No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Roland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

4669 Falls Road, Baltimore, MD 21209 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (410) 662-8606 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 20181 immediate-jeopardy citation$52,359 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2018
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $52,359 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-24)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4419 Falls Rd · (410) 366-1101 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4625 Falls Rd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1020 W 41st St · (410) 554-3730 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1413 W Old Cold Spring Ln · (443) 850-7720

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.2%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms33.8%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%22.2%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.2%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.7%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.7%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.8%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%9.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.951.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.281.201.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.3%CMS range 50.4–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.3–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.9–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
40.0%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 118.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-20)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2020-03-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of Resident #10 with known wandering, aggressive, and inappropriate behaviors to ensure the safety of Resident #10 and other residents. This finding was evident during the review of multiple complaints for 4 of 4 residents(#5, # 8, #7, and #1 ) on the 3rd floor.The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that concerns met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy and the facility was notified in writing of this determination at 3:10 PM on 2/19/26.The findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed diagnoses including unspecified dementia with unspecified severity with agitation. On 8/24/24 Resident #10 was certified incapable of making any medical decisions secondary to cognitive impairments. Resident #10 was seen by psychiatry on 12/8/25 secondary to assaulting another resident. At that time s/he was assessed as having Vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for Residents. This finding was found to be evident during the tour of the facility for review of the physical environment.The findings include: On 4/14/26 at 8:19AM during an initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed dark patches all over the bedroom floor. The vinyl chair cover was also torn in 3 different places, measuring about 1x6, 1x8 and 1x3 inches respectively. In room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom, the floor vinyl behind the toilet, extending all the way to the bathroom sink and measuring about 3 x1.5 feet was raised and coming/peeling off. Behind the entrance door to room [ROOM NUMBER], the vinyl siding (Cove base) measuring about one foot long was observed hanging off the wall. In an interview with the maintenance director on 4/16/26 at 11:44 AM he was asked how things needing repair were brought to his attention and how he keeps the building maintained. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) written information was provided to a resident's representative regarding the facility's bed hold policy, and 2) written notice of the transfer was provided to a resident's representative upon transfer to the hospital and 3) failed to provide timely notification to the facility's Ombudsman when Residents transferred to the hospital. This was evident for 3 (Resident #3, #13, and #73) out of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge process.The findings include:1) On 04/14/2026 at 9:12 AM, review of Resident #3's medical record revealed he/she was sent to the hospital on 2/11/2026. At the same time, further review of Resident #3's medical record revealed a document titled, Bed Hold Agreement, dated 2/11/26 which had hand written wording of, consent over the phone, and a signature below it on the bottom of the document. On 04/16/2026 at 11:29 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that if a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Residents received the posted menu meal timely and the meal ticket matched the provided meal on Resident trays. This finding was found to be evident in 10 (Resident #80, #123, 6, 31, 60, 77, 91, 92, 100 and 111) out of 10 Residents reviewed for food and nutrition services.The findings include:In an interview with Resident #80 at 11:10 AM on 4/14/2026 the Resident stated that the food was awful, there were not enough portions, and the meal on the tray did not match the meal ticket. Resident further stated that he/she was supposed to get 2 juices and double portions of the meal, but he/she only received 1 juice and not enough portions of the meal. The surveyor reviewed Resident #80's meal ticket for breakfast on 4/14/2026 which the Resident had laying on the overbed table and the meal ticket indicated give 2 juices, entree x2 portions.In an interview with Resident #123 at 11:20 AM on 4/14/2026 the Resident stated that the food was not good and that there was not enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for sanitation and food service safety. This finding was found to be evident in the kitchen and on the Mount [NAME] Nursing Unit during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On tour of the facility's kitchen on 4/14/2026 at 7:10 AM with 3 dietary employees (#7, #8 and #11) in attendance the surveyor observed sanitation concerns: 1) employee's personal items - pink mug, foil wrapped food, and bottle of water on the small utility cart, 2) no running water in one of the hand sinks and standing water not draining in the other hand sink, 3) hole in the wall by the kitchen window where the telephone had fallen off the wall, 4) reach-in refrigerator missing documentation of temperature readings for 4/12 and 4/13, 5) food items not dated in the walk-in freezer - cardboard box of sandwich slices and waffles opened not dated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a Resident. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #119) out of 1 Resident reviewed for anticoagulant medication usage. The findings include:Anticoagulants or blood thinners are medications that prevent blood clots from forming or growing by inhibiting clotting factors. The primary side effect of anticoagulants is increased bleeding, requiring careful monitoring. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment is a standardized, federally mandated clinical assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid- certified nursing homes to evaluate Resident functional capabilities, health needs, and preferences. The MDS assessment drives care planning, quality monitoring, and reimbursement, with assessments conducted upon admission, quarterly, annually, and upon significant status changes. The MDS assessment is completed by licensed health care professionals in nursing homes. Data is submitted electronically to state databases.Care Plan is a written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received quarterly care plan meetings. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed for care planning.The findings include:On 04/14/2026 at 8:01 AM, an interview with Resident #6 revealed that they were unaware of the last care plan meeting they had, but that it had been a while. On 04/14/2026 at 12:36 PM, review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the last documented care plan meeting was 7/30/2025.On 04/16/2026 at 9:08 AM, an interview with the Social Services Director (Staff #9) revealed that care plan meetings were done quarterly after each quarterly comprehensive assessment. The surveyor requested documentation of the last care plan meeting for Resident #6.On 04/16/2026 at 12:57 PM, review of the last care plan meeting note provided by the facility was dated 7/30/2025. Staff #9 had no further documentation that would indicate a care plan meeting was held since 7/30/2025.On 04/16/2026 at 1:34 PM, the surveyor reviewed the concern with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide communication tools for a resident who is unable to communicate appropriately. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for language and communication during the annual survey.The findings includeOn 4/14/2026 at 11:07 AM Resident #12 was observed on a wheelchair to the right side of the bed in their room. The bed was between the wheelchair where the resident was sitting and the nightstand. The resident is alert and oriented. In his neck is a trach stoma, a surgical opening in the neck to facilitate breathing. An oxygen (o2) humidifier was attached to the trach site. The resident can only mouth words, so it was difficult to understand all they were trying to say. There is no communication board in sight or at the bedside. The surveyor was trying to communicate with the resident but was unable to read lips or understand everything the resident was trying to say. The surveyor requested to speak with the resident's nurse.On 4/14/2026 at 11:22 AM In an Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interviews, facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, a vulnerable, cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls, from experiencing a fall that resulted in a major injury. This was evident for 1(Resident #1) of 64 residents reviewed during the annual survey.The findings included:On 04/14/2026 at 8:57 AM: During the initial observation, a blue fall mat was observed on the floor, located just behind the curtain upon entering Resident #1's room.On 04/16/2026 at 8:46 AM: A record review of Resident #1's progress notes from 6/24/2025 at 8:11 AM revealed a fall had occurred. The documentation stated that a nurses' aide on the 11-7 shift informed the nurse that, while providing morning care and turning the resident on their side for cleanup, the aide could not control the resident and lowered them to the floor. The resident was helped back to bed, assessed, and no injuries were noted at that time; the physician was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain appropriate respiratory care and services. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #27 and #66) out of 2 Residents reviewed for oxygen usage.The findings include:Oxygen concentrators are FDA-regulated medical devices that filter nitrogen from ambient air to deliver concentrated, high purity oxygen to Residents with chronic lung conditions. They offer a continuous, non-refillable supply of oxygen for home or portable use. Oxygen concentrators pull in surrounding air, compress it, remove nitrogen, and deliver purified oxygen through a nasal cannula or mask. A prescription is required.At 11:42 AM on 4/14/2026 the surveyor observed Resident #27 in bed in no distress with an oxygen concentrator at the bedside with oxygen in use. There was no no smoking/oxygen in use signage on the Resident door or the door frame that indicated oxygen was in use.At 12:05 PM on 4/14/2026 the surveyor observed Resident #66 in bed in no distress with an oxygen concentrator at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received pharmaceutical services to meet their needs regarding timely medication administration. This was evident for 1 (Complaint #2968846) of 5 complaints reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:Medications are ordered by the physician to meet a resident's needs. They are ordered for specific times for a reason to reflect the resident's plan of care and needs.Medications should be administered an hour prior or after the ordered/scheduled time.On 04/14/2026 at 1:02 PM, review of Complaint #2968846 revealed a concern that medications were not administered to Resident #136 timely based on the order.On 04/14/2026 at 1:14 PM, review of Resident #136's medical record revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 2/14/2026.On 04/16/2026 at 11:24 AM, review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) Audit for January 2026- February 2026 requested by the surveyor revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. This finding was found to be evident in review of the outside dumpster area during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: The surveyor toured the outside dumpster area at 1:17 PM on 4/16/2026 with the Floor Technician in attendance. There were 2 dumpsters for trash and garbage and 1 dumpster for recyclables. Outside of the trash dumpster was multiple pieces of trash lying on the ground, a bag of trash behind the dumpster and the trash dumpster was not closed with the attached lid on top of the dumpster. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) was notified of the concern with the outside dumpster area at 1:50 PM on 4/16/2026. At 6:45 AM on 4/17/2026 the surveyor followed up on the outside dumpster area with the Housekeeping Manager in attendance. Observed on the ground outside the dumpster was multiple pieces of trash, an empty large can of beans, empty juice cups, plastic gloves, and paper towels. At 8:45 AM on 4/17/2026 the Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for a Resident. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #27) out of 1 Resident reviewed for Resident records.The findings include:Anticoagulants or blood thinners are medications that prevent blood clots from forming or growing by inhibiting clotting factors. The primary side effect of anticoagulants is increased bleeding, requiring careful monitoring. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment is a standardized, federally mandated clinical assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid- certified nursing homes to evaluate Resident functional capabilities, health needs, and preferences. The MDS assessment drives care planning, quality monitoring, and reimbursement, with assessments conducted upon admission, quarterly, annually, and upon significant status changes. The MDS assessment is completed by licensed health care professionals in nursing homes. Data is submitted electronically to state databases.Care Plan is a written document that outlines a person's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to have a physician order for a Resident to receive Hospice care. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #73) out of 2 Residents reviewed for Hospice Services.The findings include:Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment is a standardized, federally mandated clinical assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid- certified nursing homes to evaluate Resident functional capabilities, health needs, and preferences. The MDS assessment drives care planning, quality monitoring, and reimbursement, with assessments conducted upon admission, quarterly, annually, and upon significant status changes. The MDS assessment is completed by licensed health care professionals in nursing homes. Data is submitted electronically to state databases.Care Plan is a written document that outlines a person's care needs and how they will be met. The care plan includes health information related to medical history, current treatments, medications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of pertinent documentation including the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, and survey findings, it was determined the facility staff failed to 1.) track performance to ensure improvements are realized and sustained and 2.) failed to conduct at least one Performance Improvement Plan/Project (PIP) annually that focuses on problem prone areas identified by the facility through data collection and analysis. This was evident during review of the facilities Quality Assurance program.Findings include:1.) On 04/20/2026 at 11:11 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), Staff #3, and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Staff #4, were interviewed regarding responsibility for the QAPI meeting and its operational process. Both stated that they are jointly in charge of QAPI. Staff #4 (ADON) further specified that all departments meet monthly and submit data for the QAPI meeting.When Staff #4 ADON was asked how data collected from QAPI meetings are regularly reviewed, analyzed, and acted upon, they responded by citing examples…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment of resident care was maintained in a manner that minimized the potential spread of infection as evidenced by an unwrapped toilet tissue roll placed on top of the red sharps bio-hazard container. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 64 residents investigated during the annual survey.The findings include:On 04/14/2026 at 8:33 AM during the initial observation, an unwrapped roll of white toilet tissue was observed in Resident #8's bathroom sitting on top of the red sharps container. On 04/14/2026 at 8:46 AM the unwrapped toilet tissue in Resident #8's bathroom was shown to Staff #36, Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN. Staff #36, LPN stated they would call housekeeping to dispose of the tissue on top of the sharps container.On 04/14/2026 at 9:04 AM the Director of Nursing, (DON) was made aware of the issue and verbalized understanding that unwrapped tissues on the sharps container was an infection control issue. Housekeeping later removed the tissue.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have call bells within reach of a dependent resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for language and communication during the annual survey.The findings includeOn 4/14/2026 at 11:07 AM Resident #12 was observed in a wheelchair sitting to the right side of the bed. The bed was between the wheelchair and the nightstand. The call bell was tucked away on the top drawer of the nightstand to the left and away from residents reach. The resident is alert and oriented. In his neck is a trach stoma, a surgical opening on the neck to facilitate breathing. An oxygen (o2) humidifier was attached to the trach site. The resident can only mouth words and has weaknesses to the right side. The surveyor requested to speak with the resident's nurse.On 4/14/2026 at 11:22 AM In an Interview with the residents nurse a License Practical Nurse (LPN) #25. She was asked how the resident calls for help and she said that resident can use the call bell. She was asked where the call bell was,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents and staff had a safe and comfortable environment. This was evident for 1 of 1 observation made in the facility laundry room.The findings include:On 04/17/2026 at 7:59 AM, an observation of the laundry room revealed a dryer closest to the wall in the laundry room, which had an exterior piece at the bottom that was leaning against the dryer.When the surveyor moved the exterior piece, it revealed parts of the dryer that lay below the area where items are placed to dry. Further observation of the laundry room revealed a portion of the wall to the right of the door prior to walking into the dirty laundry room from the clean laundry room which had a horizontal shaped hole in the wall, approximately 8 inches long and 2 inches wide.On 04/17/2026 at 8:03 AM, an interview with Laundry Aide (Staff #35) revealed she started at the facility about a month ago and the hole in the wall and lower part of the dryer noted above had been like that since she started.On 04/17/2026 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents. This was evident for 1 (Room # 209) of 3 resident rooms observed during review for Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment. The findings include:An interview on 2/20/26 at 11:00 AM, with Resident #2 in room [ROOM NUMBER] for complaint #2682305 revealed the facility's staff failed to ensure a sanitary and safe interior environment.The following was observed by the surveyor. The curtains had red and brown spots scattered throughout the curtains.The floors had paper trash, food and were dirty in appearance throughout.The bedside commode that was over the toilet had brown materials in all the crevices and on the seat of the commode. The bathroom had a strong smell of urine and Feces.On 2/20/26 at 11:30 AM, Administrator was made aware of the findings.On 2/20/26 at 1 PM another observation of the room revealed that the curtains had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of a complaint 2748952 regarding a planned discharge, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the receiving facility with a comprehensive discharge summary of the residents stay in the facility. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (11) reviewed for discharge.The findings include:Review of the complaint 2748952 on 2/23/26 revealed concerns related to the receiving facility not being given a discharge summary from the discharging facility and in addition not receiving all the residents' medications as discussed in pre-discharge planning according to the receiving facility. During an interview on 2/24/26 with the discharging nurse, LPN #3 revealed that she was not familiar with what to do with discharges, she wasn't sure of the process with narcotics and didn't send any with the resident to the receiving facility. She stated that she sent all the non-narcotic medication with [resident], but she wasn't clear on how to discharge a resident. The DON and ADON were then interviewed regarding the discharge with Resident # 11. In the miscellaneous section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to refer residents to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 1 residents reviewed for PASSAR during the complaint survey.The findings include:Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASARR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability; 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting); and 3) receive the services they need in those settings.On 2/20/26 at 11:00 AM, a review of Resident #2's records revealed a PASSAR Level I screening form dated 10/12/23 which indicated that the resident should have been referred for a Level II evaluation. No Level II PASSAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a process to determine if residents with a history of trauma received the appropriate trauma informed care. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 2 residents reviewed for trauma informed care.The findings include:On 2/19/26 at 8am, a review of complaint 2689128 which reported that resident #5 alleged that Resident #10 enter the room around 7 pm and grabbed both of resident's hands and was punched in the face about five time.A medical record review for Resident #5 on 2/19/26 at 8:30AM, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed no evidence that a trauma informed assessment or care plan had been completed to ensure the resident received trauma informed care after the incident.On 2/19/26 at 9 AM, an interview with Resident #5 revealed that Resident #5 was tearful and stated that I'm in fear, and afraid to go to sleep at night. I'm scared when the perpetrator walks in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the physicians failed to have their notes in the medical record timely after seeing the resident. This was evident for 1 of 1 (#10) Residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 on 2/19/26 at 9:30 AM revealed multiple visits and completions of psychiatric evaluation and consultations by a psychiatric NP, staff #8. However, a closer review of these assessments noted that the completion date and the uploaded date into the miscellaneous section of the resident's medical record were not the same, sometimes with a month in between evaluation and upload date. This concern was reviewed with the facility NHA on 2/20/26 at 8:49 AM. The NHA reported that Resident #10 was visited by the psychiatric NP multiple times after an incident that occurred on 12/6/25. These notes included visits on 12/23/25, 1/2/26 and 1/22/26 that were not on Resident #10's record during review the day prior on 2/19/26. He was notified of the regulatory concern at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to complete a facility assessment with all the information as required. This was evident during the extended survey review. The findings include:During review of the facility assessment, secondary to completing the extended survey, it was determined that the facility assessment provided revealed what the facility offers, however it is not based on a 'facility assessment.'At entrance to the facility on 2/19/26 a resident matrix was requested and provided. On this matrix it notes a resident with a tracheostomy. Record review on 2/20/26 at 1:00 PM revealed that this Resident #12, also has a gastrostomy tube in place for nutritional support. However, review of the facility assessment failed to show that any current residents are in need of tracheostomy or gastrostomy support, only that the facility 'offers' those services. Additionally, it notes that they have 'supportive care' for behavioral/mental health providers. It does not say who, therefore the qualifications are not there-i.e. NP, Dr, SW,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of employee files and interviews with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to employee staff with active professional licenses relevant to their hired job descriptions. This was evident during the review of 1 of 2 employee files, (Staff #7)The findings include: On 2/20/26 at 8am, the surveyor reviewed complaint #2682305 which alleged that Register Nurse (Staff) #7 was employed as a Supervisor RN at the facility without an active license from 12/5/22 to 8/30/23. The state of Maryland's Board of Nursing (MBON) does not recognize staff #7 license due to graduation from a program that is not recognized and approved by the Board.A record review on 2/21/26 at 9:30 AM, of staff #7's personnel file, showed staff #7's RN license was issued in Virginia only (compact designation) on 10/18/22 from [NAME], FL 33610. Staff #7 RN license was suspended in Virginia on 3/13/23. Staff #7's personnel file also listed his/her primary address as Maryland.On 2/24/26 8:54 an interview with the Human…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, comfortable, and functional environment for the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER].The findings include:An interview on 2/20/26 at 11:00 AM, with Resident #2 in room [ROOM NUMBER] for complaint #2682305 revealed the facility's staff failed to ensure a safe interior environment.On 2/20/26 at 1Pm, a tour of room [ROOM NUMBER] with the Maintenance Director revealed unattended maintenance needs: The grab bar in the bathroom next to the toilet was not firmly attached to the wall.The floor tile to the bathroom was missing and cracked. This made it difficult for the residents to roll in and out of the bathroom using a wheelchair or walker.The cable cover plate was not attached to the wall.The ceiling had evidence of water damage with marked brown areas.The nightstand had a broken handle.room [ROOM NUMBER] has damaged walls with peeling paint and scrapes throughout greater at the head of the beds. Cross reference F 584.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of a facility reported incident and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to immediately report an incident of alleged abuse by a resident to the Office of Health Care Quality. This finding was evident for 1 (Resident #62) of 4 residents selected for an abuse investigation. This finding is related to facility reported incident # MD00214230. The findings include: On 03/24/25 at 11:13 AM surveyor review of the facility reported incident revealed that Resident #62 alleged Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA), Staff #19, sent him/her a text message on 11/10/24, threatening to poison him/her. Further review of the alleged incident revealed that during the previous survey at the facility, Resident #62 reported this alleged incident to a surveyor from the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) on 1/29/25. The surveyor immediately relayed the allegation to the Director of Nursing (DON). An interview was held with the Administrator on 3/25/25 and 3/26/25 which revealed no new information.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility reported abuse allegation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation that alleged abuse was thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 of 3 facility reported incidents reviewed during the survey. This finding is related to facility reported incident # MD00214230. The findings include: On 03/24/25 at 11:13 AM surveyor review of the facility reported incident revealed that Resident #62 alleged Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA), Staff #19, sent him/her a text message on 11/10/24, threatening to poison him/her. An interview was held with the Director of Social Services, Staff #8, on 03/24/25 at 12:26 PM. Reviewed the investigation file with SSD. The SSD confirmed that he was one of the staff members who investigated the incident. However, there was no evidence found in the facility's investigation file related to the allegation of abuse by Resident #62. On 3/25/25 8:30 AM surveyor interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed no new information.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report a threat of physical violence against a resident as required. This was evident for 1 (#39) of 53 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A complaint alleging that a staff member attempted to poison Resident #39 was investigated on 1/29/25 at 8:03 AM. A review of Resident #39's medical record included a plan of care developed on 9/13/24 for behavioral problems as evidenced by blocking staff access to other residents, verbal aggression to staff and fabrication of care issues. Social Services progress notes revealed that the facility addressed the residents' concerns, but were not able to substantiate the attempted poisoning allegations and offered the resident a room change to another unit. On 1/29/25 at 12:45 PM, the Administrator provided a Service Comment Form, dated 10/10/24, which described the actions taken to address the residents concerns and included The resident was offered a room/unit change, and s/he declined. As a precaution, the accused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to prevent further potential exploitation while an investigation was in progress, and 2) failed to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 2 facility reported incidents reviewed for 1 (#11) of 53 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #MD00197317 was reviewed on 1/27/25 at 11:17 AM. The report indicated that Resident #11 alleged that Staff #12 a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) took his/her wallet, which contained $15.00, while making his/her bed on 9/21/23. The facility reported the incident, conducted an investigation, was unable to substantiate the allegation, and submitted their final report to the state on 9/27/23. The facility's report and investigation documentation failed to reveal that Staff #12 was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Staff schedules revealed that Staff #12 worked 7AM-3PM on 9/21/23. The Administrator was asked to provide evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of a complaint, staff interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately prepare a resident for discharge. This was evident for one resident during the review of 1 of 3 complaints regarding discharges. (Resident #23) The findings include: Review of the complaint #MD00203025 on 6/10/24 at 9:45 AM revealed concerns regarding Resident #23's discharge planning and preparation nor was the resident provided their personal belongings prior to the discharge. A review on 02/02/25, of the discharge that occurred on 2/01/23 and the completed paperwork revealed that Resident #23 had not signed any discharge paperwork, including the discharge instructions/post discharge plan review, and the resident property list. The discharge paperwork did not include wound care for the resident. The facility DON was interviewed on 02/04/25 at 9 AM. The facility process on discharge was reviewed. She stated that the staff are to review the discharge planning and have the resident sign it and then it is scanned into the computer. Additionally, this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to address a resident's concerns (resident # 49) of not being able to see from glasses received from a contracted provider in 8/2024. This was evident for 1 of 53 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 1/27/24 at 1:00pm, Ombudsman #3 reported that resident #49 complained that he/she was unable to see from glasses they received from the facility's vision vendor in 8/2024. Ombudsman #3 stated that he/she explained the resident's concerns in an email to the Director of Nursing (DON) in 11/2024. Resident #49 stated that he/she hasn't received new glasses as of 1/2025. Review of resident #49's medical records on 1/28/25 at 10:30am revealed that the resident had a optometry exam on 8/12/24 and received glasses as a result of the optometry exam. The resident received new glasses on 8/20/24. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/28/25 at 11:00am revealed that DON was unaware of resident #49's issues with his/her glasses. The surveyor pointed out that ombudsman #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent an accident when the facility staff failed to remove low-hanging extension cords from the 3rd floor ceiling. This would affect all residents and visitors on the back of the 3rd floor unit. The findings include: On 1/24/25 at approximately 10:30am, a surveyor touring the 3rd floor unit observed extension cords connected to temporary lights hanging from the ceiling tiles at the back of the unit. The surveyor observed that the extension cords were hanging low enough to hinder any resident or visitor walking in the area adjacent to rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/24/25 at 11:00am revealed the facility's 3rd floor back unit sustained a water leak at 1/10/25 at approximately 5:00pm. The water leak affected the back end of the 2nd and 3rd floors. Interview with the DON, Administrator and the Maintenance Director on 1/24/25 at 2:00pm revealed the water leak from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician care orders for a resident admitted with a colostomy. This was evident for 1 (#41) of 3 residents reviewed related to a complaint about colostomy care. The findings include: On 1/24/25 at 2:43 PM, a review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility post colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening (stoma) in the abdomen through which waste from the large intestine (colon) can be discharged into a bag) at the beginning of May 2024. Further review on 1/28/25 at 9:36 AM failed to reveal any orders in place for the care and treatment of the ostomy from 5/29/24 -7/18/24 during the resident's intermittent stay in the facility when the resident went to the hospital and returned to the facility. This concern was reviewed with the facility DON and the Regional DON on 1/28/25 at 1:07 PM. No further documentation that care was provided to the survey team that Resident #41 received care for their ostomy between 5/29/24 and 7/18/24

