Port Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 515 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 305 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 121.6 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards of food safety to prevent the possible spread of foodborne illness in at risk residents. Specifically, 1. a. The facility failed to ensure food stored in the walk-in refrigerator was not stored and available after the use by date, b. The facility failed to ensure a loaf of bread was not stored after the use by date on one of three nourishments kitchens, and 2. Dietary Staff #1 a. failed to contain facial hair with a beard cover while in the food distribution area. Dietary Staff #1 failed to change his gloves and perform hand hygiene after resting his gloved hands on his facial hair and his nose and proceeded to pick up plate pallets and place them on multiple meal trays in preparation for the meal service line, potentially contaminating the meal trays. b. Dietary Staff #2 failed to properly dispose of used gloves during the lunch meal distribution. Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided in accordance with standards in quality of care for one Resident (#12), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #12, who has a known risk and care planned for the risk of bruising, bleeding and skin tears, the facility failed to identify areas of injury on his/her lower right leg. Findings include:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses that include, but are not limited to unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, delusional disorders and heart disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/16/25, indicated Resident #12 had a staff assessment for mental status that indicated Resident #12 as having severe cognitive impairment. Further, the MDS indicated Resident #12 required substantial/maximal assistance for shower/bathing and was dependent on lower body dressing. During an observation on 8/26/25 at 10:35 A.M., Resident #12 was in his/her bed. Resident #12's lower legs were exposed, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards in managing and caring for urinary catheter devices for one Resident (#54) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the urinary catheter drainage bag was not directly touching the floor.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, revised August 2022, indicated:-The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections.-Infection Control: Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor.Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including obstructive uropathy (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked) and dementia.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/18/25, indicated Resident #54 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15. This MDS also indicated Resident #54 had an indwelling urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#12), out of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition, out of a total sample of 25 residents, that a severe weight loss experienced by Resident #12 was addressed timely. Specifically, Resident #12's documented weight on 6/3/25 was 126.2 pounds and on 7/2/25 Resident #12's documented weight was 112.4 pounds, which is a body weight loss of 11.22 percent, which meets the criteria for severe weight loss. The clinical record failed to indicate a weight was retaken to confirm the weight loss, and the Registered Dietitian (RD) failed to conduct a nutritional assessment timely. A nutritional assessment by the RD was conducted 7/16/25, which was 14 days after Resident #12 experienced severe weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled Weight Assessment and Interventions with a revision dated March 2022 included but not limited to the following:Residents weights are monitored for undesirable or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC: a flexible tube inserted through a vein in one's arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart, used to deliver medications intravenously [IV]), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#110) out of a total sample of 25 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to change the PICC line dressing and measure the external length of the catheter as indicated in the physician's orders. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, dated as revised October 2024, indicated the following:-The purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter- related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled or wet dressings.-1. Assess central venous access devices with each infusion and at least daily:-2. Measure the length of the external central vascular access device with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#26) out of sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen administration. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated as Revised October 2010, indicated the following:-Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident #26 was admitted in May 2025 with diagnoses that include gastrointestinal hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure, muscle weakness and pressure ulcer stage 3. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/12/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS further indicated the use of continuous oxygen therapy. On 8/26/25 at 8:02 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #26 awake in bed. The Resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#41) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, The facility failed to ensure ongoing assessment of the Resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility.The facility failed to ensure an emergency kit including clamps were kept with the Resident in case of emergency related to a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (a plastic tube used for exchanging blood between a patient and a hemodialysis machine).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with', dated September 2010, indicated residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care.-If there is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a central dialysis catheter for one Resident (#41), with a central dialysis catheter port, out of a total sample of 25 residents.Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled 'Enhanced Barrier Precautions', dated December 2024, indicated: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents.-EBPs refer to infection prevention and control interventions designed to reduce the transmission of MDROs during high contact resident care activities.-EBPs apply when a resident has a wound or indwelling medical device.-indwelling medical devices include central lines, catheters, feeding tubes, and tracheostomies.-EBPs employ targeted gown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), and for one of three sampled employees (Certified Nurse Aide #1), and the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their abuse policy related to reporting of abuse allegations and employment requirements. 1) On 11/22/24, although Nurse #1 and the Charge Nurse were aware that Resident #1 had made an allegation that CNA #1 had slapped him/her on the arm during care, neither of them reported the allegation of abuse immediately to the Administrator or Director of Nurses, who were not made aware until three days later, and 2) prior to working at the facility, a Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) check was not conducted on Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, as required. Findings include: 1) The Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation, revised 10/2022, also indicated that mandated reporters have a legal obligation to report all actual, suspected or alleged cases of abuse. The Policy indicated an immediate report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (#104) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically: 1a. For Resident #104, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for a stage 3 pressure ulcer that was present on admission to the facility and, 1b. For Resident #104, the facility failed to implement bed and chair alarms as indicated in the falls plan of care. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Planning, dated as revised 4/2024, indicated the following: -Care planning schedules are developed and coordinated by the Case Manager and/ or Social Services, in collaboration with the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator and nursing department. -The care plan process is not limited to developing a written plan but also addresses the ongoing execution of care, treatment, and services with a person- centered approach. The plan is continually reevaluated and modified to ensure the resident's needs are met. The plan includes: -Integrating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA