and medicate for pain as needed. 3) For Resident's #47 and #78, adequate staff were available to assist with the toileting needs. 4) adequate staff were available to assist with meals and dining. Findings include: Review of the Payroll -Based Journal data for Quarter Three (April 1 - June 30, 2023) indicated excessively low weekend staffing. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 10/27/23, indicated the facility capacity was 96 total residents on two units. The Windsor Unit capacity was 49 residents and the Elmwood Unit capacity was 47…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff completed training as outlined in the Facility Assessment Tool. Specifically, -the facility failed to provide documentation that staff competencies were completed for six (Nurse's #2, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #10) out of seven staff training records reviewed. -the facility could not verify that current licensed nursing staff (Nurse's #4, #2, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #10) had completed their required annual competencies. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, most recent revision undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: Staff training/education and competencies: -Orientation includes conducting separate competencies for our Nurses and Certified Nurses Aides (CNAs) -All mandatory training and competencies are completed annually and/or PRN (as needed). -Competency requirements met at time of Orientation and Yearly for Nurses include glucose, pulse oximetry, occult blood testing, injection safety, insulin pen, IV, pump, pain assessment, wound dressing for Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policies reviewed, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for one Resident (#79) of two applicable residents with catheters, out of a total sample of 19 residents, who had an indwelling urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to allow for urine flow). Specifically, the facility failed to: -obtain Physician's orders for the care of the Resident's catheter, including irrigation orders and changing the urinary drainage bag. -accurately monitor urinary output. -ensure that an assessment was completed to determine rationale for continued use of the urinary catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Urinary Catheter Care, dated April 2015, included the following: -Ensure the catheter tubing was secured . to prevent urinary tract infections caused by urinary reflux, always keep the drainage bag below the level of the resident's bladder. -Position the tubing for straight drainage. Review of the facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record and policy reviews, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices to reduce the potential transmission of infection for one Resident (#25), out of a total sample of 19 residents, and for one unit out of two units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1) the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn by staff for Resident #25, who was identified as requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-used in addition to standard precautions to prevent the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms [MDROs]) 2) facility staff appropriately cleaned and disinfected medical equipment after resident use, specifically a glucose monitoring device (meter used to test the concentration of glucose in the blood and is performed by piercing the skin to draw blood and then applying the blood to a test strip) on the Elmwood Unit. Findings include: 1) Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, undated, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified of a significant weight change and recommendations for scheduled appointments for one Resident (#79), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Physician when Resident #79 had: A) recommendations for a Computerized Tomography scan (CT: X-ray images taken from different angles of the body to create a cross sectional image of the bones, blood vessels, and soft tissue). B) an appointment to replace his/her gastrostomy tube (G-tube: tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). C) a significant weight loss (weight change of 5 percent (%) or more in one month, 7.5% or more in three months or 10% or more in six months). Findings include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI: TBI: brain dysfunction resulting from a sudden, external, physical injury to the head), G-tube status, and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, records and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Physician orders were implemented for three Residents (#51, #79 and #43), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. ensure that weights were obtained as ordered by the Physician for Resident's #51 and #79 2. ensure a Dermatology Consult was obtained as ordered by the Physician for Resident #43 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weights, dated August 2015, included the following: -Residents will be weighed at the discretion of the Interdisciplinary Team -Residents will be weighed monthly, unless clinically indicated -Weights are documented in the resident's medical record . 1a. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in November 2019, with diagnoses including Dementia (progressive and persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that annual performance reviews were completed as required for two out of four Certified Nurses Aides (CNAs). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that expectations, individual performance and training requirements were communicated to two CNAs through the annual performance appraisal process. Findings include: Review of the policy, titled Employee Performance Appraisals, dated February 2010, indicated: -Properly done performance appraisals demonstrate that this facility is seriously committed to helping its employees develop their full potential. It is a time when Supervisors/Department Heads can communicate essential information to employees about their jobs, their future, and employees can express their hopes, aspirations, and needs to their supervisors. -Accuracy in deriving a decision regarding employee appraisals can only be achieved through regular documentation. By directly observing the performance of your staff on a day-to-day basis, you will be able to record specific examples of behavior. Keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, policy reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the attending Physician for two Residents (#33 and #53), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #33, to report the Pharmacy recommendations to the attending Physician pertaining to orders needed for a psychotropic (medication that affects a person's mental state) medication. 2. For Resident #53, to report the Pharmacy recommendations to the attending Physician pertaining to an anti-nausea medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Consultant Services, dated 4/2015, indicated the following: -A note should be recorded on the consultation form by any health care consultant who sees the resident/patient at the request of the MD or the family. The Consultant should document findings and recommendations on this form. -The charge Nurse will then notify the attending Physician of the findings and he/she can then order the specific treatments as outlined by the consultant. -A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure that the use of as needed (PRN) medications were appropriately evaluated for two Residents (#58 and #79) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, 1) For Resident #58, that an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (medications that are used to treat a variety of conditions and affect mood, behavior and perceptions) was limited to 14 days and was re-evaluated for continued use by the Provider. 2) For Resident #79, that a PRN antipsychotic medication (class of medications that are used to manage psychosis [a severe mental condition in which thoughts and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality]) was limited to 14 days. Findings include: 1) Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including Dementia (a type of cognitive decline that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning, and independent function), Major Depression, Anxiety, and mixed obsessional thoughts and acts. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%) for one Resident (#60), out of four residents, out of 34 opportunities. Specifically, the medication error rate was observed to be 11.76%, when four scheduled medications were administered beyond the required timeframe of one hour after the scheduled time. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated 2017, included, but not limited to the following: -Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only administered by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system (procurement, storage, handling, and administration). The facility has sufficient staff and a medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of medications with unnecessary interruptions. -Five Rights- Right resident, right drug,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one Resident (#37), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain accurate records related to activities participation and refusals of participation. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in August 2020 with diagnoses including unspecified Dementia (a type of cognitive decline that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning, and independent function), Psychotic Disturbance (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), and mood disturbance with anxiety. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #37 was able to make his/herself usually understood and could usually understand during communication with others. During an interview on 11/5/23 at 12:49 P.M., Family Member #2 said when they visited the facility, Resident #37 was always in his/her room and never in the day room or participating in group activities. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all required staff members attended the scheduled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting, as required. Specifically, the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) failed to attend two of the last five quarterly QAPI meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The Quality Assurance committee members are the Medical Director or his/her designee, the Director of Nursing (DON), the Infection Preventionist (IP), and at least three other staff members, one whom is the Administrator, Owner, or Board Member. -Committee meetings are held on a monthly basis at a minimum. The committee shall maintain written meeting agendas, minutes, attendance records, and QAPI program progress reports. Review of the attendance sheets from 10/31/22 and 4/24/23 did not indicate the Infection Preventionist was in attendance during the scheduled quarterly meetings held on those dates. During an interview on 11/8/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff administered the Influenza Vaccine as required, after obtaining consent for one Resident (#12), out of five applicable residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Immunization of Residents, undated, indicated the following: -The resident or the resident's legal representative will be provided education regarding the pros and cons of the vaccine prior to administration. -Administer Influenza Vaccine (0.5 milliliter) in the deltoid muscle and document vaccination in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). If the vaccine was not given, record the reason(s) for non-receipt of the vaccine (i.e., medical contraindication, resident refusal). Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in December 2019 with a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (a condition marked by impaired muscle coordination (spastic paralysis) and/or other disabilities, typically caused by damage to the brain before or at birth). Review of the Resident Annual Influenza Education form dated 10/23/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure that staffing included the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for a minimum of 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week as required, when during June 15, 2023 through July 15, 2023, the facility had no RN coverage for several days, for an entire 24 hour period. Findings include: Review of the Facility's nursing schedules dated Thursday, June 15, 2023 through Saturday, July 15, 2023 indicated there was no Register Nurse coverage during the day, evening or night shift for the following days: - Saturday, June 17, 2023. - Sunday, June 18, 2023. - Saturday, June 24, 2023. - Sunday, June 25, 2023. - Saturday, July 1, 2023. - Sunday, July 2, 2023. - Tuesday, July 4, 2023. - Saturday, July 8, 2023. - Sunday, July 9, 2023. - Saturday, July 15, 2023. During interview on 9/25/23 at 2:54 P.M., the Director of Nursing said she was aware of the Registered Nurse (RN) requirement of one RN for 8 consecutive hours, for each 24 hour period and said the facility had not met that requirement for the dates identified by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided sufficient licensed Nurse staffing levels on two out of two resident units, based on the facility census, resident daily needs, and in accordance with the Facility Assessment Tool. Specifically, lack of appropriate staffing levels reported by Resident #23 and Resident #35. Findings include: On 8/31/22 at 8:31 A.M., the surveyor observed one licensed Nurse working on the Windsor Unit on the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM (day) shift. Review of the facility Detailed Census Report, dated 9/1/22, indicated that the facility housed 91 residents and that the facility capacity for residents was 96. During an interview on 8/31/22 at 8:40 A.M., Nurse #3 said that she worked by herself the previous weekend on the Windsor Unit and that she typically worked alone once to twice a week. Nurse #3 said that when this occurred, resident treatments, doctors' recommendations, and completion of medication and treatment administration records were missed. During an interview on 8/31/22 at 8:50 A.M., Resident #23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff assessed residents and individuals entering the facility for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 (a virus that causes a respiratory disease) each shift during an outbreak as required. The facility also failed to ensure that their Legionella management program was updated as required. Specifically, 1) During outbreak testing on the Elmwood Unit, the staff failed to assess for COVID-19 symptoms each shift for two Residents (#46 and #47) out of a total of three residents sampled. 2) The facility also failed to ensure that two Hospice staff entering the facility were screened for symptoms of COVID-19 and exposure to others with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection as required, and 3) The facility failed to update their Legionella program as required. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) guidance titled Update to Caring for Long-Term Care Residents during the COVID-19 Response, including Visitation Conditions, Communal Dining, and Congregate Activities, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff maintained a clean, homelike environment in the two out of two resident shower rooms, located on each unit. Specifically, the tile, grout and caulk in both resident showers were covered with a black mold/mildew like substance, impacting the care of one Resident (#41). During an interview on 8/31/22 at 9:10 A.M., Resident #41 said he/she refused to use the shower on the Windsor Unit because it had black mold in it. The Resident said staff offered to take him/her to the shower on the Elmwood Unit but the Resident said it was not clean and it smelled bad. Resident #41 further said there was usually one housekeeper to clean both units (census of 91) five days a week and no one to cover the remaining two days. On 8/31/22 at 4:27 P.M., the surveyor observed there was a black mildew-like substance on the tile, grout and caulk in the Windsor Unit shower. The black substance was in the seam where the floor met the wall and between the tiles extending up from the floor. On 8/31/22 at 4:32 P.M., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff followed the plan of care for four Residents (#83, #78, #35 and #23) out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Implementation to monitor blood glucose levels for one Resident (#83), 2) Implementation to monitor weekly weights for one Resident (#78), and 3) Administration of a Physician ordered medication for two Residents (#35), and 4) Resident (#23). Findings include: 1. For Resident #83 the facility failed to ensure that its staff monitored finger stick blood sugars (FSBS- used to determine blood glucose levels) as ordered. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnosis including Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Review of the August 2022 Physician's orders indicated to check the FSBS four times per day. Review of the August 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that the FSBS was not checked 33 out of 110 times that it was scheduled to be checked. During an interview on 9/06/22 at 10:08 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided professional standards of quality care for one Resident (#83) out of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, staff failed to rotate subcutaneous (SC-layer of skin directly below the dermis) injection sites for the administration of insulin. Failure to do so could result in hard lumps of extra fatty deposits at the injection sites. Findings include: Review of the American Diabetes Association website indicated the following: Don't inject insulin in the exact same place each time .if insulin is injected near the same place each time, hard lumps of extra fatty deposits may develop. Review of the facility's policy for Medication Administration of SC Injections, dated March 2017, indicated the following: -Insulin injection sites rotated within the same anatomic region for consistent absorption. -Document site and rotate site. 1. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnosis including Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Review of the August 2022 Physician's orders indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — pattern
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that its staff offered the necessary care and services to get out of bed to the wheelchair on a daily basis for one Resident (#55) out of a total of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no evidence that Resident #55 was offered the opportunity to get out of bed on 26 days in July 2022 and 21 days in August 2022. Findings include: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), unspecified Dementia without behavioral disturbance and legal blindness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/13/22, indicated Resident #55 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a score of 5 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Further review of the MDS assessment indicated the following for the seven day look back period: -Transfers (how resident moves between surfaces including to or from: bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position) was coded as Activity did not occur. -Surface to surface transfers (transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided diabetic foot care, to prevent complications of the feet related to Diabetes Mellitus, for two Residents (#44 and #68) out of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Diabetic Foot Care, dated June 2015, indicated the policy was to provide diabetic foot care by a qualified nursing staff and foot condition is noted, and changes reported, as warranted. 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with diagnosis including Diabetes Mellitus and diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that most often affects the legs and feet). Review of the July 2022 and August 2022 Physician's orders did not indicate an order to provide diabetic foot care. Review of the July 2022 and August 2022 Treatment Administration Records (TARs) did not indicate diabetic foot care was provided. During an interview on 9/1/22 at 7:04 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) reviewed the July 2022 and August 2022 Physician's orders and said there should have been an order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided care and services of a midline (a long catheter inserted into the upper arm with tip located just below the axilla, used for administration of intravenous (IV) medications), specifically related to flushing the midline before and after IV medication administration, for one Resident (#68) out of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #68 was admitted to the facility in July 2022. Review of the clinical record indicated the Resident was started on two IV antibiotics, Ceftriaxone and Flagyl, on 8/24/22 for the treatment of osteomyelitis (bone infection). Review of the August 2022 Infusion Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the following orders: -Ceftriaxone one gram (gm) IV every 24 hours -Metronidazole one gm IV every 8 hours -Flush midline before medication administration with 10 milliliters (ml) of normal saline (NS) -Flush midline after medication administration with 10 ml of NS and 5 ml (10 units/ml) of Heparin (to prevent blood clots). Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that Physician visits were complete. Specifically, that orders were signed and dated, for four Residents (#19, #44, #55, and #25) out of four applicable sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in June 2022. Review of the clinical record indicated the Resident was seen by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 6/10/22 and by the Physician on 6/21/22. Review of the Physician's orders indicated the last signed orders were June 2022. Further review indicated the Physician or NP had not signed the Resident's orders for July 2022 or August 2022, as required. During an interview on 9/6/22 at 3:59 P.M., the Regional Clinical Specialist said Resident #19 should have been seen by a Physician or NP every 30 days since admission [DATE]) and orders should have been signed with each required visit. 2. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in June 2021. Review of the clinical record indicated the Physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure Physician visits were done in the required intervals for four Residents (#19, #44, #55 and #25), out of four applicable sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in June 2022. Review of the clinical record indicated the Resident was seen by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 6/10/22 and by the Physician on 6/21/22. Further review indicated no Physician or NP visits were done in July 2022 or August 2022, as required. During an interview on 9/6/22 at 3:59 P.M., the Regional Clinical Specialist said Resident #19 should have been seen by a Physician or NP every 30 days since admission [DATE]). 2. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in June 2021. Review of the clinical record indicated the Resident was seen by the Physician on 3/23/22 and by the Physician's Assistant (PA) on 8/17/22. There were no visits between March 2022 and August 2022. During an interview on 9/6/22 at 3:59 P.M., the Regional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staffing included a Registered Nurse (RN) for a minimum of 8 hours a day, 7 days a week, as required. Specifically, the facility had no RN coverage over three days between 7/28/22 and 8/31/22. Findings include: Review of the facility's nursing schedule from 7/28/22 to 8/31/22 indicated that there was no RN coverage on 8/6/22, 8/20/22 and 8/21/22. During an interview on 8/31/22 at 3:47 P.M., the Director of Nurses said that the requirement for RN coverage in the facility is one RN for 8 hours, for each 24-hour period, but there was no RN coverage for the 8/6/22, 8/20/22 and 8/21/22, dates as required.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that its staff kept one Resident (#35), out of a total of 19 sampled residents, free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility did not request a refill for Caplyta (antipsychotic medication) in a timely manner on two different occasions resulting in the medication not being available to be administered to the Resident as ordered for four consecutive days in July 2022 and 17 consecutive days in August 2022. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and a personal history of suicidal behavior. Review of the medication insert for Caplyta 42 milligrams (mg) included, but was not limited to the following: -Monitor all antidepressant-treated patients for any indication for clinical worsening and emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, especially during the initial few months of drug therapy, and at times of dosage changes. Review of the Physician's orders indicated the following orders: -Caplyta 42 mg, one capsule by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that its staff maintained complete and accurate medical records for medication administration for one sampled Resident (#35) out of a total of 19 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to document the administration of an antipsychotic medication, and inaccurately documented that another routine medication was administered, when the medication was not available in the facility during the documented administration time period. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and a personal history of suicidal behavior. Review of the Physician's orders indicated the following orders: -Caplyta 42 milligrams (mg), one capsule by mouth at bedtime (initiated 7/8/22). -Atvorstatin 10 mg, one tablet by mouth at bedtime (initiated 6/27/22). Review of the July 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed: -There were no entries for the administration of Caplyta at 8:00 P.M., on 7/9/22, 7/12/22 and 7/28/22. -There were no comments on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility staff failed to ensure that its Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee was composed of the required members. Specifically, there was no evidence the Medical Director or his/her designee was at the quarterly QAPI meetings held on 10/15/2021 and 1/26/22, and there was no evidence the Director of Nurses (DON) was at the quarterly QAPI meetings held on 10/15/21, 1/26/22 and 4/26/22. Review of the attendance sheet for the quarterly QAPI meeting held on 10/15/21 showed there was no evidence the DON and the Medical Director or his/her designee participated in the meeting. Review of the attendance sheet for the quarterly QAPI meeting held on 1/26/22 showed there was no evidence the DON and the Medical Director or his/her designee participated in the meeting. Review of the attendance sheet for the quarterly QAPI meeting held on 4/26/22 showed there was no evidence the DON participated in the meeting. During an interview on 9/7/22 at 10:15 A.M. the Administrator reviewed the attendance sheets with the surveyor and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all of its staff participated in mandatory training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention for five out of five sampled current employees. Specifically, the facility had no process in place to track attendance, and ensure all staff participated in the required training and no evidence that those who had participated were assessed to determine if the training had been effective. Findings include: Review of the facility Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated September 2020, indicated the following: -All employees will be provided an educational program regarding abuse prohibition practices. -Educational programs shall include the following information: Definition of abuse, definition of exploitation, definition of misappropriation of resident property, definition of neglect, appropriate methods to manage residents with behavioral symptoms, and mechanisms for staff to report allegations of abuse without reprisal. -The initial education/training of personnel will be provided during general…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff obtained written consent, including education on the risk and benefits of proposed care related to the use of an anti-psychotic medication, for one Resident (#19), out of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent, dated February 2016, indicated that prior to administering a psychotropic medication, the facility shall obtain the informed written consent of the Resident, the Resident's Health Care Proxy (HCP) or the Resident's guardian. The written consent form shall be kept in the Resident's medical record. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnosis including Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Review of the September 2022 Physician's orders indicated to administer Risperidone (anti-psychotic) one milligram (mg) by mouth daily, initiated on 6/9/22. Review of the clinical record indicated no written consent, including education on the risk and benefits, for the use of Risperidone. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff notified the Physician about missed medications for one Resident (#35) and a fall for one Resident (#5) out of a total of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) The facility failed to notify the Physician that: a) Resident #35 missed four consecutive administrations of an antipsychotic in July 2022, and b) 17 consecutive administrations of an antipsychotic and 15 consecutive administrations of a statin (cholesterol lowering medication) in August 2022. 2) The facility also failed to notify the Physician when Resident #5 had a fall on 8/29/22. Findings include: 1. For Resident #35 the facility failed to ensure that its staff notified the Physician of medication omissions in July and August of 2022. Resident #35 was admitted in June 2022 with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and a personal history of suicidal behavior. Review of the Physician's orders indicated the following orders: -Caplyta 42 milligrams (mg), one capsule by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff followed the facility grievance policy and made prompt efforts to resolve a grievance for one Resident (#35), out of a total of 19 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the grievance officer of a grievance form filed by a family member on 7/8/22, and there was no evidence an attempt had been made to resolve the grievance. Findings include: Review of the facility grievance policy, revised November 2016, included but was not limited to the following: -Residents have the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances may include issues with care or treatment that has been received or not received, the behavior of staff or other residents and other concerns regarding the resident's stay at the facility. -Upon receipt of the grievance, the staff person receiving the grievance shall immediately notify the grievance officer. -The grievance officer shall begin the grievance process by logging a summary of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff completed a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal and state required process that is used to identify evidence of serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual or developmental disabilities in all individuals seeking admission to a nursing facility), in a timely manner, for one Resident (#44) with a SMI, out of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Review of the PASRR Level I Screening, dated 6/29/21, indicated the Resident had a positive SMI screen, but a Level II PASRR Evaluation (used to confirm if the individual has SMI and, if so, whether the individual requires a nursing facility level of care and specialized services) was not indicated at that time due to Exempted Hospital Discharge (maximum 30 calendar days). Further review indicated if the nursing facility determined that the Resident's stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided care consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#52) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to change the oxygen tubing as ordered for Resident #52. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration Nasal Cannula, dated November 2020, indicated to replace, and date cannula tubing weekly or when visibly soiled or damaged. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in October 2021, with diagnosis including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (COPD) and Emphysema (a condition affecting the alveoli (air sacs) of the lungs, where they are abnormally inflated with air, making it harder to breathe). On 8/31/22 at 8:05 A.M., the Surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed with oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute (l/min) administered via nasal cannula (N/C). The oxygen tubing had a date of 3/9 marked on a piece of secured tape. Review of the August 2022 Physician Orders indicated: - Oxygen at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff monitored pain and assessed the effectiveness of pain interventions for one Resident (#35) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility staff did not assess Resident #35's pain every shift as ordered and did not have documented evidence they assessed the effectiveness of pain interventions after each occurrence as indicated on the care plan. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including low back pain unspecified, bilateral primary Arthritis of the hips, pain in the left knee, displaced transverse fracture of the left patella (knee cap), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with delayed healing, and Fibromyalgia (disorder that affects muscle and soft tissue characterized by chronic muscle pain, tenderness, fatigue and sleep disturbances). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/3/22, indicated Resident #35 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 14 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff did not administer a psychotropic medication, specifically an anti-psychotic medication, without an appropriate diagnosis, for one Resident (#78) out of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses including unspecified Dementia with behavioral disorder, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/4/22, indicated the Resident had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a score of 6 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of a Physician's Assistant (PA) note, dated 8/1/22, indicated there were no new concerns other than the Resident was impulsive and attempted to leave the facility. -The Resident would be started on Seroquel (anti-psychotic) 12.5 milligrams (mg) three times a day due to impulsivity. -Further review indicated no documentation that the addition of the medication was reviewed with the Resident's Representative. Review of the Informed Consent for Pyschotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-02-03 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to post nursing staff data daily, at the start of each shift, relative to licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. Specifically, the facility failed to post nursing staff data that included: -total number and the actual hours worked for Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) -resident census. Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 8:13 A.M., the surveyor observed the daily staffing information dated 1/28/25 posted on a dry-erase board mounted on the wall next to the front desk and in the lobby area by the front door and accessible to residents and visitors. The staffing information posted on the dry-erase board indicated the following: Day: RN -1, LPN-3, CNA - 8 Afternoon: RN - 1, LPN-3, CNA-8 Night: RN -1, LPN - 1, CNA - 4 Further review of the daily staffing information posted did not indicate the total number and the actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed staff and the facility resident census. During an interview on 1/28/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-03 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment in a timely manner for one Resident (#82) out of three Residents reviewed in a closed record sample. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) by the fourteenth calendar day after the determination that a significant change in the Resident's status had occurred. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, indicated the following relative to timing for a SCSA: -An SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program. -The ARD (Assessment Reference Date) must be less than or equal to 14 days after the determination that the criteria for an SCSA are met (determination date plus 14 calendar days). -The MDS completion date could be no later than the fourteenth calendar day after determination that significant change in resident's status occurred (determination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for two Residents (#37 and #43), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam and Mood Interview for Resident #37 2) accurately code the use of an antipsychotic (used to treat psychosis) medication for Resident #43 Findings include: 1) Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in August 2020 with diagnoses including unspecified Dementia (a type of cognitive decline that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning, and independent function), Psychotic Disturbance (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality), Mood Disturbance with Anxiety (feelings of distress, sadness or symptoms of Depression, and anxiety). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #37 was able to make themselves usually understood and could usually understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$119,962 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $119,962 — penalty dated 2023-11-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5AdviniaCare Orchard, LLCEast Providence, RI 1 of 5Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterCenterville, MA 1 of 5Civita Care BayviewWaterford, CT 1 of 5Civita Care NorthbridgeBridgeport, CT 1 of 5Civita Care Sheriden WoodsBristol, CT 1 of 5Marlborough Hills Rehabilitation & Health Care CenMarlborough, MA 1 of 5Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLowell, MA 1 of 5Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterHaverhill, MA 1 of 5Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterNorth Easton, MA 1 of 5Southshore Health Care CenterRockland, MA 1 of 5Wadsworth Glen Health Care And Rehabilitation CentMiddletown, CT 1 of 5Worcester Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5AdviniaCare Waterview Villas, LLCEast Providence, RI 2 of 5Berkshire Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterSandisfield, MA 2 of 5Cape Heritage Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSandwich, MA 2 of 5Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5Plymouth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterPlymouth, MA 2 of 5Southbridge Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSouthbridge, MA 2 of 5Webster Manor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWebster, MA 3 of 5Tremont Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterWareham, MA 4 of 5Civita Care MeadowbrookGranby, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA III LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2014
CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 06/01/2014
CURTIS, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2014
MOSIER, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE7%since 06/01/2014
SANTILLI, LAWRENCEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER62%since 10/03/2019
ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$420K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 91%Medicare 1%Other / private 8%

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $420K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$312per resident / day
operating cost
$9,475per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225395. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next