Suffield House Rehabilitation And Healthcare Cente

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 243 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 147 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 122.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who had a known history of forward leaning posture, impaired sitting balance, fatigue in the afternoon, and required staff assistance for transfers, was protected from falling forward from the wheelchair during a staff assisted transfer. This failure resulted in the resident falling forward from the wheelchair, striking the head, and sustaining cervical spine fractures. The findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis and dementia.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10), used a walker and/or wheelchair within the last seven (7) days, and was dependent on staff for chair to bed and bed to chair transfers.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of four residents (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely when the facility had knowledge of an allegation of mistreatment and an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of four residents (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely when the facility had knowledge of an allegation of mistreatment and an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included heart failure and atrioventricular heart block. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident at high risk for falls, who sustained seven (7) falls since admission to the facility leading up to a fall with injury. The findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included orthopedic aftercare following an amputation and dementia. Resident #1's family member was his/her health care proxy.Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had impaired cognitive status, was disorientated to place, time and situation, had decreased awareness for safety, decreased awareness of deficits and was difficult to re-orient.The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 1:02 PM identified Resident #1 was orientated to person and confused, had episodes of bladder incontinence, was non-ambulatory and required staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to honor the resident's request to be out of bed before breakfast. The findings include: Resident #26's diagnoses included Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Disorders of Connective Tissue, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/29/24 identified Resident #26 with a self-care deficit. Staff were directed to ensure the resident was out of bed before breakfast daily. Review of a Nurse's Aide Information Sheet dated 7/24/24 directed that Resident #26 be out of bed before breakfast daily. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #26 was cognitively intact and required supervision for personal hygiene, maximum assistance with showering, and upper body dressing. A physician's order dated 12/26/24 directed that Resident# 26 be out of bed before breakfast every morning per resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 26) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure the resident was ambulated according to restorative care plan. The findings include: Resident #26's diagnoses included Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Disorders of Connective Tissue, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/29/24 identified Resident #26 with a self-care deficit. Interventions included an ambulation program which required Resident # 26 to ambulate with a platform walker in the hallway 1-2 times per day with supervision. A review of the Nurse's Aide Information Sheet dated 7/24/24 indicated Resident #26 was on a Restorative Ambulation Program which included supervised ambulation with a rolling platform walker. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #26 was cognitively intact and required supervision for personal hygiene, maximum assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based clinical record review, review of policy and interviews for 1 of 1 resident ( Resident #110) who required a when needed medication for palpitation, the facility failed to ensure the when needed medication was administered in accordance with physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #110 had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #110 was cognitively intact and independent with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/17/24 identified Resident #110 had an alteration in cardiac status related to atrial fibrillation, hypertension and mitral valve regurgitation. Interventions directed to monitor for signs and symptoms of cardiopulmonary distress including chest pain and administer medications as ordered. The physician's orders dated 12/1/24 directed Diltiazem HCL Extended Release 240 mg by mouth one time a day for atrial fibrillation and Diltiazem HCl 30 Milligram (MG) by mouth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical reviews, review of facility documentation, policy reviews and interviews for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for Accidents for ( Resident # 59), the facility failed to apply footrest to the resident's wheelchair according to the plan of care to prevent an accident and for (Resident # 78), the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring assistance with transfers was free from accidents resulting in an injury. The findings included: 1. Resident #59 's diagnoses included displaced avulsion fracture, difficulty walking and spinal stenosis lumbar region without neurogenic claudication. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MD) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 as cognitively intact and noted the resident required maximal assistance with bed mobility. The assessment identified dependent from chair to bed and toilet with transfers. Additionally, the assessment noted the utilization of a manual wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/19/24 for potential/ actual alteration in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and interview for 1 of l resident (Resident # 223) at risk for dehydration, the facility failed to consistently monitor the resident's intake and output per policy. The findings include: Resident #223's diagnosis includes End Stage Renal Disease. The Dietary Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #223's daily (24 hour) fluid needs of 1440 Cubic Centimeter (CC). A physician's order dated 1/27/24 at 9:03 PM directed to monitor Intake and output every shift for 3 days or until the goal has been met and laboratory blood work orders are reviewed by the physician or Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN). The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #223 was cognitively intact and received transfusions and specialized services while not a resident A review of Resident # 223's Comprehensive Intake and Output Record dated 1/28/23 through 2/20/23 identified 9 missing entries from 1/28/23 through 2/13/23, 5 missing entries from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from staff abuse. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included fracture of the left leg, dementia and major depressive disorder. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was only oriented to person (not place or time), had limited range of motion due to left hip surgical repair and required a mechanical lift and wheelchair. The accident and incident form (A & I) dated 8/10/23 at 8:00 AM identified Resident #1 became combative and agitated with staff on 8/9/23 - 8/10/23 during the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift and was attempting to strike at staff. NA #1 and LPN #2 were in the resident's room when the charge nurse, LPN #1, heard yelling and went to the room to help. She identified she heard NA #1 repeatedly telling the resident you have the wrong aid and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and facility policy for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain management, (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified when a resident requested pain medication and the next dose of pain medication was not yet due. The findings include: Resident #1's had diagnoses included lumbar spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] for lumbar spinal stenosis,and underwent lumbar spine surgery. Review of the Resident Care Plan dated 5/17/24 identified an actual self-care deficit related to cognitive impairment, decreased strength/endurance, pain, and recent surgery with interventions that directed to an assist of one with activities of daily living observing back precautions, to avoid repetitive bending, lifting and twisting and monitor for pain, stiffness, decreased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and facility policy for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain management, (Resident #1), the facility failed to address a resident's complaints of pain . The findings included: Resident #1's had diagnoses included lumbar spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] for lumbar spinal stenosis, underwent lumbar spine surgery. Review of the Resident Care Plan dated 5/17/24 identified an actual self-care deficit related to cognitive impairment, decreased strength/endurance, pain, and recent surgery. Interventions directed to an assist of one with activities of daily living observing back precautions, to avoid repetitive bending, lifting and twisting and monitor for pain, stiffness, decreased range of motion or worsening, contracture status during all care, and report changes. Review of the Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT