No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedar Grove Respiratory And Nursing Center

1420 South Black Horse Pike, Williamstown, NJ 08094 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (856) 875-0100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (856) 875-0100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Advocare2.6 mi
979 N Black Horse Pike · (856) 629-5151 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1239 S Black Horse Pike · (856) 728-8717 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1840 S Black Horse Pike · (856) 723-2291 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2059 S Black Horse Pike · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1512 S Black Horse Pike · (856) 649-8683

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.8%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%8.2%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.4%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.5%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.9%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.8%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.1%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.022.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.911.111.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.2%CMS range 35.5–55.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.2–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 6.4–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.491.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
49.4%
Total nursing turnover
31.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 177.9 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-20)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During rounds on 05/15/2025 at 09:39 AM survey #2 observed the wardrobe door in room [ROOM NUMBER]-unit B peeling off with sharp edges. During an interview on 05/20/2025 at 09:25 AM with surveyor #2, the Acting Maintenance Director (AMD) said they inspect random rooms weekly. The AMD said that when they see furniture in need of repair, they order replacement furniture it can sometimes take two weeks to a month to be replaced. When asked if there should be peeling furniture in residents' rooms, the AMD said no it can be a dignity and safety issue. During an interview with surveyor #2 Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LHNA) said that there should not be any broken or peeling furniture in residents' rooms and that they are working on replacing all furniture that is not in good repair to provide a homelike environment. A review of an undated facility provided policy tilted Homelike Environment revealed, The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to administer Tube Feedings per Physician's order (PO). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #82) reviewed for receiving nutrition via Tube Feeding (TF) and was evidenced by the following: On 05/14/2025 09:08 AM, the surveyor entered Resident # 82's room and observed the resident in bed. The surveyor observed that the resident had a TF (nutrition received through a flexible tube surgically inserted into the stomach) formula hanging on a pole, attached to a TF pump, and infusing at a rate of 55 ml/hr (milliliters per hour). On 05/14/2025 at 1:04 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #82 in the bed. The surveyor further observed a TF connected to a TF pump and infusing at a rate of 55 ml/hr. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #82. According to the admission Record the resident was admitted to facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: dysphagia (a swallowing disorder) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication with an error rate of less than 5%. The surveyor observed 2 nurses administer medications for 6 residents with 33 opportunities for error. There were 3 errors resulting in an error rate of 9% as evidenced by the following: During the medication pass on 05/14/2025 from 8:00 AM until 8:55 AM, the surveyor observed the following: At 8:43 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administer a Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3) 1000 unit capsule to Resident #72. The LPN stated she is giving a capsule not a tablet. The Physician Order (PO) dated 08/31/2023 indicated to give a Cholecalciferol 1000 unit tablet; not a capsule. At 8:45 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administer a Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3) 25 micrograms capsule to Resident #45. The Physician Order (PO) dated 02/15/2024 indicated to give a Cholecalciferol 25 micrograms tablet; not a capsule. At 8:55 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a medication was secured in a locked compartment accessible only to authorized personnel with a key. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 units (C unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/14/2025 at 12:40 PM, the surveyor observed an opened 4% Lidocaine patch (pain-relief patch) on top of the dresser in room [ROOM NUMBER]A. During an interview with the surveyor on 05/19/2025 at 12:45 PM, the Director of Nursing said that the patch should not have been left on the resident's dresser and stored in a locked medication cart for safety reasons. A review of the facility's undated policy, titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revealed that, The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity, and light control. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. NJAC 8:39-29.2(d)

