No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Atlas Post Acute At Woodbury Country Club

467 Cooper Street, Woodbury, NJ 08096 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (856) 345-1200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 20245 immediate-jeopardy citations$561,530 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $561,530 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
190 N Evergreen Ave · (856) 845-8010 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
25 E Red Bank Ave · (856) 853-4600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
820 Cooper St · (856) 723-0848 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.4%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.7%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.3%97.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.5%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.8%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine28.6%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.2%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.1%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.992.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.931.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 727 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 213 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.2%CMS range 54.3–61.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 9.8–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 6.6–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
56.0%
Total nursing turnover
59.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 116.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-24)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-12-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint#: NJ00173566 Based on interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents code status was documented in the medical records, the Physician's Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) reflected the residents' end of life wishes and the proper documentation was completed so that those end of life wishes were honored in the facility and/or during transport. The facility also failed to follow its policies titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives and the Social Services Director Job Description for 8 of 28 residents (Resident (R)2, R10, R13, R17, R24, R25, R26, and R28) reviewed for code status. R17 was admitted to the facility from the hospital with documented evidence that he/she had chosen a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) code status; however, the facility ordered a Full Code despite no documented evidence the facility verified with the resident and/or family that R17 wishes were not to be a DNR. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint#: NJ00173566 Based on interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders matched the resident's documented end-of-life wishes, which resulted in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) being done on a resident (Resident (R) 17) reviewed for code status out of a total sample of 22 residents. While in the hospital, R17 chose to be a do-not-resuscitate (DNR). However, the facility was unable to provide evidence that they implemented their policy for R17 for Advance Directives upon R17 admission to the facility. On [DATE], when R17 was found unresponsive, the facility performed approximately five rounds of chest compressions on the resident before the emergency medical services (EMS) arrived. EMS intubated [inserted a tube into the windpipe to provide oxygen via ventilator] R17 when they arrived on site and continued CPR via an automatic machine as they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited beforedisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00158123, NJ00158489, NJ00158677, NJ00159247, NJ00159800, NJ00167295, NJ00168400, NJ00168603, NJ00169368, NJ00169776 Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies, the facility systemically failed to provide and maintain pharmaceutical services to acquire, receive, dispense, administer, and reconcile medications for 6 residents reviewed for medications (Resident R 60, R14, R64, R32, R63, and R9) out of a total sample of 65 residents. This systemic failure affected and/or had the likelihood to affect all residents of the facility, and any future admissions to the facility. The facility's systemic failure to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of each resident had caused or was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 01/06/24 and was determined to exist on 06/04/22, in the area of §483.45 Pharmacy Services F755 at a scope and severity (S/S) of L. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Ldisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility Administrator's Job Description, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled effective use of its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This failure had the likelihood to affect all 115 residents of the facility. 1. The facility's administration failed to ensure residents remained free from neglect and abuse when R37 and R57 sustained actual harm from being deprived of treatment; and R38's family reported that ostomy paste adhesive was found directly in the center of R38's stoma, obstructing the waste from emptying into his ileostomy bag. Even after being informed of the potential abuse, the Administrator failed to identify the event as an allegation of abuse, report the event as an allegation of abuse to the state survey agency, and failed to complete a thorough investigation. Cross Reference: F600-L 2. The facility's administration failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were maintained to meet residents' needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00157215, NJ00161186, NJ00161762, NJ00162457, NJ00162827, NJ00167295, NJ00168400, NJ00168545, NJ00168603, NJ00169368 Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident (R) 38) right to be free from physical abuse by staff and failed to protect two residents' (R37 and R57) right to be free from neglect out of a total sample of 65 residents. An allegation was reported that R38 was found with adhesive paste inside his ileostomy stoma. It was reported the stoma adhesive paste was in an amount sufficient to obstruct R38's stoma. The facility failed to identify the alleged incident as an allegation of abuse, failed to report the allegation to the state agency, failed to conduct a thorough investigation, and failed to protect residents during the investigation. R37 received Eliquis, an anticoagulant medication, suffered an unwitnessed fall, and the facility neglected to monitor for changes in level of consciousness. R37 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint 2616856Based on interview, record review, and policy review on 9/26/2025 and 9/29/2025, it was determined that the facility failed a. to ensure medications were administered to a resident according to standards of practice and b. to follow their own policy for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #1 receiving a scheduled pain medication late, with the potential for unrelieved pain and discomfort.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following:According to Resident #1's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: fracture of the nasal bones. A Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 08/19/2025, revealed that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating the resident had a moderately impaired cognition.A Review of Resident #1's Care Plan (CP) revealed a focus of I have ( acute) pain r/t [related to] recent nasal bone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/16/25 from 9:37 AM to 10:33AM, the surveyor observed the following in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD #1): The Dry Storage Room 1. Plastic portion cup lids spilling out of the plastic bag, not covered. The FSD #1 stated that the lids should be covered and in the plastic bag. 2. A box of white plastic fork utensils spilling out of the plastic bag, not covered. FSD #1 stated that that the plastic forks should be covered and stored in the plastic bag. Reach in Refrigerator 1. A half empty blue sports drink bottle not dated or labeled. FSD #1 stated that the bottle could have belonged to a staff member or a resident and should not have been in the refrigerator. FSD #1 discarded the blue sports drink bottle. The kitchen floor by the stove and food prep area had black debris. The bottom shelf of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint: #NJ184884 #NJ 170485 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) maintain an accurate accountability for the management and administration of a Milrinone (a medication primarily used to treat life-threatening heart failure) intravenous infusion b.) ensure skin assessments were completed accurately upon admission, per physician's order, and according to the facility policy when a new skin condition was identified. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #179) reviewed for a change in condition and for 1of 5 residents (Resident # 178) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ176079, #NJ182553 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a shower as scheduled. This deficient practice was identified for 1of 5 residents (Resident #122) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/25 at 10:00 AM, a resident council meeting was conducted with six (6) alert and oriented residents (Residents #19, #33, #39, #52 and #122), Resident # 122 stated that he/she was supposed to receive a shower the day before (4/16/25) and was not offered a shower. Resident #122 further stated that their shower days were Wednesdays and Saturdays and stated, My hair gets greasy. On 4/17/25 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #122 awake and alert sitting in their room, hair appeared slick. Resident #122 stated that he/she did not get their shower as scheduled the night before (4/16/25). The resident further stated, Can't you see by my greasy hair? The resident stated he/she did not have to ask for a shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an air mattress was accurately set according to the resident's weight. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/25 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 lying in bed awake on an air mattress. The air mattress pump was noted on the foot of the bed and it was set at 350 pounds (lbs). When interviewed, the resident stated that they weighed 260 lbs. The resident stated that they had a wound on their left heel that resulted prior to admission after two hip surgeries. The resident stated that he/she wore a boot on the right foot. On 4/22/25 at 12:32 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 lying in bed. The resident stated that he/she had a boot on their right foot. The resident then stated that the air mattress kept running out of air, and the staff had already changed it once. The surveyor noted that the weight setting was still set at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) label, date, and store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner and b.) clarify a physician's order. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #88) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following: On 4/16/2025 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor observed resident #88 resting in bed, alert and awake. The nasal cannula (N/C - a medical device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or air to a patient through the nostrils) was draped over the resident's nightstand, open to air, and unused. At that time, the resident stated that he/she last used the oxygen yesterday (4/14/2025) and the doctor was trying to wean them off the oxygen. As the surveyor exited Resident #88's room, a portable oxygen tank was noted on the resident's wheelchair (W/C) in the bathroom. The N/C tubing was draped over the W/C and the part of the tubing that would be applied under the resident's nostrils was touching the floor. A review of the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ #'s: 171463, 176079, and 182553 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and call bells were answered timely without waiting a long period of time for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #182) reviewed for sufficient nurse staffing. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the Call bell Audit Report for Resident #182 from 7/5/24 to 8/11/24. The section under Response reflected the following dates and response times greater than (>)15 minutes): On 7/8/24 at 10:32 AM, response time was 16 minutes (mins) and 38 seconds (secs) On 7/8/24 at 1:39 PM, response time was 15 mins and 58 secs On 7/16/24 at 1:28 AM, response time was 15 mins and 25 secs On 7/21/24 at 7:18 AM, response time was 15 mins and 42 secs On 7/24/24 at 7:29 PM, response time was 17 mins and 13 secs On 7/26/24 at 12:34 PM, response time was 17 mins and 38 secs On 8/8/24 at 12:41 AM, response time was 17 mins and 39 secs A review of Resident #182's electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ #171463 Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) administer medications in accordance to the physician's orders for Resident #177), b.) ensure that the declining controlled substance count was signed for two (2) residents (Resident #20 and #58) on one (1) of three (3) medication carts (cart #3) checked during the medication storage task, and c.) ensure that the narcotic shift to shift was not presigned on one (1) of three (3) medication carts checked during the Medication storage task. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 4/23/25 at 2:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #177. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, hypertension (high blood pressure), and tachycardia (fast heart rate). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 1/30/2024, included the resident had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately administer pain medications in accordance with physician orders. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #20) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: On 4/23/25 at 10:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 in bed with their eyes closed. On 4/23/25 at 10:19 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident #20. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, generalized anxiety disorder. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 2/17/2025, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. A review of the individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area, dated 6/12/2024, that the resident had chronic pain related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ#: 171460 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications properly. This deficient practice was identified on one (1) of two (2) units (200 Unit) and evidenced as follows: On 4/16/25 at 11:05 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor entered Resident #10's room and observed a fluticasone-salmeterol 500 - 50 microgram/actuation (mcg/act) inhaler (used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) on the resident's overbed table. At 11:11 AM, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, who stated that medications were stored in the medication cart and should never be left in the resident's room at the bedside. At that time, LPN #7 was informed that the fluticasone-salmeterol was in the resident's room. LPN #7 stated that she would follow up and was observed going into the resident's room. On 4/16/25 at 1:44 PM, the surveyor conducted a follow-up interview with LPN #7. LPN #7 stated that the inhaler was removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ #171463 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's dietary preferences were accurately implemented for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #20) reviewed for dining and was evidenced by the following: On 4/22/25 at 8:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 sitting upright in their bed with a breakfast tray on the overbed table. The resident's diet slip indicated a Western omelette, home-fried potatoes, margarine, two cold cereals, yogurt, coffee with cream and sugar. Instead of an omelet, the resident's breakfast tray included scrambled eggs, one cold cereal, and no yogurt. At that time, the surveyor interviewed the resident, who stated that occasionally the facility ran out of yogurt, and would not receive any. On 4/22/25 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #20. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that the Resident #20 had a diagnosis that included, diabetes mellitus and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #6, and #7) observed during the medication observation task and was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/2025 at 8:49 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #6) administer the medication to Resident #112. After administering the medication and performing hand hygiene, she went into an unsampled resident's room to assist the resident. She touched the resident's mattress, then proceeded to wash her hands. After washing her hands, she turned off the faucet with her bare hand. At that time, the surveyor interviewed LPN #6, who stated that she should have turned the faucet off with a dry paper towel. On 4/17/2025 at 9:49 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #7 administer medication to Resident #226, immediately following the administration, LPN #7 washed her hands then turned the faucet off with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#'s: NJ00177015 and NJ00180017. Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure documentation of controlled substance medications accurately reflected disposition and administration times in 3 of 28 residents (Resident (R)4, R23, and R24). The facility's failure placed residents who were ordered and administered controlled medications at risk of their controlled medications being misappropriated/diverted. This provided inaccurate documented evidence during the investigation of misappropriation/diversion events and/or allegations. Findings include: 1. Review of R4's undated admission Record, located in the resident's EMR under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R4's physician Orders, located in the resident's EMR under the Orders tab revealed the resident was ordered alprazolam (a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety and is a schedule 4 controlled medication) 2 MG [milligram] twice a day. Review of R4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#'s: NJ00177015 and NJ00180017. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on special droplet/contact precautions for 4 of 22 residents (Residents (R) 10, R11, R12, and R13) reviewed for COVID-19 out of a sample of 22 residents. The facility also failed to follow its COVID-19 Prevention, Response, and Reporting policy. This created the potential for the transmission of infection to staff and other residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R10's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection. On 12/07/24, COVID-19 was added as a diagnosis. Review of R10's Prog Note tab revealed a Skilled Note, dated 12/07/24 at 10:34 PM, During the first shift, resident tested positive for covid. All isolation precautions put in place . A review of R10's Care Plan, located in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaints: NJ00151851, NJ00153272, NJ00153799, NJ00156210, NJ00157166, NJ00157827 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure agency staff were competent in their duties before allowing them to work with residents. This had the potential to affect 115 of 115 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 01/04/24 at 12:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated sometimes the agency nurses working at the facility did not order medications as needed. RN1 reported that during June 2023, a resident had to be sent to the hospital for respiratory distress because the agency staff had not ordered a refill of their breathing treatment medication. During an interview on 01/04/24 at 8:37 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7, who was an agency nurse, stated she did not receive any orientation to the facility prior to working there other than how to log into PCC (Point Click Care, the facility's electronic medical records system). LPN7 reported that 01/04/24 was her first day working at the facility. During an interview on 01/04/24 at 12:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's Medical Director's Responsibilities policy, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director was aware of serious occurrences in Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Quality of Care, and Pharmacy Services that resulted in actual harm and/or the likelihood for serious harm or death. The facility's failure had the potential to affect all 115 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 01/04/24 at 12:50 PM, the Medical Director stated he was not aware of any issues with the facility procuring medications for residents as nothing had been brought up in QAPI or the facility's monthly meetings. The Medical Director stated it was his expectation if a resident was admitted during the day, the resident's medications would only take a few hours to arrive at the facility as the pharmacy was just a couple miles down the road. Cross Reference: F755-L The Medical Director stated related to R57's edema, the provider who was initially notified of the resident's concern should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00158123, NJ00158489, NJ00159800 Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for six residents (Resident (R) 64, R14, R63, R57, R58, and R15) of a total sample of 65 residents. The facility's failure to ensure nursing staff completely and accurately documented each residents clinical status placed all 115 residents of the facility at risk for serious unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Review of R64's undated admission Record, provided by the facility, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm (cancer) of lung, malignant neoplasm of brain, and malignant neoplasm of bone. Review of R64's Physician Orders, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Orders tab, revealed an order dated 01/04/24 at 9:00 PM for Lyrica [pain medication] Capsule 75 MG [milligram] give one capsule by mouth twice a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that identified quality concerns, developed corrective actions, and monitored for adverse events related to pharmacy services, documentation, and call light response times. This had the potential to affect 115 of 115 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 01/09/24 at 9:31 AM, the Regional Clinician (RC) confirmed she was speaking on behalf of the facility regarding the facility's QAPI program. The RC was asked how the QAPI program addressed the facility's pharmacy system. The RC stated if concerns were brought up, most likely the nursing department would be put in charge of putting a plan of improvement in place. The RC was asked what monitoring systems were in place for the pharmacy system. The RC stated the facility had clinical meetings Monday through Friday where they discussed notes from nursing, patient relations, lab results, and assessments to determine what to address. The RC stated concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00156380, NJ00156776, NJ00157166, NJ00157827, NJ00159247, NJ00159405, NJ00161524, NJ00168545, NJ00168603 Based on observations, interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a clean comfortable and homelike environment, this was evidenced by the facility failing to have an adequate supply of clean linens (towels, washcloths, flat sheets, fitted sheets, and gowns) available for resident use. Findings include: The facility had 124 beds and a census of 114 at the time of survey entrance. The 100 Hallway had 59 residents and the 200 Hallway had 55 residents based on facility census. Observation on 01/03/24 at 11:00 AM with the Housekeeping Director (HD) of the storage container located near the back door revealed: 10 dozen (120) towels. 10 dozen (120) washcloths. During an interview at this time the HD stated these supplies were new stock that were not yet in circulation; floor staff did not have access to this supply. Observation on 01/06/24 at 1:00 PM of the clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were addressed for two of 65 sampled residents (Resident (R) 62 and R21). The facility failed to document significant concerns as grievances; failed to address the concerns; failed to communicate resolution; and failed to assess resident/family satisfaction upon the conclusion of the grievance. Findings include: 1. Review of the admission Record in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Diagnoses tab in the EMR under the Resident tab revealed R62's admission diagnoses included inguinal hernia with obstruction, covid-19, end stage renal disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. During an interview on 01/05/24 at 4:30 PM, Family Member (F)1 stated she was dissatisfied because R62 had not received adequate care since his admission to the facility. F1 stated she came to the facility on [DATE], the day after R62 was admitted , and she brought…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint: NJ00158720, NJ00159247, NJ00159405, NJ00161186 Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of 65 sampled residents (Residents (R)15, R3, and R4) reviewed for nutrition received nutritional care and services to maintain adequate parameters of nutritional status. R15 was not weighed, and a nutritional assessment was not completed; and for R15, R3, and R4 meal intake was not recorded or monitored. These failures placed residents at risk for undetected weight loss and dehydration. Findings include: Review of the Nutritional Management policy dated August 2023 revealed, A systematic approach is used to optimize each resident's nutritional status: a. Identifying and assessing each resident's nutritional status and risk factors, b. Evaluating/analyzing the assessment information. c. Developing and consistently implementing pertinent approaches. d. Monitoring the effectiveness of interventions and revising them as necessary . A comprehensive nutritional assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00151851, NJ00153272, NJ00153799, NJ00156210, NJ00157166, NJ00157827, NJ00158123, NJ00158489, NJ00158720, NJ00158677, NJ00159247, NJ00159405, NJ00159679, NJ00159800, NJ00160123, NJ00161147, NJ00161524, NJ00162457, NJ00162827, NJ00162977, NJ00168603, NJ00169368 Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing department staffing was adequate in numbers and responsiveness to meet the needs of 17 out 65 sampled residents (Residents (R)59, R34, R35, R36, R14, R16, R18, R21, R20, R15, R62, R57, R42, R40, R44, R41, and R4). Staffing was inadequate to ensure residents' call lights were answered timely, residents were toileted timely, received medications timely, received meals timely, and were gotten up, dressed, and provided hygiene timely. This created the potential for residents' needs not to be met and for residents to decline and be neglected. Findings include: Review of the Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy dated November 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00158123, NJ00158489, NJ00158677, NJ00159247, NJ00159800 Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Fifteen errors were made with a total of 47 opportunities for error, resulting in a 31.9% error rate. The errors involved two residents of five residents (Resident (R) R58 and R65) reviewed for medication administration out of a total sample of 65 residents. Fourteen medications, including insulin, were not administered to R58 within one hour of the scheduled time. Stiolto, a respiratory combination inhaler, was not administered to R65 due to the medication not being available. 1. Review of R58's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Profile tab, documented R58 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and diabetic neuropathy. Review of R58's admission Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00157166, NJ00162457 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 15 residents, including seven sampled residents (Resident (R)18, R53, R47, R55, R49, R50, R51) and eight of 13 residents attending the group interview (R6, R42, R43, R40, R44, R57, R4, R41), were served a well-balanced diet taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. Residents' preferences were not served in accordance with their meal tickets. When residents contacted the dietary department for alternate selections staff did not consistently answer the phone, the selections were not consistently available, or the selections were not served. This created the potential for resident dissatisfaction and weight loss. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 01/03/23 at 10:19 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated new residents were given a copy of the weekly menu in effect and the Always Available Menu at the time of admission. The DM stated residents were asked about their food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaints: NJ00153272, NJ00160123, NJ00161147, NJ00169368 Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed for five residents (Resident (R) 46, R47, R51, R52, R54). Foods were not served in accordance with the menu for residents on renal, mechanical soft and pureed diets. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated Diet Master report provided by the facility on 01/03/24 and review of each resident's meal ticket dated 01/03/24 revealed: a. R46 was prescribed a regular, no added salt (NAS), liberalized renal diet with large portions. b. R47 was prescribed a ground diet. c. R51 was prescribed a puree diet. d. R52 was prescribed a regular liberalized renal, no concentrated sweets (NCS) diet. e. R54 was prescribed a puree NCS diet. 2. Kitchen and dining observations revealed R46, R47, R51, R52, and R54 were not served the correct foods in accordance with the menu: a. Review of the undated Week 1 Menu for lunch on 01/03/24 called for peppers and onions, two chicken tacos (with tortillas), salsa, sour cream,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: NJ00157166, NJ00160123, NJ00162177, NJ00162457, NJ00162977 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable for ten residents including two sampled residents (Resident (R) 20 and R18) and eight of 13 residents attending the group interview (R44, R43, R41, R42, R57, R14, R40, R4) out of a total sample of 65 residents. Specifically, the food did not taste good, was not appetizing in appearance, and was not at a palatable temperature when residents received their meals. This created the potential for dissatisfaction and weight loss. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 01/05/24 at 10:29 AM, Family Member (F) 3 stated R20 did not like the food. F3 stated the food was, inedible . like dog food. F3 further stated the food was, awful and R20 would not eat it. Review of the undated admission Record provided by the facility revealed R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including protein calorie…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint: NJ000168256 Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents' property was safeguarded from misappropriation for one of two residents (Resident (R) 30) reviewed for misappropriation of property out of a total sample of 65 residents. R30 returned to the facility to retrieve her personal belongings after she was emergently transferred to an acute care hospital; however, the facility could not locate the resident's belongings. Findings include: Review of R30's undated admission Record, provided by the facility, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Review of R30's nursing Progress Note, dated 09/12/23 and located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under Progress Notes tab, revealed eMAR-Administration Note .Note Text: sent to ER [emergency room] for eval [evaluation]. Review of the EMR revealed no documentation after R30 was discharged to an acute care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the required agencies within two hours for one resident (Resident (R) 38) and failed to report timely an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for one resident (R30) out of a total sample of 65 residents. The failure presented a potential for continued abuse and misappropriation of property for R38 and R30, respectively. Findings include: 1. Review of R38's admission Record, provided by the facility, revealed R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, ileostomy status, and other intestinal obstruction. Review of R38's Physician Orders, dated 12/06/23 and located under the Orders tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed staff was to change R38's ostomy wafer and bag on the 11-7 shift. Review of R38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS),located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident (R) 38) and an allegation of misappropriation of property for one resident (R30) out of a total sample of 65 residents. These failures increased the potential for additional allegations of abuse to go uninvestigated in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of R38's admission Record, provided by the facility, revealed R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, ileostomy status, and other intestinal obstruction. Review of R38's Physician Orders, dated 12/06/23 and located under the Orders tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed orders to change R38's ostomy wafer and ostomy bag daily on the 11-7 shift. Review of R38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS),located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/12/23, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IIDR2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint: NJ00157215, NJ00157739, NJ00157827, NJ00158677, NJ00161186, NJ00161524, NJ00162977, NJ00167295, NJ00168545 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to flush gastrostomy tube and provide oral nutrition supplements as ordered for resident (R16) out of a total sample of 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the undated admission Record provided by the facility revealed R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cancer of the tongue, protein calorie malnutrition, tracheostomy (incision into the windpipe opening a direct airway) status, and gastrostomy (artificial opening into the stomach for nutritional support) status. R16 was discharged on 09/25/23; his closed record was reviewed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/18/23 provided by the facility revealed R16's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. R16 was 71 inches tall (5'11) and weighed 130…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint : NJ00167295 Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of one sampled residents reviewed for tracheostomy care and services (Resident (R)16) received consistent care and services as prescribed by the physician to address his tracheostomy and respiratory needs. Findings include: Review of the undated admission Record provided by the facility revealed R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cancer of the tongue and tracheostomy (incision into the windpipe opening a direct airway) status. R16 was discharged on 09/25/23; his closed record was reviewed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/18/23, provided by the facility, revealed R16's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Review of the Care Plan with a cancellation date of 09/25/23 and provided by the facility revealed a focus area of, I have a tracheostomy r/t [related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff consistently monitored the refrigerator temperature for safe temperature ranges. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, revealed, Food will be stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The policy indicated Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage include: i. Monitoring food temperatures and functioning of the refrigeration equipment daily and at routine intervals during all hours of operation. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 04/10/2023 at 10:04 AM, it was noted the April 2023 Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log for the refrigerator had not been updated since 04/05/2023. During an interview on 04/10/2023 at 1:19 PM, the Dining Services Director said he expected his staff to ensure the temperature logs were up to date. New Jersey Administrative Code §…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to assess 1 (Resident #62) of 5 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. Findings included: Review of a facility policy, titled, Self-Administration of Medication, revised February 2021, revealed, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. The policy further indicated, 3. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan and 8. Self-administered medications are stored in a safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-14 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, facility policy review, and the Centers or Medicare & Medicaid [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, it was determined the facility failed to encode and transmit a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 (Resident #43) of 28 residents reviewed for MDS requirements. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, revised March 2022, revealed, A comprehensive assessment of every resident's needs is made at intervals designated by OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] and PPS [Prospective Payment System] requirements. Further review of the policy revealed, 1. The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the interdisciplinary team conducts timely and appropriate resident assessments and reviews, including (7) Discharge assessment (return anticipated and return not anticipated). The facility policy indicated 2. The RAI User's Manual (Chapter 2) provides detailed information on timing and submission of assessments. Review of the Centers or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment after a fall for 1 (Resident #281) of 3 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct routine neurological examinations (neuro checks) for Resident #281 after a fall on 04/10/2022. Findings included: Review of the facility undated Neurological Check Flowsheet, revealed neuro checks should be completed every 15 minutes for one hour, then every 30 minutes for four hours, then every hour for two hours, then once per shift for a total of 72 hours. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #281 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiomegaly, heart failure, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, prepatellar bursitis of the left knee, and depressive disorder. Review of Resident #281's care plan initiated on 04/06/2022 revealed the resident was at risk for falls and had a fall on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure that staff used the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when caring for newly admitted residents who were under observation for sign/symptoms of COVID-19 for 5 of 8 staff members observed for infection control practices on 2 of 2 units (100 Unit and 200 Unit); and, b.) clean and disinfected the equipment between residents and minimize the potential spread of infection to residents for 1 of 2 nurses observed during medication pass on 1 of 2 units (100 Unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/24/21 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #288's room with signage posted on the door frame indicating that the room was a COHORT 4 / Admit or Readmit room with a handwritten date of 3/26/2021. (COHORT 4 include new admissions/re-admissions who are not vaccinated and require 14 days quarantine). The sign reflected pictures of the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required in the room, which included: Gloves + Isolation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly handle potentially hazardous food and maintain the dry storage area in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food-borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/24/21 from 9:01 AM until 9:59 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Dietary Director (DD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. In the reach-in refrigerator, on the second shelf, a container of French vanilla creamer was not labeled or dated. The DD stated, There is a sticker, but no date. 2. In the dry storage area, there was a Rubbermaid bin with a dry bread-like substance with no label or date. The DD stated, I just put this stuff in there; and it should be labeled and dated. 3. In the dry storage area, on the second shelf, a box of plastic spoons and a box of plastic knives were opened and exposed. When asked if the boxes should be opened, the DD replied, No. 4. In the prep refrigerator, wrapped meat, which was identified as turkey bacon, was labeled use by 3/19/21. The DD stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$561,530 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $198,660 — penalty dated 2024-12-20
  • $362,870 — penalty dated 2024-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 28 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
2 of 5Haverhill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 2 of 5Port Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterNewburyport, MA 2 of 5Rossville Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Elms Rehab And Healthcare Center Of CranburyCranbury, NJ 2 of 5Village Green Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBristol, CT 2 of 5Wynwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCinnaminson, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At Daughters OClifton, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At WashingtonSewell, NJ 3 of 5Masconomet Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTopsfield, MA 3 of 5Nemasket Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMiddleborough, MA 3 of 5Oak Knoll Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterFramingham, MA 3 of 5Roland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBaltimore, MD 4 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At MaywoodMaywood, NJ 4 of 5Cedar Grove Respiratory And Nursing CenterWilliamstown, NJ 4 of 5Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterDanvers, MA 4 of 5Meadowbrook Respiratory And Nursing CenterMatawan, NJ 4 of 5Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterLittle Egg Harbor Tw, NJ 4 of 5Shrewsbury Rehabilitation And Nursing At SouthgateShrewsbury, MA 4 of 5Sippican Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMarion, MA 4 of 5Suffield House Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenteSuffield, CT 4 of 5Towson Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 5 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare At West DeptforWest Deptford, NJ 5 of 5Birchwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCranford, NJ 5 of 5Bride Brook Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterNiantic, CT 5 of 5Manchester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterManchester, CT 5 of 5Pendleton Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterMystic, CT 5 of 5Vernon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterVernon, CT 5 of 5Waterfront Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRaritan, NJ

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MW SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2024
JMH FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
JMH FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
MLS FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
MLS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
SGS FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
SGS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
HERZKA, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
BAK, PINCHOSIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
MW SNF OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
CARTER, LUCIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
CONTI, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
GOLDBERGER, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
HASENPAT, KARYNELLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
SONNENSCHEIN, MOSHEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
MALT FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2024
SGS 2010 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2024
TYH 2017 TRUSTOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2024
ISAAC, CHAIMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
467 COOPER STREET REALTY URBAN RENEWAL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2025
COOPER FRENEAU REALTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.7M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 49%Other / private 31%

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$498per resident / day
operating cost
$15,130per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$559per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315521. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next