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents have a choice in recreational activities. This was true for 5 (#4, #9, #26, #50, and #64) out of the 7 residents representing the resident council. The findings include: This surveyor interviewed 7 residents representing the Resident Council on 3/1/20 at 1:30 PM. Five of the residents stated that if they want to go outside for fresh air in the courtyard, they need to ask for permission and request a staff to accompany them. If one is not available, then they cannot go out. Evidence to dispute the residents' allegation was not provided prior to exit.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and observation, it was determined the facility staff failed to promote care for residents in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality by labeling residents as feeders on a posted staffing board. This occurred on 1 of 2 nursing unit staffing boards. The findings included: On 3-1-2020 at 9:50 AM, the posted staffing board on the second floor nursing unit had written, Feeders: 201(2), 202(2), 204(1), 209(1), 210(1), 212(2), 216, 225(2), 230(1). The use of the undignified term feeder was confirmed with the Night Supervisor #3 at 9:50 AM on 3-1-2020.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the residents or responsible party in writing of the reason for Residents (#87, and #102) transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 2 of 6 resident reviewed for hospitalization during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 1/11/2020. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident, and or the resident's responsible party was given written notice in a language and manner that they understand. On 03/02/20 11:27 AM, the Director of Nursing was made aware there was no documentation found in the medical records that the residents, and or the resident's responsible party was given written notice in a language and manner they understand. This finding was confirmed by the Director of Nursing. 2. Closed record review conducted on 3/3/2020 at 1:02PM revealed the facility failed to send a notice of resident #102's transfer to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident or the resident's responsible party in writing of the facilities bed-hold policy before transferring them to the hospital. This was evident for 2 (Residents #87 and #102) of 6 residents sampled for investigations. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record on 3/1/2020 at 12:30 AM, for Resident #87 documented that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 1/11/2020. An interview with the facility Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/02/20 11:27 AM, confirmed the facility did not give Resident #87 a copy of the facilities bed hold policy. 2. Closed record review conducted on 3/3/2020 at 1:02PM revealed the facility failed to send a notice of resident #102's transfer to the hospital. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/3/2020 at 1:13 PM revealed the facility was aware of the requirements of transfer notices but the facility had yet to comply with this policy.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately transcribe a written physician order (Resident #1). This is evident for 1 of 3 resident's selected for infections review during the annual survey. The findings include: On 2-24-2020, Resident #1 returned from a Vascular Surgery appointment with new orders for the care of their right heel wound. The orders said to discontinue the wound vacuum dressing to the right heel and wear protective boots at all times. The right heel wound care was 1. every other day cleanse wound with [NAME] or other wound cleanser x 5 minutes. 2. Apply endoform to wound and cover with gauze to anterior and posterior ankle prior to wrapping with kerlix. Anterior ankle gauze is for protection. 3. Doctor to schedule split thickness skin graft week of March 9, 2020. Office will call facility with date/time/details. 4. Please draw CBC and CMP (lab tests) prior to procedure. The facility staff did not discontinue the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to have the appropriate interdisciplinary team members attend a Resident's care plan meeting (#304) and failed to maintain a fluid restriction as ordered by the physician for Resident #35. This was evident for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. Resident #304 was admitted to the facility with a feeding tube placed into the stomach for nutrition because the resident was unable to swallow. Resident #304 received all food in liquid form and fluids through this tube. On 8-6-19, a care plan meeting was held with Resident #304's family and the facilities social worker, nurse and the Director of Rehabilitation. The facility dietitian did not attend the care plan meeting, therefore, nutritional needs were not addressed. The Director of Nursing confirmed on 3-5-2020 at 11:00 AM that the dietitian did not attend the care plan meeting to address Resident #304's nutritional needs. 2. The facility staff failed to maintain a fluid restriction as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed ensure a resident was free from un-necessary medication by failing to discontinue the medication Lorazepam as ordered by the Physician for Resident (#77). This was evident for 1 of 53 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to discontinue the medication Lorazepam as ordered by the Physician for Resident (#77). Medical record review on 03/04/20 at 10:22 AM, for Resident #77 revealed on 1/9/20, the physician ordered Lorazepam (Ativan) x 14 days. This medication is used to treat anxiety. Lorazepam belongs to a class of drugs known as benzodiazepines, which act on the brain and nerves (central nervous system) to produce a calming effect. Further record review revealed the medication Ativan was noted on the Medication Administrator record for the months of January 23rd through March 4th, 2020. However, the facility staff did not document the administration of the medication pass the 14 days. After surveyor intervention, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview during facility environmental observations, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was observed on both resident care areas 2nd and 3rd floors of the facility. The findings include: On 8/17/2018 at 4 PM, an environmental tour was conducted with the Maintenance Director (Staff #16) to share observations of the survey team. The Maintenance Director took notes along the way. The following concerns were identified: In room [ROOM NUMBER], one of the side nightstands was missing a drawer. Multiple staples were observed in the wall along wall paper seams. A long gouge/gash and dirty spots were found in the wall paper along the accent wall of the room. In the restroom of room [ROOM NUMBER],there were two stained ceiling tiles. The maintenance director indicated that there was ccasional leakage from the floor above. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans with goals that were measurable. This was evident for 3 (#3, #51, and #54) of 27 residents investigated. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 on 8/20/18 revealed a care plan At risk for behavior symptoms r/t Dementia and cognitive impairment with the goal will reduce risk of behavioral symptoms. The goal was not measurable. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 on 8/20/18 revealed a care plan at risk for loss of range of motion r/t disease process, left hand contracture with the goal will exhibit no decline in ROM (range of motion) within confines of disease processes. The goal was not measurable. Review of the care plan is at risk for alteration in skin integrity related to: contractures, impaired mobility, and incontinence had the goal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to evaluate resident care plans. This was evident for 4 (#3, #51, #54, and #89) of 54 residents investigated during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 on 8/20/18 revealed a care plan At risk for behavior symptoms r/t Dementia and cognitive impairment with the goal will reduce risk of behavioral symptoms. An 8/7/18 care plan progress note documented that a meeting was held and who attended. It summarized that the resident did not attend group activities, wandered about unit and was unable to focus in group and that resident appeared content at times and at other times may become tearful. The note stated remains on psych caseload for management of medications, mood and behaviors. Resident remains at cognitive and emotional baseline with no new concerns. There was no evaluation of the goal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, it was determined the facility failed to discard medications/biologicals after the expiration date. This was evident for 3 of 5 medication carts observed on 1 of 2 nursing units. The findings include: Observation was made, on [DATE] at 12:38 PM, of Medication Cart #2 on the second- floor nursing unit of (1) box of Assure Dose for Glucose Monitoring; Lot #05186A with an expiration date of 10/17. Also observed was Resident #85's Humalog 100U/1ml insulin vial which was opened on [DATE]. According to the manufacture's website, Humalog Insulin should have been discarded after being opened for 28 days. Staff #5 was with the surveyor during the observation. Observation was made, on [DATE] at 12:43 PM, of Medication Cart #3 on the second-floor nursing unit of (2) Glucose control Solutions G3 2.5 ml., Lot #16816063102 with an expiration date of [DATE] and (1) Glucose control solutions Lot #16816073102/202 with an expiration date of [DATE]. There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-08-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility Quality Assurance & Assessment (QA&A) activities, previous survey results, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to remain free of repeat citations from previous surveys. This failure to remain free of repeat citations is evidence that the facility's efforts to correct citations have not been effective. This was true for 5 of 18 (F584, F609, F641, F656, & F812) citations assessed on this annual recertification survey. The findings include: The facility received repeat citations from their January, 2016 and May, 2017 annual recertification surveys for 1. maintaining a clean, safe, and homelike evironment; 2. timely reporting of abuse; 3. development of comprehensive care plans; 4. accuracy of assessments; and 5. sanitary procurement, storage, preparation, and serving of food. All five of these citations were being cited under analogous F tags under the new survey process. Because the ongoing review of the above concerns by the quality assurance committee failed to correct ongoing deficiencies, the facility was cited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews,and facility investigation it was determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from verbal abuse as evidenced by reports of a resident being verbally abused by a staff member. This was evident during the review of facility reported incident MD00127467. The findings include: Review of Resident # 400's medical record on 8/21/18 at 10am revealed multiple co-morbidities including Bipolar Disorder and Opioid Dependency. Investigation Report, dated 6/1/18, revealed that, on 6/1/18 at 11:45am, a representative from I Care transportation witnessed a GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) speaking inappropriately to resident # 400, while waiting to transport the resident to an appointment. On 6/1/18 at 3:10pm, the representative from I Care transportation returned resident #400 from his/her appointment and reported to nurse # 7 and the Unit manager #13 that he/she witnessed a GNA using foul language while in the residents' room this morning. The facility identified the GNA as (Staff #2). Review of the facility investigation revealed a written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews and review of the facility investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse immediately. This was evident during the review of facility reported incident MD00127467. The findings include: Review of Resident # 400's medical record, on 8/21/18 at 10am, revealed multiple co-morbidities including Bipolar Disorder and Opioid Dependency. Investigation Report, dated 6/1/18, revealed that, on 6/1/18 at 11:45am, a representative from I Care transportation witnessed a GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) speaking inappropriately to resident # 400, while waiting to transport the resident to an appointment. On 6/1/18 at 3:10 pm the representative from I Care transportation returned resident #400 from his/her appointment and reported to nurse # 7 and the Unit manager #13 that he/she witnessed a GNA using foul language while in the residents' room this morning. The facility identified the GNA as (Staff #2). Review of the facility investigation on 8/21/18 at 11:am revealed that GNA #1 (Geriatric Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-21 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate a significant change MDS assessment for (Residents #112). This was evident for 1 out of the 7 residents reviewed. A significant change in status assessment is a comprehensive assessment that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either a major improvement or decline. When a resident is enrolled is a hospice program a significant change in status assessment. The findings include: Review of Resident # 112's medical records on 8/21/18 at 10am, revealed that the resident was admitted to hospice services on 6/1/18. Further review of the medical record revealed that the facility staff failed to initiate a significant change MDS assessment regarding the resident's change in condition. During interview with the MDS Coordinator (staff # 3) on 8/21/18 at 12pm, s/he stated the resident was not receiving hospice services; therefore, a significant change MDS was not needed. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#107) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 (#65) of 3 residents review for dental services. The findings include: 1. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. Review of Resident #107's medical record on 8/20/18 revealed that the resident had a fall on 5/11/18. The progress note, dated 5/11/18 at 20:33, (8:30 PM) stated, Resident alert and oriented x 4. Found by GNA sitting on bathroom floor beside toilet. Assessed by this writer, no injury nor c/o pain. Asked by this writer, why he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident with a copy of his/her baseline care plan. This was evident for 1 (#207) of 1 residents reviewed for care plan. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The findings include: Resident #207's medical record was reviewed on 8/16/18 at 10:09 AM. The record revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE] and that a baseline care plan was created on that date as well. During an interview on 8/16/18 at 10:35 AM, Staff #11 was asked what the facility provided to the resident when the baseline care plan was completed. He/She indicated that the facility would provide a copy of the resident's medication list and a copy of the care plan. If the resident/representative did not attend the meeting, the copies would be physically delivered to the resident, or mailed to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders and the care plan for potential for altered skin integrity for a resident who was totally dependent on staff for all mobility needs and by failing to administer routine medication for pain and anticogulation as per the resident's plan of care and physicians orders. This was evident for 1 (#54) of 5 residents reviewed for positioning and for 1 (#207) of 4 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #54's medical record on 8/20/18 revealed August 2018 physician's orders for Medi-Boots to bilateral feet at all times which was initially ordered on 5/26/17. Medi-Boots are protectors for the heels to protect against pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #54's care plan at risk for alteration in skin integrity related to: contractures, impaired mobility and incontinence, which was initiated on 5/27/17, had the intervention float heels as able.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food in a sanitary manner. This was observed during 1 of 3 dining observations. The findings include: Observation was made, on 08/15/18 at 12:05 PM, in the second-floor dining room of a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) setting up the lunch tray for Resident #67. The GNA (staff #15) was observed to use his/her bare fingers to pull bread out of a plastic bag for resident #67. At 12:08 PM, a nurse (staff #5) was observed to pull cookies out of a plastic bag with his/her bare hand for resident #67. On 8/17/18, administrative staff were informed of the observations of bare hand touching of food, empathizing that employees should prevent contact of ready-to-eat food with their bare hands.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately document in resident medical records as evidenced by licensed nursing staff signing off that treatments were implemented when the treatments were observed not implemented. This was evident for 1 (#54) of 5 residents reviewed for positioning, 1 (#207) of 7 residents reviewed for medication review, 1 (#58) of 8 residents reviewed based on facility complaints, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice care. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #54's medical record, on 8/20/18, revealed August 2018 physician's orders for Medi-Boots to bilateral feet at all times which was initially ordered on 5/26/17. Medi-Boots are protectors for the heels to protect against pressure ulcers. Observation was made on 8/20/18 at 3:05 PM of Resident #54 receiving care by 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs). The resident's incontinence brief was changed, and the resident was positioned on his/her back with a sheet covering the resident. The resident did not have anything on his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2018-08-21 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 3 (#109, #3, #94) of 6 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #109 on 8/20/18 revealed that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 5/18/18 for acute renal failure and failure to thrive. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the responsible party was notified in writing of the transfer. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #3 on 8/20/18 revealed that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 6/15/18 for mental status changes, on 7/5/18 for shortness of breath, and on 7/9/18 for an emergency psychological evaluation. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the responsible party was notified in writing of the transfer. 3) Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2018-08-21 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred to an acute care facility. This was evident for 3 (#109, #3, #94) of 6 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #109 on 8/20/18, revealed that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 5/18/18 for acute renal failure and failure to thrive. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the responsible party was given written notice of the bed hold policy. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #3 on 8/20/18 revealed that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 6/15/18 for mental status changes, on 7/5/18 for shortness of breath, and on 7/9/18 for an emergency psychological evaluation. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the responsible party was given written notice of the bed hold policy. 3)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$52,359 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $41,870 — penalty dated 2026-02-24
  • $10,489 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 28 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
2 of 5Atlas Post Acute At Woodbury Country ClubWoodbury, NJ 2 of 5Haverhill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 2 of 5Port Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterNewburyport, MA 2 of 5Rossville Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Elms Rehab And Healthcare Center Of CranburyCranbury, NJ 2 of 5Village Green Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBristol, CT 2 of 5Wynwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCinnaminson, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At Daughters OClifton, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At WashingtonSewell, NJ 3 of 5Masconomet Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTopsfield, MA 3 of 5Nemasket Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMiddleborough, MA 3 of 5Oak Knoll Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterFramingham, MA 4 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At MaywoodMaywood, NJ 4 of 5Cedar Grove Respiratory And Nursing CenterWilliamstown, NJ 4 of 5Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterDanvers, MA 4 of 5Meadowbrook Respiratory And Nursing CenterMatawan, NJ 4 of 5Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterLittle Egg Harbor Tw, NJ 4 of 5Shrewsbury Rehabilitation And Nursing At SouthgateShrewsbury, MA 4 of 5Sippican Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMarion, MA 4 of 5Suffield House Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenteSuffield, CT 4 of 5Towson Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 5 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare At West DeptforWest Deptford, NJ 5 of 5Birchwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCranford, NJ 5 of 5Bride Brook Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterNiantic, CT 5 of 5Manchester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterManchester, CT 5 of 5Pendleton Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterMystic, CT 5 of 5Vernon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterVernon, CT 5 of 5Waterfront Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRaritan, NJ

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TRR SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2023
JMH FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
JMH FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
MLS FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
MLS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
SGS FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
SGS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
OPPENHEIMER, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEENO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
BAK, PINCHOSIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$235K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 9%Other / private 19%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $235K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,743per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$306per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215301. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next