AdviniaCare Orchard, LLC
135 Tripps Lane, East Providence, RI 02915 · For profit - Corporation · 166 certified beds · (401) 438-2250 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
- inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $103,744 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.9% | 19.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.7% | 17.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.3% | 16.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.2% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.2% | 22.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.7% | 22.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 2.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 78.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.9% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.7% | 14.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.11 | 1.59 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.72 | 1.68 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 5.8–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 30.1 residents a day — about 18% occupied, or roughly 136 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 21 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible related to the storage and management of biohazardous waste (any material contaminated with infectious agents or potentially infectious substances that pose a risk to health, including blood and body fluids) and sharps (any instruments or devices with sharp points or edges that can puncture or cut skin, posing risks of injury and disease transmission). This failure resulted in unsecured, unlocked, and accessible biohazardous waste and sharps on four (4) of four (4) units observed, including a secured memory care unit, placing residents at risk for exposure to bloodborne pathogens, infectious disease, and physical injury. Findings are as follows:Review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/7/2026 alleged that trash and biohazardous waste were blocking the entire back side/entrance of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to properly store, secure, and dispose of biohazardous waste (any material contaminated with infectious agents or potentially infectious substances that pose a risk to others) and overfilled sharps containers (used for the safe disposal of used needles, syringes, and other sharp medical items to prevent needlestick injuries and the spread of infection) in unsecured and unlocked areas on four (4) of four (4) units observed, including a secured memory care unit. These failures placed residents at risk for exposure to bloodborne pathogens, infectious diseases, and physical harm. Findings are as follows:Review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from neglect for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who attempted suicide, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 9/9/2024 alleges that Resident ID #1 tried to commit suicide on 9/7/2024. S/he had a belt around his/her neck and the family was not informed. Review of a facility policy titled, Suicide Attempt or Threats last revised in November of 2019 states in part, In the event a resident/patient attempts or is threatening suicide: Take all allegations seriously. Ensure the resident's/patient's immediate safety. Place the resident on 1:1 [constant supervision]. The charge nurse will notify the supervisor and attending physician. The supervisor or charge nurse will notify nursing administration. A staff member will be assigned to stay with the resident/patient on a one-to-one basis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive adequate supervision for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who attempted suicide, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 9/9/2024 alleges that Resident ID #1 tried to commit suicide on 9/7/2024. S/he had a belt around his/her neck and the family was not informed. Review of a facility policy titled, Suicide Attempt or Threats last revised in November of 2019 states in part, In the event a resident/patient attempts or is threatening suicide: Take all allegations seriously. Ensure the resident's/patient's immediate safety. Place the resident on 1:1 [constant supervision]. The charge nurse will notify the supervisor and attending physician. The supervisor or charge nurse will notify nursing administration. A staff member will be assigned to stay with the resident/patient on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed who successfully eloped from the facility and for whom interventions and assessments were not implemented, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/18/2024 alleges that Resident ID #4 had eloped from the facility successfully twice. Review of the facility policy titled Elopement states in part, .Elopement is defined as the ability of a resident who is not capable of protecting himself or herself from harm to successfully leave the facility unsupervised and unnoticed and who may enter into harm's way . - The licensed nurse will conduct an elopement screen on admission, re-admission, annually, upon change of condition. Residents identified at risk for elopement will have their photo maintained in a confidential manner at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to a nurse transcribing an order for NPO (nothing by mouth) without a physician's order and discontinuing a medication without physician authorization for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #99. Additionally, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for blood sugar monitoring, and for 1 of 2 residents observed for wound care, Resident ID #11. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states: The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #99 was admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer) and mild protein calorie malnutrition. Record review revealed a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospice services, Resident ID #99. Additionally, the facility failed to follow physician's recommendations for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds, Resident IDs #8 and 330, and not following the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for the use of arm sleeves, Resident ID #82. Findings are as follows: 1a. Review of a facility policy titled, Comfort Measures dated April 2015 states in part, .The plan of care will include interventions developed to promote pain management and to address the actual and/or potential physical/emotional/spiritual comfort needs of the resident/patient. According to National Library of Medicine, Adult Dehydration, last updated 2022, indicated that dehydration may complicate other medical problems and may cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-07-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident is offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hydration, Resident ID #99. Findings are as follows: According to National Library of Medicine, Adult Dehydration, last updated 2022, indicated that dehydration may complicate other medical problems and may cause significant illness. A resident may appear with dark urine or decreased urine output and may be lethargic upon observation in severe cases of dehydration. Failure to treat dehydration in older adults may lead to significant mortality. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not have defined water intake recommendations, adults are encouraged to maintain between 2,000 - 3,000 milliliters per day. Review of an article published by Medical News Today, titled, How long you can live without water, states in part, .The body needs lots of water to carry out many essential functions, such as balancing the internal temperature and keeping cells…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-07-06 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for end-of-life care, Resident ID #99. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #99 was admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer) and mild protein calorie malnutrition. Record review of an order dated 6/22/2023 entered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff D, for NPO [nothing by mouth]. Further record review of the order dated 6/22/2023 for NPO entered by Staff D, was electronically signed through a web application by the resident's physician on 6/24/2023. During a surveyor interview on 6/27/2023 at 1:47 PM, and then again on 6/30/2023 at 9:06 AM with the resident's physician, he revealed that he did not give an order for the resident to be NPO. Additionally, he revealed that the order was digitally signed by him in a batch of orders. Furthermore, he indicated that the orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for the use of methadone (a medication prescribed to reduce cravings and withdrawals from opiates and to treat chronic and severe pain), Resident ID #330. Findings are as follows: Record review of an untitled facility medication reconciliation policy last revised August 2022, states in part, .This facility reconciles medication frequently throughout a resident's stay to ensure the resident is free of significant medication errors .medication reconciliation refers to the process of verifying the resident's current medication list matches the physician's orders for the purposes of providing the correct medications to the resident .medication reconciliation involves collaboration with the resident/representative and multiple disciplines .admission process .Compare orders to the hospital record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview if has been determined that the facility failed to promptly identify and intervene during an acute change in a resident's condition, related to a mental status change and a fall, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a change in condition, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled Condition: Significant Change states in part, .staff will communicate with the physician, resident/patient, and family regarding changes in condition to provide timely communication of resident/patient status change which is essential to quality care management . Review of a facility policy titled, Hypoglycemia- Clinical Management Of states in part, Hypoglycemia is defined as finger stick or serum glucose less than 60 mg./dl [milligram per deciliter] .if symptoms of a low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) are present, immediate intervention is necessary . Symptoms of hypoglycemia include, but are not limited to, lethargy, confusion, and a change in mental status. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the proper disposal and management of garbage, resulting in an accumulation of garbage at the back of the facility that obstructed exit routes and posed an immediate hazard to residents' safety. This failure placed residents at risk in the event of an emergency evacuation. The facility was found to be in past noncompliance.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/7/2026 alleged that large amounts of trash were blocking the entire back side of the facility. Further review of the complaint revealed that the accumulation of garbage obstructed exit doors, resulting in blocked fire exits for residents to use in the event of an emergency evacuation, posing an extreme risk and immediate hazard to resident safety.Record review of photographs obtained from the complainant, dated 1/7/2026 at 2:13 PM, revealed a significant accumulation of garbage at the back of the facility. The photographs showed multiple black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0837 — patternEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility's governing body failed to ensure the effective implementation and oversight of policies related to the management and operation of the facility. Specifically, the governing body failed to ensure the proper disposal and management of biohazardous waste and garbage, resulting in unsecured biohazardous waste stored in the facility and an accumulation of garbage at the back of the building that obstructed exit routes and posed an immediate hazard to the residents' safety.Findings are as follows: Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], states in part, Resources: The physical environment, services and other physical plant considerations are reviewed to ensure [the facility] meet the needs of our residents.assuring the safety and well-being for each resident.Waste management, hazardous waste management.Review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/7/2026 alleged that large amounts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, family, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who sustained a fall, Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:During the investigation of a community reported complaint on 9/24/2025, a surveyor interview was completed at 8:38 AM with Resident ID #2's family member. The family member alleged that Resident ID #2 fell on Friday, 9/19/2025, and was sent to the hospital on 9/21/2025, where s/he was diagnosed with a spinal fracture. The family further revealed that when they questioned the nurse on Sunday about the fall, the nurse revealed that there was no fall documented in Resident ID #2's medical record.Review of a policy titled, Fall Management states in part, .A fall risk evaluation will be conducted by the 'nurse on duty/supervisor' on any resident/patient sustaining a fall with or without injury.Post fall, once a resident/patient is clinically evaluated as being stable, vital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from your blood when your kidneys are failing) receive services consistent with professional standards of practice, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed who receive dialysis, Resident ID #s 1 and 3. Findings are as follows: According to the manufacturer's instructions for Sevelamer Carbonate states in part, .1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE Sevelamer Carbonate is indicated for the control of serum phosphorus [elevated levels can develop weak and broken bones and cause damage to blood vessels] in adults .with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. 2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION .administered orally with meals .12.1 By binding phosphate in the gastrointestinal tract and decreasing absorption, sevelamer carbonate lowers the phosphate concentration in the serum (serum phosphorus).1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide or obtain radiology services to meet the needs of its residents relative to obtaining a STAT (diagnostic or therapeutic procedure that is to be performed immediately) X-ray for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility reported incident dated 8/11/2025 revealed that Resident ID #1 sustained a fall on 8/9/2025 and was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a hip fracture.Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, anxiety, unsteadiness on feet and lack of coordination.Record review of a progress note dated 8/9/2025 authored by the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), Staff A, at 4:40 PM revealed that the resident sustained an unwitnessed fall. Additionally, it revealed that the resident complained of right groin pain and demonstrated a leg length discrepancy (right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of Rhode Island Food Code, 2022 Edition, Section 3-501.17 states in part, .READY -TO-EAT-TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 degrees Celsius or 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1 . During the initial tour of the kitchen on 6/23/2025 at approximately 8:20 AM in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the following was observed without a label or a date: In the walk-in refrigerator: - one 3 pounds (lbs.) bag containing potatoes. - seven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests. Findings are as follows: During the resident council meeting on 6/25/2025 at 10:00 AM, the residents reported the following: - Resident ID #117 complained that someone told him/her that there were cockroaches and ants in his/her room. - Resident ID #s 38 and 95 have seen ants eat their leftover food in their rooms. The following observations were made after the resident council meeting: - 6/25/2025 at 11:03 AM, ants were observed to be present in the rear stairwell. - 6/25/2025 at approximately 12:00 PM and 2:00 PM, ants were observed in the second-floor dining room. - 6/26/2025 at approximately 8:00 AM and 2:00 PM, ants were observed in the second-floor dining room. During a surveyor interview on 6/26/2025 at 2:49 PM with the covering Administrator, he revealed that the facility has not had pest control services since February of 2024. Additionally, he was unable to provide evidence that the facility is kept…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 3 of 4 shower rooms observed relative to safety rails (rails that provide a sturdy handhold to help users maintain balance and avoid slips and falls, especially on wet or slippery surfaces). Findings are as follows: 1a. During a surveyor interview on 6/24/2025 at approximately 1:15 PM with Resident ID #71, s/he stated that the shower rails are loose and when s/he went to stand in the shower the other day, the safety rail gave out. Record review revealed Resident ID #71 was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, lack of coordination and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the task documentation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to staff wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), for 1 of 1 resident observed on neutropenic precautions (a set of measures taken to prevent infections for individuals with neutropenia, a condition where there is an abnormally low number of white blood cells, increasing the risk of infection), Resident ID #2, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was readmitted to the facility with an order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP; infection control measures which require putting on a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities), Resident ID #43. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Neutropenic Precautions states in part, .if an order is received to place a resident on neutropenic precautions, the nurse will clarify what restrictions are necessary .staff members will wear a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in a safe operating condition for the exhaust hood in the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 96 Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations 2011 Edition section 11.2 states in part, .11.2.1* Maintenance of the fire-extinguishing systems and listed exhaust hoods containing a constant or fire-activated water system that is listed to extinguish a fire in the grease removal devices, hood exhaust plenums, and exhaust ducts shall be made by properly trained, qualified, and certified person (s) acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction at least every 6 months . During a surveyor observation of the main kitchen on 6/23/2025 at 8:20 AM revealed that the exhaust hood over the stove was last cleaned on 6/26/2024. The next required semiannual cleaning would have been due on 12/26/2024, which indicates the cleaning was past due by more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to have handrails securely affixed to the walls on 3 of 4 units in the facility. Findings are as follows: Surveyor observations on 6/23/2025 revealed the following handrails were not securely affixed to the wall: 1. [NAME] Unit - The handrail between rooms A7 and A9 was falling off the wall, with the screws exposed. - The handrail on right side of the door of room A9 was loose. Resident ID #12 was observed utilizing the handrails in the hallway while self-propelling in a wheelchair to get to his/her room. During a surveyor interview on 6/23/2025 at 2:58 PM with Nursing Assistant, Staff C, she acknowledged that the above-mentioned handrails were loose and not securely affixed to the wall. During a surveyor interview on 6/23/2025 at 3:01 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff D, she revealed that she was aware of the broken handrail between rooms A7 and A9, and has notified the maintenance department about it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain, Resident ID #330. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/25/2025 indicates the resident reported to the state surveyor s/he was abused by the Nurse Practitioner (NP), Staff H, related to changes in his/her medications. Record review of an untitled facility policy relative to medication reconciliation, last revised in August of 2022, states in part, .This facility reconciles medication frequently throughout a resident's stay to ensure the resident is free of significant medication errors .medication reconciliation refers to the process of verifying the resident's current medication list matches the physician's orders for the purposes of providing the correct medications to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an order for methadone (a medication prescribed to reduce cravings and withdrawals from opiates and to treat chronic and severe pain), Resident ID #330. Findings are as follows: Record review of an untitled facility policy relative to medication reconciliation, last revised in August of 2022 states in part, .This facility reconciles medication .to ensure that the resident is free of any significant medication errors .'Medication reconciliation' refers to the process of verifying that the resident's current medication list matches the physician's orders for the purposes of providing the correct medications to the resident .Medication reconciliation involves . multiple disciplines,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality, relative to following a physician's order to obtain daily weights for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients . Record review revealed a physician's order with a start date of 3/27/2025 for the resident to be weighed daily. Record review failed to reveal evidence of documented weights from 3/28/2025 through 4/1/2025. Additional, record review failed to reveal evidence that the physician was notified of the missed weights. During a surveyor interview on 4/2/2025 at approximately 11:30 AM, with the DNS she was unable to provide evidence that daily weights were obtained for Resident ID #1 from 3/28/2025 through 4/1/2025.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, surveyor observation, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who had orders for a therapeutic diet, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure and diastolic heart failure (when the left ventricle of the heart becomes stiff and does not beat properly). Record review of a physician order with a start date of 3/26/2025 revealed a Low Sodium Diet (2-4 grams of Sodium) diet. During a surveyor observation of the resident on 4/2/2025 at approximately 12:30 PM, revealed that the lunch meal that was served to the resident contained a double portion of ham. Record review of the tray ticket that was on the resident's tray revealed the following in part: - Regular Texture, Low Sodium - Notes: Double Portions - No Ham During a surveyor interview on 4/2/2025 at approximately 2:00 PM with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a fluid restriction and for a complete and accurate medical record, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: 1a. Record review of a facility policy titled, Nursing Policy & Procedure Manual, April 2015 reads in part maintain accurate intake and output and no water pitchers are to be left at the bedside. Record review for Resident ID #1 revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diastolic congestive heart failure (when the left ventricle of the heart becomes stiff and does not beat properly) and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Record review revealed a physician order dated 3/26/2025 for a fluid restriction of 2000 milliliters (ml) daily, to be as administered on the following nursing shifts: - 11:00 PM -7:00 AM 290 ml - 7:00 AM -3:00 PM 440 ml - 3:00 PM -11:00 440 ml -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, relative to a cracked glass panel on the inner door of the facility's entrance. Findings are as follows: Surveyor observation on 4/2/2025 at approximately 12:30 PM, revealed that upon entering the facility, the lower glass panel of the main vestibule's inner door had approximately eight one foot by one-foot cracked glass segments. Further observation revealed that the cracked glass segments were covered with white medical tape. During a surveyor interview on 4/2/2025 at 2:00 PM with the Director of Nursing Services, she acknowledged the damage to the door. Additionally, she indicated that the damage occurred approximately three to four weeks ago. Furthermore, she was unable to provide evidence of a plan to repair the door.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area directly from each resident's bedside for 4 of 4 units reviewed, affecting Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 3/24/2025 alleged that 23 residents do not have functioning call lights, and instead utilize a hand bell as an alternative. Additionally, the report alleged that this issue has been ongoing for months posing concerns for the safety of the residents. During a surveyor interview on 3/26/2025 at 9:40 AM and 10:40 AM with the Director of Nursing Services, she revealed that approximately 30 residents do not have functioning call lights and instead, they are provided with hand bells to communicate their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to X-ray orders, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/27/2024, alleges that the resident fell, experienced increased pain, and impaired mobility. New orders were given by the provider for x-rays. The resident was subsequently sent out to the hospital and was diagnosed with two new fractures to his/her back. According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, which states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physicians' orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was a new admission, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, which states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, urinary tract infection (UTI) and dementia. Review of the hospital Continuity of Care- Post-Acute Facility document dated 10/9/2024, revealed an order for cephalexin (Keflex-an antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) twice a day for 2 days with instructions to contact the provider to ask if this medication should be continued. Review of a nursing admission note dated 10/9/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, who has an actual pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/27/2024 alleges that Resident ID #1 was found to have concerns with the status of his/her left lateral lower leg wound while being evaluated in the Emergency Department of an acute care hospital. Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sepsis, pressure injuries to the left lateral lower leg, left buttocks, right great toe, osteomyelitis (bone infection) and muscle wasting. Record review of the facility's contracted Wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to prepare, store, and distribute food according to professional standards of food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and 3 of 4 nourishment areas observed. Findings are as follows: 1a. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 4-601.11 states in part, (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch . During the initial tour of the main kitchen with the [NAME] Supervisor on 6/24/2024 at 8:45 AM, the following was observed: - One of three chef's knives with dried brown food matter on the blade - The blade of the countertop can opener was covered in a black, sticky residue During a surveyor interview with the [NAME] Supervisor immediately following the above observation, she acknowledged that the above items were dirty and needed to be cleaned. 1b. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 3-501.17 states in part, .(B)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections due to the facility's failure to utilize appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes), for 4 of 8 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 84, 28, 42, and 163. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct appropriate infection control practices relative to the handling of soiled linen. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy states in part, .implement enhanced barrier precautions for preventing transmission of novel or targeted multidrug-resistant organisms .MDROs are organisms that are resistant to all or most antibiotics .MRDOs may include, but are not limited to: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) .ESBL [Extended Spectrum Beta Lactimase]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #45. Findings are as follows: According to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 2/2023, .Abuse is the willful infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain .Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm . Resident to Resident Abuse of Any Type A resident to resident altercation should be reviewed as a potential situation of abuse .Also, when investigating an allegation of abuse between residents, the surveyor should not automatically assume that abuse did not occur, especially in cases where either or both residents have a cognitive impairment or mental disorder. Having a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of practice relative to following physicians orders for 2 of 4 residents reviewed relative to obtaining weekly weights, Resident ID #s 53 and 96. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #53 was re-admitted to the facility in May of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dysphagia and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 5/2/2024 with a start date of 5/6/2024 for weekly weights. Record review of the documented weights revealed the following: 5/7/2024 123.4 lbs. (pounds) 5/14/2024 not obtained 5/21/2024 not obtained 5/27/2024 123.3 lbs. 6/3/2024 not obtained Record review of the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a history of a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), Resident ID # 36. Findings are as follows: According to Nursing Health Assessment: A clinical Judgement Approach 4th edition, 2023 published by Wolters Kluwer, it has been revealed that characteristics of a Deep Vein Thrombosis, (DVT) also known as a blood clot, include, but are not limited to, pain and swelling at the site. Review of the facility policy titled, Condition: Significant Change states in part, .Staff will communicate with the physician .regarding changes in condition to provide timely communication of resident/patient status change which is essential to quality care management . Record review revealed Resident ID #36 was readmitted to the facility in May of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin or underlying tissue due to pressure), Resident ID #42. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #42 was admitted to the facility in January of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, and pressure ulcers to the coccyx (tail bone), and left heel. Record review revealed a physician's treatment order dated 6/14/2024 which states in part, .Skin prep periwound [area around the wound]. Apply medihoney f/b [follwed-by] calcium alginate [an absorbent dressing] and cover with foam dressing .Location: left heel every evening shift . Record review revealed a physician's treatment order dated 6/19/2024 which states .Pat dry. Apply medihoney and bordered foam dressing .Location: coccyx [every]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum) receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident ID #36. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled Hemodialysis states in part, .To provide comprehensive care to residents/patients .Communication between the facility and the hemodialysis center will occur using a communication book/sheet that consists of .Any change of condition from last hemodialysis treatment . Record review revealed Resident ID #36 was readmitted to the facility in May of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute kidney failure and chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe). Record review of a care plan last revised on 6/3/2024 revealed, the resident has a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease and started on dialysis. Further review revealed an intervention including, but not limited to, monitor lab…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every nurse aide (nursing assistant; NA), at least once every 12 months, for 4 of 7 NA personnel records reviewed, Staff F, G, H, I. Findings are as follows: Record review of the personnel files failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed for the following NAs: -Staff F, Date of hire 11/18/2022 -Staff G, Date of hire 1/21/2020 -Staff H, Date of hire 1/30/2013 -Staff I, Date of hire 9/22/2020 During a surveyor interview with the Director of Nursing Services on 6/26/2024 at 10:45 AM, she was unable to provide evidence of a completed performance evaluation within the last 12 months for the above-mentioned employees.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident ID #s 22 and 97. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy titled, Drug Regimen Review-Monthly states in part, .The attending Physician or licensed designee shall respond to the Drug Regimen Review within 7-14 days or more promptly, whenever possible . 1a. Review of the 4/9/2024 pharmacy recommendations for Resident ID #22 revealed a recommendation to reduce the resident's Pravastatin (a medication used to treat high cholesterol) from 20 milligrams (mg) to 10 mg. Additionally, it revealed that the recommendation was not signed by the provider until 6/20/2024. In addition, the recommendation had not been implemented until it was brought to the facility's attention by the surveyor, indicating that it had been over 2 months since the recommendation was made. 1 b. Review of the 6/10/2024 pharmacy recommendations for Resident ID #22 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0655 — widespreadCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of a resident's admission, that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for 3 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident ID #s 1, 2, and 3. Findings are as follows: According to the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP- Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, revised on 2/3/2023, §483.21(a)(1) The facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan must- (i) Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. (ii) Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to- (A) Initial goals based on admission orders. (B) Physician orders. (C) Dietary orders. (D) Therapy services. (E) Social services. (F) PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations, record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity, and is cared for in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life relative to assistance with eating during meals for 1 of 1 hospice resident reviewed, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/27/2023 alleges in part, .patients .called nursing staff for [his/her] roommate who had woken up hungry. Apparently, the roommate was sleeping when dinner was served, and staff didn't save [his/her] dinner or wake [him/her] to eat . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke) and mild cognitive impairment. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 hospice resident reviewed for the breakfast meal, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/27/2023 alleges in part, .patients .called nursing staff for [his/her] roommate who had woken up hungry. Apparently, the roommate was sleeping when dinner was served, and staff didn't save [his/her] dinner or wake [him/her] to eat . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke) and mild cognitive impairment. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident requires extensive assistance of one staff member for eating. Surveyor observations on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review reveals the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2021 with diagnoses to include, but not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a low level of oxygen in the blood) and hypercapnia (a higher than normal level of carbon dioxide in the blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 indicating that the resident is cognitively intact. It further revealed that the resident requires 2+ person assist for bed mobility, including turning side to side, and positioning while in bed. Record review of the resident's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for showers, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/5/2023 alleged, that the resident .wasn't being washed well and certain areas were even rarely being washed . Review of the facility's policy titled SHOWERS states in part, Resident .will receive a shower .as desired . Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in August of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, morbid obesity and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease). Record review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15 out of 15, indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents relative to smoking for 4 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 26, 78, 103, 112; 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to the water temperature for bathing, Resident ID #55; 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to wandering, Resident ID #5; and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for supervision while eating, Resident ID #8. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Smoking states in part, .Smoking will take place under the supervision of a staff member .All cigarettes, igniting and smoking materials will be kept in a secure location designated at the facility, residents are not permitted to retain such items .Smoking will take place under the supervision of a staff member. The staff member will have the responsibility of lighting all cigarettes. a) Record review for Resident ID #103 revealed s/he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-06 · tag F0699 — widespreadProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences for 5 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 5, 11, 50, 76 and 86. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled, Trauma Informed Care states in part, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure resident's who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice .4. Documentation regarding the resident's psychosocial well-being including their response to stressful life events/trauma and coping mechanisms will be reflected in the initial Social Service Assessment and/or social service progress notes .5.a trauma informed care plan will be documented in the resident's medical record by social service . 1a) Record review revealed Resident ID #5 was admitted to the facility in March of 2018…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, served and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to the main kitchen and nursing unit kitchenettes. Findings are as follows: 1a. Record review of the manufacturer's instructions for the use of Ready Care Strawberry and Vanilla shakes reads in part .once thawed, refrigerate up to fourteen days . During a surveyor observation on 6/29/2023 at approximately 12:50 PM the refrigerator located on the [NAME] Drive nursing unit revealed eight strawberry shakes without a use by date. During a surveyor observation on 6/29/2023 at approximately 12:55 PM the refrigerator located on the [NAME] Avenue nursing unit revealed four strawberry and eight vanilla shakes without a use by date. An additional surveyor observation on 6/29/2023 at approximately 1:00 PM on the [NAME] Drive nursing unit, a medication cart had a opened eight-ounce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to the handling of a multi-use glucometer for 2 of 2 residents observed, Resident ID #s 333 and 8; and 1 of 1 residents reviewed, Resident ID #7, with a positive wound culture for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) who was not on proper precautions, and relative to improper technique for a clean dressing change. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the Center for Disease Control frequently asked questions for providers safety blood glucose monitoring guidance for providers states, .FDA [Federal Drug Administration] has recently released guidance for manufacturers regarding appropriate products and procedures for cleaning and disinfection of blood glucose meters .The disinfection solvent you choose should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident, staff, and resident representative interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 4 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter, Resident ID #57. Findings are as follows: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument Manual v1.17.1 dated October of 2019, states in part, Indwelling catheters should not be used unless there is valid medical justification. Assessment should include consideration of the risk and benefits of an indwelling catheter, the anticipated duration of use, and consideration of complications resulting from the use of an indwelling catheter. Complications can include an increased risk of urinary tract infection [UTI] .Incontinence also may lead to the potentially troubling use of indwelling catheters, which can increase the risk of life threatening infections .Because of the risk of substantial complications with the use of indwelling urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 3 residents observed with medications at bedside, Resident ID #74. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility's policy and procedure titled, Self-Administration of Medication states in part, .If the resident elects to self-administer his/her own medications, an evaluation of their cognitive, physical and visual ability to perform this task is conducted to ensure accurate and safe medication management .Upon admission, readmission, annually, quarterly and change of condition, provide the resident/responsible party with a two-part document entitled SELF-ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICATIONS INFORMED CONSENT AND EVALUATION .Mark the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for each medication being self-administered for daily compliance monitoring purposes. (Indicate that the resident has self-administered) .If there is a change in the resident's status, re-evaluate his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 1 resident assessed for physical restraints/alarms, Resident ID #5, 1 of 1 resident assessed for weight gain; Resident ID #36, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for special treatment/procedures, Resident ID #79. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #5 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in September of 2019 with diagnoses that includes, but are not limited, to schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder) and borderline personality disorder. During a surveyor observation on 6/27/2023 at approximately 11:30 AM, a wander guard bracelet was observed on his/her wheelchair. Record review of a Treatment Administration Record dated 6/1/2023, through 6/27/2023, revealed the function of the wander guard was checked daily. Record review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section P,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives proper treatment to maintain vision abilities for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in September of 2019 with diagnosis including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. During a surveyor interview with the resident on 6/26/2023 at 1:21 PM, s/he revealed that his/her eyeglasses were broken. Record review of the resident's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed that s/he was coded as, yes for needing corrective lenses (contacts, glasses, or magnifying glass). Record review of the progress note written by the Social Worker, Staff I, on 5/16/2023 revealed that the resident's problem with glasses has been brought to her attention that day. Further review revealed that it was to be followed up with the facility's nurse secretary in the morning. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for care related to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PICCs, Resident ID #330. Findings are as follows: According to an article in the Journal of Infusion Nursing dated 2021, states in part, .1. During the initial flush, slowly aspirate the VAD [Vascular Access Device] for free-flowing blood return that is the color and consistency of whole blood, an important component of assessing catheter function prior to administration of medications and solutions . Record review of a facility provided document titled, Infusion Therapy Nursing Manual states in part, .10 .Attach flushing agent and flush and confirm VAD patency by ease of flushing and verifying a brisk blood return is observed upon aspiration . Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, osteomyelitis (bone infection) and local infection of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 6 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 3 resident rooms reviewed relative to medication storage for self-administration, Resident ID #74. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration and Documentation-General, states in part, .12. Administers medication at the time it is prepared. (Never pre-pours medications.) . 1. During a surveyor observation on 6/28/2023 at 9:01 AM of Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff O during the medication administration task, revealed a clear medication cup within the top drawer of the medication cart labeled, 23B containing 2 pink, oblong tablets and 1 white, oblong tablet. Staff O revealed she found the cup with the 3 medication tablets in the medication cart that morning and was not the individual that pre-poured the medication. She further revealed that she was unsure what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations and staff interviews between 1/22/2026 and 1/23/2026, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for all residents, staff, and the public. Active water leaks from the roof penetrated ceiling tiles and electrical fixtures on the second floor, causing brown water to pool on floors, collect in hallways accessible to cognitively impaired residents, and infiltrate the fire alarm panel. Despite awareness from maintenance, administration, and operations staff, no effective mitigation measures were implemented. These failures resulted in slippery, hazardous conditions, compromised life safety systems, and necessitated an evacuation directed by The Rhode Island Department of Health, placing 125 residents at immediate risk for serious harm or death.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) on 1/22/2026 alleged that the facility's roof was leaking and a large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-26 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff, and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey in a readily accessible area for the residents, staff, and public. Findings are as follows: During the resident council task on 6/24/2024 at 12:37 PM, the residents stated that they were aware of the State Inspection results but stated concerns about having to access to it. During a surveyor observation on 6/25/2024 at 10:00 AM, a sign near the front desk states Department of Health Survey Book Available Upon Request in Receptionist office. Review of the facility's survey results binder revealed that the last entry was from a survey conducted in December of 2023, and did not include the most recent survey results from April of 2024. During a surveyor interview with the Regional Director of Clinical Services on 6/25/2024 at 4:38 PM, she revealed that the binder was not updated to include the most recent surveys for the year of 2024. She further indicated that the survey results binder should be updated and placed in a readily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$103,744 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $23,485 — penalty dated 2026-01-12
- $25,485 — penalty dated 2026-01-12
- $23,923 — penalty dated 2024-09-12
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-04-23
- $14,050 — penalty dated 2024-02-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 09/30/2013 |
| MOSIER, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 7% | since 09/30/2013 |
| SANTILLI, LAWRENCE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 68% | since 07/01/2020 |
| ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/30/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in RI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415059. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.