Pendleton Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 194 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #283) reviewed for accidents and required the assistance of two staff members for care, the facility failed to ensure that two staff were in place when care was being provided, resulting in a fall with an injury. The findings include: Resident #283 diagnoses included depression, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, morbid obesity, osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified moderately impaired cognition, no behavioral symptoms, required extensive assistance of at least two persons for all ADL care with the exception of eating, did not ambulate, was unsteady with surface to surface transfers and only able to stabilize with staff assistance, had range of motion limitations on one side of the upper and lower extremities, utilized a wheelchair for mobility and had not fallen in the last three months. The care plan dated 8/21/19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) who were reviewed for an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to ensure a nursing assessment was completed and documented in the clinical record at the time the allegation and assessment was reported. The findings include:1.Resident #1's diagnoses included altered mental status, adjustment disorder with depressed mood and cerebral edema (swelling in the brain caused by an accumulation of excess fluid in the brain tissues). The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a staff assessment for mental status completed identifying both short and long-term memory problems, required supervision assistance with toileting and was independent with bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/9/25 identified Resident #1 could be non-compliant with medication administration, Activities of Daily Living (ADL)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to revise to complete neurological checks as per facility standard. The findings include: Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were completed after an unwitnessed fall, in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included non-traumatic subdural hematoma, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) right leg below the knee amputation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/13/2025 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls due to confusion, disorientation and was on anticoagulation (blood thinner). Interventions directed Resident #1 was independent with transfers, and to remind resident to ask…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #88) who experienced a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified when the resident experienced symptoms of pain and swelling of the left hand. The findings include: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, gout, and atrial fibrillation. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #88 was cognitively intact, required maximum assistance with lower body dressing, bathing, and toileting. Physician's progress notes dated 11/19/24 identified the resident was seen for hand pain to the right hand and noted the resident had superficial thrombophlebitis to the Left hand while at the hospital and recommended that Coumadin be switched to Lovenox(anticoagulant) to minimize the pricks to the fingers required for blood testing as a result of being on Coumadin.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #88) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was receiving anticoagulant medication, the facility failed to ensure the care plan addressed the monitoring of possible side effects of anticoagulant medication and actions to take in the event of the need for emergent care. The findings included: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, gout, and atrial fibrillation. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #88 was cognitively intact, required maximum assistance with lower body dressing, bathing, and toileting. It further identified the resident received anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident #88's care plan dated 10/31/24 failed to identify the resident was receiving anticoagulant medication and failed to have interventions in place to address monitoring for possible side effects and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #22 and Resident #101) observed with medications at the bedside, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered according to acceptable standards of practice. The findings include: 1. Resident #22's diagnoses included respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified asthma, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #22 was cognitively intact, required moderate assistance for dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers, was independent with toileting hygiene, bed mobility and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The care plan dated 10/1/24 identified Resident #22 had oxygen therapy related to COPD with interventions that included give medications as ordered by physician and monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report to provider as needed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #44) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled. The findings include: Resident #44's diagnoses included muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 was moderately cognitively impaired, required supervision with bed mobility, supervision with toileting, required partial to moderate assistance with bathing and utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The care plan dated 1/3/25 identified Resident #44 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions that included: provide resident with level of care for bathing and showering, break tasks into sub tasks if needed, and shower and bath on specified day/shift. Interview with Resident #44 on 1/17/24 at 3:00 PM identified that in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #22) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as prescribed by the physician. The findings include: Resident #22's diagnoses included respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #22 was cognitively intact, required moderate assistance for dressing, personal hygiene, transfers, and independent with toileting hygiene and bed mobility. The assessment further identified the resident utilized a wheelchair independently for mobility. The care plan dated 10/1/24 identified Resident #22 had oxygen therapy related to COPD with interventions that included give medications as ordered by physician and monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #18), reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the pneumococcal vaccine was administered as requested by the resident upon admission. The findings include: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in June of 2024 and had diagnoses that included cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, unspecified dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with exacerbation. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #18 was cognitively intact, and the assessment further identified Resident #18 pneumococcal vaccination was not up to date. Review of the Immunization Report identified Resident #18 received pneumococcal conjugate (PCV 13) historically (prior to admission to the facility) on 12/7/2015 and pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPV23) historical on 12/4/2017. Review of the Pneumococcal Immunization Informed Consent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and staff interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was a recent admission, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for proper medication dosing and failed to follow the warning on the Medication Administration Record alerting staff to improper medication dosing. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, mitral valve insufficiency, and prostate cancer. The admission Medication Regimen Review note dated 5/13/24 at 7:56 AM identified a dose alert for the medication Relugolix. A physician's order dated 5/15/24 directed to administer Relugolix 120 milligram (mg) tablet, take 360mg once on day one (1), 5/16/24, and then 120mg daily thereafter. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no memory recall deficits and was oriented to person, place, and time. Review of the May, June, July, and August 2024 Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for abuse or neglect, the facility failed to ensure care was provided with dignity and respect. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, dementia and nocturia. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, can usually understand others, required limited assistance for transfers and bed mobility, and supervision for ambulation with a rolling walker. The RCP dated 6/2/2022 identified Resident #1 had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes due to dementia and a communication problem. The RCP directed for staff to ask yes/no questions to determine resident needs, cue/re-orient and supervise as needed, provide consistent caregivers to decrease confusion and to anticipate and meet needs validating resident's message by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $266K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT