No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

120 S Main Street, Centerville, MA 02632 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (508) 778-1835 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 778-1835 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
474 West Main Street
Pharmacy
1080 Falmouth Rd · (508) 778-4064 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
555 Main St · (508) 775-1856 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.8%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.7%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.3%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.6%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.4%94.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.1%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine24.3%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.3%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%11.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.321.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.471.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
11.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 11.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.3%CMS range 45.6–62.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.5–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge11.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge14.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge11.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting83.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.9–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
29.1%
Total nursing turnover
47.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-20)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2022-09-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff identified, addressed, and monitored significant weight changes for two Residents (#106 and #65) with unplanned, significant weight changes, out of a total sample of 25 residents. In addition, the facility failed to weigh residents according to physician's orders and implement nutritional interventions to prevent further weight loss. Specifically, the facility failed 1. For Resident #106, to ensure the Resident was weighed upon admission and weekly as ordered and implement nutrition recommendations timely to prevent weight loss. 2. For Resident #65, to ensure the Resident was weighed per physician's orders or reevaluated following a significant weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights, dated August 2015, indicated the following: The following resident/patients are weighed weekly X 4 weeks: *Newly admitted resident/patients (unless clinically not indicated).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure mechanical equipment in the main kitchen was maintained in safe operating condition, specifically (a) the plate warmer cart and (b) the walk-in freezer in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 4-5 Maintenance and Operation 4-501 Equipment 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment. (A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under Parts 4-1 and 4-2. (B) EQUIPMENT components such as doors, seals, hinges, fasteners, and kick plates shall be kept intact, tight, and adjusted in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. Review of the facility's policy titled Dietary Department Guidelines, revised May 2012, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Equipment: Any piece of equipment, dish, or utensil will be discarded when it is cracked, broken,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#6 and #11) with wounds, out of a total sample of 23 residents, received necessary treatment and services to promote healing. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #6, to complete weekly skin assessments and to follow the vascular physician's recommendations for care and treatment of a non-pressure wound to the Resident's left right foot; and 2. For Resident #11, to discontinue treatment to an arterial ulcer on the lateral left foot, leading to two different treatments being conducted daily and failed to follow the physician's order for the treatment by applying an adhesive bandage. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Skin and Wounds, reviewed in January 2025, indicated the following: -if a resident presents with a venous, arterial or diabetic ulcer, the wound will be assessed on a weekly basis -non-pressure alterations in skin integrity also include skin tears and post op surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff assisted one Resident (#84), out of a total of 23 sampled residents, in replacing bilateral hearing aids that went missing to maintain hearing ability and enhance communication. Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident #84 was admitted to the facility in February 2024. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/21/25, indicated Resident #84 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15, indicating he/she has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated bilateral hearing aids present. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated May 2025, included an Audiology Consult as needed (3/10/25). On the following dates and times, the surveyor observed Resident #84 not wearing hearing aids and was unsuccessful in engaging the Resident in conversation due to their difficulty hearing: -05/14/25 at 09:35 A.M. -05/15/25 at 08:30 A.M. -05/15/25 at 02:08 P.M. -05/16/25 at 08:12 A.M. -05/20/25 at 02:09 P.M. During an interview on 05/16/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were communicated to the physician and addressed in a timely manner for one Resident (#76), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Ensure a recommendation from October 2024 by the pharmacy consultant to evaluate continued need of Oxycontin and MS Contin (both opioid medications that are used for severe pain) was reviewed and responded to by the provider; and b. Ensure February 2025 consultant pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely to clarify the need for Protonix (reduces stomach acid) 40 milligrams (mg) twice a day, and to evaluate the need for continued use of as needed Oxycodone (medication used for breakthrough pain). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review Monthly Report, dated as revised December 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The Consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that medications were accurately reconciled by nursing for one Resident (#76), out of a total sample of 23 residents, to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Eliquis (apixaban) (an anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent blood clots) was administered according to physician's orders following a hospitalization for a left knee joint fusion, resulting in the Resident receiving nine additional doses of the medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing Policy & Procedure Manual, last revised 8/4/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility reconciles medication frequently throughout a resident's stay to ensure that the resident is free of any significant medication errors. -Medication reconciliation refers to the process of verifying that the resident's current medication list matches the physician's orders for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the main kitchen grout and coving were maintained in a sanitary and safe condition; 2. Ensure walk-in shelving was free of rust; and 3. Ensure food was properly stored, labeled, and dated in three of three unit kitchenettes. Findings include: 1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 1-2 Definitions 1-201 Applicability and Terms Defined 1-201.10 Statement of Application and Listing of Terms. Easily Cleanable. (1) Easily cleanable means a characteristic of a surface that: (a) Allows effective removal of soil by normal cleaning methods; (b) Is dependent on the material, design, construction, and installation of the surface; and (c) Varies with the likelihood of the surface's role in introducing pathogenic or toxigenic agents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings include: Review of the Pest Control Service Inspection Reports, indicated: -4/3/24: 2 out of 6 inspected exterior bait stations showed activity -10/2/24: 6 out of 6 inspected exterior bait stations showed activity -3/21/25: 5 out of 6 inspected exterior bait stations showed activity -4/2/25: 3 out of 6 inspected exterior bait stations showed activity -5/15/25: 1 out of 6 inspected exterior bait stations showed activity On 5/15/25 at 1:23 P.M., the surveyor observed the dumpster and refuse area. The surveyor observed a large pile of stacked wood pallets, piled up to the top of a wooden fence panel. During an interview on 5/15/25 at 1:25 P.M., the interim Food Service Director said the pallets had been there for a while and was not sure what the plan for them was. During an interview on 5/15/25 at 1:36 P.M., the Director of Maintenance said the pallets had been there since COVID and because the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resources were utilized to ensure mechanical equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. Findings include: Review of the Town Food Inspection Report, dated 2/6/25, indicated same issue again is with walk-in freezer. Ice is now on boxes and boxes are not allowed to be contaminated with anything. Needs to be addressed again. Review of the Town Food Inspection Report follow up visit, dated 3/24/25, indicated checked walk-in freezer and girls are keeping up with it, but ice is still accumulating on left side and ceiling and on products. On 5/14/25 at 8:30 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the main kitchen: walk-in freezer with: -condensation on the exterior of the freezer door window; -freezer door seal detached from the top right corner of the freezer door - the length…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain an infection prevention and control program which included a complete and accurate system of surveillance to identify any trends or potential infections; 2. Review and document laboratory results for a total of 71 patients on two out of two units swabbed for Group A Streptococcus, as a measure of surveillance after three identified residents who resided in the facility tested positive; 3. Ensure proper hand hygiene was completed prior to meals for residents eating in the first floor dining area; 4. Ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized for Resident #27, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), while providing direct care; 5. Follow proper hand hygiene standards while administering an injection to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#47 and #68) were treated with dignity and respect, in a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To engage with Resident #47 using their preferred name (their first name shortened to a nickname), after being informed of the preferred name by the family; and 2. To provide a privacy bag to cover the urinary catheter bag of Resident #68. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated November 2017, indicated the following: -recognizing each resident as an individual, we identify and meet those needs in a resident-centered environment -care plans reflect resident preferences Resident #47 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder with a history of mental illness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/11/25, indicated Resident #47 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating he/she was cognitively intact and the Resident had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives for one Resident (#116), out of total sample of 23 residents, were executed in accordance with the Resident's wishes, specifically, their Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST medical order form that relays instructions between health professionals about a patient's care based on an individual's right to accept or refuse medical treatment). Findings include: The Facility does not have a policy for Advanced Directive formulation. Resident #116 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/25, indicated Resident #116 scored 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam which indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. On 05/14/25 at 01:54 P.M., the surveyor and Unit Manager #3 reviewed Resident #116's electronic medical record which indicated that the Resident's code status was Full Code. Review of the paper record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Resident's physician and activated Health Care Proxy (HCP) about a significant medication error so as to re-evaluate the potential need to alter the treatment plan for one Resident (#76), from a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the primary physician and health care proxy of a medication reconciliation error resulting in Resident #76 receiving nine additional doses of Eliquis (apixaban) (an anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent blood clots). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Error Reporting, dated April 2015, indicated, but was not limited to the following: -A medication error is any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use, which the medication is in the control of the health care professional. -A medication error report is to be completed immediately after an error is discovered to ensure proper resident/patient follow-up.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a comfortable and homelike dining experience in one of three dining rooms; and 2. Repair a water damaged wall area around a built-in wall unit air conditioner. Findings include: 1. During dining observations throughout the survey on 5/14/25, 5/15/25, and 5/16/25, surveyors observed the following: On 5/14/25 from 8:15 A.M. through 8:30 A.M., the surveyor observed the third-floor dining room: -Five residents were seated at one round folding table (different than the other five tables), no tablecloth, all breakfast meals were served on trays -Seven out of 13 residents were served from the first meal truck and all meals were served on the meal trays -None of the six tables had tablecloths -At 8:38 A.M., the remaining six residents received their breakfast meal with the plates, bowls and cups remaining on the meal trays. On 5/14/25 at 12:30 P.M., the surveyor observed the third-floor unit dining room. All six tables had maroon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards for three Residents (#64, #24, #23), of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #64, to ensure the Resident's inhaler and allergy nasal spray medications were stored securely; 2. For Resident #24, to ensure the Resident's nasal spray medication was stored securely; and 3. For Resident #23, to ensure the Resident's inhaler medication was stored securely. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Bedside medication storage is permitted for residents who wish to self-administer medications, upon the written order of the prescriber and once self-administration skills have been assessed and deemed appropriate in the judgment of the facility's interdisciplinary resident assessment team. - The manner of storage prevents access by other residents. 1. Resident #64 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included antibiotic use protocols and monitoring of antibiotic use in accordance with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Prevention Program - Antibiotic Stewardship, revised 3/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's infection prevention and control program. The goal of this program is to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use, improve patient care outcomes and reduce possible consequences of antimicrobial use. - The facility will establish an antimicrobial stewardship team (AMS) dedicated to improving antimicrobial use. - The core members of the AMS team will include, but not be limited to the Medical Director, Pharmacy Consultant, Director of Nurses (DON), and Infection Preventionist (IP). - The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#23 and #87), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations, were screened for eligibility to receive the recommended pneumococcal vaccination, residents/residents' representatives were educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine, and were offered and administered (if applicable) the vaccine in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #23, to ensure the Resident's medical record included documentation that indicated the Resident/Resident's Representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal vaccination and declined vaccination; and 2. For Resident #87, to ensure the Resident's medical record included documentation that indicated the Resident/Resident's Representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal vaccination and either consented to receive or refused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who during the night shift (11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.) on 03/07/25 into 03/08/25 had an unwitnessed fall, and was found in the bathroom kneeling on the floor, the Facility failed to ensure the Provider and Family Member #1, were notified. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Condition: Significant Change, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -staff will communicate with the physician, resident/patient, and family regarding changes in condition to provide timely communication of resident/patient status change which is essential to quality care management - the physician, resident/patient and/or responsible party will be notified by the nurse in the event of a change in condition -this notification shall be documented in the clinical record Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Falls Management, dated as reviewed/revised April 2024 indicated the following: -anytime a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred -post fall, once a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who during the night shift (11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.) on 03/07/25 into 03/08/25 was found on the bathroom floor after an unwitnessed fall by nursing staff, the facility failed to ensure he/she was provided care and services that met professional standards of nursing practice, when although Nurse #1 said she assessed Resident #1 after the incident, she did not document it, did not complete an incident report or write a progress note, and did not report the unwitnessed fall to the oncoming shift nurse, so he/she could be monitored. Findings include: Standard Reference: Standard of Practice Reference: Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of registered nurse and practical nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a registered nurse and practical nurse bear full responsibility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain an infection prevention and control program which included a complete and accurate system of surveillance to identify any trends or potential infections; 2. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene in between each resident during a medication pass and did not touch the medications with their bare hands; 3. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene in between glove changes during a dressing change treatment for Resident #257; and 4. Ensure transmission based precautions (TBP) were implemented according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for Resident #21. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled The Infection Prevention Program, dated as revised October 2022, included but was not limited to the following: -This facility follows the professional standards set forth as recommended by the CDC/OSHA. The goal of the Infection Prevention Program is to prevent, recognize, and control, to the extent possible, the onset and spread of infection within the facility. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a resident group meeting, staff interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances and concerns from the Resident Council were documented to ensure they were acted upon timely and included the facility response and rationale for review with the Resident Council. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council, last revised 10/2015, indicated the following: - It is the policy of this home that the Recreation Department will provide support and assistance in the formation of a Resident Council. - The residents will have an opportunity to express their concerns or grievances, contribute ideas and make recommendations regarding the operation of the home. - Resident Council will meet monthly. - Maintain written minutes including residents in attendance, opening, adjournment times, discussions and/or actions that take place. - Notify Department Heads in writing of concerns that come up during the meeting. - Retain a copy of the resolutions that address each concern. - Retain minutes on file for a minimum of one (1) year. - Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean, comfortable, and homelike. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rooms and environment were maintained in good repair and homelike on 1 of 3 resident care units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Preventative Maintenance, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility's physical plant and equipment will be maintained through a program of preventative maintenance and prompt action to identified areas/items in need of repair. The Maintenance Director will follow all policies regarding routine periodic maintenance. On 3/22/24 at 10:00 A.M., the surveyor observed the window screens on the first floor at the end of both hallways to be broken and did not fit correctly in the window leaving gaps where the screen was bent between the glass and screen. On 3/27/24 at 1:56 P.M, the surveyor observed the first floor resident sitting area with wall molding separating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain safe and clean microwaves in three out of three kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code, a model for safeguarding public health and ensuring food is safe for consumption, indicated: 4-201.11 Equipment and Utensils. Equipment and utensils must be designed and constructed to be durable and capable of retaining their original characteristics so that such items can continue to fulfill their intended purpose for the duration of their life expectancy and to maintain their easy cleanability. If they cannot maintain their original characteristics, they may become difficult to clean, allowing for the harborage of pathogenic microorganisms . Equipment and utensils must be designed and constructed so that parts do not break and end up in food as foreign objects or present injury hazards to consumers. On 3/27/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Complete antibiotic usage audit tools, which are used to track, report, and evaluate antibiotic prescribing patterns in accordance with the Antibiotic Stewardship Program; and 2. Ensure antibiotics prescribed are necessary for one Resident #40. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, dated as revised October 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to treat only symptomatic infections meeting criteria, and to promote antibiotic stewardship to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use, improve patient care outcomes and reduce possible consequences of antimicrobial use. -The facility will establish an antimicrobial stewardship team dedicated to improving antimicrobial use. -When symptoms of an infection are documented, the following measures will be implemented: Symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen walk-in freezer was maintained in safe operating condition. Findings include: On 3/26/24 at 8:35 A.M., the surveyor observed the walk-in freezer, located in the main kitchen, to have frost accumulation on the bottom of the window on the outside of the door. The surveyor was able to pull open the freezer door without unlatching it. The surveyor observed the inside of the walk-in freezer to have shaved ice on the floor immediately inside the door. In addition, the surveyor observed ice accumulation on the floor below the back wall, on English muffins located below the cooling fan, and on two roasting pans covered with aluminum foil. The surveyor observed a block of ice with a direct dripping from the cooling fan. The door handle for the freezer did not latch and the door did not close all the way. On 3/28/24 at 10:55 A.M., the surveyor inspected the walk-in freezer with the Food Service Director and observed the outside window of the freezer to have an increased accumulation of ice; the inside of the freezer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for two Residents (#257 and #259) for their history of substance abuse, out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care plan - Baseline, dated as revised in November 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - a baseline care plan is developed within 48 hours of admission based on information obtained during the admission process as a guide for care until the comprehensive care plan is developed. 1. Resident #257 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with a diagnosis of alcohol abuse. Review of the most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 3/12/24, indicated Resident #257 was cognitively intact with a score of 15 out of 15. Review of the baseline care plans and current comprehensive care plans as of 3/27/24 failed to indicate a baseline care plan was developed to assist the Resident in managing his/her substance use disorder. 2. Resident #259 was admitted to the facility in March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop individualized, person-centered care plans regarding pain management for two Residents (#257 and #259), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled: Comprehensive Care Plans, dated as revised November 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the facility is committed to providing residents with all necessary care and services to enable them to achieve their highest quality of life - recognizing each resident as an individual, the facility will identify and meet those needs in a resident-centered environment - care plans are oriented toward preventing avoidable decline in clinical and functional levels, maintaining a specific level of function and reflect resident preferences - care plans are a combination of data from the hospital discharge record, physician data, evaluations performed by professionals, resident goals of treatment and acute/chronic events, behaviors and/or illnesses. - comprehensive care plans are developed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#41) was administered their medications in accordance with professional standards and the facility policy. The total sample was 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration - Oral, dated June 2015, indicated but was not limited to the following: - drugs for oral administration are available in tablets, capsules, syrups, elixirs, oils, liquids, suspensions, and powders. - the nurse is to stay with the resident until he/she has swallowed the medication. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including stroke, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. On 3/27/24 at 7:56 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 pour liquid protein 30 milliliters (mls) into a cup for Resident #41 as part of his/her morning medications. The nurse then left the cup of medication with the Resident after informing him/her what the medication was. She did not observe the Resident ingest the medication to ensure it was consumed by the Resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for two Residents (#33 and #65), out of a total sample of 21 residents, to ensure staff provided the necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #33, to ensure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask and tubing were stored properly in a sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination from germs and environmental debris; and 2. For Resident #65, to ensure CPAP mask and tubing were stored in a sanitary manner to decrease the risk of potential contamination. Findings include: Review of Lippincott's Manual of Nursing Procedures 9th edition, dated 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -When the CPAP therapy has been completed, follow these steps: -Clean and disinfect the equipment using a facility-approved disinfectant according to the manufacturer's instructions -Store it properly 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including acute and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective resident-centered pain management program to assist one Resident (#257) in meeting their individual pain goals, out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management, dated April 2015, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the facility is committed to assisting each resident attain or maintain their highest practicable well-being, by evaluating pain and using interventions to prevent pain from interfering with overall quality of life - in the evaluation the resident's perception of pain is always considered reality and the resident's goal of pain for pain management will be honored - the resident's acceptable level of pain will be determined by resident interview and evaluation - the facility will: assess potential for pain, recognize the onset or presence of pain, assess using a standardized scale, develop and implement interventions to pain management both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, use pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to consistently provide substance use disorder counselling and services for two Residents (#257 and #259), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Treatment Options for Residents with Substance Use Disorder, dated March 2024, included but was limited to: - the facility will offer appropriate individualized treatment for all residents living with the disease of addiction or with a history of substance use disorder - newly admitted residents with substance use disorder will be assessed by licensed substance use clinicians, or designee, and offered appropriate referrals as indicated, warranted, feasible and agreed upon - substance use clinicians, or designee, will provide resources to residents who request and/or accept referral to substance use treatment and will support/assist with initiating treatment - residents with substance use disorder and actively being treated as well as residents with a history of substance use disorder, will be offered behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to safely store medications on one out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secure when not in view of the licensed nurse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart, dated February 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility provides pharmaceutical services that are conducted in accordance with accepted ethical and professional standards of practice and that meet applicable Federal, State and Local Laws, rules and regulations -Medications are stored primarily in a locked mobile medication cart which is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel On 03/26/24 at 9:05 A.M., the surveyor observed the medication cart on first floor south side, in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], the cart was unlocked, the medications were unsecured, and there was no licensed nurse in the area. On 3/26/24 at 9:07 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory (lab) services were obtained for one Resident (#89), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the physician's plan to obtain a CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), HgbA1c (hemoglobin A1C), lipid panel, and TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone). Findings include: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses of diabetes and a history of a stroke with left sided hemi-paresis. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #89 was seen by the physician on 1/18/24 for generalized weakness and slow progressive decline. The Physician's Progress Note included a plan to check the CBC, CMP, HgbA1c, lipid panel and TSH. Review of the Physician Interim Orders indicated orders for the following labs were written: 1/18/24: Keppra level 2/12/24: Digoxin level, CBC, CMP, EKG Review of the medical record failed to indicate the CBC, CMP, HgbA1C, lipid panel or TSH were completed. During an interview on 3/28/24 at 10:17 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1.) Ensure that food was stored, prepared, and distributed under sanitary conditions; and 2.) Ensure three unit kitchenette refrigerators were maintained in a sanitary manner to store food and fluid. Findings include: 1. On 9/19/22 at 8:15 A.M., the surveyor observed the following sanitation concerns in the kitchen: *Walk-in freezer had two large containers of frozen vegetables left open and exposed to the air *Diet aide serving breakfast was not wearing a hairnet On 9/21/22 at 8:00 A.M., the surveyor entered the main kitchen and observed breakfast meal service. [NAME] #2 was observed serving breakfast. [NAME] #2 was observed leaving the tray line, turn to the stove and open the oven door with her gloved hand. [NAME] #2 picked up 4 pieces of French toast directly out of the oven, returned to the tray line and began serving again without changing her gloves or washing her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four Residents (#10, #214, #68, and #112) and implement a care plan for one Resident (#6), out of a total sample size of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed 1.) For Resident #10, to ensure staff developed a comprehensive care plan for the care and treatment of a pressure area to the left lateral foot; 2.) For Resident #214, to ensure staff developed a comprehensive care plan following a fall at the facility resulting in a facial laceration; 3.) For Residents #68 and #112, to ensure staff developed a comprehensive care plan for the use of psychotropic medications; and 4.) For Resident #6, to ensure staff implemented a care plan for fall interventions. Findings include: 1.) Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in August 2015 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Wound Care notes, dated 8/1/22, indicated the Resident had presented with a new wound to the left foot. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and review of food temperature logs, the facility failed to ensure that food and drink are palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Findings include: During an interview on 9/19/22 at 10:11 A.M., Resident #165 said the food is cold, especially the eggs. During an interview on 9/19/22 at 10:58 A.M., Resident #87 said the food is terrible, sometimes I don't know what it is. The Resident said sometimes he/she was hungry after meals because sometimes he/she did not eat. The Resident said the other day the meat had a lot of gristle and he/she could not eat it. During an interview on 9/19/22 at 11:34 A.M., Resident #70 said the food is horrible. The Resident said that he/she chokes a lot, so they give him/her peanut butter and jelly sandwich with all my meals because he/she can't eat certain foods. During an interview on 9/19/22 at 11:58 A.M., Resident #13 said the food is 50%. During an interview on 9/19/22 at 12:14 P.M., Resident #17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain personal equipment (wheelchair armrests) in good condition for five Residents (#87, #73, #55, #75, and #167), from a total sample of 25 Residents. Findings include: On 9/19/22 and 9/20/22 and throughout all days of survey (9/19/22 through 9/22/22), the following observations were made of residents' wheelchair armrests: On 9/19/22 at 10:30 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #75's wheelchair armrests covered in silver duct tape. Resident #75 said the armrests have been like this for a while. On 9/20/22 from 10:35 A.M. to 10:40 A.M., the surveyor observed: * Resident #73's left outer armrest with two open areas exposing padding. * Resident #167's right armrest had several cracked, rough areas and the back rest had a tear on the top. * Resident #55's wheelchair armrests had several cracked and rough surfaces. On 9/21/22 at 11:30 A.M., the surveyor observed that Resident #87's wheelchair armrests were badly cracked and rough to the touch. During an interview on 9/21/22 at 11:35 A.M., Resident #87…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care for one Resident (#16) following a hospitalization for aggressive behavior and a Resident to Staff altercation, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in December 2021 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, restlessness, agitation, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated June 2022, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15, indicating the Resident has moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident experienced delusions and physical and verbal behavioral symptoms towards others. Review of the medical record indicated the Resident had a physical altercation with a staff member in July 2022 that resulted in injury to the staff member and the Resident being sent to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. Review of the facility Incident Report, dated 7/20/22, indicated in July 2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Nurse #9 documented the required information in the medical record for the removal of a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line in accordance with professional standards of practice and the facility's policy for one Resident (#61) of one Residents with a PICC line, from a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Removal, dated January 2022, indicated was but not limited to the following: POLICY: *The licensed nurse will have documented education and competency in the management and removal of vascular access devices and will practice according to state regulations. PROCEDURE: 19. Documentation at a minimum: *Date/time *Reason for removal *Removed catheter length and condition of the catheter tip *Type of dressing applied *Resident's response to the removal *Comprehensive site assessment *Any complications encountered and interventions *Resident/caregiver education Resident #61 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards, through ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for one Resident (#67), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hemodialysis, dated 4/2015, indicated the following but was not limited to: - communication between the facility and the hemodialysis center will occur using a communication book/sheet that consists of: - vital signs - copy of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) - Any change of condition from last hemodialysis treatment - Documentation will be completed prior to dialysis treatment - The communication book/sheet will be reviewed upon return from dialysis Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses that include end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/2022, indicated the Resident was receiving dialysis services. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days, unless documented by the attending physician or prescribing practitioner that it is appropriate to extend beyond 14 days for one Resident (#61), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Management, dated 4/2015, indicated but was not limited to the following: POLICY: *Each resident's drug regimen will be free from necessary drugs. Administration of psychoactive medications will focus on the individual needs of the resident, and will be prescribed only when necessary and clinically indicated to treat specific conditions and symptoms as diagnoses and documented. Psychoactive medication management will include implementation of behavioral interventions, gradual dose reduction attempts, and adequate monitoring that complies with Federal and State guidelines. PROCEDURE: *Obtain physician's order for each psychoactive medication. Ensure that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to: 1.) Label medications and biologicals and properly store them, in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and 2.) Ensure medications were stored at the proper temperature to ensure their efficacy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room/Medication Cart Policy, dated 2/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility provides pharmaceutical services that are conducted in accordance with accepted ethical and professional standards of practice and that meet applicable Federal, State and Local Laws, rules and regulations. -Drugs requiring refrigeration are stored separately in a refrigerator that is used exclusively for medication and medication adjuncts. -Licensed personnel will be responsible to check expiration dates on ordered medications, house stock medications, and supplies. 1.) On 9/22/22 at 9:50 A.M., the Surveyor and Nurse #6 inspected the Second-floor medication cart. The surveyor opened the top drawer of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician/physician's assistant (PA) were notified promptly of the critical results of laboratory tests, which fell outside of the clinical reference range, for one Resident (#61), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Notification, dated 11/2016, indicated but was not limited to the following: *Promptly notify physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner of laboratory, radiology and other diagnostic services that fall outside of clinical reference ranges. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses that included diabetes. On 9/19/22 at approximately 3:15 P.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #5 answer the telephone and respond that Resident #61's blood glucose level was 35 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dl), (normal range 70-120 mg/dl). Review of the medical record indicated the Resident had blood work obtained on 9/19/22 at 8:15 A.M. that included a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) and Complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are complete, accurate, and systemically organized within accepted professional standards and practice for 2 out of 3 closed Resident records (#114 and #116) and one Resident (#22) record, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed 1.) For Resident #114 and Resident #116, to ensure they had a physician's order to discharge home with services; and 2.) For Resident #22, to ensure he/she had a physician's order to discontinue hospice services. Findings include: 1a.) Resident #114 was admitted in March 2022 with diagnoses including hypertension, atrial fibrillation, cerebral vascular disease, and dementia. Review of a Nursing Progress note, dated 6/28/22, indicated Resident #114 was discharged home with services. Review of the June 2022 Physician's Orders failed to indicate an order to discharge home. 1b.) Resident #116 was admitted in August 2022 with diagnoses including acute cholecystitis and calculus of gallbladder. Review of the Social Service's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and documentation review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions to prevent the potential spread of suspected Clostridioides difficile (C-diff; a bacterium which causes serious diarrheal infections) per the facility's policy for one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention Program, last updated 4/2022, included but was not limited to the following: - The program will promote the use of standard precautions for all resident care unless a resident has a known or suspected infectious agent (infected or colonized) including certain epidemiologically important pathogens, which may require additional control measures to effectively prevent transmission. - The program will prevent and control outbreaks and cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolated
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure rapid antigen testing was conducted in a manner that is consistent with current standards of practice established by State and Federal agencies to maintain proper infection control and ensure the validity of the test results. Findings include: Review of Binaxnow Covid-19 AG Card (PN 195-000) - Instruction for use, as indicated in the Department of Public Health Memorandum, dated 10/28/21 indicated the following: - Treat all specimens as potentially infectious. Follow universal precautions when handling samples, this kit and its contents. - Proper sample collection, storage, and transport are essential for correct results. - Inadequate or inappropriate sample collection, storage, and transport may yield false test results. - Solutions used to make the positive control swab are non-infectious. However, patient samples, controls, and test cards should be handled as though they could transmit disease. Observe established precautions against microbial hazards during use and disposal. -Test results are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to accurately update the nurse staffing plan to reflect the current needs of the facility upon completion of their annual assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as last revised 1/12/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Persons involved in completing the assessment: + Administrator + Director of Nurses (DON) + Medical Director + Governing Body Representative + Director Physical Plant + Director of Activities + Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) + Admissions Director - Resident Profile: + Number of residents licensed to provide care for: 120 beds + Average daily census: 80-85 + First Floor: 40 beds; long-term care + Second Floor: 40 beds; short term rehabilitation, COVID-19 isolation/quarantine + Third Floor: 40 beds; secure unit, memory care - Staffing Plan: + Licensed Nurses: one DON, one Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), four Unit Managers/Supervisors, one SDC, one Infection Preventionist Nurse + 1:20 Licensed Nurse ratio Days and Evenings + 1:40 Licensed Nurse ratio…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5AdviniaCare Orchard, LLCEast Providence, RI 1 of 5Civita Care BayviewWaterford, CT 1 of 5Civita Care NorthbridgeBridgeport, CT 1 of 5Civita Care Sheriden WoodsBristol, CT 1 of 5Lanessa Extended CareWebster, MA 1 of 5Marlborough Hills Rehabilitation & Health Care CenMarlborough, MA 1 of 5Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLowell, MA 1 of 5Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterHaverhill, MA 1 of 5Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterNorth Easton, MA 1 of 5Southshore Health Care CenterRockland, MA 1 of 5Wadsworth Glen Health Care And Rehabilitation CentMiddletown, CT 1 of 5Worcester Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5AdviniaCare Waterview Villas, LLCEast Providence, RI 2 of 5Berkshire Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterSandisfield, MA 2 of 5Cape Heritage Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSandwich, MA 2 of 5Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5Plymouth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterPlymouth, MA 2 of 5Southbridge Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSouthbridge, MA 2 of 5Webster Manor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWebster, MA 3 of 5Tremont Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterWareham, MA 4 of 5Civita Care MeadowbrookGranby, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA R LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/25/2012
CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2012
CURTIS, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
MOSIER, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE6%since 09/01/2012
REZENDES, LORRIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
SANTILLI, LAWRENCEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER74%since 05/04/2020
ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/25/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 11%Other / private 19%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$430per resident / day
operating cost
$13,063per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$386per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225338. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next