No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

689 Main Street, Haverhill, MA 01830 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (978) 373-1131 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (978) 373-1131 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 20251 actual-harm citation$265,351 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $265,351 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-27)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
680 Main St · (978) 374-4258 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.0 mi
310 Main St · (978) 521-4671 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
426 Main St · (978) 521-9779 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lawrence St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%16.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms75.1%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.2%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication58.7%19.5%18.9%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.2%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.0%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.0%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.9%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.1%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.381.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.781.501.80typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
22.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 22.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.7%CMS range 31.4–53.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 5.5–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge22.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge22.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 5.0–17.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
36.0%
Total nursing turnover
31.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · H2025-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to protect one Resident (#92), from neglect, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility neglected to schedule a follow-up appointment for over ten months when a physician's order was written for a Gastrointestinal Doctor consult to determine a possible colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening (stoma) in the abdominal wall to divert stool from the colon directly into a bag or pouch) reversal procedure resulting in emotional distress. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Policy & Procedure Manual Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated February 2023 indicated the following: - It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. - Definitions: Neglect means failure of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to appropriately monitor the effective use of a low temperature dish machine. Specifically, the facility failed to document the parts per million (PPM) of the sanitizing solution, to ensure effective sanitization. Findings include: Review of the current manufacturer's guidelines, for the facility's contracted dish machine maintenance company, indicated that chemical sanitization PPM should be checked with daily test strips. During an observation on 2/11/26 at 11:56 A.M., the dish machine in the kitchen ran a wash cycle at 126 degrees Fahrenheit and a rinse cycle at 176 degrees Fahrenheit. The staff member in the dish machine area said that the dish machine used chemicals to clean the dishes in the machine. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 12:00 P.M., the Food Service Director said that she believes the dish machine was a low temp machine and used chemicals to clean the dishes. The Food Service Director said that the last time she recorded the PPM, with a test strip, was over a month ago and was unaware that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable environment on two floors where residents reside. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' comfort was maintained and comfortable temperatures were present, resulting in residents wearing jackets, hats, gloves inside and throughout the day and night, even when extra blankets and hot beverages were available. Findings include: a.) During the initial tour on the second-floor unit on 2/10/26 between 7:39 A.M., through 2/10/26 at 8:26 A.M, the surveyor observed several residents wearing winter gloves, winter hats, and winter coats, the surveyor received the following complaints from residents: - its friggen freezing. - I'm so cold, I am wearing gloves. The Haverhill Board of Health came in last week because they 'got lots of calls', look at the temperature in my room it is 58.7 degrees. The Maintenance man 'doesn't bleed the system' and it is 'too cold to shower'. - My room is so cold, there are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for one resident #109, out of a total sample of 24 residents, that recommended services were implemented in accordance with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II Evaluation Determination Summary. Specifically, Resident #109 was screened to meet PASRR criteria for SMI (serious mental illness) with recommended behavioral health services, individual psychotherapy. Findings include: Resident #109 was admitted in October 2025 and has diagnoses that include dysphagia, and gastrostomy status (a gastrostomy tube is surgically placed to provide direct access to the stomach for nutrition, hydration, and medication when oral intake is insufficient or unsafe), post-traumatic stress disorder, opioid use, anxiety disorder and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #109 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed for one Resident (#37), out of a total sample of 24 resident to provide standards of quality of care. Specifically, the facility failed to identify an alteration in Resident #37's skin resulting in a delay in providing treatment and monitoring to ensure it was not worsening. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Preventative Skin Care, dated April 2015 indicated it is the policy of this facility that routine preventative skin care be done by the C.N.A. (Certified Nursing Assistant) every shift for those residents at risk for altered skin integrity. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to chronic diastolic heart failure, morbid obesity, muscle weakness and venous insufficiency. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #37 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify and eliminate all known and foreseeable accident hazards in the resident's environment for three Residents (#75, #9, and #112), out of 24 total sampled residents. Specifically,1 For Resident #75, the facility failed to ensure a safe, hazard free environment when Resident #76 had an electric space heater in his/her room. 2. For Resident #9, the facility failed to ensure a safe, hazard free environment when Resident #9 had a small electric space heater in his/her room. 3. For Resident #112 the facility failed to ensure a safe, hazard free environment when Resident #112 had a small electric space heater in his/her room. Findings include: 1. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in January 2025. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #75 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 2/10/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for the care of a suprapubic urinary catheter (a tube placed through the suprapubic region into the bladder to drain urine) for one Resident (#51) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the size of Resident #51's catheter was the same size the physician ordered. Findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including stroke and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/26, indicated that Resident #51 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Stats (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. This MDS indicated Resident #51 had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #51's plan of care related to suprapubic catheter care, dated 7/27/22, indicated:- Resident has a supra pubic 18 x 30 ml (milliliters) catheter due to neurogenic bladder. Review of Resident #51's physician's order, dated 12/2/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for two Residents (#40 and #7) out of sample of 24 residents. Specifically,1 For Resident #40 the facility staff failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for the administration and liter flow rate of oxygen to be administered. 2. For Resident #7 the facility failed to ensure that nursing consistently administered oxygen in accordance with the physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration dated as revised November 2020, indicated to deliver low flow oxygen, per the physician's order via nasal cannula. 1.Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with diagnoses including centrilobular emphysema. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident 40's cognition is cognitively intact as evidenced by a scored 15 out of 15 on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#11) was free from a significant medication error, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #11, the facility failed to ensure nursing administered intravenous (IV) daptomycin (antibiotic medication) was administered to a resident with a diagnosis of bacteremia (blood infection).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Intermittent Medication Administration, dated as effective [DATE], indicated to safely administer intermittent infusion of medications or solution to a resident in a subacute setting. Procedure: 2. Verify the physician's order.7. Inspect medication or solution for leaking, cracks, particulate matter, clarity, and expiration date. If the product is expired or integrity is compromised, report and return to the pharmacy. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses including bacteremia, pulmonary embolism, anxiety, collapsed vertebra, pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated once opened according to manufacturer's guidelines in one of three medication carts observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy ', dated 2/2018, indicated:- Licensed personnel will be responsible for checking expiration dates on ordered medication, house stock medications, and supplies. On 2/10/26 at 9:15 A.M., the surveyor and Nurse #4 observed the following in the [NAME] floor medication cart:- One Symbicort inhaler, opened and undated.- One Humalog insulin pen, opened and was not labeled with name or date.- One Lantus insulin pen, opened and undated.- One Lispro insulin vial, opened and was not labeled with name or date. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 2:11 P.M., Unit Manager #1 said that Nurse #4 had informed her of the open,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse outside near the dumpster, potentially hindering pest management efforts. Findings include: During initial screening on 2/10/26, several residents complained of pest sightings, particularly mice in their bedrooms. During resident council on 2/10/26 at 1:15 P.M., 7 out of 8 residents complained about seeing mice in their rooms. Review of the pest control service report, dated 12/22/25, indicated the following: Theres pallets of trash outside on the ground, this attracts pests, need better trash program You have uncovered trash in the break room with the rear door open and trash outside. This is exactly why you have mice issues. Review of the pest control service report, dated 2/5/26, indicated a recommendation pending to clean dumpster and cover trash. During observations on 2/11/26 at 12:29 P.M. and 5:00 P.M., the dumpster outside was left open on the top and side and was filled with bags containing trash. During an observation on 2/12/26 at 7:25 A.M., the dumpster outside was left open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program identified and ensured continuous evaluation of care delivery systems and to prevent continued concerns that affect the quality of life of the residents on all resident care units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance Improvement plan was established when sources of concern were reported related to the residents being cold. Findings include: Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated April 2015 indicated the (Organizations) Health Care Systems facilities will have effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement programs to improve the quality of life, and quality of care and services delivered in facilities.During the survey conducted on 2/10/26 through 2/12/26 multiple residents residing in the facility on both floors said they have been reporting that they are cold most of the winter until 2/12/26, when they reported feeling more heat.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on one unit ([NAME]), out of four units and for one Resident (#109) residing on the [NAME] Unit.Specifically, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing care on the [NAME] Unit:For Resident #109, the facility staff failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing high contact care for the Resident on EBP with a feeding tube.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), revised 7/2022, indicated the following:-It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for preventing transmission of novel or tarted multi-resistant organisms (MDROs). Novel or targeted MDROs are organisms that are resistant to all or most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment during dining on 4 of 4 units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were served on standard dining ware and cutlery and instead were served Styrofoam boxes and plastic cutlery due to the dish machine being broken for approximately the last three months. Findings include: During breakfast and lunch meals of the entire survey period from 2/24/25 through 2/27/25, residents were observed eating their meals out of Styrofoam take-out containers and with plastic cutlery. During the resident screening process on 2/24/25, multiple residents from the first-floor units reported that all their meals have been served in Styrofoam containers and with plastic cutlery for months. One resident reported it is difficult to eat from plastic fork because the food will not stay on the utensils. Another resident on the first-floor reported that his/her food is always cold when delivered and it is likely from being in a Styrofoam box. During the resident screening process on 2/24/25, multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was functioning properly and replace it with a new, functional dish machine. Findings include: During breakfast and lunch meals of the entire survey period from 2/24/25 through 2/27/25, residents were observed eating their meals out of Styrofoam take-out containers and with plastic cutlery. During the resident screening process on 2/24/25, multiple residents from the first-floor and second-floor units reported that all of their meals have been served in Styrofoam containers and with plastic cutlery for months. During the kitchen walk-through on 2/25/25 at 11:14 A.M., the Foodservice Director (FSD) said the dish machine has been broken and not functional for at least one month. The FSD then said there is a brand-new dishwasher in the hallway and we are waiting for it to get installed, the FSD continued to say it has been in the hallway for a lot longer than one month. The FSD then said since the dish machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews for two Residents, (#50 and #16), out of three residents observed, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5%. When one out of two nurses observed made three errors out of 28 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 10.71%. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #50, Nurse #1 administered Linzess (oral medication for constipation) after a meal when the medication was ordered to be administered 30 minutes before a meal. 2.) For Resident #16, Nurse #1 administered the incorrect dose (two sprays instead of one) of a nasal spray (Azelastine HCL, used for allergies) and Nurse #1 failed to administer the correct fiber medication (psyllium husk instead of calcium polycarbophil). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medications Administration - Oral, dated as revised June 2015, indicated: 1. Verify medication order of the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 6. Compare the medication label to the resident's MAR. 9. Verify the medication is being administered at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to 1. Ensure a treatment room containing resident-specific creams, lotions and other biologicals was locked while unattended on the first floor unit and 2. Ensure medication carts were locked while unattended by staff on the first and second floor units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated and revised January 2025, indicated the following: - Medications are stored primary in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel. - Storage for other medications will be limited to a locked medication room. - The medication cart is to be kept locked at all times when not in use by the nurse. The medication cart is to be locked when stored in the medication room or some other location. 1. The surveyor made the following observations on the first-floor medication treatment room next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for one Resident, (#52), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the needed assistance with a meal was provided resulting in a.) the Resident resorting to feeding him/herself with his/her hands and b. served the Resident in a Styrofoam dish with plastic utensils. Findings include: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 and has diagnoses that include vascular dementia and dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/6/24, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #52 scored a 4 out of a possible 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #52 required supervision or touching assistance for eating. Review of the current Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for Resident #52 indicated the following intervention: -Eating: max assist, dated as revised on 2/24/25. On 2/24/25 at 8:25 A.M., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for the investigation of allegations of abuse, protection of residents during investigations, reporting of allegations and investigative findings, and taking corrective actions to protect other residents from potential abuse for one Resident, (#55), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated February 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. -Abuse means the willful infliction of injury unreasonable confinement intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercation's Abuse also includes the deprivation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for one Resident (#55) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. -Abuse means the willful infliction of injury unreasonable confinement intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercation's Abuse also includes the deprivation of any individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical mental and psychosocial well-being instances of abuse of all residents irrespective of any mental or physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach of Resident #6 while he/she was in bed. Findings include: The facility policy titled Call Light, Use of, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -All residents/patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within his/her reach when unattended. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in January 2011 and has diagnoses that include dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing) and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting right dominant side (stroke). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/20/25, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #6 scored a 15 out of a possible 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #6 requires substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility. Review of the current Functional mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents on the first-floor unit were provided with care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, two different surveyors at two different times observed Nurse #1 prepare and administer medications without referencing the medication administration record in the electronic health record. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019 indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one Resident, (#52), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #52 the facility failed to provide assistance with feeding. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated as April 2015, indicated: -A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is developed and implemented based on the individual evaluation to encourage the highest level of functioning. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 and has diagnoses that include vascular dementia and dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/6/24, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #52 scored a 4 out of a possible 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #52 required supervision or touching assistance for eating. Review of Resident #52's care card, dated as revised on 12/2024, indicated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions related to pressure injury healing were implemented for two Residents, (#5 and #39), out of a total of 25 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 and Resident #39's air mattresses was on the correct setting. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Support Surface' undated, indicated the following but not limited to: -A physician's order is required for the use of a specialty support surface. The order shall include the type of mattress, the mode (alternating or static), and setting. -Specialty support surfaces will be checked each shift for proper functioning and or inflation. 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 is moderately cognitively impaired evidenced by a score of 11 out of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident, (#39), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the correct setting. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Nasal Cannula dated November 2020, indicated the following but not limited to: -To deliver low oxygen flow per physician's order (generally 1-6 LPM (liters per minute) and 24% -45% concentration) via nasal cannula. -Set the oxygen liter flow to the prescribed liters flow per minute. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, interstitial pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one Resident, (#86), out of 25 sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #86 the facility failed to maintain accurate neurological flow sheets after two unwitnessed falls. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Neurological Signs, dated August 2015, indicated the following: Any resident who sustains a head injury or when a head injury is questioned or suspected will have neurological signs monitored as follows: - Every fifteen (15) minutes for one (1) hour - Every thirty (30) minutes for one (1) hour - Every hour for four (4) hours - Every four (4) hours for sixteen (16) hours - Every eight (8) hours for forty eight (48) hours Neurological signs to be evaluated are inclusive of: - Pupils reaction to light (PEARL) - Level of Consciousness - Change in mental status - Change in speech - Change in strength in extremities - Vital Signs - Blood Pressure, Pulse, Respirations - Head pain - Nausea/vomiting The findings of each evaluation is compared, analyzed and documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOT CORRECTED Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and standards, increasing the risk of contamination and spread of infection for residents in the facility. Specifically, two different surveyors at different times during the day shift observed Nurse #1 touch pills directly with her ungloved hands during the medication pass. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medications Administration - Oral, dated as revised June 2015, indicated: 3. Perform hand hygiene. 14. Do not touch the medication when opening the bottle or unit dose packaging. 1. On 3/19/25 between 7:16 A.M., through 7:24 A.M., the surveyor made a continuous observation of Nurse #1 going between two medication carts on the first-floor unit. The surveyor observed Nurse #1 preparing medications from several different prescription medication cards, over the counter bottles, and narcotics, Nurse #1 was placing medications directly into her ungloved hands. Nurse #1 placed the medications into medication cups, and Nurse #1 administered medications to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and a review of invoices, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for two of two resident occupied floors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure bedroom ceilings, walls, furniture, bathrooms and floors were undamaged and clean. Findings include: 1. On 3/28/24 at 12:34 P.M. the surveyor started an observation of the second floor rooms room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom ceiling was stained brown. room [ROOM NUMBER]- The bathroom ceiling was stained brown, behind bed A and B, the walls were scuffed and patched, without paint. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom ceiling was stained brown. room [ROOM NUMBER] - A hole in the wall behind bed B. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Mouse droppings under the radiator and the bathroom ceiling was stained brown. room [ROOM NUMBER] -The bathroom ceiling was stained brown and the bathroom heat vent was coming off the wall. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Holes in the wall behind bed B, the bed B head board was broken, there were mouse droppings in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure its roof did not leak, which caused chronic widespread damage to bedroom and hallway ceiling tiles in resident care areas and 2. Ensure it had an effective pest control program. Findings include: 1. On 5/6/24 throughout the morning, the surveyors observed the first and second floor resident bedrooms and common areas. First floor: room [ROOM NUMBER] - Two ceiling tiles had brown stains. One ceiling tile had a stain approximately a foot in diameter and the other ceiling tile had two splotches of brown stains. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Two bedroom ceiling tiles by entrance door are bulging and have brown stains measuring approximately 24 inches x 30 inches. Two bathroom ceiling tiles above the toilet have dark brown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and review of Pest Control Logs and the Pest Control contract, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program on two of two resident occupied floors. Findings include: Review of the Pest Control Services Agreement dated 8/8/2018, indicated a technician will inspect and treat for pests, including rodents, on a monthly basis. The agreement indicated that the resident bedroom will be treated upon request. Review of the Pest Control invoices indicated that from September 2023 through February 2024, technicians inspected and treated the building. Review of the Pest Control log, kept on the first and second floor nursing stations, indicated the Pest Control company had not inspected or treated resident bedrooms during November and December 2023, and as of 3/29/24 had not inspected or treated for pests, including rodents, during March 2024. Review of the Pest Control logs indicated 24 entries in which resident and staff reported mice in different locations, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for five Residents (#7, #17, #23, #36 and #62) that care plans were implemented, out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically: 1. For Residents #7, #17, #23 and #62, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals, per the plan of care. 2. For Resident #36, the facility failed to ensure his/her heels were offloaded. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) dated April 2015 indicated the following: A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is developed and implemented based on individual evaluation to encourage the highest level of functioning. 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in January 2011 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, depression and anxiety, stoke and dysphagia (difficulty eating). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #7 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#105) grievance regarding missing personal items was addressed, out of a sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, titled Grievance Policy, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - The facility will appoint a grievance officer who will be responsible for overseeing the grievance process including: - Receiving and tracking grievances - Conducting any necessary investigations; - Maintaining the confidentiality of information associated with a grievance (e.g. identity of a resident who makes an anonymous complaint); - Issuing written grievance decisions to the resident if requested; and - Coordinating with the state and federal agencies if necessary. - Upon receipt of the grievance, the staff person receiving the grievance shall immediately notify the grievance officer. - The grievance officer shall begin the grievance process by logging a summary of the grievance (if oral), the date the grievance was received and by initiating an investigation. - Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to state officials for one Resident (#105) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, implemented February 2023 indicated, but was not limited to, the following: The facility will have written procedures that include: -Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable). Within specified timeframes: -Immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. -The Administrator will follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to confirm the initial report was received, and to report the results of the investigation when final within 5 working days of the incident, as required by state agencies. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition provided via a gastrostomy tube (a tube surgically inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach with the purpose of delivering food, typically in the form of liquid formula) was provided according to professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #112's enteral nutrition was administered within the physician-prescribed parameters resulting in a clinically significant and unintentional weight gain. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Enteral Feeding, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -Enteral feeding provides an alternative method of nutritional support via a gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube and is used to enhance and maintain nutritional status when there is an inability to take adequate nutrients orally. Procedure: -Check physician order for formula, rate and water flushes Resident #112 was admitted to the facility in December 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation for one resident (Resident #63) of a total of 36 sampled residents, the facility failed to implement medication orders and treatments for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line sites. Specifically: the facility failed to document administration of the antibiotic ceftriaxone and saline flushes, assess the PICC line site, change and label the dressing, change the needless connector, change the tubing, or measure the external catheter length. The facility policy Central Venous Access Device Catheter Dressing Change dated January 2022, included but was not limited to: - Refer to the IV order form [Infusion Therapy Flow Sheet] for dressing change frequency. - Dressing changes will occur according to the IV order and when the dressing is compromised (drainage, moisture observed, loose, soiled). - Assessment should occur at least every two hours during a continuous infusion, before during and after medication administration, during dressing changes, at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for one Resident (#105) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to facilitate the replacement of Resident #105's dentures. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Dental Services/Dentures, revised September 2017, indicated the following: Procedure: -Staff will assist residents in obtaining routine and emergency dental care. Services will be provided by the resident's dentist of choice, or by the facility's consulting dentist. -Staff will make transportation arrangements and/or provide transportation as necessary to the dentist's office for care, if such care is not able to be provided at the facility. -Nursing personnel will be responsible for supervision, and implementation of any prescribed changes made by the dentist and authorized by the resident's attending physician. -The appropriate health care professional will document the provision of dental services and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation for two Residents (#63, #115) out of a total of 36 sampled residents, the facility failed to document medication orders and treatments for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line sites. Specifically: 1. For Resident #63, the facility failed to document administration of the antibiotic ceftriaxone and saline flushes, assess the PICC line site, change and label the dressing, change the needless connector, change the tubing, or measure the external catheter length. 