No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Worcester Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

119 Providence Street, Worcester, MA 01604 · For profit - Partnership · 160 certified beds · (508) 860-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 860-5000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$71,392 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $71,392 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-02)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10 Winthrop St · (508) 753-2240 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
220 Grafton St · (508) 755-4196 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
The Store0.3 mi
88 Providence St · (508) 753-9015 · Call to confirm hours
Park
150 Vernon St · (508) 799-1190 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.5%16.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.1%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.2%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.5%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.7%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.0%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table34.1%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.6%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.2%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%11.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.341.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.761.501.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
24.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 24.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.8%CMS range 20.8–45.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 9.2–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge24.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge12.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge24.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 5.0–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
23.5%
Total nursing turnover
46.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 131.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-20)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had limited mobility, and preferred to stay in bed, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with adequate preventative measures to maintain his/her safety in an effort to prevent incidents/accidents resulting in serious injury, when he/she sustained burns from food that had been reheated in the microwave by staff. On 09/01/23, Resident #1 asked a staff member to reheat his/her soup, after the staff member reheated the soup in the microwave, she did not check the temperature of the soup, per facility guidelines, before bringing it back to Resident #1. The soup spilled onto Resident #1, and he/she sustained second degree (partial thickness, involves both the first and second layer of skin and appears red, blistered, and maybe swollen or painful) burns to the left side of his/her neck and shoulder extending to his/her left upper back, he/she required treatments and monitoring of the burn areas by nursing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an unwitnessed fall and an episode of emesis (vomiting) during the 11:00 P.M. to 07:00 A.M. shift, and then experienced a decline in condition, the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified the Provider in a timely manner, as required.Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Acute Condition: Significant Change, dated April 2015 indicated: - The nurse will notify the residents' attending physician or physician on call when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in July 2024, diagnoses included diabetes, difficulty walking, sleep apnea and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Facility's Investigation Report, dated 9/22/25, indicated that Resident #1 was found by Nursing staff on the floor of his/her room lying in emesis at approximately 2:00 A.M., was assessed by Nurse #1 and found to be at his/her baseline with no complaints of pain and was placed back into bed. The Report further indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#133) out of a total sample of 27 residents, was afforded the ability to review/sign documents pertaining to his/her medical care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #133, who was identified as his/her own person and was able to make his/her own decisions, was able to review and sign documentation relative to Advanced Directives (life sustaining measures that can be taken when a person's heart stops or they fail to breathe on their own), psychotropic medication, vaccination education, and ancillary services that could be provided while at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled, admission Procedure, last reviewed April 2005, indicated: -Prior to or upon admission the Admissions Coordinator will provide each resident and/or responsible party with written information regarding the resident's rights under state law to make decisions regarding his or her medical care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate access to the call light for one Resident (#88) out of a total sample size of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #88, the facility staff failed to place the Resident's call light within his/her reach, putting Resident #88 at risk of falls, and being unable to request staff assistance when needed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights, undated, indicated Residents have the right: -To have [their] personal preferences reasonably accommodated. -To have all reasonable requests responded to promptly. Review of the facility policy titled, Call Lights; Use Of, dated April 2015, indicated: -All facility resident/patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within his/her reach when unattended. -Answer all call lights, promptly whether or not you are assigned to the resident/patient. -Answer all call lights, in a prompt, calm, courteous manner. -When providing care to residents/patients be sure to position the call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that assistive devices to maintain vision were acquired for one Resident (#118) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #118, the facility failed to ensure that a prescription for necessary glasses was filled, as recommended by the Optometrist (Eye Doctor). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Consultant Services, dated April 2015, indicated: -[The facility] will identify and facilitate consultant services to meet the resident's needs, to ensure optimum care for each resident/patient through consultant services. -The charge nurse will notify the attending physician of findings and he/she can then order the specific treatments as outlined by the consultant. -A consultant's report or some form of documentation pertaining to the results will be retained in the clinical record. Resident #118 was admitted to the facility in January 2024, with diagnoses including Paranoid Schizophrenia, Type 2 Diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#103) out of a total sample of 27 residents, with limited range of motion (ROM) received appropriate care and services to maintain and/or improve their mobility function. Specifically, the facility staff failed to implement a functional mobility program to have staff walk with Resident #103 as recommended by PT (Physical Therapy) upon discharge from skilled services, which resulted in an avoidable reduction in ROM and mobility for the Resident. Findings include: Resident #103 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including Type II Diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, Myasthenia Gravis without acute exacerbation, and difficulty walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/10/25, indicated Resident #103: -was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of a possible 15. -had lower extremity impairments on both sides, utilized a wheelchair, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC: flexible tube inserted through a vein in one's arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart, used to deliver medications intravenously [IV]) care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and plan of care for one Resident (#137) of two applicable residents receiving IV treatment via PICC, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #137, the facility staff failed to measure the external length of the PICC weekly, as ordered by the Physician to prevent the risk of inadvertent PICC migration and catheter related complications. Findings include: Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th Edition, dated 2021, included the following for documentation relative to PICC line migration and dressing changes: -Use a sterile measuring tape or incremental markings on the catheter to measure the external length of the catheter from hub to skin entry to make sure that the catheter has not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary Behavioral Health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#30) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #30 received follow-up Behavioral Health Services after recommendations for continued psychiatric follow-up visits were made by the Provider for a Resident with known mental illness, who demonstrated behaviors, was prescribed psychotropic medications, and who required emergency mental health evaluation for suicidal ideation (SI). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Consultant Services, dated April 2015, indicated: -The facility routinely uses their own consultants in the following specialty areas - psychiatry, dental, optometry, and podiatry. -Once the consultant is identified by the Physician . the staff will call the consultant to notify him/her of the request and document response in the medical record. -A consultant's report or some form of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled substances (drugs or chemicals that the government regulates for its manufacture, possession, and use, that are classified into schedules based on their potential for abuse) for one Unit (5th Floor) out of four units reviewed. Specifically, for the 5th Floor Unit, the facility staff failed to maintain accurate documentation in the Controlled Substance Register (Narcotic Book), relative to the recording of prescription numbers and receipt dates being recorded on the individual pages when a new controlled medication was entered into the Register or the information for a medication was transferred from one page to another. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Narcotics (Massachusetts & Rhode Island), dated April 2015, included: -Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling and record keeping in the facility, in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one Resident (#133) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #133, the facility failed to accurately document the daily total amount of administered enteral feeding. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Feeding, dated April 2015, indicated: -Check physician order for formula, rate and water flushes. -Document procedure in the resident's medical record. -Record intake, flush and free water volume administered. Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Documentation, dated February 2016, indicated: -The licensed nursing personnel documents information related to the resident's condition and care provided in the resident's medical record. -Notes should be clear, concise, and not subject to misinterpretation. -Treatments: the type and resident/patient response. Resident #133 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain appropriate hygiene practices while serving meals in the dining room, on one Unit (1st Floor) out of four Units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff distributing food during the lunch meal on the 1st Floor dining room performed appropriate hand hygiene during the meal service to prevent contamination and the spread of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, April 2015, indicated: -To protect residents/patient from health care associated infections. >Equipment: -Soap. -Warm running water. -Paper towels. >Hand Sanitizing: -Alcohol-based hand rub. Dining Service Staff Training, Revised May 2015, indicated but was not limited to: >Poor personal hygiene and cross contamination. >The key to serving safe food is to handle it safely. Remember that hand washing is the single most important measure to prevent food borne illness. Review of the facility Dietary Department Guidelines, undated, included but was not limited to: -The facility must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations (which included taking photographs), interviews and records reviewed, for four of four resident units, the facility failed to ensure it provided a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for it's residents, when during the course of the survey observations conducted in common areas, resident rooms, and resident care areas, there was obvious signs of various stages of disrepair, aging and unclean conditions, on flooring, walls, ceilings and windows, all of which were in areas accessed and utilized by residents in their daily lives, and were either unsafe, in need of immediate repair and/or created potentially hazardous conditions, none of which supported that a homelike environment was being provided for facility residents. Findings include: The Facility was unable to provide the surveyors with any policies related to the maintenance of a clean, homelike environment or pest control. During an environmental tour of Unit 5 on 10/01/24 at 7:50 A.M., Surveyor #1 observed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, for four out of four nursing units Nourishment Kitchens and in the facility's main kitchen, specifically the dish room, the Facility failed to ensured they maintained a sanitary environment related to food storage/preparation, which placed all residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Cleaning Procedures, Revised 05/12 indicated: - All areas of the Dietary Department will be cleaned on a regular schedule. Review of the Facility Dietary Department Guidelines, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - All food preparation equipment, dishes and utensils must be maintained in a clean, sanitary and safe manner and used and repaired according to manufacturer's recommendations. - All food items should be labeled and dated . Review of the Facility Policy titled, Personal Food Policy, dated 04/28/19 indicated but was not limited to: - All personal food items brought into the facility must be in airtight packaging or covered storage containers to keep bacteria out. - The staff person receiving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, the Facility failed to ensure they developed, implemented and maintained a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that was comprehensive, ensured the residents' environment was maintained to promote a clean, safe, homelike environment, and was focused on indicators of quality of life for residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility's QAPI Policy, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -Policy-The Facility will have effective QAPI programs to improve the quality of life, and quality of care and services delivered. -When fully implemented, the QAPI program should address all systems of care and management practices, and should always include clinical care, quality of life, and resident choice. -The Facility uses a systematic approach to determine when in-depth analysis is needed to fully understand the problem, its causes, and implications of a change. -The Facility uses a thorough and highly organized/structured approach to determine whether and how identified problems may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews for four out of four resident units, the Facility failed to ensure they provided a functional Resident Call/Communication System which relayed to the cell directly to staff or a centralized staff work area, that allowed residents residing on the units, to call for staff assistance. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled, Call Light Use of, dated April 2015 indicated but was not limited to: - All [name of company] Health Care Systems residents/patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within his/her reach when unattended. - Report any defective call lights in the maintenance log. - If the call light is unable to be repaired immediately provide an alternative communication method. Review of the safe/clean/comfortable/home-like environment/call light audit provided to the Surveyors completed by the Plant Manager on 10/1/24 (on the date of the survey) indicated the following: - All call lights on Unit 2 were not working. - 24 call lights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained an effective pest control program, when from the end of May 2024 to the beginning of August 2024, despite having a known active, ongoing infestation of mice and German Cockroaches (one of the most stubborn and difficult species to eliminate) in several resident care areas of the Facility, Pest Control Service visits and treatments were not conducted at the Facility during that time. Findings include: The Facility was unable to provide the surveyors with any policies related to the maintenance of a clean, homelike environment or pest control. Review of the Pest Control Service Reports indicated visits to the Facility were made on the following dates: 05/02/24, 05/16/24, 08/06/24, 08/23/24, 09/03/24, 09/17/24 and 10/01/24 (date of survey). Review of the Pest Control Service Report, dated 05/02/24, indicated the following: -five dead mice were found in the kitchen food preparation area -three dead mice were found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure that resident grievances related to services provided by the Dietary Department, including reports of cold food, were addressed and resolved by the Facility in a timely manner, when review of the last two months of Resident Council Meeting minutes, and interviews with residents, indicated there were still ongoing and unresolved resident concerns. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy for Resident Council, with a revision date of October 2015, indicated the following: Policy: -The Recreation Department will provide support and assistance in the formation of a Resident Council. The residents will have an opportunity to express their concerns or grievances, contribute ideas and make recommendations regarding the operation of the home. Procedure: -Notify Department Heads in writing of concerns that come up during the meeting. -Retain a copy of the resolution that addresses each concern. Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reported System (HCFRS), dated 08/15/24, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was at risk for developing Diabetes-related foot complications, with physician's orders for diabetic foot care, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received proper care and treatment to maintain good foot health. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled, Diabetic Foot Care, dated June 2015 indicated but was not limited to: - Diabetic foot care is provided by qualified nursing staff. Foot condition is noted and changes reported as warranted. - Nurse to contact physician for podiatry consult regarding trimming of nails. - Podiatry will be scheduled to trim toenails. - Report any irregularities to charge nurse. - Document all appropriate information in medical record including foot assessment. - Assessment will be completed on admission and with routine skin assessment. - Any pertinent findings should be reported to physician and/or appropriate practitioner. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who was assessed to be at risk for nutritional decline secondary to wound healing needs, anemia, multiple food allergies, multiple food preferences, and who had planned weight loss goals, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #2's nutritional status including body weight, were accurately assessed and monitored appropriately by nursing and per facility policy, as a result Resident #2 experienced an undesired weight gain in three months. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Weights, dated 08/2015, indicated the following: -Newly admitted residents are weighed weekly for four weeks and monthly thereafter. -All weight loss/gain of five pounds on a resident weighing 100 lbs. or more requires a reweigh for verification. -Weights are documented in the resident's medical record. -If a significant weight loss/gain is identified (greater than 5% in 30 days or 10% in 6 months), the Interdisciplinary Team, Dietician, Physician and Family are notified. Resident #2 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, for one of four resident units (Unit 3) the Facility failed to ensure the handrail in the corridor between the Nurse's Station and the Nourishment Kitchen, was secured to the wall. Finding include: During an environmental tour on 10/02/24 at 12:10 P.M., Surveyor #2 observed the handrail in the corridor on Unit 3, between the Nurses Station and Nourishment kitchen was loose and unattached from the wall, which created a gap between the end of the railing and the wall, posing a potential safety hazard to residents. During an interview on 10/02/24 at 1:25 P.M. the Administrator said all handrails should be secured to the wall.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a Physician's Order for the administration of Suboxone (a narcotic medication used for the maintenance of opioid dependence), the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified Resident #1's Physician when his/her medication was unavailable to be administered in accordance with his/her Physician orders, as a result Resident #1 did not receive his/her scheduled doses for five days (missing a total of 15 doses). Findings include: Review of the accessdata.fda.gov website related to Suboxone, indicated the following: -The medication contains buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist (produces a similar response to the intended chemical and receptor), and naxolone, an opioid antagonist (stops the receptor from producing a response), and is indicated for the maintenance of opioid dependence. -When discontinuing treatment, gradually taper to avoid signs and symptoms of withdrawal. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility, via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 05/03/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a Physician's Order for the administration of Suboxone (a narcotic medication used for the maintenance of opioid dependence), the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error when he/she was not administered his/her narcotic medication multiple days in a row (missing a total of 15 doses), which placed him/her at increased risks for adverse side effects as a result of abruptly stopping the medication. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Medication Error Reporting, dated April 2015, indicated that a medication error is any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use, which the medication is in the control of the health care professional. The Policy indicated a Medication Error Report is to be completed immediately after an error is discovered to ensure proper resident/patient follow-up. Review of the Facility Policy titled Medication Administration, dated June 2015, indicated the following: -Verify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a Physician's Order for the administration of Suboxone (a narcotic medication used for the maintenance of opioid dependence), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record when nursing documented the narcotic medication was administered, despite the medication being unavailable at the Facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Medication Administration, dated June 2015, indicated the following: -Verify the medication order on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) against the physician order -Identify the Resident -Verify the medication label to the resident's MAR -Verify the medication is being administered at the proper time, in the prescribed dose and by the correct route -Document medication administration. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility, via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 05/03/24, indicated that Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in April 2024 and had not received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for the facility residents on four Units (Unit Two, Unit Three, Unit Four, and Unit Five) out of four units observed. Specifically, the facility staff failed to repair, replace and clean: 1. On Unit Two: holes in the walls, soiled curtains, stained ceiling tiles, and a leaky bathroom sink. 2. On Unit Three: missing mirror, stained and damaged ceilings, damaged walls, loose toilets and soiled curtains. 3. On Unit Four: broken closet door, urine odor, and a damaged wall. 4. On Unit Five: leaking bath tub faucet. Finding include: 1. During an initial observation on Unit Two on 3/13/23 between 8:10 A.M. and 12:24 P.M., the surveyor observed the following: >room [ROOM NUMBER]- damage to the wall at the head of the bed (an approximately six inches by six-inch [6 x 6] tear in the wall covering). The wall covering was wrinkled and lifted away from the wall and a small piece of tape was attached to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were coded accurately for one Resident (#135) out of three closed record residents and for four Residents (#3, #23, #32, and #67) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that an MDS Assessment: 1. For Resident #135, was accurately coded relative to the Resident receiving Hospice (End of Life) services. 2. For Resident #3, was accurately coded relative to the Resident having a Significant Mental Illness (SMI) per a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II (an evaluation that confirms whether an individual has a SMI or Intellectual/Developmental Disability). 3. For Resident #23, was accurately coded relative to pressure ulcers (injury to the skin resulting from prolonged pressure) when the Resident had non-pressure related ulcers. 4. For Resident #32, was accurately coded relative to the use of a physical restraint. 5. For Resident #67, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for one Resident (#132) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to monitor fluid intake and output for Resident #132 as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Intake and Output Monitoring, April 2015, indicated the following: -Intake and output is documented each shift beginning with the 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift (night shift). -Intake and output is totaled daily by the 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. (evening shift) shift nurse and the 24 hour totals are transcribed to the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Resident #132 was admitted to the facility in February 2024, with a diagnosis of Cirrhosis (liver damage that can cause swelling and abdominal bleeding). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #132 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of practice related to psychiatric services for one Resident (#28) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that recommendations made by the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) for medication changes were reviewed by Resident #28's Attending Physician resulting in delayed management of anxiety and pain symptoms. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Consultant Services, dated April 2015, indicated the following: -A note should be recorded on the consultation form by any health care consultant who sees the resident/patient at the request of the MD or the family. The consultant should document findings and recommendations on this form. -The charge nurse will then notify the attending physician of findings and he/she can then order the specific treatments as outlined by the consultant. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder (mental health disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were maintained for two Residents (#109 and #14) who required assistance for self-care out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #109, that staff assisted the Resident with maintaining the cleanliness and length of his/her fingernails. 2. For Resident #14, that staff assisted with grooming and ensured the Resident was free from facial hair per personal and Resident Representative preference and Physician's orders. Findings include: 1. Resident #109 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia (problems with memory, reasoning, planning, judgement and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain), vision loss in his/her right eye, major depressive disorder (symptoms lasting greater than two weeks of a persistently low or depressed mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a decrease in range of motion (ROM) for one Resident (#15) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resting hand splint (a device to properly position and protect hand joints) to prevent hand contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscle, tendons or other tissue often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction (stroke-damage to tissues in the brain caused by blood clots, disrupted blood supply and restricted oxygen supply to the specific area) affecting the right dominant side and right hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). Review of the Facility's policy titled, Splints/Orthotics/Prosthetics dated April 2015, included but was not limited to: -Residents will receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#18 and #77) out of a total sample of 26 residents, who required vascular access devices (devices that provide access to the veins for the delivery of medications or fluids). Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1) For Resident #18, obtain Physician orders for the care and maintenance of a midline catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a peripheral vein above the elbow that ends just below the axilla [armpit]). 2) For Resident #77, ensure that the external length of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC: a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm then guided (threaded) into a large vein above the right side of the heart called the superior vena cava) had been measured as ordered to monitor and prevent potential complication of catheter migration. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#75) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #75 was administered the appropriate liter per minute (LPM- the amount of supplemental Oxygen someone received through an oxygen delivery device) of Oxygen as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Nasal Cannula, revised November 2020, indicate the following: -Set oxygen liter flow to the prescribed liters flow per minute {sic} Review of the AARC (American Association for Respiratory Care) Clinical Practice Guideline, updated 2014: https://www.aarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/08.07.1063.pdf indicates: -All Oxygen must be prescribed and dispensed in accordance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. -Oxygen is a medical gas and should only be dispensed in accordance with all federal, state, and local laws…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 26 residents, who had a history of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder that develops when someone has experienced a traumatic event) had a care plan developed that included the Resident's identified PTSD triggers (certain stimuli that bring back strong memories from a traumatic event these can include but are not limited to sounds, smells, physical actions, and thoughts, that can cause an adverse reaction). Specifically, the facility staff failed to identify physical abuse as a trigger for Resident #3, causing retraumatization when a male staff member put his hand on the Resident's shoulder. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in December 2017, with a diagnosis of PTSD. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a diagnosis of PTSD and he/she scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate medical care and supervision for one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to obtain a Physician order for the continued treatment of a left elbow surgical wound for Resident #77, after removal of a wound therapy device. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin and Wounds last revised in March 2023 indicated the following: -Wound treatments are done per Medical Doctor (MD) order -Residents with non-pressure wounds (arterial, venous, and diabetic ulcers, post -op surgical incisions and skin tears) are assessed, documented and provided appropriate treatment to promote healing. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in February 2024, with diagnoses including abscess (an enclosed collection of pus in tissues, organs, or confined spaces in the body) and open wound of the left elbow and Osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor the side effects and adverse reactions of psychotropic (drugs that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings or behavior and includes antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and hypnotic medications) medications for three Residents (#67, #97 and #129) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to monitor for adverse consequences and improved behaviors: 1. For Resident #67, who was ordered for, and was being administered Seroquel, Depakote, Remeron and Gabapentin (psychotropic) medications. 2. For Resident #97, who was ordered for, and was being administered Zyprexa, Trazodone, and Ativan (psychotropic) medications. 3. For Resident #129, who was ordered for, and was being administered Invega (psychotropic) medication. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Psychotropic Medication Management Guidelines, dated April 2015, indicated that it is the facility policy to optimize the functional abilities of residents while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to offer the Pneumococcal Vaccination as recommended to one Resident (#28) out of five applicable residents, in a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #28, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #28 was offered the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV- a vaccine that helps protect against diseases caused by pneumococcal bacteria) at the time of admission or shortly thereafter, putting the Resident at risk for developing facility acquired Pneumonia. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Immunization of Residents, dated January 2024 indicated the following: -All eligible residents will be offered the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines unless medically contraindicated. -Adults age [AGE]-64 with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors who have not previously received conjugate vaccine or whose previous vaccination status is unknown should receive one dose of PCV (either PCV20 or PCV15).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call system that would allow residents to directly contact caregivers for one Resident (#119) out of a total sample of 26 residents, and in five resident rooms on Unit Two. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to have functioning call bells in five resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] - room [ROOM NUMBER]) on Unit Two when the communication system that relayed calls directly to staff or to a centralized work area was identified as not working. 2. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #119 with a call bell as an alternative means to call for assistance when the call system in the Resident's room was not working. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Call Lights, Use of, dated April 2015 indicated the following: -All residents/patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within his/her reach when unattended. -If call light is unable to be repaired immediately provide an alternative communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations of two of two sampled resident care units (Unit 3 and Unit 4), the Facility failed to ensure they provided residents a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, when during the survey, there were signs of physical disrepair which included brown stained ceiling tiles, soiled window and privacy curtains, and rodent droppings. Findings include: 1) During a tour of the facility, on 01/09/24 at approximately 8:00 A.M. on Unit 3, the surveyor made the following observations: In Resident #3's room: -large brown colored stain on the ceiling tile which was adjacent to Resident #3's bed. -soiled window curtains that were not completely attached to the curtain rod. -soiled privacy curtains (curtains that hang between resident's beds). During an interview on 01/09/24 at 8:02 A.M. and 12:05 P.M., Resident #3 said the ceiling tile and the curtains had been like that since he/she had moved into that room (December 2023). Resident #3 said he/she saw mice in the Facility almost every day and said he/she would never keep his/her home in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure that resident grievances related to care and services provided by the nursing staff were addressed and resolved by the Facility in a timely manner, when review of the last three monthly Resident Council Meeting minutes indicated there were ongoing and unresolved resident concerns. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy for Resident Council, with a revision date of October 2015, indicated the following: Policy: The Recreation Department will provide support and assistance in the formation of a Resident Council. The residents will have an opportunity to express their concerns or grievances, contribute ideas and make recommendations regarding the operation of the home. Procedure: -Notify Department Heads in writing of concerns that come up during the meeting. -Retain a copy of the resolution that address each concern. On 01/09/24 the surveyor obtained written permission from the Resident Council President to review the Resident Council Meeting Minutes from the previous three months. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations for two of two sampled nursing units (Unit 2 and Unit 4), the Facility failed to ensure they provided residents a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, when during the survey, there were signs of physical disrepair which included uncovered electrical outlets, rodent droppings, and bugs in common areas. Findings include: During a tour of the Facility conducted on 09/27/23 at approximately 11:15 A.M., the surveyor made the following observations in Resident #1's room which was located on Unit 4: - significant amount of mouse droppings on top of and in the drawers of the tall dresser in the room, mouse droppings on the side table next to the bed and mouse droppings in multiple areas on the floor; -no cover on the red electrical outlet on the wall. Resident #1 was on a medical leave of absence (MLOA) at the time of the survey and was unable to be interviewed by the surveyor regarding any concerns he/she had related to the condition of his/her room. During an interview on 09/27/23 at 1:26 P.M., the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and #3), the Facility failed to ensure medications were kept locked or under direct observation of a nurse, when on 09/27/23 the Surveyor, observed 1) an Albuterol inhaler on the bedside table and a container of Silver Sulfadiazine cream on the nightstand in Resident #1's room and 2) a Flonase nasal inhaler and an Albuterol inhaler on Resident #3's side table. At the time of the observation, there were no facility nurses in either Resident #1 or Resident #3's room, therefore the medications were left unattended and unsecured. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated July 2015, indicated residents may self-administer their own medications upon request and only if the evaluation of their cognitive, physical, and visual ability to perform this task is conducted to ensure accurate and safe medication management. 1) During an observation on 9/27/23 at 11:15 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #1's Albuterol Sulfate inhaler on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided evidence that the timeframe for use of antipsychotic medication on an as needed (PRN) basis was limited to 14 days, as required, for one Resident (#49) out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided evidence that the Resident was re-evaluated every 14 days and a new order entered for PRN use of Haloperidol (antipsychotic medication) and Quetiapine Fumarate (antipsychotic medication) when the medications were being administered to the Resident. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's July 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) included the following: - PRN Haloperidol two mg tablet was administered to the Resident one time on 7/18/22, 7/23/22, and 7/25/22. - PRN Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg tablet was administered to the Resident one time on 7/18/22, 7/25/22, and 7/31/22. Review of Resident #49's August 2022 MAR included the following: - PRN Haloperidol two mg tablet was administered to the Resident one time on 8/14/22 and 8/16/22, two times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure its staff stored medications and biologicals properly. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff: 1) Secured medications located in a facility conference room. 2)Stored schedule II (considered highly addictive with a dangerous potential for abuse) controlled medications in a separately locked compartment in one out of four medication rooms and two out of eight medication carts. Findings include: On 9/19/22 at 7:41 A.M., the surveyor observed a large clear plastic bag containing medications on a table in the facility conference room. During an interview on 9/19/22 at 8:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said that the clear plastic bag containing medication should not have been left on the table in the conference room. She also said that the medication should have been destroyed. On 9/20/22 at 8:27 A.M., the surveyor and Nurse #2 observed that the compartment in medication cart B, on the fourth floor, which contained schedule II controlled medications was not locked. Nurse #2 said that the compartment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained dignity and respect for one Resident (#128) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, staff laughing at concerns voiced by the Resident. Findings include: Resident #128 was admitted to the facility in March of 2020 with a diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that the Resident was moderately, cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a total possible score of 15. On 9/20/22 at 12:55 P.M., the surveyor observed CNA #1 enter Resident #128's room and converse with the Resident who was overheard speaking loudly regarding unresolved issues. The surveyor then observed CNA #1 exit the Resident's room and stand just to the right of the doorway laughing. On 9/20/22 at 1:03 P.M., the surveyor observed the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) pass by CNA #1, who continued laughing outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff immediately notified the Physician/Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP) of the need to discontinue an existing form of treatment and commence a new form of treatment for one Resident (#129) out of 27 total residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff notified Resident #129's Physician/NPP of the Wound Physician's recommendation to alter the treatment for a stage four (full thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure wound on the Resident's right heel. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Condition: Significant Change, dated April 2015, included that staff would provide timely communication of changes in residents' conditions to the Physician. Resident #129 was admitted to the facility in April 2020. Review of Resident #129's clinical record indicated that he/she was being treated by a Wound Physician for a stage four pressure wound of the right heel since 2/23/22. Review of a Wound Evaluation and Management Summary, dated 6/22/22, included the following: - A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided activities of daily living (ADL) care for one Resident (#46) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility did not follow the Physician's orders as documented in the Resident record for bi-weekly nail trimming. Findings include: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in July 2020. Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated April 2015, indicated: a program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is developed and implemented based on the individual evaluation to encourage the highest level of functioning. This process is reviewed minimally, quarterly. Review of the Resident's September 2022 Physician's orders indicated: to please cut patient's fingernails every evening shift, every Monday and Friday, with a start date of 6/21/21. On 9/19/22 at 1:52 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #46 resting in bed with scratches and scabs of various lengths on his/her left and right shoulders, chest, forehead, and temples. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided quality of care according to professional standards of practice for one Resident (#46) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify and assess changes in the Resident's skin condition. Findings include: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in July 2020 with diagnoses including history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA- a stroke-like attack) and cerebral infarction without residual deficits (death of brain cells). Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/14/22, indicated that the Resident was cognitively impaired as was evidenced by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident was totally dependent on staff for hygiene, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and had a legal guardian. Review of the facility policy titled Weekly Body Audit, last revised 7/2017, indicated that: all residents will have a body audit to address skin issues on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff involved the Physician/Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP) in evaluating and managing complications of an enteral feeding tube (surgically placed device that delivers nutrition into the digestive system) for one Resident (#132) reviewed, of three residents with enteral feeding tubes, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff: a) Consulted the Physician/NPP or obtained orders from the Physician/NPP for declogging the Resident's enteral feeding tube prior to using a manual device to declog the tube. b) Discarded the disposable, one time use manual declogging device after staff used the device to declog the Resident's enteral feeding tube, and c) Documented enteral feeding tube complications and interventions in the Resident's medical record. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Enteral Feeding, dated April 2015, included that equipment and supplies used for enteral feeding were to be discarded or stored appropriately, and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided evidence of Nurse competencies relative to managing complications for residents with enteral feeding tubes. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided evidence that competencies had been completed for Nurses to use the Quick Clear Wand Enteral Feeding Tube Clog Remover to declog one Resident's (#132) enteral feeding tube, out of three residents with enteral feeding tubes, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the manufacturer instructions for the Quick Clear Wand Enteral Feeding Tube Clog Remover, undated, included the following: - Insert the wand into the feeding tube until you have reached the blockage. - Rotate the wand clockwise and counter clockwise to break up the clog. - Once the clog is clear, flush the feeding tube with at least 30 cubic centimeters of warm water. - Dispose of the wand. Resident #132 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with a diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff adhered to food storage and sanitation requirements in three out of four nourishment kitchens. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Dietary Department Guidelines, undated, included the following: - The facility was required to store food under sanitary conditions. - All food items stored in the refrigerator were to be covered and labeled with the contents and date. - All potentially hazardous foods were to be discarded within three calendar days after the date prepared. - All food equipment was to be maintained in a clean, sanitary manner . - Any piece of equipment .will be discarded when it is cracked, broken, discolored, or abraded. On 9/20/22 at 8:37 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the Unit Two Nourishment Kitchen: - One plastic container filled with an off white colored substance, not labeled or dated. - One plastic bag containing multiple food items, labeled with a resident's name and dated 8/11/22. - One carton of coffee creamer stored on the bottom shelf…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff monitored two Residents (#44 and #61) for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 daily, out of three sampled residents, to prevent the spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) guidance, Update to Caring for Long-Term Care Residents during the COVID-19 Response, including Visitation Conditions, Communal Dining, and Congregate Activities, dated 6/10/22, indicated that residents should be asked about COVID-19 symptoms and must have their temperatures checked a minimum of one time per day. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in April 2019. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility in April 2021. Review of the September 2022 Physician's orders for Resident #44 and #61 indicated monitoring the following every shift for COVID, with a start date of 9/21/22: - to evaluate and document respiratory rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation level on room air. -lung sounds, shortness of breath. -any coughing, vomiting, diarrhea. Review of the both the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-09-22 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff issued transfer notice of hospitalizations to Resident/ Resident Representative for one Resident (#123), out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #123 was admitted to the facility in August 2022. Review of a progress note dated 8/20/22, indicated that the Resident was transferred to the hospital for an evaluation. Review of the clinical record indicated no evidence that a transfer notice was issued to the Resident or Resident Representative as required. During an interview on 9/20/22 at 2:05 P.M., Social Worker (SW) #1 said she could not find evidence that a transfer notice was issued.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-09-22 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff issued a bed hold policy to Resident/ Resident Representative related to hospitalization for one Resident (#123), out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #123 was admitted to the facility in August 2022. Review of a progress note dated 8/20/22, indicated that the Resident was transferred to the hospital for an evaluation. Review of the clinical record indicated no evidence that a bed hold policy was issued to the Resident or Resident Representative as required. During an interview on 9/20/22 at 2:05 P.M., Social Worker (SW) #1 said she could not find evidence that a bed hold policy was issued as required.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$71,392 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $59,511 — penalty dated 2024-10-02
  • $11,881 — penalty dated 2023-09-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATHENA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5AdviniaCare Orchard, LLCEast Providence, RI 1 of 5Cape Regency Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterCenterville, MA 1 of 5Civita Care BayviewWaterford, CT 1 of 5Civita Care NorthbridgeBridgeport, CT 1 of 5Civita Care Sheriden WoodsBristol, CT 1 of 5Lanessa Extended CareWebster, MA 1 of 5Marlborough Hills Rehabilitation & Health Care CenMarlborough, MA 1 of 5Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLowell, MA 1 of 5Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterHaverhill, MA 1 of 5Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterNorth Easton, MA 1 of 5Southshore Health Care CenterRockland, MA 1 of 5Wadsworth Glen Health Care And Rehabilitation CentMiddletown, CT 2 of 5AdviniaCare Waterview Villas, LLCEast Providence, RI 2 of 5Berkshire Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterSandisfield, MA 2 of 5Cape Heritage Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSandwich, MA 2 of 5Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester, MA 2 of 5Plymouth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterPlymouth, MA 2 of 5Southbridge Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSouthbridge, MA 2 of 5Webster Manor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWebster, MA 3 of 5Tremont Rehabilitation & Skilled Care CenterWareham, MA 4 of 5Civita Care MeadowbrookGranby, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATHENA HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS MA R LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2012
CHAKALOS-SANTILLI, VALERIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2012
CURTIS, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
MOSIER, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE6%since 09/01/2012
REZENDES, LORRIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2012
SANTILLI, LAWRENCEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER74%since 05/01/2019
KAUFMAN, DANIELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2018
WHITCRAFT, CARLYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/01/2019
ATHENA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 3%Other / private 5%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$363per resident / day
operating cost
$11,029per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$321per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225199. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next