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility A.) failed to use appropriate infection control practices, specifically hand hygiene when providing wound care and B.) failed to implement infection control measures for the handling and storage of respiratory equipment. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 110) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury and 1 of 3 residents (Residents #9) reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 110's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) revealed under section M that he/she had a pressure ulcer. A review of Resident # 110's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under Orders revealed an order that revealed, Acetic Acid Irrigation Solution 0.25 % (Acetic Acid): Use 1 application via irrigation every day shift for Wound Care Cleanse sacrum with Acetic Acid 0.25% Solution and pat dry. Pack with Acetic Acid 0.25% gauze…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident call system was maintained in an operable condition. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 4 units (C unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/13/2025 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor observed that in bedroom [ROOM NUMBER]B, the call bell device cord was detached from the wall system. On 05/14/2025 at 12:26 PM, the surveyor observed that in bedroom [ROOM NUMBER]B, the call bell device cord was detached from the wall system. On 05/15/2025 at 9:36 AM, the surveyor observed that in bedroom [ROOM NUMBER]B, the call bell device cord was detached from the wall system. During an interview with the surveyor on 05/19/2025 at 12:45 PM, the Director of Nursing said that the call bell cords need to be securely attached to the wall system for safety reasons. A review of the facility's undated policy, titled, Call System, Residents, revealed that, The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ 167523 Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physicial abuse by another resident for one (Resident (R) 19) of nine residents reviewed for abuse. R23 approached R19, while the resident was in her bathroom and hit R19's back, neck, and shoulders. R19 sustained pain and fear during the altercation. Finding include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated July 2023 indicated .It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse . 'Abuse' means the willful inflection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations . 'Willful' means the individual must have acted deliberately,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/03/2023 from 08:32 to 09:04 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Dietary Director (DD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. On an upper shelf under the refrigeration unit of the walk-in refrigerator, an opened box contained individual packets of [NAME] Sour Cream. The packets had a use by date of [DATE]. The DD removed the box of individual sour cream packets to the trash. 2. On a lower shelf of the walk-in refrigerator, a sheet pan contained a package of ground beef pulled from the freezer to defrost. The ground beef had a pull date of 4/27/23 and a use by date of 5/2/2023, a period of 6 days. The DD stated, Its garbage, we should only go 5 days after pull from freezer. On 5/09/2023 at 12:16 PM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to create a homelike environment during dining by not removing food from serving trays. The deficient practice was observed in the facility's main dining room and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 05/03/2023 at 12:06 PM, the surveyor observed the main dining room at the lunch meal. 8 residents were present at various tables. 8 of 8 residents were observed to be eating their lunch meal from a plastic tray. 2. On 05/08/2023 at 12:06 PM, the surveyor observed the main dining room at the lunch meal. 11 of 11 residents present in the dining room were observed eating their lunch meal from a plastic tray. The facility did not provide a policy or procedure for dining pertaining to not serving residents on trays in the dining room. N.J.A.C. 8:39-4.1(a)(12)

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to contain oxygen/nebulizer delivery systems in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #120) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/03/2023 at 09:59 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #120 lying in bed while receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. Resident #120 stated that he/she wore received oxygen continuously. On 05/09/2023 at 08:40 AM, Resident #120 was observed sitting up in bed eating breakfast. The nebulizer mask was in the top drawer of the opened bedside table. The mask was uncovered and exposed. Portable oxygen was observed to be in a back pocket of the resident's wheelchair. The oxygen tubing was hanging from the push handle and was exposed while not in use. On 05/09/2023 at 01:57 PM Resident #120 was observed seated in their wheelchair in their room. The nebulizer mask was observed in the top drawer of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) to maintain a detailed record of receipts and accurate reconciliation of controlled medications for 7 of 7 Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) 222 forms (a form used for ordering controlled substances)and b.) failed to ensure that controlled drugs are reconciled in accordance with facility policy and professional nursing standards on 1 of 5 SHIFT to SHIFT CONTROLLED MEDICATION COUNT LOG (B Unit, Cart #1). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) On 05/11/2023 at 09:22 AM, Surveyor #1 requested all of the DEA 222 forms for the last six (6) months from the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON provided Surveyor #1 with seven (7) DEA 222 forms. Surveyor #1 reviewed the DEA 222 forms and found seven of seven forms were not completed and accurately documented as follows: 1. DEA 222 form #221418084 was written on 12/22//22 and contained an order for 1 package of 20 Oxycodone IR (Immediate release) 5 milligram (mg), 1 package of 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ Complaint: #NJ00160866 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the prescriber's orders and accepted professional standards and principles by administering medications past the required time frame. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for being free of significant med errors. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #108's quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 02/27/2023, revealed that Resident #108 had a brief interview of mental status score of 15 which indicated he/she was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #108's physician's orders revealed the following orders but not limited to Digoxin tablet 250mcg (micrograms, medication used to manage and treat heart failure) one time a day and to hold for a heart rate greater than 60 beats per minute, lisinopril (medication used to treat high blood pressure) tablet 2.5mg (milligrams) one time a day, furosemide (medication used to manage and treat heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to store a biological (Tubersol INJ [injection], used to aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection [TB]) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 5 medication carts inspected. On 05/11/2023 at 10:11 AM, the B-Wing Medication Cart #1 was inspected, by the surveyor, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). Upon opening the bottom right-hand drawer, the surveyor observed an unopened box of house stock Tubersol INJ (Injectable) 5/0.1 ML (Milliters) manufactured by [company name]. A label affixed to the outside of the box indicated Refrigerate, Do Not Freeze, as well as an image of a refrigerator and the word REFRIGERATE written in bold letters next to the image. At the time of the observation, LPN #1 stated that she was unsure of how long the Tubersol had been in the drawer. On the same day at 10:53 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM #1) replied, in the fridge when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide all the items that were on the menu. This deficient practice occurred during one lunch meal that was observed in the main dining room and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 05/09/2023 at 11:48 AM, during the lunch meal in the main dining room, the surveyor observed 12 residents were present in the dining room. According to the menu, residents were to receive a slice of apple pie at the lunch meal on 05/09/2023. The surveyor observed 12/12 residents in the main dining room receive strawberry ice cream for dessert at the lunch meal instead of apple pie. The surveyor interviewed resident #39 during the lunch meal observation. Resident #39 stated to the surveyor when he pointed out that they were provided strawberry ice cream instead of apple pie, Sometimes we get a piece of cake that is pink and sometimes we get strawberry ice cream, but we never get strawberry shortcake. The surveyor then told the resident that the dessert for the lunch meal was apple pie on 05/09/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide access to the call system while a resident was in bed. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #423) investigated under the Environment Task. On 05/03/2023 at 09:40 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #423 asleep in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call system on the floor adjacent to the bed. On 05/11/2023 at 09:56 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #423 awake in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call system on the floor adjacent to the bed. On the same date at 10:00 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, Resident #423 said the handheld call system is on the floor sometimes and makes it difficult to get care. He/She stated that he/she leaves the door open so the staff can hear him/her. A review of Resident #423's Care Plan located in the Electronic Medical Record, revealed that he/she is at risk for falls. The Care Plan revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan (CP) or develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan in a timely manner a) addressing the placement and care of hand mitts on left/right hands (Resident #23), b) addressing the use, care, cleaning and storage of a nebulizer (a machine that delivers aerosol medication into the lungs) (Resident #126), and c) failure to develop a hospice care plan in a timely manner for a resident enrolled and disenrolled in hospice services (Resident #69) . This deficient practice was observed for 3 of 33 residents reviewed and was evidenced by the following: a) On 2/11/2022 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #23 in bed, on a ventilator with a tracheostomy in place. At that time, the surveyor noted a left-hand Posey mitt in place, (Posey Mitts are used to help protect patients who are prone to disrupting medical treatment or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-23 · tag F0888 — pattern
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to A) develop and implement a policy to track facility staff vaccination status to ensure all eligible staff were vaccinated by the required dates and B) follow their own policy for contingency plans by not ensuring unvaccinated staff wore an N 95 mask to mitigate the potential spread of COVID-19. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/11/22 during entrance conference, the facility was asked to provide a matrix of the vaccination status of all their staff. The facility provided a sheet of paper, separated by department, and listed the number of total vaccinated and unvaccinated staff. The paper did not identify or specify which facility staff were vaccinated or unvaccinated. A.) A review of the facility provided matrix on 2/16/22, revealed 25 new hire employees from November of 2021 to February 2022. Of those 25 new hire employees, 8 are no longer on the schedule, 6 have pending exemptions, and 11 were unvaccinated. During an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to refer Resident #14 to the appropriate state-designated authority for level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Level II PASARR. On 2/11/2022 at 2:21 PM the surveyor reviewed Resident #14's electronic and paper record. According to the admission record Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: injury of cauda equina (a sack of nerve roots at the lower end of the spinal cord), suicidal ideations, schizoaffective disorder (a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder, such as depression or bipolar disorder), schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A further review of the medical record revealed a positive Level I screen for mental illness (MI) for the diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and depression documented on PASARR Level I Screen, dated 10/20/2021. Further review of the Level I screen revealed that within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan when there was a change in the medication regime for 1 of 33 sampled residents, (Resident # 58). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the ventilatory unit on 2/11/22 at 10:40 AM, Resident #58 was observed lying in bed with their tracheostomy connected to a mechanical ventilator with their eyes closed. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to; acute and chronic respiratory failure, and anoxic brain damage (lack of oxygen to the brain). A review of an Order Summary Report dated active orders as of 2/16/22, did not include an order for anticoagulant medication (a blood thinning medication). On 2/14/22 at 1:35 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #58's Care Plan that revealed a focus area of I am at risk for bleeding secondary to the use of anticoagulant therapy for Deep Vein Thrombosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of clinical practice in accordance with the New Jersey Board of Nursing Statutes by not maintaining medication records that were complete with staff signatures for 2 of 33 residents reviewed (Resident # 9 and Resident #75). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The nurse practice act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary nail care to maintain proper grooming and personal hygiene. The deficient practice was observed for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, (Resident #99 and Resident #92). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A) During the initial tour of the facility on 2/11/22 at 10:13 AM, surveyor #6 observed Resident #99 in their room. At that time, the surveyor observed Resident #99's fingernails on his/her right hand. The nails were chipped, long, and had unidentified matter underneath the nails. On 2/14/22 at 9:19 AM, surveyor #6 observed Resident #99 in their room and the fingernails on his/her right hand remained uncut and still contained matter underneath the nails. At that time, surveyor #6 observed that the left-hand fingernails also had unidentified matter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had physician's orders for ongoing care and protocols for a Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a Foley, (Resident #477). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 2/11/22 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #477 in bed. A Foley catheter drainage bag was on the floor with a tube ascending towards the resident. A review of Resident #477's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed under, Medical Diagnosis that he/she had a diagnosis of but not limited to, Focal Traumatic Brain Injury (localized damage to the brain from direct mechanical forces), and a Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. A review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated for 1/29/22, revealed Resident #477 had an indwelling catheter. A review of the EMR under, Orders did not include any physician's orders for the Foley…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately and consistently monitor an enteral tube feeding administration pump free water flush in accordance with physician's orders. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #149) reviewed for tube feeding and was evidenced by the following: On 2/11/2022 at 10:50 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #149 lying in bed with the head of bed elevated. The surveyor observed the following from the enteral pump screen: Resident #149 was actively receiving a tube feed of Jevity 1.5 (a type of nutritional formula) infusing at 60 milliliters per hour (ml/hr). In addition, Resident #149 was receiving an autoflush (water flush) at 60 ml q (every) hour. The enteral water bag was labeled 2/10 and had a hang time of 6 PM. On 2/14/2022 at 8:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #149's in progress enteral feeding. The tube feed was infusing at 60 ml/hr via pump of Jevity 1.5 and the autoflush was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored properly when not in use, to reduce the risk of infection for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory equipment, (Resident #126). The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 2/11/2022 at 11:20 AM, during the initial tour of the B Unit, the surveyor observed a nebulizer machine on top of Resident #126's four drawered dresser. The dry nebulizer mask was exposed, connected to the dry medication cup, and the tubing was connected to the nebulizer machine. The mask was resting on top of a TV remote control, and a tan rolled bandage. The equipment was unlabeled and undated. During an interview at that time, the resident stated the nebulizer was for her to use when she got winded. The resident further stated that the nurse placed the nebulizer on the dresser. On 2/15/2022 at 09:42 AM, the surveyor observed a nebulizer machine on top of the resident's four drawered dresser. The dry nebulizer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to document that topical pain medication was administered as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain management, (Resident #75) and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #75 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included arthritis. A review of review the Order Summary Report revealed a physician's order dated 12/9/2021 for the resident to receive Voltaren Gel 1% (a topical pain medication) Apply to B/L (bilateral) knees topically two times a day for pain. A review of the electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) for Resident #75 for January and February 2022, revealed the pain medication Voltaren Gel with scheduled administration times of 0900 (9:00 AM) and 2100 (9:00 PM). On the following dates and times, there was no documentation to indicate that the medication was administered as ordered on: 1/2/2022 at 2100 1/3/2022 at 0900 and 2100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently communicate with a contracted dialysis facility according to facility policy and procedure. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/1/21, revealed Resident #50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13/15, indicating that he/she was cognitively intact. According to section I of the MDS, Resident #50 had an active diagnosis of end stage renal disease and section O revealed that Resident #50 received dialysis while a resident. According to the Order Summary Report, Active Orders As Of: 2/22/2022, Resident #50 had an order, dated 11/26/2021 for: Dialysis treatment 3 times a week on M-W-F Pick-up at 800 am. On 2/17/2022 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #50's dialysis communication book for the period of 12/24/2021 up to and including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) received 12 hours of mandatory education training, annually as required. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 CNA files reviewed and was evidenced by the following: On 02/17/22 at 10:09 AM, the surveyor obtained and reviewed the performance evaluations and continuing education (CE) records of five randomly selected CNA staff members from the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Upon review of the records, the surveyor noted the following: 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants had no annual education for 2021. On 02/17/22 at 12:30 PM, the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) stated they did not have the required annual education for 1 of the 5 CNA's the surveyor requested for 2021. When asked who was responsible to make sure the required yearly education was completed, she stated she and the ADON were responsible to make sure it was completed. On 02/18/22 at 08:53 AM, the surveyor interviewed the ADON regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the recommendation identified by the Consultant Pharmacist. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #75) reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #75 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included arthritis. A review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 2/17/2022, revealed a physician's order dated 12/9/2021 for the resident to receive Voltaren Gel 1% (a topical pain medication) Apply to B/L (bilateral) knees topically two times a day for pain. A review of the Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review Active Recommendations Lacking Final Response dated 1/16/2022, indicated please update Voltaren gel order with number of grams to be applied. Upon review of the January and February 2022 Treatment Administration Record of Resident # 75 the facility did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to A.) ensure a used syringe left in a plastic cup on a bedside table was placed into a puncture proof container, B.) ensure a peripheral venous catheter (PVC) (medical tube placed into a peripheral vein for venous access to administer intravenous medications) had a protective sterile cap (an antimicrobial impregnated plastic device) applied when it was not in use to prevent exposing the access device to the environment and C.) failed to maintain contact isolation for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for Infection Control (Resident #477, Resident #169 and Resident # 103). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) During the initial tour of the facility on 2/11/22 at 10:40 AM, surveyor #6 observed a used syringe with a depressed plunger placed inside a plastic cup on the bedside table in Resident #477's room. During an interview with surveyor #6 on 2/16/22 at 10:21 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager Nurse (LPNUM #2) revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to A.) implement a system to review antibiotic (medicine used against bacteria) use with the consultant pharmacist by failing to obtain monthly reports documenting potential areas of improvement, irregularities, and recommendations and B.) failed to implement ongoing education on the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (program to improve clinical outcomes and minimize harms by improving antibiotic prescribing). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During an interview with the surveyor on 2/16/22 at 10:21 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPNUM #2) revealed she is not sure what Antibiotic Stewardship is. LPNUM #2 revealed that when the facility obtains a new order for an antibiotic, there is nothing specific to do. During an interview with the surveyor on 2/16/22 at 1:01 PM, the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) stated she could not provide the consultant pharmacist monthly report. When the surveyor asked if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-02-23 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with the required beneficiary notices for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification (Resident #41 and Resident #160). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/17/22 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review (SNFBPNR) completed by the facility for Resident #41. The SNFBPNR indicated that Resident #41 last covered Medicare day was 4/10/22 and the resident remained in the building. The SNFBPNR further revealed that a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage-Form CMS 10123 (NOMNC) was not provided to Resident #41. On 2/17/22 at 8:38 AM, the surveyor reviewed the SNFBPNR completed by the facility for Resident #160. The SNFBPNR indicated that Resident #160's last covered Medicare day was 4/20/22 and the resident remained in the building. The SNFBPNR further revealed that a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage-Form CMS 10123 (NOMNC) was not provided to Resident #160. During an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-02-23 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment Minimum Data Set (SCSA-MDS) using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), an assessment tool, process on a resident who elected hospice benefits. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #69) reviewed for hospice and end of life. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the most recent admission Record, Resident #69 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: encounter for palliative care, polymyalgia rheumatica, fibromyalgia, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. On [DATE] at 11:19 AM during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #69 lying in bed. Resident #69 appeared clean and neat and no signs or symptoms of pain or shortness of breath were observed. Resident #69 was pleasantly confused and stated to the surveyor, I'm leaving. My mom just died. On [DATE] at 2:23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 28 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
2 of 5Atlas Post Acute At Woodbury Country ClubWoodbury, NJ 2 of 5Haverhill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 2 of 5Port Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterNewburyport, MA 2 of 5Rossville Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Elms Rehab And Healthcare Center Of CranburyCranbury, NJ 2 of 5Village Green Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBristol, CT 2 of 5Wynwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCinnaminson, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At Daughters OClifton, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At WashingtonSewell, NJ 3 of 5Masconomet Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTopsfield, MA 3 of 5Nemasket Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMiddleborough, MA 3 of 5Oak Knoll Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterFramingham, MA 3 of 5Roland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBaltimore, MD 4 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At MaywoodMaywood, NJ 4 of 5Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterDanvers, MA 4 of 5Meadowbrook Respiratory And Nursing CenterMatawan, NJ 4 of 5Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterLittle Egg Harbor Tw, NJ 4 of 5Shrewsbury Rehabilitation And Nursing At SouthgateShrewsbury, MA 4 of 5Sippican Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMarion, MA 4 of 5Suffield House Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenteSuffield, CT 4 of 5Towson Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 5 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare At West DeptforWest Deptford, NJ 5 of 5Birchwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCranford, NJ 5 of 5Bride Brook Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterNiantic, CT 5 of 5Manchester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterManchester, CT 5 of 5Pendleton Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterMystic, CT 5 of 5Vernon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterVernon, CT 5 of 5Waterfront Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRaritan, NJ

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GARDENVIEW OPCO HOLDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2020
BAK, PINCHOSIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF34%since 02/01/2020
GOLDBERGER, SHLOMOIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF33%since 02/01/2020
SONNENSCHEIN, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF33%since 02/01/2020
GARDENVIEW MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
CONTI, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
SEEVE, ELIEZERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
TRICKETT, VIRGINIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
ISAAC, CHAIMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
CEDAR GROVE PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
MALT FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
MEADOW HEIGHTS REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2025
SGS 2010 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
TYH 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$27.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.8M
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 15%Other / private 12%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$432per resident / day
operating cost
$13,133per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$441per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315257. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next