2. For Resident #115, the facility failed to document PICC line site assessment, dressing changes, changing needleless connectors, and measuring external catheter length. The facility policy Central Venous Access Device Catheter Dressing Change dated January 2022, included but was not limited to: - Refer to the IV order form [Infusion Therapy Flow Sheet] for dressing change frequency. - Dressing changes will occur according to the IV order and when the dressing is compromised (drainage,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that had a systematic analysis and action plan to rectify identified issues. Specifically, after implementing actions to manage environmental concerns in the facility which included pest control management, cleanliness in the facility and managing repairs needed in the facility, the facility failed to measure the success and track the performance to ensure improvements were sustained. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Policy & Procedure Manual Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)' with no revision date indicated the following. -It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and addresses all the care and unique services the facility provides. -The QAPI plan will address the following elements: a. Design and scope of the facility's QAPI program and QAA Committee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to infection control practices during a medication pass. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Administration-Oral' dated June 2015 indicated in #14, do not touch the medication when opening the bottle or unit dose packaging. During medication pass on 3/27/24 at 7:39 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 dispense five medications by using her fingers to place the medications into a medication cup. During an interview on 3/27/24 at 7:43 A.M., Nurse #1 said that she should not have touched the medication.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the call device system was working in one bedroom located on the first floor (room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings include: On 5/6/24 at approximately 7:52 A.M., the surveyor entered room [ROOM NUMBER], and the Resident located in Bed C asked the surveyor to jiggle the call light string to turn off the call light. The Resident said the call light apparatus was broken and if the call light string was not hung in just the right way it would activate the system for each of the three beds in the room. The surveyor observed that the call lights for all three beds were activated, even though no one had pulled their call light strings. The surveyor moved the call light string in different directions and eventually the call lights turned off. The Resident said the call light system had not been functioning properly for many weeks. The Resident said he/she had told nursing about this issue may times over the past few weeks but it was still broken. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents (#3, #5 and #109), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically:1. For Resident #3 the MDS nurse failed to code a high-risk medication accurately. 2. For Resident #5, the MDS nurse failed to include a fall sustained by Resident #5 on the most recent MDS and, 3. For Resident #109, the MDS nurse failed to document the use of a gastrostomy tube (a tube used for enteral nutrition) These failures resulted in inaccurate MDS assessments being transmitted to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services. Findings include: 2. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in March 2016 and has diagnoses that include dementia, and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 scored a 1 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating Resident #5 as severely cognitive impaired. Further, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · No revisit needed

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$265,351 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $129,326 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
  • $136,025 — penalty dated 2024-03-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-11 for 15 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-29 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5AdviniaCare Orchard, LLCEast Providence, RI 1 of 5Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterCenterville, MA 1 of 5Civita Care BayviewWaterford, CT 1 of 5Civita Care NorthbridgeBridgeport, CT 1 of 5Civita Care Sheriden WoodsBristol, CT 1 of 5Lanessa Extended CareWebster, MA 1 of 5Marlborough Hills Rehabilitation & Health Care CenMarlborough, MA 1 of 5Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLowell, MA 1 of 5Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterNorth Easton, MA 1 of 5Southshore Health Care CenterRockland, MA 1 of 5Wadsworth Glen Health Care And Rehabilitation CentMiddletown, CT 1 of 5Worcester Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5AdviniaCare Waterview Villas, LLCEast Providence, RI 2 of 5Berkshire Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterSandisfield, MA 2 of 5Cape Heritage Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSandwich, MA 2 of 5Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5Plymouth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterPlymouth, MA 2 of 5Southbridge Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSouthbridge, MA 2 of 5Webster Manor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWebster, MA 3 of 5Tremont Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterWareham, MA 4 of 5Civita Care MeadowbrookGranby, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA III LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2014
CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 07/01/2015
CURTIS, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2014
MOSIER, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE7%since 06/01/2014
SANTILLI, LAWRENCEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER62%since 10/04/2018
SENRA, PRISCILLAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2020
ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$695K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 2%Other / private 6%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $695K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$335per resident / day
operating cost
$10,193per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$335per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225218. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next